Research Article
Print
Research Article
Description of a new species of Chrysonotomyia Ashmead from Houston, Texas, USA (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eulophidae)
expand article infoBrendan O’Loughlin‡, Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias‡, Michael W. Gates§, Scott P. Egan‡
‡ Rice University, Houston, United States of America
§ Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, United States of America

Corresponding author: Brendan O’Loughlin ( bso2@rice.edu )

Academic editor: Jonah M. Ulmer
© 2024 Brendan O’Loughlin, Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias, Michael W. Gates, Scott P. Egan.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.
Citation: O'Loughlin B, Brandão-Dias PFP, Gates MW, Egan SP (2024) Description of a new species of Chrysonotomyia Ashmead from Houston, Texas, USA (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Eulophidae). ZooKeys 1212: 241-254. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1212.127537
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1CB1D48B-D756-4539-8351-5ACCD406C9E3
Open Access

Abstract

A new species of the genus Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, Chrysonotomyia susbelli sp. nov., is described from the Rice University campus in Houston, Texas, USA. The species is a parasitoid emerging from Neuroterus nr. bussae galls in leaves of the southern live oak (Quercus virginiana). This represents the 6th species described from North America north of Mexico and the first in the world known to parasitize cynipid gall wasps. This discovery hints at an entire undiscovered niche between Chrysonotomyia parasitoids, cynipid gall wasps, and oaks in the Nearctic, which is a global biodiversity hotspot for oaks and cynipids. This new species description is complemented by mtDNA-COI-barcode data and information on the natural history of this species. We record host association, phenology, and report a leaf-scanning behavior performed by females, presumably to search for host galls. Modifications to the key of New World members of the genus (Hansson 2004) are included to integrate this new species.

Key words

Cynipidae, live oak, Neuroterus nr. Bussae, parasitoid, Quercus virginiana

Introduction

Chrysonotomyia Girault, 1904 is a genus of parasitic wasps in the family Eulophidae (Hymenoptera) with close to 173 described species (Hansson 2004; Paniagua et al. 2009; Singh et al. 2022). The family Eulophidae is composed of parasitoid wasps, who are natural enemies of a wide range of insects (Marris and Edwards 1995; Triapitsyn 2005). Accordingly, members of the genus Chrysonotomyia are reported to attack a wide range of host insects (Table 1) but tend to specialize on a specific life stage, where they are found as parasitoids of the larvae of endophytophagous insects such as gall-inducers, leaf-miners, and stem-miners (Hansson 1990, 2004). The few known hosts of New World Chrysonotoymia are predominantly gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae), with single-species records from Torymidae (Hymenoptera) galls, Momphidae (Lepidoptera) leaf-miners, Psyllidae (Hemiptera) galls, and scale insects in the family Coccidae (Hemiptera) (Hansson 2004).

Table 1.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Number of Chrysonotomyia species known to attack galls or endoparasitoids from each taxonomic family.

Order Family Number of associated Chrysonotomyia sp.
Diptera Cecidomyiidae 27
Hemiptera Coccidae 1
Diaspidae 1
Psyllidae 2
Hymenoptera Cynipidae 1
Torymidae 1
Lepidoptera Momphidae 1
Galls of Unknown Taxonomic Affinity 10

While the genus has a near-cosmopolitan distribution, its center of diversity is in the Americas, specifically in the Neotropics (Hansson 2004). Hansson (2004) produced the latest revision of North and Central American Chrysonotomyia, with additional modifications to the key made by Paniagua et al. (2009). The vast majority of species cataloged by Hansson (2004) and Paniagua et al. (2009) were newly described from field-collected specimens, with a small number previously described by other authors. Notably, these species rarely have a known ecology and host record. Currently, according to the Universal Chalcidoidea Database UCD Community (2023), only five species of Chrysonotomyia have been recorded in North America north of Mexico – C. aemilia Girault, 1917; C. auripunctata Ashmead, 1894; C. maculata Delucchi, 1962; C. phenacapsia Yoshimoto, 1972; and C. pherocera Hansson, 2004.

