Research Article
Print
Research Article
Evolution of the connection patterns of the cephalic lateral line canal system and its use to diagnose opsariichthyin cyprinid fishes (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)
expand article infoTaiki Ito, Toyoaki Fukuda§, Toshihiko Morimune|, Kazumi Hosoya|
‡ Wetlands International Japan, Tokyo, Japan
§ Tezukayama Junior & Senior High School, Nara, Japan
| Kindai University, Nara, Japan
Open Access

Abstract

The cephalic lateral line canal systems were compared among 12 species of the cyprinid tribe Opsariichthyini. All species were characterized by the separation of the supraorbital canal from both the infraorbital and the temporal canals, and the left side of the supratemporal canal from the right side of the canal. In species of Candidia, Opsariichthys, Parazacco, and Zacco, and Nipponocypris sieboldii the temporal canal was separated from the preoperculomandibular canal. In Nipponocypris temminckii and N. koreanus, the temporal canal was connected to the preoperculomandibular canal. Separation of the left and right sides of the supratemporal canal is a possible synapomorphy of the opsariichthyin cyprinids. Opsariichthys uncirostris and O. bidens are unique among the opsariichthyins in that the connection between the infraorbital and temporal canals is retarded. The variation in arrangement of the cephalic lateral line canal system can be used as diagnostic characters for the opsariichthyin species.

Keywords

Candidia , heterochrony, morphology, Parazacco , sensory organs, Zacco

Introduction

The cyprinid tribe Opsariichthyini, of the subfamily Xenocypridinae (Liao et al. 2011; Kottelat 2013), comprises the East Asian genera Opsariichthys Bleeker, 1863, Zacco Jordan & Evermann, 1902, Candidia Jordan & Richardson, 1909, Parazacco Chen, 1982, and Nipponocypris Chen, Wu & Hsu, 2008 (Wang et al. 2007, Chen et al. 2008, Kottelat 2013). The opsariichthyins comprise approximately 19 species (Kim et al. 2005, Huynh and Chen 2013, Ito and Hosoya 2016). The opsariichthyin fishes are distributed in eastern Asia from Russia, Japan, through the Korean Peninsula to China, Taiwan, and northern Vietnam (Kottelat 2001, Kim and Park 2002, Chen and Chang 2005, Serov et al. 2006). They are loosely defined as a monophyletic group on the basis of a single character, namely, a long anal fin (Chen 1982), and recent molecular phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of the group (e.g., Wang et al. 2007, Tang et al. 2013). However, morphological characters relevant for taxonomy have not been examined in detail for this group.

Variations in the connection pattern of the cephalic lateral line canals, and the number and the distribution of canal pores on the head have often been used in the study of interrelationships within the family Cyprinidae (Lekander 1949, Gosline 1975, Howes 1980, Chen et al. 1984, Hosoya 1986, Cavender and Coburn 1992, Arai and Kato 2003, Fujita and Hosoya 2005). Characteristics of the cephalic lateral line canal system have also been useful as diagnostic characters within the Cyprinidae (e.g., Illick 1956, Reno 1969, Gosline 1974, Kurawaka 1977). In particular, the connection pattern of the cephalic lateral line canal systems is species diagnostic in some cyprinid subfamilies such as the Acheilognathinae, Gobioninae, and Leuciscinae (Illick 1956, Kurawaka 1977, Arai and Kato 2003, Fujita and Hosoya 2005, Kawase and Hosoya 2015). However, the opsariichthyin cyprinids have not been thoroughly studied in terms of their cephalic lateral line canal system.

The objectives of the present study are to: (a) describe the connecting patterns of the cephalic lateral line canal system in the opsariichthyins, (b) provide diagnostic characters for the opsariichthyin species, (c) discuss the evolution of the connecting patterns observed.

Materials and methods

The genus level classification of the Opsariichthyini follows Chen et al. (2008), although that classification still needs to be confirmed (Yin et al. 2015, cf. Hosoya 2013). The cephalic lateral line canal system was observed in 12 species of opsariichthyins; data on the canal system in the out-group were compiled from previous studies (Tables 12).

Table 1.

Fish species used in the present molecular phylogenetic analysis.

