Research Article
Print
Research Article
Two new species of the treehopper genus Enchenopa Amyot & Serville, 1843 (Hemiptera, Membracidae) from northwest Ecuador
expand article infoMaría P. Rueda-Rodríguez, Jorge L. Montalvo-Salazar
‡ Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Ecuador
Open Access

Abstract

Enchenopa Amyot & Serville, 1843 is a diverse treehopper genus widespread across the New World. We describe two new Enchenopa species from northwest Ecuador: Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. from urban forest remnants at the foothills of the Andes cordillera and Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. from secondary montane forests. Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. is placed in the E. biplaga species group and is distinguished by the sexual dimorphism of the pronotal horn and lateral carina shape, the straight metopidium, 2–4 accessory carinae and the whitish dorsal spot and subapical band. Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. belongs to the E. andina species group and is diagnosed by its reddish central carina and posterior pronotal process apex, presence of an obtuse projection rather than an anterior horn, three or four irregular accessory carinae, and apical amber forewing patch. Illustrations, notes on natural history, and keys to species of the E. biplaga and E. andina species groups are also provided.

Key words

Membracinae, Membracini, Tandayapa, taxonomy, Tropical Andes, urban green spaces

Introduction

Enchenopa Amyot & Serville, 1843 is a diverse New World treehopper genus belonging to Membracinae, the second most specious subfamily of the New World Membracidae (Bartlett et al. 2018). It is differentiated from other Membracini genera by the horn-shaped anterior process or obtuse projection on the pronotum with a lateral carina running from the apex of the anterior process to, usually, the lateral margin of pronotum, and two or more pairs of accessory carinae on the metopidium (Strümpel and Strümpel 2014). Enchenopa is most similar to Enchophyllum Amyot & Serville, 1843 due to the pronotal horn and lateral carinae, but it differs mainly in the presence of the accessory carinae and the lateral carina usually surpassing the humeral angles. Enchenopa can be distinguished from Membracis Fabricius, 1775, Folicarina Sakakibara, 1992, and Phyllotropis Stål, 1869 by the non-foliaceus pronotum, presence of a pronotal horn, and the carination which is typically absent in Membracis and reduced in Folicarina and Phyllotropis; although Folicarina also has accessory carinae (Flórez-V et al. 2015; McKamey 2022). Richter (1947, 1954) noted that some Membracis species occasionally have a short lateral carina and, Enchophyllum and Enchenopa can vary intraspecifically in the length of the lateral carina. Lastly, Enchenopa can only be differentiated accurately from Leioscyta Fowler, 1894 by the accessory carinae, which are absent in the latter. Some Leioscyta are also smaller species, lack lateral carinae, and the pronotum is rounded (Dietrich and McKamey 1995). Enchenopa is not supported by any synapomorphies, and phylogenetic studies have suggested that it, as well as its related genera, may not be monophyletic (Dietrich and McKamey 1995; Lin et al. 2004).

Strümpel and Strümpel (2014) revised Enchenopa and recognized 51 valid species, including 21 new to science, and classified them into ten species groups. They also treated Campylenchia Stål, 1869 as a junior synonym. Since then, only one more species of the E. andina species group has been described from Brazil (Lencioni-Neto and Sakakibara 2015). McKamey (2022) reinstated four more species excluded from the genus by Strümpel and Strümpel (2014) however, the types are not in a good state of preservation and he could not evaluate possible synonymy.

The biology of most species of Enchenopa is poorly known. Some species are solitary but occasionally congregations of adults with nymphs can be found. There is no parental care; instead, the females deposit their eggs in clusters on their host plant covered with a white wax-like substance that protects them from parasitoids (Godoy et al. 2006; Lin 2006). They have been reported to have mutualistic relationships with ants and to feed on host plants from at least 32 families of which Fabaceae and Asteraceae are the most predominant (Flórez-V et al. 2015). Enchenopa binotata (Say, 1824) is undoubtedly the most studied species of the genus, and its mating signals and host plant specialization suggest that this taxon comprises a complex of as many as 15 species (McNett and Cocroft 2008; Hamilton and Cocroft 2009; Deitz and Wallace 2012).

Species of Enchenopa are distributed from Canada to Argentina, but most species inhabit the Neotropical region. Strümpel and Strümpel (2014) recorded 12 species in Ecuador. Nevertheless, they could not review enough material, especially, from the Andean region. Previously Goding (1928) registered the species E. lanceolata (Fabricius, 1787), E. quadricolor (Walker, 1858), E. minans (Fairmaire, 1846) and E. tatei (Goding, 1928) in Ecuador not recorded by Strümpel and Strümpel (2014).

In this study, we describe two new species of Enchenopa from northwestern Ecuador, one of which was found in the forest remnants of a populous city at the foothills of the Andean Cordillera, and the second species from secondary montane forests. Additionally, we provide keys to species of the Enchenopa biplaga and E. andina species groups to which the newly described species belong.

