Female. Maxillary cardo with a few thin, pale bristles, the apex of these not extending beyond the maxillary lacinia. Antenna short, stout, and thickened toward middle of flagellum (fusiform); F1 less than 3× its width. Supra-antennal area of frons produced anteriorly into a frontal ledge overhanging the antennal radicle. Apical margin of labrum not or slightly emarginated medially. Metapleuron strongly convex above level of lateral face of pronotum and metapleuron (dorsal view). Metapostnotum narrow and practically linear, deeply sunken between the metanotum and propodeum. Crossvein cu-a of hind wing short and almost straight, forming obtuse angle with vein 1A. Male. Antenna slightly thickened medially, usually with F3–F11 triangularly produced beneath (except for N. orientalis Loktionov, Lelej & Xu, sp. n. and N. shimizui Loktionov, Lelej & Xu, sp. n.); F1 1.3–2.0× its width. Mandible with one subapical inner tooth. Body punctate. Exposed portion of hypopygium stick-like, compressed laterally; subbasal portion strongly widened (Figs 21, 42, 48).

Nine species. Nipponodipogon hayachinensis (Ishikawa, 1968), ♀ (Japan: Honshu); N. iwatai (Ishikawa, 1965), ♀ & ♂ (Japan: Hokkaido and Honshu); N. kurilensis (Lelej, 1986), ♀ (Russia: Kuril Islands); N. mandibularis (Ishikawa, 1965), ♀ (Japan: Honshu); N. nagasei (Ishikawa, 1965), ♀ & ♂ (Japan: Hokkaido, Honshu and Kyushu); N. rossicus (Lelej, 1986), ♀ & ♂ (Russia: Primorskij Terr.); N. sudai Shimizu in Shimizu, Lelej & Loktionov, 2015, ♀ & ♂ (Japan: Hokkaido and Honshu) (Shimizu et al. 2015 and Shimizu and Terayama 2016); N. orientalis Loktionov, Lelej & Xu, sp. n., ♀ & ♂ (China: Guangdong, Hainan and Yunnan); N. shimizui Loktionov, Lelej & Xu, sp. n., ♀ & ♂ (China: Guangdong and Yunnan).

Palaearctic Region (Russia: Primorskij Terr., Kuril Islands; Japan: Hokkaido, Honshu, Kyushu) and Oriental Region (new record) (China: Guangdong, Hainan, Yunnan).

The representatives of the genus Nipponodipogon are brood parasitic wasps. Nipponodipogon nagasei and N. iwatai brood-parasitize species of Deuteragenia Šustera, 1912 (tribe Deuterageniini), and N. iwatai brood-parasitizes species of Auplopus Spinola, 1841 (tribe Auplopodini). Female of N. nagasei routinely lays up to five eggs on a single host spider, all of which develop into adult wasps without larval cannibalism, instead all spider wasps previously studied lay only one egg on a host spider (Shimizu et al. 2012).

Holotype. CHINA: ♀, Guangdong, Nankunshan, 4–6.VI.2011, Zai-fu Xu, No. 2016001247 (SCAU). Paratypes. CHINA: 2 ♀, with the same data as holotype, No. 2016001227 and 2016001217 (SCAU); 1 ♀, with the same data as holotype, No. 2016001255 (SCAU); 1 ♀, Hainan, Diaoluoshan, 12–13.VII.2010, Hua-yan Chen, No. 2016000370 (SCAU); 1 ♂, Yunnan, Gaoligongshan, 20–21.VII.2006, Zai-fu Xu, No. 2016000480 (IBSS); 1 ♂, Yunnan, Gaoligongshan, 20–21.VII.2006, Zai-fu Xu, No. 2016000479 (SCAU).

Female. Mesosoma completely yellow orange (Figs 1, 7). Posterolateral portion of propodeum with strong transverse rugae (Figs 5–7). T1 with long petiole basally (Fig. 6). Outer apicoventral corner of the metafemur produced triangularly (Fig. 8). Male. T1 distinctly petiolate basally (Fig. 15). F3–F11 not produced triangularly beneath, not forming serrated profile. Propodeum matt, with weak dense transverse striae posterolaterally (Fig. 15). Subbasal portion of hypopygium with round sublateral carina (Fig. 21, arrow).

