A new southern Atlantic cryptic marine shrimp species of Acetes (Decapoda, Sergestidae)

Gabriel L. Bochini; Rogério C. Costa; Fernando L. Mantelatto

doi:10.3897/zookeys.1211.128059

Research Article

A new southern Atlantic cryptic marine shrimp species of Acetes (Decapoda, Sergestidae)

Gabriel L. Bochini^‡, Rogério C. Costa^§, Fernando L. Mantelatto^‡

‡ University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

§ São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil

Corresponding author: Fernando L. Mantelatto ( flmantel@usp.br )

Academic editor: Célio Magalhães

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Bochini GL, Costa RC, Mantelatto FL (2024) A new southern Atlantic cryptic marine shrimp species of Acetes (Decapoda, Sergestidae). ZooKeys 1211: 193-209. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1211.128059

ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B6C0EF3-96DA-4766-9341-C376AA94289A

Abstract

A recently published molecular phylogenetic analysis, focusing on selected Western Atlantic subspecies of Acetes americanus Ortmann, 1893 and allies, was inconclusive about relationships among these members. This previous study found three groups that split into two distinct lineages: Acetes americanus (Brazil 1) (= A. americanus sensu stricto) and Acetes americanus (Brazil 2) + A. americanus (USA). Combined morphometry and molecular analyses applied to members of the group Acetes americanus (Brazil 2) revealed a new unidentified species genetically related to the A. americanus representatives. However, at that time, no conclusive morphological characters were found to identify it. In the present study, following an in-depth morphological analysis of specimens from the three groups, including data on the type series and consideration of the subtle distinctions of members of each lineage, morphological features of the reproductive structures (petasma and genital sternite) were found to characterize the new species, which is formally described and named herein.

Key words

Acetes americanus, Brazil, Cananéia, Dendrobranchiata, hidden diversity, new species, taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Acetes H. Milne Edwards, 1830 is represented by 13 species worldwide (De Grave and Fransen 2011; DecaNet 2024). Only three species are distributed in the Western Atlantic: Acetes americanus Ortmann, 1893, Acetes marinus Omori, 1975 and Acetes paraguayensis Hansen, 1919 (Costa and Simões 2016; Simões et al. 2023). Historically, Acetes americanus has presented taxonomic instability in four subspecies (A. americanus americanus Ortmann, 1893; A. a. carolinae Hansen, 1933; A. a. louisianensis Burkenroad, 1934a; A. a. limonensis Burkenroad, 1934a), but only two of them are considered valid (Holthuis 1948) and accepted (see Simões et al. 2023 and DecaNet 2024 for review and details below), nowadays. Acetes americanus features a wide geographic distribution in the Western Atlantic and presents two subspecies acknowledged for their geographic separation: Acetes americanus carolinae is distributed in North America and Acetes americanus americanus, in South America (DecaNet 2024). However, there are regions (Central America and Northern South America) where both subspecies are distributed in sympatry (Perez-Farfante and Kensley 1997). Despite the morphological similarity between these two subspecies, there are subtle morphological differences in their body and cornea lengths (Omori 1975). Yet, taxonomic inconsistencies were reported in both subspecies in the 1970s. Therefore, their geographically coexistent and subtle features make their validity doubtful and still unsolved. Accordingly, and due to pending future taxonomic rearrangements, the following nomenclature was adopted below: A. americanus sensu stricto - since the taxonomic status based on phylogenetic relationship, geographical distribution and morphology is clear [see lineage A. americanus (Brazil 1) in Simões et al. (2023); present study]; and Acetes a. carolinae - due to taxonomic uncertainties under this entity.

Specimens collected from the Brazilian coast were previously identified as A. americanus during a long-term biodiversity project focused on the Brazilian fauna, based on integrative analyses (see Mantelatto et al. 2018, 2022). These specimens showed some variability in morphological characters that have called our attention and presented some doubtful identifications. Recently, our team conducted a molecular study (Simões et al. 2023) to compare A. americanus specimens collected in South America to A. a. carolinae specimens sampled in North America. It was done using two mitochondrial markers to test the genetic validity of both subspecies and the likely existence of other entities distributed along the Western Atlantic that were not mentioned in previous investigations. This study found three strongly-supported groups divided into two different genetic lineages composed of A. americanus sensu stricto (Brazil 1) and Acetes americanus (Brazil 2) + A. americanus (USA) (see Simões et al. 2023; figs 3–6). The aforementioned authors used additional morphometric analysis (see Simões et al. 2023; fig. 7) to corroborate the lineages and the new unrecognized species, ‘Acetes americanus (Brazil 2)’, which was genetically related to A. americanus representatives.

In the present study, we formally describe Acetes americanus (Brazil 2) based on morphology. Besides the significant support from previously developed DNA-based phylogenetic analyses, the new species was also compared to Acetes a. americanus and A. a. carolinae.

