Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new troglomorphic species of Larca (Pseudoscorpiones, Larcidae) from Colorado
expand article infoMark S. Harvey§, David B. Steinmann|
‡ Western Australian Museum, Welshpool, Australia
§ University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia
| Denver Museum of Nature & Science, Denver, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

A new species of Larca is described from dry habitats in a cave in central Colorado. Like other cave-dwelling species of Larca, the new species Larca boulderica sp. nov., shows relatively modest morphological adaptations, such as pale colouration and slightly elongated appendages, compared with their epigean counterparts. This species is the sixth cave-dwelling species of Larca described from North America and, like other cave-dwelling Larca in North America and Europe, tends to be distributed in more southerly regions.

Key words

morphology, Nearctic, new species, pseudoscorpion, taxonomy, troglomorphic

Introduction

The pseudoscorpion family Larcidae consists of only 15 species found throughout Europe and North America. Although the family was traditionally divided into two genera with Larca Chamberlin, 1930 distinguished from Archeolarca Hoff & Clawson, 1952 only in the number of trichobothria on the movable chelal finger (Larca with 2 or 3 trichobothria and Archeolarca with 4 trichobothria), these genera were regarded as synonyms by Harvey and Wynne (2014). The European fauna consists of L. bosselaersi Henderickx & Vets, 2002, L. fortunata Zaragoza, 2005, L. hispanica Beier, 1939, L. italica Gardini, 1983, L. lata (Hansen, 1884) and L. lucentina Zaragoza, 2005, and the North American fauna consists of L. aalbui (Muchmore, 1984), L. cavicola (Muchmore, 1981), L. chamberlini Benedict & Malcolm, 1978, L. granulata (Banks, 1891), L. guadalupensis (Muchmore, 1981), L. laceyi Muchmore, 1981, L. notha Hoff, 1961, L. rotunda (Hoff & Clawson, 1952) and L. welbourni (Muchmore, 1981).

Larca was originally treated as a member of the family Garypidae by Chamberlin (1930) until both it and Archeolarca Hoff & Clawson, 1952 were transferred to their own family by Harvey (1992). A recent phylogenomic study found that Larcidae are sister to Garypinidae, and that they belong to their own superfamily, Garypinoidea, which in turn is sister to a larger clade of Cheiridioidea + Sternophoroidea + Cheliferoidea (Benavides et al. 2019). A multi-gene analysis of larcids and garypinids found that Larca nested within Garypinidae (Harvey 2023).

Among some recently collected cave-dwelling pseudoscorpions from Colorado were specimens of Larcidae that differed in several ways from other species of Larca. That species is described here.

Materials and methods

The specimens examined for this study are lodged in the Denver Museum of Nature & Science, Colorado (DMNS) and the Western Australian Museum, Perth (WAM). They were studied using temporary slide mounts prepared by immersion of the specimens in lactic acid at room temperature for several hours, and mounting them on microscope slides with a 10 mm coverslip supported by small sections of 0.25 mm diameter nylon fishing line. After the study, the specimens were rinsed in water and returned to 75% ethanol with the dissected portions placed in 12 × 3 mm glass genitalia microvials (BioQuip Products, Inc.). The specimens were examined with a Leica MZ16 A dissecting microscope and an Olympus BH2 compound microscope, and illustrated with the aid of a drawing tube attached to the compound microscope. Measurements were taken at the highest possible magnification using an ocular graticule.

Terminology and mensuration mostly follow Chamberlin (1931), with the exception of the nomenclature of the pedipalps, legs and some minor modifications to the terminology of the trichobothria (Harvey 1992), chelicera (Judson 2007) and faces of the appendages (Harvey et al. 2012).

Ecology

The type locality, Mallory Cave, is at the eastern edge of the Rocky Mountains in the foothills of Boulder County, Colorado (Fig. 1). The cave is on Dinosaur Mountain to the west of City of Boulder on City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks land. Mallory Cave formed in the Fountain Formation which is a sandstone conglomerate that was deposited approximately 280 Ma during the Pennsylvanian Period (Evanoff and Hirschfeld 2016).

Figure 1. 

The foothills of Boulder where Mallory Cave is located.

Mallory Cave consists of one large room 25 m wide by 7 m deep with a single walk-in entrance that faces east. The temperature inside is 55 °F (13 °C). The cave is gated to protect a maternity colony of Townsend’s big-eared bats (Corynorhinus townsendii Cooper, 1837). There were less than 10 bats roosting in Mallory Cave in 2008 and 2009. Over 60 Townsend’s big-eared bats were documented roosting in the cave in 2023 (B. Stoner, personal communication, 20 March 2024). The cave was gated in 2011 which limited human disturbances to the bats and helped the bat colony increase in size. The Larca specimens were collected in the fall of 2008 and 2009 after the bats left the cave for the winter and no guano was observed.

