Research Article |
Corresponding author: María P. Rueda-Rodríguez ( mariapazrr03@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Christopher H. Dietrich
© 2024 María P. Rueda-Rodríguez, Jorge L. Montalvo-Salazar.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Rueda-Rodríguez MP, Montalvo-Salazar JL (2024) Two new species of the treehopper genus Enchenopa Amyot & Serville, 1843 (Hemiptera, Membracidae) from northwest Ecuador. ZooKeys 1216: 43-62. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1216.124181
|
Enchenopa Amyot & Serville, 1843 is a diverse treehopper genus widespread across the New World. We describe two new Enchenopa species from northwest Ecuador: Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. from urban forest remnants at the foothills of the Andes cordillera and Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. from secondary montane forests. Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. is placed in the E. biplaga species group and is distinguished by the sexual dimorphism of the pronotal horn and lateral carina shape, the straight metopidium, 2–4 accessory carinae and the whitish dorsal spot and subapical band. Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. belongs to the E. andina species group and is diagnosed by its reddish central carina and posterior pronotal process apex, presence of an obtuse projection rather than an anterior horn, three or four irregular accessory carinae, and apical amber forewing patch. Illustrations, notes on natural history, and keys to species of the E. biplaga and E. andina species groups are also provided.
Membracinae, Membracini, Tandayapa, taxonomy, Tropical Andes, urban green spaces
Enchenopa Amyot & Serville, 1843 is a diverse New World treehopper genus belonging to Membracinae, the second most specious subfamily of the New World Membracidae (
The biology of most species of Enchenopa is poorly known. Some species are solitary but occasionally congregations of adults with nymphs can be found. There is no parental care; instead, the females deposit their eggs in clusters on their host plant covered with a white wax-like substance that protects them from parasitoids (
Species of Enchenopa are distributed from Canada to Argentina, but most species inhabit the Neotropical region.
In this study, we describe two new species of Enchenopa from northwestern Ecuador, one of which was found in the forest remnants of a populous city at the foothills of the Andean Cordillera, and the second species from secondary montane forests. Additionally, we provide keys to species of the Enchenopa biplaga and E. andina species groups to which the newly described species belong.
Fieldwork was conducted between 2023 and 2024 in two locations in northwest Ecuador, urban forest remnants of Santo Domingo (Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas) composed of patches of secondary semi-deciduous forest and located next to water bodies between 300 and 600 m of elevation, and Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station (Pichincha), a scientific station of Universidad San Francisco de Quito founded in 2022 and located in the Tandayapa Valley at 2280 m of elevation. The station covers 53 hectares of secondary and mature Montane Forest. Specimens were collected opportunistically during the day and euthanized in 75% ethanol. Observations of natural history were recorded in situ. A light trap with a mercury lamp was set up in Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station from 6 pm to 6 m in February 2024, and all membracid specimens were collected. We also examined specimens deposited at the Museo de Zoología Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador (ZSFQ), where all our specimens are deposited.