Materials and methods

Fieldwork was conducted between 2023 and 2024 in two locations in northwest Ecuador, urban forest remnants of Santo Domingo (Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas) composed of patches of secondary semi-deciduous forest and located next to water bodies between 300 and 600 m of elevation, and Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station (Pichincha), a scientific station of Universidad San Francisco de Quito founded in 2022 and located in the Tandayapa Valley at 2280 m of elevation. The station covers 53 hectares of secondary and mature Montane Forest. Specimens were collected opportunistically during the day and euthanized in 75% ethanol. Observations of natural history were recorded in situ. A light trap with a mercury lamp was set up in Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station from 6 pm to 6 m in February 2024, and all membracid specimens were collected. We also examined specimens deposited at the Museo de Zoología Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador (ZSFQ), where all our specimens are deposited.

The specimens were photographed and measured using an Olympus DP73 digital camera attached to the Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with the light diffused as adapted from Kerr et al. (2008). The measurements were taken following Strümpel and Strümpel (2014). To examine the genitalia, we removed the entire abdomens and cleared them using 10% KOH for 48 hours at room temperature and then washed with distilled water. Genitalia were photographed using an OMAX A35180U3 digital camera attached to Olympus CX22 optic microscope and afterwards preserved in a 0.2-ml microvial with glycerol pinned with their respective specimen. Images were compiled in one multifocal composition using Zerene Stacker - USDA SI-SEL Lab Bk imaging system. The illustrations were made digitally with Sketchbook, a free access illustration software. Final images were edited in Adobe Photoshop CC 2023.

Terminology of general morphology follows Deitz (1975), Dietrich et al. (2001), and Strümpel and Strümpel (2006, 2014).

Results

Key to species of Enchenopa biplaga species group (modified from Strümpel and Strümpel 2014)

1 Pronotum with one white or yellow dorsal spot 2
Pronotum with one white or yellow dorsal spot and one white or yellow subapical band 3
2 Pronotal horn short, curved forward, dorsal spot always yellow E. ignidorsum Walker
Pronotal horn long and straight, white or yellow dorsal spot E. vittifera Stål
3 Pronotum with horn length shorter than distance between tips of humeral angles or horn absent 4
Pronotum with horn longer than distance between tips of humeral angles 7
4 Metopidium with two accessory carinae, the posterior one half to almost as long as lateral carina 5
Metopidium with two to four accessory carinae, all < 1/2 length of lateral carina 6
5 Pronotal horn curved forwards; lateral carina just surpassing the corner of humeral angles; posterior accessory carinae almost length of lateral carina. Males / females with dorsal spot 2 × / 4 × as long as subapical band E. longimaculata Strümpel & Strümpel
Pronotal horn straight; lateral carina almost touching lateral pronotal margin; posterior accessory carinae 1/2 length of lateral carina; dorsal spot and lateral band not sexually dimorphic E. singularis Strümpel & Strümpel
6 Metopidium convex and two to three accessory carinae. Male and female not dimorphic. Overall color brown to black E. biplaga Walker
Metopidium straight with two to four accessory carinae. Male with narrow horn curved forwards and female with only obtuse projection; male shorter than female. Overall color black E. gennyae sp. nov.
7 Pronotum with horn curved, directed forward 8
Pronotum with horn straight 9
8 Length from pronotum base to horn apex equal to distance from pronotum base to posterior apex of pronotum E. dubia (Fowler)
Length from pronotum base to horn apex shorter than distance from pronotum base to posterior apex of pronotum E. lanceolata Fabricius
9 Pronotum with horn distinctly longer than body width, lateral carina just surpassing horn base E. reticornuta Strümpel & Strümpel
Pronotum with horn slightly longer than body width, lateral carina almost touching lateral pronotum margin E. richteri Strümpel & Strümpel

Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, 3, 4

Material examined

Holotype : Ecuador • 1 ♀; Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Santo Domingo, Río Baba -0.30295, -79.15211, 480 m; 12 May 2023; Montalvo, J. & Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Manual ZSFQ-i12112. Paratypes: Ecuador • 2 ♂; same labels as for holotype; ZSFQ-i12110, ZSFQ-i12111 • 2 ♀, 1 ♂ Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Santo Domingo, Quebrada del Río Pove -0.25237, -79.156668, 570 m; 14 Aug. 2023; Rueda, M. P. & Montalvo, J. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i17766:17768 • 3 ♀, 1 ♂ same locality as paratypes; 20 Apr. 2024; Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i18855:18858.

Notes on the type series

All specimens are minuten-mounted. Dissected abdomens of the holotype and two female and two male paratypes were placed in vials with glycerol pinned beneath the specimens. Some paratypes are in poor condition, with legs or wings lost.

Additional material

Ecuador • 3 5th instars; same data as paratypes; ZSFQ-i17925, 17926.

Diagnosis

Overall color black with whitish dorsal spot and subapical band; metopidium straight, two to four sub-equal accessory carinae. Sexually dimorphic: female with obtuse projection instead of horn, short lateral carina not surpassing humeral angles, dorsal spot 2× longer than subapical band, and longer than male in size; male with narrow horn slightly curved forwards, lateral carinae almost touching lateral margin of pronotum and dorsal spot subequal in length to subapical band.

