Research Article
Print
Research Article
Balitora anlongensis, the first cavefish species of the genus Balitora (Teleostei, Balitoridae) from Guizhou Province, southwest China
expand article infoTao Luo‡, Zhi-Xia Chen‡, Xin-Rui Zhao‡, Jing Yu‡, Chang-Ting Lan‡, Jia-Jun Zhou§|, Ning Xiao, Jiang Zhou‡
‡ Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
§ Zhejiang Forest Resource Monitoring Center, Hangzhou, China
| Zhejiang Forestry Survey Planning and Design Company Limited, Hangzhou, China
¶ Guiyang Healthcare Vocational University, Guiyang, China

Corresponding author: Tao Luo ( 18786413778@163.com )

Academic editor: Nina Bogutskaya
© 2023 Tao Luo, Zhi-Xia Chen, Xin-Rui Zhao, Jing Yu, Chang-Ting Lan, Jia-Jun Zhou, Ning Xiao, Jiang Zhou.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Luo T, Chen Z-X, Zhao X-R, Yu J, Lan C-T, Zhou J-J, Xiao N, Zhou J (2023) Balitora anlongensis, the first cavefish species of the genus Balitora (Teleostei, Balitoridae) from Guizhou Province, southwest China. ZooKeys 1185: 21-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1185.108545
ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EF709A30-DD19-4CF5-8C2A-E1680C3D42F2
Open Access

Abstract

This work describes a new species, Balitora anlongensis sp. nov., collected from a cave at Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guzihou, China. Phylogenetic trees reconstructed based on two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes show that the new species represents an independent evolutionary lineage with large genetic differences, 7.1%–12.0% in mitochondrial gene cytochrome b and 9.2%–12.1% in cytochrome oxidase subunit 1, from congeners. Morphologically, the new species can be distinguished from the 18 species currently assigned to the genus Balitora by a combination of characters, most clearly by having two pairs of maxillary barbels; 8½ branched dorsal-fin rays; 5½ branched anal-fin rays; pectoral fin not reaching pelvic fin origin; dorsal-fin origin in front of pelvic fin origin; eye small (eye diameter approximately equal to outer maxillary barbel length); and fins lacking pigment in live fish. The new species represents the first record of Balitora inhabiting caves in China and increases the number of species in the genus Balitora in its present concept from 18 to 19. The study suggests that more evidence is needed to further clarify the taxonomic composition of the genus Balitora.

Key words

Nanpanjiang River, stone loach, taxonomy, phylogeny

Introduction

The karst region of southwest China is well known as a distinctive center and hotspot of biodiversity (Myers et al. 2000). Distinctive karst habitats have created varied natural landscapes and organisms, such as cave river ecosystems and the organisms that inhabit them. Cavefishes are typical cave organisms (Niemiller et al. 2019). In China, there are approximately 170 endemic species of cavefishes belonging to two orders (Cypriniformes and Siluriformes) and four families (Cyprinidae, Nemacheilidae, Cobitidae, and Amblycipitidae) (Ma et al. 2019). In previous reports, cavefishes were mainly recorded in the Cyprinidae (83 species), Nemacheilidae (77 species), and Cobitidae (eight species) (Ma et al. 2019) (Suppl. material 1). New discoveries may be possible at the family, genus, and species level, considering that past surveys and reports of cavefishes have mainly focused on Guangxi and Yunnan provinces, China (Ma et al. 2019).

The genus Balitora, Gray, 1830 was established with Balitora brucei as the type species, originally placed in the Cobitidae (Gray, 1830), and is now placed within the Balitoridae (Fricke et al. 2023). Hemimyzon Regan, 1911 and Sinohomaloptera Fang, 1930, which are taxonomically closely related to Balitora, were established using H. formosanum and S. kwangsiensis, respectively, as the type species. The genus Balitora has long been the subject of taxonomic controversy, with different taxonomic schemes proposed based on morphological differences. Chen (1978) recognized one pair of maxillary barbels as a character that distinguishes Balitora from other genera. Later, several new Balitora species were reported, including B. pengi Huang, 1982, B. tchangi Zheng, 1982, B. nujiangensis Zhang & Zheng, 1983, and B. elongata Chen & Li, 1985 (Zheng et al. 1982; Zheng and Zhang 1983; Li and Chen 1985), which are currently placed in the genus Hemimyzon (Kottelat and Chu 1988). Kottelat and Chu (1988) and Kottelat (1988) reviewed the genus and considered Sinohomaloptera to be a synonym of Balitora as having one or two pairs of maxillary barbels. Based on three or more unbranched pelvic fin rays, B. pengi, B. tchangi, B. nujiangensis, and B. elongata were placed in Hemimyzon, while species with two branched pelvic fin rays were placed in Balitora, namely B. lancangjiangensis (Zheng, 1980), B. kwangsiensis (Fang, 1930), and B. longibarbata (Chen, 1982) (Kottelat and Chu 1988). Chen (1990) accepted this suggestion for a taxonomic revision of the species distributed in Yunnan. However, the suggestion of Kottelat and Chu (1988) was not adopted by Chinese scholars, and species were still placed in Balitora based on the number of maxillary barbel, and Sinohomaloptera was considered valid (Chen and Tang 2000; Jiang et al. 2016). Nevertheless, previous morphology-based studies have not resolved the phylogenetic relationships between Balitora, Hemimyzon and Sinohomaloptera due to a lack of molecular evidence.

