Research Article
Print
Research Article
The redescription and complete mitogenomes of two Oxycarenus species (Hemiptera, Oxycarenidae) and phylogenetic implications
expand article infoChangjun Meng, Suyan Cao, Wen Dong, Cuiqing Gao
‡ Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Open Access

Abstract

In this study, the two Oxycarenidae species, O. gossypii Horváth, 1926 and Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus Distant, 1904, are redescribed, and their complete mitogenomes are sequenced and analyzed. The phylogeny of Lygaeoidea is examined using 45 complete mitogenomes of lygaeoid species and four outgroup species. The gene orientation and arrangement of the two mitogenomes are found to be consistent with typical Lygaeoidea mitochondrial features, comprising 37 genes, including 13 PCGs, 22 tRNAs, 2 rRNAs, and a control region. Nucleotide composition of the species was biased towards A and T, with the gene order identical to the putative ancestral arrangement of insects. Start codons, stop codons, RNAs, relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU), and nucleotide diversity (Pi) of Oxycarenidae exhibited characteristics similar to other families in Lygaeoidea. Bayesian-inference (BI) and maximum-likelihood (ML) methods were employed to investigate phylogenetic relationships using PCG datasets from selected species. Phylogenetic analyses reveal slightly different topologies between BI and ML methods, with variation primarily concentrated in Colobathristidae and Rhyparochromidae. Our study confirms that the two sequenced Oxycarenidae species formed a single clade, and the position of Oxycarenidae remains stable in both ML and BI phylogenetic trees. These findings expand the mitochondrial genome databases of Lygaeoidea and provide valuable insights into the phylogenetic relationships within Lygaeoidea or Pentatomomorpha.

Key words

Heteroptera, Lygaeoidea, mitochondrial DNA, Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus, Oxycarenus gossypii, phylogenetic analysis

Introduction

Mitochondrial genome analysis is a powerful tool for elucidating the phylogeny and population genetics of insect taxa (Cameron and Whiting 2008; Li et al. 2023). Insects possess circular double-stranded mitochondrial molecules typically ranging from 14 to 20 kb in length. These genomes encode 37 genes, encompassing 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), and a single control region. While insect mitochondria generally adhere to a conventional structure, there are exceptions, in certain species of Anoplura (Boore 1999; Shao et al. 2009). Characterized by compactness, insect mitochondrial genomes feature minimal spacer regions or overlapping sequences between adjacent genes (Boore 1999). Notably, they exhibit small size, stable genetic composition, relatively conserved gene sequences, rapid evolutionary rates, and comprehensive molecular information. Consequently, they serve as invaluable tools for investigating molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and population genetic structure (Xue and Bu 2008; Simon and Hadrys 2013; Kocher et al. 2014).

The Lygaeoidea, the second largest superfamily in Pentatomomorpha, comprises over 4,700 described species across 16 families (Weirauch and Schuh 2011; Dellapé and Henry 2024). This widespread terrestrial superfamily primarily includes herbivorous species feeding on plant seeds or sap, with some being economically significant pests (Sweet 2000). Among them, Oxycarenidae species predominantly inhabit the plants of Malvaceae and Sterculiaceae, where they feed on seeds and can inflict substantial damage to cotton and other mallow crops (Sureshan et al. 2021). Currently, over 140 species in 27 genera have been documented worldwide (Henry and Dellapé 2009; Xiao and Gao 2022; Dellapé and Henry 2024).

Past studies investigating the phylogenetic relationships of Pentatomomorpha have relied on morphological characters for classification (Henry 1997), and more recently, they have incorporated molecular data. The increasing number of Lygaeoidea species documented in recent years underscores the importance of exploring their phylogenetic relationships using mitochondrial DNA, both to validate previous findings and to provide additional insights.

In this study, we redescribe both O. gossypii Horváth, 1926 and Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus Distant, 1904. Additionally, two misidentifications in China are rectified, and the complete mitogenomes of these species are sequenced. Subsequently, we construct phylogenetic trees using the complete mitogenomes of 45 species of Lygaeoidea and four outgroup species. These findings contribute essential data for further investigations into the phylogenetic relationships within Lygaeoidea and Pentatomomorpha.

Materials and methods

Sample collection, identification and DNA extraction

Adult specimens of Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus Distant, 1904 were collected from Xiangshan Park, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China, in May 2020. Adult specimens of O. gossypii Horváth, 1926 were collected from Phoenix Airport, Sanya City, Hainan Province, China, in March 2020.

Composite images were obtained using an M205FA Leica stereomicroscope and camera, with the Leica Application Suite v. 4.5.0. Type label data are presented verbatim, with lines on the same label separated by a slash (/), and different labels divided by double slashes (//). Texts printed [pr] and handwritten [hw] are indicated. All measurements provided in the text are expressed in millimetres.

Abbreviations

BMNH Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom;

IZAS Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica, Beijing, China;

MSIE Shanghai Institute of Entomology, Shanghai, China;

NKUM Institute of Entomology, Nankai University, Tianjin, China;

NJFU Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu.

Genomic DNA were extracted from adult target insects using the Rapid Animal Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).

Sequencing, assembly, annotation, and bioinformatics analyses

The mitochondrial genomes of these two species were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). Subsequently, Fastp v. 0.36 (Chen et al. 2018) was employed to eliminate low-quality and short reads, ensuring the integrity of the data for subsequent analysis. SPAdes v. 3.15 (Bankevich et al. 2012) facilitated the de novo assembly of the high-quality next-generation sequencing data, resulting in the generation of contigs and scaffolds. Rigorous evaluation and quality control measures were applied to the assembly results using PrInSeS-G (Massouras et al. 2010). Potential contamination originating from the host genome was meticulously identified and eliminated, retaining only the scaffolds derived from the organelle genome. Sequence similarity was assessed by comparing the scaffolds with the NCBI library using BLASTn (Ye et al. 2012). Target scaffolds were manually selected based on sequencing depth and coverage information for each scaffold. GapFiller v. 1.11 (Boetzer and Pirovano 2012) was utilized to supplement and rectify obtained alleles by correcting editing errors and filling gaps introduced during splicing, including the insertion or deletion of fragments as needed.