Description

Female holotype (ZSFQ-i12112). Measurements (mm): Length from head to wings at rest: 5.7; Total length: 6.3; Head to apex of posterior process: 4.6; Pronotal length: 4.4; Head to horn apex: 2.4; Forewing length: 4.9; Body width: 1.9; Vertex width on ocellar line: 1; Head length: 1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.8; Frontoclypeus width: 0.7; Prothoracic tibia length: 0.9; Metathoracic tibia length: 1.4; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.3; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.3.

Color. Overall black with whitish dorsal spot and subapical band on dorsum. Dorsal spot 2× longer than subapical band. Eyes black with dark brown margins, ocelli golden. Forewings opaque dull black, hind wings hyaline, veins black. Tarsi golden.

Surface. Head, pronotum, ventral sclerites of thorax, legs, and abdomen with dense golden pubescence; subcostal cell and veins of forewings with short, dispersed, almost indistinguishable golden pubescence. Pronotum (except metopidium) strongly punctured. Head, metopidium, forewings, and legs rough.

Head. Triangular, longer than wide (avoiding eyes); ocelli closer to eyes than each other; supra-antennal ledges arranged above clypeus; clypeus broad, longer than wide, anterior margin rounded; rostrum reaching hind coxae (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1. 

Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. holotype female A–C habitus in frontal, dorsal view, and lateral views respectively D illustration of pronotum showing the carination. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 2 mm (B, C).

Thorax. Pronotum somewhat compressed, in lateral view, triangular, dorsal contour arched; metopidium straight, inclined anteriorly; horn reduced to an obtuse projection, obliquely directed dorso-anteriorly, wider than long, apex broadly rounded; median carina laminated and somewhat foliaceous, especially on dorsum; lateral carina short, not extending beyond humeral angles (Fig. 1C); three parallel accessory carinae, almost as long as lateral carina extending ventroposteriorly from projection apex; posterior apex of pronotum acuminate almost reaching the apex of first apical cell (Fig. 1D); humeral angles slightly produced (Fig. 1B). Forewings with five apical cells, one discoidal cell, and one vein in the clavus, one r-m crossvein, two m-cu crossveins, and without s crossvein; apical limbus broad. Hind wings with four apical cells and one r-m crossvein. Anterior and middle tibiae foliaceous; posterior femur with apical, ventral and middle cucullate setae, metathoracic tibia compressed with spine-like cucullate setae on rows I and II, row III absent.

Abdomen. Sternum III with a transverse keel extending along the sternite and slightly projected ventrally. Dorsum of tergites VII and VIII with medial tuberosities, tergites IV–VI with reduced medial tuberosities (Fig. 2A). Genitalia. Gonoplac ventrally with few setae and more sclerotized, apex rounded (Fig. 2B). First valvula blade shaped, apex ventrally rounded, dorsally acuminate extending beyond ventral margin (Fig. 2C). Second valvula broad throughout, dorsally rounded, ventrally weakly serrated with a ventral apical tooth directed upwards (Fig. 2D, E).

Figure 2. 

Abdomen and terminalia of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. A undissected female abdomen in lateral view B gonoplac in lateral view C first valvula in lateral view D second valvula in lateral view E close-up apex of second valvula F undissected male pygofer in lateral view G styles in dorsal view H aedeagus in lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 0.1 mm (B–D); 0.01 mm (E); 0.2 mm (F); 0.05 mm (G, H).

Male paratype (ZSFQi-17766). Similar to female except dorsal spot as long as subapical band, pronotal horn narrow and curved forwards, lateral carina almost touching lateral margin of pronotum, metopidium with three accessory carinae at each side. Genitalia. Subgenital plate, in lateral view, 3× longer than wide, lobes diverging in first 1/4, dorsal margin concave, distally expanded (Fig. 2F). Styles 5× as long as wide, anterior projection subequal to posterior projection; shank with notch at middle of ventral margin, distally recurved and apically truncate, slightly expanded with posterior end longer and narrower than anterior end (Fig. 2G). Aedeagus U-shaped with anterior arm smaller than posterior arm and rounded; posterior arm lanceolate and abruptly narrowed at 1/3 length, anterior surface smooth, without serrations (Fig. 2H).

Variation

Measurements. Male / Female (mm): Length from head to wings: 4.4–5.1 / 5.3–5.8; Total length: 4.9–5.6 / 6.2–6.3; Head to apex of posterior process: 3.8–4.5 / 4.58–5; Pronotal length: 3.8–5.5 / 4.4–5.3; Head to horn apex: 2.2–2.7 / 2.4–2.9; Forewing length: 3.7–4.2 / 4.5–5.1; Body width: 1.6–1.7 / 1.9–2; Vertex width on ocellar line: 0.9–1 / 1.0–1.1; Head length: 1.1–1.2 / 1–1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.7–0.8 / 0.7–0.8; Frontolypeus width: 0.7 / 0.7–0.8; Metathoracic tibia length: 0.8–1 / 0.9–1; Prothoracic tibia length: 1.2–1.4 / 1.4–1.8; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.2–0.3 / 0.3–0.5; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.3–0.4 / 0.3.

Females longer than males, with obtuse projection instead of horn, dorsal spot 2× longer than subapical band, lateral carina not surpassing humeral angles and, in some individuals, weakly produced; two to four secondary carinae almost as long as lateral carina. Male with horn narrow and curved forwards, dorsal spot < 2× subapical band length (Fig. 3A–C), lateral carina almost attaining lateral margin of pronotum and metopidum with three accessory carinae on each side (Fig. 3D). Independent of gender, dorsal contour of pronotum is more or less arched.

