Research Article
Print
Research Article
Four complete mitochondrial genomes of the subgenus Pterelachisus (Diptera, Tipulidae, Tipula) and implications for the higher phylogeny of the family Tipulidae
expand article infoYuetian Gao, Wanxin Cai§, Yupeng Li§, Yan Li§, Ding Yang
‡ China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
§ Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China
Open Access

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genomes of Tipula (Pterelachisus) cinereocincta mesacantha Alexander, 1934, T. (P.) legalis Alexander, 1933, T. (P.) varipennis Meigen, 1818, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana Alexander, 1954 are reported, three of them being sequenced for the first time. The mitochondrial genome lengths of the four species are 15,907 bp, 15,625 bp, 15,772 bp, and 15,735 bp, respectively. All genomes exhibit a high AT base composition, with A + T content of 76.7%, 75.0%, 77.8%, and 75.4%, respectively. The newly reported mitogenomes herein show a general similarity in overall structure, gene order, base composition, and nucleotide content to those of the previously studied species within the family Tipulidae. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted to investigate the relationships within Tipulidae, using both Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference approaches. The results show that the four target species of the subgenus T. (Pterelachisus) basically form a monophyletic group within Tipulidae, clustering with species of the Tipula subgenera T. (Lunatipula), T. (Vestiplex), and T. (Formotipula); however, the genus Tipula is not monophyletic. Moreover, neither the tipulid subfamily Tipulinae nor the family Limoniidae is supported to be a monophyletic group. The monophyly of the family Tipulidae, and the sister relationship between Tipulidae and Cylindrotomidae are reconfirmed. These research findings could contribute to deep insights into the systematic and evolutionary patterns of crane flies.

Key words

Comparative mitogenome, crane fly, phylogenetic analysis, Tipulinae

Introduction

The subgenus Pterelachisus Rondani, 1842, comprising approximately 200 species in the world, is one of the most speciose subgenera of the genus Tipula Linnaeus, 1758 belonging to Tipulidae, Tipuloidea, Diptera (Oosterbroek 2024). Tipula (Pterelachisus) is widely distributed in the Northern Hemisphere, primarily including the Palaearctic, Nearctic, and Oriental regions (Oosterbroek 2024). The adults of T. (Pterelachisus) are mostly medium- to large-sized, often gray, yellow, or brown, with pruinescence on the body, usually three or four darker stripes present on the prescutum of mesothorax, and more or less conspicuous grayish or brownish markings on the wing. The larvae of T. (Pterelachisus) are believed to be detritivores or herbivores, commonly inhabit forests within humus-rich soil, decaying wood, or beneath moss on dead wood or rock (Brindle 1960; Alexander 2002; Polevoi and Pilipenko 2016; Kramer and Langlois 2019; Gorban and Podeniene 2022; Cai et al. 2023).

Though some revision work on the taxonomy of T. (Pterelachisus) had been done (Savchenko 1964; Alexander 1965; Theowald 1980; Salmela 2009; Pilipenko 2009), it was still difficult to define this subgenus. Due many similarities in both adults and larvae, the boundaries between T. (Pterelachisus) and T. (Vestiplex), T. (Lunatipula), and some other related subgenera of Tipula, are frequently confused, which make them loosely termed the “Vestiplex-Lunatipula” group of subgenera (Gelhaus 1986; 2005). Up to now, only a little phylogenetic work on the relationship within the group had been done based on morphological data (Savchenko 1979; Gelhaus 2005). However, questions about the monophyly and the delimitation of T. (Pterelachisus), as well as the evolutionary relationships between T. (Pterelachisus) and other subgenera remain unsolved.

Mitochondrial genomes typically exhibit a circular structure, with a size ranging from 15 to 18 kb, comprising multiple segments, including 13 protein-coding genes, two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. The cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene has been widely employed as a barcoding marker for species identification (Hebert et al. 2003; Pilipenko et al. 2012; Men et al. 2017; Sharkey et al. 2021). Due to their relatively easy accessibility, stable gene content, relatively conserved gene arrangement, maternal inheritance, and infrequent recombination, mitochondrial genomes have shown significant value in resolving insect taxonomic study and reconstructing phylogenetic relationships over the past few decades (Wilson et al. 1985; Wei and Chen 2011; Cameron 2014). With the advancement of gene sequencing technology, mitochondrial genomes have been frequently used for insect systematic and evolutionary studies, not only at higher taxonomic levels (Timmermans and Vogler 2012; Li et al. 2017; Ding et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019c; Lorenz et al. 2021; Lin et al. 2022a, 2022b; Song et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023), but also on inter- or infraspecific groups (Du et al. 2019; 2021). Nevertheless, there has not been much research on crane flies in this area. Beckenbach (2012) was among the pioneers in releasing partial mitochondrial genomes of Tipulidae and using them to delineate phylogenetic relationships within the crane fly infraorder Tipulomorpha. Subsequently, Zhang et al. (2016) and Kang et al. (2023) used complete mitochondrial genomes to explore phylogenetic relationships within Tipulomorpha.

Before this study, only one species of T. (Pterelachisus), T. (P.) varipennis Meigen, 1818, had a partial mitogenome obtained from the whole-genome sequencing data (SRR1469981), which was updated into the NCBI database by Leerhoei in 2020 with the accession number MT410829. In this study, another three species of Pterelachisus, including T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha Alexander, 1934, T. (P.) legalis Alexander, 1933 and T. (P.) yasumatsuana Alexander, 1954 were sequenced by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology. All complete mitochondrial genomes of the above four species were assembled and annotated. Nucleotide composition, codon use, transfer RNA secondary structure, evolutionary patterns among PCGs (protein-coding genes), and structural elements in the control region were analyzed. Based on these data, plus some previous mitogenomic data of other species, the phylogeny of Tipuloidea was reconstructed using both Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood analysis (ML).

Materials and methods

Sampling, DNA extraction, and sequencing

All the specimens of the three species sequenced in this study were collected and identified by authors and the collecting information is summarized in Suppl. material 1. After collection, each specimen was immediately preserved in 95% ethanol, and later stored at -20 °C in the laboratory. The voucher specimen of T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha was deposited in the Entomological Museum of Shenyang Agricultural University (SYAU), while those of T. (P.) legalis and T. (P.) yasumatsuana were deposited in the Entomological Museum of China Agricultural University (CAU). Genomic DNA was extracted from the thoracic tissue of each specimen using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The DNA concentration was quantified using an Agilent 5400 instrument.

