Research Article |
Corresponding author: Shuqiang Li ( lisq@ioz.ac.cn ) Academic editor: Zhiyuan Yao
© 2023 Chang Chu, Yejie Lin, Shuqiang Li.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Chu C, Lin Y, Li S (2023) New genera and new species of Hahniidae (Araneae) from China, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam. ZooKeys 1187: 91-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1187.112936
|
Four new genera and 11 new species of Hahniidae Bertkau, 1878 are described. The new genera are Goblinia Lin & Li, gen. nov., with the type species G. tiane Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀) from Guangxi, China; Myahnia Lin & Li, gen. nov., with the type species M. kanpetlet Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀) from Chin, Myanmar; Troglohnia Lin & Li, gen. nov., with the type species Tr. qiubei Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀) from Yunnan, China and Typhlohnia Lin & Li, gen. nov., with the type species Ty. rongshui Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀) from Guangxi, China. Seven additional new species are described: Tr. dafang Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀) from Guizhou, China; Tr. shidian Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♀) from Yunnan, China; Tr. wuding Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀) from Yunnan, China; Ty. banlaksao Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♀) from Bolikhamxay, Laos; Ty. kaiyang Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♀) from Guizhou, China; Ty. sondoong Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♂♀) from Quang Binh, Vietnam and Ty. suiyang Lin & Li, sp. nov. (♀) from Guizhou, China.
Comb-tailed spiders, diagnosis, endemic, Hahniinae, taxonomy
Asian spider taxonomists have published a large number of papers in the 21st Century, but due to the rich biodiversity of the Southeast Asia fauna, there are still many unknown species (
All specimens were preserved in 80% ethanol. The spermathecae were cleared in trypsin enzyme solution to dissolve non-chitinous tissues. Specimens were examined under a LEICA M205C stereomicroscope. Photomicrographs were taken with an Olympus C7070 zoom digital camera (7.1 megapixels). Photographs were stacked with Helicon Focus (v. 7.6.1) or Zerene Stacker (v. 1.04) and processed in Adobe Photoshop CC2022.
All measurements are in millimetres (mm) and were obtained with an Olympus SZX16 stereomicroscope with a Zongyuan CCD industrial camera. All measurements of body lengths do not include the chelicerae. Eye sizes are measured as the maximum diameter from either the dorsal or the frontal view. Legs were measured laterally. Leg measurements are given as follows: total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). Four paratype males specimens (Goblinia tiane sp. nov., Myahnia kanpetlet sp. nov., Troglohnia qiubei sp. nov. and Typhlohnia rongshui sp. nov.) were used for electron microscopy. They were fragile after electron microscopy, so their variation data was not measured. The terminology used in the text and figures follows
Types from the current study are deposited in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (
Abbreviations used in text: AER anterior eye row; ALE anterior lateral eye; AME anterior median eye; C conductor; CD copulatory duct; CF cymbial furrow; CO copulatory opening; D depression; d dorsal; dRTA dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis; E embolus; ET embolic tooth; FD fertilization duct; GA glandular appendage; H hood; MOA median ocular area; p prolateral; PA patellar apophysis; PER posterior eye row; PLE posterior lateral eye; PME posterior median eye; PS primary spermatheca; r retrolateral; RTA retrolateral tibial apophysis; S spermatheca; SD sperm dust; SS secondary spermatheca; v ventral; vRTA ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis.
Goblinia tiane sp. nov. from Guangxi, China.
Goblinia gen. nov. can be distinguished from Iberina Simon, 1881 by the spineless male palpal femur (Fig.
Male. Total length 1.87–2.40 (n = 5). Carapace pale yellow, covered with few black setae. PER longer than AER, AER and PER procurved. AME separated by less than their diameter, closer to ALE; PME separated by almost their diameter, approximately as far from ALE; Distance between AME and PME longer than that between ALE and PLE; ALE and PLE almost touching. Clypeus pale yellow, covered with few setae. Chelicerae pale yellow, with three promarginal and three retromarginal teeth, with granular stridulatory files retrolaterally (Fig.