Here, we describe the sixth species of Chrysonotomyia known from the United States, the first of the entire genus confirmed to attack cynipid gall wasps, and the first in a confirmed association with oaks in the genus Quercus. Specifically, we discovered Chrysonotomyia parasitoids emerging from leaf galls induced by Neuroterus nr. bussae Melika & Nicholls, 2021 (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) on the southern live oak Quercus virginiana Mill. (Fagaceae). The morphological species description is complemented by genetic barcode sequences and details of their natural history and phenology. We also include suggested modifications to the key by Hansson (2004) to incorporate the new species.

Materials and methods

Field collections and gall rearing

Individuals were reared from galls at the type locality, Houston, Texas, on the Rice University campus (29.717, −95.402) and collected as adults on the host plant, Quercus virginiana. Currently, this is the only location from which the species has been confirmed. However, we believe it should be found within the range of its insect host on its host plant, found throughout the southern United States along the Gulf Coast (Cavender-Bares et al. 2015; Driscoe et al. 2019). For insect rearing from gall tissue, galls identified as Neuroterus nr. bussae on Q. virginiana were placed into holding containers in early March 2023, after which the new species shortly emerged later in May and early April. The term “Neuroterus nr. bussae” is used due to genetic data which suggests the species in Texas may be different from the one described from Florida (Egan Lab, unpublished data). Free-living adult individuals were also collected via aspirator from leaves of Q. virginiana. All individuals of the new species were preserved in 96% EtOH and frozen in a −80 °C ultrafreezer.

Morphological descriptions and type material location

The description of the species was made under a Leica 205C stereomicroscope. Specimens were imaged using a Macropod using Canon EOS R6 equipped with a Canon 113 Zoom Lens EF 70–200mm and M Plan Apo 10× and 20× compound objective lenses. Images were then stacked in Zerene Stacker (v. 1.04 Build T2023–114 06–11–1120, Zerene Systems). Final images were processed in Adobe Photoshop 2023.

The holotype, syntype, and all paratypes were deposited in the National Museum of Natural History in Washington D.C (USNM).

Complementing morphological taxonomy with molecular barcodes

Three individuals were selected for molecular barcoding: one male and one female that had emerged from galls (harvested 4/18/2022, emerged 5/6/2022 and 5/4/2022 respectively), and one female caught via aspirator directly from the host plant leaf (May 2023). Genetic material was extracted using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kits (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). We used a pair of degenerate primers to amplify a segment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase (mtDNA - COI) gene using standard PCR protocols (Smith et al. 2008). Primers used were COI pF2: 5′ – ACC WGT AAT RAT AGG DGG DTT TGG DAA – 3′ and COI 2437d: 5′ – GCT ART CAT CTA AAW AYT TTA ATW CCW G – 3′, developed by Simon et al. (1994) and modified by Kaartinen et al. (2010). Samples were sent to the University of Arizona for sequencing. We edited raw sequences and assembled forward and reverse reads using Geneious v. 6.1.8 (Kearse et al. 2012). The final sequences were 620, 622 and 631bp in length. We ran each sequence through the “identification request” module on the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD; Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007) to identify the highest percentage matches from previously identified taxa. All sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers provided below).

Abbreviations

Abbreviations follow the terminology used in Hansson (2004) and Paniagua et al. (2009).

HE/MS/WM Ratio of height of eye (HE), malar space (MS) and width of mouth opening (WM)

POL/OOL/POO Ratio of distance between posterior ocelli (POL), distance between the posterior ocellus and the compound eye (OOL) and the distance between occipital margin and posterior ocelli (POO)

WH/WT Ratio of width of head in dorsal view (WH), and the width of thorax (WT), measured across widest part

LW/>LM/HW Ratio of length of wing (LW), length of marginal vein (LM) and height of wing (HW)

PM/ST Ratio of length of postmarginal vein (PM) and the length of stigmal vein (ST)

MM/LG Ratio of length of mesosoma measured from anterior margin of pronotum to posterior margin of propodeum (MM) and the length of gaster (LG)

Results

Taxonomy

Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904

Chrysonotomyia Ashmead, 1904. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology) 25: 166.