Classification Species Source Accession no.
Xenocypridinae
opsariichthyin
Candidia barbata Wang et al. (2007) AY958200
Candidia pingtungensis*1 Wang et al. (2007) AY958201
Nipponocypris koreanus Chen et al. (2016b) NC025286
Nipponocypris sieboldii Wang et al. (2007) AY958198
Nipponocypris temminckii Wang et al. (2007) AY958199
Opsariichthys bidens Wang et al. (2007) AY958197
Opsariichthys evolans*2 Wang et al. (2007) AY968191
Opsariichthys kaopingensis*3 Wang et al. (2007) AY958189
Opsariichthys pachycephalus Wang et al. (2007) AY958190
Opsariichthys uncirostris Wang et al. (2007) AY958193
Parazacco spilurus Chang et al. (2016a) NC023786
Zacco platypus Wang et al. (2007) AY958194
others
Culter alburnus unpublished GU190362
Ctenopharyngodon idella Wang et al. (2008) EU391390
Hemigrammocypris rasborella Tang et al. (2010) AP011422
Hypophthalmichthys nobilis unpublished EU343733
Ischikauia steenackeri He et al. (2004) AF375862
Macrochirichthys macrochirus Tang et al. (2010) AP011234
Metzia lineata Tang et al. (2010) HM224305
Ochetobius elongatus He et al. (2004) AF309506
Parachela siamensis Tang et al. (2010) HM224300
Paralaubuca typus Saitoh et al. (2011) AP011211
Squaliobarbus curriculus Tang et al. (2010) HM224308
Xenocypris macrolepis*4 Tang et al. (2010) HM224310
Acheilognathinae
Acheilognathus typus Saitoh et al. (2006) AB239602
Rhodeus ocellatus Saitoh et al. (2006) AB070205
Tanakia limbata Tang et al. (2010) HM224309
Gobioninae
Hemibarbus barbus Saitoh et al. (2006) AB070241
Pseudorasbora parva Tang et al. (2010) HM224302
Leuciscinae
Scardinius erythrophthalmus unpublished NC031561
Tribolodon hakonensis Imoto et al. (2013) NC018820
Table 2.

The connection states of the cephalic lateral line canal system in the opsariichthyins and out-group.

Classification Species SO-IO IO-TC TC-POM ST-ST Source
Xenocypridinae
opsariichthyin
Candidia barbata*1 + This study
Candidia pingtungensis + This study
Nipponocypris koreanus + + This study
Nipponocypris sieboldii + This study
Nipponocypris temminckii + + This study
Opsariichthys bidens ± This study
Opsariichthys evolans + This study
Opsariichthys kaopingensis + This study
Opsariichthys pachycephalus + This study
Opsariichthys uncirostris ± This study
Parazacco spilurus*2 + This study
Zacco platypus + This study
others
Culter alburnus + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Ctenopharyngodon idella + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Hemigrammocypris rasborella + + Takeuchi et al. (2011)
Hypophthalmichthys nobilis + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Ischikauia steenackeri + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Macrochirichthys macrochirus + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Metzia lineata + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Ochetobius elongatus + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Parachela siamensis + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Paralaubuca typus + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Squaliobarbus curriculus + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Xenocypris macrolepis + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Acheilognathinae
Acheilognathus typus + Arai and Kato (2003)
Rhodeus ocellatus + Arai and Kato (2003)
Tanakia limbata + Arai and Kato (2003)
Gobioninae
Hemibarbus barbus + + + + Hosoya (1986)
Pseudorasbora parva + + Kawase and Hosoya (2015)
Leuciscinae
Scardinius erythrophthalmus + + + + Takeuchi (2012)
Tribolodon hakonensis + + Kurawaka (1977)

Methods used for observation of the cephalic lateral line canal systems followed those of Fujita and Hosoya (2005). The canals were stained using Cyanine suminol 5R. The canal terminology follows that of Arai and Kato (2003), with additional reference to that of Fujita and Hosoya (2005). These are as follows: infraorbital canal (IO), preoperculomandibular canal (POM), supraorbital canal (SO), supratemporal canal (ST), and temporal canal (TC) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Terminology used for cephalic lateral line canal systems: SO supraorbital canal IO infraorbital canal TC temporal canal POM preoperculomandibular canal ST supratemporal canal frb frontal bridge cpb centroparietal bridge itb infratemporal bridge apj anteropteroitic joint.

Furthermore, the canaliculi branching from each canal are defined as “bridges,” whereas the junctions connecting canals were termed “joints.” The three bridges and one joint were as follows: “frontal bridge” between SO and IO; “centroparietal bridge” recognizing that ST meets the opposite side ST; “infratemporal bridge” between POM and TC; and “anteropterotic joint” between IO and TC (Fig. 1).

In some species in cyprinid subfamilies such as Gobioninae and Leuciscinae, development of the cephalic lateral line canal system is generally completed when the fish is approximately 60 mm in total length (= TL) (Lekander 1949, Disler 1971, Hosoya 1986). Therefore, in the present study, specimens larger than 60 mm in TL were selected for examination. The pores on each canal were counted from end to end. Statistical tests were used to assess differences in the number of pores among the species. Tests for homogeneity of variance were carried out on the number of pores on each canal using Bartlett’s test in R 3.3.1 (R Core Team 2016). When the variances were homogeneous, the Tukey-Kramer test was used, whereas when variances were heterogeneous, the Steel-Dwass test in R 3. 3.1 was used.