Palpal femur almost 4× longer than patella, spineless. Patella shorter than tibia. Retrolateral tibial apophysis almost as long as tibia, curved to almost 100° angle. Cymbium egg-shaped, cymbial furrow almost as long as bulb. Bulb discoid round, without conductor. Sperm duct with curved course. Embolus whip-shaped, starting at ca 4:30 o’clock position.
Female. Total length 1.96–2.55 (n = 5). Somatic characters as in male but chelicerae with two promarginal and three retromarginal teeth, stridulatory files absent.
Epigynal plate wider than long. Copulatory openings located anteriorly, round, touching each other. Copulatory ducts long and intertwined, beginning laminar. Glandular appendages round, touching each other. Spermathecae oval, located posteriorly, separated by less than radius.
The new generic name is a combination of goblin (a legendary creature that lives underground) and Hahnia. The gender is feminine.
Currently monotypic: Goblinia tiane sp. nov.
China (Guangxi) (Fig.
Holotype
: ♂ (
Same as for genus.
Male (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (paratype
Coloration
(Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Males (n = 4): total body length 1.89–2.40, carapace 0.87–1.09 long, 0.76–0.88 wide, opisthosoma 0.98–1.31 long, 0.71–0.98 wide. Females (n = 4): total body length 1.96–2.55, carapace 0.80–0.96 long, 0.63–0.77 wide, opisthosoma 1.09–1.59 long, 0.81–1.18 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Myahnia kanpetlet sp. nov. from Chin, Myanmar.
Myahnia gen. nov. can be distinguished from Hexamatia Rivera-Quiroz, Petcharad & Miller, 2020 by the larger body size > 1.49 mm (Fig.
Male. Small size. Carapace yellow, covered with few black setae. Six eyes in two rows; AME absent, PER longer than AER, PER procurved. ALE separated by almost their diameter; PME separated by longer than their diameter; ALE and PLE almost touching. Clypeus yellow, covered with several setae. Chelicerae yellow, with two promarginal and three retromarginal teeth, stridulatory files striped. Endites, labium yellow, covered with few black setae. Sternum coloured as endites, covered with brown setae. Legs yellow. Opisthosoma oval, grey without pattern. Spinnerets grey, straight in posterior view. Tracheal spiracle long and transverse, distance of spiracle to epigastric furrow as long as to spinnerets.
Palpal femur almost 3× longer than patella, spineless. Patella longer than tibia, with retroventral apophysis. Tibia with long, curved serrated retrolateral apophysis. Cymbium 1.7× longer than wide, cymbial furrow almost 0.5× longer than cymbium. Bulb oval, without conductor, with sclerotized apophysis retrolaterally. Embolus whip-shaped, starting at ca 3:00–5:00 o’clock position, curving clockwise along tegular margin.
Female. Total length 1.49–1.76 (n = 4). Somatic characters as in male but body pale yellow and stridulatory files absent.
Epigynal plate 2× wider than long. Copulatory openings located posteriorly, unobvious. Copulatory ducts curved, basal part wide and laminar. Vulva with two pairs of spermathecae. Fertilization ducts small, sickle-shaped.
The new generic name is a combination of Myanmar and Hahnia. The gender is feminine.
Currently monotypic: Myahnia kanpetlet sp. nov.
Myanmar (Fig.
Holotype
: ♂ (
Same as for genus.
Male (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Fig.
Palp
(Fig.
Female (paratype
Coloration
(Fig.
Epigyne
(Fig.
Females (n = 3): total body length 1.49–1.76, carapace 0.68–0.71 long, 0.50–0.52 wide, opisthosoma 0.81–1.05 long, 0.60–0.75 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Troglohnia qiubei sp. nov. from Yunnan, China.
Troglohnia gen. nov. can be distinguished from all other genera of Hahniidae by having stridulatory files on sides of pars cephalica (Figs
Troglohnia dafang sp. nov., holotype male A ventral view B retrolateral view. Dashed line shows conductor stalk. Abbreviations: C = conductor, CF = cymbial furrow, dRTA = dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis, E = embolus, ET = embolic tooth, PA = patellar apophysis, RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis, vRTA = ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis.