Few molecular markers have been used to assess the phylogeny of the genus Balitora. A phylogenetic tree reconstructed by Šlechtová et al. (2007) based on the nuclear gene RAG1 showed that a species identified as Balitora sp. cf. burmanica showed that the genus Balitora is nested within the genus Homaloptera. The phylogeny of Liu et al. (2012a) based on mitochondrial (COI and ND4+ND5) and nuclear genes (RH1, RAG1, EGR2B, and IRBP), on the other hand, supports the view that Balitora (S. kwangsiensis) is close to Sinogastromyzon. Kumkar et al. (2016a) used two mitochondria (COI and Cyt b) to show for the first time phylogenetically that Balitora is not a monophyletic, but can be divided into three major clades. Keskar et al. (2018) then supported Balitora as a sister clade of Lepidocephalichthys based on mitochondrial COI and Cyt b. Tao et al. (2019) recovered Balitora (only B. elongata) as a sister clade of Sinohomaloptera (only S. kwangsiensis) based on a large-scale phylogeny of one mitochondrial and 14 nuclear genes. More recently, a phylogeny based on the mitochondrial genome (only B. ludongensis Liu & Chen, 2012) strongly support Balitora being close to ((Jinshaia + Lepturichthys) + Sinogastromyzon) (Shao et al. 2020). Based on the above various studies, it can be concluded that the phylogenetic position of the genus Balitora is unclear and may not be monophyletic.

To date, the classification of the genus remains controversial, mainly because of the lack of clear phylogenetic relationships and stable morphological characters among Balitora, Hemimyzon, and Sinohomaloptera (Table 1). In this study, we followed the latest taxonomic scheme after a comprehensive review, and Balitora was recorded with 19 species (Table 1), of which ten species are distributed in China, namely B. brucei Gray, 1830, B. burmanica Hora, 1932, B. elongata, B. kwangsiensis, B. lancangjiangensis, B. longibarbata, B. ludongensis, B. nantingensis Chen, Cui & Yang, 2005, B. meridionalis Kottelat, 1988, and B. tchangi (Liu et al. 2012b; Jiang et al. 2016) (Table 1). However, because this work did not have access to the original data for the four species (B. haithanhi, B. nigrocorpa, B. vanlani, and B. vanlongi) described by Nguyen (2005), as well as because B. haithanhi Nguyen, 2005, B. nigrocorpa Nguyen, 2005, and B. vanlani Nguyen, 2005 were used as synonyms of B. kwangsiensis and B. vanlongi was used as a synonym of B. lancangjiangensis (Kottelat 2012, 2013), considering that there are no significant morphological differences between them, together with the fact that these four species are from Vietnam, they are unlikely to be conspecific (Bhoite et al. 2012). Thus, these four species were excluded from the diagnosis of the new species (Conway and Mayden 2010; Bhoite et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2012a). To date, no cave species have been discovered within the genus Balitora.

Table 1.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Taxonomic revision history of 19 species of the genus Balitora distributed in Asia. Species in bold are those which have a distribution in China.