To obtain a hypothesis about the branching pattern of the opsariichthyin species, we analyzed mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b) gene sequences downloaded from GenBank. This is because molecular data for the cyt b gene sequence of all the species examined in the present study have been accumulated by previous studies (Table 1). Cyt b sequence alignment of 1137 bp long sequences was performed using MEGA 7 (Kumar et al. 2016) and checked manually for accuracy. Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis for phylogenetic reconstruction was applied using PAUP* v. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). Models of molecular evolution were selected using the program MODELTEST v.3.7 (Posada and Crandall 1998), with the best fitting model being determined by the Akaike information criteria (AIC) (= GTR+G+I model, in the present analysis). Three species of the subfamily Acheilognathinae, two species of the subfamily Gobioninae, two species of the subfamily Leuciscinae, and 12 species of the Xenocypridinae were chosen as out-groups (Table 1). Polarity in the character evolutions of the connecting pattern of the cephalic lateral line canals was determined by character state reconstruction using Mesquite v.2.75 (Maddison and Maddison 2010) with maximum parsimony methodology. Maximum parsimony character state reconstruction was performed on the ML tree.

Specimens studied are deposited in the following institutions: Chonbuk National University, Jeollabuk-do, Korea (CNUC); Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan (FAKU); Fisheries Research Laboratory, Mie University, Mie, Japan (FRLM); Lake Biwa Museum, Shiga, Japan (LBM); the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan (NSMT); Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden (NRM); Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC, United States (USNM). The institutional code of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, was changed from FKUN (Department of Fisheries, Kindai University, Nara) to KUN-P (Kindai University, Nara, Pisces) with faculty reorganization in 2005.

Material examined

Candidia barbata (Regan, 1908): FKUN 34180, 1, 94.8 mm standard length (= SL), Tamsui River, Taipei, Taiwan; FKUN 35264–35272, 9 , 49.3–94.8 mm SL, Shueili River, Nantou, Taiwan; KUN-P 44430–44433, 4 , 94.7–103.0 mm SL, Houlong River, Miaoli, Taiwan.

Candidia pingtungensis Chen Wu & Hsu, 2008: FKUN 35214–35215, KUN-P 44492, 44515–44516, 5, 53.3–112.9 mm SL, Kaoping River, Pingtung, Taiwan.

Nipponocypris koreanus (Kim, Oh & Hosoya, 2005): KUN-P 40584–40591, 8, 69.3–111.9 mm SL, Nakdong River, Yeongwol, Korea; KUN-P 44463, 44475–44476, 3, 111.3–137.2 mm SL, Nakdong River, Gyongnam, Korea.

Nipponocypris sieboldii (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846): KUN-P 40564–40573, 10, 81.3–105.0 mm SL, Yamato River Nara Pref., Japan; KUN-P 44764–44767, 4, 63.7–85.8 mm SL, Kizu River, Kyoto Pref., Japan.

Nipponocypris temminckii (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846): KUN-P 40574–40581, 40583, 9, 85.2–100.9 mm SL, Kizu River, Kyoto Pref., Japan; KUN-P 45003, 45005–45006, 3, 79.1–145.3 mm SL, Shiomi River, Saga Pref., Japan; KUN-P 45104–45105, 45109, 3, 110.8–130.9 mm SL, Kawatana River, Nagasaki Pref., Japan.

Opsariichthys bidens Günther, 1873: LBM 8852, 47588, FRLM 28191–28192 (captive bred individuals), USNM 86307, 5, 66.7–108.1 mm SL, ChangJiang River, Sichuan, China; NSMT 12464, 10, 61.7–80.5 mm SL, Cheng-te, Hebei, China.

Opsariichthys evolans (Jordan & Evermann, 1902): FKUN 35196–35199, 35255, 35256, 6, 50.9–81.1 mm SL, Fengshan River, Hsinchu, Taiwan; KUN-P 44427–44429, 3, 69.5–80.6 mm SL, Houlong River, Miaoli, Taiwan.

Opsariichthys kaopingensis Chen, Wu & Huang, 2009: KUN-P 40545–40547, 44402, 44404–44405, 44407, 7, 69.2–83.0 mm SL, Kaoping River, Pingtung, Taiwan.

Opsariichthys pachycephalus (Günther,1868): FKUN 35179–35183, 35194, 35195, 7, 69.4–95.4 mm SL, Fengshan River, Hsinchu, Taiwan; FKUN 35245, 35250, 35252, 3, 56.0–70.3 mm SL, Keelung River, Taipei, Taiwan.

