Research Article |
Corresponding author: Zhen Liu ( qingniao8.27@163.com ) Corresponding author: Andrew Polaszek ( a.polaszek@nhm.ac.uk ) Academic editor: Kees van Achterberg
© 2024 Zhen Liu, Andrew Polaszek.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Liu Z, Polaszek A (2024) Afrotropical Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with description of four new species. ZooKeys 1216: 83-100. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1216.133127
|
The braconid parasitoid wasp genus Centistidea Rohwer, 1914 is revised for the Afrotropical region, with four new species described; Centistidea areolaris Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov., C. linearis Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov., C. longipedes Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov., and C. turneri Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov. are described based on specimens from the Natural History Museum, United Kingdom, and the Royal Museum for Central Africa, Belgium. An illustrated key to species in the Afrotropical region is provided.
Africa, leaf-miner, Miracinae, Mirax, new taxa
Miracinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) are quite rare in all collections worldwide, with only 70 species known from all geographical regions (
Here we describe four new species of Centistidea from Cameroon, South Africa, and Uganda, together with a preliminary revision of this group in the Afrotropical region as part of our ongoing project on worldwide Miracinae.
Specimens studied are deposited in the Natural History Museum, UK (
1 | Propodeum with lateral carinae alongside median longitudinal carina, and with reticulate sculpture between lateral carinae (Fig. |
2 |
– | Propodeum without lateral carinae alongside median longitudinal carina, at most with indistinct punctures anterolaterally (e.g. Figs |
3 |
2 | Scutellar sulcus greatly reduced and not impressed; temple obliquely narrowed behind eyes; vein 1-CU1 as long as 2-CU1 | C. africana (Brues, 1926) |
– | Scutellar sulcus obviously depressed (Fig. |
C. areolaris Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov. |
3 | Scutellar sulcus not depressed (Fig. |
C. leucopterae (Wilkinson, 1936) |
– | Scutellar sulcus obviously depressed, even when with crenualation (e.g. Fig. |
4 |
4 | Propodeum rugulose with median carina bifurcated at apical third (Fig. |
C. mubilibana (de Saeger, 1944) |
– | Propodeum smooth with median carina bifurcated medially (e.g. Fig. |
5 |
5 | Medio-posterior depressions of scutellum distinctly separated (Fig. |
6 |
– | Medio-posterior depressions of scutellum touching each other (Figs |
7 |
6 | Vein 1-SR of fore wing absent; vein r of fore wing very prominent; median longitudinal carina bifurcated at middle of propodeum | C. tihamica Ahmad & Pandey, 2019 |
– | Vein 1-SR of fore wing present (Fig. |
C. linearis Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov. |
7 | Propodeum with regular short transverse rugae along median carina (Fig. |
C. longipedes Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov. |
– | Propodeum without regular short rugae along median carina (Fig. |
C. turneri Liu & Polaszek, sp. nov. |
Mirax africana Brues, 1926: 292. Holotype in Durban Museum and Art Gallery, Durban, South Africa (not examined).
Mirax africana:
Body length 1.7 mm, yellow-brown; occiput deeply emarginate; head matte, without median groove on vertex; ocelli in small equilateral triangle, about the distance to each eye; antenna shorter than body, first three flagellomeres of equal length, the fourth and following becoming shorter and more slender; notauli very distinct anteriorly, less so behind; mesoscutum and central part of scutellum minutely granular, matte; scutellar sulcus greatly reduced and not impressed; scutellum depressed at sides, with a large subtriangular, smooth, margined impression on each side, and a pair of small round foveae at apex, the two enclosed together in an oval margined line; propodeum with distinct median and a lateral longitudinal carina, more or less irregularly reticulate between the carinae, more coarsely posteriorly; T1 narrow; pterostigma less than half as wide as long, with vein r emitted from its middle, 1-CU1 as long as 2-CU1 (following
South Africa.
Unknown.
No specimens were available for this study.
Body length 2.0 mm, light red-brown; eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple smooth, superficially punctate, indistinctly constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; hind ocelli in a shallow depression, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.2 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.3:1.0:2.9; vertex between eye and hind ocellus nearly smooth except some extremely fine transverse wrinkles; face nearly polished except some punctures along eyes, not convex medially, 1.5 × wider than high; antenna nearly as long as body length, with 1st, 2nd, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 4.9, 5.5, 2.7 and 3.0 × longer than wide, 1st indistinctly longer than 2nd; mesoscutum with superficial and weakly-defined punctures anteriorly and laterally, largely smooth dorsally, notauli less obvious, weakly crenulated near to anterior 1/3; scutellar sulcus concave but not crenulated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum large and oblong, both enclosed by a margined line; propodeum with distinct median carina and carinate-areolate elements medio-apically; pterostigma narrow, 2.9 × as long as its widest part; vein 1-R1 attenuated to 0.3 of length of pterostigma; T1 3.9 × longer than its maximum width, radially striate at lateral membranous area; T2 triangular part 1.3 × wider than median length; T3 1.9 × longer than T2.
