Research Article |
Corresponding author: Feng Zhang ( dudu06042001@163.com ) Academic editor: Fedor Konstantinov
© 2024 Yanmeng Hou, Feng Zhang.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Hou Y, Zhang F (2024) Three new species of dragon pseudoscorpions (Pseudoscorpiones, Pseudotyrannochthoniidae) from China. ZooKeys 1204: 135-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1204.111842
|
Three new pseudoscorpions in the family Pseudotyrannochthoniidae are described from China: Allochthonius hispidus sp. nov. from Chongqing (Wushan County), Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis sp. nov. from Beijing (Fangshan District), and Spelaeochthonius tuoliangensis sp. nov. from Hebei (Pingshan County). Detailed diagnoses and illustrations of all new species are provided.
Allochthonius, morphology, Spelaeochthonius, taxonomy
The monophyletic pseudoscorpion family Pseudotyrannochthoniidae Beier, 1932, originated in East Asia during the Middle Triassic (
Distribution of all Pseudotyrannochthoniidae species in China. 1 Allochthonius liaoningensis Hu & Zhang, 2012 2 A. exornatus Gao & Zhang, 2013 3 A. wui Hu & Zhang, 2011 4 A. jingyuanus Zhang & Zhang, 2014 5 A. brevitus 6 A. sichuanensis (Schawaller, 1995) 7 A. hispidus sp. nov. 8 A. lini Li, 2023 9 A. xuae Li, 2023 10 A. bainiensis 11 A. pandus 12 A. xinqiaoensis 13 A. fanjingshan Gao, Zhang & Zhang, 2016 14 A. trigonus Hu & Zhang, 2011 15 A. fuscus Hu & Zhang, 2011 16 Centrochthonius kozlovi (Redikorzev, 1918) 17 C. cheni (Gao, Zhang & Zhang, 2016) 18 Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis sp. nov. 19 S. tuoliangensis sp. nov. 20 S. yinae 21 S. wulibeiensis.
The monophyly of both Allochthonius and Spelaeochthonius receives high support (
The genus Spelaeochthonius, currently found only in East Asia, includes 11 described species. It can be distinguished from other pseudotyrannochthoniid genera by the number of carapaceal setae (only 16), the number, shape, and arrangement of the coxal spines (never on a common protuberance and more than seven blades that are longer and distally pinnate or serrate), and the shape of the intercoxal tubercle (bisetose and generally smaller than that of Allochthonius) (
This study describes three new pseudotyrannochthoniid species from both the surface and subterranean environments. Detailed diagnoses, descriptions, and illustrations are provided for each species. Two of these species are placed in Spelaeochthonius, while one is assigned to Allochthonius. Additionally, a distribution map of all Chinese pseudotyrannochthoniid species is given.
The specimens examined for this study are preserved in 75% alcohol and deposited in the
Museum of Hebei University (MHBU), Baoding, China, and the
Museum of Southwest University (MSWU), Chongqing, China.
Photographs, drawings, and measurements were taken using a Leica M205A stereomicroscope equipped with a Leica DFC550 camera. Detailed examination was carried out under an Olympus BX53 upright microscope. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was done under high vacuum with a JEOL JSM-IT500 after critical-point drying and gold-palladium coating. The distribution map was made using ArcGIS v. 10.6 (Fig.
Terminology and measurements follow
Family Pseudotyrannochthoniidae Beier, 1932
Chthonius opticus Ellingsen, 1907, by original designation.
多毛异伪蝎.
Holotype
: China • ♂; Chongqing Municipality, Wushan County, Dangyang Town, Wushanya; 31°28.356′N, 109°59.172′E; 1740 m a.s.l.; 02 Oct. 2021; Luyu Wang leg. (Fig.
(♂♀). Allochthonius hispidus sp. nov. is most similar to another epigean blind species from China, A. brevitus, but differs from this species in having more carapaceal setae (22–24 (♂), 21 or 22 (♀) for A. hispidus vs 16 (♂♀) for A. brevitus), more cheliceral setae (♂) (10 or 11 vs seven), more numerous chelal fingers teeth (♂) (fixed finger with 26–29 vs 18–20 teeth, movable finger with 22 or 23 vs 17 or 18 teeth), and longer pedipalps (e.g. palpal femur 5.19 (♂), 5.13–5.61 (♀) × vs 4.33–4.73 (♂), 4.79–4.92 (♀) × longer than broad, length 1.09 (♂), 1.18–1.29 (♀) mm vs 0.52–0.57 (♂), 0.64–0.67 (♀) mm; chela length 1.59–1.60 (♂), 1.76–1.84 (♀) mm vs 0.80–0.84 (♂), 0.98–1.01 (♀) mm). It differs from the other blind species in China (A. bainiensis Gao, Hou & Zhang, 2023, A. pandus Gao, Hou & Zhang, 2023, and A. xinqiaoensis Gao, Hou & Zhang, 2023) in having more numerous carapaceal setae (♀) (the latter three with only 14 setae) and the presence of a pair of hirsute pedipalps. It also differs from all blind congeners from Japan (A. yoshizawai Viana & Ferreira, 2021, A. ishikawai Morikawa, 1954, and its subspecies) in having more cheliceral setae (♂) (10 or 11 vs at most seven) and more numerous fixed chelal finger teeth (♂) (26–29 vs at most 17).
The specific name is derived from the Latin word hispidus (hirsute, hairy), which refers to the presence of abundant setae on the chela, palpal femur, and patella.
Adult males (Figs
Allochthonius hispidus sp. nov. A carapace (dorsal view) B left chelicera (dorsal view) C coxae (ventral view) D left chela (lateral view) E left pedipalp (minus chela, dorsal view) F left chela (dorsal view) G male genital area (ventral view) H female genital area (ventral view). Scale bars: 0.20 mm (C–F); 0.10 mm (A, B, G, H).