Opsariichthys uncirostris (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846): FKUN 16487–16488, 16492, 16495, 4, 211.5–228.0 mm SL, Ishida River, Shiga Pref., Japan; FKUN 16561, 16569, 16574, 3, 83.9–139.6 mm SL, Lake Biwa, Shiga Pref., Japan; KUN-P 40548–40554, 40592, 44528, 44529, 10, 145.1–231.8 mm SL, Mano River, Shiga Pref., Japan; FKUN 31878–31880, 3, 65.8–80.7 mm SL, Bukhan River, Korea; KUN-P 40636, 1, 206.5 mm SL, Gupo fish market, Korea; CNUC 37632, 1, 213.1 mm SL, Mangyeong River, Korea.

Parazacco spilurus (Günther, 1868): NRM 59489, 2, 56.6–82.8 mm SL, Pearl River, Guangxi Province, China; KUN-P 44899, 45852, 2, 57.5–105.6 mm SL, Pearl River, Hongkong, China.

Zacco platypus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846): KUN-P 40555–40563, 9, 79.1–93.0 mm SL, Yamato River, Nara Pref., Japan; KUN-P 44379, 44381, 44383, 44386–44388, 6, 114.5–123.4 mm SL, Mono River, Shiga Pref., Japan.

Results

The cephalic lateral line canal system is comprised of five canals, three bridges, and one joint in all opsariichthyin specimens examined (Fig. 2A–L). No intraspecific variation was found in the connection patterns of the cephalic lateral line canals when conspecific specimens of similar size were compared.

Figure 2. 

Diagram of the cephalic lateral line canal systems in the opsariichthyin fishes. A Candidia barbata, FKUN 34180, 94.8 mm SL B C. pingtungensis, FKUN 35215, 72.9 mm SL C Nipponocypris koreanus, FKUN 40587, 94.1 mm SL. Scale bar 5 mm. D N. sieboldii, FKUN 40571, 90.5 mm SL E N. temminckii, FKUN 40575, 94.5 mm SL F Opsariichthys bidens, LBM 8852, 94.8 mm SL. Scale bar 5 mm. G O. evolans, FKUN 35199, 81.1 mm SL H O. kaopingensis, KUN-P40545, 80.0 mm SL I O. pachycephalus, FKUN 35181, 69.4 mm SL. Scale bar 5 mm. J O. uncirostris, FKUN 16487, 219.0 mm SL K Parazacco spilurus, KUN-P45852, 57.5 mm SL L Zacco platypus, FKUN 40558, 93.0 mm SL. Scale bar 5 mm.

The canals were usually well ossified, although part of the POM (see below), the frontal bridge, the infratemporal bridge, and the anteropterotic joint were cutaneous tubes. The SO was housed in the nasal and frontal bones. This canal was separated from the IO and TC in all the opsariichthyin fishes (with the exception of one specimen of P. spilurus in which the SO and IO were connected: NRM 59489, 82.8 mm SL).The IO runs along a series of five infraorbital bones. This canal was connected with the TC in all species; however, the canal was separated from the TC in individuals less than ca. 180 mm SL in O. uncirostris and ca. 100 mm SL in O. bidens. The POM was found in the anguloarticular, dentary, and preopercular bones. In the anguloarticular, the canal was cutaneous. The TC runs in the pterotic. No connection between the TC and POM was observed, except in N. temminckii and N. koreanus, in which the TC was connected with the POM by the infratemporal bridge. The ST passes through the parietal bone. In all the opsariichthyin species, the left and right sides of the ST were typically separated (except for three specimens of C. barbata in which left and right sides of the ST connected: FKUN 35270–35272, 49.3–54.7 mm SL). The ST was connected with the TC and the trunk canal in all the opsariichthyin species.

Connecting patterns of the cephalic lateral line canal system of the out-groups are shown in Table 2.

The number of pores on each canal are shown in Table 3. The opsariichthyins had 8–9 pores on the SO; 10–14 pores on the IO, 3–5 pores on the TC; 12–17 pores on the POM; 2–3 pores on the ST. The number of pores on the POM differs significantly between O. uncirostris and O. pachycephalus, O. evolans, Z. platypus (P < 0.01), O. kaopingensis and N. sieboldii (P < 0.05); between O. bidens and O. evolans (P < 0.05) and Z. platypus (P < 0.01); between N. koreanus and O. pachycephalus, O. evolans, and Z. platypus (P < 0.01); between N. temminckii and O. evolans, Z. platypus (P < 0.01) and O. pachycephalus (P < 0.05); and between C. barbata and Z. platypus (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the number of pores on the IO, SO, TC, and ST among the opsariichthyin fishes.

