Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of the genus Serangium Blackburn (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) from China, with description of the immature stages
expand article infoChu-Yang Huang, Li-Ling Zeng, Wu-wei Fan§, Ping Lin§, Qi-Jin Dong§, Yu-Long Su§, Xing-Min Wang
‡ South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
§ Yuxi Branch of Yunnan Provincial Tobacco Company, Yuxi, China
Open Access

Abstract

A new species Serangium xinpingensis Huang & Wang, sp. nov. is described from Yunnan Province, China, as a newly discovered predator on Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, Aleyrodidae). The new species is a valuable addition to the 14 species of this genus in China known before. A diagnosis, detailed description, including the structure of its immature stages, illustrations, and the distribution of the new species are provided.

Key words

Coccinelloidea, larva, Microweiseinae, pupa, taxonomy

Introduction

Coccinellidae Latreille, 1807 is the largest family within the superfamily Coccinelloidea, comprises 6896 species recorded worldwide (Wang and Chen 2022). This family has been divided into three subfamilies: Microweiseinae, Monocoryninae and Coccinellinae (Che et al. 2021).

The genus Serangium was originally established by Blackburn (1889), with the description of the type species Serangium mysticum Blackburn, 1889 from Australia. Chapin (1940) suggested that Serangium and similar genera formed a closely related group. Blackwelder (1945) erected for them a separate tribe Serangiini in his checklist, and this was validated by Pope (1962). Currently, the tribe Serangiini is assigned to the subfamily Microweiseinae by Ślipiński (2007). The subfamily Microweiseinae includes four tribes: Carinodulini, Madeirodulini, Serangiini and Microweiseini (Szawaryn et al. 2020).

Serangium is the largest genus of the tribe Serangiini, comprising 48 extant species, and mostly occurring in the Oriental and Australian regions (Miyatake 1994; Raimundo and van Harten 2000; Ślipiński and Burckhardt 2006; Wang et al. 2011, 2014). Prior to this study, 14 species of Serangium had been known to occur in China (Wang et al. 2011, 2014). In this paper, we described a new species, Serangium xinpingensis sp. nov., from southwestern China. Descriptions of the adult, as well as the fourth instar larva and pupa, are provided.

Materials and methods

The adult samples examined were collected from Yunnan Province, China. The larval specimens used for this work were obtained by rearing from eggs laid by females of S. xinpingensis. We observed this ladybird preying on Bemisia tabaci Gennadius infesting Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray (Fig. 1). The adults were collected, as well as the plants, and they were raised under laboratory conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 70% ± 10% R.H. and 14:10 h L:D). All examined specimens are deposited in the Department of Entomology of South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China (SCAU).

Figure 1. 

Habitat and ecological photographs of Serangium xinpingensis sp. nov. a habitat b host plant of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius, 1889) c egg d second instar larva e fourth instar larva f adult.

The adult morphological terminology used in this paper follows Ślipiński and Tomaszewska (2010), and the larval terminology follows Kamiya (1965) and Gordon and Vandenberg (1991). External structures were observed with a dissecting stereoscope (Zeiss SteREO Discovery V20). The following measurements were made with a micrometer:

TL total length, from apical margin of clypeus to apex of elytra;

TW total width, across both elytra at widest part;

TH total height, through the highest point of elytra to metaventrite;

HW head width, including eyes;

PL pronotal length, from the middle of the anterior margin to the base of the pronotum;

PW pronotal width at widest part;

EL elytral length, along the suture, from the apex to the base including the scutellum;

EW = TW.

The examined specimens were stored in 75% ethanol. The specific structures of larvae including mouthparts, head, and tibiotarsus, as well as abdomen of adult, were detached and cleaned with 10% NaOH at 56 C for 1 h. Subsequently, these structures were dissected and rinsed with distilled water. Following processing, the genitalia of both males and females were transferred to neutral balsam, and the specific structures of larvae were transferred to glycerol. Photographs of these structures were taken with an Axiocam 506 color digital camera attached to a Zeiss Image M2 microscope using ZEN 2.3 software. The habitus photographs of larvae and adults were taken with a Canon EOS 5DSR digital camera and processed by using Helicon Focus 7. All photos were processed by using Adobe Photoshop 2023 and Adobe Illustrator 2020.

Taxonomy

Serangium Blackburn, 1889

Serangium Blackburn, 1889: 187, 209. Type species, monotypy: Serangium mysticum Blackburn, 1889.

Serangium: Sicard 1909: 150, 151; Chapin 1940: 268; Miyatake 1961: 50; Sasaji 1971: 52; Pang and Mao 1979: 27; Miyatake 1994: 238; Ślipiński and Burckhardt 2006: 39; Ślipiński 2007: 53; Wang et al. 2011: 33.

