Research Article |
Corresponding author: Laure Kaiser ( laure.kaiser-arnauld@egce.cnrs-gif.fr ) Academic editor: Michael Sharkey
© 2017 Laure Kaiser, Jose Fernandez-Triana, Claire Capdevielle-Dulac, Célina Chantre, Matthieu Bodet, Ferial Kaoula, Romain Benoist, Paul-André Calatayud, Stéphane Dupas, Elisabeth A. Herniou, Rémi Jeannette, Julius Obonyo, Jean-François Silvain, Bruno Le Ru.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Kaiser L, Fernandez-Triana J, Capdevielle-Dulac C, Chantre C, Bodet M, Kaoula F, Benoist R, Calatayud P, Dupas S, Herniou EA, Jeannette R, Obonyo J, Silvain JF, Le Ru B (2017) Systematics and biology of Cotesia typhae sp. n. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae), a potential biological control agent against the noctuid Mediterranean corn borer, Sesamia nonagrioides. ZooKeys 682: 105-136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.682.13016
|
Many parasitoid species are subjected to strong selective pressures from their host, and their adaptive response may result in the formation of genetically differentiated populations, called host races. When environmental factors and reproduction traits prevent gene flow, host races become distinct species. Such a process has recently been documented within the Cotesia flavipes species complex, all of which are larval parasitoids of moth species whose larvae are stem borers of Poales. A previous study on the African species C. sesamiae, incorporating molecular, ecological and biological data on various samples, showed that a particular population could be considered as a distinct species, because it was specialized at both host (Sesamia nonagrioides) and plant (Typha domingensis) levels, and reproductively isolated from other C. sesamiae. Due to its potential for the biological control of S. nonagrioides, a serious corn pest in Mediterranean countries and even in Iran, we describe here Cotesia typhae Fernandez-Triana sp. n. The new species is characterized on the basis of morphological, molecular, ecological and geographical data, which proved to be useful for future collection and rapid identification of the species within the species complex. Fecundity traits and parasitism success on African and European S. nonagrioides populations, estimated by laboratory studies, are also included.
Cotesia , Sesamia , biological control, species complex, Africa, Mediterranean
Although the concept of species is questioned in situations characterized by a continuum of genetic differentiation and reproductive isolation between populations (
Cotesia is one of the most diverse genera of the subfamily Microgastrinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), with almost 300 species already described (
The Cotesia flavipes species-group is a monophyletic complex made up of (until now) four allopatric sister species, all gregarious endoparasitoids of a few families of lepidopteran stem borers (Crambidae, Pyralidae, and Noctuidae) in monocot Poales (Poaceae, Typhaceae and Cyperaceae). The species-group comprises Cotesia chilonis (Munakata, 1912) from eastern Asia, including China, Japan and Indonesia; Cotesia flavipes (Cameron, 1891), from the Indian sub-continent, but also released and established in east Africa and the New World for the purpose of biological control; Cotesia nonagriae (Olliff, 1893), an Australian endemic recently removed from synonymy with C. flavipes (
Additional, cryptic species have been suspected within this complex and several papers have explored this possibility, especially in regard to C. flavipes (e.g.,
Based on a wealth of information – morphological, molecular, biological, and ecological – we describe this new species of Cotesia from Africa, the fifth member of the flavipes complex, and present the first data showing that it is a successful parasitoid of European populations of S. nonagrioides, a major maize pest in West Africa and in Mediterranean countries.
We studied 175 specimens from six different countries, representing ten populations from four out of the five known species within the flavipes complex (Table
Species | Country of origin | Collecting year | # of Specimens | Host caterpillar/host plant |
---|---|---|---|---|
C. flavipes | Trinidad | 1972 & 1980 | 4 F, 3 M | Diatraea lineolata /unknown |
C. flavipes | Colombia | 1978 | 2 F, 7 M | Unknown/unknown |
C. flavipes | Barbados | 1977 | 2 F | Unknown/sugar cane |
C. flavipes | India | 1954 | 3 F | Unknown/unknown |
C. flavipes | Kenya | 2010 | 25 F, 5 M | Chilo partellus/maize |
C. sesamiae | Kenya (Mombasa) | 2010 | 25 F, 5 M | Sesamia calamistis /maize |
C. sesamiae | Kenya (Kitale) | 2012 | 25 F, 5 M | Busseola fusca/maize |
C. chilo | Japan | 2008 | 2 F, 2 M | Unknown/rice |
C. typhae sp. n. | Kenya (Makindu) | 2013 | 25 F, 5 M |
Sesamia nonagrioides/ Typha domingensis |
C. typhae sp. n. | Kenya (Kobodo) | 2013 | 25 F, 5 M |
Sesamia nonagrioides/ Cyperus dives |
We evaluated a number of morphological characters proposed in previous studies (
In the species description, body ratios and measurement values are presented for the holotype first, followed by the range within the species in parentheses.