Table 3.

Mode, average ± standard deviation, and range of the number of pores in each part of the cephalic lateral line canal in the opsariichthyin cyprinids.

Species SO IO TC POM ST
Candidia barbata 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 11.91 ± 0.30, 11–12 4, 4.00 ± 0, 4 14, 14.27 ± 1.27, 12–16 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Candidia pingtungensis 8, 8.20 ± 0.45, 8–9 12, 12.60 ± 0.89, 12–14 4, 4.00 ± 0, 4 15, 14.20 ± 0.84, 13–15 3, 2.80 ± 0.45, 2–3
Nipponocypris koreanus 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 11.82 ± 0.60, 11–13 4, 3.91 ± 0.30, 3–4 15, 14.91 ± 0.83, 13–16 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Nipponocypris sieboldii 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 11.93 ± 0.83, 10–13 4, 4.11 ± 0.31, 4–5 14, 13.79 ± 0.97, 12–15 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Nipponocypris temminckii 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 11.67 ± 0.49, 11–12 4, 4.07 ± 0.26, 4–5 15, 14.53 ± 0.99, 13–17 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Opsariichthys bidens 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 12 ± 0.37, 11-13 4, 4 ± 0.37, 3-5 14, 14.33 ± 0.70, 13–16 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Opsariichthys evolans 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 11.56 ± 0.73, 10–12 4, 4.00 ± 0, 4 12, 13.00 ± 0.87, 12–14 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Opsariichthys kaopingensis 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 11.57 ± 0.53, 11–12 4, 4.00 ± 0, 4 13, 13.43 ± 0.79, 13–15 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Opsariichthys pachycephalus 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 12, 12.22 ± 0.67, 11–13 4, 4.11 ± 0.33, 4–5 14, 13.22 ± 0.83, 12–14 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Opsariichthys uncirostris 8, 8.05 ± 0.22, 8–9 12, 11.95 ± 0.51, 11–13 4, 4.05 ± 0.22, 4–5 14, 14.95 ± 1.10, 14–17 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Parazacco spilurus 8, 8.00 ± 0, 8 11, 11.25 ± 0.50, 11–12 4, 4.00 ± 0.82, 3–5 14, 13.50 ± 1.00, 12–14 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3
Zacco platypus 8, 8.07 ± 0.27, 8–9 12, 11.79 ± 0.43, 11–12 4, 4.00 ± 0, 4 13, 13.00 ± 0.55, 12–14 3, 3.00 ± 0, 3

The topology of the ML tree is shown Figure 3. The ancestor at the root of the opsariichthyins on the ML tree was reconstructed as having canal separation between the SO and IO (Fig. 3A). The canal connection between the SO and IO was estimated to have occurred in at least four independent lineages in the out-group (see Fig. 3A). The ancestor at the root of the opsariichthyins was reconstructed as having canal separation between the TC and POM. In the opsariichthyins, the canal connection between the TC and POM emerged in the ancestor of N. temminckii and N. koreanus (Fig. 3B). The canal connection between the TC and POM emerged at least five lineages in the out-groups (Fig. 3B). The canal separation between the left and right sides of the ST independently emerged twice in the ancestors of the Acheilognathinae and the opsariichthyin (Fig. 3C). The canal connection and anterior extension between the right and left of the ST occurred at least twice in the out-groups (see Fig. 3C).

Figure 3. 

Parsimonious ancestral state reconstruction of the connecting states of the cephalic lateral line canal systems of the opsariichthyin fishes and their out-groups from the maximum likelihood tree inferred from cytochrome b sequences (InL = 12054.39). A The connecting states between the supraorbital (SO) and infraorbital (IO) canals B the connecting states between the temporal (TC) and preoperculomandibular (POM) canals C the connecting states between the left and right sides of the supratemporal canals (ST). The color of each node indicates the connecting states of the cephalic lateral line canal system: black, continuity; white, discontinuity; gray, both sides of the ST connected and extending anteriorly.

Discussion

The cephalic lateral line canal systems as a diagnostic character

Significant differences were found in the number of pores on the POM among some opsariichthyin species. However, the number of pores on these canals was found to vary within each species, and there was an overlap of ranges among all observed species (Table 3). Therefore, the number of pores on the cephalic lateral line canals does not provide reliable diagnostic character states for the opsariichthyin species.

