Research Article |
Corresponding author: Xiang-Sheng Chen ( 921704595@qq.com ) Academic editor: Mariano Michat
© 2024 Ri-Xin Jiang, Ping-Lan Wu, Xiang-Sheng Chen.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Jiang R-X, Wu P-L, Chen X-S (2024) Five new species of the genus Grouvellinus Champion, 1923 from Guizhou Province, China (Coleoptera, Elmidae). ZooKeys 1219: 73-97. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1219.125754
|
The genus Grouvellinus Champion, 1923 comprises 60 described species distributed across the Oriental and Palearctic regions. Species diversity is very high in mainland China, with 28 recorded species. Here, the results of the aquatic beetle survey in Guizhou Province are presented; they began in 2021, when we collected more than 5000 specimens of riffle beetle. All specimens come from small ravine streams where inhabited submerged stones. Using morphological characters of adults such as body form and size, coloration, elytral, pronotal and ventral surface structures, and forms of male and female genitalia, five new species were discovered and are described: Grouvellinus loong sp. nov., G. buyi sp. nov., G. wangmoensis sp. nov., G. lihaitaoi sp. nov., G. muyinlini sp. nov. The species descriptions contain illustrations of diagnostic characters and measurements of metric characters such as body length, pronotal length, pronotal width, elytral length and width, and head length and width. The females are, on average, larger and have only slight differences in external morphology compared to the males. The comparative diagnoses discuss characters of the new and already known species. The results show that the existing species diversity requires more detailed research focusing on larger areas of South China in the future.
Aquatic beetle, Elminae, riffle beetles, Southwestern China, water environment
The aquatic beetle family Elmidae (also known as riffle beetles) has a worldwide distribution with its highest diversity in the tropics (
The genus Grouvellinus Champion, 1923 is widely distributed in the Oriental and Palearctic regions, and has included 60 known species (
Through our aquatic beetle survey in Guizhou Province, which began in 2021, a large number (more than 5000 specimens) of riffle beetles were collected, many of them belonging to the genus Grouvellinus. In the present paper, five new species of this genus are described and illustrated. A distribution map (Fig.
The examined material is deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China (GUGC). Label data are quoted verbatim. The Chinese translation of each locality below the provincial level is included in parentheses at its first appearance in the text. Each type specimen bears the following label: ‘HOLOTYPE (red) (or PARATYPE (yellow)), m# (or f#), Grouvellinus + specific name sp. nov., Jiang, Wu & Chen, 2024.’
Dissected parts were preserved in Euparal on plastic slides and were placed on the same pin with the specimen. Habitus images were taken using a Canon 5D Mark IV digital camera with MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 1–5× macro lens. A Godox MF12 flash was used as the light source. Images of the morphological structures were taken using a Canon 5D Mark IV digital camera with a Mitutoyo Plan NIR 10 lens and a Godox MF12 flash was used as the light source, or a Nikon SMZ25 stereoscopic microscope with a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera. Genitalia were soaked in 10% NaOH solution for half an hour, and dehydrated in 100% alcohol, then preserved in Euparal on plastic slides. Images of genitalia were taken using a Nikon N1-E microscope with a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera. Zerene Stacker v. 1.04 was used for image stacking. All images were modified and grouped into plates using Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended. Measurements of metric characters were taken by NIS-Elements AR, and added in Microsoft Excel to compute mean and standard deviations.
Morphological terminology and the format for the descriptions follow those of
Grouvellinus Champion, 1923: 168. Type species: Macronychus caucasicus Victor, 1839.
(42 exs: 21 ♂♂, 21 ♀♀): Holotype: China • ♂, labeled ‘China: Guizhou, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture (黔南布依族苗族自治州), Luodian County (罗甸县), Luokun Town (罗悃镇), Xiangshui Village (响水村), 25°19'43"N, 106°38'28"E, H: 666.10±6.40m, 09.XI.2022, Jiang Ri-Xin leg.’ (GUGC). Paratypes: China • 20 ♂♂, 21 ♀♀, with same label data as the holotype (GUGC).