The specimens were photographed and measured using an Olympus DP73 digital camera attached to the Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with the light diffused as adapted from
Terminology of general morphology follows
1 | Pronotum with one white or yellow dorsal spot | 2 |
– | Pronotum with one white or yellow dorsal spot and one white or yellow subapical band | 3 |
2 | Pronotal horn short, curved forward, dorsal spot always yellow | E. ignidorsum Walker |
– | Pronotal horn long and straight, white or yellow dorsal spot | E. vittifera Stål |
3 | Pronotum with horn length shorter than distance between tips of humeral angles or horn absent | 4 |
– | Pronotum with horn longer than distance between tips of humeral angles | 7 |
4 | Metopidium with two accessory carinae, the posterior one half to almost as long as lateral carina | 5 |
– | Metopidium with two to four accessory carinae, all < 1/2 length of lateral carina | 6 |
5 | Pronotal horn curved forwards; lateral carina just surpassing the corner of humeral angles; posterior accessory carinae almost length of lateral carina. Males / females with dorsal spot 2 × / 4 × as long as subapical band | E. longimaculata Strümpel & Strümpel |
– | Pronotal horn straight; lateral carina almost touching lateral pronotal margin; posterior accessory carinae 1/2 length of lateral carina; dorsal spot and lateral band not sexually dimorphic | E. singularis Strümpel & Strümpel |
6 | Metopidium convex and two to three accessory carinae. Male and female not dimorphic. Overall color brown to black | E. biplaga Walker |
– | Metopidium straight with two to four accessory carinae. Male with narrow horn curved forwards and female with only obtuse projection; male shorter than female. Overall color black | E. gennyae sp. nov. |
7 | Pronotum with horn curved, directed forward | 8 |
– | Pronotum with horn straight | 9 |
8 | Length from pronotum base to horn apex equal to distance from pronotum base to posterior apex of pronotum | E. dubia (Fowler) |
– | Length from pronotum base to horn apex shorter than distance from pronotum base to posterior apex of pronotum | E. lanceolata Fabricius |
9 | Pronotum with horn distinctly longer than body width, lateral carina just surpassing horn base | E. reticornuta Strümpel & Strümpel |
– | Pronotum with horn slightly longer than body width, lateral carina almost touching lateral pronotum margin | E. richteri Strümpel & Strümpel |
Holotype : Ecuador • 1 ♀; Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Santo Domingo, Río Baba -0.30295, -79.15211, 480 m; 12 May 2023; Montalvo, J. & Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Manual ZSFQ-i12112. Paratypes: Ecuador • 2 ♂; same labels as for holotype; ZSFQ-i12110, ZSFQ-i12111 • 2 ♀, 1 ♂ Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Santo Domingo, Quebrada del Río Pove -0.25237, -79.156668, 570 m; 14 Aug. 2023; Rueda, M. P. & Montalvo, J. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i17766:17768 • 3 ♀, 1 ♂ same locality as paratypes; 20 Apr. 2024; Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i18855:18858.
All specimens are minuten-mounted. Dissected abdomens of the holotype and two female and two male paratypes were placed in vials with glycerol pinned beneath the specimens. Some paratypes are in poor condition, with legs or wings lost.
Ecuador • 3 5th instars; same data as paratypes; ZSFQ-i17925, 17926.
Overall color black with whitish dorsal spot and subapical band; metopidium straight, two to four sub-equal accessory carinae. Sexually dimorphic: female with obtuse projection instead of horn, short lateral carina not surpassing humeral angles, dorsal spot 2× longer than subapical band, and longer than male in size; male with narrow horn slightly curved forwards, lateral carinae almost touching lateral margin of pronotum and dorsal spot subequal in length to subapical band.
Female holotype (ZSFQ-i12112). Measurements (mm): Length from head to wings at rest: 5.7; Total length: 6.3; Head to apex of posterior process: 4.6; Pronotal length: 4.4; Head to horn apex: 2.4; Forewing length: 4.9; Body width: 1.9; Vertex width on ocellar line: 1; Head length: 1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.8; Frontoclypeus width: 0.7; Prothoracic tibia length: 0.9; Metathoracic tibia length: 1.4; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.3; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.3.
Color. Overall black with whitish dorsal spot and subapical band on dorsum. Dorsal spot 2× longer than subapical band. Eyes black with dark brown margins, ocelli golden. Forewings opaque dull black, hind wings hyaline, veins black. Tarsi golden.
Surface. Head, pronotum, ventral sclerites of thorax, legs, and abdomen with dense golden pubescence; subcostal cell and veins of forewings with short, dispersed, almost indistinguishable golden pubescence. Pronotum (except metopidium) strongly punctured. Head, metopidium, forewings, and legs rough.
Head. Triangular, longer than wide (avoiding eyes); ocelli closer to eyes than each other; supra-antennal ledges arranged above clypeus; clypeus broad, longer than wide, anterior margin rounded; rostrum reaching hind coxae (Fig.
Thorax. Pronotum somewhat compressed, in lateral view, triangular, dorsal contour arched; metopidium straight, inclined anteriorly; horn reduced to an obtuse projection, obliquely directed dorso-anteriorly, wider than long, apex broadly rounded; median carina laminated and somewhat foliaceous, especially on dorsum; lateral carina short, not extending beyond humeral angles (Fig.