Photos were taken with a Keyence VHX-1000 Digital Microscope, using a lens with a range of 10–130 ×. Multiple images were taken of a structure through the focal plane and then combined to produce a single in-focus image using the software associated with the Keyence System. Plates were prepared using Microsoft PowerPoint 2010.
Institution acronyms used:
CBGP Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations, Montpellier, France.
In order to check the molecular-specific characterization of Cotesia typhae, we used the COI (cytochrome oxydase I) sequences from
Knowing that the new Cotesia species was found exclusively on S. nonagrioides on two plant families, Typhaceae and Cyperaceae (
Insect material
The C. typhae laboratory-reared strains were collected initially from Kenya localities (Kobodo: 0.68°S; 34.41°E or Luanda: 0.48°S; 34.30°E, depending on the availability of the strains). They were reared on a Kenyan S. nonagrioides strain (collected initially from Makindu: 2.28°S; 37.82°E), according to the method described by
Longevity experiments
Clusters of cocoons were each placed in a 0.5L disposable plastic box with a 1.5 cm diameter opening clogged with a foam cork. One of the three following food sources was placed in the box to test their effects on longevity: honey droplets and a tap water-imbibed cotton ball; a cotton ball imbibed with a 2% saccharose solution or a 20% solution. These small cages were placed at 21°C, with internal relative humidity around 75%. Dead insects were counted every day for the 2% sugar solution and at least every two days for the two other food sources, from 24h following emergence.
Realized fecundity
One-day-old wasps were taken from the cages as above and allowed to oviposit in one host larva per day, for four days. Parasitized larvae were kept individually in Petri dishes (2 cm high) with approximately 10cm3 piece of diet, until emergence of the parasitoid larvae or pupation. The diet was replaced by a piece of toilet paper 12 days after parasitism to facilitate cocoon formation.
Parasitoid success
Four weeks after hatching, i.e. when reaching the 5th- 6th stadium, larvae were exposed each to one wasp, then kept fed with the diet, in the conditions described above, until emergence of the parasitoid larvae, or pupation. Recorded traits are specified in Table
Data analyses
Kaplan Meyer tables from XLSTAT were used to estimate daily mortality and median longevity. The procedure included three tests of equality of the survival curves (Wilcoxon, Log-rank and Tarone-War) that gave identical P-values, so only Wilcoxon’s result is given in this study. Comparisons of traits of parasitoid success on the three host strains were performed with the R package. As some of the traits did not follow a normal distribution (Shapiro statistic) or did not fulfill homoscedasticity (Bartlett statistic), the Kruskal-Wallis statistic was used to compare the quantitative traits recorded for the three host strains, followed by the Dunn post-hoc multiple comparison test. Chi-square was used to compare the issue of parasitism. Sample sizes are given in Table
Female (CBGP).
Kenya, Makindu, 2.28°S, 37.82°E.
Kenya, Makindu, xi.2010, ex Sesamia nonagrioides on Typha domingensis Pers. Voucher code: CNC634434. Other code on label: F78.
CBGP, Montferrier s/Lez, France;
This species has been referred to as the C. sesamiae population, harbouring Cs Snona haplotype on CrV1 locus (
Cotesia typhae, holotype, female specimen from Makindu, Kenya. A Habitus, lateral view B Head, frontal view (arrow shows face projection between antennal base) C Wings D Head and mesosoma (partially), lateral view E Propodeum and metasoma, dorsal view F Mesosoma and metasoma, lateral view G Head, mesosoma and tergites 1-2, dorsal view (arrow shows anteromesoscutum punctures).
Cotesia typhae, paratype, female specimen from Kobodo, Kenya. A Habitus, lateral view B Head, frontal view (arrow shows face projection between antennal base) C Wings D Metasoma, dorsal view E Head and mesosoma, dorsal view (arrow shows anteromesoscutum punctures) F Metasoma, lateral view.
