Research Article |
Corresponding author: Zhao Pan ( panzhao86@yeah.net ) Corresponding author: Xiu-Min Li ( lixiumin@hbu.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Patrice Bouchard
© 2024 Bao-Yue Ji, Xing-Tao Ma, Ji-Da Rong, Guo-Dong Ren, Zhao Pan, Xiu-Min Li.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ji B-Y, Ma X-T, Rong J-D, Ren G-D, Pan Z, Li X-M (2024) The adult, pupa, and larva of a new species of Gnaptorina Reitter, 1887 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Blaptini) from the Tibetan Plateau, with molecular phylogenetic inferences. ZooKeys 1190: 91-106. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1190.113126
|
The adult, pupa and larva of a new species, Gnaptorina (Gnaptorina) lhorongica Li, sp. nov., from northeastern Xizang, China are described and illustrated. The species was identified using molecular phylogenetic analyses based on three mitochondrial fragments and one nuclear gene fragment (COI, Cytb, 16S, and 28S-D2). The taxonomic status of the new species is confirmed using a combination of molecular and morphological datasets. This study provides valuable molecular and morphological data for phylogenetic studies of the tribe Blaptini.
Beetle, China, DNA sequence, morphological description
The genus Gnaptorina Reitter, 1887 belongs to the subtribe Gnaptorinina Medvedev, 2001 of the tribe Blaptini Leach, 1815 of the subfamily Blaptinae Leach, 1815 (
Gnaptorina is the third largest genus of the subtribe Gnaptorinina with 38 described species (
In this study, the adults, pupa and larva of a new Gnaptorina species are described based on morphological and molecular evidence. In addition, we construct a molecular phylogeny for the genus and apply it to verify the taxonomic status of the new species.
In total, 64 adults, two larvae, and one pupa of the new species were examined for this study and deposited at the Museum of Hebei University, Baoding, China (MHBU).
The photos were taken with three imaging systems: (a) Canon EOS 5D Mark III (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) connected to a Laowa FF 100 mm F2.8 CA-Dreamer Macro 2× or Laowa FF 25 mm F2.8 Ultra Macro 2.5–5× (Anhui Changgeng Optics Technology Co., Hefei, China); (b) a Leica M205A stereomicroscope equipped with a Leica DFC450 camera (Leica Microsystems, Singapore, Singapore), which was controlled using the Leica application suite v. 4.3; (c) JVC KY-F75U (JVC Kenwood, Long Beach, CA, USA) digital camera attached to a Leica Z16 APO dissecting microscope (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) with an apochromatic zoom objective and motor focus drive, using a Syncroscopy Auto-Montage System (Synoptics, Cambridge, UK) and software. Multiple images were used to construct the final figures. Images were illuminated with either an LED ring light attached to the end of the microscope column, with incidental light filtered to reduce glare, or by a gooseneck illuminator with bifurcating fiberoptics; image stacks were white-balance corrected using the system software (Synoptics, Cambridge, UK). Montaged images were edited using Adobe Photoshop v. 22.1.0 to form the final figure plates.
Label data are presented verbatim. A slash (/) separates text on different lines of label. A double slash (//) separates text on separate lines of a label; authors’ remarks are enclosed in brackets “[]”.
Larval specimens were collected in the field together with adults from the Tibetan Plateau, China. To correlate the different stages, the molecular data were collected from six individuals (four adults, one larva, and one pupa).
DNA was extracted from the pygopod tissues of the larva and pupa, and from the leg muscle tissue of the adults using the Insect DNA isolation Kit (BIOMIGA, Dalian, China) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The DNA extracted was stored at –20 °C. Fragments of three mitochondrial markers (cytochrome oxidase subunit I, COI; cytochrome b, Cytb; 16S ribosomal DNA, 16S), and one nuclear marker (28S ribosomal DNA domain D2, 28S-D2) were amplified and sequenced. The primers and the annealing temperatures are shown in Table
Gene | Primer (forward/reverse) | Sequence (forward and reverse) 5′→3′ | PCR conditions (annealing) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
COI | F 2183 | CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG | 50 °C |
|
R 3014 | TCCAATGCACTAATCTGCCATATTA | |||
Cytb | F revcb2h | TGAGGACAAATATCATTTTGAGGW | 50 °C |
|
R rebcbj | TCAGGTCGAGCTCCAATTCATGT | |||
16S | F 13398 | CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT | 50 °C |
|
R 12887 | CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCAT | |||
28S-D2 | F 3665 | AGAGAGAGTTCAAGAGTACGTG | 58 °C |
|
R 4068 | TTGGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGGG |
The profile of the PCR amplification consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 4 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing for 45 s, an extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final 8 min extension step at 72 °C. PCR was performed using TaKaRa Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). PCR products were subsequently checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing was performed at General Biol Co. (Anhui, China). Altogether, all molecular data were collected from 82 individuals (80 adults, one larva, and one pupa); 89 new sequences from 26 individuals of nine species were generated, and 211 sequences were previously published (
Phylogenetic analyses were based on the concatenated dataset under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion in IQ-TREE v. 1.6.6 (
Lajiu Township, Lhorong County, Xizang.