The Larca specimens were found among the remnants of packrat nests and under rocks in arid and dusty areas in the dark zone of the cave. They were clustered in groups of 4–10 individuals. Mallory Cave is dry in the southern section where the Larca specimens were collected. The western and northern sections of the cave have ceiling drips, wet seeping walls, and a moist floor further inside.

Packrats that use Mallory Cave are bushy-tailed woodrats (Neotoma cinerea) which is the only packrat species known from Boulder County (Armstrong et al. 2011). The packrat nest remnants were 3–5 cm deep and 30 cm in diameter consisting of scattered debris from abandoned nests. The nest remnants were visually searched for invertebrates. They contained leaves, sticks, pine cones, grasses and fresh packrat scat. Tweezers were used to move the nesting materials around while looking for invertebrates. There are no large packrat middens in the cave. No packrats were observed, and no lice or fleas were seen in the packrat nest remnants.

There are a few smaller caves located near Mallory Cave that were not searched for invertebrates, including Harmon Cave and Bear Cave, which could harbour populations of L. boulderica sp. nov. Deep cracks in the local rock formations, plus nearby boulder talus fields and packrat nests, may also provide habitat for L. boulderica.

Other invertebrates living in Mallory Cave include springtails, harvestmen, spiders, flies, beetles, centipedes and mites. No fleas or lice, which can be associated with rodents, were observed in the cave. Mice (Peromyscus sp.) may enter Mallory Cave, though no evidence of mice, including mouse scat or nests, was seen. Guano from Townsend’s big-eared bats provide organic nutrient input for the invertebrates inhabiting the cave.

Biogeography

With the description of Larca boulderica, the North American larcid fauna now comprises 10 species. Four are rather widely distributed in epigean habitats: L. granulata occurs across a wide variety of habitats from the mid-west to New Hampshire (Muchmore 1981; World Pseudoscorpiones Catalog 2023); L. rotunda from New Mexico, Oregon, Utah and Wyoming (e.g., Hoff and Clawson 1952; Muchmore 1981), L. notha in Colorado, Oregon and southern Canada (e.g., Hoff 1961; Benedict and Malcolm 1978; Muchmore 1981), and L. chamberlini in Oregon, California and Mexico (e.g., Benedict and Malcolm 1978; Villegas-Guzmán and Pérez 2005) (Fig. 2). The other six species appear to be obligate cave-dwelling forms with morphological modifications that are indicative of troglomorphic traits. The pedipalps and legs are slightly longer and thinner than their epigean counterparts, they are paler, and the eyes are reduced in size. They appear to represent short-range endemic species with highly restricted distributions: L. aalbui from Mitchell Caverns, California (Muchmore 1984), L. cavicola from Grand Canyon National Park and Parashant National Monument, Arizona (Muchmore 1981; Harvey and Wynne 2014), L. guadalupensis from Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Texas (Muchmore 1981), L. laceyi from Music Hall Cave, California (Muchmore 1981) and L. welbourni from Wupatki National Monument, Arizona (Muchmore 1981) (Fig. 3). There is a single record of L. chamberlini from a cave in Calaveras County, California but Muchmore (1981) surmised that it was only accidentally found in the cave.

Figures 2, 3. 

Distribution of Larca in North America: 2 epigean species 3 cave-dwelling species.

Whereas the epigean species generally occur across a wide range of habitats in North America (Fig. 2), the subterranean species occur in more southerly regions in Arizona (L. cavicola and L. welbourni), California (L. aalbui and L. laceyi), Colorado (L. boulderica) and Texas (L. guadalupensis) (Fig. 3).

A similar pattern occurs in Europe where the widespread species L. lata occurs sporadically throughout northern and central Europe (e.g., Lohmander 1939; Ressl and Beier 1958; Beier 1963; Dumitresco and Orghidan 1964; Ressl 1965; Beier 1970; Andersson et al. 1987; Gärdenfors and Wilander 1992; Drogla and Lippold 1994; Judson and Legg 1996; Ranius and Wilander 2000; Nilsson et al. 2001; Ranius 2001; Tooren 2001; Jansson and Hultengren 2002; Ranius 2002; Ranius and Douwes 2002; Drogla and Lippold 2004; Stol 2005; Petrov and Šťáhlavský 2007; Christophoryová et al. 2011a; Šťáhlavský 2011; Novák 2013) (Fig. 4), and the other five species are each found in one or a few caves in the Mediterranean region: L. bosselaersi from Milatos Cave, Crete (Henderickx and Vets 2002), L. hispanica in eastern Spain (Beier 1939; Estany 1980), L. italica from Grotta San Angelo, Italy (Gardini 1983), L. fortunata from Cueva del Solin, Spain (Zaragoza 2005) and L. lucentina from Sima del Poste, Spain (Zaragoza 2005) (Fig. 5). A cave-dwelling population of Larca has also been recorded from southern France (Leclerc 1979) but its identity has not been ascertained (Judson and Legg 1996).