Male. Total length 2.33–3.21 (n = 8). Carapace yellowish, middle region with indistinct brown band, margin with brown pattern, lateral cephalic region with stridulatory files. PER longer than AER, AER straight, PER procurved. AME separated by less than diameter; PME separated by almost diameter, approximately as far from ALE; distance between AME and PME longer than that between ALE and PLE; ALE and PLE almost touching. Clypeus pale yellow, covered with several setae. Chelicerae pale yellow, with two or three promarginal and three or four retromarginal teeth, chelicerae with stridulatory files. Endites, labium pale yellow, covered with few black setae. Sternum brown, covered with brown setae. Legs pale yellow. Opisthosoma grey, middle of anteriorly and laterally with rod-shaped brown patterns, middle of posteriorly with inverted V-shaped brown patterns; venter with brown patterns and brown ring around spinnerets. Spinnerets base brown and tip white, straight in posterior view. Tracheal spiracle long and transverse, located at 3/4 of opisthosoma length.
Palpal femur almost 2× longer than patella, spineless. Patella modified, strongly swollen, longer and > 1.5× wider than tibia. Retrolateral tibial apophysis with 2 sickle-shaped and without serrated arms, basal with an apophysis with a line of setae. Cymbium kidney-shaped, ~ 1.5× longer than wide. Cymbial furrow S-shaped, almost as long as cymbium. Bulb almost oval, ca 1.23× longer than wide. Sperm duct with U-shaped curve (Fig.
Female. Total length 2.25–3.86 (n = 21). Somatic characters as in male but chelicerae with three promarginal and three or four retromarginal teeth, stridulatory files absent.
Epigynal plate almost 1.3–1.45× wider than long, genital groove with a pair of posterior hoods. Copulatory openings located medium, arc-shaped. Copulatory ducts long, strongly convoluted, base thick, bifurcate, then become thinner; short one connected to secondary spermathecae, other connected to primary spermathecae. Primary spermathecae oval or bean-shaped, secondary spermathecae globular. Fertilization ducts laminar, sickle-shaped.
The new generic name is a combination of Troglobiont (refers to the cave habitat) and Hahnia. The gender is feminine.
This new genus includes four species: Troglohnia dafang sp. nov. (♂♀), T. qiubei sp. nov. (♂♀), T. shidian sp. nov. (♀), and T. wuding sp. nov. (♂♀).
China (Guizhou, Yunnan) (Fig.
Holotype
: ♂ (
Troglohnia dafang sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. qiubei sp. nov. by the tip of patellar apophysis pointed to 9:30 o’clock position (Fig.
Troglohnia qiubei sp. nov., holotype male A ventral view B retrolateral view. Dashed line shows conductor stalk; red arrow shows the process on tegulum. Abbreviations: C = conductor, CF = cymbial furrow, dRTA = dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis, E = embolus, ET = embolic tooth, PA = patellar apophysis, RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis, vRTA = ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis.
Male (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Fig.
Palp
(Figs
Female (paratype
Coloration
(Fig.
Epigyne
(Figs
Male: total body length 2.33, carapace 1.15 long, 0.93 wide, opisthosoma 1.18 long, 0.92 wide. Females (n = 3): total body length 2.25–2.88, carapace 1.00–1.14 long, 0.73–0.88 wide, opisthosoma 1.23–1.74 long, 0.86–1.30 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Holotype
: ♂ (
Troglohnia qiubei sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. wuding sp. nov. by the male ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis almost straight and as wide as dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis (Fig.
Troglohnia wuding sp. nov., holotype male A ventral view B retrolateral view. Dashed line shows conductor stalk; red arrow shows the process on tegulum. Abbreviations: C = conductor, CF = cymbial furrow, dRTA = dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis, E = embolus, ET = embolic tooth, PA = patellar apophysis, RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis, vRTA = ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis.