The two mitogenome sequences were annotated using Geneious v. 11.0.2 (Kearse et al. 2012), following the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code. Circular maps of the mitogenomes were generated using the CGView Server (Grant and Stothard 2008). To ensure annotation accuracy, all tRNA genes were verified using the MITOS Web Server (Bernt et al. 2013), and their secondary structures were predicted using the tRNAscan-SE Server v. 1.21 (Lowe and Chan 2016). PhyloSuite v. 1.2.3 (Xiang et al. 2023) and MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018) were employed to determine base composition and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values of the two mitogenome sequences. Non-synonymous substitutions (Ka) and synonymous substitutions (Ks) of the 13 PCGs of Oxycarenidae were calculated using DnaSP5 software (Librado and Rozas 2009), and Ka/Ks values were subsequently derived. Nucleotide composition skew was computed using the formulas developed by Perna and Kocher: AT-skew = (A − T) / (A + T) and GC-skew = (G − C) / (G + C). This study aimed to comprehensively examine the evolutionary patterns among mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs) in species of Oxycarenidae.

Phylogenetic analysis

To investigate mitogenome arrangement patterns in Lygaeoidea, we compared the gene orders of all known Lygaeoidea mitogenomes with those of closely related taxa (Table 1). For phylogenetic analyses, we examined a total of 49 mitogenomes (Table 1), which included two newly generated sequences from this study. We standardized all sequences and extracted 13 PCGs using PhyloSuite v. 1.2.2 (Perna and Kocher 1995; Xiang et al. 2023). The 13 PCGs of these species were individually aligned using codon-based multiple alignments with MAFFT v. 7.313 software (Katoh and Standley 2013). The concatenated PCGs were processed with PhyloSuite v. 1.2.3. PartitionFinder2 selected optimal partitioning schemes and evolutionary models for constructing Bayesian-inference (BI) and maximum-likelihood (ML) trees with confidence (Soria-Carrasco et al. 2007; Lanfear et al. 2017). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using IQ-TREE v. 1.6.8 (Guindon et al. 2010) and MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with the assistance of PhyloSuite v. 1.2.2.

Table 1.

Sequences used in this study.

Superfamily Family Species Length (bp) GenBank No.
Lygaeoidea Berytidae Metatropis longirostris Hsiao, 1974 15,744 NC_037373.1
Berytidae Yemmalysus parallelus Stusak, 1972 15,747 NC_012464.1
Blissidae Bochrus foveatus Distant, 1879 14,738 ON961018.1
Blissidae Capodemus sinuatus (Slater, Ashlock & Wilcox, 1969) 15,199 ON961019.1
Blissidae Cavelerius yunnanensis Gao & Zhou, 2021 15,330 NC_065816.1
Blissidae Dimorphopterus gibbus (Fabricius,1794) 14,988 NC_065817.1
Blissidae Iphicrates gressitti Slate, 1966 15,288 NC_065818.1
Blissidae Ischnodemus noctulus Distant, 1901 15,291 NC_065819.1
Blissidae Macropes dentipes Motschulsky, 1859 14,923 NC_065821.1
Blissidae Macropes harringtonae Slater, Ashlock & Wilcox, 1969 15,314 OP442511.1
Blissidae Macropes robustus Zheng & Zou, 1982 15,041 NC_065822.1
Colobathristidae Phaenacantha marcida Horváth, 1914 14,540 NC_012460.1
Geocoridae Geocoris pallidipennis (Costa, 1843) 14,592 NC_012424.1
Geocoridae Henestaris halophilus (Burmeister, 1835) 14,868 MW619656.1
Lygaeidae Arocatus melanocephalus (Fabricius,1798) 15409 NC_063142.1
Lygaeidae Crompus oculatus Stål, 1874 15,332 MW619652.1
Lygaeidae Kleidocerys resedae resedae (Panzer, 1793) 14,688 KJ584365.1
Lygaeidae Lygaeus sp. FS-2019 15,235 MF497725.1
Lygaeidae Nysius cymoides (Spinola, 1837) 16,301 MW291653.1
Lygaeidae Nysius fuscovittatus Barber, 1958 14,575 NC_050167.1
Lygaeidae Nysius graminicola (Kolenati, 1845) 16760 NC_073587.1
Lygaeidae Nysius plebeius Distant, 1883 17,367 MN599979.1
Lygaeidae Nysius sp. 16,330 MW465654.1
Lygaeidae Pylorgus porrectus Zheng, Zou & Hsiao, 1979 15,174 NC_080509.1
Lygaeidae Pylorgus sordidus Zheng, Zou & Hsiao, 1979 15,399 NC_084343.1
Lygaeidae Tropidothorax cruciger (Motschulsky, 1859) 15,781 NC_056293.1
Lygaeidae Tropidothorax sinensis (Reuter, 1888) 15,422 MW547017.1
Malcidae Chauliops fallax Scott, 1874 15,739 NC_020772.1
Malcidae Chauliops sp. 15300 OP793778.1
Malcidae Chauliops quaternaria Gao & Bu, 2009 15612 NC_087837.1
Malcidae Chauliops zhengi Xue & Bu, 2004 15507 NC_087838.1
Malcidae Malcus auriculatus Štys, 1967 15,097 NC_063141.1
Malcidae Malcus inconspicuous Štys, 1967 15,316 OL944394.1
Malcidae Malcus setosus Štys, 1967 14,894 NC_063138.1
Ninidae Cymoninus sechellensis (Bergroth, 1893) 15,962 NC_085420.1
Ninidae Ninus insignis Stål, 1860 14,632 NC_063137.1
Oxycarenidae Oxycarenus gossypii Horváth, 1926 16,144 OR_713903
Oxycarenidae Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus Distant, 1904 15,462 PP_446310
Rhyparochromidae Bryanellocoris orientalis Hidaka, 1962 15,606 NC_063139.1
Rhyparochromidae Eucosmetus incises (Walker, 1872) 14,562 NC_085565.1
Rhyparochromidae Harmostica fulvicornis (Horváth, 1914) 15,703 NC_063140.1
Rhyparochromidae Ligyrocoris sylvestris (Linnaeus, 1758) 16,621 PP145295.1
Rhyparochromidae Neolethaeus assamensis (Distant, 1901) 15,067 NC_037375.1
Rhyparochromidae Panaorus albomaculatus (Scott, 1874) 16,345 NC_031364.1
Pyrrhocoroidea Pyrrhocoridae Dysdercus evanescens Distant, 1902 15,635 MW619727.1
Coreoidea Alydidae Riptortus pedestris (Fabricius, 1775) 17,191 EU427344.1
Coreidae Hydaropsis longirostris (Hsiao, 1963) 16,521 EU427337.1
Rhopalidae Aeschyntelus notatus Hsiao, 1963 14,532 EU427333.1