For DNA library preparation, the NEB Next® Ultra™ DNA Library Prep Kit was utilized, and paired-end sequencing was conducted on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, generating raw data with an insert size of 350 bp and a read length of 150 bp. Approximately 4 Gb of raw sequenced data was obtained. Novogene Biotechnology Company (Beijing, China) conducted the aforementioned processes. The paired raw reads for the whole mitogenome of T. (P.) varipennis was downloaded from NCBI under the accession number SRR11469981.

Mitochondrial genomes assembly, annotation, and analysis

The mitochondrial genomes of all species were assembled using IDBA-UD 1.1.3 (Peng et al. 2012), and circularization of resulting linear contigs was verified using the python script in MitoZ 2.3 software (Meng et al. 2019). Circular mitochondrial genomes were then submitted to the MITOS2 web service (Bernt et al. 2013) for annotation. The secondary structure of tRNA was determined using both the MITOS2 web service (Bernt et al. 2013) and the tRNAscan-SE 2.0 (Lowe and Chan 2016) web service. Annotated mitochondrial genomes underwent a comparative analysis with closely related species in Geneious 9.0.2, and manual corrections were applied. Subsequent analyses were conducted after error exclusion.

Gene maps of the mitochondrial genomes sequenced of four T. (Pterelachisus) species were generated using the Proksee web service (Grant et al. 2023). Basal composition and amino acid usage were calculated using PhyloSuite 1.2.3 (Zhang et al. 2020), with AT skew defined as [A – T] / [A + T] and GC skew defined as [G – C] / [G + C] (Perna and Kocher 1995). Ka and Ks values, along with nucleotide diversity (Pi), were obtained using DnaSP 6.12.03 (Rozas et al. 2017). Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) data were also acquired through PhyloSuite (Zhang et al. 2020), and Rscript was employed for graphical representation. Repeat segments in the control region (CR) were identified using the Tandem Repeats Finder 4.09 (Benson 1999).

Accurately annotated mitochondrial genomes, along with sequencing data, were deposited in the NCBI database under the BioProject PRJNA1067446.

Phylogenetic analysis

A total of 31 complete mitochondrial genomes were used for phylogenetic analysis in this study (Table 1). Trichocera bimacula Walker, 1848 and Paracladura trichoptera (Osten Sacken, 1877), members of the family Trichoceridae, were designated as outgroups, serving as the root of the phylogenetic tree. Twenty-nine species within four families of Tipuloidea were contained in the ingroups, which respectively include one species of Pediciidae, ten species within ten genera of Limoniidae, one species of Cylindrotomidae, and 17 species within 12 (sub)genera of Tipulidae. All data preprocessing was carried out using PhyloSuite 1.2.3. Mitochondrial genomes served as the basis for constructing four concatenated datasets: 1) 13PCG, including all three codon positions of 13 PCGs. 2) 13PCG + rRNA, including all three codon positions of 13 PCGs and two Ribosomal RNA genes. 3) 13PCG12, including the first and second codon positions of 13 PCGs. And 4) AA, including all amino acid of 13 PCGs. Prior to concatenation, all data underwent alignment using MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013), followed by manual correction in MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016) to eliminate gap regions. Model selection for optimal models was performed using PartitionFinder 2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2016).

Table 1.

Taxonomic information, GenBank accession numbers, and references of mitochondrial genomes used in the present study.

Family Species GenBank number Reference
Outgroup
Trichoceridae Paracladura trichoptera (Osten Sacken, 1877) NC016173 (Beckenbach 2012)
Trichoceridae Trichocera bimacula Walker, 1848 NC016169 (Beckenbach 2012)
Ingroup
Pediciidae Pedicia sp. KT970062 (Zhang et al. 2016)
Limoniidae Conosia irrorata (Wiedemann, 1828) NC057072 (Zhang et al. 2019a)
Limoniidae Dicranomyia modesta (Meigen, 1818) MT628560 Direct submission
Limoniidae Epiphragma mediale Mao & Yang, 2009 NC057085 (Zhang et al. 2021)
Limoniidae Euphylidorea dispar (Meigen, 1818) MT410841 Direct submission
Limoniidae Limonia phragmitidis (Schrank, 1781) NC044484 (Ren et al. 2019c)
Limoniidae Metalimnobia quadrinotata (Meigen, 1818) MT584154 Direct submission
Limoniidae Paradelphomyia sp. KT970061 (Zhang et al. 2016)
Limoniidae Pseudolimnophila brunneinota Alexander, 1933 MN398932 (Ren et al. 2019a)
Limoniidae Rhipidia chenwenyoungi Zhang, Li &Yang, 2012 KT970063 (Zhang et al. 2016)
Limoniidae Symplecta hybrida (Meigen, 1804) NC030519 (Zhang et al. 2016)
Cylindrotomidae Cylindrotoma sp. KT970060 (Zhang et al. 2016)
Tipuloidea Nephrotoma flavescens (Linnaeus, 1758) MT628586 Direct submission
Tipuloidea Nephrotoma quadrifaria (Meigen, 1804) MT872674 Direct submission
Tipuloidea Nephrotoma tenuipes (Riedel, 1910) MN053900 (Ren et al. 2019b)
Tipuloidea Nigrotipula nigra (Linnaeus, 1758) MT483653 Direct submission
Tipuloidea Tanyptera hebeiensis Yang &Yang, 1988 NC053795 (Zhao et al. 2021)
Tipuloidea Tipula (Acutipula) cockerelliana Alexander, 1925 NC030520 (Zhang et al. 2016)
Tipuloidea Tipula (Dendrotipula) flavolineata Meigen, 1804 MT410828 Direct submission
Tipuloidea Tipula (Formotipula) melanomera gracilispina Savchenko, 1960 MK864102 (Zhang et al. 2019b)
Tipuloidea Tipula (Lunatipula) fascipennis Meigen, 1818 NC050319 Direct submission
Tipuloidea Tipula (Nippotipula) abdominalis (Say, 1823) JN861743 (Beckenbach 2012)
Tipuloidea Tipula (Pterelachisus) legalis Alexander, 1933 PP209204 This study
Tipuloidea Tipula (Pterelachisus) cinereocincta mesacantha Alexander, 1934 PP209203 This study
Tipuloidea Tipula (Pterelachisus) varipennis Meigen, 1818 PP209205 This study
Tipuloidea Tipula (Pterelachisus) yasumatsuana Alexander, 1954 PP209206 This study
Tipuloidea Tipula (Tipula) paludosa Meigen, 1830 MT483696 Direct submission
Tipuloidea Tipula (Vestiplex) aestiva Savchenko, 1960 NC063751 (Gao et al. 2023)
Tipuloidea Tipula (Yamatotipula) nova Walker, 1848 NC057055 (Zhao et al. 2019)