Male (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Fig.
Palp
(Figs
Female (paratype
Coloration
(Fig.
Epigyne
(Figs
Males (n = 4): total body length 2.54–3.21, carapace 1.10–1.47 long, 0.80–1.22 wide, opisthosoma 1.44–1.74 long, 1.09–1.20 wide. Females (n = 4): total body length 3.03–3.62, carapace 1.28–1.44 long, 1.08–1.16 wide, opisthosoma 1.68–2.30 long, 1.19–1.48 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Holotype
: ♀ (
Troglohnia shidian sp. nov. can be distinguished from those of T. dafang sp. nov. by the ratio of diameter of secondary spermathecae to length of branched shorter copulatory ducts almost 1:1 (Fig.
Female (holotype; Figs
Troglohnia gen. nov., habitus, dorsal view (A–E, G, H) and ventral view (F) A Tr. dafang sp. nov., holotype male B Same, paratype female C Tr. qiubei sp. nov., holotype male D Same, paratype female E Tr. shidian sp. nov., holotype female F Same G Tr. wuding sp. nov., holotype male H same, paratype female.
Coloration
(Fig.
Epigyne
(Figs
Second paratype female: total body length 3.47, carapace 1.35 long, 1.01 wide, opisthosoma 2.12 long, 1.42 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Holotype
: ♂ (
Troglohnia wuding sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. qiubei sp. nov. by the male ventral retrolateral tibial apophysis strongly curved and wider than dorsal retrolateral tibial apophysis (Fig.
Male (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Fig.
Palp
(Figs
Female (paratype
Coloration
(Fig.
Epigyne
(Figs
Females (n = 9): total body length 3.06–3.86, carapace 1.26–1.58 long, 1.00–1.23 wide, opisthosoma 1.80–2.33 long, 1.29–1.74 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Typhlohnia rongshui sp. nov. from Guangxi, China.
Typhlohnia gen. nov. can be distinguished from Asiohahnia Ovtchinnikov, 1992 by the eyes retrograde (Fig.
Cephalic regions of Typhlohnia gen. nov., dorsal view A Ty. banlaksao sp. nov., holotype female B Ty. kaiyang sp. nov., holotype female C Ty. rongshui sp. nov., holotype male D Same, paratype female E Ty. sondoong sp. nov., holotype male F same, paratype female G Ty. suiyang sp. nov., holotype female.
Typhlohnia gen. nov., habitus, dorsal view A Ty. banlaksao sp. nov., holotype female B Ty. kaiyang sp. nov., holotype female C Ty. rongshui sp. nov., holotype male D Same, paratype female E Ty. sondoong sp. nov., holotype male F same, paratype female G Ty. suiyang sp. nov., holotype female.
Male. Total length 1.38–1.70 (n = 4). Carapace pale white to yellowish, without any pattern. 0–6 eyes, white, most species with two eyes. Fovea longitudinal, unobvious. Clypeus pale yellow, covered with several setae. Chelicerae pale yellow, with two or three promarginal and two or three retromarginal teeth, stridulatory files absent. Endites, labium pale yellow, covered with few black setae. Sternum brown, without markings. Legs pale yellow. Opisthosoma oval, pale white to brown. Spinnerets white, straight in posterior view. Tracheal spiracle long and transverse, distance of spiracle to epigastric furrow as long as to spinnerets.
Palpal femur almost 3× longer than patella, spineless. Patella almost as long as tibia, with hook-shaped apophysis. Retrolateral tibial apophysis curved with serrations. Cymbium oval, almost 2× longer than wide, cymbial furrow almost 1/3–1/6× longer than cymbium. Bulb globular to oval. Sperm duct with U-shaped curve. Embolus whip-shaped, curving clockwise along tegular margin.
Female. Total length 1.30–2.07 (n = 13). Somatic characters as in male.