Female. Body length 2.0 mm, fore wing length 2.5 mm (Fig.
Head. 1.8 × as wide as long, 1.2 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
Mesosoma. Length:width:height = 1.4:1.0:1.2. Mesoscutum (Fig.
Legs. Hind femur (Fig.
Wings. Fore wing (Fig.
Metasoma. 0.9 × length of mesosoma. T1 (Fig.
Colour. Light red-brown, except apex of metasoma darker brown (Fig.
Male. Unknown.
Unknown.
(
South Africa.
The specific name “areolaris” refers to the propodeum with carinate-areolate elements medio-apically.
This species is similar to the Neotropical species, C. vertus (Papp, 2013). Its peculiar propodeum is very rare in Miracinae with both median carina and areola present, but differs in the following: antenna slightly shorter than body length, with penultimate flagellomere 2.7 × longer than wide (antenna 1.2 × longer than body length, with penultimate flagellomere 4.0 × longer than wide in C. vertus); medio-posterior depressions on scutellum distinct in an enclosed oval margined line (absent in C. vertus); and T2 gradually wider basally (narrowly parallel-sided basally in C. vertus).
Mirax leucopterae
Wilkinson, 1936: 385. Holotype in
Mirax leucopterae:
Body length 1.5–2.0 mm, mostly black (Fig.
Holotype : • 1♀, [Tanzania] Tanganyika T[erritory], Bukoba, Nyakato, AH Ritchie, 24.VIII.1935, ex Leucoptera daricella on Pavetta ternifolia, type No. B.M.TYPE HYM. 3.C.1131, No. NHMUK010639681; paratypes: • 9♂♂, same data as holotype Nos. NHMUK010635732, 010639360, 010639353, 010639367, 010639480, 010639377, 010639403, 010639362, 010639384.
• 3♀♀3♂♂, Madagascar, Fianarantsoa, 19.III.1968, C.I.E. A2287, ex Leucoptera, det. Nixon, 1968, Nos. NHMUK010639677 (2), 010639678 (2), 010639679 (2); • 3♀♀, Madagascar, Tulear Berenty 12 km, N.W. Amboasary, JS Noyes, MC Day, 5-15.V.1983, B.M.1983-201, Nos. NHMUK010639735, 010639730, 010639744; • 1♀, Kenya, Diani Beach, VII.1951, NLH Krauss, B.M.1951-541, No. NHMUK010639745; • 1♀, South Africa, Port St. John, Pondoland, 25-31.III.1923, RE Tuner, Brit.Mus. 1923-241, No. NHMUK010639726; • 1♀3♂♂, Zimbabwe Chipinga Dist., Masasimn, 20.VII.1990, ex larvae of Leucoptera meyricki, IIE 21643, det. AK Walker, 1991, No. NHMUK010639680.
Crobylophora daricella [Pavetta ternifolia], Leucoptera sp. [Cremaspora, Cremaspora hirsutus, pavetta], Leucoptera coffeella, and Leucoptera coma (
New records for Kenya, Madagascar, South Africa, Zimbabwe; Democratic Republic of Congo, Tanzania.
Body length 2.6 mm, dark brown; head 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.5 × wider than mesoscutum; eyes 2.0 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple slightly shiny, small setose punctures with transverse wrinkles in between, not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.5 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.3:1.0:3.1; clypeus 1.6 × wider than medial length, weakly defined punctate; antenna 1.2 × longer than body length, with 1st, 2nd, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 5.2, 4.9, 4.1 and 4.3 × longer than wide, 1st about as long as 2nd; mesoscutum with superficial and extremely small punctures, intervals with extremely fine wrinkles, notauli obvious, crenulated near to anterior 1/2; scutellar sulcus slightly curved, indistinctly crenulated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum large and oblong, interval 3/4 of depression diameter; propodeum with distinct median carinae reaching beyond weak defined costulae, anterior parts with indistinct punctures anteriorly except wrinkles elsewhere as posterior parts, anterior part 2.8 × longer than median length of metanotum; vein 1-R1 0.3 of length of pterostigma; T1 2.8 × longer than its maximum width; T2 2.6 × wider than median length; T3 1.7 × longer than T2.