AliGROOVE 1.08 (Kück et al. 2014) was used to offer the possibility to exclude taxa or gene partitions. Phylogenetic analysis for Maximum Likelihood (ML) trees utilized RAxML 8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014) with specific parameters set as -m GTRGAMMA -x 1234 -p 12345 -# 1000. Bayesian analysis was conducted using MrBayes 2.3 (Ronquist et al. 2012) for 2,000,000 generations with the default settings. The resulting phylogenetic tree was visualized and enhanced for presentation using Figtree 1.4.4 and Adobe Photoshop 2022.

Result and discussion

Mitogenomic organization and base composition

The complete mitochondrial genomes of all four T. (Pterelachisus) species comprise 13 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNA genes, two ribosomal RNA genes, and one non-coding region (A + T-rich control region) (Table 2; Fig. 1). These genes exhibit a ring structure and the tandem arrangement is consistent with previously published mitochondrial whole genome gene arrangements in species of Tipulidae. The total length of the four mitochondrial genomes ranges from 15,000 to 16,000 base pairs. Specifically, T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, T. (P.) legalis, T. (P.) varipennis, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana have lengths of 15,907 bp, 15,625 bp, 15,772 bp, and 15,735 bp, respectively (Table 3). All mitochondrial genomes are notably AT-rich, with A + T base contents for T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, T. (P.) legalis, T. (P.) varipennis, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana at 76.7%, 75.0%, 77.8%, and 75.4%, respectively (Table 3).

Table 2.

Mitochondrial genome structures of T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha Alexander, 1934, T. (P.) legalis Alexander, 1933, T. (P.) varipennis Meigen, 1818, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana Alexander, 1954.

Gene Strand Position Size Codon Intergenic nucleotides
trnI H 1-67/1-66/1-67/1-67 67/66/67/67
trnQ L 65-133/64-132/65-133/65-133 69/69/69/69 -3/-3/-3/-3
trnM H 134-202/136-204/137-205/134-202 69/69/69/69 0/3/3/0
nad2 H 203-1234/205-1236/206-1237/203-1234 1032/1032/1032/1032 ATT-TAA/ATT-TAA/ATT-TAA/ATT-TAA
trnW H 1245-1313/1248-1316/1236-1304/1233-1301 69/69/69/69 10/11/-2/-2
trnC L 1306-1367/1309-1370/1297-1359/1294-1355 62/62/63/62 -8/-8/-8/-8
trnY L 1369-1434/1374-1439/1361-1426/1358-1423 66/66/66/66 1/3/1/2
cox1 H 1433-2968/1438-2973/1425-2960/1422-2957 1536/1536/1536/1536 TCG-TAA/TCG-TAA/TCG-TAA/TCG-TAA -2/-2/-2/-2
trnL2 H 2969-3032/2974-3037/2961-3024/2958-3021 64/64/64/64
cox2 H 3041-3725/3046-3730/3033-3717/3030-3714 685/685/685/685 ATG-T/ATG-T/ATG-T/ATG-T 8/8/8/8
trnK H 3726-3796/3731-3801/3718-3788/3715-3785 71/71/71/71
trnD H 3796-3861/3801-3866/3788-3853/3785-3851 66/66/66/67 -1/-1/-1/-1
atp8 H 3862-4023/3867-4028/3854-4015/3852-4013 162/162/162/162 ATT-TAA/ATT-TAA/ATT-TAA/ATT-TAA
atp6 H 4017-4694/4022-4699/4009-4686/4007-4684 678/678/678/678 ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA -7/-7/-7/-7
cox3 H 4697-5485/4702-5490/4689-5477/4687-5475 789/789/789/789 ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA 2/2/2/2
trnG H 5488-5553/5493-5558/5480-5543/5478-5543 66/66/64/66 2/2/2/2
nad3 H 5554-5907/5559-5912/5544-5895/5544-5897 354/354/352/354 ATT-TAA/ATT-TAG/ATT-T/ATT-TAA
trnA H 5907-5971/5911-5974/5896-5960/5898-5961 65/64/65/64 -1/-2/0/0
trnR H 5971-6033/5974-6038/5960-6023/5961-6023 63/65/64/63 -1/-1/-1/-1
trnN H 6036-6101/6040-6105/6026-6091/6024-6089 66/66/66/66 2/1/2/0
trnS1 H 6102-6168/6106-6172/6092-6158/6090-6156 67/67/67/67
trnE H 6169-6233/6173-6238/6159-6224/6157-6223 65/66/66/67
trnF L 6266-6331/6266-6331/6257-6322/6251-6316 66/66/66/66 32/27/32/27
nad5 L 6332-8063/6332-8063/6323-8054/6317-8048 1732/1732/1732/1732 ATG-T/GTG-T/GTG-T/GTG-T
trnH L 8064-8129/8064-8129/8055-8120/8049-8114 66/66/66/66
nad4 L 8130-9465/8129-9466/8121-9456/8114-9451 1336/1338/1336/1338 ATG-T/ATG-TAA/ATG-T/ATG-TAA 0/-1/0/-1
nad4L L 9459-9755/9460-9756/9450-9746/9445-9741 297/297/297/297 ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA/ATG-TAA -7/-7/-7/-7
trnT H 9758-9823/9759-9823/9749-9815/9744-9808 66/65/67/65 2/2/2/2
trnP L 9824-9889/9824-9887/9816-9880/9809-9873 66/64/65/65
nad6 H 9892-10419/9890-10417/9883-10410/9876-10403 528/528/528/528 ATT-TAA/ATT-TAA/ATC-TAA/ATT-TAA 2/2/2/2
cytb H 10419-11555/10417-11553/10410-11546/10403-11539 1137/1137/1137/1137 ATG-TAG/ATG-TAG/ATG-TAG/ATG-TAG -1/-1/-1/-1
trnS2 H 11554-11621/11552-11619/11545-11612/11538-11605 68/68/68/68 -2/-2/-2/-2
nad1 L 11638-12579/11636-12577/11629-12570/11622-12563 942/942/942/942 ATA-TAA/ATG-TAA/ATA-TAA/ATG-TAA 16/16/16/16
trnL1 L 12584-12647/12582-12645/12575-12638/12568-12631 64/64/64/64 4/4/4/4
rrnL L 12648-13966/12646-13966/12639-13961/12632-13954 1319/1321/1323/1323
trnV L 13967-14038/13967-14038/13962-14033/13955-14026 72/72/72/72
rrnS L 14039-14821/14039-14820/14034-14815/14027-14809 783/782/782/783
control region 14822-15907/14821-15625/14816-15772/14810-15735 1086/805/957/926
Table 3.