Abdomen. Sternum III with a transverse keel extending along the sternite and slightly projected ventrally. Dorsum of tergites VII and VIII with medial tuberosities, tergites IV–VI with reduced medial tuberosities (Fig.
Abdomen and terminalia of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. A undissected female abdomen in lateral view B gonoplac in lateral view C first valvula in lateral view D second valvula in lateral view E close-up apex of second valvula F undissected male pygofer in lateral view G styles in dorsal view H aedeagus in lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 0.1 mm (B–D); 0.01 mm (E); 0.2 mm (F); 0.05 mm (G, H).
Male paratype (ZSFQi-17766). Similar to female except dorsal spot as long as subapical band, pronotal horn narrow and curved forwards, lateral carina almost touching lateral margin of pronotum, metopidium with three accessory carinae at each side. Genitalia. Subgenital plate, in lateral view, 3× longer than wide, lobes diverging in first 1/4, dorsal margin concave, distally expanded (Fig.
Measurements. Male / Female (mm): Length from head to wings: 4.4–5.1 / 5.3–5.8; Total length: 4.9–5.6 / 6.2–6.3; Head to apex of posterior process: 3.8–4.5 / 4.58–5; Pronotal length: 3.8–5.5 / 4.4–5.3; Head to horn apex: 2.2–2.7 / 2.4–2.9; Forewing length: 3.7–4.2 / 4.5–5.1; Body width: 1.6–1.7 / 1.9–2; Vertex width on ocellar line: 0.9–1 / 1.0–1.1; Head length: 1.1–1.2 / 1–1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.7–0.8 / 0.7–0.8; Frontolypeus width: 0.7 / 0.7–0.8; Metathoracic tibia length: 0.8–1 / 0.9–1; Prothoracic tibia length: 1.2–1.4 / 1.4–1.8; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.2–0.3 / 0.3–0.5; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.3–0.4 / 0.3.
Females longer than males, with obtuse projection instead of horn, dorsal spot 2× longer than subapical band, lateral carina not surpassing humeral angles and, in some individuals, weakly produced; two to four secondary carinae almost as long as lateral carina. Male with horn narrow and curved forwards, dorsal spot < 2× subapical band length (Fig.
Overall color mostly white with black tarsi and scoli (Fig.
Specimens of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. were found in two secondary forest remnants of the Western Foothills Forest from the urban area of Santo Domingo (Fig.
The species is dedicated to the mother of the first author, Genny Elizabeth Rodríguez Cueva, who helped to find the specimens of this species and has been a great support and inspiration throughout her life.
Females of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. have a short lateral carina that does not extend beyond the humeral angles, while males have a long lateral carina that almost reaches the lateral margin of pronotum. In the tribe Membracini, the length of the lateral carina has not been previously reported as sexually dimorphic in any species. However, in some species of Membracis, it has been noted that the lateral carina may or may not be present among individuals (
Sexual dimorphism in the shape of the pronotal horn is characteristic of the Enchenopa minuta species group. However, Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. does not belong to that group, given its coloration, the shape of the second valvula and, more importantly, the female’s lack of a pronotal horn; in the E. minuta species group, males lack the horn and females generally have a developed horn.
Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. belongs to the E. biplaga species group due to the presence of bands on dorsum of the pronotum, the second valvula with a ventral apical tooth, and forewings with one discoidal cell. Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. differs from E. ignidorsum (Walker, 1858) and E. vittifera (Stål, 1869) by the two white lateral bands instead of just one yellow or white one, respectively. Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. differs from E. dubia (Fowler, 1894), E. lanceolata, E. reticornuta Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014, and E. richteri Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 by a horn shorter than the distance between the tips of humeral angles rather than longer. Enchenopa singularis Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 and E. longimaculata have two accessory carinae with the posterior one ~ 1/2 or almost the total length, respectively, of the lateral carina, while E. gennyae sp. nov. has from two to four somewhat subequal accessory carinae. E. gennyae sp. nov. is distinguished from E. melaleuca Walker, 1858 by the shorter horn that is not curved forward. The new species closely resembles Enchenopa biplaga Walker, 1858 due to the shape of the pronotal horn, pronotum coloration, and the disposition of the accessory carinae. However, Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. has a straight metopidium, less produced horn, and sexual dimorphism. In contrast, in E. biplaga the metopidium is convex, the horn is large and strongly produced, and without sexual dimorphism. The females of E. gennyae sp. nov. have a short and straight horn while E. biplaga females have the horn longer than wide and curved forward. In males of E. gennyae sp. nov. the posterior arm of the aedeagus, in lateral view, is abruptly narrowed at one-third of its length, and the apical hook of the styles has the posterior tooth longer and narrower than the anterior tooth. In contrast, in the male of E. biplaga the width of the posterior arm of the aedeagus, in lateral view, slightly decreases at half of its length, and the apical hook of the styles has the posterior tooth similar in size to the anterior tooth.