Materials and methods

Specimens were collected under field permit approval by Instituto Chico Mendes de Biodiversidade/ICMBio, Protocol No. 23008-1, Permanent Licenses to RCC number 23012-4 and FLM 11777-2, and SISGEN CEA7CD5 and A5845DA. Most of them were deposited at the Crustacean Collection of the Department of Biology (CCDB), Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (FFCLRP/USP). Additional loaned specimens and the designated type series are deposited in the following scientific collections: Zoology Museum of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (MZUSP); Crustacean Collection of the Laboratory of Biology of Marine and Freshwater Shrimp, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil (CCLC); Crustacean Collection of Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (DZ/UFRGS); Crustacean Collection of Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (MNRJ); Oceanographic Museum of Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil (MOUFPE); National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USA (USNM); University of Louisiana Zoological Collection, Lafayette, USA (ULLZ); and Natural History Museum of Denmark - University of Copenhagen, Denmark (NHMD).

The morphological description was based on characters and character states proposed by Omori (1975), D’Incao and Martins (2000) and Vereshchaka et al. (2016a, 2016b), which used the form of the genital area (thelycum) in females and the petasma shape in males as diagnostic characters. The phylogenetic positioning and topologies proposed by Simões et al. (2023) were followed to assess individuals’ morphology and identification.

Carapace length was measured from the rostrum tip to the carapace’s posterior margin and expressed in millimeters (mm). All measurements were taken with a calibrated ocular micrometer (+/− 0.1 mm) or digital caliper. Sex was assessed based on petasma (first pleopod) presence in males and on thelycum presence in females (Xiao and Greenwood 1993). Morphometric measurements and illustrations were carried out with the aid of a stereo microscope (Leica^® M205 C) coupled with a camera (Leica^® DFC 295), added with software Leica Application Suite version 3.8.0 for taking measurements. The resulting drawings were processed in Adobe Illustrator 2020^®.

Molecular analyzes

The phylogenetic hypothesis was created using the same sequences produced and deposited in GenBank by Simões et al. (2023) (Suppl. material 1). Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyzes were performed using the IQ-TREE program (Miller et al. 2010) with the mitochondrial 16S Ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) genes concatenated. Branch support was assessed by ultrafast bootstrap with 1000 replications. Acetes paraguayensis Hansen, 1919 was included as an outgroup following the most recent global phylogeny (Vereshchaka 2017) and Simões et al. (2023). Intra- and interspecific genetic distances were estimated using MEGA 5.0 software (Tamura et al. 2011).

Abbreviations

cl carapace length,

coll(s). collector(s),

ind. individuals,

PL. pleopods,

coord. coordinate.

Results

Taxonomy

Superfamily Sergestoidea Dana, 1852

Family Sergestidae Dana, 1852

Genus Acetes H. Milne Edwards, 1830

Acetes maratayama Bochini, Costa & Mantelatto, sp. nov.

https://zoobank.org/BC6949CD-ABFE-48CA-8311-ED86CC7E5B6D

Figs 1, 2, 3, 4

Type material

Holotype : Brazil: • ♂ (cl 2.94 mm); CCDB 7957; São Paulo, Cananéia, Mar Pequeno; (24°59'55"S, 47°53'49"W); 5–10 m deep; colls. Costa, R.C. et al.; 17 April 2011. Paratypes: • 4 ♂s and 4 ♀s (cl 2.70 – 3.93 mm); CCDB 7958 (photo available, one dissected specimen); same data as holotype • 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ (cl 2.9 and 4.04 mm, respectively); MOUFPE 22042; same data as holotype • 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ (cl 3.04 and 3.93 mm, respectively); MZUSP 45904; same data as holotype • 2 ♂s and 2 ♀s (cl 4.01 – 5.19 mm); CCDB 7959; Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Macaé; (22°22'13.65"S, 41°39'9.42"W); colls. Davanso, T.M. et al.; 01 September 2013 • 2 ♂s and 2 ♀s (cl 3.25 – 5.34 mm); MNRJ 31168; Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Macaé; (22°22'13.65"S, 41°39'9.42"W); colls. Davanso, T.M. et al.; 01 September 2013 • 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ (cl 4.20 and 5.53 mm, respectively); DZ/UFRGS 7089; Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Macaé; (22°22'13.65"S, 41°39'9.42"W);colls. Davanso, T.M. et al.; 01 September 2013.

Additional material

• > 30 ind. (not measured); CCDB 3251; same data as holotype • > 50 ind. (not measured); CCDB 7624; Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Macaé; (22°22'13.65"S, 41°39'9.42"W); colls. Davanso, T.M. et al.; 01 September 2013.