Nucleotide composition of mitochondrial genomes of the four T. (Pterelachisus) species.

Species Regions Length (bp) T% C% A% G% A+T% AT Skew GC Skew
T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha Whole genome 15907 38.1 14.2 38.6 9.2 76.7 0.006 -0.214
PCGs 11205 43.0 12.3 31.6 13.1 74.6 -0.152 0.035
1st codon position 3735 36.4 11.9 32.2 19.5 68.6 -0.062 0.245
2nd codon position 3735 46.2 18.8 20.3 14.6 66.5 -0.389 -0.126
3rd codon position 3735 46.3 6.1 42.4 5.2 88.7 -0.044 -0.073
tRNAs 1463 37.9 10.0 38.6 13.5 76.5 0.010 0.151
rRNAs 2102 40.8 6.9 39.4 12.9 80.2 -0.018 0.308
Control region 1086 46.8 5.8 43.9 3.5 90.7 -0.032 -0.247
T. (P.) legalis Whole genome 15625 36.7 15.7 38.3 9.3 75.0 0.021 -0.257
PCGs 11208 41.8 13.6 30.8 13.7 72.6 -0.152 0.004
1st codon position 3736 35.8 12.7 31.4 20.2 67.2 -0.066 0.229
2nd codon position 3736 46.0 19.3 20.3 14.5 66.3 -0.387 -0.144
3rd codon position 3736 43.7 9.0 40.7 6.6 84.4 -0.036 -0.151
tRNAs 1461 37.9 9.9 39.3 12.9 77.2 0.018 0.135
rRNAs 2103 40.8 7.0 38.3 13.9 79.1 -0.032 0.327
Control region 805 47 6.1 44.5 2.5 91.5 -0.027 -0.419
T. (P.) varipennis Whole genome 15772 39.0 13.1 38.8 9.1 77.8 -0.003 -0.182
PCGs 11202 43.6 11.5 32.4 12.4 76.0 -0.147 0.040
1st codon position 3734 36.6 11.8 32.6 19.0 69.2 -0.059 0.237
2nd codon position 3734 46.3 18.8 20.4 14.5 66.7 -0.390 -0.127
3rd codon position 3734 48.0 3.9 44.4 3.7 92.4 -0.039 -0.028
tRNAs 1464 38.5 9.7 38.9 12.8 77.4 0.005 0.139
rRNAs 2105 40.9 6.9 39.5 12.7 80.4 -0.017 0.296
Control region 957 47.5 5.3 43.9 3.2 91.4 -0.039 -0.247
T. (P.) yasumatsuana Whole genome 15735 37.2 15.2 38.2 9.4 75.4 0.013 -0.235
PCGs 11208 42.5 13.3 30.5 13.8 73.0 -0.164 0.019
1st codon position 3736 35.7 12.7 31.5 20.2 67.2 -0.063 0.227
2nd codon position 3736 45.9 19.5 20.2 14.4 66.1 -0.388 -0.149
3rd codon position 3736 45.9 7.6 39.8 6.7 85.7 -0.071 -0.062
tRNAs 1463 38.1 10.2 38.7 13.1 76.8 0.008 0.124
rRNAs 2106 40.9 7.0 38.5 13.5 79.4 -0.030 0.316
Control region 926 46.7 5.4 44.7 3.2 91.4 -0.022 -0.256
Figure 1. 

Gene maps of the mitochondrial genomes of the four T. (Pterelachisus) species involved in this study. The transcriptional direction is indicated by arrows.

The mitochondrial genomes of the four species share similar, but not identical, intergenic regions and overlaps. The longest intergenic regions, found between trnE and trnF genes, measure 32 bp, 27 bp, 32 bp, and 27 bp for T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, T. (P.) legalis, T. (P.) varipennis, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana, respectively. The longest overlaps, located between trnW and trnC genes, are consistent across all species at a length of 8 bp.

Protein-coding genes

All four mitochondrial genomes harbor 13 protein-coding genes, including COX1, COX2, COX3, CYTB, ATP6, ATP8, ND2, ND3, and ND6 on the majority strand, and ND4, ND4L, ND5, and ND1 on the minority strand (Fig. 1; Table 2). All species exhibit a pronounced AT richness, with A + T base content for T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, T. (P.) legalis, T. (P.) varipennis, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana at 74.6%, 72.6%, 76.0%, and 73.0%, respectively. The AT richness is especially evident in third codon positions, all exceeding 80.0%, with T. (P.) varipennis having the highest value at 92.4%. The first and second codon positions have lower AT skewness values, all below 70.0%. The most frequently encoded amino acids in these four T. (Pterelachisus) mitogenomes are Ser2, Leu2, Val, Gly, Pro, Thr, Arg, and Ala, with the highest Relative Synonymous Codon Usage (RSCU) values (Fig. 2). The most common codons are UUA, AUU, UUU, and AUA, and the majority of codons are composed solely of A or T, reflecting the high AT content of protein-coding genes (PCGs).

Figure 2. 

Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) in the mitogenomes of the four T. (Pterelachisus) species. Codes as follows: A: Ala; C: Cys; D: Asp; E: Glu; F: Phe; G: Gly; H: His; I: Ile; K: Lys; L: Leu; M: Met; N: Asn; P: Pro; Q: Gln; R: Arg; S: Ser; T: Thr; V: Val; W: Try; Y: Tyr.

