Research Article
Print
Research Article
Three new species of the planthopper genus Oecleopsis Emeljanov, 1971 from China (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Cixiidae)
expand article infoSha-Sha Lv, Lin Yang, Yu-Bo Zhang§, Yan Zhi|, Pei Zhang, Xiang-Sheng Chen
‡ Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
§ Anshun University, Anshun, China
| Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
¶ Xingyi Normal University for Nationalities, Xingyi, China
Open Access

Abstract

Three new species of the genus Oecleopsis Emeljanov, 1971 from China, O. acerbus Lv & Chen, sp. nov. and O. panxianensis Lv & Chen, sp. nov. from Guizhou Province, and O. digitatus Lv & Chen, sp. nov. from Sichuan Province, are described and illustrated. With these additions, the number of species in the genus is increased to 18. An updated identification key and checklist of all known species of Oecleopsis are provided as well as a map of their geographic distributions.

Key words

Distribution, Fulgoroidea, morphology, Pentastirini, taxonomy

Introduction

Emeljanov (1971) established the planthopper genus Oecleopsis with the type species Oecleopsis artemisiae (Matsumura, 1914) and transferred O. cucullatus (Noualhier, 1896) from the genus Oliarus Stål, 1862 into the genus Oecleopsis. This genus belongs to the tribe Pentastirini of the subfamily Cixiinae (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Cixiidae) (Emeljanov 1971; Bourgoin 2023). Van Stalle (1991) described O. articara Van Stalle, 1991, and transferred the following seven species from Oliarus Stål, 1862 to Oecleopsis: O. petasatus (Noualhier, 1896), O. mori (Matsumura, 1914), O. sinicus (Jacobi, 1944), O. yoshikawai (Ishihara, 1961), O. bifidus (Tsaur, Hsu & Van Stalle, 1988), O. chiangi (Tsaur, Hsu & Van Stalle, 1988), and O. elevatus (Tsaur, Hsu & Van Stalle, 1988). Guo et al. (2009) reviewed the genus and described three new species from China, O. spinosus Guo, Wang & Feng, 2009, O. tiantaiensis Guo, Wang & Feng, 2009, and O. wuyiensis Guo, Wang & Feng, 2009. Zhi et al. (2018) described two new species from China, O. laminatus Zhi & Chen, 2018 and O. productus Zhi & Chen, 2018. Until now, 15 species have been recorded in the genus, which are widely distributed in the Palaearctic (China, Japan, Russia, and Korea) and Oriental (China, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand) regions (Holt et al. 2013; Bourgoin 2023).

Herein, three new species from China, O. acerbus Lv & Chen sp. nov., O. panxianensis Lv & Chen, sp. nov. and O. digitatus Lv & Chen, sp. nov., are described and illustrated. Hence, the species number of Oecleopsis is raised to 18. All Oecleopsis species are recorded from China (Guo et al. 2009; Zhi et al. 2018; Luo et al. 2022; Bourgoin 2023).

Material and methods

The external morphology terminologies are as follows: male genitalia follows Bourgoin (1987), female genitalia follows Bourgoin (1993), and wing venation follows Bourgoin et al. (2015). Body measurements are from apex of vertex to tip of forewing; vertex length was measured the median length of vertex (from apical transverse carina to tip of basal emargination). All measurements are in millimeters (mm). External morphology and drawings were done under the Leica MZ 12.5 stereomicroscope. Photographs were taken with NIKON SMZ 25 and VHX-1000E digital camera. Illustrations were scanned with CanoScan LiDE 200 and imported into Adobe Photoshop 7.0 for labeling and plate composition. The dissected male and female genitalia are preserved in glycerin in small plastic tubes pinned together with the specimens. The distribution map was generated with ARCGIS 10.7.

The type specimens examined are deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China (IEGU).

Results

Taxonomy

Class Insecta Linnaeus, 1758

Order Hemiptera Linnaeus, 1758

Infraorder Fulgoromorpha Evans, 1946

Family Cixiidae Spinola, 1839

Subfamily Cixiinae Spinola, 1839

Tribe Pentastirini Emeljanov, 1971

Oecleopsis Emeljanov, 1971

Oecleopsis Emeljanov, 1971: 621; Anufriev and Emeljanov 1988: 460; Van Stalle 1991: 20; Guo et al. 2009: 46; Zhi et al. 2018: 3.