Figures 4, 5. 

Distribution of Larca in Europe: 4 epigean species 5 cave-dwelling species.

The biogeographic patterns in North America and Europe (Figs 25) are extremely similar, with the epigean species usually occupying northerly habitats, and the hypogean taxa restricted to southern caves. The preponderance of cave-dwelling Larca species at more southerly latitudes in North America (Fig. 3) and Europe (Fig. 5) may be the result of caves becoming refuges for invertebrates where species can adapt to live in isolated subterranean habitats while the surface climate, temperature, and habitat conditions are changing over the millennia. Caves provide relatively stable temperatures and humidities compared to above-ground areas. The Pleistocene Effects Model postulates that wetter conditions during glacial periods of the Pleistocene provide connections between caves with the drier interglacial periods isolating populations and leading to genetic divergence (Barr 1968; Barr and Holsinger 1985; Derkarabetian et al. 2010). Studies of the harvestman Sclerobunus steinmanni Derkarabetian & Hedin, 2014 from Mallory Cave determined that S. steinmanni diverged from its ancestor in the late Miocene (7.2–13.4 Ma) (Derkarabetian et al. 2010). Given that the Mallory Cave harvestmen evolved to inhabit caves for at least 7 million years, it seems possible that L. boulderica began adapting to the cave environment in the order of a million years ago or more.

As noted by Judson and Legg (1996), species of Larca are xerophilic and prefer dry, dusty habitats, including tree hollows, dry caves, mammal and bird nests (Ranius et al. 2010; Turienzo et al. 2010; Christophoryová et al. 2011b; Ranius et al. 2011; Machač et al. 2018). The packrat nest remnants and the rocks where L. boulderica were collected were dry and dusty habitats with no moisture. The nests were on the cave floor and on a small ledge approximately 1.5 m above the floor level. There is moisture from drips and seeps further back in Mallory Cave from where the Larca specimens were collected. No pseudoscorpions were found in the moist parts of the cave.

Morphological variation

Detailed examination of the eight specimens of L. boulderica has revealed significant intra-population variations in characters that are often cited as of inter-specific value in larcid taxonomy. Cheliceral seta sbs was found to be absent in most specimens leading to the presence of only four setae on the cheliceral hand. However, in two specimens, a male and a female, a fifth seta is present on one of the chelicerae. All of the species previously attributed to Archeolarca (L. aalbui, L. cavicola, L. guadalupensis, L. rotunda and L. welbourni from North America) as well as L. chamberlini and L. laceyi from North America and L. bosselaersi from Crete have four setae (Hoff and Clawson 1952; Benedict and Malcolm 1978; Muchmore 1981, 1984; Henderickx and Vets 2002; Harvey and Wynne 2014), and all other species, L. granulata and L. notha from North America and L. fortunata, L. hispanica, L. italica, L. lata and L. lucentina from Europe, usually have the full complement of five setae (Hoff 1961; Muchmore 1981; Gardini 1983; Zaragoza 2005). Zaragoza (2005) reported that specimens of L. bosselaersi have four or five setae on the same specimen, and among a large series of L. hispanica most specimens have five setae on both chelicerae; several have five setae on one chelicera and 6 on the other, and two adults had 6 setae on both chelicerae, leading him to caution against relying on cheliceral setal number to characterise species of Larca. The variation noted in the specimens of L. boulderica lends further support to that advice.

Another variable feature is the number of carapaceal setae. The holotype male of L. boulderica had 25 setae (arranged 6: 8: 7: 4) whereas the other male had 41 setae (10: 17: 8: 6). The four measured females had the following arrangements 6: 10: 7: 3 (= 26), 5: 13: 7: 3 (= 28), 4: 15: 7: 4 (= 30) and 6: 10: 7: 4 (= 24). Zaragoza (2005) reported similar variation in specimens of L. lucentina with most having four setae on the posterior margin of the carapace, but others having three, two or even one seta. Once again, caution must be taken when using this feature to characterise species of Larca.