Semichnoodes Weise, 1892: 15. Type species, monotypy: Semichnoodes kunowi Weise, 1892. Synonymized by Weise 1908: 13.

Catana Chapin, 1940: 266. Type species, original designation, Catana clauseni Chapin, 1940. Synonymized by Ślipiński and Burckhardt 2006: 39

Diagnosis

Body minute, length ranging 1.0–2.5 mm, hemispherical, with head resting closely against prosternal anterior margin at rest; dorsum glossy, bearing sparse, long, thin setae. Mandible small, triangular, with single apical tooth and reduced mola (Fig. 2g); maxillary palps geniculate, palpomeres 2 and 3 closely fitting along stipes, and terminal maxillary palpomere conical or barrel-shaped, always longer than wide (Fig. 2e). Antenna composed of nine antennomeres, antennomere 1 club-shaped and antennomere 3 moderately to strongly elongate (Fig. 2h).

Figure 2. 

Serangium xinpingensis sp. nov. ac habitus photos: a dorsal view b lateral view c front view d prothorax, ventral view e maxilla, ventral view f labium, ventral view g mandible, dorsal view h antenna, dorsal view i posterior leg, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (a–d, i); 0.1 mm (e, h); 0.05 mm (f, g).

Pronotum short, strongly transverse (Fig. 2d). Scutellum large, triangular. Prosternum strongly protruding medially, forming a broad lobe partly covering mouthparts; prosternal process subtruncate apically, broad. Femora, particularly profemora, broad and flat, closely fitting into depressions on ventral surface and shielding tibiae and tarsi. Elytra smooth, strongly convex, without visible punctures; epipleura extending completely to apex with well-defined cavities accommodating tips of meso- and metafemora (Fig. 2a–c).

Abdomen with ventrites 1 and 5 notably longer than ventrites 2–4 together (Fig. 3a). Postcoxal line on abdominal ventrite 1 complete, extending to metanepisternum, without associated pits or pores (Fig. 3a).

Figure 3. 

Genitalia of adults of Serangium xinpingensis sp. nov. a abdomen, ventral view bd male genitalia: b penis, lateral view c tegmen, ventral view d tegmen, lateral view ef female ovipositor: e spermatheca f coxites, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Serangium xinpingensis Huang & Wang, sp. nov.

Diagnosis

This species can be identified by its brown body, dark-brown pronotum with sparse setae and two subparallel longitudinal rows of punctures along the lateral elytral margin, and body integument covered with long, thin setae (Fig. 2a); the penis is strongly arched (Fig. 3b).

This species is very similar to Serangium clauseni (Chapin, 1940) and Serangium parcesetosum Sicard, 1929, but it differs from S. clauseni in its more arched penis, squarer bases of parameres, and abdominal ventrite 1 with more densely incised punctures (Wang et al. 2011). It is distinguished from S. parcesetosum by its more sharply angular antennomere 2 and curvature of its penis (Booth and Polaszek 1996).

Description of adult

TL: 2.04–2.35 mm, TW: 1.78–2.06 mm, TH: 1.28–1.34 mm, TL/TW: 1.14–1.15; PL/PW: 2.31–3.35; EL/EW: 1.84–1.87.

Body hemispherical; dorsum strongly convex (TH: 1.28–1.34 mm), glabrous (Figs 2a–c). Head brown or reddish-brown. Pronotum brown or reddish-brown, with black margins. Scutellum light brown. Elytra brown, slightly paler than head and pronotum, with one dark-brown band-like marking present along lateral margin; surface with sparse, shallow punctures, demonstrating one row along suture and two subparallel longitudinal rows along lateral margin (Fig. 2a, b).

Head transverse and ventrally flattened, 0.41× elytral width (HW/EW = 2.45). Frons with long sparse setae. Eyes large and coarsely faceted, greatest interocular distance 0.36× of head width. Antenna with nine antennomeres, terminal antennomere large, and spatulately elongate (Fig. 2h).

Pronotum short and strongly transverse, 0.69× of elytral width (PW/EW = 1.96), sparsely covered with long setae. Prosternum with dense setae along anterior margin; prosternal process apically rounded.

Male genitalia. Penis strongly curved, arched, gradually narrowing, with blunt tip (Fig. 3b); penis capsule with one small inner process and concave on outer margin (Fig. 3b). Penis guide relatively slender and elongated, wide at base in ventral view, narrowing near distal 1/3 and having tongue-like shape; thin in lateral view, gradually tapering (Fig. 3d). Parameres asymmetrical; one extending from base to approximately 1/3 of penis guide, tapering apically, bearing few long setae; another extending from base to approximately 2/3 of penis guide, wider at base and gradually narrowing apically, with blunt tip, covered with small protuberances and setae (Fig. 3d).