Type species

Oliarus artemisiae Matsumura, 1914, original designation.

Diagnosis

For the diagnosis of Oecleopsis see Van Stalle (1991: 20) and Guo et al. (2009: 46).

Distribution

China, Japan, Korea, Russia, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Cambodia (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Geographic distributions of Oecleopsis species.

Checklist and distributions of species of Oecleopsis Emeljanov, 1971

O. artemisiae (Matsumura, 1914); China (Sichuan Province), Japan (Chishima, Hokkaido, Honshu, Kyushu, Shikoku, Tsushima Islands), Korea, Russia (Kunashir Island).

O. articara Van Stalle, 1991; China (Hainan, Henan, Sichuan, Guizhou Provinces), Indonesia (Borneo State), Malaysia (Borneo, Pahang States).

O. bifidus (Tsaur, Hsu & Van Stalle, 1988); China (Fujian, Taiwan Provinces).

O. chiangi (Tsaur, Hsu & Van Stalle, 1988); China (Fujian, Taiwan Provinces).

O. cucullatus (Noualhier, 1896); China (Guangdong, Hubei Provinces), Cambodia.

O. elevatus (Tsaur, Hsu & Van Stalle, 1988); China (Guizhou, Taiwan Provinces, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region), Japan (Honshu Island).

O. laminatus Zhi & Chen, 2018; China (Yunnan Province).

O. mori (Matsumura, 1914); China (Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Yunnan, Taiwan Provinces).

O. petasatus (Noualhier, 1896); China (Hainan, Sichuan, Yunnan Provinces), Cambodia.

O. productus Zhi & Chen, 2018; China (Yunnan Province).

O. sinicus (Jacobi, 1944); China (Anhui, Beijing, Fujian, Guangdong, Guizhou, Hubei, Henan, Hunan, Shanxi, Sichuan, Zhejiang, Taiwan Provinces, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region), Cambodia, Japan (Kyushu Island).