Epigynal plate wider than long, with a depression anteriorly. Copulatory openings located anteriorly, arc-shaped. Copulatory ducts long, in the rongshui group strongly convoluted, but in the sondoong group simple. The short duct connected to secondary spermathecae, the other connected to primary spermathecae. Primary spermathecae oval to bean-shaped, secondary spermathecae oval to globular. Fertilization ducts laminar, sickle-shaped.
The new generic name is a combination of Typhlo- (refers to the degenerated eyes) and Hahnia. The gender is feminine.
Two species groups: the rongshui group and the sondoong group. These groups can be distinguished by the males embolus originating at 3:00 o’clock position (the rongshui group) or 7:30 o’clock position (the sondoong group), length of embolus almost 3/4 perimeter of bulb (the rongshui group) or half perimeter of bulb (the sondoong group) and females have convoluted copulatory ducts (the rongshui group) or simple copulatory ducts (the sondoong group).
This new genus includes five species: The rongshui group: Typhlohnia kaiyang sp. nov. (♀), T. rongshui sp. nov. (♂♀) and T. suiyang sp. nov. (♀) and the sondoong group: T. banlaksao sp. nov. (♀) and T. sondoong sp. nov. (♂♀).
Laos (Bolikhamxay), Vietnam (Quang Binh) and China (Guizhou, Guangxi) (Fig.
Distribution records of new Hahniidae species in South-east Asia 1 Goblinia tiane sp. nov. 2 Myahnia kanpetlet sp. nov. 3 Troglohnia dafang sp. nov. 4 Tr. qiubei sp. nov. 5 Tr. shidian sp. nov. 6 Tr. wuding sp. nov. 7 Typhlohnia banlaksao sp. nov. 8 Ty. kaiyang sp. nov. 9 Ty. rongshui sp. nov. 10 Ty. sondoong sp. nov. 11 Ty. suiyang sp. nov.
Holotype
: ♀ (
The female of Typhlohnia banlaksao sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. sondoong sp. nov. by the length of copulatory ducts 4× longer than diameter of primary spermathecae (Fig.
Female (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Figs
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Holotype
: ♀ (
The female of Typhlohnia kaiyang sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other species in the rongshui group by the secondary spermathecae at posterior of primary spermathecae (Fig.
Female (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Figs
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Holotype
: ♂ (
The male of Typhlohnia rongshui sp. nov. can be distinguished from T. sondoong sp. nov. by the patella with apophysis retrolaterally (Fig.
Male (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Figs
Palp
(Fig.
Female (paratype
Coloration
(Figs
Epigyne
(Fig.
Males (n = 2): total body length 1.38–1.46, carapace 0.68–0.71 long, 0.51–0.59 wide, opisthosoma 0.70–0.75 long, 0.55–0.57 wide. Females (n = 3): total body length 1.30–1.40, carapace 0.55–0.61 long, 0.44–0.46 wide, opisthosoma 0.73–0.81 long, 0.50–0.57 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Holotype
: ♂ (
For males see diagnosis of Typhlohnia rongshui sp. nov. and for females see diagnosis of T. banlaksao sp. nov.
Male (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Figs
Palp
(Fig.
Female (paratype
Coloration
(Figs
Epigyne
(Fig.
Females (n = 5): total body length 1.50–2.07, carapace 0.69–0.80 long, 0.51–0.59 wide, opisthosoma 0.75–1.27 long, 0.61–1.02 wide.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
Holotype
: ♀ (
See diagnosis of Typhlohnia rongshui sp. nov.
Female (holotype; Figs
Coloration
(Figs
Epigyne
(Fig.
The specific epithet refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Known only from the type locality (Fig.
The manuscript benefitted greatly from comments by Zhiyuan Yao (China), Yuri Marusik (Russia), and Mikhail Omelko (Russia). Danni Sherwood (UK) and Nathalie Yonow (UK) checked the English.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
No funding was reported.
SL designed the study. YL and SL performed morphological species identification. CC finished the species descriptions and took the photos. CC, YL and SL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Chang Chu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-5463
Yejie Lin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-2731
Shuqiang Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5416
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.