Taxonomy

Family Larcidae Harvey, 1992

Larca Chamberlin, 1930

Larca Chamberlin, 1930: 616.

Archeolarca Hoff & Clawson, 1952: 2–3.

Type species

Larca: Garypus latus Hansen, 1884, by original designation. Archeolarca: Archeolarca rotunda Hoff & Clawson, 1952, by original designation.

Key to Larca species of North America

1 Movable chelal finger with 4 trichobothria (Figs 14, 15) 2
Movable chelal finger with 2 or 3 trichobothria 7
2 Trichobothrium ist situated midway between ib and isb 3
Trichobothrium ist situated much closer to ib than to isb (Figs 14, 15) 4
3 Chelal hand rounded in outline (dorsal view); trichobothrium st separated by less than one areolar diameter from t L. cavicola (Muchmore, 1981)
Chelal hand less rounded in outline (dorsal view); trichobothrium st separated by at least one areolar diameter from t L. guadalupensis (Muchmore, 1981)
4 Chelal hand rounded in outline (dorsal view) 5
Chelal hand less rounded in outline (dorsal view) (Figs 12, 13) 6
5 Pedipalps larger, e.g., femur 0.90–0.995 (♂), 1.20–1.31 (♀) mm in length L. welbourni (Muchmore, 1981)
Pedipalps smaller, e.g., femur 0.795–0.83 (♂), 0.86–0.91 (♀) mm in length L. rotunda (Hoff & Clawson, 1952)
6 Trichobothrium st situated less than one areolar diameter from t; pedipalpal segments slender, e.g., femur 5.3–5.9 × longer than broad, patella 3.9–4.35 × longer than broad L. aalbui (Muchmore, 1984)
Trichobothrium st situated more than one areolar diameter from t (Figs 14, 15); pedipalpal segments less slender, e.g., femur 4.57–4.59 (♂), 4.07–4.71 (♀) × longer than broad, patella 3.09–3.22 (♂), 3.21–3.32 (♀) × longer than broad (Figs 12, 13) L. boulderica sp. nov.
7 Movable chelal finger with 2 trichobothria; larger species (e.g., pedipalpal femur greater than 0.60 mm in length) 8
Movable chelal finger with 3 trichobothria; smaller species (e.g., pedipalpal femur less than 0.55 mm in length) L. notha Hoff, 1961
8 Cheliceral hand with 5 setae, sbs present L. granulata (Banks, 1891)
Cheliceral hand with 4 setae, sbs absent 9
9 Anterior margin of carapace with 6 setae; larger species (e.g., pedipalpal femur greater than 0.85 mm in length) L. laceyi Muchmore, 1981
Anterior margin of carapace with 8 setae; smaller species (e.g., pedipalpal femur less than 0.80 mm in length) L. chamberlini Benedict & Malcolm, 1978

Larca boulderica sp. nov.

Figs 6, 7–9, 10–18, 19–21

Material examined

Types: U.S.A.: Colorado: Boulder County: holotype male, Mallory Cave, 39°58.45'N, 105°17.37'W, 7000 ft (2140 m) a.s.l., 29 November 2008, under rock, dark zone of cave, D. Steinmann (DMNS). Paratypes: 4 females, collected with holotype (DMNS); 1 male, collected with holotype (WAM T162363); 1 female, same data as holotype except 12 November 2009 (DMNS); 1 female, same data as holotype except 12 November 2009 (WAM T162059).

Diagnosis

Larca boulderica most closely resembles L. aalbui, L. rotunda and L. welbourni as all have four trichobothria on the movable chelal finger (Figs 14, 15) and trichobothrium ist is closer to ib than to isb (Figs 14, 15). The only other species with four trichobothria, L. cavicola and L. guadalupensis, have trichobothrium ist situated midway between ib and isb. Larca rotunda and L. welbourni have a rounded chelal hand, whereas L. aalbui and L. boulderica have a thinner hand (Figs 12, 13). Larca boulderica differs from L. aalbui by the positions of trichobothria st and t (separated by at least one areolar diameter in L. boulderica but by less than one areolar diameter in L. aalbui), and the less slender pedipalpal segments [e.g., 4.57–4.59 (♂), 4.07–4.71 (♀) × and patella 3.09–3.22 (♂), 3.21–3.32 (♀) × longer than broad in L. boulderica (Figs 12, 13); femur 5.3–5.9 × and patella 3.9–4.35 × longer than broad in L. aalbui].

