Research Article |
Corresponding author: Mingyi Tian ( mytian168@aliyun.com ) Academic editor: Achille Casale
© 2017 Mingyi Tian.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Tian M (2017) A new highly cave-adapted trechine genus and species from northern Guizhou Province, China (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechinae). ZooKeys 643: 97-108. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.643.11050
|
A remarkable aphaenopsian beetle, a sympatric species of Qianotrechus tenuicollis Uéno, 2000, was newly discovered in Cave Mahuang Dong of Shuanghe Dong cave system, the longest cave system of China in Suiyang County, northern Guizhou Province. To categorize this striking but still unknown species, a new genus and species are proposed: Shuangheaphaenops elegans gen. n., sp. n. Relationships of Shuangheaphaenops and other highly modified aphaenopsian genera from southern China Karsts are discussed.
aphaenopsian, ground beetle, hypogean, southern China Karsts
Guizhou Province and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of southern China hold the largest karstic landscapes in the world (
Members of Sinaphaenops are endemic to southern parts of Guizhou, with only an exception for S. wangorum Uéno & Ran, 1998 which is recorded from both Libo (southernmost Guizhou) and Huanjiang (northernmost Guangxi) counties (
In October, 2016, a cave biodiversity survey was carried out by our team in several counties of Zunyi and Tongren Districts, northern and northeastern Guizhou, in order to collect species of the genera Qianaphaenops Uéno, 2000 and Qianotrechus Uéno, 2000. The result was very satisfactory, leading to increase the number of almost all of the Uéno’s species recorded from these areas. In addition, an unexpected single male beetle and an elytral debris of the same species were collected in a limestone cave belonging to Shuanghe Dong cave system, Suiyang County. This extremely troglobiomorphic aphaenopsian beetle looks like a Uenotrechus species at first sight on its fore body (head and thorax), but the hind part (elytra) is more likely similar to a Dongodytes (s. str.) species. It has three pairs of supraorbital setiferous setae on head and lacks lateromarginal setae on pronotum. It is also different from Sinaphaenops Uéno & Wang although its first and second male protarsomeres are dilated and spurred inward apically, a sexual modification appeared also in some Sinaphaenops species. Far more important, its elytral chaetotaxy is not similar to any other aphaenopsian genera mentioned above. Therefore, this interesting beetle represents a peculiar lineage within Chinese hypogean trechines. Here we describe this remarkable species, the first highly cave-adapted aphaenopsian species from northern Guizhou Province.
As the longest cave system in China, Shuanghe Dong is connected by 42 caves or entrances, with total length coming up to 186.33 km (
The single blind beetle and the elytral debris for this study were collected by the naked eye using an aspirator inside the cave Mahuang Dong, and kept in 50% ethanol before study. Other cave beetles used for comparing were dry and mounted specimens of the insect collection of South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China (SCAU).
Dissections and observations were made under a Leica S8AP0 microscope. Dissected genital pieces, including the median lobe and parameres of the aedeagus, were glued onto small transparent plastic plates and pinned under the specimen. Habitus pictures were taken by means of a Keyence VHX-5000 digital microscope. Genital pictures were taken using a Canon EOS 40D camera connected to a Zeiss AX10 microscope, and then stacked and processed using Adobe Photoshop CS5 software. Distribution maps were drawn using Mapinfo software.
The length of the body was measured from the apex of the right mandible (in open position) or from labrum to the elytral apex; the width of the body was taken as the maximum width of the elytra.
Abbreviations of other measurements used in the text are as follows:
HLm length of head including mandibles, from apex of right mandible to neck constriction
HLl length of head excluding mandibles, from front of labrum to occipital suture
HW maximum width of head
PrL length of prothorax, along the median line
PnL length of pronotum, as long as PrL
PrW maximum width of prothorax
PnW maximum width of pronotum
PfW width of pronotum at front
PbW width of pronotum at base
EL length of elytra, from base of scutellum to elytral apex
EW maximum width of combined elytra
Shuangheaphaenops elegans sp. n.