Figure 3. 

Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. paratype male and nymph A–C male habitus in frontal, dorsal view, and lateral views respectively D illustration of male pronotum showing the carination E nymph habitus in lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 2 mm (B, C, E).

Fifth-instar nymph description

Overall color mostly white with black tarsi and scoli (Fig. 3E). One pair of abdominal scoli on each segment from III to VII; scoli length 5–6× basal width. Pronotum anteriorly with nascent horn not extended beyond head and posteriorly extended to abdominal segment III; anterior apex rounded and directed forward; posterior apex acute, dorsal margin convex in middle. Needle-like setae on chalazae distributed over whole body.

Distribution and natural history

Specimens of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. were found in two secondary forest remnants of the Western Foothills Forest from the urban area of ​​Santo Domingo (Fig. 9): on the banks of the Baba River (Fig. 4C) and Pove River’s ravine (Fig. 4D). Adult and nymph congregations were found on several occasions cohabiting together and perched on the underside of leaves and stems of an unidentified species of the genus Piper L. between 100 and 150 cm above the ground (Fig. 4A). Females were always more abundant than males in these congregations. Nymphs were attended by fire ants of the species Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger) (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4. 

Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. in its natural environment and habitat A male paratype perched on a stem of its host plant B nymphs attended by Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger) C shore of Baba River D ravine of Pove River.

Etymology

The species is dedicated to the mother of the first author, Genny Elizabeth Rodríguez Cueva, who helped to find the specimens of this species and has been a great support and inspiration throughout her life.

Remarks

Females of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. have a short lateral carina that does not extend beyond the humeral angles, while males have a long lateral carina that almost reaches the lateral margin of pronotum. In the tribe Membracini, the length of the lateral carina has not been previously reported as sexually dimorphic in any species. However, in some species of Membracis, it has been noted that the lateral carina may or may not be present among individuals (Richter 1947). Likewise, Richter (1954) argued the lateral carina of some species of Enchophyllum and Enchenopa can vary in length within the same population. This species is the first known in the Enchenopa biplaga species group to exhibit sexual dimorphism in pronotum shape and lateral carina length. Like Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov., E. longimaculata Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 has remarkable sexual dimorphism of the dorsal spot. However, in Enchenopa longimaculata the females the spot is 4× the length of the subapical band and in males 2× while in E. gennyae sp. nov. the spot is 2× as long in females but subequal in males.

Sexual dimorphism in the shape of the pronotal horn is characteristic of the Enchenopa minuta species group. However, Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. does not belong to that group, given its coloration, the shape of the second valvula and, more importantly, the female’s lack of a pronotal horn; in the E. minuta species group, males lack the horn and females generally have a developed horn.

Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. belongs to the E. biplaga species group due to the presence of bands on dorsum of the pronotum, the second valvula with a ventral apical tooth, and forewings with one discoidal cell. Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. differs from E. ignidorsum (Walker, 1858) and E. vittifera (Stål, 1869) by the two white lateral bands instead of just one yellow or white one, respectively. Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. differs from E. dubia (Fowler, 1894), E. lanceolata, E. reticornuta Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014, and E. richteri Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 by a horn shorter than the distance between the tips of humeral angles rather than longer. Enchenopa singularis Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 and E. longimaculata have two accessory carinae with the posterior one ~ 1/2 or almost the total length, respectively, of the lateral carina, while E. gennyae sp. nov. has from two to four somewhat subequal accessory carinae. E. gennyae sp. nov. is distinguished from E. melaleuca Walker, 1858 by the shorter horn that is not curved forward. The new species closely resembles Enchenopa biplaga Walker, 1858 due to the shape of the pronotal horn, pronotum coloration, and the disposition of the accessory carinae. However, Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. has a straight metopidium, less produced horn, and sexual dimorphism. In contrast, in E. biplaga the metopidium is convex, the horn is large and strongly produced, and without sexual dimorphism. The females of E. gennyae sp. nov. have a short and straight horn while E. biplaga females have the horn longer than wide and curved forward. In males of E. gennyae sp. nov. the posterior arm of the aedeagus, in lateral view, is abruptly narrowed at one-third of its length, and the apical hook of the styles has the posterior tooth longer and narrower than the anterior tooth. In contrast, in the male of E. biplaga the width of the posterior arm of the aedeagus, in lateral view, slightly decreases at half of its length, and the apical hook of the styles has the posterior tooth similar in size to the anterior tooth.

McKamey (2022) reinstated Enchenopa melaleuca from the genus Enchophyllum and suggested it shares morphological similarities with some species of the E. biplaga species group. However, the holotype of this species has yet to be reviewed to confirm these affinities. Therefore, excluded E. melaleuca from the key to E. biplaga group species but compared it with E. gennyae sp. nov. in the above discussion.