Description

(adults). Colour: most body parts pale yellow-brown, genital region of female and legs slightly paler (Figs 69).

Figure 6. 

Larca boulderica sp. nov., in situ in Mallory Cave.

Figures 7–9. 

Larca boulderica sp. nov., paratype female (DMNS): 7 body, dorsal 8 body, ventral 9 cephalothorax, dorsal. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Setae and cuticle : setae long, usually curved, distally acuminate; most cuticular surfaces granulate.

Chelicera : with 4 (rarely 5) setae on hand, with sbs usually absent, and 1 subdistal seta on movable finger; all setae acuminate; seta bs slightly shorter than others; with 2 dorsal lyrifissures and 1 ventral lyrifissure; galea of ♂ short with terminal bifurcation (Fig. 16), of ♀ long and slender with 3 terminal to subterminal rami (Fig. 17); rallum of 4 blades, the most distal blade with several serrations on leading edge, other blades smooth; serrula exterior with 16 (♂), 18 (♀) blades; lamina exterior present.

Pedipalps : Pedipalp (Figs 12, 13): most surfaces of trochanter, femur, patella and chelal hand lightly and granulate, chelal fingers smooth; trochanter, femur, patella and chelal hand with prominent, curved, slightly denticulate setae arranged sparsely; patella with 3 small sub-basal lyrifissures; trochanter 1.85 (♂), 1.79 (♀), femur 4.57–4.59 (♂), 4.07–4.71 (♀), patella 3.09–3.22 (♂), 3.21–3.32 (♀), chela (with pedicel) 4.36–5.00 (♂), 3.83–4.03 (♀), chela (without pedicel) 4.09–4.78 (♂), 3.60–3.81 (♀), hand (with pedicel) 2.09–2.33 (♂), 1.83–1.87 (♀) × longer than broad, movable finger (with pedicel) 0.96–1.05 (♂), 0.97–1.03 (♀) × longer than hand. Fixed chelal finger with 8 trichobothria, movable chelal finger with 4 trichobothria (Figs 14, 15): eb, esb, ib and ist situated subbasally, est, isb and it submedially, et subdistally, est slightly distal to it, ib opposite esb, and ist distal to esb; b and sb situated subbasally, and st and t situated submedially, with st situated very close to t, separated by slightly more than 1 areolar diameter; patch of microsetae not present on retrolateral margin of fixed chelal finger near et. Venom apparatus present in both chelal fingers, venom ducts not visible. Chelal teeth rounded, very low; fixed finger with 30 (♂), 30 (♀) teeth; movable finger with 29 (♂), 28 (♀) teeth; accessory teeth absent.

Cephalothorax : carapace (Figs 9, 10): 0.73–0.75 (♂), 0.79–0.83 (♀) × longer than broad; anterior margin straight; with 2 pairs of rounded corneate eyes, tapetum present; with 25–41 (♂), 24–30 (♀) setae, arranged with 6–8 (♂), 4–6 (♀) near anterior margin, 8–17 (♂), 10–15 (♀) in prozone, 7–8 (♂), 7 (♀) in metazone and 4–6 (♂), 3–4 (♀) near posterior margin; with 1 deep, broad median furrow. Coxal region: manducatory process rounded with 1 distal seta, 1 small sub-oral seta, and 12 (♂), 9 (♀) additional setae; median maxillary lyrifissure large, rounded and situated submedially; posterior maxillary lyrifissure rounded. Coxae I to IV becoming progressively wider. Chaetotaxy of coxae I–IV: ♂, 8: 8: 8: 12; ♀, 8: 8: 7: 11.

Legs : femora I and II longer than patellae; junction between femora and patellae III and IV very angulate; femora III and IV much smaller than patellae III and IV; femur + patella of leg IV 5.21 (♂), 4.81 (♀) × longer than broad (Fig. 18); metatarsi and tarsi not fused; tarsus IV without tactile seta; subterminal tarsal setae arcuate and acuminate; claws simple; arolium much longer than claws, not divided.

Figures 10–18. 

Larca boulderica sp. nov., holotype male and paratype female (DMNS): 10 carapace, dorsal, male 11 left pair of eyes, dorsal, male 12 right pedipalp, dorsal, male 13 right pedipalp, dorsal, male 14 left chela, retrolateral, male 15 left chela, retrolateral, female 16 left galea, dorsal, male 17 left galea, ventral, female 18 left leg IV, retrolateral, male. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (12, 13); 0.25 mm (10, 14, 15, 18); 0.1 mm (11); 0.05 mm (16, 17).