Results

Taxonomy

Oxycarenus gossypii Horváth, 1926

Figs 1A, 2A–C

Oxycarenus gossypii: Horváth 1926: 136; Esaki 1926: 161; Slater 1964: 673; Péricart 2001: 115.

Oxycarenus laetus: Zheng and Zou 1981: 96. Misidentification.

Material examined

China • 3♂♂1♀; Yunnan, Yuanjiang; alt. 400 m; 25 Jul. 2006; Weibing Zhu leg. (NKUM) • 1♂2♀♀; Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Mengsong; alt. 1600 m; 23 Apr. 1958; Xvwu Meng leg. (IZAS) • 1♂; Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Damenglong; alt. 650 m; 8 Apr. 1958; Leyi Zheng leg. (IZAS) • 5♂♂6♀♀; Hainan, Sanya, Fenghuang airport; 26 Mar. 2020; Bo Cai leg. (NJFU) • 16♂♂5♀♀; Hainan, Jianfengling thermal forestry institute; 21 Apr. 1985; Leyi Zheng leg.; from capsule of Abutilon indicum (NKUM) • 192♂♂183♀♀; Hainan, Sanya; alt. 10 m; 5–6 Apr. 1960; Suofu Li leg. (IZAS) • 26♂♂26♀♀; Hainan, Ledong; 11 Jun. 1960; Xuezhong Zhang leg. (IZAS) • 1♂; Hainan Nada; 27 Apr. 1954; Keren Huang leg. (IZAS).

Figure 1. 

Dorsal and ventral view of Oxycarenus species sequenced A O. gossypii B, C O. bicolor heraldus.

Redescription

Body brown, densely punctate, with white decumbent, erect, and apically enlarged setae. Antennae dark brown. Rostrum extends past anterior margin of abdominal sternite III, up to abdominal sternite V in females. Bucculae yellowish white. Pronotum brown, often lighter at anterior margin and posterior half, densely covered with deep, large punctures, white erect, and apically enlarged setae mixed with decumbent setae; callus area slightly elevated, densely covered with large, dark brown setae. Lateral margins of pronotum slightly sinuate. Scutellum brown, evenly punctate, flattened except basal margin concave, peripherally covered with both decumbent and erect, apically enlarged setae. Clavus brown, with both types of setae mentioned above. Corium yellowish brown, with a conspicuous black spot at distal angle; sparse erect setae, apical margin straight. Membrane smoky brown. Thoracic sternum brown, posterior margins of metapleura pale. Ostiolar peritreme of metathoracic scent gland yellow. Supracoxal lobewhite. Femora dark brown; fore femora beneath with four spines; fore tibiae yellowish brown; mid and hind tibiae pale, both ends brown. Abdominal sterna reddish brown, smooth, impunctate, without erect setae. Male sternites VI and VII with posterior margin with two transverse combs of glandular setae on either side of median line. Female abdominal sterna III to IV fused; ovipositor reaching abdominal sternites V–VII, with sternites V–VII medially strongly narrowed, pushed forward towards base of abdomen.

Pygophore: dorsal opening narrowly triangular (Fig. 2A); lateral projections in basal one third of pygophore openings, projecting obliquely posteriorly, tips truncate; distal margin of cup-like sclerite with a narrow, deep incision (Fig. 2A). Parameres (Fig. 2B, C) with basal shank relatively broad, about twice as wide as blade; outer projection rounded, inner projection more pointed from dorsal view; another finger-like inner projection present on inner side from ventral view.

Figure 2. 

Genitalia of Oxycarenus species A–C O. gossypii A pygophore, posterodorsal view B, C left paramere, dorsal and ventral view D–F O. bicolor heraldus D pygophore, posterodorsal view E, F left paramere, dorsal and ventral view.