Type species

Eulophus auripunctatus Ashmead.

Diagnosis

Subtorular sulci present; clypeus delimited laterally only (sometimes weakly so); occiput without vertical groove or weak fold between occipital margin and occipital foramen; postmarginal vein usually shorter (0.1–0.8×) than stigmal vein (but 2.3–3.2× as long in species group neeigena); midlobe of mesoscutum with one pair of setae (2–3 pairs in a few species); notauli poorly delimited or missing in posterior part; petiolar foramen rounded triangular; petiole very short, as a narrow band (as long as wide in a very few species); male phallobase: digitus with one spine (a few species with two spines (mainly the species in group planiseta), digitus is missing in species group laeviscuta) (Hansson 2004).

Species group auripunctata

Diagnosis. Midlobe of mesoscutum with one pair of setae; flagellomeres with short and asymmetric sensilla; digitus in male genitalia with one spine (Hansson 2004).

Chrysonotomyia susbelli sp. nov.

https://zoobank.org/9D4FE13C-E9C2-4A9E-B504-CB413DC9FD12
Figs 1, 2

Diagnosis

Mesosoma predominantly golden yellow with dark brown markings dorsally. Similar to C. corynata (Hansson, 2004) but differing in hue and dorsal patterning; dorsellum visible in dorsal view; antennae not distinctly clavate; flagellomere five dark brown; gaster with dark brown transverse bands, never more than two complete dorsally.

Description

Length of body ♀ 1.0–1.2 mm, ♂ 0.9 mm.

Mesosoma female: Mesoscutum golden yellow with the posterior midlobe occupied by a transverse, metallic brown band flanked by small transverse dark bands on the sidelobes, the metallic brown band may appear metallic green when viewed at certain angles. Axillae golden yellow with 2–3 areas of dark brown coloration. Scutellum golden yellow with median longitudinal dark band, anterior and posterior edges lined with dark transverse bands. Dorsellum golden yellow. Propodeum light yellow with a dark brown transverse band (Fig. 1A). Pronotum, prepectus, transepimeral sulcus, propodeal callus, lower mesepimeron and ventral mesosoma pale white, creating a distinct countershading between golden yellow dorsally and pale white ventrally. Transepimeral sulcus and lower mesepimeron often with thin, longitudinal bands of dark brown coloration (Fig. 1B). Mesosoma male: Same as female with dark bands significantly darker in color (Fig. 2A, B). Legs pale white in both sexes. Wings hyaline. Petiole dark brown.

Figure 1. 

Chrysonotomyia susbelli sp. nov. female holotype A dorsal habitus B lateral habitus C frontal view of head.

Figure 2. 

Chrysonotomyia susbelli sp. nov. male syntype A dorsal habitus B lateral habitus C frontal view of head.

Female gaster pale yellow with three incomplete dark transverse bands and apical ovipositor sheaths dark brown (Fig. 1A). Male gaster darker yellow, with two complete dark transverse bands preceded by an incomplete one (Fig. 2A).

Head light yellow apically, transitioning to pale white below. Eyes pink. Scape pale white, pedicel light yellow with apical two-thirds of inner surface dark brown, flagellomeres 1–4 yellow, flagellomere 5 brown (Figs 1C, 2C). Occiput light yellow, male sometimes with large dark macula.

Both male and female antennae with pale white verticillate setae (Figs 1C, 2C). Vertex with weak reticulation inside ocellar triangle, smooth outside triangle. Frontal suture weakly curved dorsad. Occipital margin carinate. Ratios of HE/MS/WM ♀ 2.5/1.5/1.0, ♂ 2.7/1.0/1.2; POL/OOL/POO ♀ 1.0/1.1/1.5, ♂ 4.9/2.7/1.0; WH/WT 1.1.