O. spinosus Guo, Wang & Feng, 2009; China (Shaanxi Province).

O. tiantaiensis Guo, Wang & Feng, 2009; China (Gansu, Shaanxi Provinces).

O. wuyiensis Guo, Wang & Feng, 2009; China (Fujian, Henan, Hunan, Shaanxi, Yunnan Provinces).

O. yoshikawai (Ishihara, 1961); China (Guizhou, Yunnan Provinces), Thailand (Doi Inthanon National Park).

O. acerbus Lv & Chen sp. nov.; China (Guizhou Province).

O. panxianensis Lv & Chen sp. nov.; China (Guizhou Province).

O. digitatus Lv & Chen sp. nov.; China (Sichuan Province).

Key to species of Oecleopsis Emeljanov, 1971

1 Vertex at least three times as long as broad 2
Vertex less than three times as long as broad 6
2 Apex of endosoma circular 3
Apex of endosoma not circular 4
3 Left side near apex of periandrium with a short spinose process; dorsal margin of endosoma with a long spinose process and left side with a short process (Zhi et al. 2018: figs 31–34) O. productus
Left side of periandrium without spinose process; dorsal margin of endosoma without process and left side with a long process (Van Stalle 1991: fig. 79) O. articara
4 Aedeagus with four processes in total (Van Stalle 1991: fig. 72) O. petasatus
Aedeagus with three processes in total 5
5 Apical process of endosoma bifurcated at basal part, rami long (Fig. 3K–N) O. panxianensis sp. nov.
Apical process of endosoma bifurcated at apical part, rami short relatively (Zhi et al. 2018: figs 17–20) O. laminatus
6 Apical process of endosoma not bifurcated 7
Apical process of endosoma bifurcated 10
7 Apex of endosoma with four processes (Tsaur et al. 1988: fig. 10F, G) O. elevatus
Apex of endosoma without four processes 8
8 Left side of periandrium at apex of aedeagus with a short spine (Zhi et al. 2018: fig. 46) O. yoshikawai
Left side of periandrium at apex of aedeagus without a spine 9
9 Periandrium with a moderately long spine, situated on right-dorsal margin, directed dorsocephalad (Tsaur et al. 1988: fig. 8C, D) O. chiangi
Periandrium with a short spine, situated on right side of periandrium at apex of aedeagus, directed ventrad (Guo et al. 2009: figs 10, 11) O. spinosus
10 Rami of bifurcation symmetrical, almost equal in length 11
Rami of bifurcation asymmetrical, unequal in length 13
11 Endosoma with one subapical process (Tsaur et al. 1988: fig. 9C, D) O. bifidus
Endosoma with two subapical processes 12
12 Spine on right side of periandrium at apex of aedeagus very long and slender (Anufriev and Emeljanov 1988: fig. 358; Van Stalle 1991: fig. 101) O. artemisiae
Spine on right side of periandrium at apex of aedeagus very short, basal part wide (Van Stalle 1991: fig. 92) O. sinicus
13 Left ramus of bifurcation rudimentary, only a small protuberance (Guo et al. 2009: figs 20, 21) O. tiantaiensis
Left ramus of bifurcation well developed 14
14 Length of right ramus of bifurcation about three times as long as that of left ramus (Van Stalle 1991: fig. 85) O. mori
Length of right ramus of bifurcation less than three times as long as that of left ramus 15
15 Ventral margin near base of periandrium with a spinose process (Guo et al. 2009: figs 31, 32) O. wuyiensis
Ventral margin near base of periandrium without a spinose process 16
16 Dorsal process of endosoma suddenly narrowed at middle part, long, needle-shaped (Fennah 1956: fig. 3 G) O. cucullatus
Dorsal process of endosoma not suddenly narrowed at middle part, not long and needle-shaped 17
17 Dorsal process of endosoma directed ventrocephalad, lateral margins straight; ventral process constricted in the middle, curved ventrocephalad on left side (Fig. 2K–N) O. acerbus sp. nov.
Dorsal process of endosoma directed dorsocephalad, lateral margins slightly curved; ventral process smoothly tapering at end, curved ventrad on left side (Fig. 4K–N) O. digitatus sp. nov.

Oecleopsis acerbus Lv & Chen, sp. nov.

Figs 2A–N, 5A–C

Type materials

Holotype : China • ♂; Guizhou Province, Yanhe County, Xinjing Town; 28°53'N, 108°17'E; sweeping, 7 June 2007; Pei Zhang leg.; IEGU. Paratypes: 7♂♂, 3♀♀; China • Guizhou Province, Yanhe County, Xinjing Town; 28°53'N, 108°17'E; sweeping, 7 June 2007; Zheng-Guang Zhang & Pei Zhang leg.; IEGU.

Diagnosis

The salient features of the new species include: vertex (Fig. 2A, C) less than three times as long as broad; spinose process near apex of periandrium on right side (Fig. 2K) short, nib-like; left side (Fig. 2L) apical process of endosoma bifurcated, rami of bifurcation asymmetrical; two subapical spines, dorsal process long and tapering to apex, lateral margins straight, ventral process constricted in the middle.

Figure 2. 

A–N Oecleopsis acerbus sp. nov., male A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, lateral view C head and thorax, dorsal view D frons, ventral view E forewing F male terminalia, lateral view G gonostyli, inner lateral view H pygofer and gonostyli, ventral view I anal segment, dorsal view J anal segment, right lateral view K aedeagus, right side L aedeagus, left side M aedeagus, dorsal view N aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Measurements

Total length: male 7.20–7.76 mm (n = 8), female 7.61–8.05 mm (n = 3).

Description

Coloration. General color grayish brown (Fig. 2A, B). Vertex blackish brown. Eyes yellowish brown, ocelli yellowish. Frons yellowish to blackish brown, carinae lighter; rostrum blackish brown. Pronotum blackish brown with carinae yellowish or light brown. Mesonotum blackish brown, carinae brown. Forewings semitranslucent, light grayish brown, distal part with several small patches, stigma yellowish brown. Hindwings semitransparent. Abdomen yellowish brown.