Measurements (in mm, n = 8). Body length 3.40–4.00, width 1.1–1.30. Head length 0.70–0.72, width across eyes 0.65–0.67; antennal segments I–IV length: 0.27–0.29: 0.56–0.58: 0.45–0.47: 0.52–0.54. Pronotum length 0.78–0.80, width of anterior margin 0.52–0.54, width of posterior margin 1.00–1.02; scutellum length 0.34–0.36, width 0.52–0.54. Distance of apex clavus–apex corium 0.60–0.62; distance of apex corium–apex membrane 0.72–0.74.

Distribution

China (Hainan, Yunnan, Taiwan); Vietnam.

Remarks

On review of descriptions and figures, we discovered that Oxycarenus gossypii was erroneously identified as Oxycarenus laetus (Kirby, 1891) in the study by Zheng and Zou (1981). However, distinct differences exist between these species: the clavus appears brown in O. gossypii, whereas it is pale in O. laetus; the membrane presents a smoky golden-brown hue in O. gossypii (in contrast to the colorless and hyaline membrane of O. laetus); and, while the corium of O. gossypii is pale or slightly smoky except at the base, it consistently remains pale in O. laetus.

Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus Distant, 1904

Figs 1B, C, 2D–F

Oxycarenus heraldus: Distant 1904: 44.

Oxycarenus bicolor variety heraldus: Bergroth 1918: 73.

Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus: Slater 1964: 670.

Oxycarenus lugubris: Zheng and Zou 1981: 97. Misidentification.

Type material examined

(digital photograph). Lectotype: Burma • ♀; Carin Chebà [pr] / 900–1100 m [pr] / L. Fea V XII-88 [pr] // heraldus [hw] / Dist. [hw] // Distant Coll. / 1911–383 // Type [pr, red] // SYN/ TYPE [pr, blue] // Oxycarenus / heraldus / Distant, 1904: 44 [pr] / BMNH(E) / 1340705 [pr] (BMNH).

Paralectotype : same information except: BMNH(E) / 1340706 [pr].

Other material examined

China • 2♀♀; Gansu, Wen county, Fanba; 30 Jul. 1988; collected from capsule of Abutilon theophrasti (NKUM) • 20♂♂15♀♀; Jiangsu, Nanjing, Laoshan; 20 Jun. 2021; collected from capsule of Hibiscus mutabilis (NJFU) • 6♂♂7♀♀; Sichuan, Qingchengshan; 16 Aug. 1956; Leyi Zheng leg. (NKUM) • 20♂♂25♀♀; Yunnan, Dali, Cangshan; 19 Aug. 2006; Zhonghua Fan leg. (NKUM) • 300♂♂242♀♀; Yunnan, Menglong, Banna, Mengsong, alt. 1600 m; 23 Apr. 1958; Xvwu Meng leg. (IZAS) • 40♂♂32♀♀; Yunnan, Pingbian; alt. 1300 m; 22 Jun. 1956; Keren Huang leg. (MSIE).

Redescription

Head dark, blackish brown or black, densely coarsely punctate, with white, flat, decumbent setae and sparser erect, apically enlarged, long setae. Antennae dark, blackish brown or black, with segment I extending to tip of clypeus. Head ventrally densely covered with silvery-white, flat setae. Rostrum extends to hind coxae or middle of abdominal sternite III. Bucculae dark. Pronotum brown with a black transverse stripe at callus area. Covered with coarse punctures and sparsely erect and apically enlarged long setae, with slightly sinuate lateral margins. Scutellum dark blackish brown or black, similar setae to pronutum, punctuated, with a sunken base and a slightly elevated middle. Clavus dark brown to blackish brown, possessing three lines of punctures, with middle row incomplete. Corium with exocorium, basal 1/3 of inner corium, and distal angle yellowish white, about middle 1/3 of inner corium blackish brown, not reaching exocorium; sometimes, extreme distal angles of corium slightly darkened, but not with obvious small black spots; distal margin of corium straight; clavus and corium with sparse pale erect setae. Membrane dark blackish brown, with basal margin adjoining distal margin of corium narrowly white. Head and prothorax ventrally densely covered with silvery-white, decumbent setae; thoracic sternites and pleurae black or dark blackish brown, glossy, except supracoxal lobe and posterior margin of metapleura pale; ostiolar peritreme of metathoracic scent gland strongly protruding, basally brown and distally yellow. Femora blackish brown, slightly thickened; fore femora with four spines; tibiae yellow with both ends dark blackish brown, and fore tibiae darker. Abdomen reddish brown to blackish brown. Posterior margin of sternites VI and VII in males with two conspicuous transverse combs of glandular setae on either side of median line. Female abdominal sterna III–IV fused; ovipositor reaching abdominal sternites V–VII, with sternites V–VII medially strongly narrowed and pushed forward towards abdominal sternites V.

Pygophore: dorsal opening broadly rounded; lateral projections finger-like, slightly inclined posteriorly and internally; distal margin of cup-like sclerite bifurcate (Fig. 2D). Parameres with blade falcate and curved; outer projection rounded; inner projection projecting dorsoventrally, more square (Fig. 2E, F).

Measurements (in mm, n = 8). Body length 3.80–4.30, width 1.10–1.40. Head length 0.71–0.73, width across eyes 0.72–0.73; antennal segments I–IV length: 0.28–0.30: 0.61–0.63: 0.47–0.49: 0.58–0.60. Pronotum length 0.83–0.85, width of anterior margin 0.58–0.60, width of posterior margin 1.10–1.11; scutellum length 0.41–0.43, width 0.54–0.55. Distance of apex clavus–apex corium 0.89–0.90; distance of apex corium–apex membrane 0.67–0.69.

Distribution

China (Gansu, Jiangsu, Hubei, Sichuan, Yunnan); Burma.