Mesoscutum and scutellum with weak and small meshed reticulation. Dorsellum small, convex, and smooth (Fig. 1A, 2A). Forewing with speculum closed below; without stigmal hair lines; radial cell bare. Ratios of LW/LM/HW 2.0/1.0/1.1; PM/ST 0.5.

Female gaster ovate. Ratio of MM/LG ♀ 1.0/1.1, ♂ 1.0/1.0

Biology

Known to parasitize Neuroterus nr. bussae (Fig. 3), a cynipid which forms galls on Quercus virginiana. Preliminary genetic data and biogeographic patterns in this system suggest that the form of Neuroterus bussae present in Houston may not be the same species as the ones described from Florida, but this requires additional work. Thus, we conservatively refer to the insect host as Neuroterus nr. bussae (Egan lab, unpublished data). Live females were observed under both lab and field conditions. Adults always moved in a zigzag pattern, both in captivity and the wild. In the field, females were observed moving back and forth on upper leaf surfaces (Suppl. material 1). We hypothesize that this movement represents gall-searching behavior. Currently the species is only known from the Rice University campus in Houston, Texas, USA, but it likely follows the distribution of its host, Neuroterus nr. bussae on Quercus virginiana.

Figure 3. 

Neuroterus nr. bussae galls in leaves of the southern live oak (Quercus virginiana) collected in Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

Material examined

Holotype • United States: Houston, Harris County; 29.7179°N, 95.4048°W; 4.v.2022. ex. gall on Quercus virginiana; coll. Pedro Brandão-Dias (1♀; USNMENT01928159). Syntype • same data as holotype; 10.v.2022 (1♂; USNMENT01928158). Paratypes • (1♀; USNM) same data as syntype; 25.iv.2022 • (1♀ 1♂; USNM) same data as syntype; 29.iv.2022 • (1♀; USNM) same data as syntype, 2.v.2022 • (5♀; USNM) same locality as holotype; 20.iv.2023–18.v.2023; on leaves of Quercus virginiana, coll. Brendan O’Loughlin.

Molecular barcodes

The three mtDNA-COI sequences were, on average, 99.4% identical to each other and, on average, 91.1% identical to Chrysonotomyia sp. PLACZ361-20 from Guanacaste, Costa Rica in the BOLD database. The sequences can be accessed through GenBank accession numbers PP468569, PP468570, and PP468571. See Suppl. material 2 for the exact mtDNA-COI sequences.

Phenology

Adult C. susbelli sp. nov. were observed emerging from galls in the lab from 18 April to 10 May 2022, and we made additional observations of adult C. susbelli sp. nov. on the leaves of the southern live oak (Q. virginiana) from 20 April to 18 May 2023.

Etymology

From Latin sus belli, roughly translating to “warpig”, in reference to the mascot of the Rice University dormitory Wiess College where the first author currently resides, whose official color is similar to the golden yellow of the dorsal mesosoma. Wiess College is named for Harry Carothers Wiess (1887–1948), one of the founders and one-time president of Humble Oil, whose generosity, with time, mind, and resources, greatly shaped the expansion of Rice University.

Differential diagnostics

Morphologically similar species

Chrysonotomyia susbelli sp. nov. most closely keys to C. corynata using the key by Hansson (2004). Based on Hansson’s (2004) morphological description of C. corynata and photos provided by Jim Woolley at the Texas A&M Entomological Collection, C. corynata can be distinguished from C. susbelli sp. nov. using the following features: dorsal mesosoma pale yellow rather than bright golden yellow (Fig. 4B); presence of a longitudinal rather than transverse band on the anterior mesoscutum (Fig. 4B); lower half of the body similar in color to upper half (Fig. 4A); female antennae distinctly clavate (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4. 

Chrysonotomyia corynata Hansson, 2004 A lateral habitus B dorsal habitus.