Abdomen : tergites II–VIII and sternites IV–VIII of male and female with medial suture line fully dividing each sclerite. Tergal chaetotaxy: ♂, 7: 8: 8: 11: 11: 11: 11: 10: 6: 6 (arranged T4T): 6: 2; ♀, 4: 6: 10: 11: 12: 11: 12: 11: 10: 8 (arranged T6T): 4: 2; tergites I–X uniseriate. Sternal chaetotaxy: ♂, 22: (0) 7 [3 + 3] (0): (0) 21 (0): 8: 9: 8: 8: 6: 6: 4: 2; ♀, 13: (0) 12 (0): (0) 7 (0): 8: 7: 8: 9: 7: 6: 4: 2; sternites IV–X uniseriate; ♂ and ♀ sternite II with all setae situated near posterior margin (Figs 19, 20); most setae of male sternite III clustered near posterior margin (Fig. 19). Spiracles with helix. Anal plates (tergite XII and sternite XII) situated between tergite XI and sternite XI, and surrounded by desclerotized region of tergite XI and sternite XI; sternite XI with 26 (♂), 22 (♀) small lyrifissures. Pleural membrane finely wrinkled-plicate; without any setae.

Genitalia : male: very similar to that described for L. laceyi Muchmore, 1981 by Muchmore (1981). Female with 1 pair of lateral cribriform plates and 2 median cribriform plates, one of which is larger than the other (Fig. 21); spermathecae absent.

Figures 19–21. 

Larca boulderica sp. nov., holotype male and paratype female (DMNS): 19 genital sternites, ventral, male 20 genital sternites, ventral, female 21 genitalia, ventral, female. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Dimensions (mm): Male: holotype, with 1 other male in parentheses (when measured): Body length (excluding chelicerae) 2.37 (2.25). Pedipalp: trochanter 0.370/0.200, femur 0.895/0.195 (0.845/0.185), patella 0.725/0.225 (0.650/0.210), chela (with pedicel) 1.200/0.275 (1.225/0.245), chela (without pedicel) length 1.200 (1.170), chelal hand (without pedicel) length 0.575 (0.570), movable finger length 0.550 (0.600). Carapace 0.640/0.850 (0.580/0.800), anterior eye diameter 0.055, posterior eye diameter 0.050. Leg IV: femur + patella 0.730/0.140, tibia 0.530/0.100, metatarsus 0.265/0.065, tarsus 0.250/0.055.

Female: paratype, with 3 other females in parentheses (when measured): Body length (excluding chelicerae) 2.51 (2.51–2.74). Pedipalp: trochanter 0.375/0.210, femur 0.895/0.205 (0.895–0.990/0.205–0.220), patella 0.755/0.235 (0.765–0.795/0.230–0.240), chela (with pedicel) 1.205/0.315 (1.190–1.255/0.295–0.325), chela (without pedicel) length 1.135 (1.125–1.255), chelal hand (without pedicel) length 0.575 (0.550–0.595), movable finger length 0.565 (0.565–0.575). Carapace 0.640/0.815 (0.645–0.655/0.805–0.815), anterior eye diameter 0.065, posterior eye diameter 0.060. Leg IV: femur + patella 0.745/0.155, tibia 0.530/0.095, metatarsus 0.270/0.065, tarsus 0.250/0.055.

Etymology

The species epithet is a noun taken from the type locality of Boulder County, Colorado. Mallory Cave is situated on City of Boulder, Open Space and Mountain Parks property.

Acknowledgments

We thank the City of Boulder, Open Space and Mountain Parks Department for permission to collect at Mallory Cave. Don D’Amico, Chris Wanner, Burton Stoner, and Christian Nunes from the City of Boulder assisted with collection permits and accessing the cave. Deborah and Nathan Steinmann are thanked for helping collect the new Larca species from Mallory Cave. We also thank staff from DMNS for loaning the specimens, and Dr Paula Cushing for permission to retain specimens in WAM. We thank reviewers, in particular Dr Charles Stephen, for their comments on the manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: MSH, DBS. Writing - original draft: MSH. Writing - review and editing: DBS.

