Research Article |
Corresponding author: Kyoji Fujiwara ( kyojifujiwara627@yahoo.co.jp ) Academic editor: Sven Kullander
© 2023 Kyoji Fujiwara, Hiroyuki Motomura, Gento Shinohara.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Fujiwara K, Motomura H, Shinohara G (2023) Opistognathus ctenion (Perciformes, Opistognathidae): a new jawfish from southern Japan. ZooKeys 1179: 353-364. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1179.109813
|
Opistognathus ctenion sp. nov. (Perciformes: Opistognathidae) is described on the basis of three specimens (17.3–30.6 mm in standard length) collected from the Osumi and Ryukyu islands, southern Japan in depths of 35–57 m. Although most similar to Opistognathus triops, recently described from Tonga and Vanuatu, the new species differs in mandibular pore arrangement, dorsal- and caudal-fin coloration, fewer gill rakers, and lacks blotches or stripes on the snout, suborbital region and both jaws.
Actinopterygii, dredge, new species, Osumi Islands, Ryukyu Islands, taxonomy
Opistognathus Cuvier, 1816 is the most speciose genus of jawfishes (Perciformes: Opistognathidae), being distributed worldwide in tropical and temperate regions, except for the eastern Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea (
Examination of specimens in the
Kagoshima University Museum, Japan (
Counts and measurements followed
Photographs of preserved specimens were taken with a Nikon D850 camera using an internal focus bracketing function; sets of multifocal images were then collated into a composite image, using Adobe Photoshop. The distribution map was prepared using GMT ver. 5.3.1, with data from GSHHG (
Morphological characters of comparative species of Opistognathus are cited from
Holotype.
A species of Opistognathus distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: posterior end of upper jaw rigid, without flexible lamina; dorsal-fin rays XI, 16–18; anterior dorsal-fin spines very stout and straight, and their distal ends not transversely forked; anal-fin rays II, 17; gill rakers 6 or 7 + 13 or 14 = 20 or 21; vertebrae 10 + 22 = 32; longitudinal scale rows c. 40–50; lateral line terminating below 4th–6th soft ray of dorsal fin; 4th and 5th mandibular pore positions usually included 2 and 6–7 pores, respectively; body scales absent anterior to vertical below 4th or 5th dorsal-fin spine; vomerine teeth 2; body reddish-brown with 3 or 4 longitudinal rows of c. 8–10 whitish blotches; cheek and opercle with five or six whitish blotches; snout, suborbital region, and both jaws without blotches or stripes; spinous dorsal fin with ocellus between 2nd to 5th spines; dorsal-fin soft-rayed portion with two reddish-orange stripes; pectoral-fin base with one or two whitish blotches; caudal fin uniformly faint orange or reddish-yellow.
General appearance of type specimens as in Figs
Holotype | Paratype | Paratype | |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Standard length (mm; SL) | 30.6 | 26.2 | 17.3 |
Counts | |||
Dorsal-fin rays | XI, 16 | XI, 18 | XI, 18 |
Anal-fin rays | II, 17 | II, 17 | II, 17 |
Total pectoral-fin rays | 19 (left) / 19 (right) | 19 / 19 | 19 / – |
Pelvic-fin rays | I, 5 | I, 5 | I, 5 |
Procurrent caudal-fin rays | 5 + 5 | 5 + 5 | – |
Branched caudal-fin rays | 12 | – | – |
Segmented caudal-fin rays | 8 + 8 = 16 | 8 + 8 = 16 | 8 + 8 = 16 |
Longitudinal scale rows | c. 40–50 | c. 40–50 | – |
Vertebrae | 10 + 22 = 32 | 10 + 22 = 32 | 10 + 22 = 32 |
Gill rakers | 7 + 13 / 7 + 14 = 20 / 21 | 6 + 14 / 6 + 14 = 20 / 20 | – / 7 + 14 = 21 |
Measurements (% SL) | |||
Pre-dorsal-fin length | 32.3 | 32.5 | 35.1 |
Pre-anal-fin length | 63.3 | 59.7 | 65.1 |
Dorsal-fin base length | 62.9 | 63.5 | 59.8 |
Anal-fin base length | 34.3 | 37.0 | 34.2 |
Pelvic-fin length | 22.6 | 21.1 | 21.7 |
Caudal-fin length | 20.9 | 23.2 | 22.2 |
Body depth | 15.3 | 16.0 | 10.3 |
Caudal-peduncle depth | 7.9 | 8.0 | 6.5 |
Head length | 32.3 | 31.9 | 34.3 |
Postorbital length | 19.8 | 20.5 | 19.1 |
Upper-jaw length | 17.4 | 17.2 | 17.4 |
Postorbital-jaw length | 6.8 | 5.5 | 4.3 |
Orbit diameter | 10.0 | 10.5 | 11.2 |
As % of head length | |||
Postorbital length | 61.3 | 64.2 | 55.6 |
Upper-jaw length | 53.9 | 53.8 | 50.8 |
Postorbital-jaw length | 21.2 | 17.3 | 12.5 |
Orbit diameter | 30.9 | 32.8 | 32.7 |
Three-dimensional reconstruction of head and anterior body in Opistognathus ctenion (
Head and body. Body elongate, compressed anteriorly, progressively more compressed posteriorly. Anus situated just before anal-fin origin. Head cylindrical, its profile rounded. Eyes somewhat large, located dorsolaterally. Anterior nostril a short membranous tube with a tiny tentacle on posterior rim, when depressed not reaching posterior nostril; situated about mid-way between posterior nostril and dorsal margin of upper lip. Posterior nostril opening elliptical. Mouth terminal, obliquely inclined anterodorsally, forming angle of c. 20° with body axis. Anterior tip of upper jaw slightly before vertical through lower-jaw tip. Posterior margins of preopercle and opercle indistinct, covered with skin and generally rounded with slightly elongated flap on upper part, respectively. Gill opening wide, its uppermost point slightly below horizontal through dorsal margin of orbit in lateral view.