The new Cotesia is relatively distinct from other members of the flavipes complex (Table
Cotesia chilonis, female specimen from Takatsuki, Japan. A Habitus, lateral view B Head, frontal view C Wings D Antennae, front and middle legs, lateral view E Head, lateral view F Propodeum, tergites 1-2, dorsal view G Mesosoma and metasoma, lateral view H Mesosoma and metasoma, dorsal view.
Diagnostic characters within the Cotesia flavipes complex. Data on host caterpillar species from
Cotesia chilonis | Cotesia flavipes | Cotesia nonagriae | Cotesia sesamiae | Cotesia typhae | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scutoscutellar sulcus | Straight (Fig. |
Curved (Fig. |
Curved | Curved (Fig. |
Curved (Figs |
Antero-mesoscutum (AMS) punctures | Large punctures (diameter larger than distance between punctures) in most of AMS, including most of the posterior half (Fig. |
Relatively small punctures on anterior half of AMS, posterior half almost entirely smooth (Fig. |
Relatively small punctures on anterior half of AMS, posterior half almost entirely smooth | Relatively small punctures on anterior half of AMS, posterior half almost entirely smooth (Figs |
Large punctures (diameter larger than distance between punctures) in most of AMS, including most of the posterior half (Fig. |
Face projection between antennal base | Acute, triangular projection with clearly impressed median longitudinal sulcus (Fig. |
Acute projection (sometimes projection less acute, margin almost straight) with clearly impressed median longitudinal sulcus (Fig. |
More or less straight margin, with no clearly impressed, median longitudinal sulcus | Acute projection (sometimes projection less acute, margin almost straight) with clearly impressed median longitudinal sulcus (Figs |
Acute, triangular projection with clearly impressed median longitudinal sulcus (Fig. |
Paramere length (observed externally, without removing genitalia from specimen) | Short, around 1.0 × as long as median length of sternite 8 (partially visible in Fig. |
Large, clearly more than 1.5 × (usually up to 2.0x) as long as median length of sternite 8 (Fig. |
Large, clearly more than 1.5 × (usually up to 2.0x) as long as median length of sternite 8 | Short, around 1.0 × as long as median length of sternite 8 (Fig. |
Relatively large, around 1.5 × as long as median length of sternite 8 (Fig. |
Paramere shape | Rather uniformly narrowing from base to rounded apex | Rather uniformly narrowing from base to rounded apex (Fig. |
Rather uniformly narrowing from base to rounded apex | Rather uniformly narrowing from base to rounded apex (Fig. |
With a broad, widened area near apex (Fig. |
Antennal flagellomeres | Relatively short (3+ about as long as wide) |
Relatively short (2+ about as long as wide) |
Relatively short (2+ about as long as wide) |
Relatively short (3+ about as long as wide) |
Relatively long (1–4 much longer than wide) |
Natural known hosts |
Chilo supressalis, C. partellus (Crambidae) |
More than 7 species (Crambidae & Noctuidae) | Bathytricha truncata (Noctuidae) | More than 34 species (mostly Noctuidae & Crambidae) | Sesamia nonagrioides (Noctuidae) |
Head and mesosoma mostly dark brown to black (except for scape, pedicel, wing base and tegula yellow; antennal flagellomeres brown; mandibles and labrums orange-yellow, and face projection between antennal base usually light brown); legs mostly yellow (except for metafemur with brown dorsal tip on posterior 0.1, and metatarsus light brown to brown); metasoma mostly yellow-brown to yellow-orange (except for mediotergites 1 and 2 dark brown to black, and mediotergites 3+ usually with brown spot centrally, near anterior margin). Wings with veins mostly brown, pterostigma brown with pale spot on anterior 0.3.
Head wider than high; face with acute, triangular projection between antennal base, the projection with clearly impressed median longitudinal sulcus; head dorsally smooth; gena laterally and dorsally as wide or wider than eye width; anteromesoscutum with relatively deep, coarse and large punctures (puncture diameter larger than distance between punctures), puncture density similar on most of the anteromesoscutum, including posterior half; scutoscutellar sulcus strongly curved, with 10-12 impressions; scutellar disc mostly smooth, with shallow and sparse punctures; propodeum mostly sculptured with an irregular pattern of strong carinae; mediotergites 1-2 mostly covered by strong longitudinal striae, mediotergites 3+ mostly smooth; hypopygium relatively small, apical tip in lateral view shorter than apical tip of tergites; paramere with broad, widened area near apex; paramere relatively large, around 1.50 × as long as median length of sternite 8.