For most PCGs, typical ATN start codons (ATT / ATG) are observed in both mitochondrial genomes, except for TCG in COX1 genes. Stop codons for most PCGs are T + tRNA, while CYTB has a stop codon TAG (Table 2). The sliding window analysis reveals variable nucleotide diversity (Pi) among the 13 PCGs in the four mitochondrial genomes, with ND2 exhibiting the highest Pi (0.308), followed by ATP8 (0.276) and ND6 (0.257). ND5 shows the lowest Pi (0.151) (Fig. 3A). Further examination of the Ka / Ks ratio for each PCG indicates values less than 1, suggesting purification selection. ND2 has a notably higher Ka / Ks ratio, indicating a higher evolutionary rate, while COX1 undergoes the highest purification selection. The Ka / Ks ratio of ND6 varies significantly among the four species, with T. (P.) varipennis having significantly higher values than the other species (Fig. 3B, Suppl. material 2).

Figure 3. 

A The nucleotide diversity (Pi) of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) in four T. (Pterelachisus) species mitogenomes determined via sliding window analysis (sliding window: 100 bp; step size: 25 bp); the Pi value of each gene is shown under the gene name B evolutionary rates (ratios of Ka/Ks) of mitochondrial protein-coding genes of the four T. (Pterelachisus) species.

Transfer RNA genes

All mitochondrial genomes encompass 22 tRNA genes, each capable of forming cloverleaf structures, with the exception of trnS1 (AGC), which has a dihydrouridine (DHU) arm forming a loop (Fig. 4). The length of the 22 tRNA genes ranges from 62 to 72 bp across the four mitochondrial genomes. The shortest trnC (GCA) genes are found in all species, with a length of 62 bp, except for trnC in T. (P.) varipennis, which is 63 bp. The longest tRNA genes are trnV (CAC) genes.

Figure 4. 

Secondary structures of tRNAs of T. (P.) varipennis. All tRNAs are labeled with the abbreviations of their corresponding amino acids. The variable sites are indicated with the green coloration for T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, blue coloration for T. (P.) legalis and pink coloration for T. (P.) yasumatsuana, respectively. A blank represents a missing base site.

The tRNA genes in all four species exhibit significant AT richness, with A + T base content for T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, T. (P.) legalis, T. (P.) varipennis, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana at 76.5%, 77.2%, 77.4%, and 76.8%, respectively (Table 3).

Ribosomal RNA genes and non-coding regions

All four mitochondrial genomes feature two ribosomal RNA genes, rrnL and rrnS, separated by trnV. The rrnL of all four species (1,319 bp –1,323 bp) is notably longer than the rrnS (782 bp –783 bp). The rRNA is significantly AT-rich in all species, with A + T base content for T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, T. (P.) legalis, T. (P.) varipennis, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana at 80.2%, 79.1%, 80.4%, and 79.4%, respectively (Table 3).

The control region for all four species is situated between rrnS and trnI genes, with lengths ranging from 800 bp to 1,100 bp. T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha has the longest control region at 1,806 bp, while T. (P.) legalis has the shortest at 805 bp. The control regions of all four species exhibit significant AT richness, with T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha, T. (P.) legalis, T. (P.) varipennis, and T. (P.) yasumatsuana having A + T base content of 90.7%, 91.5%, 91.4%, and 91.4%, respectively (Table 3).

The control regions for all four species were analyzed using the Tandem Repeat Finder, revealing two or three tandem repeats of varying lengths (Fig. 5). T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha and T. (P.) varipennis have two sets of tandem repeats, while T. (P.) legalis and T. (P.) yasumatsuana have three sets. Tandem repeats between different species exhibit no obvious common features, displaying unique structural and evolutionary characteristics.

Figure 5. 

Control region structure of the four T. (Pterelachisus) species. Orange, pink, and red coloration represent tandem repeats.

Phylogenetic analyses

Both Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) trees were reconstructed using four concatenated datasets (13PCG, 13PCG12, 13PCG + rRNA, and AA) of 31 mitochondrial genomes (Fig. 6, Suppl. material 3: figs S1–S6). The topologies of these trees show notable differences. Heterogeneity in pairwise sequence differences was examined and the results have shown the AA dataset with significantly lower heterogeneity compared to the other datasets (Fig. 7), which may be a major factor influencing the phylogenetic results.

Figure 6. 

Phylogenetic trees of the selected species of Tipuloidea inferred from the datasets PCG under A ML and B BI methods. Numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values (ML tree) or posterior probabilities (BI tree). The two species of family Trichoceridae were set as the outgroups.

Figure 7. 

AliGROOVE analysis for four datasets. The mean similarity score between sequences is represented by a colored square, based on AliGROOVE scores ranging from -1, indicating a large difference in sequence composition from the remainder of the dataset (red coloration), to +1, indicating similarity to all other comparisons (blue coloration).

The four T. (Pterelachisus) species involved in this study are divided into two stable lineages in each phylogenetic tree above: T. (P.) cinereocincta mesacantha and T. (P.) varipennis form a sister group, while T. (P.) legalis and T. (P.) yasumatsuana form another one. Furthermore, almost all the trees, except those based on the AA dataset (Fig. 7, Suppl. material 3: figs S1, S2, S4, S5), have shown that the four T. (Pterelachisus) species compose a monophyletic lineage, but with variable support values among different trees, whereas both the ML and BI trees based on the AA dataset suggest T. (Pterelachisus) is a paraphyletic group (Suppl. material 3: figs S3, S6). Since the samples for the large subgenus T. (Pterelachisus) used in this study are far from sufficient, the monophyly of T. (Pterelachisus) needs further study with more data.