Female. Body length 2.6 mm, fore wing length 2.6 mm (Fig.
Head. Transverse in dorsal view, 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.5 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 2.0 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
Mesosoma. Length:width:height = 10:4.2:6.3. Mesoscutum (Fig.
Legs. Hind femur (Fig.
Wings. Fore wing (Fig.
Metasoma. Indistinctly longer than mesosoma. T1 (Fig.
Colour. Dark brown, except metasoma more or less brown dorsally (Fig.
Male. Unknown.
Unknown.
(
Cameroon.
The specific name “linearis” derives from the Latin, referring to the fine wrinkles on head and mesosoma.
This species is similar to C. africana but differs in the following: antenna 1.3 × longer than body (antenna shorter than body in C. africana); medio-posterior depressions on scutellum oblong, far away from each other, interval 3/4 of depression diameter (oval and close to each other in C. africana); and scutellar sulcus indistinctly crenulated (not crenulated or concave in C. africana).
Body length 2.2 mm, dark brown; head 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.3 × wider than mesoscutum; eyes 1.5 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple with transverse wrinkles in between, not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.2 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.2:1.0:3.2; frons flat and nearly polished except extremely fine transverse wrinkles; vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and sculptured as temple; face shiny, with extremely fine setose punctures, indistinctly convex medially, transverse, 1.4 × wider than high; clypeus 2.2 × wider than medial length, nearly polished; antenna 1.2 × longer than body length, with 1st, 2nd, penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 6.3, 6.7, 3.8, and 4.6 × longer than wide, 1st 1.1 × longer than 2nd; mesoscutum with superficial and extremely small punctures, intervals with extremely fine wrinkles, notauli obvious, crenulated to anterior 1/3; scutellar sulcus straight and crenulated; medio-posterior depressions on scutellum large and oblong, virtually touching each other; propodeum with distinct median carinae just reach costulae, anterior parts with indistinct punctures and several short rugae alongside median carinae, 2.5 × longer than median length of metanotum, posterior parts polished; hind leg extremely long, 2.6 × than metasoma; pterostigma narrow, 3.7 × as long as its widest part; vein 1-R1 0.3 of length of pterostigma; T1 poorly defined, 2.8 × longer than its maximum width; T2 1.2 × wider than median length; T3 0.9 × length of T2, not longitudinally striate.
Male. Body length 2.2 mm, fore wing length 2.6 mm (Fig.
Head. Transverse in dorsal view, 1.7 × as wide as long, 1.3 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 1.5 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
Mesosoma. Length:width:height = 10:4.6:6.5. Mesoscutum (Fig.
Legs. Hind leg (Fig.
Wings. Fore wing (Fig.
Metasoma. Indistinctly longer than mesosoma. T1 (Fig.
Colour. Dark brown (Fig.
Female. Unknown.
Unknown.
(
Cameroon, Uganda.
The specific name “longipedes” derives from Latin, referring to the extremely long hind legs.
This species is similar to C. leucopterae (Wilkinson, 1936) but differs in the following: temple not constricted behind eyes in dorsal view (distinctly constricted in C. leucopterae); T2 1.2 × wider than median length (3.3 × wider in C. leucopterae); and T3 polished (longitudinally striate in C. leucopterae).
Mirax mubilibana
de Saeger, 1944: 34. Holotype in
Mirax mubilibana:
Body length 2–3 mm, colour variable, mostly black; face, vertex and occiput very finely punctate, shiny; temple smooth; eyes a third longer than wide; length of the ocellar triangle approximately equal to the distance which separates it from each eye; antenna nearly as long as body, 1st flagellomere a little longer and thinner than the following; mesoscutum regularly and finely punctate, more densely than the face, more sparsely laterally and disc of the scutellum, notauli present anteriorly; scutellar sulcus weakly arched, narrow and foveated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum very small, round; propodeum rough, with carinae arranged as in M. leucopterae, but median carinae more wide, more or less divided, the apical area comprises approximately a third the length of propodeum; vein r almost completely absent; T1 2.5 × longer than its greatest width, striate or rugose; T2 smooth and shiny, with a small tubercle basal medially; T2 and T3 of the same length; T3 with slightly stronger longitudinal aciculation than T2; ovipositor sheath a little shorter than metatarsus III.
Unknown.
(
Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda.
Centistidea tihamica Ahmad & Pandey, 2019: 43. Holotype in the Insect Collection of the Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India (not examined).