Author ORCIDs

Mark S. Harvey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-0109

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Andersson H, Coulianos C-C, Ehnström B, Hammarstedt O, Imby L, Janzon L-Å, Lindelöw Å, Waldén HW (1987) Hotade evertebrater i Sverige. Entomologisk Tidskrift 108: 65–75.
  • Armstrong DM, Fitzgerald JP, Meaney CA (2011) Mammals of Colorado. 2nd edn. [Denver]: Boulder, Colo., Denver Museum of Nature & Science.
  • Barr Jr TC (1968) Cave ecology and the evolution of troglobites. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht MK, Steere WC (Eds) Evolutionary Biology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 35–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8094-8_2
  • Beier M (1939) Die Pseudoscorpioniden-Fauna der iberischen Halbinsel. Zoologische Jahrbucher. Abteilung fur Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere 72: 157–202.
  • Beier M (1970) Reliktformen in der Pseudoscorpioniden-Fauna Europas. Memorie della Societa Entomologica Italiana 48: 317–323.
  • Benavides LR, Cosgrove JG, Harvey MS, Giribet G (2019) Phylogenomic interrogation resolves the backbone of the Pseudoscorpiones Tree of Life. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 139: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.05.023
  • Benedict EM, Malcolm DR (1978) Some garypoid false scorpions from western North America (Pseudoscorpionida: Garypidae and Olpiidae). The Journal of Arachnology 5: 113–132.
  • Zaragoza JA (2005) Two new cave-dwelling Larca species from the south-east of Spain (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones, Larcidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 112: 195–213. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.80295
  • Chamberlin JC (1930) A synoptic classification of the false scorpions or chela-spinners, with a report on a cosmopolitan collection of the same. Part II. The Diplosphyronida (Arachnida-Chelonethida). Annals and Magazine of Natural History 5(30): 585–620 [1–48]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933008673173
  • Chamberlin JC (1931) The arachnid order Chelonethida. Stanford University Publications, Biological Sciences 7: 1–284.
  • Christophoryová J, Fenďa P, Krištofík J (2011a) Chthonius hungaricus and Larca lata new to the fauna of Slovakia (Pseudoscorpiones: Chthoniidae, Larcidae). Arachnologische Mitteilungen 41: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit4101
  • Christophoryová J, Krumpálova Z, Krištofík J, Országhová Z (2011b) Association of pseudoscorpions with different types of bird nests. Biologia 66(4): 669–677. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0072-8
  • Derkarabetian S, Steinmann DB, Hedin M (2010) Repeated and time-correlated morphological convergence in cave-dwelling harvestmen (Opiliones, Laniatores) from montane western North America. PLoS ONE 5: e10388. hbarrttps://https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010388.
  • Drogla R, Lippold K (1994) Neunachweise von Pseudoskorpionen in den neuen Bundesländern Deutschlands (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones). Arachnologische Mitteilungen 8: 75–76. https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit0815
  • Drogla R, Lippold K (2004) Zur Kenntnis der pseudoskorpion-fauna von Ostdeutschland (Arachnida, Pseudoscorpiones). Arachnologische Mitteilungen 27–28: 1–54. https://doi.org/10.5431/aramit2701
  • Dumitresco M, Orghidan T (1964) Contribution a la connaissance des Pseudoscorpions de la Dobroudja. 1re note. Annales de Spéléologie 19: 599–630.
  • Tooren Dvd (2001) First record of the pseudoscorpion Larca lata in the Netherlands (Pseudoscorpiones: Garypoidea: Larcidae). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen 15: 33–39. https://repository.naturalis.nl/pub/218637
  • Estany J (1980) Quelques remarques à propos de Larca hispanica Beier et Larca spelaea Beier (Pseudoscorpionida, Garypidae). In: Rambla M (Ed.) Comptes Rendus Vème Colloque d’Arachnologie d’Expression Française, Barcelona. Eunibar, Barcelona, 65–70.
  • Evanoff E, Hirschfeld SE (2016) The Geology Along the Trails West of NCAR. Colorado Scientific Society, 19 pp.
  • Gärdenfors U, Wilander P (1992) Sveriges klokrypare med nyckel till arterna. Entomologisk Tidskrift 113: 20–35.
  • Gardini G (1983) Larca italica n. sp. cavernicola dell’Appennino Abruzzese (Pseudoscorpionida, Garypidae) (Pseudoscorpioni d’Italia XV). Bollettino della Società Entomologica Italiana 115: 63–69.
  • Harvey MS (1992) The phylogeny and classification of the Pseudoscorpionida (Chelicerata: Arachnida). Invertebrate Systematics 6(6): 1373–1435. https://doi.org/10.1071/IT9921373
  • Harvey MS (2023) A preliminary phylogeny for the pseudoscorpion family Garypinidae (Pseudoscorpiones: Garypinoidea), with new taxa and remarks on the Australasian fauna. Invertebrate Systematics 37(9): 623–676. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS23029