ID # Species Kottelat and Chu 1988a Chen and Tang 2000 Kottelat 2012 Jiang et al. 2016 Zhang and Zhao 2016 Fricke et al. 2023 Zhang and Cao 2021 This study
1 Balitora annamitica Kottelat, 1988 – – Balitora – – Balitora – Balitora
2 Balitora brucei Gray, 1830 – – Balitora Balitora – Balitora Balitora Balitora
3 Balitora burmanica Hora, 1932 – – Balitora Balitora – Balitora Balitora Balitora
4 Balitora chipkali Kumkar, Katwate, Raghavan & Dahanukar, 2016 – – – – – Balitora – Balitora
5 Balitora eddsi Conway & Mayden, 2010 – – Balitora – – Balitora – Balitora
6 Balitora elongata Chen & Li, 1985 Hemimyzon Balitora Hemimyzon Balitora Balitora Hemimyzon Balitora Balitora
7 Balitora haithanhi Nguyen, 2005 – – ? Balitora haithanhi – – Balitora – Balitora
8 Balitora jalpalli Raghavan, Tharian, Ali, Jadhav & Dahanukar, 2013 – – – – – Balitora – Balitora
9 Balitora kwangsiensis (Fang, 1930) Balitora – Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora
10 Balitora lancangjiangensis (Zheng, 1980) Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora
11 Balitora laticauda Bhoite, Jadhav & Dahanukar, 2012 – – Balitora – – Balitora – Balitora
12 Balitora longibarbata (Chen, 1982) Balitora – Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora
13 Balitora ludongensis Liu & Chen, 2012 – – Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora Balitora
14 Balitora meridionalis Kottelat, 1988 – – Balitora Balitora – Balitora Balitora Balitora
15 Balitora mysorensis Hora, 1941 – – Balitora – – Balitora – Balitora
16 Balitora nantingensis Chen, Cui & Yang, 2005 – – Balitora Balitora – Balitora Balitora Balitora
17 Balitora vanlani Nguyen, 2005 – – ? Balitora vanlani – – Balitora – Balitora
18 Balitora vanlongi Nguyen, 2005 – – ? Balitora vanlongi – – Balitora – Balitora
19 Balitora tchangi Zheng, 1982 Hemimyzon Balitora Hemimyzon Balitora Balitora Hemimyzon Balitora Balitora

In January 2023 during a survey of cavefishes in southwestern Guizhou Province, upper Pearl River, China, a number of specimens of the genus Balitora were collected, identified by two pairs of maxillary barbels. Morphological examination and molecular phylogenetic analysis suggested that these specimens can be distinguished from all other species presently assigned to the genus Balitora. Here, we describe these specimens as a new species, Balitora anlongensis sp. nov.

Materials and methods

Sampling

This work collected a total of 30 specimens from three species for morphological comparison and genetic analysis (Figs 1, 2). Among these specimens, 11 specimens representing a new species, Balitora anlongensis sp. nov., were from Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guzihou, China; two specimens were B. ludongensis from Ludong Town, Jingxi County, Guangxi, China; and three specimens were B. kwangsiensis from Amojiang River basin, Yunnan, China. All specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and later transferred to 75% ethanol for preservation. Muscle samples used for molecular analysis were preserved in 95% alcohol and stored at −20 °C. All specimens were kept at Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China.

Figure 1. 

Sampling collection location of Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. and distribution of 21 species of the genus Balitora (including B. haithanhi, B. nigrocorpa, B. vanlani, and B. vanlongi) in Asia. Species codes are provided in Table 1.

Figure 2. 

Distribution and hydrology of the type locality of the new species Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. (red), B. kwangsiensis (blue), B. longibarbata (purple), and B. ludongensis (red), in the Pearl River basin, Southwest China.

DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from muscle tissue using a DNA extraction kit from Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Five tissue samples used for molecular analysis were amplified and sequenced for two mitochondrial gene and three nuclear genes: mitochondrial gene cytochrome b (Cyt b), cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI), recombination activating gene 1 (RAG1), interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP), and early growth response protein 2B (EGR2B). Primer sequences are shown in Suppl. material 2. PCR amplifications were performed in a 20-μl reaction volume with the following cycling conditions: an initial denaturing step at 95 °C for 4 min, 35 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 52 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified with spin columns. The products were sequenced on an ABI Prism 3730 automated DNA sequencer at Chengdu TSING KE Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). All newly obtained sequences have been submitted to GenBank (Table 2).

Table 2.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Localities, voucher information, and GenBank numbers for all samples used in this study. Bold sequences are new from this study.