Large sized blind beetles, fore body evidently elongated and as long as elytra, shape intermediate between Uenotrechus and Dongodytes species, presence of three pairs of supraorbital setae on head, two dorsal and preapical pores on elytra, the first and second protarsomeres in male distinctly modified.
Highly modified aphaenopsian trechines, fore part (head and thorax) of the body somewhat similar to Uenotrechus Deuve & Tian, 1999, while hind part (elytra) to Dongodytes Deuve, 1993; large sized, with body and appendages thin and very elongate, fore body almost as long as hind part; three pairs of supraorbital setiferous pores present on head, with the posterior two pairs very close to each other; mandibles thin and elongated, feebly curved apically, longer than width of head, right mandible edentate though two vanished teeth can be faintly traced; labial suture moderately defined, separating of mentum and submentum, with the former bisetose and the latter 6-setose; mental tooth simple and thin, basal foveae quite narrow; antennae very long, the 10th and 11th antennomeres extending over apical margin of elytra. Prothorax dolioform, propleura distinctly tumid at basal half, evidently visible from above; pronotum barrel-shaped, distinctly elongated, longer than head excluding mandibles, narrower than head; without lateromarginal setae. Elytra similar to those of Dongodytes (s. str.) Deuve, 1993, narrowed anteriorly and dilated posteriorly, side margins narrowly bordered throughout, shoulders lacking; striae lacking though easily traceable; presence of two dorsal and preapical setiferous pores; the 1st pore in the humeral group of the marginal umbilicate series not transversely and backwardly shifted, the 5th and 6th pores in the middle group widely spaced. Protibia smooth, without longitudinal sulcus; the 1st and 2nd protarsomeres in male dilated and inwardly spurred at apices. Abdominal ventrites sparsely pubescent, each of ventrites IV-VII in male bisetose apically. Male genitalia moderately sclerotized, small, strongly curved ventrally in lateral view, with a quite large sagittal aileron; apical lobe very thin in dorsal view; parameres well developed, but much shorter than median lobe.
Shuangheaphaenops can not be included in any lineage of the highly modified aphaenopsian genera known in southern China regarding to the peculiar morphological characteristics mentioned above, such as the peculiar facies and configuration of the body (which is more or less similar to Uenotrechus Deuve & Tian, 1999 in fore body, but to Dongodytes Deuve, 1993 in elytra), vanished bidentate right mandible, and chaetotaxal patterns in which there are three pairs of supraorbital setiferous pores on head, lack of lateromarginal setae on pronotum, and unique pattern on elytral marginal umbilicate series, in particular, the humeral and middle groups.
Apart from the similarity in elytra and antennae between Shuangheaphaenops and Dongodytes (s. str.) which occurs only in northern Guangxi where is far distant from Cave Shuanghe Dong in northern Guizhou, the following characteristics are different: (1) head subparallel-sided, with three pairs of supraorbital setiferous pores, right mandibular teeth bidentate but almost vanished in Shuangheaphaenops (versus triangular shaped in general, presence of two pairs of supraorbital pores, and well-marked tridentate teeth on right mandible in Dongodytes); (2) the 1st and 2nd protarsomeres of male distinctly modified in Shuangheaphaenops (indistinctly or not modified in Dongodytes); (3) pronotum much slender and lack of lateromarginal setae in Shuangheaphaenops (versus stouter and presence of lateromarginal setae in Dongodytes); and (4) the middle group (the 5th and 6th pores) of the marginal unbilicate series on elytra widely spaced each other in Shuangheaphaenops (versus close to each other in Dongodytes).