Remarks

The specific status of Oxycarenus heraldus Distant, 1904 was previously reduced to Oxycarenus bicolorvar. heraldus by Bergroth (1918), and later treated as subspecies Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus by Slater (1964).

Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus shares similar coloration with Oxycarenus bicolor bicolor, but there are notable differences. Unlike Oxycarenus bicolor bicolor, the brown spots on the hemelytra of Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus do not reach the exocorium (the brown spots on the hemelytra extend to the lateral margin of the corium in O. bicolor bicolor). Furthermore, the body size of O. bicolor heraldus is larger (3.80–4.30 mm) compared to O. bicolor (which is smaller, approximately 3.0–3.4 mm), and while the postero-lateral angles of the corium in O. bicolor heraldus may be slightly darkened, but they lack the distinct small black spots that are present in O. bicolor bicolor.

Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus is a common species in China, but it has long been misidentified as Oxycarenus lugubris (Motschulsky, 1859) (Zheng and Zou 1981). In comparison with O. lugubris, the pronotum of O. bicolor heraldus is brown with a black transverse stripe, whereas in O. lugubris, it is entirely black. Furthermore, only the middle 1/3 of the inner corium is blackish brown in O. bicolor heraldus, with the basal membrane narrowly white, while the distal 2/3 of the inner corium is entirely black, and the base of the membrane is also black in O. lugubris. Although both the species are distributed in China, O. lugubris has only been recorded from Taiwan and Hong Kong according to the data available on the iNaturalist website.

Genome structure and base composition

We have sequenced and annotated the complete mitogenomes of O. gossypii and O. bicolor heraldus, which were 16,144 bp and 15,462 bp in length, respectively (Table 1). These mitogenome sequences consist of the 37 typical insect mitochondrial genes, including 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), and two ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), along with an AT-rich region known as the control region (CR), forming a double-stranded ring structure (Fig. 3). The N-strand encodes 14 genes, while the J-strand encodes 23 genes, consistent with the mitochondrial gene arrangement observed in known Lygaeoidea species and the classical insect Drosophila yakuba (Burla, 1954) (Clary and Wolstenholme 1985; Hua et al. 2008; Küechler et al. 2010; Cao et al. 2020).

Figure 3. 

Circular map of the complete mitogenome of Oxycarenus species A O. gossypii B O. bicolor heraldus. Different colors indicate different types of genes and regions. Genes in the outer circle are located on the J-strand, and genes in the inner circle are located on the N-strand.

The nucleotide composition of the O. gossypii mitogenome was as follows: A = 41.35%, T = 32.82%, C = 15.33%, and G = 10.50%, while that of O. bicolor heraldus was A = 40.86%, T = 33.11%, C = 15.68%, and G = 10.35%. Both mitogenomes exhibited a high AT content, with O. gossypii at 74.17% and O. bicolor heraldus at 73.97%. Additionally, both mitogenomes displayed a slightly positive AT-skew (0.11 and 0.10) and a negative GC-skew (−0.18 and −0.20), indicating a bias towards A and T nucleotides. The study identified 15 gaps in the two mitogenome sequences, ranging from 1 bp to 22 bp, with the longest intergenic spacer being 22 bp, found between rrnL and trnV in O. gossypii (Table 2). Moreover, there were 25 overlapping gene regions, with lengths ranging from 1 bp to 24 bp, and the longest overlap of 24 bp was observed between nad5 and trnH in O. bicolor heraldus (Table 3).

Table 2.

Mitochondrial composition of Oxycarenus gossypii.

Name Direction Position From Position To Length (bp) Intergenic nucleotides Start/Stop Codons
trnI J 1 62 62 3
trnQ N 60 128 69 -1
trnM J 130 197 68 0
nad2 J 198 1187 990 2 ATA/TAA
trnW J 1186 1248 63 8
trnC N 1241 1302 62 -1
trnY N 1304 1364 62 -1
cox1 J 1366 2899 1534 0 TTG/T - -
trnL2 J 2900 2964 65 0
cox2 J 2965 3640 676 0 ATA/T - -
trnK J 3641 3711 71 0
trnD J 3712 3777 66 0
atp8 J 3778 3936 159 7 ATT/TAA
atp6 J 3930 4595 666 1 ATG/TAA
cox3 J 4595 5381 787 0 ATG/TAA
trnG J 5382 5447 66 0
nad3 J 5448 5801 354 0 ATA/TAA
trnA J 5802 5864 63 0
trnR J 5865 5927 63 0
trnN J 5928 5995 68 1
trnS1 J 5995 6063 69 1
trnE J 6063 6127 65 0
trnF N 6128 6190 63 1
nad5 N 6190 7899 1710 -3 ATA/TAA
trnH N 7903 7964 62 -2
nad4 N 7967 9286 1320 7 ATG/TAA
nad4l N 9280 9558 279 -5 ATA/TAA
trnT J 9564 9625 62 0
trnP N 9626 9684 59 4
nad6 J 9781 10236 456 1 ATA/TAA
cytb J 10236 11370 1135 0 ATG/T - -
trnS2 J 11371 11439 69 -16
nad1 N 11456 12379 924 0 ATT/TAA
trnL1 N 12380 12445 66 0
rrnL N 12464 13671 1208 -22
trnV N 13694 13690 67 -4
rrnS N 13765 14372 608 0
Table 3.

Mitochondrial composition of Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus.