Body ratios. Length of flagellomere 2/length of flagellomere 14: 1.71 × (1.50–1.86). Metafemur length/width: 3.06 × (2.92–3.25). Length of inner spur of metatibia/length of first segment of metatarsus: 0.48 × (0.46–0.52). Length of inner spur of metatibia/length of outer spur of metatibia: 1.07 × (1.07–1.18). Pterostigma length/width: 2.81 × (2.61–2.88). Length of fore wing vein r/length of fore wing vein 2RS: 0.82 × (0.82–1.00). Mediotergite 1 length/mediotergite width at posterior margin: 1.07 × (0.93–1.20). Length of mediotergite 2/length of mediotergite 3: 0.89 × (0.83–1.00).
Body measurements (all in mm). Body length: 2.40 (2.20–2.50). Fore wing length: 2.10 (2.10–2.20). Length of antennal flagellomere (F), F1: 0.15 (0.14–0.17), F2: 0.12 (0.12–0.13), F3: 0.11 (0.10–0.11), F14: 0.07 (0.06–0.08), F15: 0.07 (0.06–0.08), F16: 0.10 (0.09–0.11). Metafemur length: 0.55 (0.51–0.56). Metafemur width: 0.18 (0.16–0.19). Metatibia length: 0.71 (0.66–0.74). First segment of metatarsus length: 0.31 (0.28–0.31). Length of inner spur of metatibia: 0.15 (0.13–0.16). Length of outer spur of metatibia: 0.14 (0.11–0.14). Ovipositor sheaths length: 0.18 (0.15–0.18). Pterostigma length: 0.45 (0.145–0.49). Pterostigma width: 0.16 (0.16–0.18). Length of fore wing vein r: 0.09 (0.09–0.11). Length of fore wing 2RS: 0.11 (0.10–0.12). Length of mediotergite 1: 0.30 (0.27–0.31). Width at posterior margin of mediotergite 1: 0.28 (0.25–0.32). Length of mediotergite 2: 0.16 (0.14–0.20). Length of mediotergite 3: 0.18 (0.15–0.20).
Named after the main host plant on which the wasp parasitizes its host caterpillar,
Cotesia typhae occurs sympatrically with C. sesamiae and C. flavipes (the latter introduced into Africa). Among these three species, typhae is the largest (body and fore wing lengths usually 0.2–0.3 mm longer than the two others), it also has a more sculptured anteromesoscutum and a longer antenna (especially flagellomeres 1–4 which are significantly longer).
Between species, pairwise divergence of COI sequences ranged from 2.6% to 4.2%, and distances observed between C. typhae and the other C. sesamiae species fell in this range Table
Minimum and maximum divergence of COI sequences between all pairs of species.
C. typhae | C. sesamiae | C. flavipes | C. chilonis | |
---|---|---|---|---|
C. typhae | 0–0.002 | |||
C. sesamiae | 0.026–0.035 | 0–0.028 | ||
C. flavipes | 0.033–0.035 | 0.031–0.042 | 0 | |
C. chilonis | 0.035 | 0.030–0.037 | 0.037 | 0 |
Among the ten sampled countries and 65 sampled localities hosting S. nonagrioides on Typhaceae and Cyperaceae, larvae parasitized by C. typhae were found in the three most sampled countries (highest numbers of localities and collected larvae), Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania (Table
Presence of Cotesia typhae in the sampled countries. Results of collections of S. nonagrioides in sub-Saharan Africa from 2004 to 2013. For each country the Table shows the number of localities containing Typhaceae and Cyperaceae plants, the total number of S. nonagrioides larvae collected there during the period, and whether some were parasitized by C. typhae.
