Research Article |
Corresponding author: Luiz A. Rocha ( lrocha@calacademy.org ) Academic editor: Tihomir Stefanov
© 2024 Luiz A. Rocha, Hudson T. Pinheiro, Ahmed Najeeb, Claudia R. Rocha, Bart Shepherd.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Rocha LA, Pinheiro HT, Najeeb A, Rocha CR, Shepherd B (2024) Chromis abadhah (Teleostei, Pomacentridae), a new species of damselfish from mesophotic coral ecosystems of the Maldives. ZooKeys 1219: 165-174. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1219.126777
|
A new species of Chromis (Teleostei, Pomacentridae) is described from four specimens collected between 95 and 110 m depth in mesophotic coral ecosystems in the Maldives, Indian Ocean. Chromis abadhah sp. nov. can be distinguished from all of its congeners by the following combination of characters: dorsal-fin rays XIII, 12–13; anal-fin rays II,11–12; pectoral-fin rays 17–18; tubed lateral-line scales 17; gill rakers 7+17–18 = 24–25; pearly white body with a large black marking covering the anterior two-thirds of the anal fin. The closest DNA barcode sequence (5.1% average uncorrected genetic distance on the mitochondrial COI gene), among those available, is Chromis woodsi, a similar mesophotic species known from the coastal western Indian Ocean (Somalia to South Africa). The new species is easily distinguished from C. woodsi by having 13 dorsal spines (versus 14 in C. woodsi), the absence of a black band on the base of the tail (present in C. woodsi), and by the genetic difference.
COI, deep reefs, ichthyology, Indian Ocean, rebreather diving, taxonomy
The family Pomacentridae (damselfishes and anemonefishes) is one of the largest and most conspicuous families of fish inhabiting tropical shallow coral reefs (
Because they are much harder to explore than their shallow-water counterparts, deep reefs are home to many undescribed species (
Exploration of the planet’s mesophotic ecosystems has been uneven. Hawaii and some locations in the Caribbean, the South Pacific and the Red Sea are relatively well-known, whereas the eastern Pacific, eastern Atlantic and Indian Ocean are largely unexplored (
Specimens were collected with hand nets and immediately transported to a field laboratory where they were photographed, tissue sampled, and fixed in 10% formalin. Measurements and x-radiographs were made at the California Academy of Sciences after fixation and preservation in 75% ethanol. Counts were made with the aid of a microscope; measurements were made with digital calipers to the nearest 0.01 mm and rounded to one decimal place, following the conventions described in
Counts and measurements for Chromis abadhah sp. nov., holotype and paratypes.
Holotype | Paratypes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
TL (mm) | 92.6 | 90.1 | 87.1 | 67.4 |
Standard length (mm) | 68.7 | 66.1 | 64.5 | 50.2 |
Counts: | ||||
Dorsal-fin rays | XIII, 12 | XIII, 13 | XIII, 12 | XIII, 12 |
Anal-fin rays | II, 11 | II, 12 | II, 11 | II, 11 |
Pectoral-fin rays | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 18 |
Pelvic-fin rays | I, 5 | I, 5 | I, 5 | I, 5 |
Principal caudal rays | 7 + 6 | 7 + 6 | 7 + 6 | 6 + 6 |
Procurrent segmented caudal rays | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Procurrent spiniform caudal rays | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Tubed lateral-line scales | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
Posterior mid-lateral pored scales | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Scales above l.l. | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Scales below l.l. | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Circumped. scales | 16 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
Gill rakers | 7 + 17 | 7 + 18 | 7 + 18 | 7 + 17 |
Supraneural bones | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Vertebrae | 26 (11+15) | 26 (11+15) | 26 (11+15) | 26 (11+15) |
Measurements: | ||||
Body depth | 56.3 | 59.0 | 55.5 | 55.0 |
Body width | 21.1 | 20.2 | 18.3 | 19.6 |
Head length | 35.6 | 35.6 | 36.0 | 36.8 |
Snout length | 9.6 | 8.9 | 9.3 | 9.8 |
Orbit diameter | 15.0 | 14.2 | 12.6 | 14.2 |
Interorbital width | 14.3 | 12.7 | 13.4 | 12.2 |
Caudal-peduncle depth | 14.3 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 15.7 |
Caudal-peduncle length | 7.7 | 7.8 | 10.3 | 8.6 |
Upper jaw length | 12.6 | 11.5 | 10.5 | 10.6 |
Pre-dorsal length | 41.9 | 42.7 | 42.1 | 42.8 |