Female genitalia. Genital plate (coxites) subtriangular (Fig. 3f), rounded at apex, bearing sparse setae; styli rather long (Fig. 3f), with few setae. Spermatheca consisting of two parts, including one globular, with faint constriction and two small pinch-like projections, and another elongate tubular shaped, slightly tapering distally (Fig. 3e).

Description of fourth instar larva

Length 2.98 mm; width 1.34 mm. Body fusiform, bright yellow overall, dorsal surface with two longitudinal rows of pigmented spots laterally, long setae concentrated on body sides and with sparse, short setae on dorsum.

Head subovoid. Mouthparts light brown; frontal arms U-shaped, distinct. Three bulging stemmata presented on each side at antennal insertions, arranged in triangle (Fig. 5e). Antenna with two antennomeres, antennomere 2 twice as long as antennomere 1, with one long apical sensorium (ca 26.2 μm) and inconspicuous papillae (Fig. 5e). Mandibles heavily sclerotized, subtriangular, without basal tooth, but with one long seta at condyle (Fig. 5g). Maxillae subtriangular (Fig. 5i). Maxillary palp 3-segmented, palpomere 3 nearly subequal in length with palpomere 2, elongate, with sensilla at apex (Fig. 5j), mala transverse and with anterior margin rounded (Fig. 5i). Labrum nearly trapezoidal, with sparse setae on anterior margin. Labium with sparse tomentum and four long setae evenly spaced around apex (Fig. 5f). Labial palps moderately separated, 2-segmented, palpomere 2 distinctly longer than palpomere 1 (Fig. 5j).

Thorax with parallel anterior and posterior margins of each segment, strongly convex on lateral margins; laterally with pigmented spots, bearing long setae. Prothorax narrower than meso- and metathorax, meso- and metathorax almost equal in length and width. Tibiotarsus light brown, elongate, and translucent, with sparse setae; tarsal claws sickle-shaped; basal teeth subtriangular, with one long seta at base (Fig. 5h).

Abdomen 9-segmented, each segment with lateral margin strongly convex, pigmented spots, bearing setae (Fig. 5a, b).

Description of pupa. Length 2.73 mm; width 2.11 mm. Body oval, light yellow, bearing flexible setae.

Type materials

Holotype : 1♂, China, Yunnan: Musha Township, Yuxi, 23.8507°N, 101.7782°E, ca 475 m elev., 22.v.2023, Huang CY leg (SCAU). Paratypes (15): 9♂♂6♀♀, same data as holotype (SCAU).

Distribution

China (Yunnan).

Etymology

The species epithet “xinpingensis” refers to the Xinping County where the type series was collected.

Remarks

This is the first time that individual variation in appearance was found in Serangium. Based on our examination of 16 specimens, the male genitalia are highly uniform. The species displays distinct intraspecific variations in the coloration of adults. The head and pronotum coloration frequently subuniform, while the elytra along suture and outer margins may vary from brown to blackish-brown among individuals (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. 

Habitus of adults of Serangium xinpingensis sp. nov., lateral view, showing intraspecific variations of the band-like marking along the outer margin of elytron. Scale bar: 0.2 mm.

Figures 5. 

The fourth instar larva and pupa of Serangium xinpingensis sp. nov. a fourth instar larva, dorsal view b fourth instar larva, lateral view c pupa, dorsal view dj larval structures: d head capsule, dorsal view e antenna, dorsal view f labrum. dorsal view g mandible, dorsal view h tibiotarsus and claw. dorsal view i maxillary mala, ventral view j mouthparts, ventral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (a–c); 0.05 mm (d–f, h–j); 0.025 mm (g).

Larvae of the subfamily Microweiseinae have been given little attention, and only two species have been recorded so far, namely Scymnomorphus japonicus (Kamiya, 1960) and Serangium japonicus Chapin, 1940, belonging to the tribes Microweiseini and Serangiini, respectively. The larva of Scymnomorphus japonicus was described by Kamiya (1965) and Sasaji (1968), although it was originally described under the name Sukunahikona japonicus Kamiya, 1960. The known larvae of the two tribes Serangiini and Microweiseini are very similar, but they differ greatly in the antennomere 2, which is much shorter in the tribe Microweiseini than Serangiini (Kamiya 1965). Within the tribe Serangiini, the larva of the new species can be distinguished from S. japonicus by its distinct U-shaped frontal arms. In S. japonicus, the frontal arms are invisible (Jiaming Zhuang pers. obs.)