Female. Body length 6.1–8.0 mm; fore wing length 4.7–6.2 mm. Head and metasoma black; sometimes clypeus along anterior margin brownish; antenna black, except flagellomeres 3–10 muddy yellow ventrally and sometimes scape and pedicel yellowish-brown ventrally; mandible brownish subapically. Mesosoma completely yellow orange (Figs 1, 7). Legs brown with abundant yellowish-brown (Fig. 1) to completely muddy yellowish. Fore wing weakly infuscate or sometimes more or less yellowish, with distinct two fuscous bands (Fig. 9). Hind wing weakly infuscate (Fig. 10).

Head and mesosoma matt. Frons, vertex, and mesosoma, except propodeum, finely and densely punctate. Pronotum anteriorly, laterally and collar finely striate and punctate. Mesopleuron with denser punctures. Upper mesopleuron and metapleuron finely and densely striate. Lateral side of metanotum with several regular oblique striae. Propodeum strongly and densely punctate with fine transverse rugae posteriorly and much stronger rugae posterolaterally (Figs 5–7). Metasoma somewhat polished. T1–T5 with fine punctures; T6 and S6 less polished than other segments, with scattered setiferous pores located on all exposed portion; S1–S5 with somewhat larger punctures than on T1–T5. S1 with several longitudinal rugae baso-medially. Transverse groove on S2 gently arcuate.

Body with gray pubescence mostly short, but longer on clypeus, mesopleuron, propodeum posterolaterally and coxae. Body without setae except the following: upper frons sometimes with one long erect setae and a few shorter ones; clypeus with a few long suberect setae anteriorly; coxae and T1 basally with scattered short erect setae; S2–S5 with scattered longer erect setae posteriorly; T6 and S6 with denser long erect pale setae.

Width of head in frontal view 1.1–1.2× its height. Vertex weakly convex between eye tops (Fig. 3). Upper frons gently convex (Fig. 4). Frons without median line, but sometimes with indistinct elongate concavity medially. Supra-antennal area of frons produced anteriorly into a frontal ledge overhanging the antennal radicle (Fig. 4). Inner orbits weakly convergent above and subparallel below (Fig. 3). Half of MID 1.3–1.4× eye width. Ocelli large, slightly raised; ocellar triangle acute-angled (Fig. 2); POD/OOD=0.8–1.1. Posterior margin of vertex roundly concave (dorsal view) (Fig. 2). Clypeus convex medially with distinct concavity basolaterally; anterolateral corner broadly rounded; anterior margin almost straight or weakly emarginate medially; width 2.7–2.9× its length. Apical margin of labrum broadly rounded. Mandible with subapical tooth. Maxillary cardo with two tufts of thin, light brown bristles. Malar space short. Gena strongly narrowing posteriorly (Fig. 2, dorsal view; Fig. 4, lateral view). Antenna short, stout, and thickened toward middle of flagellum; F1–F3 distinctly widening toward apex; apex of apical flagellomere pointed; F1 length 0.95–1.0× F2 length; F1 length 2.2–2.4× its width and 0.50–0.65× UID.

Pronotum with anterior declivity flattened, not distinctly differentiated from dorsum; dorsum in dorsal view slightly narrowing anteriorly; shoulder gently rounded; juncture between dorsal and lateral faces narrowly and roundly raised; posterior margin weakly and arcuately emarginate medially. Mesoscutum slightly sloped anteriorly; posterolateral margin not reflexed; parapsidal sulcus finely impressed. Discs of mesoscutellum and metanotum barely raised above level of mesoscutum and propodeum (Fig. 7). Metapostnotum narrow and practically linear, deeply sunken between metanotum and propodeum (Fig. 6). Propodeum evenly convex with flattened posterior declivity not well differentiated from dorsum (Fig. 7).