Name Direction Position From Position To Length (bp) Intergenic nucleotides Start/Stop Codons
trnI J 1 62 62 3
trnQ N 60 128 69 1
trnM J 128 195 68 0
nad2 J 196 1183 988 1 ATA/TAA
trnW J 1185 1246 62 8
trnC N 1239 1300 62 0
trnY N 1301 1363 63 -1
cox1 J 1365 2898 1581 0 TTG/T - -
trnL2 J 2899 2963 65 0
cox2 J 2964 3639 699 0 ATA/T - -
trnK J 3640 3711 73 0
trnD J 3712 3774 63 0
atp8 J 3775 3933 159 7 ATA/TAA
atp6 J 3927 4592 666 1 ATG/TAA
cox3 J 4592 5378 790 0 ATG/T - -
trnG J 5379 5443 65 0
nad3 J 5444 5795 354 -1 ATT/TAG
trnA J 5797 5859 63 0
trnR J 5860 5922 65 -1
trnN J 5924 5989 66 1
trnS1 J 5989 6057 69 1
trnE J 6057 6122 65 0
trnF N 6123 6187 63 20
nad5 N 6168 7922 1714 24 ATA/TAA
trnH N 7899 7960 70 -2
nad4 N 7963 9282 1320 7 ATG/TAA
nad4l N 9276 9557 282 -2 ATT/TAA
trnT J 9560 9621 62 0
trnP N 9622 9684 63 3
nad6 J 9692 10153 462 1 ATT/TAA
cytb J 10153 11289 1137 2 ATG/TAG
trnS2 J 11288 11358 71 -17
nad1 N 11376 12298 960 0 ATA/TAA
trnL1 N 12299 12365 67 0
rrnL N 12366 13611 1253 0
trnV N 13612 13678 67 -1
rrnS N 13680 14453 802 0

Protein-coding genes

The concatenated length of the 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) of O. gossypii was 10,990 bp, encoding 3,663 amino acid residues. Similarly, the concatenated length of the 13 PCGs of O. bicolor heraldus was 11,112 bp, encoding 3,702 amino acids. Both species share the same arrangement in their mitochondrial genomes. The majority of PCGs initiate translation using the start codon ATN, except for cox1, which starts with TTG. There are three types of stop codons: TAA, TAG, and an incomplete stop codon T that is completed by the addition of 3′A residues to the mRNA.

The Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (RSCU) of the two Oxycarenidae species was computed and depicted in Fig. 4. Among the codons utilized, CGA-Arg, GCU-Ala, UCU-Ser, UUA-Leu, and GUU-Val were the most frequently employed. Particularly, UUA emerged as the most preferred codon. Moreover, a pronounced bias toward A/T nucleotides was evident across the Protein-Coding Genes (PCGs). Nucleotide diversity (Pi) and the ratios of Ka/Ks for the two species were calculated based on the 13 PCGs, as illustrated in Fig. 5. Pi values ranged from 0.12 to 0.26, with the highest values observed in atp8 and the lowest in cox3, underscoring cox3’s role as the most conserved gene in Oxycarenidae. All Ka/Ks ratios were below 1, varying from 0.04 to 0.29, indicative of purifying selection acting on the genes. Particularly noteworthy was nad6’s highest Ka/Ks values, suggesting rapid evolution, while cox1 and cytb exhibited the slowest evolution, with the lowest values.

Figure 4. 

RSCU values of Oxycarenus species A O. gossypii B O. bicolor heraldus. The ordinate represents the RSCU (the number of times a certain synonymous codon is used/the average number of times that all codons encoding the amino acid are used). The abscissa represents different amino acids. The number above the bar graph represents the ratio of amino acids (number of certain amino acids/total number of all amino acids).

Figure 5. 

Nucleotide diversity (Pi) and nonsynonymous (Ka)/synonymous (Ks) mutation rate ratios of 13 PCGs of Oxycarenidae species (the Pi and Ka/Ks values of each PCG are shown under the gene name).

RNA

The rRNA genes were positioned between the AT-rich region and trnL1, separated by trnV. Their total length ranged from 1816 bp to 1840 bp. In both species, the collective length of the 22 tRNA genes was 1433 bp, with individual tRNA genes varying from 61 bp to 71 bp. Notably, eight tRNA genes were encoded on the N-strand, while the remaining 14 genes were encoded on the J-strand, consistent with previous findings (Bernt et al. 2013; Cao et al. 2020).

Most tRNA genes exhibited a typical cloverleaf secondary structure, featuring a TΨC arm, an amino acid acceptor arm, an anticodon arm, and a dihydrouridine arm. However, an exception was observed in trnS1, where the dihydrouridine arm was absent in O. gossypii, forming a loop. Additionally, trnS1 of O. bicolor heraldus displayed an atypical cloverleaf structure, as depicted in Suppl. material 1, a pattern also observed in other species (Zhao et al. 2018).

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic relationships within Lygaeoidea were elucidated through the reconstruction of mitochondrial 13 PCGs using both BI and ML methods (Figs 6, 7). A total of 45 Lygaeoidea species were selected as the ingroup, with four species from Coreoidea and Pyrrhocoroidea serving as the outgroup. The resulting ML and BI trees exhibited slightly different topologies. Most families were consistently identified as monophyletic, except for Rhyparochromidae, which was paraphyletic. Dysdercus evanescens (Pyrrhocoroidea: Pyrrhocoridae) and Neolethaeus assamensis (Lygaeoidea: Rhyparochromidae) clustered together in both ML and BI trees (Figs 6, 7). The position of Colobathristidae proved to be unstable in the phylogenetic trees. In one instance, it clustered with Geocoridae with relatively low nodal support (Fig. 6), while another result indicated that Colobathristidae, Ninidae, and Blissidae formed a monophyletic group (Fig. 7). Furthermore, the two sequenced species of Oxycarenidae formed a single clade with a high support value.

Figure 6. 