Country | Number of sampled localities with Typhaceae & Cyperaceae | Number of S. nonagrioides larvae | presence of Cotesia typhae |
---|---|---|---|
Benin | 1 | 26 | no |
Botswana | 1 | 2 | no |
Cameroun | 1 | 1 | no |
Ethiopia | 5 | 167 | YES |
Kenya | 26 | 1253 | YES |
R. Congo | 2 | 38 | no |
R.D.C. | 2 | 26 | no |
Rwanda | 1 | 7 | no |
Tanzania | 18 | 463 | YES |
Tanzania, Pemba | 1 | 1 | no |
Tanzania, Zanzibar | 3 | 25 | no |
Uganda | 4 | 26 | no |
We then estimated the percentage of parasitized S. nonagrioides in the localities where the parasitoid was present. It varied from less than five to more than 70 % (Table
Percentage of parasitism of S. nonagrioides larvae in the localities where C. typhae was found.
Country | Locality | Latitude / Longitude | EDate | Plant species | Nbr S. n. larvae | % parasitism |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHIOPIA | Awasa | 7.05°N, 38.47°E | Nov.-04 | T. domingensis | 64 | 6.3% |
ETHIOPIA | Chamoleto | 5.93°N, 37.53°E | Nov.-04 | T. domingensis | 16 | 18.8% |
ETHIOPIA | Omolante | 6.16°N, 37.67°E | Nov.-04 | T. domingensis | 27 | 22.2% |
KENYA | Kabuto | 0.35°S, 34.96°E | May-12 | C. dives | 6 | 33.3% |
KENYA | Kobodo | 0.86°S, 34.57°E | March-13 | C. dives | 42 | 7.1% |
KENYA | Makindu | 2.28°S, 37.82°E | Nov.-10 | T. domingensis | 65 | 10.8% |
KENYA | Makindu | 2.28°S, 37.82°E | Feb.-11 | T. domingensis | 64 | 4.7% |
KENYA | Masimba | 2.15°S, 37.58°E | Dec.-06 | T. domingensis | 10 | 30.0% |
KENYA | Masimba | 2.15°S, 37.58°E | Apr.-08 | T. domingensis | 13 | 15.4% |
KENYA | Mbita Lwanda | 0.89°S, 34.67°E | Feb.-05 | T. domingensis | 68 | 27.9% |
KENYA | Mbita Lwanda | 0.89°S, 34.67°E | Oct.-08 | T. domingensis | 147 | 10.2% |
KENYA | Mbita Lwanda | 0.89°S, 34.67°E | June-07 | T. domingensis | 18 | 72.2% |
KENYA | Mbita Lwanda | 0.89°S, 34.67°E | March-13 | T. domingensis | 59 | 8.5% |
KENYA | Rabuor | 0.43°S, 34.91°E | March-13 | C. dives | 10 | 20.0% |
KENYA | Rabuor | 0.43°S, 34.91°E | March-13 | T. domingensis | 6 | 33.3% |
KENYA | Sori | 0.97°S, 34.28°E | March-13 | T. domingensis | 13 | 7.7% |
TANZANIA | Arusha | 3.37°S, 36.87°E | July-04 | T. domingensis | 29 | 3.4% |
TANZANIA | Ruvu | 6.70°S, 38.71°E | March-07 | C. exaltatus | 3 | 33.3% |
Adult longevity
The median longevity was close to three days when adults were fed honey, but equal to two days or less when they were fed with 20% or 2% saccharose solution respectively (Fig.
Realized fecundity
Females were given the opportunity to parasitize a maximum of four larvae, but they actually parasitized a mean number of only 2.3 larvae (Table
adult lifetime (days) | stung larvae (nbr) | successfully parasitized larvae (nbr) | Offspring (total nbr) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (N=40) | 2.83 | 2.3 | 1.63 | 102.93 |
Standard error | 1.17 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 6.2 |
Development of C. typhae in Kenyan and European hosts. Bold characters indicate significant differences between host strains.