ID Family/ species Locality (* type localities) Voucher Cyt b COI RAG1 IRBP EGR2B
Balitoridae
1 Hemimyzon yaotanensis Mudong, Chongqing City, China IHB0809019 JN176994 – JN177053 – –
2 Sinogastromyzon szechuanensis Neijiang, Sichuan Province, China 20170920BB03 MN241814 MN241814 – – –
3 Sinogastromyzon hsiashiensis Taoyuan, Hunan Province, China IHB1004171/IHB030105 JN176997 JN177109 JN177054 – –
4 Lepturichthys dolichopterus Jianou, Fujian Province, China IHB0706070 GU084245 JN177091 JN177029 – –
5 Lepturichthys fimbriata Jinkou, Hubei Province, China IHB0803128 GU084229 JN177102 JN177182 JN177272 JN177251
6 Sinogastromyzon nantaiensis Taiwan Province, China ASIZP0806662 – KU943003 – – –
7 Sinogastromyzon puliensis – – FJ605359 FJ605359 – – –
8 Metahomaloptera omeiensis Mudong, Chongqing City, China IHB0301071 JN177000 JN177080 JN177041
9 Sinogastromyzon sichangensis Cishui, Guizhou Province, China IHB0400184 JN176998 JN177078 JN177040 KP695068 KP694496
10 Sinogastromyzon sichangensis – P4 OQ754146 – OQ754160 OQ754156 OQ754151
11 Jinshaia sinensis Chongqing City, China IHB0301068 JN176985 JN177117 JN177044 – –
12 Jinshaia abbreviata Guizhou Province, China IHB0709424 JN176992 JN177228 JN177180 JN177274 JN177249
13 Lepturichthys fimbriata Mudong, Chongqing City, China IHB0301070 JN176942 JN177139 JN177020 JN177273 –
14 Hemimyzon formosanus – cyp903 AY392484 KU943001 – KP695096 –
15 Hemimyzon taitungensis Taiwan Province, China – KX056121 – – – –
16 Balitora ludongensis Jingxi City, Guangxi Province, China GZNU20230215023 OQ754141 – – – –
17 Balitora ludongensis Jingxi City, Guangxi Province, China GZNU20230215024 OQ754142 – – – –
18 Balitora ludongensis Jingxi City, Guangxi Province, China SCAU-20190805001 MT157616 MT157616 – – –
19 Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guzihou, China* GZNU20230215018 OQ754144 OQ784688 OQ754158 OQ754154 OQ754149
20 Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guzihou, China* GZNU20230215019 OQ754145 OQ784690 OQ754159 OQ754155 OQ754150
21 Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guzihou, China* GZNU20230215020 OQ754143 OQ784689 OQ754157 OQ754152 OQ754148
22 Sinogastromyzon wui Zhaoping, Guangxi Province, China IHB0400321 JN177001 JN177076 – – –
23 Hemimyzon nujiangensis Nujiang, Yunnan Province, China / – KM610757 – – –
24 Hemimyzon nujiangensis Nujiang, Yunnan Province, China ihb201305588 – KM610756 – – –
25 Sinogastromyzon tonkinensis Yuanjiang, Yunnan Province, China IHB0805543 JN177002 JN177074 JN177056 JN177277 JN177247
26 Balitora brucei – CIFEFGB-Bb-02 MK732323 MK388804 – – –
27 Balitora brucei – HSLBB – KJ774109 – – –
28 Balitora annamitica – – – – EF056359 – –
29 Balitora mysorensis India, Karnataka, Hattihole WILD-15-PIS-231 KU378018 KU378005 – – –
30 Balitora mysorensis India, Karnataka, Hattihole BNHS FWF 197 KU378019 KU378006 – – –
31 Balitora chipkali India, Karnataka, Ramnagar BNHS FWF 193 KU378016 KU378003 – – –
32 Balitora chipkali India, Karnataka, Kamra, Joida WILD-15-PIS-230 KU378017 KU378004 – – –
33 Balitora jalpalli / KUFOS-19-AN-BA-34.1 – MT216524 – – –
34 Balitora laticauda India, Maharashtra, Venegaon WILD-12-PIS-019 KU378007 KU377994 – – –
35 Balitora laticauda India, Maharashtra, Venegaon ZSI-WRC P/2849 KU378008 KU377995 – – –
36 Balitora elongata Menglun, Yunnan Province, China IHB0301053 DQ105218 – – – –
37 Balitora elongata Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China IHB0301030 DQ105217 – – – –
38 Balitora meridionalis – – – – KP322550
39 Balitora kwangsiensis Yuanjiang, Yunnan Province, China IHB0805545 JN177004 – JN177060 – –
40 Balitora kwangsiensis GZNU20230215022 OQ754147 OQ754161 OQ754153 –
41 Balitora elongata / cyp74 – – KP695617 KP695065 –
42 Balitora kwangsiensis Yuanjiang, Yunnan Province, China IHB0805546 JN177006 JN177071 JN177058
43 Balitora kwangsiensis Yuanjiang, Yunnan Province, China IHB0805547 JN177005 JN177072 JN177059 JN177276 JN177248
44 Balitora kwangsiensis / / DQ105216 – – – –
45 Homaloptera bilineata – – – – KP322549 – –
46 Homaloptera confuzona – CBM:ZF 11705 NC_033955 NC_033955 KP322543 – –
47 Homaloptera parclitella – – NC_031634 NC_031634 EU409610 EU409668 EU409732
48 Homaloptera ocellata CBM:ZF 12287 NC_033953 NC_033953 KP322539 – –
49 Homaloptera ogilviei – – NC_031635 NC_031635 – – –
50 Pseudohomaloptera leonardi – – AB242165 AB242165 EU711130 FJ197076 AB531164
51 Pseudohomaloptera sexmaculata – – – ON903153 KP322545 – –
52 Balitoropsis ophiolepis – Vial 2006-0588 – KR052868 KP322540 – –
53 Balitoropsis zollingeri – Vial 2005-0948 – KR052865 KP322535 – –
54 Bhavania australis – KUFOS.2019.12.54 MT002547 MT002512 MT002571 – –
55 Homaloptera montana – NBFGR:8118E – HQ219123 – – –
56 Travancoria elongata – – – MT216535 – – –
57 Travancoria jonesi – KUFOS-19-AN-TR-49.1 – MT216539 – – –
58 Ghatsa montana – KUFOS-19-RR-GA-39.1 – MT216529 – – –
59 Ghatsa santhamparaiensis – KUFOS-19-AN-GA-42.1 – MT216532 – – –
60 Ghatsa pillaii – KUFOS-19-AN-GA-40.1 – MT216530 – – –
61 Homalopteroides smithi – CBM:ZF 12281 NC_033957 NC_033957 KP322546 – –
62 Homalopterula gymnogaster – Vial SN25 – – KP322554 – –
63 Neohomaloptera johorensis – CBM:ZF 12286 NC_033952 NC_033952 – – –
Gastromyzontidae
64 Beaufortia liui Panzhihua, Sichuan Province, China IHB1004172 JN177009 JN177069 – – –
65 Beaufortia szechuanensis Zhaotong, Yunna Province, China IHB0709025 JN177007 JN177067 JN177061 JN177281 JN177253
66 Formosania chenyiyui Changting, Fujia Province, China IHB0301051 MK135435 MK135435 – – –
67 Vanmanenia caldwelli Wuyishan, Fujian Province, China IHB0706028 JN177011 JN177232 JN177178 JN177280 JN177252
Catostomidae
68 Myxocyprinus asiaticus Mudong, Chongqing City, China IHB0809033 JN176936 – JN177063 – JN177263