Comparative material

Acetes a. americanus: • 7 ind.; CCDB 6320; Brazil, Rio Grande do Norte, Baía Formosa; (06°21'11.6"S, 35°00'1.9"W); colls. Lopes, M., Carvalho-Batista, A.; 25 April 2014 • 2 ♀s (cl 3.6 and 5.1 mm); MZUSP 21210; Brazil, Alagoas, Maceió; 27/06/1989 • > 15 ind.; CCLC 258; Brazil, Espírito Santo, Anchieta, col. Braga, A.C.A.; 01 January 2014 • 10 ind.; CCDB 7626; Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Macaé; (22°22'13.65"S, 41°39'9.42"W); colls. Davanso, T.M. et al.; 01 September 2013 • >10 ind.; CCLC 253; Brazil, São Paulo, Ubatuba, col. Costa, R.C.; 02 October 2014 • 10 ind.; CCDB 4939; Brazil, São Paulo, São Vicente, col. Castilho, A.L.; 03 September 2012 • 2 ♀s (cl 5.10 and 4.80 mm); CCLC 257; Brazil, Santa Catarina, Penha, coll. Davanso, T.M.; 24 June 2014.

Acetes a. carolinae: • 2 ♂s and 3 ♀s; ULLZ 3274; United States, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana; coll. Forman, W.W.; 31 October 1972.

Diagnosis

Rostrum acuminate, acute; median ridge with strong posterior tooth. Carapace smooth on surface, except for post-orbital and hepatic spine. Hepatic spine present in males, external part petasma not exceeding base of capitellum; inferior antennular flagellum with 10 articles. Concavity of anterior margin of genital sternite in females forming very deep arch.

Description

Male. The rostrum (Fig. 1A, B) is acuminate, acute; the median ridge has a strong posterior tooth. There is a small supraorbital spine on each side above the eyes, near the face. The hepatic spine is present (Fig. 1A). Quite large eyes do not exceed the posterior margin of the first antennular article (Fig. 1A, C). Antennule with long peduncle; very elongated third article, which is approximately three times longer than the inner margin of the second article, similar to the size of the first article (Fig. 1D); the first article in females is twice the length of the third article and approximately 4.5× longer than the second article; the inner distal lateral margin of the first article presents simple setae in the anterior half (Fig. 1G); males with inferior antennular flagellum have 10 articles; there is no clasping organ; males’ thickened proximal 3-article portion occupies less than half of the flagellum; third article has 6 obtuse spinules similar to fingers, and 1 procurved and robust projection (Fig. 1E, F); article 8 has a projection similar to a lobe in the inner lateral part of the article’s distal region (Fig. 1E). Antennal scale extending to the middle of the second antennular peduncle article with small spine on the anterior external portion (Fig. 1A, H).

Figure 1.

Acetes maratayama sp. nov. A–F, H–I male paratype, Brazil, São Paulo, Cananéia (CCDB 7958) G female, paratype, Brazil, São Paulo, Cananéia (CCDB 7958) A lateral view B carapace, dorsal view C right antennular peduncle and ocular peduncle, lateral view D right antennular peduncle, dorsal view E lower antennular flagellum, lateral view F proximal part of lower antennular flagellum, lateral view G right antennular peduncle, dorsal view H scaphocerite, dorsal view I first pleopods and petasma, lateral view.

Mandible with biarticulated palp; first article of the palp 3× longer than the second article (Fig. 2A); first maxilla without palp (Fig. 2B); second maxilla with one single undivided lobe (Fig. 2C); first maxilliped without palp (Fig. 2D); second maxilliped with 5 articles (Fig. 2E); third maxilliped exceeding half of the antennal scale, without reaching the distal margin of the antennal scale (Fig. 2F).

Figure 2.

Acetes maratayama sp. nov., male paratype, Brazil, São Paulo, Cananéia (CCDB 7958) A right and left mandible, lateral view B first maxilla, dorsal view C second maxilla, dorsal view D first maxilliped, dorsal view E second maxilliped, lateral view F third maxilliped, lateral view.

The first 3 pairs of pereiopods are elongated and have a small chela (Fig. 3A–C). Fourth and fifth pereiopods were completely absent, except for a pair of protuberances (genital thighs) in males. The sixth segment of the pleon is longer than the others (Fig. 1A). Slender pleopods, the hind ones, are a little stockier. First pair with one single branch, with sexual appendages in males (Fig. 3D) - the remainder has two appendages (Fig. 3E–H). Pleopods with a row of spines on the basal articles of the endopods and exopods. PL2 with 5 spines on the outer margin of the endopod basal joint and 5 spines on the inner margin of the exopod basal joint (Fig. 3E); PL3 with 12 spines on the outer margin of the endopod and with 5 ones on the outer margin of the exopod (Fig. 3F); PL4 with 7 spines on the external margin of the endopod (Fig. 3G) and PL5 with 8 spines on the external margin of the endopod (Fig. 3H). Telson shorter than the anterior segment, long triangularly truncated at the tip (Fig. 3I). Uropods significantly longer than the telson, external branch much longer than the internal one, with a thin tooth on the external edge closer to the tip (Fig. 3I). The uropod exopod is 4.5 times longer than it is wide; a small spine on the outer margin in the 1/3^rd portion separates the ciliated portion from the non-ciliated portion (Fig. 3I). Telson apex is truncated; lateral margins are often curved inwards and form two short teeth between which the slightly convex posterior margin is found; there are 4 bristles between the terminal teeth, the two median ones are larger than the outer teeth, and two equal-sized bristles are external to the terminal teeth (Fig. 3J).