Chrysonotomyia corynata is also geographically distant and only known from specimens collected in the Mexican states of Coahuila, Guanajuato, Michoacán, Oaxaca, Puebla and Zacatecas (Hansson 2004). Its ecology is unknown.

Modification to the key by Hansson (2004)

To incorporate C. susbelli sp. nov. into the key in Hansson (2004), we suggest the following modifications:

47(46) Mesosoma completely yellowish-white; forewing with denser setation (as in fig. 284) C. crinipennis (♀)
– Mesosoma with some parts brown; forewing with less dense setation (fig. 285) 47a
47a(47) Flagellomeres similar in color to scape C. corynata
– Flagellomeres significantly darker than scape C. susbelli sp. nov.

Ecologically similar species

While all New World Chrysonotomyia with a reported host association parasitize galls (Hansson 2004), C. susbelli sp. nov. appears to be the first in the genus to attack galls induced by Cynipidae. One species formerly placed in the genus was recorded from Cynipid galls in Japan, but it was transferred to Closterocerus by Hansson (1999)—namely Closterocerus cinctiventris Ashmead, 1994 (Kamijo 1976). Additionally, the Universal Chalcidoidea database records Chrysonotomyia obesula Boucek, 1986 as parasitizing cynipids (UCD Community 2023). However, Boucek’s original description records C. obesula only from Cecidomyiidae (Boucek 1986).

Of the 103 Chrysonotoymia previously described from North America, only 33 species (~32%) have known hosts (Hansson 2004; Paniagua et al. 2009). For reference, we provide a list of insect hosts (Table 1) and plant associates (Table 2) at the family level for the North American members of the genus, adapted from Hansson (2004), Paniagua et al. (2009), and data from C. susbelli. Note that several species are known from more than one gall and plant associate.

Table 2.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Number of Chrysonotomyia species known to attack galls or endoparasites associated with each taxonomic plant family.

Plant Family Number of associated Chrysonotomyia sp.
Aquifoliaceae 1
Cannabaceae 1
Cecropiaceae 5
Celastraceae 1
Chrysobalanaceae 2
Ericaceae 1
Fabaceae 6
Fagaceae 1
Lauraceae 1
Lecythidaceae 2
Loranthaceae 1
Malvaceae 1
Melastomataceae 2
Moraceae 4
Myrtaceae 2
Olacaceae 1
Piperaceae 2
Polygonaceae 2
Rhizophoraceae 1
Rosaceae 1
Rubiaceae 2
Sapindaceae 1
Smilaceae 1
Urticaceae 2
Verbenaceae 1
Vitaceae 1

Geographically proximate species

Five other Chrysonotomyia are known from the United States: C. aemilia Girault, 1917; C. auripunctata Ashmead, 1894; C. maculata Delucchi, 1962; C. phenacapsia Yoshimoto, 1972; and C. pherocera Hansson, 2004 (Hansson 2004, UCD Community 2023). Features useful for separating these from C. susbelli sp. nov. are given for each. Our modified key, above, works to distinguish C. susbelli sp. nov. from all other Chrysonotomyia, but we provide specific differences below.

Chrysonotomyia aemilia. This species is known only from Florida (UCD Community 2023). It can be distinguished from susbelli sp. nov. by a long, lanceolate gaster and lack of dark coloration on the dorsal mesosoma (Hansson 2004). Known from unspecified Cecidomyiidae galls on Eugenia foetida Pers. (Myrtaceae) (Burks 1979).

Chrysonotomyia auripunctata. This species is known from Florida, Brazil, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Guyana, Mexico, Panama, St. Vincent, and Trinidad. It can be distinguished from susbelli sp. nov. by the scutellum hiding the dorsellum in dorsal view and the presence of two hair lines radiating from the stigmal vein (Hansson 2004). Within the United States it is only known to attack the cecidomyid Ctenodactylomyia watsoni Felt, 1915 on Coccoloba sp. (Polygonaceae) (Burks 1979).