Phylogenetic analyses

A total of 168 sequences (48 Cyt b, 55 COI, 36 RAG1, 18 IRBP, and 17 EGR2B sequences) was used for molecular analysis, including 30 newly sequenced sequences and 143 sequences downloaded from GenBank. This work followed the phylogenetic study reported by Kumkar et al. (2016a) and selected Beaufortia liui Chang 1944, Beaufortia szechuanensis (Fang, 1930), Formosania chenyiyui (Zheng, 1991), Vanmanenia caldwelli (Zheng, 1991), and Myxocyprinus asiaticus (Bleeker, 1864) as outgroups.

All sequences were assembled and aligned using the MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) module in MEGA v. 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016b) with default settings. The alignment results were checked by eye. The sequences after alignment and check were combined using PhyloSuite v. 1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2020). Phylogenetic trees were constructed with both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. The ML method was conducted in IQ-TREE v. 2.0.4 (Nguyen et al. 2015) with 10000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFB) replicates (Hoang et al. 2018) and was performed until a correlation coefficient of at least 0.99 was reached. The BI method was performed in MrBayes v. 3.2.1 (Ronquist et al. 2012), and the best-fit model was obtained based on the Bayesian information criterion computed with PartitionFinder v. 2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2017). In this analysis, the first, second, and third codons of Cyt b, COI, RAG1, IRBP, and EGR2B were defined.