Spinous dorsal-fin base | 49.4 | 50.9 | 49.3 | 46.2 |
Soft dorsal-fin base | 15.6 | 16.3 | 15.2 | 14.5 |
Dorsal-fin base | 65.0 | 67.2 | 62.9 | 46.0 |
1st dorsal spine | 6.7 | 8.7 | 10.3 | 8.5 |
2nd dorsal spine | 13.4 | 13.2 | 15.9 | 14.9 |
3rd dorsal spine | 15.8 | 16.8 | 18.0 | 18.4 |
4th dorsal spine | 17.5 | 17.7 | 19.4 | 21.4 |
5th dorsal spine | 17.1 | 17.7 | 18.8 | 21.0 |
6th dorsal spine | 18.3 | 17.6 | 18.6 | 20.5 |
Last dorsal spine | 12.1 | 11.8 | 11.9 | 14.4 |
Longest dorsal ray | 25.8 (4th) | 20.8 (4th) | 21.7 (4th) | 28.2 (3rd) |
Preanal length | 73.9 | 72.4 | 69.1 | 67.2 |
1st anal spine | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.2 | 7.1 |
2nd anal spine | 23.5 | 22.2 | 21.9 | 23.3 |
Longest anal ray | 22.2 (1st) | 19.4 (1st) | 19.6 (1st) | 20.2 (1st) |
Anal-fin base | 21.3 | 24.7 | 24.2 | 21.1 |
Caudal-fin length | 33.9 | 32.1 | 39.2 | 34.7 |
Caudal concavity | 15.0 | 15.4 | 20.3 | 16.4 |
Longest pectoral ray | 34.6 (1st) | 34.5 (1st) | 31.6 (1st) | 32.9 (1st) |
Prepelvic length | 41.3 | 42.4 | 40.9 | 43.0 |
Pelvic-spine length | 20.1 | 20.6 | 20.6 | 23.2 |
1st pelvic soft ray | 29.5 | 30.4 | 32.6 | 29.5 |
In December 2022, four individuals were collected with hand nets by members of our team diving on mixed-gas, closed-circuit rebreathers (Hollis Prism 2). Molecular analysis and PCR amplification of the standard barcode fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) were performed following protocols described by
Holotype
(Figs
The following combination of characters distinguishes Chromis abadhah sp. nov. from all of its congeners: dorsal-fin rays XIII, 12–13; anal-fin rays II,11–12; pectoral-fin rays 17–18; tubed lateral-line scales 17; gill rakers 7+17–18 = 24–25; body pearly white; large black marking covering anterior two-thirds of anal fin; small black spot on upper edge of pectoral-fin base; no markings on caudal peduncle.
Dorsal-fin rays XIII, 12 (XIII, 12–13); anal-fin rays II, 11 (II, 12); all soft dorsal- and anal-fin rays branched, the last to base, the last two soft rays associated with a single complex pterygiophore; fourth (third) dorsal ray longest, 25.8% (20.8–28.2) SL; pectoral-fin rays 18|18 (17|18), the uppermost and lowermost unbranched; first pectoral ray the longest, 34.6% (31.6–34.5) SL; pelvic-fin rays I,5; principal caudal-fin rays 7+6 (6–7+6), the uppermost and lowermost unbranched; upper and lower procurrent caudal-fin rays 6, the anteriormost 3 rays (dorsally and ventrally) spiniform; tubed lateral-line scales 17; scales above lateral line to origin of dorsal fin 3; scales below lateral line to origin of anal fin 9; circumpeduncular scales 16 (16–18); gill rakers 7+17 = 24 (7+17–18 = 24–25); supraneural bones 3; vertebrae 11 precaudal + 15 caudal = 26.
Body moderately deep, depth 56.3% (55.0–59.0) SL, and compressed, the width 21.1% (18.3–20.2) SL; head length 35.6% (35.6–36.8) SL; profile of head slightly convex above orbit, nape slightly convex; snout length 9.6% (8.9–9.8) SL; eye large, orbit diameter 15.0% (12.6–14.2) SL; interorbital width 14.3% (12.2–13.4) SL; caudal-peduncle depth 14.3% (15.4–15.7) SL; caudal-peduncle length 8.0% (7.8–10.3) SL.
Mouth terminal, oblique, upper jaw angle about 45° to the horizontal axis of head and body; posterior edge of maxilla extending slightly beyond vertical at anterior edge of eye, upper jaw length 12.6% (10.5–11.5) in head length; teeth multi-serial, outer row of conical teeth in each jaw, much larger anteriorly; narrow band of villiform teeth lingual to outer row, in three irregular rows anteriorly, narrowing to a single row on side of jaws; tongue triangular with rounded tip; gill rakers long and slender, longest on lower limb near angle about half the length of gill filaments; anterior nostril relatively large with a short fleshy rim, more elevated on posterior edge and located at level of horizontal line through middle of pupil, slightly less than halfway between front of snout and anterior edge of orbit; posterior nostril much smaller and slit-shaped, located above and behind anterior nostril, close to edge of orbit. Opercle ending posteriorly in flat spine, the tip relatively acute and not obscured by scales; preopercular margin smooth, posterior margin extending dorsally to almost level of upper edge of orbit; suborbital with free lower margin extending nearly to a vertical at posterior edge of orbit.