Body obovate; elytra dark brown, with weak cupreous metallic luster, each elytron with yellowish brown spot at base and near apex. Elytral intervals III, V, VII, and VIII carinated; carinae granulated, those on interval III short, extending from base to ~ 1/3 of elytral length; other carinae long and extending from base nearly to elytral apex. Lateral margins of elytra granulated. Aedeagus with median lobe constricted near middle and in apical 1/3; apex narrowed, subacute. Parameres nearly as long as median lobes, strongly narrowed at basal 1/3, apex rounded, lateral portion with long setae at apical 1/3.
Male. Body obovate (Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Scutellum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Metaventrite (Fig.
Abdomen. Middle regions of ventrites I–IV and anterior part of ventrite V punctured (Fig.
Legs simple, surface granulated; femora widened, surface with plastron; inner side of tibiae with cleaning fringes; metatibiae (Fig.
Genitalia. Aedeagus (Fig.
Female. Externally similar to the male, averagely larger, metatibiae (Fig.
Male (n = 10): CL: 1.81–1.89 mm (1.85±0.03); PL: 0.51–0.54 mm (0.52±0.01), PW: 0.68–0.74 mm (0.70±0.02); EL: 1.30–1.35 mm (1.33±0.02), EW: 0.90–0.93 mm (0.91±0.01).
Female (n = 10): CL: 1.68–2.08 mm (1.90±0.12); PL: 0.49–0.63 mm (0.56±0.05), PW: 0.62–0.80 mm (0.71±0.06); EL: 1.20–1.45 mm (1.35±0.09), EW: 0.86–0.96 mm (0.91±0.04).
China (Guizhou).
All adults were collected from submerged stone in small ravine stream (Fig.
The specific epithet ‘loong’ is the most famous auspicious beast in Chinese ancient myth, and also is a member of the Chinese Zodiac Signs.
The new species can be placed in the Grouvellinus acutus species group by the following characters: 1) body small; 2) elytra with yellowish brown markings; 3) pronotum without longitudinal impression; 4) surface of elytra with granulate carinae on strial intervals III, V, VII, and VIII; 5) ventrite I with a pair of well-developed admedian carinae. The G. acutus species group includes three known species, all of them occurring in China. Members of this group are similar in habitus. G. loong sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from other members of this group by the obviously different shape of the aedeagus: strongly narrowed at middle (vs not as above).
Grouvellinus loong sp. nov. is most similar to G. acutus Bian & Jäch, 2018 in habitus. These species can be distinguished by the following characters: 1) prosternal process with weakly curved apex, surface not granulated, densely covered with large punctures in G. loong sp. nov. (vs prosternal process with broadly rounded apex, surface sparsely granulated in G. acutus); 2) metatibia distinctly narrowed near apex, without hooked appendage at apex in G. loong sp. nov. (vs apex of metatibia conspicuously broad and sclerotized, usually with hooked appendage in G. acutus); 3) parameres of aedeagus strongly narrowed at basal 1/3 in G. loong sp. nov. (vs only weakly narrowed near base in G. acutus).
(11 exs: 5 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀): Holotype: China • ♂, labeled ‘China: Guizhou, Guiyang City (贵阳市), Wudang District (乌当区), Xinbaobuyi Township (新堡布依族乡), Xiangzhigou Scenic Area (香纸沟景区), 26°47'02"N, 106°56'09"E, H: 1187m, 06.XI.2022, Jiang Ri-Xin leg.’ (GUGC). Paratypes: China • 4 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀, with same label data as the holotype (GUGC).
Body, long-oval, dark brown, surface shiny with cupreous metallic luster. Pronotum widest at basal 2/5, finely covered with small punctures, anterior and posterior angles densely covered with large punctures. Elytral intervals VII and VIII carinated, carinae granulated. Strial punctures of elytra very large in basal 2/3 and much smaller in apical 1/3. Sides of aedeagus generally subparallel in dorsal and ventral view, with median lobe slightly longer than parameres, distinctly curved in lateral view, apex narrowed and subacute. Parameres with apex rounded, lateral portion with long setae at apical 2/5.
Male. Body long-oval (Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Scutellum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Metaventrite (Fig.