Head and thorax. Vertex (Fig. 2A, C) narrow, 2.36 times longer than wide. Frons (Fig. 1D) with distinct median carina, longer in middle line than wide at widest portion (about 1.33:1). Clypeus (Fig. 2D) with distinct median and lateral carinae. Rostrum elongate, surpassing hind-coxae. Pronotum (Fig. 2C) wider than maximum width of head (including eyes) (1.30:1), lateral and median carinae present. Mesonotum (Fig. 2C) about 6.41 times longer than pronotum in midline, with 5 carinae, distal part of median carina blurry. Forewings (Fig. 2E) slender, longer than maximal width (2.85:1), with 12 apical and 6 subapical cells; fork ScP+R distal to fork CuA1+CuA2; RP 3 branches, MP1+2 3 branches, and MP3+4 2 branches.

Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 2F, H) symmetrical, in lateral view, lateral lobes triangularly extended caudally; in ventral view, dorsal margin concave and U-shaped. Medioventral process triangular in ventral view. Anal segment (Fig. 2F, I, J) tubular, asymmetrical, widened towards apex in left side view; in right side view, left ventral margin convex and right ventral margin excavated near apex; 1.55 times longer than wide in dorsal view; anal style finger-like, beyond anal tube. Aedeagus (Fig. 2K–N) in total with 4 processes; spinose process near apex of periandrium on right side short relatively, nib-like, directed right-dorsocephalad, only a quarter length of periandrium; left side apical process of endosoma bifurcated, curved outward, rami of bifurcation asymmetrical, dorsal ramus longer and thicker, ventral ramus slender and shorter; 2 subapical spines, dorsal process long and tapering to apex, lateral margins straight, directed ventrocephalad; ventral process constricted in the middle, curved ventrocephalad. Gonostyli (Fig. 2F–H) slender, curved apically, tapering into a process, T-shaped in ventral view.

Female terminalia. Terminalia as shown in Fig. 5A ventrally. Anal segment (Fig. 5C) 1.79 times longer than wide in dorsal view. Posterior vagina (Fig. 5B) elongate, with 4 sclerites in total, dorsal sclerite tapering at the end, median and ventral sclerites long, oval and trapezoidal, respectively, left side of terminal sclerite twist into angular process with straight lateral margins.

Distribution

China (Guizhou) (Fig. 1).

Etymology

The species name is derived from the Latin adjective “acerbus”, referring to dorsal process of the endosoma which is pointed on the left side.

Remarks

This species is similar to Oecleopsis wuyiensis Guo, Wang & Feng, 2009, but differs from the latter in: (1) frons yellowish to blackish brown (frons black in O. wuyiensis); (2) ventral margin near base of periandrium without a spinose process (ventral margin near base of periandrium with a spinose process in O. wuyiensis); (3) dorsal process of endosoma directed ventrocephalad (dorsal process of endosoma directed dorsocephalad in O. wuyiensis); (4) ventral process of endosoma curved and rounded at apex (ventral process of endosoma straight and pointed in O. wuyiensis).

Oecleopsis panxianensis Lv & Chen, sp. nov.

Fig. 3A–N

Type materials

Holotype : China • ♂; Guizhou Province, Panxian County, Banqiao Town; 25°44'N, 104°39'E; sweeping, 2 July 2011; Zhi-Hua Fan leg.; IEGU. Paratype: 1♂, same collection data as for holotype; IEGU.

Diagnosis

The salient features of the new species include: vertex (Fig. 3A, C) at least three times as long as broad; frons (Fig. 3D) yellowish brown, with brown spots; aedeagus (Fig. 3K–N) in total with 3 processes; spinose process near apex of periandrium on right side (Fig. 3K) long, half wide at base, half thinner at end; left side (Fig. 3L) apical process of endosoma bifurcated, rami long, approximately equal length; a subapical spine, lateral margins curved.

Figure 3. 

A–N Oecleopsis panxianensis sp. nov., male A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, lateral view C head and thorax, dorsal view D frons, ventral view E forewing F male terminalia, lateral view G gonostyli, inner lateral view H pygofer and gonostyli, ventral view I anal segment, dorsal view J anal segment, right lateral view K aedeagus, right side L aedeagus, left side M aedeagus, dorsal view N aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Measurements

Total length: male 7.23–7.65 mm (n = 2).