Fore wing (Fig. 9) with SMC2 receiving crossvein 1m-cu at almost middle; SMC3 1.1–1.2× longer than SMC2 on vein M, and 0.6–0.7× longer than SMC2 on vein Rs; receiving crossvein 2m-cu at almost middle; crossvein 2rs-m almost straight or sometimes barely curved; crossvein 3rs-m distinctly curved; crossvein cu-a barely postfurcal. Hind wing (Fig. 10). Outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly (Fig. 8). Claws symmetrical with large subapical inner tooth. T1 distinctly petiolate (Fig. 6). S6 with a longitudinal median rounded carina posteriorly.

Male. Body length 3.7–4.6 mm; fore wing length 3.5–4.1 mm. Body black; antenna black with scape brown or black ventrally and flagellum weakly brown ventrally; mandible brown subapically; pro- tibia and tarsi brown; spurs of pro- and mesotibia brown, spurs of metatibia dark brown (Fig. 11). Fore wing weakly infuscate, with weak subapical fuscous band (Fig. 16). Hind wing weakly infuscate (Fig. 17).

Body mostly punctate and somewhat polished. Frons, discs of pronotum, mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, and metanotum finely and densely punctate. Pronotum laterally polished and indistinctly punctate. Mesopleuron with coarser punctures than frons. Upper mesopleuron striate. Lateral side of metanotum with several regular oblique striae. Metapleuron finely punctate. Propodeum more or less matt, finely and densely punctate with weak dense transverse striae posterolaterally. Metasomal segments finely punctate. S1 with several longitudinal rugae basally. Transverse groove on S2 weak, gently arcuate, not connected medially. S6 with scattered setiferous pores (Fig. 18). Body with gray pubescence mostly short, but longer on lower face, clypeus, propleuron, propodeum posteriorly and mesepisternum. Body without setae except the following: upper frons with one long erect setae; T7 and S6 with long erect brown setae.

Width of head in frontal view 1.1× its height. Vertex moderately convex between eye tops (Fig. 13). Upper frons gently convex (Fig. 14). Frons without median line, with indistinct elongate concavity medially. Supra-antennal area of frons produced anteriorly into weak frontal ledge overhanging the antennal radicle (Fig. 14). Inner orbits subparallel above and barely convergent below (Fig. 13). Half of MID 1.4–1.6× eye width. Ocelli large, noticeably raised; ocellar triangle right-angled (Fig. 12); POD/OOD=0.75–0.85. Posterior margin of vertex straight (dorsal view) (Fig. 12). Clypeus weakly convex medially; anterolateral corner broadly rounded; anterior margin barely broadly rounded, almost straight medially. Mandible with subapical tooth. Malar space short. Gena narrowing posteriorly (Fig. 12, dorsal view; Fig. 14, lateral view). Antenna shortened; flagellum filiform; flagellomeres indistinctly convex ventrally, not forming triangle projection; apex of apical flagellomere pointed; F1 length 0.9–1.0× F2 length; F1 length 1.85–1.90× its width and 0.30–0.36× UID.

Pronotum with anterior declivity weakly concave, more differentiated from dorsum than in female; dorsum in dorsal view narrowing anteriorly; shoulder gently rounded; juncture between dorsal and lateral faces roundly raised; posterior margin weakly and arcuately emarginate. Mesoscutum slightly sloped anteriorly; parapsidal sulcus finely impressed. Discs of mesoscutellum and metanotum somewhat more strongly raised above level of mesoscutum and propodeum than in female. Metapostnotum (Fig. 15) longer and not deeply sunken between metanotum and propodeum, as in female; somewhat narrowing in middle; metapostnotum length 0.15–0.25× metanotum length medially. Propodeum evenly convex with posterior declivity not differentiated from dorsum; posterior surface evenly convex.