Abdomen. Middle regions of ventrites I–IV and anterior part of ventrite V punctured (Fig.
Legs simple, surface granulated; femora widened, surface with plastron; inner side of tibiae with cleaning fringes; tarsi slightly shorter tibiae; tarsal claws simple.
Genitalia. Aedeagus (Fig.
Female. Externally similar to the male, averagely larger. Ovipositor as in Fig.
Male (n = 5): CL: 1.91–2.09 mm (1.96±0.07); PL: 0.58–0.59 mm (0.58±0.01), PW: 0.71–0.74 mm (0.72±0.01); EL: 1.32–1.50 mm (1.38±0.07), EW: 0.94–1.00 mm (0.97±0.02).
Female: CL (n = 6): 2.18–2.23 mm (2.21±0.02); PL: 0.62–0.65 mm (0.63±0.01), PW: 0.72–0.83 mm (0.77±0.04); EL: 1.56–1.58 mm (1.57±0.01), EW: 0.97–1.10 mm (1.01±0.05).
China: Guizhou.
All adults were collected from submerged stone in small ravine stream (Fig.
The specific epithet ‘buyi’ is a nation of Chinese, which is the majority nation of the type locality of this new species: Xinbaobuyi Township (Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China).
The new species is similar with Grouvellinus sinensis Grouvelle, 1906 and G. ligulaceus Bian & Zhang, 2023 in habitus. Grouvellinus buyi sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from G. ligulaceus by the following characters: 1) strial punctures of elytra very large in basal 1/2 (vs much smaller); 2) prosternal process with straight apex (vs weakly rounded); 3) median lobe of aedeagus slender (vs much broader); 4) parameres of aedeagus distinctly curved at apex (vs not as above).
The new species can be distinguished from G. sinensis by having a body with metallic luster and the surface of metaventrite and abdominal ventrites shiny, whereas the body lacks metallic luster and the surface of metaventrite and abdominal ventrites is distinctly rough in G. sinensis.
(31 exs: 11 ♂♂, 20 ♀♀): Holotype: China • ♂, labeled ‘China: Guizhou, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture (黔南布依族苗族自治州), Wangmo County (望谟县), Mashan Town (麻山镇), Kafa Village (卡法村), H: ~ 857 m, 10.VII.2022, Jiang Ri-Xin leg.’ (GUGC). Paratypes: China • 10 ♂♂, 20 ♀♀, with same label data as the holotype (GUGC).
Body long-oval, dark brown, with weak cupreous metallic luster. Pronotum widest at base, surface finely covered with small punctures, portions of anterior and posterior angles distinctly wrinkled. Base of pronotum with a pair of round foveae located at middle. Elytron interval VIII carinated. Median sulcus of metaventrite thin but distinct, extending from base to 3/4 length of metaventrite. Aedeagus with median lobe slightly longer than parameres, finely narrowed from basal 1/3 to apex, basal 1/6 distinctly narrowed, apex rounded and weakly expanded. Parameres of aedeagus very thin, weakly curved, apex rounded, lateral portion with long setae at apical 1/3, apex with several much longer setae.
Male. Body elongate-oval (Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Scutellum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Metaventrite (Fig.
Abdomen. Base of ventrite I (Fig.
Legs simple, surface granulated; femora widened, surface with plastron; inner side of tibiae with cleaning fringes; tarsi slightly shorter tibiae; tarsal claws simple.
Genitalia. Aedeagus (Fig.
Female. Externally similar to the male, averagely larger. Ovipositor as in Fig.
Male (n = 10): CL: 2.10–2.23 mm (2.18±0.04); PL: 0.60–0.62 mm (0.62±0.01), PW: 0.73–0.82 mm (0.76±0.03); EL: 1.49–1.61 mm (1.56±0.03), EW: 0.95–1.04 mm (0.99±0.03).
Female: CL (n = 10): 2.20–2.27 mm (2.24±0.02); PL: 0.56–0.64 mm (0.61±0.03), PW: 0.73–0.78 mm (0.76±0.02); EL: 1.61–1.63 mm (1.62±0.01), EW: 1.02–1.04 mm (1.03±0.01).
China: Guizhou.