In contrast, the connecting pattern of the cephalic lateral line canals provides useful diagnostic character states for some species of the opsariichthyins. Nipponocypris temminckii and N. koreanus are clearly distinguished from the very similar species N. sieboldii by the connection between the POM and TC through the infratemporal bridge. Similarly, O. uncirostris can be distinguished from O. bidens on the basis that the two species have different sizes at which the connection between the IO and TCattains completion (ca. 180 mm SL vs. ca. 100 mm SL, respectively), although many investigators have indicated that these two species can only be distinguished by the number of scales in the lateral series (e.g., Bănărescu 1968, Chen 1982).

Character evolution

All opsariichthyin species share the canal separation between the left and right sides of the ST. Although, this character state also occurs at the root of the Acheilognathinae, this characteristic strongly supports the monophyly of the opsariichthyins, because the characteristic was derived only once from the common ancestor of the opsariichthyins in the Xenocypridinae. The opsariichthyins have been defined in terms of a single shared character state, viz. a long anal fin (Chen 1982). Based on our analysis, the canal separation between the left and right sides of the ST is suggested as a possible synapomorphy of the opsariichthyin by the character state reconstruction. In addition, in the opsariichthyins, the canal connection between the POM and TC emerged in the ancestor of N. temminckii and N. koreanus (Fig. 3). The canal connection between the POM and TC is a possible synapomorphy of N. temminckii and N. koreanus. In the present study, there was no synapomorphy to link N. temminckii and N. koreanus, and N. sieboldii, and the current recognized genus Nipponocypris is not monophyletic. Our analyses suggested that Nipponocypris is paraphyletic, but further taxonomic study is required.

Evolution of the cephalic lateral line canal system ontogeny in Opsariichthys uncirostris and O. bidens

Opsariichthys uncirostris and O. bidens have a unique ontogeny of the cephalic lateral line canal system. In the Cyprinidae, the cephalic lateral line canal systems are generally completed at 40–60 mm in TL (Lekander 1949, Disler 1971, Hosoya 1986). In the opsariichthyins (with the exception of O. uncirostris and O. bidens), they are completed by approximately 60 mm SL. In O. uncirostris and O. bidens, canalization of the IO and TC through the anteropterotic joint is delayed until the individual reaches a mature size. Retardation of cephalic lateral line formation in both species can be explained in as a form of “isomorphosis”, a term proposed by Reilly et al. (1997) for cases in which heterochrony does not affect the offset shape. This is exemplified by a character state that is identical in the ancestor and descendant, although the descendant arrives at the same shape via a different ontogenetic trajectory. The delayed offset of cephalic lateral line formation seen in O. uncirostris and O. bidens is identical to “hypermorphosis” (sensu Reilly et al. 1997; cf. Hanken 2015), and the retardation of its developmental rate is identical to “deceleration” (sensu Reilly et al. 1997; cf. Hanken 2015). Both species are unique among opsariichthyin fishes in that they grow to between 250 (O. bidens) and 300 (O. uncirostris) mm TL (other opsariichthyin species are typically < 200 mm TL), and thus require more time to reach their mature size than other opsariichthyin species (Nakamura 1969, Tanaka 1970, Xing et al. 2007, Sui et al. 2012). Therefore, the retardation of cephalic lateral line formation in both species may be attributable to prolongation of the immature stage.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Exploratory Research (20657019). We are grateful to I. S. Chen, his students at the National Taiwan Ocean University, M. K. Oh, H. T. Lai (National Chia-Yi University: NCU), C. H. Tung (NCU), C. C. Han (National Museum of Marine Biology & Aquarium), M. Nitta (Hiroshima University) and S. Kunimatsu (Osaka University) for their cooperation in collecting materials. We are greatly indebted to C. H. Kim (National Fisheries Research and Development Institute), J. Y. Park (CNUC), S. Kimura (FRLM), Y. Kai (FAKU), T. Nakajima (LBM), S. Kullander (NRM), G. Shinohara (NSMT) and M. Nakae (NSMT) for providing materials, and to T. Fujita (Civil Engineering & Eco-Technology Consultants), Y. Kubo and T. Kitagawa (KUN) for their technical advice and helpful comments.