Fore wing (Fig. 16), hind wing (Fig. 17). Claws symmetrical with large subapical inner tooth. T1 distinctly petiolate; petiole long (Fig. 15). S6 deeply and arcuately emarginate posteriorly; lateral hook small, curved and pointed to apex (Fig. 18). Exposed portion of hypopygium stick form, compressed laterally, narrow (both in lateral and ventral views), weakly widened apically; subbasal portion extended laterally, with short erected stout spines (Figs 21, 22). Paramere broadly widened basally and narrowing toward apex (lateral view), with long bristles, longer bristle as long as paramere; volsella broad apically (lateral view) (Figs 19, 20).

The female of new species is similar to those of Nipponodipogon kurilensis, N. sudai, and N. shimizui sp. n. by having outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly (Fig. 8) and T1 petiolate basally (Fig. 6), but can be separated from all of them in having mesosoma completely yellow orange (Figs 1, 7) (vs completely or mostly black (Figs 23, 29)) and posterolateral portion of propodeum with strong transverse rugae (Figs 5–7) (vs with fine transverse striae or/and punctures (Figs 27–29, 44)). Female of N. orientalis sp. n. differs from that of N. kurilensis in having T1 with long petiole (Fig. 6) (vs short one in N. kurilensis (Shimizu et al. 2015: fig. 3D)); and from that of N. shimizui sp. n. in having crossvein 3rs-m distinctly curved (Fig. 9) and T6 somewhat polished, not shagreened, with distinct scattered setiferous pores (vs crossvein 3rs-m almost straight and T6 matt, shagreened, without distinct setiferous pores in N. shimizui sp. n. (Figs 31, 39)).

Male of new species is closely related to that of N. shimizui sp. n. by some morphological characters including shape of hypopygium and genitalia, but easily distinguishes in propodeum with fine transverse striae posterolaterally (Fig. 15) (vs propodeum without any striae in N. shimizui sp. n. (Fig. 38)); exposed portion of hypopygium narrow in lateral view (Fig. 22) (vs noticeably wider in N. shimizui sp. n. (Fig. 43)); subbasal portion of hypopygium in ventral view with round sublateral carina (Fig. 21, arrow) (vs with angulate sublateral carina in N. shimizui sp. n. (Fig. 42, arrow)); S6 with setiferous pores posteromedially (Fig. 18) (vs without setiferous pores posteromedially in N. shimizui sp. n. (Fig. 39)). Male of new species is also similar to that of N. sudai in having petiole on T1 basally (Fig. 15), but can be easily differentiated by having F3–F11 not producing triangularly beneath, not forming serrated profile (vsF3–F11 produced triangularly beneath, forming serrated profile in N. sudai); lateral hook on S6 small, claw-like, curved and pointed to apex (Fig. 18) (vs lateral hook on S6 large, strongly compressed laterally and thin, subtriangular in profile in N. sudai (Fig. 46)); and exposed portion of hypopygium without long erect setae (Figs 21, 22) (vs with long erect setae in N. sudai (Fig. 48)).

In spite of the fact that females and males were collected in different locations (two males from Yunnan and five females from Guangdong and Hainan) and have different coloration (mesosoma completely yellow orange in female vs completely black in male), we consider that they are opposite sexes of same species. Male of new species has propodeum with fine transverse striae posterolaterally that correlates with strong transverse rugae on propodeum posteriorly, especially in posterolateral portion in female (vs male without any striae, female with fine transverse striae in Nipponodipogon shimizui sp. n.). Such coloration differences in female and male of new species are not exception and occur in widely distributed Palaearctic species Arachnotheutes rufithorax (Costa, 1881) (Loktionov and Lelej 2017: figs 87, 88).

The name of the new species refers to the first record of the genus in the Oriental Region.

China (Guangdong, Hainan, Yunnan).

Holotype. CHINA: ♀, Guangdong, Nanling, 8–17.VIII.2010, Hua-yan Chen, yellow pan traps, No. 2016001839 (SCAU). Paratypes. CHINA: 3 ♀, with the same data as holotype, No. 2016001836, 2016001840 and 2016001842 (SCAU); 1 ♀, with the same data as holotype, No. 2016001837 (IBSS); 1 ♀, Guangdong, Nanling, 5–7.VI.2010, Hua-yan Chen, No. 2016000023 (SCAU); 1 ♂, Yunnan, Lushui, 19.VII.2006, Zai-fu Xu, No. 2016000326 (SCAU).