Figure 3.

Acetes maratayama sp. nov., male paratype, Brazil, São Paulo, Cananéia (CCDB 7958) A first pereiopod, lateral view B second pereiopod, lateral view C third pereiopod, lateral view D first pleopod with petasma, lateral view E second pleopod, lateral view F third pleopod, lateral view G fourth pleopod, lateral view H fifth pleopod, lateral view I uropod and telson, dorsal view J apex of telson, dorsal view.

Males. Acetes maratayama sp. nov. is very similar to the other two described Atlantic species (A. a. americanus and A. a. carolinae), except for its different petasma and female genital sternite. Petasma pars externa in A. maratayama sp. nov. does not reach the base of the capitulum (Fig. 4B); the pars externa extends above the base of the capitulum in A. a. carolinae (Fig. 4C). On the other hand, it extends far beyond the capitulum base and reaches the middle portion of it in A. americanus (Fig. 4A). Pars externa insertion in A. maratayama sp. nov. is located in the middle section of the pars media (Fig. 4B, black arrow), similar to A. a. carolinae (Fig. 4C, black arrow). However, pars externa insertion in A. americanus is located close to the capitulum base (Fig. 4A, black arrow).

Figure 4.

Acetes americanus A, D, male and female, Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Macaé (CCDB 7626); A. maratayama sp. nov. B, E, male and female holotype, Brazil, São Paulo, Cananéia (CCDB 7957); A. carolinae C, F, male and female, United States, Gulf of Mexico, Louisiana (ULLZ 3274) A petasma lateral view, and D genital sternite ventral view B petasma lateral view, and E genital sternite, ventral view C petasma lateral view, and F genital sternite, ventral view. Cap, capitulum; PE, pars externa; PM, pars media. In males, black arrows indicate the insertion of the pars externa into the pars media of the petasma. In females, black arrows indicate the inner margin of the thigh of the third pair of pereiopods, and red arrows indicate the curvature of the genital sternite.

Female. The concave anterior margin of the genital sternite forms a very deep arch (Fig. 4E, red arrow) in comparison to A. americanus (Fig. 4D, red arrow), which has a shallow-arched concavity. The free sublateral projections by the margin’s sides are enclosed and taper to a defined point, besides being slightly curved. Acetes a. carolinae shape is similar to that of A. maratayama sp. nov.; however, the concavity of the genital sternite is not as deep, and the arch region is straight (Fig. 4F, red arrow). The thigh of the third pair of pereopods of A. maratayama sp. nov. accounts for most of the inner margin convex and presents a small indentation (Fig. 4E, black arrow). No tooth was found in its distal end. However, a large, oblong, acute process projects downwards the lower side of each thigh, close to the inner margin, and far forward and somewhat outward. Acetes a. americanus did not have an indentation (Fig. 4D, black arrow) and A. a. carolinae had a small projection (Fig. 4F, black arrow).

Habitat

The species was collected by trawling in shallow waters in depths between 5 and 30 m. The bottom sediment type at the locality comprises medium and fine sand and has a salinity close to 26–28 ppt. It is considered the mesohaline area of the estuary (see Garcia et al. 2018 for environmental characterization of the Cananéia region’s bottom area).

Coloration in life

Translucent like other species.

Type locality

Brazil, São Paulo, Cananéia (24°59'55"S, 47°53'49"W).

Distribution

Brazil, São Paulo, Cananéia (24°59'55"S, 47°53'49"W) and Rio de Janeiro, Macaé (22°22'13.65"S, 41°39'9.42"W).

Etymology

The new species is named after the type locality, Cananéia, southern São Paulo state, Brazil. Maratayama is the old name of Cananéia recorded in the navigation log of the expedition from Portugal that arrived in the region in 1531. From the Tupi-Guarani language, Maratayama means a place where the land meets the sea or land of the sea (Mara = sea and Tayama = land).