References

  • Arai R, Kato K (2003) Gross morphology and evolution of the cephalic lateral line system and infraorbital bone in bitterlings (Cyprinidae, Acheilognathinae), with an overview of the cephalic lateral line system in the family Cyprinidae. Bulletin of the National Science Museum 40: 1–42.
  • Bănărescu PM (1968) Revision of the genera Zacco and Opsariichthys (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Vĕstník Československé Společnosti Zoologické 32: 305–311.
  • Bleeker P (1863) Systema cyprinoideorum revisum. Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor de Dierkunde 1: 203.
  • Cavender TM, Coburn MM (1992) Phylogenetic relationships of North American Cyprinidae. In: Mayden RL (Ed.) Systematics, historical ecology and North American freshwater fishes.Stanford University Press, Stanford, 293–327.
  • Chang HY, Yuan LY, Hu TL, Chien CL, Lin YC, Tsenq SF, Chang TW, Wang WK (2016a) Complete mitochondrial DNA genome of Parazacco spilurus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA. Part A, DNA Mapping, Sequencing and Analysis 27: 165–166. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2013.878926
  • Chen IS, Chang YC (2005) The Photographic Guide of Inland Water Fishes, Vol. I, Cypriniformes. Sheichuan Press, Keelung, Taiwan, 284 pp.
  • Chen IS, Liu YW, Huang SP, Shen CN (2016b) The complete mitochondrial genome of the Korean minnow Nipponocypris koreanus (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA. Part A, DNA Mapping, Sequencing and Analysis 27: 708–710. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2014.913153
  • Chen IS, Wu JH, Hsu CH (2008) The taxonomy and phylogeny of Candidia (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Taiwan, with description of a new species and comments on a new genus. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 19: 203–214.
  • Chen XL, Yue PQ, Lin RD (1984) Major groups within the family Cyprinidae and their phylogenetic relationships. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 9: 424–440.
  • Chen IS, Wu JH, Huang SP (2009) The taxonomy and phylogeny of the cyprinid genus Opsariichthys Bleeker (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Taiwan, with description of a new species. Environmental Biology of Fishes 86: 165–183. https://doi.org/10.10007/s10641-009-9499-y
  • Chen YY (1982) A revision of opsariichthine cyprinid fishes. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica 13: 293–299.
  • Disler NN (1971) Lateral line sense organs and their importance in fish behavior (Translated from Russian). Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 328 pp.
  • Gosline WA (1974) Certain lateral-line canals of the head in cyprinid fishes, with particular reference to the derivation of North American forms. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 21: 9–15.
  • Gosline WA (1975) The cyprinid dermosphenotic and the subfamily Rasborinae. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan 673: 1–13.
  • Günther A (1868) Catalogue of the Fishes in the British Museum. Catalogue of the Physostomi, Containing the Families Heteropygii, Cyprinidae, Gonorhynchidae, Hyodontidae, Osteoglossidae, Clupeidae, Hirocentridae, Alepocephalidae, Notopteridae, Halosauridae, in the Collection of the British Museum. Volume Seventh. The Trustees, London, 512 pp.
  • Hanken J (2015) Is heterochrony still an effective paradigm for contemporary studies of Evo-devo? In: Love AC (Ed.) Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development.Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Volume 307. Springer, New York, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1_4
  • He S, Liu H, Kuwahara M, Nakajima T, Zhong Y (2004) Molecular phylogenetic relationships of Eastern Asian Cyprinidae (Pisces: Cypriniformes) inferred from cytochrome b sequences. Science China Life Sciences 47: 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1360/03yc0034
  • Hosoya K (1986) Interrelationships of the Gobioninae (Cyprinidae). In: Uyeno T, Arai R, Taniuchi T, Matsuura K (Eds) Indo-Pacific Fish Biology.Japanese Ichthyology Society, Tokyo, 484–501.
  • Hosoya K (2013) Danioninae. In: Nakabo T (Ed.) Fishes of Japan with Pictorial Keys to the Species (Third Edition). Tokai University Press, Tokyo, 317–319, 1815.
  • Howes GJ (1980) The anatomy, phylogeny and classification of bariliine cyprinid fishes. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 37: 129–198.
  • Huynh TQ, Chen I (2013) A new species of cyprinid fish of genus Opsariichthys from Ky Cung-Bang Giang river basin, northern Vietnam with notes on the taxonomic status of the genus from northern Vietnam and southern China. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 21: 135–145.
  • Illick HJ (1956) A comparative study of the cephalic lateral-line system of North American Cyprinidae. American Midland Naturalist 56: 204–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2422456
  • Imoto JM, Saitoh K, Sasaki T, Yonezawa T, Adachi J, Kartavtsev YP, Miya M, Nishida M, Hanzawa N (2013) Phylogeny and biogeography of highly diverged freshwater fish species (Leuciscinae, Cyprinidae, Teleostei) inferred from mitochondrial genome analysis. Gene 514: 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.10.019
  • Jordan DS, Evermann BW (1902) Notes on a collection of fishes from the island of Formosa. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 25: 315–368.