(Adults). Holotype: China • ♂//西藏洛隆腊久乡 [Lajiu Township, Lhorong County, Xizang]/ 30°28.714′N, 95°53.593′E/ Alt. 4680 m /labeled 30.Jul. 2019/ 任国栋, 李亚林, 白兴龙 [Guo-Dong Ren, Ya-lin Li & Xing-Long Bai leg.]. Paratypes: 4♂6♀// 西藏洛隆腊久乡 [Lajiu Township, Lhorong County, Xizang]/ 30°28.714′N, 95°53.593′E/ Alt. 4680 m/ labeled 30. Jul. 2019/ 任国栋, 李亚林, 白兴龙 [Guo-Dong Ren, Ya-lin Li & Xing-Long Bai leg.]; 6♂4♀// 西藏洛隆腊久乡[Lajiu Township, Lhorong County, Xizang]/ 30°25.203′N, 96°5.950′E/ Alt. 3910 m/ labeled 30.Jul. 2019/ 任国栋,李亚林, 白兴龙 [Guo-Dong Ren, Ya-lin Li & Xing-Long Bai leg.]; 6♂8♀// same data as holotype; 10♂8♀// 西藏洛隆孜托镇 [Zituo Township, Lhorong County, Xizang]/ 30°32.515′N, 95°46.774′E/ Alt. 4031 m/ labeled 30.Jul. 2019/ 任国栋, 李亚林, 白兴龙 [Guo-Dong Ren, Ya-lin Li & Xing-Long Bai leg.]; 3♂8♀// 西藏洛隆达翁拉山 [Daonla mountain, Lhorong County, Xizang]/ 30°46.204′N, 95°33.758′E/ Alt. 3854 m/ labeled 11.Jul. 2015/ 任国栋, 白兴龙 [Guo-Dong Ren & Xing-Long Bai leg.].
Larva. 2 ex. // 西藏洛隆腊久乡 [Lajiu Township, Lhorong County, Xizang]/ 30°28.714′N, 95°53.593′E/ Alt. 4680 m/ labeled 30.Jul. 2019/ 任国栋, 李亚林, 白兴龙 [Guo-Dong Ren, Ya-lin Li & Xing-Long Bai leg.].
Pupa. 1♂// 西藏洛隆腊久乡 [Lajiu Township, Lhorong County, Xizang]/ 30°28.714′N, 95°53.593′E/ Alt. 4680 m/ labeled 30.Jul. 2019/ 任国栋, 李亚林, 白兴龙 [Guo-Dong Ren, Ya-lin Li & Xing-Long Bai leg.].
Body length 10.5–11.2mm, width 5.8–6.0 mm; body shiny, black; antennae, palpi, and tarsi brown.
Male (Figs
Gnaptorina (Gnaptorina) lhorongica Li, sp. nov. Holotype A head, dorsal view B head, ventral view C pronotum D antenna E protibia F mesotibia G metatibia H protarsus I mesotarsus J metatarsus K aedeagus, dorsal view L aedeagus, lateral view M aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A–C, K–M); 0.5 mm (D–J).
Gnaptorina (Gnaptorina) dongdashanensis Shi, 2013 A head, dorsal view B head, ventral view C pronotum D antenna E protibia F mesotibia G metatibia H protarsus I mesotarsus J metatarsus K aedeagus, dorsal view L aedeagus, lateral view M aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A–C); 0.5 mm (D–M).
Prothorax. Pronotum (Fig.
Pterothorax. Elytra widely oval and convex, 1.12–1.26 times as long as wide, 1.61–1.77 times as wide as pronotum, widest before middle. Surface with shallow, fine, sparse punctures and irregular, short wrinkles. Lateral margins reaching sutural elytral angle, visible dorsally in anterior third and apex. Surface of epipleura smooth, with shallow wrinkles.