Genetic sequences

The previous genetic characterization and generated sequences obtained by Simões et al. [2023 – as “Acetes americanus (Brazil 2)” - https://peerj.com/articles/14751/#supplemental-information] are updated and should be referred to as Acetes maratayama sp. nov. The data, i.e., gene marker, geographic region, voucher catalogue collection and sequence accession number (GenBank), are: 16S Ribosomal RNA (16S) — Macaé/RJ: CCLC 0261 (OP035684 to OP035686), CCLC 0267 (OP035697); Cananéia/SP: CCLC 0262 (OP035687), CCDB 3251 (OP035688, OP035698 to OP035700); cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) — Macaé/RJ: CCLC 0255 (OP060472), CCLC 0261 (OP060504 to OP060507), CCLC 0267 (OP060521 to OP060523); Cananéia/SP: CCLC 0262 (OP060508), CCDB 3251 (OP060509, OP060524 to OP060528). Some of these sequences were herein used to prepare the phylogenetic tree (Suppl. material 1).

Genetic distance

16SrRNA gene: Intraspecific distances ranged from 0% (A. americanus, A. maratayama sp. nov. and A. carolinae) to 0.21% (A. paraguayensis) (Table 1). Interspecific distances between congeneric species ranged from 1.49 to 8.53% (Table 1). Regarding A. maratayama sp. nov., the smallest genetic distance observed was 0.85% with A. carolinae, 1.49% with A. americanus and the highest was 8.53% with A. paraguayensis (Table 1).

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Genetic distance values for the 16S rRNA gene between Acetes species distributed in the southwest Atlantic. The comparison is made between the same individuals used to build the phylogenetic trees, and the results show the minimum and maximum genetic differences recorded intra and interspecific.

	Species	1	2	3	4
1	A. americanus	0%
2	A. carolinae	1.92%	0%
3	A. maratayama	1.49%	0.85%	0%
4	A. paraguayensis	8.32–8.53%	7.89–8.10%	8.32%–8.53%	0.21%

COI gene: Intraspecific distances ranged from 0 to 0.19% (A. americanus and A. carolinae), from 0 to 0.38 (A. maratayama sp. nov.), and from 0.57% (A. paraguayensis) (Table 2). Interspecific distances between congeneric species ranged from 4.78 to 19.89% (Table 2). Regarding A. maratayama sp. nov., the smallest genetic distance observed was with A. americanus (6.12–6.50%), followed by A. carolinae (7.65–8.63%), and the largest was with A. paraguayensis (19.50–19.89%) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Genetic distance values for the COI gene between Acetes species distributed in the southwest Atlantic. The comparison is made between the same individuals used to build the phylogenetic trees, and the results show the minimum and maximum genetic differences recorded intra and interspecific.

	Species	1	2	3	4
1	A. americanus	0–0.19%
2	A. carolinae	4.78–5.16%	0–0.19%
3	A. maratayama	6.12–6.50%	7.65–8.63%	0–0.38%
4	A. paraguayensis	19.31–19.89%	19.31–19.89%	19.50–19.89%	0.57%

Phylogenetic analyses

The phylogenetic tree based on concatenated data (16S rRNA and COI) generated a similar topology found by Simões et al. (2023), with high support values. Two distinct clades were observed, one formed by A. americanus and A. carolinae and the sister clade formed by A. maratayama sp. nov. (Fig. 5)

Figure 5.

Pylogenetic reconstruction of Acetes based on concatenated markers 16S rRNA and COI. Phylogenetic tree of Bayesian inference for the Acetes species data with Bayesian posterior probabilities indicated (only posterior probabilities > 50% are shown).

Remarks

Acetes maratayama sp. nov. is closely related to A. americanus and A. a. carolinae, and it presents small morphological differences, mainly in reproductive structures. Furthermore, A. maratayama sp. nov. has 10 articles in the antennular flagellum, whereas A. a. carolinae has 9 articles, A. binghami Burkenroad, 1934a has 7 articles and A. intermedius Omori, 1975 has 13–14 articles. Acetes maratayama sp. nov. is easily distinguishable from A. binghami, since the rostrum in this species does not have denticles behind the terminal tip, whereas the rostrum in A. paraguayensis has a strong tooth. There is a rudimentary denticle or hair minus one angular bend between this tooth and the end of the rostrum. The first article of the palp is 3 times longer than the second article. It is 5 times longer in A. binghami. The first article of the palp in A. intermedius is 2 times longer than the second article.

Historically, Burkenroad (1934b) recognized four A. americanus subspecies: A. americanus carolinae (type locality: Beaufort Inlet, North Carolina, USA), A. a. louisianensis (type locality: Louisiana coast, from the Mississippi River West to Timbalier Island, Gulf of Mexico, USA), A. a. limonensis (type locality: Sweetwater River mouth, Limon Bay, Panama) and A. a. americanus (type locality: mouth of Tocantins River). However, A. a. louisianensis was synonymized with A. a. carolinae and A. a. limonensis was synonymized with A. a. americanus (DecaNet 2024). Holthuis (1948) states that subspecies A. a. louisianensis presents intermediate characteristics of other subspecies in this genus. They are not considered valid clinal variants. Burkenroad (1934b – Penaeidae from Louisiana, p. 132) states that:

“Although I do not consider the differences here pointed out sufficiently certain or significant to require taxonomic recognition, if direct comparisons prove this to be desirable, I would suggest for Material from Louisiana with the subspecific name Acetes carolinae louisianensis.”.