S. nonagrioides populations: | Kenya | France | Italy | Statistical analyses |
---|---|---|---|---|
N: Nbr parasitized host larvae | 58 | 58 | 47 | – |
Host larval weight at time of parasitism (mg) | 295 ± 11 | 272 ± 12 | 283 ± 12 | KW2df = 1.28 P = 0.331 |
% successful parasitism % host pupae % host larva mortality | 69.0 (b) 12.1 19.0 | 67.2 (b) 13.8 19.0 | 89.4 (a) 2.1 8.5 | χ22df = 7.95 P = 0.019 |
N: Nbr of cocoon clusters analyzed below | 38 | 32 | 33 | – |
Cotesia larval development | 14.2 ± 0.4 b | 14.4 ± 0.2 b | 12.9 ± 7.1 a | KW2df = 18.29 P = 10-4 |
Cotesia pupal development (days) | 8.2 ± 0.3 b | 6.8 ± 0.2 a | 7.1 ± 0.1 a | KW2df = 19.60 P < 10-4 |
Cocoon number | 60.3 ± 4.6 b | 75.0 ± 5.5 a | 64.6 ± 4.5 ab | KW2df = 7.67 P = 0.022 |
Individual cocoon weight (mg) | 1.3 ± 0.04 | 1,3 ± 0.05 | 1,2 ± 0.02 | KW2df = 4.20 P = 0.122 |
% Cotesia pupal mortality | 10.4 ± 2.7 a | 25.8 ± 4.6 b | 3.0 ± 0.7 a | KW2df = 16.54 P < 10-3 |
% females in the cluster | 43.9 ± 5.4 c | 35.0 ± 8.2 b | 72 ± 3.8 a | KW2df = 17.98 P < 10-3 |
Estimated Reproductive Rate (expected viable adults/mother) | 37 | 37 | 56 | – |
In the next experiment, the possibility for C. typhae to develop in European populations was estimated by the incidence of the first oviposition, which ensured more than half of the wasp’s reproductive success.
Parasitoid success in European host populations
Susceptibility of European S. nonagrioides strains to the parasitoid was equal or even higher than that of the Kenyan strain, with for instance almost 90% of successfully parasitized Italian larvae. Several other traits differed between the host strains, with a trend for better performances in the Italian strain, which ranked “a” for the five progeny traits showing significant differences: faster larval and pupal development, resulting in a development time of 20 days; high offspring number per cluster, showing the lowest pupal mortality and highest ratio of females. Highest immature developmental time (22 days) was observed in the Kenyan host strain, and highest pupal mortality and lowest female ratio was observed in the French strain. From these traits, it is possible to estimate a reproductive rate, i.e. the expected number of viable adults per mother, by multiplying the proportion of successful parasitism (probability of host larvae successfully parasitized) by the mean number of produced cocoons and by the proportion of viable adults (1-proportion of pupal mortality). This approach indicated that a female C. typhae would produce 56 viable offspring from a host larva of the Italian population, and only 37 from the host larvae of the French or Kenyan populations. As discussed hereafter, most differences could be explained by the effect of rearing conditions on host larvae quality.
The morphological analysis conducted in this study, as well as the divergence of the CO1 sequences, confirmed the species status of the C. sesamiae lineage specialized on the noctuid S. nonagrioides. The CO1 divergence fell within the range of values observed between species of the flavipes complex. Morphological traits differentiated in this lineage included those used to distinguish species of the flavipes complex. This constitutes evidence for the existence of a fifth species in the flavipes complex. We named this new species C. typhae, based on the main host plant where it is found on its host. Whereas the first four species are allopatric in their endemic range, C. typhae is sympatric with C. sesamiae and may have differentiated from this species through divergent selection for adaptation on S. nonagrioides in Typhaceae and Cyperaceae, a permanent resource, and divergent selection for reproductive isolation (possibly facilitated by Wolbachia) (
It is likely that more species may be found in this complex. For instance, a relatively large CO1 divergence was also observed between C. sesamiae populations from Kitale (inland Kenya) and Mombassa (coastal Kenya), which are two host races with limited gene flow due to Wolbachia infection (
Male genitalia were one of the differentiated morphological traits. This explains mating abnormalities observed by
The larger size of C. typhae relatively to the other species of the flavipes complex could result from an adaptation to host size, S. nonagrioides being a rather large noctuid relative to other Poales stem borer hosts for the flavipes complex. The size of a solitary parasitoid has been often reported as a plastic trait varying with host size; in gregarious parasitoids, the clutch size can be plastic and varies with host size (
The morphological identification of species of the flavipes complex relies on a combination of slight differences, and their observation requires specific expertise, so a molecular diagnoses using CO1 or the virulence gene CrV1 (
The geographic distribution and ecology of C. typhae have been reported by
Presence of C. typhae in different years in the same place showed that locality and plant-host combination was a good criterion for finding this new species. Very rare occurrence of parasitism of S. nonagrioides by C. sesamiae and C. flavipes, observed in less than 1% of the larvae, means that species identity has to be checked systematically.