Allochthonius hispidus sp. nov., holotype male A carapace (dorsal view) B left chelicera (dorsal view), with details of teeth C coxal spines on coxae I (ventral view) D rallum E left chela (lateral view), with details of trichobothrial pattern F left pedipalp (minus chela, dorsal view) G left chela (dorsal view) H leg I (lateral view) I leg IV (lateral view). Scale bars: 0.20 mm.
Adult females (Figs
China (Chongqing).
Spelaeochthonius kubotai Morikawa, 1954, by original designation.
黄老穴伪蝎.
Holotype
: China • ♂; Beijing City, Fangshan District, Shidu Town, Wanglaopu Village, Huanglao Cave; 39°40.916′N, 115°39.041′E; 495 m a.s.l.; 19 Oct. 2021; Nana Zhan leg.; under a stone in the deep zone (Fig.
(♂♀). Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis sp. nov. is most similar to S. wulibeiensis Gao, Hou & Zhang, 2023, but differs from it in having shorter pedipalps (e.g. chela 7.94 (♂), 6.14 (♀) × vs 6.21–6.22 (♂), 5.68 (♀) × longer than broad, length 1.43 (♂), 1.72 (♀) mm vs 1.68–1.74 (♂), 1.76 (♀) mm), 1 additional cheliceral seta (seven vs six), and more numerous fixed chelal finger teeth (29 vs 22–24). It differs from S. yinae Li, 2023 in the number of setae on tergite II (four vs two), smaller body size (e.g. chela 7.94 (♂), 6.14 (♀) × vs 5.93 (♂), 6.30 (♀) × longer than broad, length 1.43 (♂), 1.72 (♀) mm vs 1.72 (♂), 1.89 (♀) mm), and more numerous fixed chelal finger teeth (♂) (29 vs 23).
The species is named after its type locality, Huanglao Cave.
Adult male (Figs
Spelaeochthonius huanglaoensis sp. nov., holotype male A carapace (dorsal view) B left chelicera (dorsal view), with details of teeth C rallum D left chela (lateral view), with details of trichobothrial pattern E left pedipalp (minus chela, dorsal view) F left chela (dorsal view) G leg I (lateral view) H leg IV (lateral view). Scale bars: 0.20 mm.
Adult female (Figs
China (Beijing).
驼梁穴伪蝎.
Holotype
: China • ♀; Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang City, Pingshan County, Tuoliang National Nature Reserve; 38°43.233′N, 113°46.800′E; 1620 m a.s.l.; 13 May. 2018; Xiangbo Guo and Zhaoyi Li leg. (Fig.
(♀). Spelaeochthonius tuoliangensis sp. nov. can be separated from its congeners by its visible eyespots. It is most similar to S. huanglaoensis sp. nov. but differs from it in having shorter pedipalps (e.g. chela 5.48–5.71× vs 6.14× longer than broad, length 1.15–1.20 mm vs 1.72 mm; palpal femur 5.00–5.13× vs 6.00× longer than broad, length 0.77–0.80 mm vs 1.20 mm) and more setae on tergite I (4 vs 2). It differs from the two congeners from China, S. wulibeiensis and S. yinae, in having more setae on tergite I (four vs two) and shorter pedipalps (e.g. chela length 1.15–1.20 mm vs 1.76/1.89 mm; palpal femur 5.00–5.13× vs 6.40/7.26× longer than broad, length 0.77–0.80 mm vs 1.28/1.30 mm).
This species is named after its type locality, Tuoliang National Nature Reserve.
Adult females (male unknown) (Figs
Spelaeochthonius tuoliangensis sp. nov., holotype female A habitus (dorsal view) B carapace (dorsal view) C carapace (lateral view), indicate eyespots (red arrows) D left chelicera (dorsal view) E left chela (lateral view) F female genital area (ventral view). Scale bars: 0.50 mm (A); 0.20 mm (E); 0.10 mm (B–D, F).
Spelaeochthonius tuoliangensis sp. nov., holotype female A carapace (dorsal view) B left chelicera (dorsal view), with details of teeth C rallum D left chela (lateral view), with details of trichobothrial pattern E left pedipalp (minus chela, dorsal view) F left chela (dorsal view) G leg I (lateral view) H leg IV (lateral view). Scale bars: 0.20 mm.
China (Hebei).
The morphology of the coxal spines is an important diagnostic feature that allows to distinguish the two Asian endemic genera: Centrochthonius and Spelaeochthonius (
All 11 currently known Spelaeochthonius species are exclusively found within caves and are completely blind (WPC 2024). Spelaeochthonius tuoliangensis sp. nov. represents the first epigean species of this genus with small eye spots (Fig.
The research on the family Pseudotyrannochthoniidae is still in its infancy in China, with 21 species recorded thus far (Fig.
We are grateful to Dr Xiangbo Guo, Zhaoyi Li, Nana Zhan (Hebei University, Baoding, China) and Dr Luyu Wang (Southwest University, Chongqing, China) for their assistance in the field, to Mr Jianzhou Sun and Ms Mengjiao Xu (Hebei University, Baoding) for the high-resolution SEM images, to Dr Xinping Wang (University Florida, Gainesville, USA) for revising the language and to Dr Fedor Konstantinov, Dr Jason Dunlop, Dr Mark S. Harvey, Dr Robert Forsyth, and the anonymous reviewer for their helpful suggestions that greatly improved this paper.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31872198) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (no. C2021201030).
Conceptualization: Feng Zhang, Yanmeng Hou. Species identification, illustrations and original draft writing: Yanmeng Hou. Review and editing: Feng Zhang, Yanmeng Hou.
Yanmeng Hou https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0059-3419
Feng Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3347-1031
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.