Female. Outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly (Fig. 30). T1 with distinct petiole basally (Fig. 28). Crossvein 2rs-m almost straight or sometimes barely curved; crossvein 3rs-m straight or almost straight (Fig. 31). Mesoscutum raised along midline (Fig. 29). Head and mesosoma matt; metasoma somewhat polished. Male. T1 distinctly petiolate basally (Fig. 38). F3–F11 not produced triangularly beneath, not forming serrated profile. Propodeum polished, without any striae (Fig. 38). Subbasal portion of hypopygium with angulate sublateral carina (Fig. 42, arrow).

Female. Body length 5.2–6.4 mm; fore wing length 4.3–5.1 mm. Head, mesosoma and metasoma black; sometimes clypeus along anterior margin dark brown; antenna black, except F3–F10 muddy yellow ventrally and scape yellowish-brown ventrally; mandible brownish subapically. Legs yellowish-brown or brown with procoxa laterally, profemur externally, meso- and metafemur, tibiae apically and tarsi somewhat darker (Fig. 23). Fore wing weakly infuscate, with weak subbasal and preapical fuscous bands (Fig. 31). Hind wing weakly infuscate (Fig. 32).

Head and mesosoma matt. Frons, vertex and mesosoma, except propodeum, finely and densely punctate. Pronotum laterally and finely striate and punctate. Mesopleuron with denser and coarser punctures then on disc of pronotum. Upper mesopleuron rugose. Metapleuron finely and densely striate. Lateral side of metanotum with several regular oblique striae. Propodeum strongly and densely punctate with fine transverse rugae posteriorly. Metasoma somewhat polished, except T6 and S6 matt. T1–T5 with fine punctures; T6 finely shagreened, without distinct setiferous pores; S6 less shagreened, than T6, with scattered setiferous pores located posteriorly and postero-laterally; S1–S5 with somewhat larger punctures than on T1–T5. S1 with several longitudinal rugae medially. Transverse groove on S2 gently arcuate.

Body with gray pubescence mostly short, but longer on propodeum posterolaterally. Body without setae except the following: upper frons sometimes with one long erect setae; clypeus with a few long suberect setae anteriorly; S2–S5 with scattered long or short erect setae posteriorly; T6 and S6 with denser long erect pale setae.

Width of head in frontal view 1.1–1.2× its height. Vertex weakly convex between eye tops (Fig. 25). Upper frons gently convex (Fig. 26). Frons with indistinct median line and fine elongate concavity medially. Supra-antennal area of frons produced anteriorly into a frontal ledge overhanging the antennal radicle (Fig. 26). Inner orbits weakly convergent above and subparallel below (Fig. 25). Half of MID 1.3–1.6× eye width. Ocelli large, slightly raised; ocellar triangle barely acute-angled (Fig. 24); POD/OOD=0.6–0.8. Posterior margin of vertex roundly concave (dorsal view) (Fig. 24). Clypeus convex medially with distinct concavity basolaterally; anterolateral corner broadly rounded; anterior margin almost straight or weakly emarginate medially; width 2.7× its length. Apical margin of labrum broadly rounded. Mandible with large subapical tooth and indistinct basal tooth. Maxillary cardines with two tufts of thin, light brown bristles. Malar space short. Gena narrowing posteriorly (Fig. 24, dorsal view; Fig. 26, lateral view). Antenna short, stout, and thickened toward middle of flagellum; F1–F4 distinctly widening toward apex; apex of apical flagellomere pointed; F1 length 0.90–0.95× F2 length; F1 length 2.2–2.6× its width and 0.5× UID.