Chrysonotomyia maculata. This species is known from Canada, Costa Rica, Honduras, and the USA (Florida, Maryland, New York, Ohio, Tennessee, and Texas). It can be distinguished from C. susbelli sp. nov. by its pale antennae, distinctly elongate female gaster, and partly to completely hairy radial cell (Hansson 1994, 2004). In the United States, it is known to attack Pachypsylla celtidismamma and Pachypsylla celtidisvesicula galls (Hemiptera, Aphalaridae) on Celtis sp. (Cannabaceae) (Burks 1979; Hansson 1994). There is a single record in Hansson (1994) of six specimens reared from a “Cynipid gall on Quercus leaf”. However, since it is a single occurrence and the insect host and host plant were not specified, this is uncertain until further evidence emerges.

Chrysonotomyia phenacapsia. It can be distinguished from susbelli sp. nov. by the midlobe of the mesoscutum with two pairs of setae, and strong reticulation on the frons above the frontal suture (Hansson 2004). In the United States (California, Florida, and Texas), known to parasitize scale insects of the family Diaspidae (Hemiptera) on Pinus jeffreyi Balf., introduced Pinus pinea L. and Picea sp. (Pinaceae) (Yoshimoto 1972; Luck and Dahlsten 1974; Burden and Hart 1994).

Chrysonotomyia pherocera. Known from Costa Rica, Mexico, and the USA (Florida and Missouri). It is easily distinguishable from C. susbelli sp. nov. by the anterolateral edges of the vertex produced forward of the eyes, creating “horns” (Hansson 2004). Its ecology is unknown.

Discussion

While C. susbelli sp. nov. has officially been recorded only from Houston, citizen-science observations on platforms such as Bugguide.net and iNaturalist hint at a possibly much broader distribution, and/or the presence of closely related undescribed species across the United States. There is one iNaturalist observation from Manitoba, Canada (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/183137943) that appears to show a superficially similar Chrysonotomyia in association with the cynipid Druon ignotum Bassett, 1881. Two other observations, one from Bugguide in Texas (https://bugguide.net/node/view/908461) and the other from iNaturalist in New York (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/173105503), show a similar Chrysonotomyia associated with galls on Vitis spp. (Vitaceae). Whether these observations represent C. susbelli sp. nov. or a closely related species are difficult to tell without specimens and genetic data.

Our work suggests that there might be more undescribed Chrysonotomyia hiding among the 90+ oak species in the US and Canada and 180+ oak species in Mexico (POWO 2024), each with a diverse community of gall-forming cynipid wasps, which can range from 5–50 species per host (Cornell 1985). If just one Chrysonotomyia was associated with one leaf galling cynipid species, there could easily be other Chrysonotomyia still to be discovered across Mexico, the US, and Canada.

Interestingly, we also describe here a novel leaf-scanning behavior performed by females on the leaves of live oaks (Suppl material 1). In this behavior, females very quickly moved along the adaxial side of leaves in a zigzag pattern while tapping its antenna on the leaf surface. This behavior was observed in the field multiple times by the authors and performed always by females on the leaves of its host`s host, Q. virginiana. In the provided video, one can observe that the female stops at a leaf distortion superficially similar to its host gall and taps it repeatedly for better examination. This led us to hypothesize that this is a host-searching behavior performed by mated females looking to oviposit.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Robert Kresslein for assistance with photography and Dr Jim Woolley (emeritus, Texas A&M University) for providing images of C. corynata used herein.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

Funding is provided through the Fondren Library Open Access Author Fund.

Author contributions

Brendan O'Loughlin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization; Pedro Brandão-Dias: Methodology, Data Curation, Writing – Review and Editing; Michael Gates: Investigation, Supervision; Scott Egan: Supervision, Project Administration.