The analysis suggested the best partition scheme for each codon position of Cyt b, COI, RAG1, IRBP, and EGR2B. As a result, SYM+G was selected as the best model for the first codon of Cyt b; HKY+I was selected as the best model for the second codon of Cyt b, COI, EGR2B, IRBP, and RAG1, and the first codon of EGR2B; TRN+I+G was selected as the best model for the third codon of Cyt b; TRNEF+G and TIM+G were selected as the best models for the first and third codons of COI; TVM was selected as the best model for the third codon of EGR2B; TVM+I was selected as the best model for the first codon of IRBP and RAG1; and K80+G was selected as the best model for the third codon of IRBP and RAG1. Two independent runs were conducted in BI analysis, each of which was performed for 2 × 107 generations and sampled every 1,000 generations. The first 25% of the samples were discarded as burn-in, resulting in a potential scale reduction factor of < 0.01. Nodes in the trees were considered well supported when the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) were ≥ 0.95 and the ML UFB value was ≥95%. Uncorrected p-distances (1000 replicates) based on Cyt b and COI were estimated using MEGA 7.0.

Morphological data and comparisons

Morphometric data were collected from 11 well-preserved specimens of the new species (Table 3). A total of 37 measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm with digital calipers following the protocol of Kottelat (1984) and Liu et al. (2012a). All measurements are taken on the left side of the fish specimens. Measurements for the new species in this study are provided in Table 3. All pre-processing of morphological data was performed in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation 2016) and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparative data for the 18 species of the genus Balitora were obtained from the literature (Table 4). Vertebrae were counted from x-ray scanned images and skeletal counts refer to the previous Kumkar et al. (2016a) and Min et al. (2022).

Table 3.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Morphological characters and measurement data (mm) of the new species Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. described in this study.