Pronotum with anterior declivity flattened, not distinctly differentiated from dorsum; dorsum in dorsal view slightly narrowing anteriorly; shoulder gently rounded; juncture between dorsal and lateral faces narrowly and roundly raised; posterior margin weakly and arcuately emarginate medially (Fig. 24). Mesoscutum slightly sloped anteriorly; disc along median line slightly convex; posterolateral margin not reflexed; parapsidal sulcus finely impressed. Discs of mesoscutellum and metanotum barely raised above level of mesoscutum and propodeum (Fig. 29). Metapostnotum narrow and practically linear, deeply sunken between metanotum and propodeum (Fig. 28). Propodeum evenly convex with flattened posterior declivity not well differentiated from dorsum (Fig. 29).

Fore wing (Fig. 31) with SMC2 receiving crossvein 1m-cu at almost middle; SMC3 1.2–1.5× longer than SMC2 on vein M, and 0.8–1.1× longer than SMC2 on vein Rs; receiving crossvein 2m-cu at almost middle; crossvein 2rs-m almost straight or sometimes barely curved; crossvein 3rs-m straight, sometimes barely curved; crossvein cu-a barely postfurcal. Hind wing (Fig. 32). Outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly (Fig. 30). Claws symmetrical with large subapical inner tooth. T1 distinctly petiolate (Fig. 28). S6 with a longitudinal median rounded carina posteriorly.

Male. Body length 3.8 mm; fore wing length 3.4 mm. Body black; antenna black with scape brown ventro-apically and flagellum indistinctly brownish ventrally; mandible brown subapically; protibia and protarsi brown; spurs of tibia brown (Fig. 33). Fore wing weakly infuscate, with darker apical portion, fuscous band indistinct (Fig. 37). Hind wing weakly infuscate. Body mostly punctate and somewhat polished. Frons, discs of pronotum, mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, metanotum finely and densely punctate. Pronotum laterally polished and indistinctly punctate. Mesopleuron with coarser punctures than frons. Upper mesopleuron without striate. Lateral side of metanotum with several regular oblique striae. Metapleuron indistinctly punctate. Propodeum basolaterally polished with fine punctures larger than on frons, without any striae. Metasomal segments finely punctate. S1 with several longitudinal rugae basally. Transverse groove on S2 weak. S6 lacking setiferous pores posteromedially (Fig. 39). Body with gray pubescence mostly short, but longer on lower face, clypeus, and propodeum posteriorly. Body without setae except upper frons with one long erect setae and clypeus with a few long suberect setae anteriorly.

Width of head in frontal view 1.1× its height. Vertex moderately convex between eye tops (Fig. 35). Upper frons gently convex (Fig. 36). Frons without median line, with indistinct elongate concavity medially. Supra-antennal area of frons produced anteriorly into weak frontal ledge overhanging antennal radicle (Fig. 36). Inner orbits subparallel above and barely convergent below (Fig. 35). Half of MID 1.6× eye width. Ocelli large, noticeably raised; ocellar triangle right-angled (Fig. 34); POD/OOD=0.9. Posterior margin of vertex straight (dorsal view) (Fig. 34). Clypeus weakly convex medially; anterolateral corner rounded; anterior margin broadly rounded. Mandible with subapical tooth. Malar space short. Gena weakly narrowing posteriorly (Fig. 34, dorsal view; Fig. 36, lateral view). Antenna shortened; flagellum filiform; flagellomeres indistinctly convex ventrally, not forming triangle projection; apex of apical flagellomere pointed; F1 length 1.0× F2 length; F1 length 1.8× its width and 0.3× UID.

Pronotum with anterior declivity weakly concave, more differentiated from dorsum than in female; dorsum in dorsal view narrowing anteriorly; shoulder gently rounded; juncture between dorsal and lateral faces roundly raised; posterior margin arcuately emarginate. Parapsidal sulcus finely impressed. Discs of mesoscutellum and metanotum somewhat stronger raised above level of mesoscutum and propodeum than in female. Metapostnotum longer and not deeply sunken between metanotum and propodeum, as in female; somewhat narrowing in middle; metapostnotum length 0.25× metanotum length medially. Propodeum evenly convex with posterior declivity not differentiated from dorsum; posterior surface evenly convex.