All adults were collected from submerged stone in small ravine stream (Fig.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality: Wangmo County (Guizhou, China); the name is treated as an adjective.
The new species is similar to Grouvellinus pilosus Jeng & Yang, 1998, G. huaxiensis Jiang, Huang & Chen, 2023, G. muyinlini sp. nov., and G. lihaitaoi sp. nov. in habitus. Grouvellinus wangmoensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from G. pilosus by the following characters: 1) base of pronotum with a pair of rounded foveae in middle (vs with a pair of elongate oval impressions), 2) granulated carinae present on elytron strial interval VIII (vs granulated carinae present on elytron strial interval VII). The new species can be easily distinguished from the other three species mentioned above by the sublateral carinae of pronotum being very short, not in contact with the oblique impression, and by the thin slender parameres of the aedeagus.
(82 exs: 19 ♂♂, 13 ♀♀: 50 exs., sex undetermined): Holotype: China • ♂, labeled ‘China: Guizhou, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture (黔南布依族苗族自治州), Longli (龙里县), Wantanhe Town (湾滩河镇), H: 1136.10±1.08m, 26°12'52"N, 106°59'27"E, 31.VIII.2023, Jiang Ri-Xin, Hai-Tao Li, Pin Li, Yu-Hao Zhang, Yin-Lin Mu & Xiu-Dong Huang leg.’ (GUGC). Paratypes: China • 18 ♂♂, 13 ♀♀, 50 exs., sex undetermined, with same label data as the holotype (GUGC).
Body elongate-oval, dark brown, shiny, with weak cupreous metallic luster. Pronotum widest at base, disc covered with dense small round punctures, surface of posterior angles granulated, middle of base a pair of small round foveae. Elytral interval VIII carinated, carina granulated. Median sulcus of metaventrite thin but distinct, extending from base to 1/2 length of mataventrite. Aedeagus with median lobe distinctly longer than parameres, base distinctly narrowed, apex narrowed, subacute. Parameres wide, apex rounded, outer sides weakly sinuate, lateral portion with long setae at apical 1/6.
Male. Body long-oval (Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Scutellum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Metaventrite (Fig.
Base of ventrite I (Fig.
Legs simple, surface granulated; femora widened, surface with plastron; inner side of tibiae with cleaning fringes; tarsi slightly shorter tibiae; tarsal claws simple.
Aedeagus (Fig.
Female. Externally similar to the male, averagely larger. Ovipositor as in Fig.
Male (n = 10): CL: 1.77–2.13 mm (1.88±0.10); PL: 0.49–0.61 mm (0.55±0.04), PW: 0.61–0.77 mm (0.69±0.05); EL: 1.28–1.51 mm (1.38±0.06), EW: 0.78–0.98 mm (0.87±0.06).
Female: CL (n = 10): 1.87–1.99 mm (1.93±0.05); PL: 0.52–0.54 mm (0.53±0.01), PW: 0.64–0.67 mm (0.65±0.01); EL: 1.27–1.44 mm (1.38±0.06), EW: 0.84–0.92 mm (0.88±0.03).
China: Guizhou.
All adults were collected from submerged stone in small ravine stream (Fig.
The species epithet honors our friend and colleague Dr. Hai-Tao Li (Guizhou University), one of the collectors of the new species; the name is treated as an adjective.
The new species is most similar to Grouvellinus muyinlini sp. nov. It can be distinguished from that species by the following characters: pronotum widest at base (vs widest near middle); median sulcus of metaventrite short, ~ 1/2 the length of metaventrite (vs much longer, ~ 3/4 the length of metaventrite); parameres of aedeagus much wider, apex nearly straight (vs parameres much narrower, apex curved).
(40 exs: 20 ♂♂, 20 ♀♀): Holotype: China • ♂, labeled ‘China: Guizhou, Guiyang City (贵阳市), Huaxi District (花溪区), Qiantao Buyi and Miao Township (黔陶布依族苗族自治乡), Machang Village (马场村), Raolongxiagu (绕拢峡谷), H: 1084 m, 26°19'12"N, 106°46'19"E, 13.VII.2022, Jiang Ri-Xin, Yin-Lin Mu, Tian-Jun Liu & Feng-E Li leg.’ (GUGC). Paratypes: China • 19 ♂♂, 20 ♀♀, with same label data as the holotype (GUGC).