The above “Vestiplex-Lunatipula” group of the Tipula subgenera are tentatively supported to be a monophyletic lineage by the phylogenetic results based on the 13PCG dataset (Fig. 6), but then the subgenus T. (Formotipula), unexpectedly, should be included in this group, in addition to T. (Vestiplex), T. (Lunatipula) and T. (Pterelachisus). These arguments largely agree with the phylogenetic results based on the 13PCG + rRNA dataset (Suppl. material 3: fig. S5) in the present study, as well as the previous research results of Gao et al. (2023), only with different topologies. On the contrary, the phylogenetic trees based on the AA (Suppl. material 3: figs S3, S6) and 13PCG12 (Suppl. material 3: figs S1, S4) datasets show that the “Vestiplex-Lunatipula” group is paraphyletic, and T. (Vestiplex) is a sister-group to the remaining Tipulidae. Morphologically, T. (Pterelachisus) and other related subgenera such as T. (Vestiplex), T. (Lunatipula), and other subgenera of Tipula share many similarities, making it difficult to distinguish between them (Savchenko 1964; Gelhaus 1986; 2005). This supports their potential monophyly to some extent. However, it is challenging to explain the close phylogenetic relationship of T. (Formotipula) with these subgenera. Obviously, in-depth research would be required to resolve the questions on its monophyly and relationships within the group. In addition, the genus Tipula is not supported to be a monophyletic lineage by any of the phylogenetic trees.

The monophyly of Tipulidae and the sister relationship between Tipulidae and Cylindrotomidae are strongly supported in all BI and ML trees constructed in this study, which are consistent with the previous phylogenetic studies of Ribeiro (2008), Petersen et al. (2010), Zhang et al. (2016), and Kang et al. (2017; 2023). Tipulidae was divided into three subfamilies, i.e., Ctenophorinae, Dolichopezinae, and Tipulinae (Kertesz 1902; Oosterbroek 2024). In the present phylogenetic study, Dolichopezinae is not included due to a lack of mitogenomic data on the subfamily. Meanwhile, as the only representative of Ctenophorinae, Tanyptera hebeiensis Yang & Yang, 1998 is sister to some members of Tipulinae (i.e., Tipula (Dendrotipula) flavolineata Meigen, 1804, Tipula (Vestiplex) aestiva Savchenko, 1960, or Nephrotoma spp. in different topologies) and then clustered with some other members of Tipulinae, which indicates a para- or polyphyly of the subfamily Tipulinae.

Corroborating previous phylogenetic studies (Ribeiro 2008; Petersen et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2016; Kang et al. 2023), Limoniidae is confirmed as a non-monophyletic group in this study. Among the four traditional subfamilies of Limoniidae established by Starý (1992), three are involved in the present phylogenetic study, i.e., Chioneinae, Limnophilinae, and Limoniinae. With relatively low supporting values, Symplecta hybrida (Meigen, 1804), the only representative of Chioneinae in this study, is sister to a clade of Cylindrotomidae + Tipulidae in almost all the trees except the BI one inferred from the dataset AA (Suppl. material 3: fig. S6). The traditional subfamily Limnophilinae is not supported as a monophyletic group, because one of its members, Epiphragma mediale Mao & Yang, 2019, has a relatively stable sister relationship with the clade of Limoniidae, instead of with other species of Limnophilinae, which is shown in all the BI trees and most ML trees except the one inferred from the dataset AA (Suppl. material 3: fig. S5). Similar results were also indicated in the previous studies by Kang et al. (2023) and Xu et al. (2023). Furthermore, the family Pediciidae is well supported to be sister to the remaining Tipuloidea, as all the phylogenetic analyses available on the Tipuloidea since Starý (1992).

Conclusions

In the present study, the complete mitochondrial genomes of four T. (Pterelachisus) species were newly assembled, annotated, and characterized. Tipula (P.) varipennis was first produced as a complete circle molecular structure based on previously published raw data (MT410829, 13,483bp), while another three were sequenced and reported upon for the first time. These four mitochondrial genomes show similarities in gene order, nucleotide composition, and codon usage with those of other known crane fly species. The phylogenetic results have reconfirmed the monophyly of the family Tipulidae, the sister relationship between Tipulidae and Cylindrotomidae, and the phylogenetic status of Pediciidae as sister group to the remaining Tipuloidea. On the other hand, the monophyly of the tipulid subfamily Tipulinae or the genus Tipula, as well as that of Limoniidae, have not been supported, while the limoniid subfamily Limnophilinae has been suggested as a polyphyletic group. The subgenus T. (Pterelachisus) might be a monophyletic lineage according to current mitogenome data, whereas it is not stable enough. Moreover, it has shown closer phylogenetic relationships between T. (Pterelachisus) and the subgenera T. (Formotipula), T. (Lunatipula), and T. (Vestiplex). The phylogenetic status of T. (Pterelachisus) in Tipulidae is under analysis using different mitogenomic datasets: both the ML and BI trees inferred from the AA dataset have shown more divergent topologies from other trees, probably due to the relatively lower heterogeneity of the dataset.

It is evident that the tiny number of samples is insufficient for a thorough phylogenetic analysis of the vast crane fly group. It is noteworthy to remember that, particularly in cases where the sample number is limited and replicates are few, mitochondrial genotyping may not be entirely successful in resolving deep phylogenetic relationships. This could lead to low support for particular evolutionary branches, which would impair the precision of the findings. However, this study provides new insights into the phylogenetic relationships within Tipulidae, particularly on T. (Pterelachisus). To better understand the phylogeny of crane flies, more samples covering a broader range of taxa will be necessary in the future study.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Xiao Zhang (Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China), Dr. Jinlong Ren (Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China), Mr. Ruiyu Zhang, and Ms. Aidi Yang (Shenyang, China) for their assistance during collecting the specimens used in this study. We are also very grateful to Dr. Scott Williams and Dr. Yan Yan (Boston) for checking the manuscript and providing linguistic improvements.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970444; 31501880) and the Scientific Research Foundation for the Introduced Talent of Shenyang Agricultural University (880415013).