Characters GZNU2023 0215007 GZNU2023 0215008 GZNU2023 0215009 GZNU2023 0215010 GZNU2023 0215011 GZNU2023 0215012 GZNU2023 02150113 GZNU2023 0215014 GZNU2023 0215015 GZNU2023 0215016 GZNU2023 0215017 Range Mean ± SD
Dorsal-fin rays iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ iii, 8½ / /
Pectoral-fin rays viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 viii, 11 / /
Pelvic-fin rays ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 ii, 9 / /
Anal-fin rays iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ iii, 5½ / /
Caudal-fin rays 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 / /
Lateral-line pores/scales 68 68 68 68 67 68 68 67 66 68 68 66–68 /
Total length 60.4 57.7 51.7 56.9 52.2 59.6 56.7 53.6 49.7 60.4 55.8 49.7–60.4 55.9 ± 3.7
Standard length 47.9 44.6 42.4 44.7 42.3 47.7 45.9 42.5 39.8 48.2 44.3 39.8–48.2 44.6 ± 2.7
Body depth 5.2 5.3 5.6 5.5 4.7 5.8 5.6 5.0 4.5 5.8 5.1 4.5–5.8 5.3 ± 0.4
Body width 6.5 5.4 5.8 5.2 5.3 6.0 5.9 5.4 5.1 6.4 5.3 5.1–6.5 5.7 ± 0.5
Head length 10.3 10.0 9.3 10.6 9.4 10.5 10.4 9.9 8.4 9.9 9.9 8.4–10.6 9.9 ± 0.6
Head depth 4.9 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.6 4.5 4.1 3.6–4.9 4.2 ± 0.3
Head width 8.7 6.8 7.0 6.7 6.6 7.2 7.2 6.1 6.3 7.0 6.9 6.1–8.7 7.0 ± 0.7
Pre-anterior distance 3.5 4.3 3.4 3.8 3.7 4.6 3.6 3.9 3.8 3.9 4.4 3.4–4.6 3.9 ± 0.4
Distance between anterior nostrils 2.8 2.9 2.8 3.1 2.6 3.0 2.9 2.3 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.1–3.1 2.6 ± 0.4
Distance between posterior nostrils 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.6 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.1 2.9–3.8 3.5 ± 0.3
Distance between anterior and posterior nostrils 2.0 1.7 1.1 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.1–2.0 1.5 ± 0.2
Snout length 5.9 5.3 5.2 5.6 5.2 6.1 5.4 5.1 4.9 5.6 5.6 4.9–6.1 5.4 ± 0.4
Upper jaw length 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.1 2.7 2.3 2.8 2.6 2.1–2.8 2.6 ± 0.2
Lower jaw length 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.9 1.4 1.9 1.4 2.1 2.0 1.4–2.1 1.8 ± 0.2
Mouth width 3.6 3.8 3.5 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.0 3.6 3.4 4.0 3.7 3.4–4.2 3.8 ± 0.3
Eye diameter 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.8–1.3 1.0 ± 0.1
Interorbital distance 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.7 3.5 3.7 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.5–4.7 4.2 ± 0.4
Predorsal length 22.3 21.2 19.2 20.9 19.5 21.9 21.0 20.1 18.2 22.0 20.5 18.2–22.3 20.6 ± 1.3
Dorsal-fin base length 7.4 6.0 6.2 6.3 5.3 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.1 7.7 6.4 5.3–7.7 6.5 ± 0.7
Dorsal-fin length 10.9 10.5 9.6 10.3 10.2 10.4 10.1 10.0 8.9 11.0 10.1 8.9–11.0 10.2 ± 0.6
Pectoral-fin length 11.7 10.4 10.0 10.9 9.8 11.1 11.6 9.9 10.2 11.8 11.2 9.8–11.8 10.8 ± 0.8
Pectoral-fin base length 4.9 4.0 3.8 3.4 3.8 4.2 4.1 3.3 4.0 4.7 4.3 3.3–4.9 4.0 ± 0.5
Pre-pectoral length 9.3 8.7 7.3 8.2 7.2 8.4 7.8 8.2 7.4 8.1 7.8 7.2–9.3 8.0 ± 0.6
Pelvic-fin length 10.0 10.1 8.5 9.4 8.8 10.4 9.8 9.2 8.5 10.3 9.2 8.5–10.4 9.5 ± 0.7
Pelvic-fin base length 3.4 2.6 3.2 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.6–3.4 2.8 ± 0.3
Pre-pelvic length 22.6 21.7 19.7 20.1 20.2 22.7 21.5 20.3 18.8 21.8 20.1 18.8–22.7 20.9 ± 1.3
Anal-fin length 8.7 8.5 7.3 8.4 7.6 8.5 8.0 7.9 6.9 8.6 7.8 6.9–8.7 8.0 ± 0.6
Anal-fin base length 3.9 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.3 4.0 3.8 3.3 3.6 3.4 3.3–4.0 3.6 ± 0.3
Pre-anal length 34.8 33.0 30.4 32.5 31.6 35.3 33.5 31.2 29.8 35.2 31.9 29.8–35.3 32.7 ± 1.9
Distance between origin of pectoral fin and origin of ventral fin 10.0 9.4 9.0 9.8 9.3 10.8 10.2 9.1 8.2 10.7 9.7 8.2–10.8 9.7 ± 0.8
Distance between origin of ventral fin and origin of Anal fin 10.6 8.9 8.8 9.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.3 8.4 10.3 9.5 8.3–10.6 9.5 ± 0.8
Distance between end of Anal fin and anus 1.8 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.9 3.0 2.3 1.9 1.7 2.4 2.1 1.7–3.0 2.3 ± 0.4
Caudal peduncle length 8.6 9.6 8.5 8.7 7.5 9.6 9.1 8.1 7.8 9.9 9.2 7.5–9.9 8.8 ± 0.8
Caudal peduncle depth 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.8 3.0 2.3 3.2 3.0 2.3–3.2 2.9 ± 0.3
Inner maxillary barbel length 1.4 2.0 1.4 2.1 1.7 2.5 1.5 2.4 1.7 2.0 1.5 1.4–2.5 1.8 ± 0.4
Outer maxillary barbel length 1.1 1.0 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.5 1.0 1.2 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.9–1.5 1.1 ± 0.2
Inner rostral barbel length 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.6 1.1 1.0–1.6 1.3 ± 0.2
Outer rostral barbel length 1.9 2.0 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.2 1.7 1.7–2.2 1.9 ± 0.1
Table 4.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Comparison of the diagnostic characters of the new species described here with those selected for the 16 species of the genus Balitora. Gray shading indicates clear differences in characters compared to Balitora anlongensis sp. nov.