The fore body of this new genus is more or less similar to that of Uenotrechus Deuve & Tian, 1999, but Shuangheaphaenops has a slenderer head bearing three pairs of supraorbital setiferous pores, reduced bidentate teeth of right mandible, and much longer antennae (versus bearing two pairs of supraorbital setiferous pores, mandibular teeth well-defined and clearly tridentate, and shorter antennae in Uenotrechus), and pronotum without lateromarginal setae (versus with pair of lateromarginal setae in Uenotrechus). In addition, head and elytra are glabrous in Shuangheaphaenops (versus whole body densely pubescent in Uenotrechus), the 1st pore of the marginal umbilicate series is located before the 2nd in Shuangheaphaenops (versus transversely shifted inwards and backwards, at level behind the 2nd pore in Uenotrechus), and both the 1st and 2nd protarsomeres in male are modified in Shuangheaphaenops (versus not modified in Uenotrechus).
“Shuanghe + Aphaenops”. To indicate that the highly modified trechine genus occurs in Shuanghe Dong, the longest cave system in China.
Male, Cave Mahuang Dong, Shuanghe Dong cave system, Wenquan Zhen, Suiyang County, 28°14'32"N, 107°17'24"E, 720 m, X-18-2016, leg. Wenbo Li, deposited in the insect collection of South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China (SCAU); additional material: an elytral debris, same cave and collecting date as above, leg. Mingruo Tang, in SCAU.
A large-sized, eyeless cave trechine beetle, highly modified in morphology, with very elongated and slender body which is about four times longer than wide, fore body about as long as elytra, antennae as long as body including mandibles, extending beyond elytral apex; body glabrous, except for basal half of pronotum which is covered with erected setae.
Length: 7.9 mm (from apex of right mandibles to elytral apex) or 7.2 mm (from labrum to elytra); width: 1.79 mm. Fore body (including mandibles) longer than elytra, (HLm+PrL)/EL = 1.07. Habitus as in Fig.
Yellowish brown, a little darker on head, pronotum and basal half of elytra, pale on antennae, mouthparts, palps and tarsi. Moderately shiny. Head and elytra glabrous, pronotum glabrous on apical half (but with two or three short setae near middle of frontal margin) but pubescent on basal half. Underside of head and prothorax glabrous (Fig.
Head (Fig.
Prothorax shorter than head including mandibles (PrL/HLm = 0.80), but longer than head excluding mandibles (PrL/HLl = 1.17), widest at about 1/4 from base, twice as long as wide (PrL/PrW = 2.10), slightly wider than head (PrW/HW = 1.09), evidently wider than pronotum (PrW/PnW = 1.22), half as wide as elytra (PrW/EW = 0.49). Pronotum elongate, dolioform, two and half times longer than wide (PnL/PnW = 2.46), evidently narrower than head (PnW/HW = 0.89), base slightly wider than front (PbW/PfW = 1.09); lateral sides finely bordered throughout, base and front unbordered; nearly parallel-sided, fairly expanded at the widest part which is at about 3/7 from base, slightly sinuate before hind angles which are nearly rectangular, fore angle obtuse; median line well-marked, basal transversal impression very short; front slightly convex, base feebly concave. Scutellum fairly small.
Elytra (Fig.
Legs thin and long, bearing short pubescence; fore- and middle femora sparsely setose; fore tibia smooth, without longitudinal furrow or sulcus; the 1st tarsomere shorter than, as long as, and longer than the 2nd–4th tarsomeres together in fore, middle, and hind legs, respectively.
Male genitalia (Fig.
To indicate the slender shape of this beautiful aphaenopsian beetle.
China (Guizhou: Suiyang) (Fig.
Mahuang Dong (Figs
I am so grateful to our team members, Jujian Chen, Mingruo Tang and Pingjing Yang (SCAU), and Wenbo Li (College of Life Science, Anhui University), for their great efforts during the cave biological survey in northern and northeastern Guizhou. In particular, I thank Dr. Thierry Deuve (National Museum of Natural History, Paris) and Dr. Arnaud Faille (Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Munich) for their comments and suggestions that were helpful to improve the manuscript. This study is sponsored by a project of the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant no. 20134404110026).