In the E. biplaga species group, nymphs of E. reticornuta and E. vittifera are known (
1 | Pronotal horn horizontally directed forwards | E. loranthacina Sakakibara & Marques |
– | Pronotal horn obliquely directed upwards and forwards or horn absent and replaced by an obtuse projection | 2 |
2 | Head as long as wide or wider than long | 3 |
– | Head longer than wide | 4 |
3 | Head as long as wide, body with long pubescence, forewings with a medial pale patch | E. pilosa Strümpel & Strümpel |
– | Head wider than long, body with short pubescence, forewings without a medial pale patch | E. eurycephala Strümpel & Strümpel |
4 | Median carina or just posterior apex of pronotum reddish, apical 1/3 of forewings amber | 5 |
– | Median carina and posterior apex of pronotum concolorous, forewing with hyaline patch at apical margin | 6 |
5 | Pronotal horn well produced; two to three accessory carinae well developed | E. andina Schmidt |
– | Pronotal horn absent, replaced by obtuse projection; three to four weak and irregular accessory carinae present, some touching lateral carina | E. chocoandina sp. nov. |
6 | Pronotal accessory carinae well developed; forewing apical patch occupying all of distal margin and extended basad to middle of apical cells 3 and 4 | E. monoceros (Germar) |
– | Pronotum with accessory carinae weak; forewing apical patch small, occupying only part of limbus | E. luizae Lencioni-Neto & Sakakibara |
Holotype : Ecuador • 1 ♂; Pichincha, Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station -0.009645, -78.688058, 2280 m of elevation; 3 Fbr. 2024; Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i18060. Paratypes: Ecuador • 1 ♂; same data as for holotype; ZSFQ-i18061 • 3 ♀, 1 ♂; Pichincha, Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station -0.009645, -78.688058, 2280 m of elevation; 9 Fbr. 2024; López-García, M. M., Montalvo, J. & Rueda, M. P. leg.; Ex. Mercury light; ZSFQ-i10862: 10865 • 1 ♀; Pichincha, Mindo, 0.04166, -78.77472, 1300 m of elevation; 11 Jun. 2022; Torres, D. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i8423 • 1 ♀, Imbabura, Seis de Julio de Cuellaje, 0.4509352, -78.525948, 2000 m of elevation; 13 Nov. 2021; Rubio, A. leg.; Ex. Manual; ZSFQ-i8196.
Holotype and most paratypes are minuten-mounted. The paratype female ZSFQ-i8243 was originally pinned, but later the specimen was transferred to double mounting on a minuten pin. Dissected abdomens of holotype, one male paratype, and three female specimens placed in vials with glycerol pinned with specimens.
Overall coloration black with scarlet median carina and posterior apex in females and scarlet posterior apex in males, apical 1/3 of forewing amber; pronotal horn absent, replaced by obtuse projection directed obliquely forwards, lateral carina almost touching lateral margin of pronotum; three or four weak accessory carinae, some touching lateral carinae or bifurcate.
Male holotype (ZSFQ-i10860): Measurements (mm): Length from head to wings: 5.3; Total length: 5.4; Head to apex of posterior process: 4.5; Pronotal length: 4.6; Head to horn apex: 1.5; Forewing length: 4.4; Body width: 2.2; Vertex width on ocellar line: 1.2; Head length: 1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.7; Frontoclypeus width: 0.1; Metathoracic tibia length: 0.9; Prothoracic tibia length: 1.8; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.3; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.2.