In the E. biplaga species group, nymphs of E. reticornuta and E. vittifera are known (Strümpel and Strümpel 2014). They share with the nymph of E. gennyae sp. nov. the body covered with white wax-like material, black tarsi, and the presence of scoli on abdominal tergites III–VIII. However, we found the nymphs of E. gennyae sp. nov. differ from them mainly in the shape of the pronotum and scoli. The nymphs of Enchenopa vittifera have a longer horn directed forward with the posterior apex of the pronotum reaching the abdominal tergite III and have shorter scoli. While the nymphs of Enchenopa reticornuta have a straight horn with the posterior apex of the pronotum not touching the abdomen and longer scoli widened at the base.

Key of species of Enchenopa andina group (modified from Strümpel and Strümpel 2014; Lencioni-Neto and Sakakibara 2015)

1 Pronotal horn horizontally directed forwards E. loranthacina Sakakibara & Marques
Pronotal horn obliquely directed upwards and forwards or horn absent and replaced by an obtuse projection 2
2 Head as long as wide or wider than long 3
Head longer than wide 4
3 Head as long as wide, body with long pubescence, forewings with a medial pale patch E. pilosa Strümpel & Strümpel
Head wider than long, body with short pubescence, forewings without a medial pale patch E. eurycephala Strümpel & Strümpel
4 Median carina or just posterior apex of pronotum reddish, apical 1/3 of forewings amber 5
Median carina and posterior apex of pronotum concolorous, forewing with hyaline patch at apical margin 6
5 Pronotal horn well produced; two to three accessory carinae well developed E. andina Schmidt
Pronotal horn absent, replaced by obtuse projection; three to four weak and irregular accessory carinae present, some touching lateral carina E. chocoandina sp. nov.
6 Pronotal accessory carinae well developed; forewing apical patch occupying all of distal margin and extended basad to middle of apical cells 3 and 4 E. monoceros (Germar)
Pronotum with accessory carinae weak; forewing apical patch small, occupying only part of limbus E. luizae Lencioni-Neto & Sakakibara

Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov.

Figs 5, 6, 7, 8

Material examined

Holotype : Ecuador • 1 ♂; Pichincha, Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station -0.009645, -78.688058, 2280 m of elevation; 3 Fbr. 2024; Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i18060. Paratypes: Ecuador • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; ZSFQ-i18061 • 3 ♀, 1 ♂; Pichincha, Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station -0.009645, -78.688058, 2280 m of elevation; 9 Fbr. 2024; López-García, M. M., Montalvo, J. & Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Mercury light; ZSFQ-i10862: 10865 • 1 ♀; Pichincha, Mindo, 0.04166, -78.77472, 1300 m of elevation; 11 Jun. 2022; Torres, D. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i8423 • 1 ♀, Imbabura, Seis de Julio de Cuellaje, 0.4509352, -78.525948, 2000 m of elevation; 13 Nov. 2021; Rubio, A. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i8196.

Note on the type series

Holotype and most paratypes are minuten-mounted. The paratype female ZSFQ-i8243 was originally pinned, but later the specimen was transferred to double mounting on a minuten pin. Dissected abdomens of holotype, one male paratype, and three female specimens placed in vials with glycerol pinned with specimens.

Diagnosis

Overall coloration black with scarlet median carina and posterior apex in females and scarlet posterior apex in males, apical 1/3 of forewing amber; pronotal horn absent, replaced by obtuse projection directed obliquely forwards, lateral carina almost touching lateral margin of pronotum; three or four weak accessory carinae, some touching lateral carinae or bifurcate.

Description

Male holotype (ZSFQ-i10860): Measurements (mm): Length from head to wings: 5.3; Total length: 5.4; Head to apex of posterior process: 4.5; Pronotal length: 4.6; Head to horn apex: 1.5; Forewing length: 4.4; Body width: 2.2; Vertex width on ocellar line: 1.2; Head length: 1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.7; Frontoclypeus width: 0.1; Metathoracic tibia length: 0.9; Prothoracic tibia length: 1.8; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.3; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.2.

Color. Overall color black. Eyes brownish, ocelli golden. Posterior apex of pronotum scarlet red. Forewings almost entirely opaque black with an apical translucent amber patch restricted on the third to fifth apical cells and limbus around this area. Tarsi pale brownish.

Surface. Head, pronotum, ventral sclerites of thorax, legs, and abdomen with golden pubescence (Fig. 5B); sclerotized area of forewings with shorter pubescence. Pronotum (except by metopidium) and sclerotized area of forewings strongly punctured. Head, metopidium, legs, and abdomen rough.

Figure 5. 

Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. holotype male A–C habitus in frontal, dorsal view, and lateral views respectively D approach to base of horn in lateral view, the white arrows indicate the accessory carinae. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 2 mm (B, C).

Head. Triangular blunt, longer than wide (excluding eyes); distance between ocelli subequal to ocelli-eye distance; supra-antennal ledges arranged above clypeus; clypeus broad, longer than wide, anterior margin rounded; rostrum reaching posterior coxae (Fig. 5A).