Author contributions

Yan Li and Ding Yang planned and designed the research. Yuetian Gao and Wanxin Cai performed experiments, and Yuetian Gao and Yupeng Li analyzed the data. Yuetian Gao wrote and other authors revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the manuscript for publication and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Author ORCIDs

Yuetian Gao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-1745

Wanxin Cai https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-4899

Yupeng Li https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5381-2260

Yan Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4896-5843

Ding Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-3478

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Alexander CP (1965) New subgenera and species of crane-flies from California (Diptera: Tipulidae). Pacific Insects 7: 333–386.
  • Alexander KNA (2002) The invertebrates of living and decaying timber in Britain and Ireland: a provisional annotated checklist. English Nature Research 467: 1–142.
  • Beckenbach AT (2012) Mitochondrial genome sequences of Nematocera (Lower Diptera): evidence of rearrangement following a complete genome duplication in a winter crane fly. Genome Biology and Evolution 4(2): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evr131
  • Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF (2013) MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69(2): 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023
  • Brindle A (1960) The larvae and pupae of the British Tipulinae (Diptera: Tipulidae). Transactions of the Society for British Entomology 14: 63–114.
  • Cai W, Gao Y, Li Y, Jiang L (2023) Morphological description of the last instar larva of Tipula (Pterelachisus) cinereocincta mesacantha Alexander 1934 (Diptera: Tipuloidea: Tipulidae), a newly recorded crane fly from China. Zoomorphology 142: 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-023-00603-w
  • Ding S, Li W, Wang Y, Cameron SL, Murányi D, Yang D (2019) The phylogeny and evolutionary timescale of stoneflies (Insecta: Plecoptera) inferred from mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 135: 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.03.005
  • Du Z, Hasegawa H, Cooley JR, Simon C, Yoshimura J, Cai W, Sota T, Li H (2019) Mitochondrial genomics reveals shared phylogeographic patterns and demographic history among three periodical cicada species groups. Molecular Biology and Evolution 36(6): 1187–1200. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz051
  • Du Z, Wu Y, Chen Z, Cao L, Ishikawa T, Kamitani S, Sota T, Song F, Tian L, Cai W, Li H (2021) Global phylogeography and invasion history of the spotted lanternfly revealed by mitochondrial phylogenomics. Evolutionary Applications 14(4): 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13170
  • Gelhaus J (1986) Larvae of the crane fly genus Tipula in North America (Diptera: Tipulidae). The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 53: 121–182.
  • Gelhaus J (2005) Systematics and biogeography of the desert crane fly subgenus Tipula (Eremotipula) Alexander (Diptera: Tipulidae). Memoirs of the American Entomological Society 46: 1–235.
  • Gorban I, Podeniene V (2022) Dipteran (Bibionomorpha and Tipulomorpha) diversity in dead wood in Lithuania. Biodiversity Data Journal 10(e85034): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e85034
  • Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, Chen C, Graham M, Van Domselaar G, Stothard P (2023) Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 51(W1): W484–W492. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad326
  • Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, De Waard JR (2003) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences (Suppl.)270: S96–S99. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025
  • Kang Z, Zhang X, Ding S, Tang C, Wang Y, Jong HD, Cameron SL, Wang M, Yang D (2017) Transcriptomes of three species of Tipuloidea (Diptera, Tipulomorpha) and implications for phylogeny of Tipulomorpha. PLOS ONE 12(3): e0173207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173207
  • Kang Z, Xu Y, Wang G, Yang D, Zhang X (2023) First mitochondrial genomes of the crane fly tribe Elephantomyiini (Diptera, Tipuloidea, Limoniidae): comparative analysis and phylogenetic implications. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 81: 731–746. https://doi.org/10.3897/asp.81.e97946
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kramer J, Langlois D (2019) Craneflies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) of the ravin de valbois, France. Dipterists Digest 26: 73–85.
  • Kück P, Meid SA, Groß C, Wägele JW, Misof B (2014) AliGROOVE – visualization of heterogeneous sequence divergence within multiple sequence alignments and detection of inflated branch support. BMC Bioinformatics 15(294): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-294
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2016) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Li H, Leavengood JM, Chapman EG, Burkhardt D, Song F, Jiang P, Liu J, Zhou X, Cai W (2017) Mitochondrial phylogenomics of Hemiptera reveals adaptive innovations driving the diversification of true bugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284(1862): 20171223. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1223
  • Lin X, Zhao Y, Yan L, Liu W, Bu W, Wang X, Zheng C (2022a) Mitogenomes provide new insights into the evolutionary history of Prodiamesinae (Diptera: Chironomidae). Zoologica Scripta 51(1): 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12516
  • Lin X, Liu Z, Yan L, Duan X, Bu W, Wang X, Zheng C (2022b) Mitogenomes provide new insights of evolutionary history of Boreoheptagyiini and Diamesini (Diptera: Chironomidae: Diamesinae). Ecology and Evolution 12(5): e8957. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8957
  • Liu Q, Liu Y, Liu Q, Tian L, Li H, Song F, Cai W (2023) Exploring the mitogenomes of Mantodea: new insights from structural diversity and higher-level phylogenomic analyses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24(13): 10570. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310570
  • Lorenz C, Alves JMP, Foster PG, Suesdek L, Sallum MAM (2021) Phylogeny and temporal diversification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) with an emphasis on the Neotropical fauna. Systematic Entomology 46(4): 798–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12489
  • Lowe TM, Chan PP (2016) tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Research 44(W1): W54–W57. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw413
  • Men Q, Xue G, Sun M, Sun Z (2017) Crane flies in the family Tipulidae (Diptera: Tipuloidea) from Dayaoshan National Nature Reserve, China, with description of one new species in the genus Indotipula and analysis of DNA barcodes. Entomotaxonomia 39(4): 251–264.
  • Meng G, Li Y, Yang C, Liu S (2019) MitoZ: a toolkit for animal mitochondrial genome assembly, annotation and visualization. Nucleic Acids Research 47(11): e63. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz173
  • Oosterbroek P (2024) Catalogue of the Craneflies of the World (Diptera, Tipuloidea: Pediciidae, Limoniidae, Cylindrotomidae, Tipulidae). Catalogue of the Craneflies of the World (Diptera, Tipuloidea: Pediciidae, Limoniidae, Cylindrotomidae, Tipulidae). https://ccw.naturalis.nl/ [accessed 12 January 2024]
  • Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL (2012) IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28(11): 1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174
  • Perna NT, Kocher TD (1995) Patterns of nueleotide composition at fourfold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 41(3): 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01215182
  • Petersen MJ, Bertone MA, Wiegmann BM, Courtney GW (2010) Phylogenetic synthesis of morphological and molecular data reveals new insights into the higher-level classification of Tipuloidea (Diptera). Systematic Entomology 35(3): 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00524.x
  • Pilipenko VE, Salmela J, Vesterinen E (2012) Description and DNA barcoding of Tipula (Pterelachisus) recondita sp. n. from the Palaearctic region (Diptera, Tipulidae). ZooKeys 192: 51–65. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.192.2364
  • Polevoi AV, Pilipenko VE (2016) The first records of the crane flies Tipula apicispina and T. stenostyla (Diptera: Tipulidae) from Russian Karelia with new data on their bionomics. Zoosystematica Rossica 25(2): 380–386. https://doi.org/10.31610/zsr/2016.25.2.380
  • Ren J, Zhang B, Yang D (2019a) The mitochondrial genome of Chinese endemic species Pseudolimnophila (Pseudolimnophila) brunneinota (Diptera: Limoniidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 4(2): 3742–3743. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2019.1681313
  • Ribeiro GC (2008) Phylogeny of the Limnophilinae (Limoniidae) and early evolution of the Tipulomorpha (Diptera). Invertebrate Systematics 22: 627–694. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS08017
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(12): 3299–3302. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248
  • Savchenko EN (1964) Crane-flies (Diptera, Tipulidae), Subfam. Tipulinae, Genus Tipula L., 2. Fauna USSR, N.S. 89, Nasekomye Dvukrylye [Diptera], 2(4): 1–503.
  • Savchenko EN (1979) Phylogenie und systematik der Tipulidae. Translated and revised by Br. Theowald and G. Theischinger. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 122: 91–126.
  • Sharkey MJ, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Chapman EG, Smith MA, Dapkey T, Brown A, Ratnasingham S, Naik S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Milton M, Hebert P, Shaw SR, Kittel RN, Solis MA, Metz MA, Goldstein PZ, Brown JW, Quicke DLJ, van Achterberg C, Brown BV, Burns JM (2021) Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species. ZooKeys 1013: 1–665. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600
  • Song N, Xi Y, Yin X (2022) Phylogenetic relationships of Brachycera (Insecta: Diptera) inferred from mitochondrial genome sequences. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 196(2): 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab125
  • Starý J (1992) Phylogeny and classification of Tipulomorpha, with special emphasis on the family Limoniidae. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 35: 11–36.
  • Theowald B (1980) 15. Tipulidae. In: Lindner E (Ed.) Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region, 3(5)1, Lief. 324: 437–538.
  • Timmermans MJTN, Vogler AP (2012) Phylogenetically informative rearrangements in mitochondrial genomes of Coleoptera, and monophyly of aquatic elateriform beetles (Dryopoidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63(2): 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.12.021
  • Wei S, Chen X (2011) Progress in research on the comparative mitogenomics of insects. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology 48(6): 1573–1585.
  • Wilson AC, Cann RL, Carr SM, George M, Gyllensten UB, Helmbychowski KM, Higuchi RG, Palumbi SR, Prager EM, Sage RD, Stoneking M (1985) Mitochondrial DNA and two perspectives on evolutionary genetics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 26(4): 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb02048.x
  • Xu Y, Zhang S, Chen Y, Wang G, Yang D, Zhang X (2023) Contribution to the knowledge of Dicranoptychini (Diptera, Tipuloidea, Limoniidae) in China, with the first mitochondrial genome of the tribe and its phylogenetic implications. Insects 14: 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14060535
  • Zhang X, Kang Z, Mao M, Li X, Cameron SL, Jong H de, Wang M, Yang D (2016) Comparative mt genomics of the Tipuloidea (Diptera: Nematocera: Tipulomorpha) and its implications for the phylogeny of the Tipulomorpha. PLOS ONE 11(6): e0158167. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158167
  • Zhang B, Gao S, Cao Y, Chang W, Yang D (2019b) The mitochondrial genome of Tipula (Formotipula) melanomera gracilispina (Diptera: Tipulidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 4(1): 240–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2018.1546136
  • Zhang X, Kang Z, Ding S, Wang Y, Borkent C, Saigusa T, Yang D (2019c) Mitochondrial genomes provide insights into the phylogeny of Culicomorpha (Insecta: Diptera). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20(3): 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030747
  • Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li W, Wang G (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096
  • Zhang X, Yang D, Kang Z (2023) New data on the mitochondrial genome of Nematocera (lower Diptera): features, structures and phylogenetic implications. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 197(1): 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac012
  • Zhao C, Qian X, Wang S, Li Y, Zhang X (2019) The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis of Tipula (Yamatotipula) nova Walker, 1848 (Diptera, Tipulidae) from Qingdao, Shandong, China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 4(2): 4211–4213. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2019.1693305
  • Zhao C, Kang Z, Xu Y, Zhang X (2021) Tanyptera (Tanyptera) hebeiensis Yang et Yang (Diptera: Tipulidae) newly recorded from Shandong, China: sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 6(1): 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1848478