Lateral line system. Cephalic sensory pores moderately developed, covering most of head except for lower part of cheek and area adjacent to dorsal-fin origin. Mandibular pore positions 1 and 2 each with a single similarly-sized pore; position 3 with a single pore (largest size of mandibular pores); positions 4 and 5 with 1 (only left side of
Scales. Scales mostly missing, scaled area and scale counts estimated from scale pockets. Lateral surface of body and belly scaled, except above and slightly below lateral line, area anterior to vertical below 4th (
Fins. Dorsal fin moderately low, its profile relatively uniform except for anterior part and slightly notched junction of spinous and segmented rays; 1st dorsal-fin spine distinctly short, its base located between uppermost point of gill opening and posteriormost tip of flap on opercle; all dorsal rays branched distally. Anal fin of similar height to dorsal fin, its origin vertically level with base of 1st (
Osteological features. Nasal short, tube-like. Vomer rhombic, with two tiny conical teeth anteriorly. Lateral ethmoid somewhat broad, articulating with 1st infraorbital and palatine ventrally. Palatine robust anteriorly, tapering posteriorly, without teeth. Infraorbitals relatively slender, comprising 5 elements, including dermosphenotic; 1st infraorbital longest, 3rd with suborbital shelf, 5th (= dermosphenotic) firmly attached to sphenotic. Basisphenoid crescentic. Frontal tapering anteriorly, 6 large dorsal openings for sensory canal from anteriormost tip to lateral aspect. Left and right parietals separated by supraoccipital. Anterior and posterior tips of supraoccipital strongly pointed. Sphenotic not expanded. Supratemporals associated with parietal and pterotic.
Premaxilla with a single row of conical teeth, except for posterior end. Maxilla long, posteriorly broadly expanded with slightly rounded corners. Supramaxilla small, on upper posterior end of maxilla. Dentary with a single row of conical teeth; 5 large ventral openings (including on posterior tip) from mandibular sensory canal. Anguloarticular large, its anterior projection fitting into dentary notch; coronoid process strongly pointed, directed anterodorsally. Retroarticular small, on ventroposterior corner of anguloarticular. Hyomandibular broadly attached to sphenotic and pterotic. Ectopterygoid and symplectic slender. Entopterygoid forming a large shelf. Metapterygoid and quadrate present but poorly resolved, Opercle with 2 strong and 1 weak ridge. Preopercle with 5 large openings from preopercular sensory canal. Subopercle small, its anterior tip pointed. Interopercle triangular, size similar to subopercle. Six long recurved branchiostegal rays.
Posttemporal L-shaped, forked, dorsal limb articulating with epiotic, an opening on posterior corner. Supracleithrum rod-like. Cleithrum with a large dorsal blade, receiving supracleithrum. Dorsal postcleithrum rectangular, articulating with cleithrum and scapula. Ventral postcleithrum long, narrow. Scapula widely separated from coracoid. Pectoral-fin radials comprising 4 elements, lowermost distinctly largest. Supraneural bone absent. Anterior dorsal- and anal fin interdigitation patterns //1/1+1/1/ and //1+1/1/1/1/, respectively.
Fresh coloration of holotype and
Fresh coloration of
Color in alcohol. Head and body generally blackish-gray. Ventral part of head and belly white. Whitish blotches on cheek, opercle, and pectoral-fin base (in fresh condition) faded, traces of blotches on body represented by non-pigmented areas. Spinous dorsal fin generally blackish-gray, an ocellus apparent (with hyaline white edge), but longitudinal row of white spots faded. Soft-rayed part of dorsal and anal fins hyaline, reddish-orange stripes (in fresh condition) retained as blackish-gray stripes. Pelvic-fin rays white, membrane hyaline with melanophores. Pectoral and caudal fins uniformly translucent white.
The specific name is a noun in apposition derived from the Greek diminutive κτενίον, meaning “a small comb”. It refers to the low gill raker numbers in the new species, one of the lowest recorded for Indo-Pacific species of Opistognathus (see below).
Opistognathus ctenion keys out to couplet 25 in
The total of 20 or 21 gill rakers in O. ctenion is one of the lowest among the Indo-Pacific species of Opistognathus, with only two species sharing similar counts [viz., Opistognathus albomaculatus Smith-Vaniz, 2023 with 19–22 gill rakers; and Opistognathus reticulatus (McKay, 1969) with 21–23; see
We are especially grateful to K. Kubota (Kagoshima University), S. Ohtsuka and Y. Kondo (Hiroshima University), Captain K. Nakaguchi and the crew of the R/V Toyoshio-maru for their assistance in collecting the specimens of the new species; S. Nomura, T. Kutsuna and Y. Shigeta (
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for JSPS Fellows to KF (PD: 22J01404); JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 20H03311 and 21H03651, the JSPS Core-to-Core CREPSUM JPJSCCB20200009, and the “Establishment of Glocal Research and Education Network in the Amami Islands” project of Kagoshima University adopted by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan to HM; and the Integrated Research Program “Geological, Biological, and Anthropological Histories in Relation to the Kuroshio Current” of the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba (2016–2021) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K01009 to GS.
K.F. was responsible for the study design, generation and analysis of the data, and wrote the original draft manuscript. H.M. and G.S. were responsible for field work, generation and analysis of data, and review and editing of the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript and approved the final version.
Kyoji Fujiwara https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-8333
Hiroyuki Motomura https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7448-2482
Gento Shinohara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-9239
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.