Fore wing (Fig. 37). Claws symmetrical with small subapical inner tooth. T1 distinctly petiolate (Fig. 38). S6 deeply and arcuately emarginate posteriorly; lateral hook barely curved and pointed to apex (Fig. 39). Exposed portion of hypopygium stick form, compressed laterally, narrow and widened apically (ventral view); subbasal portion extended laterally, with short stout erect spines on two angulate sublateral carinae (Figs 42, 43). Paramere broadly widened basally and strongly narrowing toward apex (lateral view), with long bristles, longer bristle 0.7× longer than paramere; volsella broad apically (lateral view) (Figs 40, 41).

The female of new species is similar to those of Nipponodipogon kurilensis, N. sudai and N. orientalis sp. n. by having outer apicoventral corner of metafemur produced triangularly (Fig. 30) and T1 petiolate basally (Fig. 28), but can be distinguished from them by following characters: posterolateral portion of propodeum with fine transverse striae and punctures (Figs 27–29) (vs with strong transverse rugae in N. orientalis sp. n. (Figs 5, 7)); mesosoma completely black (Figs 23, 29) (vs completely yellow orange in N. orientalis sp. n. (Figs 1, 7)); T6 matt and shagreened, without distinct setiferous pores (vs somewhat polished, not shagreened, with distinct scattered setiferous pores in N. orientalis sp. n.); vertex between eye tops slightly convex (Fig. 25) (vs distinctly convex in N. kurilensis (Shimizu et al. 2015: fig. 3A)); petiole of T1 long (Fig. 28) (vs very short in N. kurilensis (Shimizu et al. 2015: fig. 3D)); head and mesosoma matt, metasoma somewhat polished (vs head and mesosoma somewhat polished, metasoma distinctly polished in N. kurilensis); mesoscutum raised along midline (Fig. 29) (vs not raised in N. sudai (Shimizu et al. 2015: fig. 8D)); crossvein 3rs-m almost straight (Fig. 31) (vs gently or moderately curved in N. sudai (Shimizu et al. 2015: fig. 9J)); propodeum anteromedially punctate (Fig. 28) (vs not punctate in N. sudai (Fig. 44)).

Male of new species is closely related to that of N. orientalis sp. n. by having some morphological characters including shape of hypopygium and genitalia, but can be easily distinguished in having propodeum without any striae posterolaterally (Fig. 38) (vs with fine transverse striae posterolaterally in N. orientalis sp. n. (Fig. 15)); exposed portion of hypopygium noticeably wider in lateral view (Fig. 43) (vs narrow in N. orientalis sp. n. (Fig. 22); subbasal portion of hypopygium in ventral view with angulate sublateral carina (Fig. 42, arrow) (vs with round sublateral carina in N. orientalis sp. n. (Fig. 21, arrow)); and S6 without setiferous pores posteromedially (Fig. 39) (vs with setiferous pores in N. orientalis sp. n. (Fig. 18)). Male of new species is also similar to that of N. sudai in having petiole in T1 basally (Fig. 38), but can be separated in having F3–F11 not producing triangularly beneath, not forming serrated profile (vsF3–F11 produced triangularly beneath, forming serrated profile in N. sudai); lateral hook on S6 claw-like, weakly curved and pointed to apex (Fig. 39) (vs lateral hook on S6 strongly compressed laterally and thin, subtriangular in profile in N. sudai (Fig. 46)); and exposed portion of hypopygium without long erect setae (Figs 42, 43) (vs with long erect setae in N. sudai (Fig. 48)).

In spite of females and males were collected in different locations (one male in Yunnan and six females in Guangdong), we consider that they are opposite sexes of the same species. Male S6 of new species lacks setiferous pores posteromedially (Fig. 39), which correlates with female S6 of similar condition medially (vs with scattered setiferous pores in male and female of Nipponodipogon orientalis sp. n.).

It is a pleasure to name this species after the well-known taxonomist Dr. Akira Shimizu (Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan).

China (Guangdong, Yunnan).