Description

Coloration. General color dark brown (Fig. 3A, B). Vertex blackish brown. Eyes brown, ocelli yellowish. Frons yellowish brown, with brown spots, carinae lighter; rostrum blackish brown. Pronotum grayish to blackish brown with carinae yellowish or light brown. Mesonotum dark brown, carinae brown. Forewings semitranslucent, light brown, with several brown markings, stigma yellowish brown. Hindwings semitransparent. Abdomen dark brown.

Head and thorax. Vertex (Fig. 3A, C) narrow, 3.23 times longer than wide. Frons (Fig. 3D) with distinct median carina, longer in middle line than wide at widest portion (about 1.67:1). Clypeus (Fig. 3D) with distinct median and lateral carinae. Rostrum elongate, surpassing hind-coxae. Pronotum (Fig. 3C) wider than maximum width of head (including eyes) (1.60:1), lateral and median carinae present. Mesonotum (Fig. 3C) about 6.92 times longer than pronotum in midline, with 5 carinae, distal part of median carina blurry. Forewings (Fig. 3E) slender, longer than maximal width (3.01:1), with 12 apical and 6 subapical cells; fork ScP+R distal to fork CuA1+CuA2; RP 3 branches, MP1+2 3 branches, and MP3+4 2 branches.

Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 3F, H) symmetrical, in lateral view, lateral lobes triangularly extended caudally; in ventral view, dorsal margin concave and U-shaped, middle part narrow. Medioventral process triangular in ventral view. Anal segment (Fig. 3F, I, J) tubular, asymmetrical, widened towards apex in left side view; in right side view, left ventral margin convex and right ventral margin excavated near apex; 1.68 times longer than wide in dorsal view; anal style finger-like, beyond anal tube. Aedeagus (Fig. 3K–N) in total with 3 processes; spinose process near apex of periandrium on right side long, half wide at base, half thinner at end, directed cephalically, more than 1/2 length of periandrium; left side apical process of endosoma bifurcated, rami long, approximately equal length, dorsal ramus directed cephalad, ventral ramus directed ventrocephalad; a subapical spine, lateral margins curved, curved dorsad, apical margin rounded. Gonostyli (Fig. 3F–H) slender, curved apically, tapering into a process, constricted for about ¾ its length, T-shaped in ventral view.

Distribution

China (Guizhou) (Fig. 1).

Etymology

The new species is named after its the county in which it was collected.

Remarks

This species is similar to Oecleopsis laminatus Zhi & Chen, 2018, but differs from the latter in: (1) spinose process near apex of periandrium long, half wide at the base, ½ thinner at end (spinose process near apex of periandrium long, smoothly tapering at the end in O. laminatus); (2) apical process of endosoma bifurcated at base (apical process of endosoma bifurcated at apex in O. laminatus); (3) left side near apex of endosoma with a spiniform process, curved dorsad (left side near apex of endosoma with a large laminal process, directed cephalad in O. laminatus).

Oecleopsis digitatus Lv & Chen, sp. nov.

Figs 4A–N, 5D–F

Type materials

Holotype : China • ♂; Sichuan Province, Dayi County, Xiling Town; 30°38'N, 103°14'E; sweeping, 20 July 2022; Sha-Sha Lv leg.; IEGU. Paratypes: China • 6♂♂4♀♀; Sichuan Province, Dayi County, Xiling Town; 30°38'N, 103°14'E; sweeping, 20 July 2022; Sha-Sha Lv, Lan Zhang, Yong-Jin Sui & Feng-E Li leg.; IEGU.

Diagnosis

The salient features of the new species include: vertex (Fig. 4A, C) less than three times as long as broad; spinose process near apex of periandrium on right side (Fig. 4K) short and thick, finger-like; left side (Fig. 4L) apical process of endosoma bifurcated, rami short; two subapical spines long, dorsal process tapering toward the end, ventral process curved.

Figure 4. 

A–N Oecleopsis digitatus sp. nov., male A habitus, dorsal view B habitus, lateral view C head and thorax, dorsal view D frons, ventral view E forewing F male terminalia, lateral view G gonostyli, inner lateral view H pygofer and gonostyli, ventral view I anal segment, dorsal view J anal segment, right lateral view K aedeagus, right side L aedeagus, left side M aedeagus, dorsal view N aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Measurements

Total length: male 5.8–6.4 mm (n = 7), female 6.8–7.5 mm (n = 5).