Author ORCIDs

Brendan O'Loughlin https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9925-8492

Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-0617

Michael W. Gates https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-1371

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Boucek Z (1986) Taxonomic study of chalcidoid wasps (Hymenoptera) associated with gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on mango trees. Bulletin of Entomological Research 76: 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300014899
  • Burden D, Hart ER (1994) Parasitoids Associated with Chionaspis pinifoliae and Chionaspis heterophyllae (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in North America. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 66: 383–391.
  • Burks BD (1979) Torymidae (Agaoninae) and all other families of Chalcidoidea (excluding Encyrtidae). Page Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico.
  • Cavender-Bares J (2015) Phylogeny and biogeography of the American live oaks (Quercus subsection Virentes): a genomic and population genetics approach. Molecular Ecology 24: 3668–3687. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13269
  • UCD Community (2023) Universal Chalcidoidea Database Website. https://ucd.chalcid.org [Accessed on March 3, 2024]
  • Driscoe A, Nice C, Busbee R, Hood G, Egan SP, Ott J (2019) Host plant associations and geography interact to shape diversification in a specialist insect herbivore. Molecular Ecology 28: 4197–4211. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15220
  • Hansson C (1990) A taxonomic study on the Palearctic species of Chrysonotomyia Ashmead and Neochrysocharis Kurdjumov (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Insect Systematics & Evolution 21: 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631290X00021
  • Hansson C (1994) Re-evaluation of the genus Closterocerus Westwood (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), with a revision of the Nearctic species. Insect Systematics & Evolution 25: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631294X00018
  • Hansson C (2004) Eulophidae of Costa Rica, 2. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 537 pp.
  • Kamijo K (1976) Notes on Ashmead’s and Crawford’s types of Eulophidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) from Japan. Kontyû 44: 482–495.
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond AJ (2012) Geneious Basic: An Integrated and Extendable Desktop Software Platform for the Organization and Analysis of Sequence Data. BioInformatics 28: 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  • Luck RF, Dahlsten DL (1974) Bionomics of the pine needle scale, Chionaspis pinifoliae and its natural enemies at South Lake Tahoe, California. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 67: 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/67.3.309
  • Marris GC, Edwards JP (1995) The biology of the ectoparasitoid wasp Eulophus pennicornis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on host larvae of the tomato moth, Lacanobia oleracea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 85(4): 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300032995
  • Paniagua M, Hansson C, Medianero E (2009) Entedoninae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) associated with gall-inducing insects (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in Panama. Zootaxa 2237: 43–58. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2237.1.3
  • Simon CF, Frati F, Beckenbach AT, Crespi BJ, Liu H, Flook PK (1994) Evolution, Weighting, and Phylogenetic Utility of Mitochondrial Gene Sequences and a Compilation of Conserved Polymerase Chain Reaction Primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 651–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/87.6.651
  • Singh S, Kumar A, Kaneria M (2022) Description of five new eulophid species (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) associated with leaf vein galls of Madhuca longifolia (J. Koenig) (Sapotaceae) in India. Zootaxa 5129: 1–36. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5129.1.1
  • Smith MA, Rodriguez JJ, Whitfield JB, Deans AR, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2008) Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 105: 12359–12364. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805319105
  • Triapitsyn SV (2005) Revision of Ceranisus and the related thrips-attacking entedonine genera (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) of the world. African Invertebrates 46(1): 261–315.
  • Yoshimoto CM (1972) A new species of Achrysocharis (Eulophidae: Chalcidoidea) from pine needle scale (Diaspididae: Homoptera). The Canadian Entomologist 104: 1483–1485. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1041483-9

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Leaf scanning behavior of Chrysonotomyia susbelli sp. nov.

Brendan O’Loughlin, Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias, Michael W. Gates, Scott P. Egan

Data type: mp4

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (3.24 MB)
Supplementary material 2 

Raw COI sequences of Chrysonotomyia susbelli sp. nov.

Brendan O’Loughlin, Pedro F. P. Brandão-Dias, Michael W. Gates, Scott P. Egan

Data type: fasta

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (1.98 kb)
login to comment