Body length 1.8 mm, mostly yellow-brown; length of eye 1.5 × temple in dorsal view; head and vertex indistinctly punctate; 1st flagellomere 1.25 × longer than 2nd; penultimate flagellomere 2.5–3.0 × as long as wide; mesoscutum shiny with few distinct punctures, notauli only anteriorly impressed; scutellar sulcus distinct, present as a narrow groove and crenulated; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum semicircular and separated (from the original image); propodeum almost smooth with a complete median longitudinal carina bifurcate posteriorly, median carina of propodeum absent behind level of costulae; pterostigma with a long slender, apical expansion, 2.2 × longer than wide; vein r very prominent and 0.2 × as long as the height of pterostigma; vein 1-SR absent (from the original image); T1 4.0 × as long as its maximum width; T2 subtriangular, smooth, laterally membranous, and longitudinally striated; T3 longitudinally striated; ovipositor sheaths 0.15 × as long as fore wing (following
Unknown.
Saudi Arabia. Although not strictly in the Afrotropical region, the species is included here for future reference, in case it should eventually be discovered in the region.
No specimens were available for this study.
Body length 1.7 mm, light red-brown; eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view; temple smooth, superficially punctate, a little constricted behind eyes in dorsal view; hind ocelli in a shallow depression, distance between fore and a hind ocellus 1.3 × longer than minor axis of a hind ocellus, POL:OD:OOL = 1.5:1.0:2.5; vertex between eye and hind ocellus shiny and polished; face polished, 1.4 × wider than high; antenna slightly shorter than body length, with penultimate and ultimate flagellomeres 2.2 and 2.5 × longer than wide, 1st slightly longer (1.1 ×) than 2nd; mesoscutum with superficial and fine dense punctures anteriorly and laterally, more shallow and sparser dorsally, notauli hardly visible, only slightly depressed at anterior extremity; scutellar sulcus slightly curved, shallowly concave without crenulation; medio-posterior depressions of scutellum oblong, touching each other; propodeum with median carina reaching half way to hind margin, and bifurcated to two-thirds of lateral margin, largely polished elsewhere; pterostigma 2.8 × as long as its widest part, vein 1-R1 virtually absent; T1 polished, 2.5 × longer than its maximum width, strongly narrowed anterior-medially; T2 1.9 × wider than median length, not longitudinally striate at lateral membranous area; T3 1.4 × longer than T2, weakly longitudinally striate.
Female. Body length 1.7 mm, fore wing length 1.8 mm (Fig.
Head. Transverse in dorsal view, 1.8 × as wide as long, 1.3 × wider than mesoscutum. Eyes 1.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view (Fig.
Mesosoma. Length:width:height = 1.8:1.0:1.3. Mesoscutum (Fig.
Legs. Hind femur (Fig.
Wings. Fore wing (Fig.
Metasoma. Nearly as long as mesosoma. T1 (Fig.
Colour. Light red-brown, terga posterior to T3 dark brown (Fig.
Variation. Body colour varying from light yellow to dark brown on trunk of body among specimens. Specimens from Mossel Bay and Ceres from Cape Province tend to be darker when compared with the light yellow specimens from Pondoland of Port St. John in South Africa and Uganda. Body length varies from very small (1.2 mm) to large (2.2 mm).
Male. Similar to female, but body smaller with darker metasoma and longer antenna.
Leaf-miner in castor (Ricinus communis).
(
South Africa, Uganda.
The specific name “turneri” expresses our gratitude to the late R.E. Turner for the large quantity of this species collected in South Africa.
From a short apical extension of the pterostigma to distinctly longer and equaling the length of pterostigma, vein 1-R1 is often present in Centistidea. In this species, however, it is absent compare to its Afrotropical allies; it is similar to C. mubilibana (de Saeger, 1944) for the carination of propodeum but differs in the following: length of the ocellar triangle nearly half of the distance which separates it from each eye (approximately equal in C. mubilibana); vein 1-SR present (almost completely absent in C. mubilibana); and T1 polished (striate or rugose in C. mubilibana).
We are grateful to the collectors for their efforts in the field. We also thank Dr Gavin Broad, Natural History Museum, UK and Dr Stéphane Hanot from Royal Museum for Central Africa, Belgium for their help during the course of this study.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
Funding for this study was provided by the China Scholarship Council (202208430072), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (23B0654) and Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2023JJ30434).
Conceptualization: AP, ZL. Data curation: AP, ZL. Formal analysis: ZL. Funding acquisition: ZL. Supervision: AP. Writing - original draft: ZL. Writing - review and editing: AP.
Zhen Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8670-0205
Andrew Polaszek https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-3353
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main.