Description

Coloration. General color grayish black (Fig. 4A, B). Vertex brown-black. Eyes dark brown, ocelli yellowish. Frons black, carinae yellowish brown; rostrum black. Pronotum brown-black with carinae yellowish or light brown. Mesonotum black, carinae brown. Forewings semitranslucent, yellowish brown, with several small brown markings, stigma brown. Hindwings semitransparent. Abdomen dark brown.

Head and thorax. Vertex (Fig. 4A, C) narrow, 2.41 times longer than wide. Frons (Fig. 4D) with distinct median carina, longer in middle line than wide at widest portion (about 1.45:1). Clypeus (Fig. 4D) with distinct median and lateral carinae. Rostrum elongate, surpassing hind-coxae. Pronotum (Fig. 4C) wider than maximum width of head (including eyes) (1.39:1), lateral and median carinae present. Mesonotum (Fig. 4C) about 7.17 times longer than pronotum in midline, with 5 carinae, distal part of median carina blurry. Forewings (Fig. 4E) slender, longer than maximal width (2.94:1), with 12 apical and 6 subapical cells; fork ScP+R distal to fork CuA1+CuA2; RP 3 branches, MP1+2 3 branches, and MP3+4 2 branches.

Male terminalia. Pygofer (Fig. 4F, H) symmetrical, in lateral view, lateral lobes triangularly extended caudally; in ventral view, dorsal margin concave and U-shaped, widened towards apex. Medioventral process triangular in ventral view. Anal segment (Fig. 4F, I, J) tubular, asymmetrical, widened towards apex in left side view; in right side view, left ventral margin convex and right ventral margin excavated near apex; 1.64 times longer than wide in dorsal view; anal style finger-like, beyond anal tube. Aedeagus (Fig. 4K–N) with 4 processes in total; spinose process near apex of periandrium on right side short and thick, directed dorsocephalad, finger-like, only a 1/4 length of periandrium; left side apical process of endosoma bifurcated, curved outward, rami short, dorsal ramus directed dorsad, ventral ramus directed ventrad; 2 subapical spines long, dorsal process tapering toward end, directed cephalad; ventral process curved, curved ventrad. Gonostyli (Fig. 4F–H) slender, curved apically, tapering into a process, curved portion near right angle, T-shaped in ventral view.

Female terminalia. Terminalia, viewed ventrally, are shown in Fig. 5D. Anal segment (Fig. 5F) 1.84 times longer than wide in dorsal view. Posterior vagina (Fig. 5E) elongate, with 4 sclerites in total, dorsal sclerite tapering at the end, median and ventral sclerites long, suboblong and slender, respectively, left side of terminal sclerite twist into thick finger-like process.

Figure 5. 

A–F female terminalia of Oecleopsis species A–C Oecleopsis acerbus sp. nov. D–F Oecleopsis digitatus sp. nov. A, D female terminalia, ventral view B, E posterior vagina, ventral view C, F anal segment, dorsal view. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Distribution

China (Sichuan) (Fig. 1).

Etymology

The species name is derived from the Latin adjective “digitatus”, referring to the finger-like spinose process near apex of periandrium on the right side.

Remarks

This species is similar to Oecleopsis sinicus (Jacobi, 1944), but differs from the latter in: (1) MP1+2 of forewing 3 branches (MP1+2 of forewing 2 branches in O. sinicus); (2) rami of bifurcation asymmetrical, unequal in length (rami of bifurcation symmetrical, equal in length in O. sinicus); (3) spinose process near apex of periandrium finger-like on right side, directed dorsocephalad (spinose process near apex of periandrium awl-shaped on right side, directed ventrocephalad in O. sinicus).

Discussion

Host plant information is less well documented in cixiids, especially in the genus Oecleopsis, where the host plants of only two species have been recorded so far. Oecleopsis sinicus (Jacobi, 1944) was collected on Artemisia L. sp. (Asteraceae) and Zea mays L. (Panicoideae), and O. yoshikawai (Ishihara, 1961) was collected on bamboo (Bambusoideae) (Zhi et al. 2018). Since these two discoveries, no additional information has been found on the ecology or behavior of any other species of Oecleopsis.