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Information of the voucher specimens used for mitochondrial genomes sequencing in the present study

Yuetian Gao, Wanxin Cai, Yupeng Li, Yan Li, Ding Yang

Data type: docx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (19.14 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Synonymous and non-synonymous substitutional analysis of gene ATP6, ATP8, COX1, COX2, COX3, CYTB, ND1, ND2, ND3, ND4, ND4L, ND5, ND6

Yuetian Gao, Wanxin Cai, Yupeng Li, Yan Li, Ding Yang

Data type: docx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (41.52 kb)
Supplementary material 3 

Phylogenetic trees

Yuetian Gao, Wanxin Cai, Yupeng Li, Yan Li, Ding Yang

Data type: pdf

Explanation note: figure S1. Phylogenetic trees of the selected species of Tipuloidea inferred from the datasets 13PCG12 under ML methods. Numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values. The two species of family Trichoceridae were set as the outgroups; figure S2. Phylogenetic trees of the selected species of Tipuloidea inferred from the datasets 13PCG+rRNA under ML methods. Numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values. The two species of family Trichoceridae were set as the outgroup; figure S3. Phylogenetic trees of the selected species of Tipuloidea inferred from the datasets AA under ML methods. Numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values. The two species of family Trichoceridae were set as the outgroups; figure S4. Phylogenetic trees of the selected species of Tipuloidea inferred from the datasets 13PCG12 under BI methods. Numbers at the nodes are posterior probabilities. The two species of family Trichoceridae were set as the outgroups; figure S5. Phylogenetic trees of the selected species of Tipuloidea inferred from the datasets 13PCG+rRNA under BI methods. Numbers at the nodes are posterior probabilities. The two species of family Trichoceridae were set as the outgroups; figure S6. Phylogenetic trees of the selected species of Tipuloidea inferred from the datasets AA under BI methods. Numbers at the nodes are posterior probabilities. The two species of family Trichoceridae were set as the outgroups.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (4.34 MB)
login to comment