  • Jordan DS, Richardson RE (1909) A catalog of fishes of the Island of Formosa, or Taiwan: based the collections of Dr. Hans Sauter. Memoirs of Carnegie Museum 4: 159–204.
  • Kawase S, Hosoya K (2015) Pseudorasbora pugnax, a new species of minnow from Japan, and redescription of P. pumila (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 25: 289–298.
  • Kim IS, Park JY (2002) Freshwater Fishes of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing, Seoul, 465 pp.
  • Kim IS, Oh MK, Hosoya K (2005) A new species of cyprinid fish, Zacco koreanus with redescription of Z. temminckii (Cyprinidae) from Korea. Korean Journal of Ichthyology 17: 1–7.
  • Kottelat M (2001) Fishes of Laos. Wildlife Heritage Trust Publications, Colombo, 198 pp.
  • Kottelat M (2013) The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: a catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 27: 1–663.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Kurawaka K (1977) Cephalic lateral-line systems and geographical distribution in the genus Tribolodon (Cyprinidae). Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 24: 167–175.
  • Liao TY, Kullander SO, Fang F (2011) Phylogenetic position of rasborin cyprinids and monophyly of major lineages among the Danioninae, based on morphological characters (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Journal of Systematics and Evolutionary Research 49: 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2011.00621.x
  • Nakamura M (1969) Cyprinid Fishes of Japan. Research Institute for Natural Resources, Tokyo, 455 pp.
  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  • Reilly SM, Wiley EO, Meinhardt DJ (1997) An integrative approach to heterochrony: the distinction between interspecific and intraspecific phenomena. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01487.x
  • Saitoh K, Sado T, Doosey MH, Bart HL Jr., Inoue JG, Nishida M, Mayden RL, Miya M (2011) Evidence from mitochondrial genomics supports the lower Mesozoic of South Asia as the time and place of basal divergence of cypriniform fishes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00651.x
  • Saitoh K, Sado T, Mayden RL, Hanzawa N, Nakamura K, Nishida M, Miya M (2006) Mitogenomic evolution and interrelationships of the Cypriniformes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi): the first evidence toward resolution of higher-level relationships of the world’s largest freshwater fish clade based on 59 whole mitogenome sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 63: 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-005-0293-y
  • Serov DV, Nezdoliy VK, Pavlov DS (2006) The Freshwater Fishes of Central Vietnam. Scientific Press, Moscow, 363 pp.
  • Sui XY, Yan YZ, Chen YF (2012) Age growth, and reproduction of Opsariichthys bidens (Cyprinidae) from the Qingyi river at Huangshan Mountain, China. Zoological Studies 51: 476–483.
  • Swofford DL (2002) PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), v. 4.0 beta 10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • Takeuchi H (2012) Phylogeny of the cyprinid subfamily Cultrinae and related taxa (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). PhD thesis, Nara, Japan: Kindai University.
  • Takeuchi H, Tokuda K, Kanagawa N, Hosoya K (2011) Cephalic lateral line canal system of the golden venus chub, Hemigrammocypris rasborella (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). Ichthyological Research 58: 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-010-0203-1
  • Tanaka S (1970) Studies on the growth of “Hasu,” Opsariichthys uncirostris, in Lake Biwa I. On the body length at each age and the growth curve estimated from the spawning populations. Japanese Journal of Ecology 20: 13–25.
  • Tang KL, Agnew MK, Hirt MV, Lumbantobing DN, Raley ME, Sado T, Teoh V-H, Yang L, Bart HL, Harris PH, He S, Miya M, Saitoh K, Simons AM, Wood RM, Mayden RL (2013) Limits and phylogenetic relationships of East Asian fishes in the subfamily Oxygastrinae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Zootaxa 3681: 101–135. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.2.1
  • Tang KL, Agnew MK, Hirt MV, Sado T, Schneider LM, Freyhof J, Sulaiman Z, Swartz E, Vidthayanon C, Miya M, Saitoh K, Simons AM, Wood RM, Mayden RL (2010) Systematics of the subfamily Danioninae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.05.021
  • Temminck CJ, Schlegel H (1846) Pisces. In: Siebold PF (Ed.) Fauna Japonica. Lugduni Batavorum 314 pp.
  • Xing YC, Zhao YH, Zhang J, Wang YF, Zhao XR, Zhang CG, Wang BL, Chang BQ, Zhang LJ, Hu YJ (2007) Growth and diets of Zacco platypus distributed in Beijing. Acta Zoologica Sinica 53: 982–993.
  • Wang C, Chen Q, Lu G, Xu J, Yang Q, Li S (2008) Complete mitochondrial genome of the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella, Teleostei): insight into its phylogenic position within Cyprinidae. Gene 424: 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2008.07.011
  • Yin W, Cao K, He H, Fu C (2015) Four complete mitochondrial genomes of the genera Candidia, Opsariichthys, and Zacco (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA. Part A, DNA Mapping, Sequencing and Analysis 27: 4613–4614. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1101582
login to comment