Phylogenetic tree of Lygaeoidea inferred from ML based on 13 PCGs. The numbers on the branches show bootstrap values (values >60% are shown). Two Oxycarenidae species in this study are marked in red.

Figure 7. 

Phylogenetic tree of Lygaeoidea inferred from BI based on 13 PCGs. The numbers on the branches show posterior probabilities (values >0.50 are shown). Two Oxycarenidae species in this study are marked in red.

Discussion and conclusion

In this study, we redescribed two Oxycarenidae species: Oxycarenus gossypii and O. bicolor heraldus. We also detected misidentifications of two species in China. However, the sheer abundance and morphological similarities amongst oxycarenid species present challenges to providing an accurate morphology alone based classification.

The mitochondrial genomes of O. gossypii and O. bicolor heraldus were sequenced and analyzed, revealing a shared structural similarity. Both genomes exhibited a typical double-stranded ring structure housing 37 genes, including a non-coding control region. Remarkably, neither genome displayed any gene rearrangement, consistent with known genomic arrangements (Ding et al. 2023). The AT content significantly outweighed the CG content, showing a strong AT bias, a trait observed across various families within Pentatomomorpha (Guo and Yuan 2016). Our analysis of relative synonymous codon usage unveiled a prevalent preference for A/T codons, particularly at the termini of protein-coding genes, a phenomenon observed across all sequenced Pentatomomorpha (Hassanin et al. 2005; Guo and Yuan 2016). This nucleotide composition bias is believed to stem from a combination of mutational pressure and natural selection. The KA/KS analysis identified cox1 and cytb as the most conserved genes, whereas nad6 exhibited relatively higher evolutionary rates. Most protein-coding genes initiated translation using the start codon ATN, with the exception of cox1 (TTG). Additionally, three types of stop codons were identified: TAA, TAG, and an incomplete stop codon T. While most tRNA molecules exhibited a typical cloverleaf structure, trnS1 displayed an atypical cloverleaf structure in both species.

The monophyly of most families within Lygaeoidea was strongly supported, except for Rhyparochromidae, marking a deviation from Henry’s findings (1997). Neolethaeus assamensis (Lygaeoidea: Rhyparochromidae) clustering with Dysdercus evanescens (Pyrrhocoroidea: Pyrrhocoridae) in both ML and BI trees mirrored Gao and Dong’s (2023) results. The branches of Ischnorhynchinae, Lygaeinae, and Orsillinae formed a cohesive group designated as Lygaeidae, aligning with Gao and Dong’s findings (Gao and Dong 2023). The sister group relationship between Henestaris halophilus and Geocoris pallidipennis supported Henry’s (1997) earlier assertion. However, the phylogenetic position of Colobathristidae remained unstable in our PCG-based tree, in contrast to Ye et al.’s (2022) findings. Moreover, our results did not support the hypothesis that Colobathristidae and Berytidae formed sister groups, nor did they form the “malcid line” with Malcidae and Cymidae as proposed by Henry (1997). The formation of a monophyletic group by Blissidae and Ninidae, excluding Berytidae, diverged from the inferred relationship based on 18S rRNA (Xie et al. 2005). However, our examination validated the hypothesis that the two sequenced Oxycarenidae species constituted a single clade, with the position of Oxycarenidae remaining stable in both ML and BI phylogenetic trees. While our findings enrich the structural information of mitochondrial genomes, a comprehensive discussion on the phylogenetic relationships within Lygaeoidea remains challenging. For a deeper understanding of their evolutionary history, it is imperative that more Lygaeoidea species are sequenced in future studies.

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere gratitude to Professor Előd Kondorosy (Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences) for his invaluable insights and comments on the manuscript. Special thanks are also due to Shengchang Lai (Nanjing Forestry University) for assisting with data analysis. We appreciate the thoughtful feedback provided by Mallik Malipatil, Pablo Dellapé, Teng Li, which greatly contributed to the refinement of this work.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31402010), Major Project of Agricultural Biological Breeding (grant no. 2022ZD0401501), and the Highly Educated Talents Foundation in Nanjing Forestry University (grant no. G2014002).

Author contributions

Conceptualization, C.G. and C.M.; methodology, C.G., W.D. C.M.; investigation, C.G., C.M. and S.C.; funding acquisition, C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.; writing—review and editing, C.G. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Changjun Meng https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6968-8761