Thorax. Pronotum, in lateral view, triangular; metopidium straight directed forwards; pronotal horn absent instead an obtuse projection with rounded apex; humeral angles slightly produced (Fig. 5B); median carina sharp; lateral carina parallel to median carina, running from apex of anterior projection to middle of the lateral margin of pronotum, almost touching the margin (Fig. 5C); three accessory carinae short (1/10 length of lateral carina), weak, irregular, sub-perpendicular to primary lateral carina, the last two diverging from the lateral carina (Fig. 5D), left side with the anterior two accessory carinae convergent; posterior apex of pronotum acuminate, just surpassing first apical cell. Forewing with one vein on clavus, two discoidal cells, two m-cu cross veins, one s cross veins which enclose second discoidal cell, and five apical cells; apical limbus broad. Anterior and middle tibiae foliaceous; posterior femur with apical ventral and middle cucullate setae, posterior tibia with spine-like cucullate setae on rows I and II, row III absent.

Abdomen. Sternum III with a transversal keel extended along the sternite, strongly projected downwards and medially invaginated. Tergites III to VI with a pair of medial tuberosities, tuberosities of tergite VI strongly developed (Fig. 6D). Subgenital plate, in lateral view, 3× longer than wide, lobes diverging since the base, dorsal margin concave (Fig. 6A). Aedeagus with posterior arm lanceolate, 2× longer than anterior arm and strongly inclined forwards; anterior face of posterior arm armed at apical1/3 with small dorsal apical denticles, gonopore subapically (Fig. 6C). Styles distally recurved, apically truncate with anterior part longer than posterior part, spine tuft on dorsal margin just anterior to apex (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6. 

Abdomen and terminalia of Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. A undissected male pygofer in lateral view B styles in dorsal view C aedeagus in lateral view D undissected female abdomen in lateral view E gonoplac in lateral view F first valvula in lateral view G second valvula in lateral view H close-up apex of second valvula. Scale bars: 0.1 (A, H); 0.05 (B, C); 1 mm (D); 0.2 mm (E–G).

Female paratype (ZSFQ-i8423): Similar to male except for the pronotal projection more angulated and produced, central carina reddish behind humeral angles and forewings with amber patch extended from the second to fifth apical cells and limbus around this area. Genitalia. Gonoplac ventrally setose and more sclerotized than dorsally (Fig. 6E). First valvula blade shaped, basal 2/3 broad, apex acuminate (Fig. 6F). Second valvulae blade shaped with two dorsal tubercles in apical 1/2 (Fig. 6G, H).

Nymph unknown.

Variation

Measurements. Female / male (mm): Length from head to wings: 5.7–5.9 / 5.3–5.5; Total length: 5.9–6.4 / 5.4–5.7; Head to apex of posterior process: 5–5.6 / 4.3–4.5; Pronotal length: 4.9–5.5 / 4.5–4.6; Head to horn apex: 1.6–1.9 / 1.5–1.8; Forewing length: 5–5.4 / 4.4–4.8; Body width: 2.3–2.7 / 2.1–2.2; Vertex width on ocellar line: 1.2–1.4 / 1.1–1.2; Head length: 1.3–1.5 / 1.0–1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.7–0.9 / 0.7–0.8; Frontoclypeus width: 0.8–1.0 / 0.7–0.9; Metathoracic tibia length: 1–1.2 / 0.9–1.1; Prothoracic tibial length: 1.5–1.9 / 1.8–1.9; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.3–0.4 / 0.3–0.3; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.2–0.4 / 0.2–0.3.

Females are longer and have more produced pronotal projections than males (Fig. 7A, C), three or four accessory carinae (Fig. 7D), lateral carina behind humeral angles reddish rather than just the posterior apex of pronotum, and the amber membrane is most extended (Fig. 7B). Independent of gender, some accessory carinae are bifurcate or converged.

Figure 7. 

Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. paratype female A–C habitus in frontal, dorsal view, and lateral views respectively D approach to base of horn in lateral view, the white arrows indicate the accessory carinae. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 2 mm (B, C).

Distribution and natural history

This species is distributed in the Montane forests of northwest Ecuadorian Andes (Fig. 9), between 1300 to 2300 m elevation. It inhabits the borders of secondary forests (Fig. 8B) and is a solitary species. The species has been recorded perched on the leaves or stems of different species of Asteraceae and Araceae, but more oftenly on Munnozia pinnatipartita (Hieron.) H.Rob. & Brettell (Asteraceae) (Fig. 8A), an endemic Ecuadorian species (Barriga et al. 2011). The species has been observed active during the day and attracted to mercury light traps at night between 8 pm and 2 am (Fig. 8C).

Figure 8. 

Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. in its natural environment and habitat A paratype female from Mindo by David Torres B border of a secondary forest at Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station C female paratype attracted by a light trap.

Figure 9. 

Distribution of the new species in Ecuador. Red stars = records of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov.; blue stars = records of Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov.

Etymology

The species, a noun in apposition, is named after the Andean Choco Biosphere Reserve declared by UNESCO as the seventh biosphere reserve of Ecuador, where this species lives. It honors the people who defend this territory from the metal mining that threatens the ecosystems and biodiversity of this important area.

Remarks

Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. belongs to E. andina species group based on the pronotum with a horn or projection shorter than the distance between the humeral angles, the forewing with transparent patches, and the blade-shaped second valvulae. Moreover, some species of this group, such as E. pilosa and E. eurycephala, have dense pubescence, shared with E. chocoandina sp. nov.

Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. differs from Enchenopa loranthacina (Sakakibara & Marques, 2010) by the obtuse projection obliquely directed forwards rather than a horizontally inclined horn and from E. pilosa Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 and E. eurycephala Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 by the head longer than wide instead of as long as wide or wider than long respectively. Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. has a reddish median pronotal carina and amber forewing patches which separate it from E. monoceros (Germar, 1821) and E. luizae (Lencioni-Neto & Sakakibara, 2015) which have the median carina concolorous and forewing patches hyaline. The new species resembles E. andina (Schmidt, 1924) by the black overall coloration with median carina and posterior apex reddish, and the amber forewing apex; however, E. chocoandina sp. nov. does not have a horn instead an obtuse projection, longer and denser pubescence, and three or four weak and irregular accessory carinae instead of two or three. Moreover, the new species is considerably shorter than E. andina and differs in the male and female genitalia.

Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. lacks a distinctive horn; instead, it has an obtuse projection with a rounded apex, resembling species of the E. beebi species group or the males of E. minuta species group (Strümpel and Strümpel 2014). However, E. chocoandina sp. nov. properly does not fit within the E. beebi species group due to the absence of large punctation on the upper portion of the pronotum and dorsum, a short translucent apical patch and yellow tarsi. Neither does it belong to the E. minuta species group due to the absence of sexual dimorphism in pronotal horn shape; in E. chocoandina both females and males lack a horn.

We suggest E. andina and E. chocoandina sp. nov. could be related species by the scarlet median carina and posterior apex only shared in both species. Both inhabit mountain forests of the north Andes of Ecuador however are geographically separated by the Interandean Valley.

Discussion

This study increases the number of valid Enchenopa species worldwide to 58 and 17 species for Ecuador. Furthermore, ten species are currently recognized within the E. biplaga species group and seven in the E. andina species group. Unfortunately, Strümpel and Strümpel (2014) did not provide specific localities from the species recorded in Ecuador; thus, based on Goding (1928), Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. and E. chocoandina sp. nov. could be the only species known from northwestern Ecuador because most species are recorded mainly in the Amazon region and a few in the Interandean Valley and central to southwestern Ecuador. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to understand better the distribution of Enchenopa species within Ecuador and, likely, there are still new species to be discovered.

Strümpel and Strümpel (2014) argued that Enchenopa is not supported by any synapomorphies but, instead a combination of characters, some of which are shared with other Membracini genera, and therefore suggested the genus is likely a paraphyletic group. Previously, Lin et al. (2004) found in their molecular phylogeny of Membracinae that Enchenopa is polyphyletic and even Campylenchia (currently synonymized in Enchenopa) belongs to a different clade together with the genera Kronides Kirkaldy, 1904 and Tylopelta Fowler, 1894. Likewise, species with intermediate characters have been found that cannot be assigned with confidence to any genera until the phylogenetic relationships within the tribe are resolved (Dietrich and McKamey 1995; McKamey 2022).

Because Enchenopa is a phenetic and probably non-monophyletic group, we suggest that the, E. biplaga and E. andina species groups, and likely the rest of the Enchenopa species groups could belong to independent lineages as they exhibit many important morphological differences and future phylogenetic studies might split them into different genera. The pronotum of the E. biplaga species group species is somewhat foliaceous with a dorsal spot and lateral band, and some species (e.g., E. lanceolata, E. longimaculata) even have short lateral carinae, resembling Enchophyllum. In contrast, in the E. andina group, the pronotum is not very compressed and mostly unicolorous with the horn short or reduced to a blunt projection, similar to some species of Leioscyta. The second valvulae of females also are strikingly different between both groups; species of the E. biplaga species group having the second valvule broad with a ventral-apical tooth, also shared with some species of Enchophyllum (Strümpel and Strümpel 2006), while in the E. andina species group, it is blade-shaped with dorsal blunt teeth shared with other Enchenopa species groups. It is likely the horn-shaped anterior process and the metopidial carination that defines Enchenopa could be homoplastic characters since they vary intra and interspecifically within Enchenopa and other Membracini (Richter 1954; Strümpel and Strümpel 2014). Until the phylogenetic relationships are resolved, however, the new species described in this study belong to the current definition of Enchenopa.

Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. inhabits the forest remnants of Santo Domingo, a populous city with extensive areas dedicated to monocultures and livestock around the urban area. This city, within its urban area, harbors small patches of secondary forest, mainly around water bodies, which hold a great diversity of native and endemic insect species. Several studies have shown urban green areas, such as urban forest fragments, to be valuable reservoirs of native arthropod biodiversity and these must be integrated with plans for conservation management (Watts and Larivière 2004; Philpott et al. 2014). Membracids are particularly abundant in this kind of ecosystem because they prefer sun-exposed vegetation (Wood 1993). Thus, we reiterate the importance of urban green areas for the conservation of local biodiversity and even unnamed species.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Laboratory of Terrestrial Zoology and the Museum of Zoology, IBIOTROP Institute, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ (Ecuador) for access to the specimens under their care and the equipment; to Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia and Margarita M. López-García for their valuable comments on the draft; to Emilia Peñaherrera for her help in designing the map; a special acknowledgment to David Torres and Amaru Rubio who collected some paratypes of Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. and shared in-situ photographs; to Genny Rodríguez who helped to collect some specimens of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov., to Ignacio Moreno for the identification of the ant species; to Nelson Miranda for the identification of the host plants; to the administrative and field staff of Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station USFQ, especially, to Juan Manuel Guayasamín, Sofía Carvajal, Daniela Franco, Cristian Calvachi and Dayana Rivera who support us in the fieldwork at the station; and to Camilo Flórez-V and Stuart McKamey for valuable taxonomical suggestions. The specimens were legally collected under the research permits MAAE-ARSFC-2021-1858, MAATE-ARSFC-2023-3348, MAATE-ARSFC-2023-0163, and MAATE-CMARG-2022-0603-ACT-001 issued by the Ministerio del Ambiente, Agua y Transición Ecológica de Ecuador.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