Color. Overall color black. Eyes brownish, ocelli golden. Posterior apex of pronotum scarlet red. Forewings almost entirely opaque black with an apical translucent amber patch restricted on the third to fifth apical cells and limbus around this area. Tarsi pale brownish.
Surface. Head, pronotum, ventral sclerites of thorax, legs, and abdomen with golden pubescence (Fig.
Head. Triangular blunt, longer than wide (excluding eyes); distance between ocelli subequal to ocelli-eye distance; supra-antennal ledges arranged above clypeus; clypeus broad, longer than wide, anterior margin rounded; rostrum reaching posterior coxae (Fig.
Thorax. Pronotum, in lateral view, triangular; metopidium straight directed forwards; pronotal horn absent instead an obtuse projection with rounded apex; humeral angles slightly produced (Fig.
Abdomen. Sternum III with a transversal keel extended along the sternite, strongly projected downwards and medially invaginated. Tergites III to VI with a pair of medial tuberosities, tuberosities of tergite VI strongly developed (Fig.
Abdomen and terminalia of Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. A undissected male pygofer in lateral view B styles in dorsal view C aedeagus in lateral view D undissected female abdomen in lateral view E gonoplac in lateral view F first valvula in lateral view G second valvula in lateral view H close-up apex of second valvula. Scale bars: 0.1 (A, H); 0.05 (B, C); 1 mm (D); 0.2 mm (E–G).
Female paratype (ZSFQ-i8423): Similar to male except for the pronotal projection more angulated and produced, central carina reddish behind humeral angles and forewings with amber patch extended from the second to fifth apical cells and limbus around this area. Genitalia. Gonoplac ventrally setose and more sclerotized than dorsally (Fig.
Nymph unknown.
Measurements. Female / male (mm): Length from head to wings: 5.7–5.9 / 5.3–5.5; Total length: 5.9–6.4 / 5.4–5.7; Head to apex of posterior process: 5–5.6 / 4.3–4.5; Pronotal length: 4.9–5.5 / 4.5–4.6; Head to horn apex: 1.6–1.9 / 1.5–1.8; Forewing length: 5–5.4 / 4.4–4.8; Body width: 2.3–2.7 / 2.1–2.2; Vertex width on ocellar line: 1.2–1.4 / 1.1–1.2; Head length: 1.3–1.5 / 1.0–1.2; Frontoclypeus length: 0.7–0.9 / 0.7–0.8; Frontoclypeus width: 0.8–1.0 / 0.7–0.9; Metathoracic tibia length: 1–1.2 / 0.9–1.1; Prothoracic tibial length: 1.5–1.9 / 1.8–1.9; Metathoracic tibia width: 0.3–0.4 / 0.3–0.3; Prothoracic tibia width: 0.2–0.4 / 0.2–0.3.
Females are longer and have more produced pronotal projections than males (Fig.
This species is distributed in the Montane forests of northwest Ecuadorian Andes (Fig.
The species, a noun in apposition, is named after the Andean Choco Biosphere Reserve declared by UNESCO as the seventh biosphere reserve of Ecuador, where this species lives. It honors the people who defend this territory from the metal mining that threatens the ecosystems and biodiversity of this important area.
Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. belongs to E. andina species group based on the pronotum with a horn or projection shorter than the distance between the humeral angles, the forewing with transparent patches, and the blade-shaped second valvulae. Moreover, some species of this group, such as E. pilosa and E. eurycephala, have dense pubescence, shared with E. chocoandina sp. nov.
Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. differs from Enchenopa loranthacina (Sakakibara & Marques, 2010) by the obtuse projection obliquely directed forwards rather than a horizontally inclined horn and from E. pilosa Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 and E. eurycephala Strümpel & Strümpel, 2014 by the head longer than wide instead of as long as wide or wider than long respectively. Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. has a reddish median pronotal carina and amber forewing patches which separate it from E. monoceros (Germar, 1821) and E. luizae (Lencioni-Neto & Sakakibara, 2015) which have the median carina concolorous and forewing patches hyaline. The new species resembles E. andina (Schmidt, 1924) by the black overall coloration with median carina and posterior apex reddish, and the amber forewing apex; however, E. chocoandina sp. nov. does not have a horn instead an obtuse projection, longer and denser pubescence, and three or four weak and irregular accessory carinae instead of two or three. Moreover, the new species is considerably shorter than E. andina and differs in the male and female genitalia.
Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. lacks a distinctive horn; instead, it has an obtuse projection with a rounded apex, resembling species of the E. beebi species group or the males of E. minuta species group (
We suggest E. andina and E. chocoandina sp. nov. could be related species by the scarlet median carina and posterior apex only shared in both species. Both inhabit mountain forests of the north Andes of Ecuador however are geographically separated by the Interandean Valley.
This study increases the number of valid Enchenopa species worldwide to 58 and 17 species for Ecuador. Furthermore, ten species are currently recognized within the E. biplaga species group and seven in the E. andina species group. Unfortunately,
Because Enchenopa is a phenetic and probably non-monophyletic group, we suggest that the, E. biplaga and E. andina species groups, and likely the rest of the Enchenopa species groups could belong to independent lineages as they exhibit many important morphological differences and future phylogenetic studies might split them into different genera. The pronotum of the E. biplaga species group species is somewhat foliaceous with a dorsal spot and lateral band, and some species (e.g., E. lanceolata, E. longimaculata) even have short lateral carinae, resembling Enchophyllum. In contrast, in the E. andina group, the pronotum is not very compressed and mostly unicolorous with the horn short or reduced to a blunt projection, similar to some species of Leioscyta. The second valvulae of females also are strikingly different between both groups; species of the E. biplaga species group having the second valvule broad with a ventral-apical tooth, also shared with some species of Enchophyllum (
Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov. inhabits the forest remnants of Santo Domingo, a populous city with extensive areas dedicated to monocultures and livestock around the urban area. This city, within its urban area, harbors small patches of secondary forest, mainly around water bodies, which hold a great diversity of native and endemic insect species. Several studies have shown urban green areas, such as urban forest fragments, to be valuable reservoirs of native arthropod biodiversity and these must be integrated with plans for conservation management (
We thank the Laboratory of Terrestrial Zoology and the Museum of Zoology, IBIOTROP Institute, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ (Ecuador) for access to the specimens under their care and the equipment; to Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia and Margarita M. López-García for their valuable comments on the draft; to Emilia Peñaherrera for her help in designing the map; a special acknowledgment to David Torres and Amaru Rubio who collected some paratypes of Enchenopa chocoandina sp. nov. and shared in-situ photographs; to Genny Rodríguez who helped to collect some specimens of Enchenopa gennyae sp. nov., to Ignacio Moreno for the identification of the ant species; to Nelson Miranda for the identification of the host plants; to the administrative and field staff of Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station USFQ, especially, to Juan Manuel Guayasamín, Sofía Carvajal, Daniela Franco, Cristian Calvachi and Dayana Rivera who support us in the fieldwork at the station; and to Camilo Flórez-V and Stuart McKamey for valuable taxonomical suggestions. The specimens were legally collected under the research permits MAAE-ARSFC-2021-1858, MAATE-ARSFC-2023-3348, MAATE-ARSFC-2023-0163, and MAATE-CMARG-2022-0603-ACT-001 issued by the Ministerio del Ambiente, Agua y Transición Ecológica de Ecuador.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
Our work was possible thanks to operative funds assigned to the Laboratory of Terrestrial Zoology, Institute of Tropical Biodiversity of Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; and research funds granted by the Tandayapa Cloud Forest Station.
Conceptualization: MPRR, JLMS. Data curation: MPRR, JLMS. Formal analysis: JLMS, MPRR. Funding acquisition: JLMS, MPRR. Investigation: JLMS, MPRR. Methodology: MPRR, JLMS. Project administration: JLMS. Resources: JLMS, MPRR. Software: MPRR, JLMS. Supervision: MPRR, JLMS. Validation: JLMS, MPRR. Visualization: MPRR, JLMS. Writing - original draft: MPRR, JLMS. Writing - review and editing: MPRR, JLMS.
María P. Rueda-Rodríguez https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8190-7239
Jorge L. Montalvo-Salazar https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1221-0304
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.