This author also added important notes to Hansen’s (1919) description of A. carolinae (pp. 130–132).

Thus, several records show the geographic disjunction between the Gulf of Mexico and Panama and the well-documented vicariance processes in this region, which point out speciation between these regions and Western United States Atlantic (Coates and Obando 1996; Allmon 2001; Harrison 2004; Mantelatto et al. 2023). We are still not fully convinced that A. a. louisianensis is synonymous with A. a. carolinae. Therefore, more robust morphological analyses associated with molecular analyses must be carried out to help better understand these entities.

Individuals from the Western Atlantic (North Carolina - NC) were not included in the molecular analyses carried out by Simões et al. (2023), since they focused on species distributed within Brazil. It means that doubts about A. a. carolinae remain unresolved. Unfortunately, we did not have the opportunity to morphologically analyze the specimens (Fig. 6) identified as the cotype of A. a. carolinae, from USNM (74550). There is only one sequence (histone 3 gene) of A. a. carolinae from the North Carolina locality deposited in GenBank (KX216649) compared to our newly generated sequences of nuclear gene, histone 3 (H3), for individuals from Louisiana and Mississippi regions (ULLZ 14545 – Genbank PP816024, PP816025, PP816026). However, this gene’s DNA fragment (very conserved region) is not informative enough to identify congeneric species. Simões et al. (2023) recovered the lineage identified as “A. americanus (USA)”, which is formed by individuals from Louisiana and Mississippi, USA. Thus, doubts are raised about the likely validity/resurrection of subspecies A. a. louisianensis, which is strongly supported by the type locality being in the Gulf of Mexico. Further molecular analyses using other genes are necessary to elucidate the taxonomic status of Acetes species located in the Gulf of Mexico region and in North Carolina, named A. a. carolinae.

Figure 6.

Acetes a. carolinae – type material of the original description by Hansen (1919) deposited at National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, United States (USNM), Washington D.C., USA (USNM 74550). Photo credit: Kareen Reed and Sabrina Simões.

It is also important to recall that Hansen (1919) described Acetes brasiliensis (p. 45–46, figs 1–7) collected from the Amazon River estuary. He mentioned the similarity to A. americanus, as described by Ortmann (1893), for collections from the mouth of Tocantins River, Brazil (Foz do rio Pará), which is very close to Amazon River. Despite a general description and undetailed figures, he emphasized that A. brasiliensis presented two features (length of third joint of the antennule and exopod of the uropod) making it impossible to refer A. brasiliensis to the species established by Ortmann. Burkenroad (1934b, p. 130), stated that:

“The characters by which Hansen has distinguished A. brasiliensis from A. americanus seem of very uncertain importance. The differences in length of the ciliated part of the external margin of the exopod of the uropod, as those in other characters not mentioned by Hansen, are perhaps attributable to the obvious inaccuracy of Ortmann’s figure. That Ortmann failed to notice the elongation of the third segment of the antennular peduncle of the male of his species is no more astonishing than that Kishinouye failed to do so for A. japonicus, as Kemp has shown to be the fact.”.

We had access (by photos) to the material (one male and one female – Fig. 7) used by Hansen to describe A. brasiliensis, due to the great help from Dr Jørgen Olesen (curator). They are deposited at the Natural History Museum of Denmark - University of Copenhagen (NHMD 83728). We agree with Burkenroad’s assertion and suggestion that A. brasiliensis is more likely synonymous with A. americanus after carefully analyzing the main characters.

Figure 7.

Acetes brasiliensis - Type material of the original description by Hansen (1919) deposited at Natural History Museum of Denmark - University of Copenhagen (NHMD 83728). The number ZMUC-CRU-5884 on the label is the old museum catalogue number. Photos credit: Jørgen Olesen.

Conclusions

Acetes species from the Western Atlantic are morphologically similar to each other. When we integrated more robust morphological analyses, looking in greater detail at the petasma and genital sternite, into the previous multigene molecular analysis of Simões et al. (2023), we found significant differences and described a new species, Acetes maratayama sp. nov. There is still taxonomic uncertainty regarding the specimens under the names A. a. carolinae and probably also regarding the synonymized A. a. louisianensis. At present, and pending future research, the name Acetes maratayama sp. nov. should be adopted for Macaé City, Rio de Janeiro State, and for Cananéia City, São Paulo State, Brazil. Acetes americanus should be adopted for Brazil (Northeastern Region: Rio Grande do Norte, Alagoas, Sergipe; Southeastern region: Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo; Southern region: Santa Catarina). Acetes a. carolinae is still unresolved and it most likely refers to specimens from the Western Atlantic, from North and South Carolina, given the doubts about specimens from the Gulf of Mexico and nearby areas.