The longevity of C. typhae and reproduction dynamics resemble those observed for the other species of the flavipes complex, which are typical short lived pro-ovogenic parasitoid wasps (
The parasitism success of C. typhae in European host populations, assessed in the present work, was initially questioned because European S. nonagrioides are genetically well differentiated from African populations (
In the areas where C. typhae have been found, in eastern sub-Saharan Africa, S. nonagrioides is rarely seen on maize, sorghum or sugarcane, whereas this is the case in more western parts of Africa and in Europe and the Near and Middle East. However C. typhae would probably parasitize S. nonagrioides at least on maize, if introduced for biological control, because in laboratory conditions host larvae are readily accepted when fed on maize stem and fecal pellets and eaten stem tissues are highly attractive, triggering intense behavioral examination of the host with antennal tapping.
In conclusion, this study adds a fifth species to the Cotesia flavipes complex. Despite the number of individual studies that illustrate the diversity of ecological adaptations in this complex, a comprehensive analysis of the flavipes species group is still needed. It will require the joint study of all populations across the geographical and ecological range of the Cotesia flavipes complex. The use of an integrative taxonomic approach (combining morphological, molecular, biological and geographical data) will be of paramount importance in recognizing and characterizing this economically important complex of parasitoid wasps. The new C. typhae species is an interesting potential biological control agent of the Mediterranean corn borer S. nonagrioides, because of its strict host-specificity to that species, at least in its native area, precluding potential negative impact on non-target host species populations.
We are very grateful to Antoine Branca, Kate Muirhead and Florence Mougel for fruitful discussions on the project; and to the undergraduate students who contributed to the experiments, namely Louise Trouillaud and Sarah Achibet; to Gianandrea Salerno who sent us the Italian S. nonagrioides larvae; to Boaz Musyoka for field collection; to Odile Giraudier, Gerphas Ogola and Sylvie Nortier for insect rearing at Gif and the icipe; to Lionel Saunois, Amandine Dubois and Virginie Héraudet for maize production, to Alice Arnauld de Sartre for editing references; Malcom Eden for linguistic correction. The work of JFT in Canada was supported by project 1558 ‘Arthropods systematics’. This project was also supported by the ANR Bioadapt (ABC Papogen project), and by the other authors’ operating grants from IRD, CNRS, and icipe. It was performed under the juridical frame of a Material Transfer Agreement signed between IRD, icipe and CNRS (CNRS 072057/IRD 302227/00) and the authorization to import Cotesia in France delivered by the DRIAAF of Ile de France.
Species | Genbank accession nbr | Sample name |
---|---|---|
Cotesia chilonis | KJ882549 | P6679 |
KJ882550 | P6680 | |
KJ882551 | P6681 | |
Cotesia flavipes | KJ882544 | P0433 |
KJ882545 | P0434 | |
KJ882546 | P0435 | |
KJ882547 | P2541 | |
KJ882548 | P4706 | |
Cotesia sesamiae Kitale | KJ882497 | G4540 |
KJ882501 | G4594 | |
KJ882512 | G4636 | |
KJ882527 | G4701 | |
KJ882528 | G4703 | |
KJ882529 | G4708 | |
KJ882530 | G4907 | |
KJ882532 | G4915 | |
KJ882537 | G5778 | |
KJ882543 | CsK | |
Cotesia sesamiae Mombasa | KJ882495 | G4511 |
KJ882496 | G4512 | |
KJ882500 | G4572 | |
KJ882513 | G4652 | |
KJ882533 | G5699 | |
KJ882538 | G7338 | |
KJ882541 | Mhk | |
Cotesia typhae | KJ882502 | G4608 |
KJ882503 | G4609 | |
KJ882507 | G4614 | |
KJ882508 | G4615 | |
KJ882510 | G4618 | |
KJ882511 | G4619 | |
KJ882514 | G4655 | |
KJ882515 | G4656 | |
Cotesia typhae | KJ882516 | G4664 |
KJ882518 | G4666 | |
KJ882519 | G4667 | |
KJ882521 | G4675 | |
KJ882522 | G4676 | |
KJ882523 | G4677 | |
KJ882531 | G4909 | |
KJ882534 | G5726 | |
KJ882535 | G5773 | |
KJ882539 | Mbita | |
KJ882540 | MbL | |
KJ882542 | Mkd |