Suyan Cao https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4432-234X

Wen Dong https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6559-808X

Cuiqing Gao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0177-5161

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single–cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology 19(5): 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
  • Bergroth E (1918) Studies in Philippine Heteroptera, I. Philippine Journal of Science 13(2): 75–126.
  • Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF (2013) MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69(2): 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023
  • Cameron SL, Whiting MF (2008) The complete mitochondrial genome of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), and an examination of mitochondrial gene variability within butterflies and moths. Gene 408(1–2): 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2007.10.023
  • Clary DO, Wolstenholme DR (1985) The mitochondrial DNA molecular of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. Journal of molecular evolution 22(3): 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099755
  • Ding XF, Chen C, Wei JF, Gao XY, Zhang HF, Zhao Q (2023) Comparative mitogenomics and phylogenetic analyses of the genus Menida (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). ZooKeys 1138: 29–48. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1138.95626
  • Distant WL (1904) Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Rhynchota. Vol. II. (Heteroptera). Taylor and Francis, London, 503 pp.
  • Esaki T (1926) Verzeichniss der Hemiptera-Heteroptera der Insel Formosa. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, Budapest, 136–189.
  • Gao CQ, Dong W (2023) Characterization of two new Pylorgus mitogenomes (Hemiptera, Lygaeidae, Ischnorhynchinae) and a mitochondrial phylogeny of Lygaeoidea. ZooKeys 1166: 141–154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1166.104103
  • Grant JR, Stothard P (2008) The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 36(2): 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn179
  • Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of phyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  • Hassanin A, Léger N, Deutsch J (2005) Evidence for multiple reversals of asymmetric mutational constraints during the evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa, and consequences for phylogenetic inferences. Systematic Biology 54(2): 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150590947843
  • Henry TJ (1997) Phylogenetic analysis of family groups within the infraorder Pentatomomorpha (Hemiptera: Heteroptera), with emphasis on the Lygaeoidea. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90(3): 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/90.3.275
  • Horváth G (1926) Sur les Oxycarenus nuisibles aux cotonniers, avec la description d’une espèce nouvelle (Hem. Lygaeidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 31(11–12): 135–136. https://doi.org/10.3406/bsef.1926.27678
  • Hua JM, Li M, Dong PZ, Cui Y, Xie Q, Bu WJ (2008) Comparative and phylogenomic studies on the mitochondrial genomes of Pentatomomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera). BMC Genomics 9: 610. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-610
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment software Vvrsion 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28(12): 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199
  • Kirby WF (1891) Catalogue of the described Hemiptera, Heteroptera and Homoptera of Ceylon, based on the collection formed (chiefly at Pundaloya) by Mr. E. Ernest Green. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 24: 72–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1891.tb02479.x
  • Kocher A, Kamilari M, Lhuillier E, Coissac E, Péneau J, Chave J, Murienne J (2014) Shotgun assembly of the assassin bug Brontostoma colossus mitochondrial genome (Heteroptera, Reduviidae). Gene 552(1): 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.09.033
  • Küechler SM, Dettner K, Kehl S (2010) Molecular characterization and localization of the obligate endosymbiotic bacterium in the birch catkin bug Kleidocerys resedae (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae, Ischnorhynchinae). FEMS Microbiology Ecology 73(2): 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00890.x
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2017) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Li YL, Gu M, Liu XZ, Lin JN, Jiang HE, Song HY, Xiao XC, Zhou W (2023) Sequencing and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genomes of Toona sinensis and Toona ciliata reveal evolutionary features of Toona. BMC Genomics 24(1): 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09150-6
  • Lowe TM, Chan PP (2016) tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Research 44(1): 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw413
  • Massouras A, Hens K, Gubelmann C, Uplekar S, Decouttere F, Rougemont J, Cole ST, Deplancke B (2010) Primer-initiated sequence synthesis to detect and assemble structural variants. Nature Methods 7: 485–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.308
  • Péricart J (2001) Lygaeidae. In: Aukema B, Rieger C (Eds) Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region. The Netherlands Entomological Society, Amsterdam, 115 pp.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Shao RF, Kirkness EF, Barker SC (2009) The single mitochondrial chromosome typical of animals has evolved into 18 minichromosomes in the human body louse, Pediculus humanus. Genome Research 19(5): 904–912. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.083188.108
  • Slater JA (1964) A Catalogue of the Lygaeidae of the World: Vols. I–II. University of Connecticut, Storrs, 1668 pp.
  • Soria-Carrasco V, Talavera G, Igea J, Castresana J (2007) The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 23(21): 2954–2956. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm466
  • Sureshan SC, Tanavade RV, Ghosh S, Sella RN, Mohideen HS (2021) Complete mitochondrial genome sequencing of Oxycarenus laetus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) from two geographically distinct regions of India. Scientific Reports 11(1): 23738. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02881-0
  • Sweet MH (2000) Seed and chinch bugs (Lygaeoidea). In: Schaefer CW, Panizzi AR (Eds) Heteroptera of Economic Importance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 165–286. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420041859
  • Xiang CY, Gao FL, Jakovlić I, Lei HP, Hu Y, Zhang H, Zou H, Wang GT, Zhang D (2023) Using PhyloSuite for molecular phylogeny and tree-based analyses. iMeta 2(1): 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.87
  • Xie Q, Bu WJ, Zheng LY (2005) The Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of the 18S rRNA sequences from the main lineages of Trichophora (Insecta: Heteroptera: Pentatomomorpha). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 34(2): 448–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.10.015
  • Xue HJ, Bu WJ (2008) Morphology of abdominal evaporatoria in larvae of some Lygaeoidea (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera): function and bearing on classification. Journal of Natural History 42(1–2): 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930701825077
  • Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL (2012) Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-134
  • Ye F, Kment P, Rédei D, Luo JY, Wang YH, Küechler SM, Zhang WW, Chen PP, Wu HY, Wu YZ, Sun XY, Ding L, Wang YR, Xie Q (2022) Diversification of the phytophagous lineages of true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera) shortly after that of the flowering plants. Cladistics 38(4): 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12501
  • Zhao Q, Wang J, Wang MQ, Cai B, Zhang HF, Wei JF (2018) Complete mitochondrial genome of Dinorhynchus dybowskyi (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae: Asopinae) and phylogenetic analysis of Pentatomomorpha species. Journal of Insect Science 18(2): 44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey031
  • Zheng LY, Zou HG (1981) Lygaeidae. In: Hsiao TY, Ren SZ, Zheng LY, Jing XL, Zou HG, Liu SL (Eds) A Handbook for the Determination of the Chinese Hemiptera-Heteroptera, Vol. 2. Science Press, Beijing, 91–92. [In Chinese, with English summary]

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

The predicted secondary cloverleaf structure for the trnS1 of Oxycarenus bicolor heraldus and O. gossypii

Changjun Meng, Suyan Cao, Wen Dong, Cuiqing Gao

Data type: docx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (130.63 kb)
login to comment