Legs
(Fig.
Aedeagus. (Fig.
Female (Fig.
Named after the county of Lhorong, where the type locality is located.
China: Xizang.
This new species is morphologically similar to G. (G.) dongdashanensis Shi, 2013 but can be distinguished from it by the following male character states: (1) genal margin arcuately converging before eyes (genal margin parallel before eyes in G. dongdashanensis); (2) antennomeres IV–VII long and cylindrical (antennomeres IV–VII nearly spherical in G. dongdashanensis); (4) elytral widely oval (elytral elongate-oval in G. dongdashanensis). (Figs
Body. (Fig.
Head
(Figs
Thorax
(Fig.
Legs
(Figs
Abdomen
(Fig.
Spiracles
(Fig.
The larva of new species is morphologically very similar to G. (G.) cylindricollis Reitter, 1889, but can be distinguished from it by the following characters: (1) lateral margins of the head with dense long setae (lateral margins of the head with sparse long setae in G. cylindricollis); (2) mentum with two long setae on the side of the posterior margin and submentum with eight setae on located in the middle, posteriorly (mentum with four long setae on the side of the posterior margin and submentum with five setae in the posterior part of the center in G. cylindricollis).
The larva of new species is morphologically very similar to G. (G.) felicitana but can be distinguished from the latter by the following characters: (1) lateral margins of the head with dense, long setae (G. (G.) felicitana with sparse, long setae); (2) terga I–VIII with four pairs of long setae, two anterior pairs and two posterior pairs (G. (G.) felicitana with six pairs of long setae, three anterior pairs and three posterior pairs); (3) frons with eight setae, two on upper margin, six on apex (G. (G.) felicitana with eight setae, two on upper margin, two at center, and four at posterior margin in); (4) apex of antennomere III without long setae (G. (G.) felicitana with one long seta at the apex); (5) side posterior margin of mentum with two long setae and middle of submentum with eight setae posteriorly (G. (G.) felicitana with mentum and submentum both with 10 setae).
Body
(Fig.
Head
(Figs
Thorax
(Fig.
Legs
(Fig.
Abdomen
(Fig.
The final, concatenated dataset was 2321-bp long, including 300 sequences from 82 specimens of 32 described species and six specimens of the new species (COI, 648 bp; Cytb, 579 bp; 16S, 496 bp; 28S-D2, 443 bp). IQ-TREE analyses yielded a topology, and the preliminary phylogenetic relationship was hypothesized for the genus Gnaptorina (Fig.
The ML tree revealed that there was a reasonable correlation of membership of these major clades. The monophy of the subgenera was well supported overall. The individuals of Gnaptorina were grouped into three well-supported clades: clade C1 (Gnaptorina, uBV = 96), clade C2 (Austroptorina, uBV = 100) and clade C3 (Hesperoptorina, uBV = 87). The taxonomic status of the new species is confirmed by phylogenetic relationships and morphological evidence: G. (G.) lhorongica Li, sp. nov. The adult, pupa, and larva cluster into a single well-supported clade (uBV = 100). Based on the above results, the larval and pupal samples are confirmed as adult stages of G. (G.) lhorongica Li, sp. nov. The molecular analyses also indicate that the new species is a closely related and sister to G. (G.) dongdashanensis.
The adults, pupa, and larva of G. lhorongica Li, sp. nov. were collected in the field; hence, it was rather difficult to judge the larval developmental stage. The larva used for the description above was inferred to be in its final instar stage based on previous research on the larval biology of the Blaptini.
The genus Gnaptorina comprises 38 species (
We thank Xinglong Bai for his kind help with fieldwork and for providing samples from Xizang. We also thank Junxia Zhang for additional comments and corrections. Finally, we are very grateful by two anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions on the manuscript.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of Hebei (C202101020), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170477), and National Innovative Entrepreneurship Training Program for college students (S202310075045).
Conceptualization: B-YJ, ZP, X-ML. Data curation: X-MLand X-TM. Formal analysis: B-YJ, X-ML. Writing – original draft: B-YJ, X-TM. Visualization: X-TM, J-DR. Funding acquisition: G-DR, X-ML. Writing – review and editing: B-YJ, J-DR, ZP, G-DR.
Bao-Yue Ji https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-5481
Xing-Tao Ma https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4075-7292
Ji-Da Rong https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3207-5302
Guo-Dong Ren https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-9122
Zhao-Pan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-0009
Xiu-Min Li https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-1869
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.
List of specimens used in this study with the corresponding accession number
Data type: docx