Key for American species of Acetes

1	Rostrum without dorsal teeth	Acetes binghami Burkenroad, 1934a
–	Rostrum with one to two dorsal teeth	2
2	Rostrum with two dorsal teeth	Acetes marinus Omori, 1975
–	Rostrum with a single dorsal tooth	3
3	In males, the insertion of the pars externa is located near the base of the capitulum; the pars externa extends far beyond the base of the capitulum and reaches its middle portion. In females, the genital sternite has concavity’s anterior margin forming a very shallow arch	Acetes americanus Ortmann, 1893
–	In males, the insertion of the pars externa is located in the middle section of the pars media. In females, the genital sternite has concavity’s anterior margin forming a very deep arch	4
4	In males, petasma pars externa does not reach the base of the capitulum. In females, the genital sternite with the free sublateral projections by the margin’s sides are enclosed and taper to a defined point, besides being slightly curved	Acetes maratayama sp. nov.
–	In males, petasma pars externa extends above the base of the capitulum. In females, the concavity of the genital sternite is not so deep and the arch region is straight	Acetes carolinae Hansen, 1933

Acknowledgements

We thank the LABCAM and LBSC members for their help during valuable suggestions and discussions. The authors are thankful to the curators of the following crustacean collections for providing valuable help with samplings, loans and donations samples for this work, as well many friends and colleagues for preliminary discussions: Adriane A. Braga (UFES), Célio Magalhães (INPA), Cristiana S. Serejo and Irene Cardoso (MNRJ), Darryl L. Felder (ULLZ), Dirk Brandis (ZMK), Gustavo L. Hirose (UFS), Glaucia Pontes (MCP), Inácia M. Vieira (IEPA), Jesser F. de Souza-Filho (MOUFPE), Jørgen Olesen (NHMD), Jose L. Villalobos (CNCR), Luis F. Dumont (FURG), Lourdes Rojas (YPM), Marcos Tavares (MZUSP), Mariana Terossi (UFRGS), Rafael Lemaitre (USNM), Raymond Bauer (ULL), and Sabrina M. Simões (UNESP). We are thankful to Charles Fransen, an anonymous reviewer and Christopher Glasby for the suggestions that improved the quality of the manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

Financial support for this project was provided by research grants from São Paulo Research Foundation - FAPESP (Temáticos Biota 2010/50188-8 and INTERCRUSTA 2018/13685-5). Additional support was provided by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES - Código de Financiamento 001 (Ciências do Mar II Proc. 2005/2014 - 23038.004308/201414) and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq (PPBio 2023-07/2023 – Linha 8: Redes Costeiras Marinhas – 442421/2023-0). FLM and RCC are grateful to Research Scholarships from CNPq (PQ 302253/2019-0 and 304368/2022-9, respectively). GLB is grateful to FAPESP for ongoing post-doctoral fellowship (PD 2022/14593-2).

Author contributions

FLM conceived the main study idea, participated in its design and coordination, helped with morphology revisions, wrote the preliminary text and revised the manuscript. RCC collected most specimens, contributed to the main idea and revised the manuscript. FLM and RCC were responsible and signed for all foundation grants supporting the study, in all aspects, for all arrangements and facilities at USP and UNESP, and for obtaining the license permits for animal collections. GLB carried out the morphological analyses, prepared the results and figures, prepared the descriptions and revised the manuscript. All authors read, revised and approved the final manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Gabriel L. Bochini https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-8419

Rogério C. Costa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1342-7340

Fernando L. Mantelatto https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-187X

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

Allmon WD (2001) Nutrients, temperature, disturbance, and evolution: A model for the late Cenozoic marine record of the western Atlantic. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, and Palaeoecology 166(1–2): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00199-1

Burkenroad MD (1934a) Littoral Penaeidae chiefly from the Bingham Oceanographic Collection. Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection 4: 1–109.

Burkenroad MD (1934b) The Penaeidea of Louisiana with a discussion of their world relationships. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 68: 61–143.

Coates AG, Obando JA (1996) The Geologic Evolution of the Central American Isthmus. Evolution and Environment in Tropical America. Chicago University Press, Chicago, USA, 21–56.

Costa RC, Simões SM (2016) Avaliação dos Camarões Sergestídeos (Decapoda: Sergestidae), Chapter 29: In: Pinheiro MAA, Boos H (Org) Livro Vermelho dos Crustáceos do Brasil: Avaliação 2010–2014. Porto Alegre, RS, Sociedade Brasileira de Carcinologia - SBC, 466 p., 390–399.

D’Incao F, Martins STS (2000) Brazilian species of the genera Acetes H. Milne Edwards, 1830 and Peisos Burkenroad, 1945 (Decapoda: Sergestidae). Journal of Crustacean Biology 20(2): 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1163/1937240X-90000010

De Grave S, Fransen CHJM (2011) Carideorum catalogus: the recent species of the dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, procarididean and caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zoologische Mededelingen 85(9): 195–589.