Body elongate-oval, dark brown with antenna, elytra and tibia pale brown, surface shiny with weak cupreous metallic luster. Elytral interval VIII carinated. Pronotum widest near middle, disc with dense small punctures, portions of posterior angles granulated, base of pronotum with a pair of median foveae. Median sulcus of metaventrite thin but distinct, extending from base to 3/4 length of metaventrite. Aedeagus with median lobe distinctly longer than parameres, constricted at base, finely narrowed from basal 1/5 to apex, apex rounded. Parameres thinner and shorter than median lobe, weakly sinuated and curved at apex, lateral portion with long setae at apical 1/6.
Male. Body elongate-oval (Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Scutellum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Metaventrite (Fig.
Abdomen. Base of ventrite I (Fig.
Legs simple, surface granulated; femora widened, surface covered with sericeous tomentum; inner side of tibiae with cleaning fringes; tarsi slightly shorter than tibiae; tarsal claws simple.
Genitalia. Aedeagus (Fig.
Female. Externally similar to the male, averagely larger. Ovipositor as in Fig.
Male (n = 10): CL: 1.78–2.09 mm (1.89±0.09); PL: 0.49–0.58 mm (0.53±0.03), PW: 0.62–0.68 mm (0.65±0.02); EL: 1.26–1.52 mm (1.35±0.07), EW: 0.81–0.90 mm (0.86±0.03).
Female (n = 10): CL: 1.90–2.11 mm (2.00±0.07); PL: 0.55–0.59 mm (0.57±0.01), PW: 0.68–0.72 mm (0.70±0.01); EL: 1.36–1.52 mm (1.42±0.07), EW: 0.85–1.02 mm (0.92±0.05).
China: Guizhou.
All adults were collected from submerged stone in small ravine stream (Fig.
Habitat of Grouvellinus species A general environment of the type locality of G. lihaitaoi sp. nov. B living adult of G. lihaitaoi sp. nov. C general environment of G. muyinlini sp. nov. D dr. Yin-Lin Mu working in the type locality of G. muyinlini sp. nov. E the first author working in the same locality as ditto F general environment of G. wangmoensis sp. nov.
The species epithet honors our friend and colleague Dr. Yin-Lin Mu (Guizhou University), one of the collectors of the new species; the name is treated as an adjective.
Grouvellinus muyinlini sp. nov. is most similar to G. lihaitaoi sp. nov. For differences see the comparative diagnosis of G. lihaitaoi sp. nov.
Recent papers suggested that the genus Grouvellinus has a potentially high diversity in Southeast Asia, and particularly in South China (
Some Grouvellinus species are highly similar in habitus. However, a simple clustering combined with morphological study is helpful to effectively distinguish species of this group. Moreover, the true diversity of this group in China still needs to be unveiled, especially in the mountain and karst areas of South China.
The authors express their sincere gratitude to Mr. Tian-Jun Liu, Miss Yu-Hao Zhang, Drs Yin-Lin Mu, Hai-Tao Li, Pin Li, and Feng-E Li (Guizhou University, Guiyang, China), and Mr. Xiu-Dong Huang (Anshun, China) for their help with our investigation, and to Dr. Zhi-Teng Chen (Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China) for his support of this work. Miss Jade Li (University of Florida, USA) kindly revised the English of this work. We also thank Dr. Zu-Qi Mai (Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong, China) for his support of this work. Appreciation is also given to Dr. Ján Kodada (Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia), Mariano C. Michat (University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina), and an anonymous referee for providing constructive suggestions.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
Financial support was provided by the Program of Excellent Innovation Talents, Guizhou Province (No. 20154021).
Funding acquisition: X-SC. Investigation: P-LW. Writing - original draft: R-XJ, P-LW. Writing - review and editing: X-SC.
Ri-Xin Jiang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5339-853X
Ping-Lan Wu https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7089-7861
Xiang-Sheng Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-0343
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.