Scales finely ctenoid; tubed portion of lateral line ending beneath rear portion of spinous dorsal fin (base of 13th dorsal-fin spine); head scaled except lips; scaly sheath at base of dorsal and anal fins, progressively thicker towards body; column of scales on each membrane of dorsal fin, narrowing distally, those on spinous portion of dorsal fin progressively longer, reaching about two-thirds the distance to spine tips on posterior membranes; two or three columns of scales on anal-fin membranes, progressively smaller distally; small scales on caudal fin extending about one-third distance to posterior margin; small scales only on base of pectoral fins; median scaly process extending posteriorly from between bases of pelvic fins, its length about half that of pelvic spine; axillary scale above base of pelvic spine about half the length of pelvic spine. Origin of dorsal fin above second lateral-line scale; pre-dorsal length 41.9% (42.1–42.7) SL; spinous dorsal-fin base length 49.4% (46.2–50.9) SL; soft dorsal-fin base length 15.6% (14.5–16.3) SL; first dorsal spine 6.7% (8.5–10.3) SL; second dorsal spine 13.4% (13.2–15.9) SL; third dorsal spine 15.8% (16.8–18.4) SL; fourth dorsal spine 17.5% (17.7–21.4) SL; fifth dorsal spine 17.1% (17.7–21.0) SL; sixth dorsal spine 18.3% (17.6–20.5) SL; last dorsal spine 12.1% (11.8–14.4) SL; fourth dorsal ray longest, 25.8% (20.8–28.2) SL; first anal spine 7.5% (7.1–7.5) SL; second anal spine 23.5% (21.9–23.3) SL; longest anal-fin ray first, 22.2% (19.4–20.2); caudal fin forked, with filamentous extensions, its length 33.9% (32.1–39.2) SL, and concavity 15.0% (15.4–20.3) SL; first pectoral-fin ray longest, 34.6% (31.6–34.5) SL; pelvic spine 20.1% (20.6–23.2) SL; first pelvic soft ray 29.5% (29.5–32.6) SL.
Color. In life (Fig.
Chromis abadhah is only known from the Maldives. It has been recorded at eight locations spanning 180 km (from Faadhippolhu to Dhaalu Atoll) so we presume it should be widely distributed across the Maldivian Archipelago. The type specimens were collected on a steep slope between 101 and 118 m depth off Maafilaafushi Island, and other individuals were observed elsewhere between 80 and 120 m depth. Habitat complexity was medium to high (small crevices and caves) but of low relief, with an apparently high diversity of encrusting sponges.
The work that led to the discovery of this species was funded by the Rolex Perpetual Planet initiative through a Rolex Award for Enterprises to LAR. To honor this initiative, we name this species “abadhah” (pronounced aa-BAH-duh), which means “perpetual” in Dhivehi, the local language of the Maldives. We also hope that this species and its habitat remain perpetual. To be treated as a noun in apposition.
In addition to Chromis abadhah, three other species of Chromis have an overall pearly white body with black markings in life: Chromis axillaris (Bennett, 1831), Chromis pelloura Randall & Allen, 1982, and Chromis woodsi Bruner & Arnam, 1979. All are mesophotic, having only been recorded below 30 m depth. Chromis axillaris is the most widely distributed, being recorded in various locations between the western Indian Ocean and the western Pacific at depths of 60 to 100 m (
Recently,
We are grateful to JD Fong for pictures and x-rays of the type specimens and D Pitassy for providing the
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This work was funded by a Rolex Award for Enterprises to LAR, and by the generous support of donors who endorsed the California Academy of Sciences’ Hope for Reefs Initiative. HTP thanks FAPESP (The São Paulo Research Foundation) for funding and fellowship (2019/24215-2 and 2021/07039-6).
L Rocha, H Pinheiro, and B Shepherd discovered and collected the new species. L Rocha and A Najeeb took specimen data and obtained all collecting permits. C Rocha did the DNA sequencing. All authors contributed to manuscript writing and editing.
Luiz A. Rocha https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4011-569X
Hudson T. Pinheiro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3143-1474
Claudia R. Rocha https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8069-6535
Bart Shepherd https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8918-1551
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.