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Mr Feng Peng, Mr Quan Zhang, and Mr Zhendong Huang for neatening the specimens, and Ms Jiaming Zhuang for dissecting the larva.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

The research was supported by the Key Science and Technology Projects of YNTC (2023530000241004), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202206010113), and the laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture Project (NZ2021023).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: CYH, XMW. Investigation: QJD, PL, YLS, WF, CYH, LLZ. Writing - original draft: CYH, LLZ. Writing - review and editing: XMW.

Author ORCIDs

Chu-Yang Huang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5943-7088

Li-Ling Zeng https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9858-0638

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Blackburn T (1889) Further notes on Australian Coleoptera, with descriptions of new species. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 11: 175–214.
  • Blackwelder RE (1945) Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies, and South America, pt. 3. Smithsonian Institution United States National Museum Bulletin: 343–550. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.185.3
  • Booth RG, Polaszek A (1996) The identities of ladybird beetle predators used for whitefly control, with note on some whitefly parasitoids, in Europe. In: Brighton Crop Protection Conference: Pests & Diseases–1996 (Ed.) Volume 1: Proceedings of an International Conference, Brighton, UK, 18–21 November 1996. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, 69–74.
  • Chapin E (1940) New genera and species of lady-beetles related to Serangium Blackburn (Coleoptera: Coocinellidae). Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 30: 263–272.
  • Che L, Zhang P, Deng S, Escalona HE, Wang X, Li Y, Pang H, Vandenberg N, Ślipiński A, Tomaszewska W, Liang D (2021) New insights into the phylogeny and evolution of lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) by extensive sampling of genes and species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 156: 107045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.107045
  • Gordon RD, Vandenberg NJ (1991) Field guide to recently introduced species of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in North America, with a revised key to north American genera of coccinellini. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 93: 845–867.
  • Kamiya H (1965) Comparative morphology of larvae of the Japanese Coccinellidae, with special reference to the tribal phylongeny of family (Coleoptera). The Memoirs of the Faculty of Liberal Arts. Fukui University.
  • Miyatake M (1961) The East-Asian coccinellid-beetles preserved in the Californian Academy of Sciences, tribe Serangiini. Memoirs of the Ehime University, Section 6. Agriculture 6: 135–146.
  • Miyatake M (1994) Revisional studies of Asian genera of the subfamily Sticholotidinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Memoirs of the College of Agriculture. Ehime University 38: 223–223.
  • Pang XF, Mao JL (1979) Coleoptera: Coccinellidae II. Economic Entomology China, 14. Science Press, Beijing, China, 170 pp.
  • Raimundo AAC, van Harten A (2000) An annotated checklist of the Coccinellidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) of Yemen. Fauna of Arabia 18: 211–243.
  • Sasaji H (1968) Descriptions of the coccinellid larvae of Japan and the Ryukyus (Coleoptera). The memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Fukui University Series II. Nature and Science 18: 93–135.
  • Sasaji H (1971) Fauna Japonica. Coccinellidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Academic Press Japan, Tokyo, 345 pp.
  • Sicard A (1909) Revision des Coccinellides de la faune Malgache. II. Coccinellidae Aphidiphagae. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 78: 63–165.
  • Ślipiński A (2007) Australian ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): their biology and classification. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra, 286 pp.
  • Ślipiński A, Burckhardt D (2006) Revision of the Australian Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Part 5. Tribe Serangiini. Annales Zoologici 56: 37–58.
  • Ślipiński A, Tomaszewska W (2010) Coccinellidae Latreille, 1802. In: Leschen RAB, Beutel RG, Lawrence JF (Eds) Morphology and Systematics (Elateroidea, Bostrichiformia, Cucujiformia Partim). De Gruyter, Berlin, 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911213.454
  • Szawaryn K, Větrovec J, Tomaszewska W (2020) A new tribe of the ladybird beetle subfamily Microweiseinae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) discovered on an island in the North Atlantic Ocean. Insects 11(6): 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11060367
  • Wang X, Chen X (2022) Illustrated Handbook of Ladybird Beetles in China. The Straits Publishing & Distributing Group, Fuzhou, 516 pp.
  • Weise J (1908) Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens Ergebnisse der Hamburger südwest-australischen Forschungsreise, 1905. Herausgegeben von Prof. Dr. W. Michaelsen und Dr. R. Hartmeyer. Chrysomelidae und Coccinellidae. Band II. Lieferung 1. Nature 79: 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/079396d0
login to comment