DecaNet (Eds) (2024) DecaNet. Acetes H. Milne Edwards, 1830. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species. https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=158343 [on 2024-04-13]

Garcia JR, Lopes AEB, Silvestre AKC, Grabowski RC, Barioto JG, Costa RC, Castilho AL (2018) Environmental characterization of the Cananéia coastal area and its associated estuarine system (São Paulo state, Brazil): Considerations for three Penaeoidean shrimp species. Regional Studies in Marine Science 19: 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2018.02.010

Hansen HJ (1919) Sergestidae of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga-Expeditie, XXXVIII. Brill, Leiden, 1–65. [5 pls + 14 figs explanations] https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.10423

Harrison JS (2004) Evolution, biogeography, and the utility of mitochondrial 16s and COI genes in phylogenetic analysis of the crab genus Austinixia (Decapoda: Pinnotheridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30(3): 743–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00250-1

Holthuis LB (1948) Notes on some Crustacea Decapoda Natantia from Surinam. Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschappen 51: 1104–1113.

Mantelatto FL, Terossi M, Negri M, Buranelli RC, Robles R, Magalhães T, Tamburus AF, Rossi N, Miyazaki MJ (2018) DNA sequence database as a tool to identify decapod crustaceans on the São Paulo coastline. Mitochondrial DNA Part A: DNA Mapping, Sequencing and Analysis 29(5): 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2017.1365848

Mantelatto FL, Tamburus AF, Carvalho-Batista A, Rossi N, Buranelli RC, Pantaleão JAF, Teles JN, Zara FJ, Carvalho FL, Bochini GL, Terossi M, Robles R, Castilho AL, Costa RC (2022) Checklist of decapod crustaceans from the coast of the São Paulo state (Brazil) supported by integrative molecular and morphological data: V. Dendrobranchiata and Pleocyemata [Achelata, Astacidea, Axiidea, Caridea (Alpheoidea and Processoidea excluded), Gebiidea, Stenopodidea. Zootaxa 5121(1): 1–74. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5121.1.1

Mantelatto FL, Paixão JM, Robles R, Teles JN, Balbino FC (2023) Evidence using morphology, molecules, and biogeography clarifies the taxonomic status of mole crabs of the genus Emerita Scopoli, 1777 (Anomura, Hippidae) and reveals a new species from the western Atlantic. Zookeys 1161: 169–202. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1161.99432

Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, New Orleans. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

Omori M (1975) The systematics, biogeography, and fishery of epipelagic shrimps of the genus Acetes (Crustacea, Decapoda, Sergestidae). Bulletin of the Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo 7: 1–91.

Ortmann AE (1893) Decapoden und Schizopoden. In: Hensen V (Ed.) Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition der Humboldt-Stiftung. Kiel und Leipzig, Lipsius und Tischer. 2.G.b, 1–120. [pls. 1–10] https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.120070

Perez-Farfante I, Kensley B (1997) Penaeoid and Segestoid Shrimps and Prawns of the World. Keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Editions du Museumnational d’Histoire naturalle, Paris, 233 pp.

Simões SM, Costa RC, Carvalho FL, Carvalho-Batista A, Teodoro SSA, Mantelatto FL (2023) Genetic variation and cryptic lineage among the sergestid shrimp Acetes americanus (Decapoda). PeerJ 11: e14751. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14751

Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA 5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121

Vereshchaka AL (2017) The shrimp superfamily Sergestoidea: a global phylogeny with definition of new families and an assessment of the pathways into principal biotopes. Royal Society Open Science 4(9): 170221. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170221

Vereshchaka AL, Lunina AA, Olesen J (2016a) Phylogeny and classification of the shrimp genera Acetes, Peisos, and Sicyonella (Sergestidae: Crustacea: Decapoda). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 177(2): 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12371

Vereshchaka AL, Olesen J, Lunina AA (2016b) A phylogeny-based revision of the family Luciferidae (Crustacea: Decapoda). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 178: 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12398

Xiao Y, Greenwood JG (1993) The biology of Acetes (Crustacea, Sergestidae). Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 31: 259–444.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1

Selected species of Acetes and their respective localities, used in the construction of the phylogenetic hypothesis

Gabriel L. Bochini, Rogério C. Costa, Fernando L. Mantelatto

Data type: docx

Explanation note: Sequences used in genetic analyses. 16S rRNA and COI marker numbers are available from NCBI Genbank. All data used are available in the supplemental information by Simões et al. (2023). CCDB = Crustacean Collection of the Department of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo; CCLC = Crustacean Collection of the Laboratory of Biology of Marine and Freshwater Shrimp, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil; ULLZ = University of Louisiana Zoological Collection, Lafayette, USA.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Download file (32.94 kb)

﻿Abstract