  • Harvey MS, Wynne JJ (2014) Troglomorphic pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) of northern Arizona, with the description of two new short-range endemic species. The Journal of Arachnology 42(3): 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1636/K14-34.1
  • Harvey MS, Ratnaweera PB, Udagama PV, Wijesinghe MR (2012) A new species of the pseudoscorpion genus Megachernes (Pseudoscorpiones: Chernetidae) associated with a threatened Sri Lankan rainforest rodent, with a review of host associations of Megachernes. Journal of Natural History 46(41–42): 2519–2535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2012.707251
  • Henderickx H, Vets V (2002) A new Larca (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones: Larcidae) from Crete. Bulletin - British Arachnological Society 12: 280–282.
  • Hoff CC (1961) Pseudoscorpions from Colorado. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 122: 409–464.
  • Jansson N, Hultengren S (2002) Oaks, lichens and beetles on Moricsala Island in Latvia - an ecological approach. Vol. Rapport 2002–2, Miljövårdsenheten, Länsstyrelsen i Östergötland, 43 pp. + 17 unpaginated appendices pp.
  • Judson MLI (2007) A new and endangered species of the pseudoscorpion genus Lagynochthonius from a cave in Vietnam, with notes on chelal morphology and the composition of the Tyrannochthoniini (Arachnida, Chelonethi, Chthoniidae). Zootaxa 1627(1): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1627.1.4
  • Judson MLI, Legg G (1996) Discovery of the pseudoscorpion Larca lata (Garypoidea, Larcidae) in Britain. Bulletin - British Arachnological Society 10: 205–210.
  • Leclerc P (1979) Les phénomènes de spéciation chez les Pseudoscorpions cavernicoles des karsts de la bordure orientale des Cévennes. Paris: Université de Paris VII, pp.
  • Lohmander H (1939) Zur Kenntnis der Pseudoskorpionfauna Schwedens. Entomologisk Tidskrift 60: 279–323.
  • Machač O, Christophoryová J, Krajčovičová K, Budka J, Schlaghamersky J (2018) Spiders and pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Araneae, Pseudoscorpiones) in old oaks of a Central European floodplain. Arachnologische Mitteilungen 56(1): 24–31. https://doi.org/10.30963/aramit5604
  • Muchmore WB (1981) Cavernicolous species of Larca, Archeolarca and Pseudogarypus with notes on the genera, (Pseudoscorpionida, Garypidae and Pseudogarypidae). The Journal of Arachnology 9: 47–60.
  • Muchmore WB (1984) New cavernicolous pseudoscorpions from California (Pseudoscorpionida, Chthoniidae and Garypidae). The Journal of Arachnology 12: 171–175.
  • Petrov BP, Šťáhlavský F (2007) New species of pseudoscorpions (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) for the fauna of Bulgaria. Historia Naturalis Bulgarica 18: 15–27.
  • Ranius T (2001) Populationsekologi och habitatkrav för skalbaggar och klokrypare i ihåliga ekar. Entomologisk Tidskrift 122: 137–149.
  • Ranius T (2002) Population ecology and conservation of beetles and pseudoscorpions living in hollow oaks in Sweden. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 25: 53–68.
  • Ranius T, Douwes P (2002) Genetic structure of two pseudoscorpion species living in tree hollows in Sweden. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 25: 67–74.
  • Ranius T, Wilander P (2000) Occurrence of Larca lata H.J. Hansen (Pseudoscorpionida: Garypidae) and Allochernes wideri C.L. Koch (Pseudoscorpionida: Chernetidae) in tree hollows in relation to habitat quality and density. Journal of Insect Conservation 4(1): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009682722905
  • Ranius T, Johansson V, Fahrig L (2011) Predicting spatial occurrence of beetles and pseudoscorpions in hollow oaks in southeastern Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation 20(9): 2027–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0072-6
  • Ressl F (1965) Über Verbreitung, Variabilität und Lebensweise einiger österreichischer Afterskorpione. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 12(4–5): 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.19650120402
  • Ressl F, Beier M (1958) Zur Ökologie, Biologie und Phänologie der heimischen Pseudoskorpione. Zoologische Jahrbucher. Abteilung fur Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere 86: 1–26.
  • Šťáhlavský F (2011) Štírci (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpiones) CHKO Třeboňsko a okolí. Klapalekiana 47: 247–258.
  • Villegas-Guzmán GA, Pérez TM (2005) Pseudoescorpiones (Arachnida: Pseudoscorpionida) asociados a nidos de ratas del género Neotoma (Mammalia: Rodentia) del Altiplano Mexicano. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 21(2): 63–77. https://doi.org/10.21829/azm.2005.2121985
login to comment