Based on data from published information and our field surveys, the distribution of Oecleopsis is restricted to the Palaearctic and Oriental regions (Fig. 1) (Holt et al. 2013), and the genus especially speciose in China where all species have been recorded to date. However, at present, it is mainly known to occur in Central, East, South, and Southwest China, but collection and survey data are still not comprehensive enough. Therefore, we believe that additional wide-ranging field surveys will find that the diversity of Oecleopsis in China is doubtlessly richer.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the specimen collectors for their hard work in the field collections. We wish to express our sincere thanks to Prof. Thierry Bourgoin for his translation of the French literature on O. cucullatus (Noualhier, 1896).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32060343), the National Key Research and Development Program (grant no. 2021YFD1601000), and the Program of Planting Management Department of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (grant no. 152307023).

Author contributions

SSL, LY and YBZ conceived the original idea. SSL, YZ and PZ carried out the experiment. SSL wrote the manuscript with support from LY, YBZ and XSC. SSL, YZ and PZ offered great in data analysis.

Author ORCIDs

Sha-Sha Lv https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-5082

Lin Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7841-5156

Yu-Bo Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-6190

Yan Zhi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-8139

Pei Zhang https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0251-0980

Xiang-Sheng Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-0343

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Anufriev GA, Emeljanov AF (1988) Suborder Cicadinea (Auchenorrhyncha). In: Lehr PA (Ed.) Keys to the Insects of the Far East of the USSR (Vol. 2). Homoptera and Heteroptera. Nauka Publishing House, Leningrad, 496 pp.
  • Bourgoin T (1987) A new interpretation of the homologies of the Hemiptera male genitalia, illustrated by the Tettigometridae (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha). Proceedings 6th Auchenorrhyncha Meeting, Turin, Italy, 7–11 September, 113–120.
  • Bourgoin T (2023) FLOW (Fulgoromorpha Lists On the Web): A knowledge and a taxonomy database dedicated to planthoppers (Insecta, Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Fulgoroidea). Version 8, updated 06 September 2023. https://flow.hemiptera-databases.org/flow/ [Accessed on: 6 September 2023]
  • Bourgoin T, Wang RR, Asche M, Hoch H, Soulier-Perkins A, Stroiński A, Yap S, Szwedo J (2015) From micropterism to hyperpterism recognition strategy and standardized homology-driven terminology. Zoomorphology 134(1): 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-014-0243-6
  • Emeljanov AF (1971) New genera of leafhoppers of the families Cixiidae and Issidae (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha) from the fauna of the USSR. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 50(3): 619–627.
  • Fennah RG (1956) Fulgoroidea from Southern China. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 28: 441–527.
  • Guo HW, Wang YL, Feng JN (2009) Taxonomic study of the genus Oecleopsis Emeljanov, 1971 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Cixiidae: Pentastirini), with descriptions of three new species from China. Zootaxa 2172(1): 45–58. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2172.1.3
  • Holt BG, Lessard JP, Borregaard MK, Fritz SA, Araújo MB, Dimitrov D, Fabre PH, Graham CH, Graves GR, Jønsson KA, Nogués-Bravo D, Wang Z, Whittaker RJ, Fjeldså J, Rahbek C (2013) An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 339(6115): 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228282
  • Luo Y, Bourgoin T, Zhang JL, Feng JN (2022) Distribution patterns of Chinese Cixiidae (Hemiptera, Fulgoroidea), highlight their high endemic diversity. Biodiversity Data Journal 10: 1–81. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e75303
  • Matsumura S (1914) Die Cixiinen Japans. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 8: 393–434.
  • Noualhier JM (1896) Note sur les Hémiptères récoltés en Indo-Chine et offerts au Muséum par M. Pavie. Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris 10: 251–259.
  • Tsaur SC, Hsu TC, Van Stalle J (1988) Cixiidae of Taiwan, Part I. Pentastirini. Journal of Taiwan Museum 41(1): 35–74.
  • Van Stalle J (1991) Taxonomy of Indo-Malayan Pentastirini (Homoptera, Cixiidae). Bulletin de l’Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique. Entomologie 61: 5–101.
  • Zhi Y, Yang L, Zhang P, Chen XS (2018) Two new species of genus Oecleopsis Emeljanov from China, with descriptions of female genitalia of five species (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Cixiidae). ZooKeys 768: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.768.24796
login to comment