Our work was possible thanks to operative funds assigned to the Laboratory of Terrestrial Zoology, Institute of Tropical Biodiversity of Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; and research funds granted by the Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: MPRR, JLMS. Data curation: MPRR, JLMS. Formal analysis: JLMS, MPRR. Funding acquisition: JLMS, MPRR. Investigation: JLMS, MPRR. Methodology: MPRR, JLMS. Project administration: JLMS. Resources: JLMS, MPRR. Software: MPRR, JLMS. Supervision: MPRR, JLMS. Validation: JLMS, MPRR. Visualization: MPRR, JLMS. Writing - original draft: MPRR, JLMS. Writing - review and editing: MPRR, JLMS.

Author ORCIDs

María P. Rueda-Rodríguez https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8190-7239

Jorge L. Montalvo-Salazar https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1221-0304

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Barriga P, Toasa G, Montufar R, Tye A (2011) Asteraceae. In: León Yánez S, Valencia R, Pitman N, Endara L, Ulloa-Ulloa C, Navarrete H (Eds) Libro Rojo de las Plantas Endémicas del Ecuador. Publicaciones del Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, 139–196.
  • Bartlett CR, Deitz LL, Dmitriev DA, Sanborn AF, Soulier-Perkins A, Wallace MS (2018) The Diversity of the True Hoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha). In: Insect Biodiversity. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 501–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945582.ch19
  • Deitz LL (1975) Classification of the higher categories of the New World treehoppers (Homoptera: Membracidae). North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin 255: 1–177.
  • Dietrich CH, McKamey SH (1995) Two new Neotropical treehopper genera and investigation of the phylogeny of the subfamily Membracinae (Homoptera: Membracidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 97: 1–16. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/54714
  • Fabricius JC (1775) Systema Entomologiae sistens insectorum clases, ordines, species, genera, adjectis synonymis, locis, descriptionibus, observationibus. Officina Libraria Kortii, Flensbvrgi et Lipsiae, 832 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.36510
  • Flórez-V C, Wolff MI, Cardona-Duque J (2015) Contribution to the taxonomy of the family Membracidae Rafinesque (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) in Colombia. Zootaxa 3910: 1–261. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3910.1.1
  • Goding FW (1928) Membracidæ of South America and Antilles, III. Subfamily Membracinæ. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 36: 201–234. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25004260
  • Godoy C, Miranda X, Nishida K (2006) Membrácidos de la América tropical. Treehoppers of tropical America, 1st ed. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBIO), Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica, 352 pp.
  • Hamilton KGA, Cocroft RB (2009) Establishing the identity of existing names in the North American Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). Entomological News 120: 554–565. https://doi.org/10.3157/021.120.0513
  • McKamey SH (2022) Notes on the New World Treehopper genera Membracis Fabricius, Enchenopa Amyot and Serville, and closely related taxa (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Membracinae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 124: 85–97. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.124.1.85
  • McNett GD, Cocroft RB (2008) Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers. Behavioral Ecology 19: 650–656. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn017
  • Philpott SM, Cotton J, Bichier P, Friedrich RL, Moorhead LC, Uno S, Valdez M (2014) Local and landscape drivers of arthropod abundance, richness, and trophic composition in urban habitats. Urban Ecosystems 17: 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0333-0
  • Richter L (1947) Membracidae Colombianae. Revisión de las especies colombianas del género Membracis. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 8: 382–403. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.588
  • Sakakibara AM (1992) Sobre alguns Membracini (Homoptera, Membracidae): notas taxonômicas edescrições de gênero e espécies novos. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 36: 93–100.
  • Say T (1824) Appendix. Part I. Natural History. Zoology. In: Narrative of an expedition to the source of St. Peter’s river, Lake Winnepeek, Lake of the Woods, &c. &c., performed in the year 1823, by the order of the Hon. J. C. Calhoun, secretary of war, under the command of Stephen H. Long, Major U. S. T. E. H. C. Carey & I. Lea, Philadelphia, 253–400. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/48506#page/277/mode/1up
  • Strümpel VH, Strümpel R (2014) Revision der amerikanischen Membracidengattung Enchenopa (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadomorpha: Membracidae) mit Beschreibungen neuer Arten. Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg 17: 1–137.
  • Walker F (1858) 4 Insecta Saundersiana: or, Characters of undescribed insects in the collection of William Wilson Saunders. John Van Voorst, London, 117 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5112
login to comment