ID Species Maxillary barbels Dorsal fin rays Anal fin rays Pectoral fin rays Pelvic fin rays Lateral-line scales Dorsal black spot Pectoral fin tip Position of origin of dorsal-fin and origin of pelvic-fin Tip of pelvic fin reaching anus
1 Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. 2 iii, 8½ iii, 5½ viii, 11 iii, 9 66–68 6–7 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Anterior to the pelvic-fin origin Yes
2 B. annamitica 1 – – viii–x, ? – 61–62 – – – –
3 B. brucei 1 iii, 8 i, 5 ix, 11 ii, 9 65–69 – – – –
4 B. burmanica 1 iii, 8 i, 5 ix, 11 ii, 8 70–72 – – – –
5 B. chipkali 1 iii, 8 iii, 5 iii–ix, 11–12 ii, 9 66–68 7 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Opposite to pelvic-fin origin Yes
6 B. eddsi 1 iii, 9 iii, 5\7 vi, 10–12 ii, 8–9 66–67 Without Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Slightly anterior to pelvic-fin origin NO
7 B. jalpalli 1 iii, 8 ii, 5 ix, 10–11 ii, 8–9 64–66 9 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Opposite to pelvic-fin origin NO
8 B. kwangsiensis 2 iii, 8 ii, 5 vi–viii, 10–13 ii, 8 61–65 6–8 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Anterior to the pelvic-fin origin Yes
9 B. lancangjiangensis 1 iii, 8 ii, 5 viii, 10–12 ii, 8–9 68–70 7–8 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Opposite to pelvic-fin origin NO
10 B. laticauda 1 iii, 8 iii, 5 viii–ix, 10–11 ii, 8–9 66–68 10 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Opposite to pelvic fin origin NO
11 B. longibarbata 2 iii, 8 ii, 5 viii–x, 11–14 ii, 9–11 74–76 8–9 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Opposite to pelvic-fin origin NO
12 B. ludongensis 2 iii, 8 ii, 5 vi–vii, 11–12 ii, 6–7 69–74 6–9 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Slightly anterior to pelvic-fin origin Yes
13 B. meridionalis 1 – – – – – – – – –
14 B. mysorensis 1 iii, 8–9 ii, 5 viii-ix 10–12 ii, 8–9 68–69 – – – –
15 B. nantingensis 1 iii, 8 ii, 5 viii–x, 9–12 ii, 9 59–64 – Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Slightly anterior to pelvic-fin origin –
16 B. elongata 1 iii, 8 ii, 5 x, 10–12 iii, 8 67 7 Not reaching to pelvic fin origin Opposite to pelvic-fin origin NO
17 B. tchangi 1 iii, 7 ii, 5 xii, 13 v, 13 74 8 Beyond the origin of pelvic fin Posterior to the pelvic-fin origin NO

Results

Phylogenetic analyses and genetic divergence

Both ML and BI phylogenies were constructed based on two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes, with a sequence length of 5382 base pairs. The BI and ML phylogenetic trees show a highly consistent topology that strongly supports the monophyly of the family Balitoridae and can be divided into five major clades (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. 

A Distributions of the different clades of the genus Balitora in Asia B phylogenetic tree reconstructed based on combined two mitochondrial (Cyt b and COI) and three nuclear gene (RAG1, IRBP, and EGR2B) fragments. In this phylogenetic tree, ultrafast bootstrap (UFB) supports from maximum likelihood (ML) analyses/Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) from Bayesian inference (BI) analyses are noted beside nodes. The scale bar represents 0.04 nucleotide substitutions per site. The numbers at the tips of branches correspond to the ID numbers in Table 2.

The phylogenetic tree shows that Balitora is not a monophyletic and contains three distant clades: Clade I, including B. meridionalis Kottelat, 1988, B. elongata, B. laticauda Bhoite, Jadhav & Dahanukar, 2012, B. jalpalli Raghavan, Tharian, Ali, Jadhav & Dahanukar, 2013, B. chipkali Kumar, Katwate, Raghavan & Dahanukar, 2016, B. mysorensis Hora, 1941, B. annamitica Kottelat, 1988, and B. brucei Gray, 1830 (type species of the genus Balitora); Clade II, containing only B. kwangsiensis; and Clade III, including B. ludongensis and the new species described in this study (Fig. 3). In addition, this study also found the non-monophyly of Hemimyzon, Sinogastromyzon, and Lepturichthys Regan, 1911 (Fig. 3). The smallest uncorrected p-distances between Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. and other species of the genus Balitora were 7.3% in Cyt b (with B. ludongensis) and 9.2% in COI (with B. mysorensis) (Tables 5, 6). This is greater than the mitochondrial genetic differences with other known species, for example, 4.5% in Cyt b between B. chipkali and B. laticauda and 2.1% in COI between B. jalpalli and B. laticauda (Tables 5, 6).

Table 5.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Uncorrected p-distance (%) between eight species of the genus Balitora based on mitochondrial Cyt b.

ID Species 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Balitora anlongensis sp. nov.
2 Balitora ludongensis 7.3
3 Balitora brucei 10.4 9.5
4 Balitora chipkali 12.0 11.9 9.9
5 Balitora elongata 9.2 9.5 10.7 11.1
6 Balitora kwangsiensis 9.5 9.0 9.6 12.8 10.5
7 Balitora laticauda 10.9 10.6 8.3 4.5 10.3 11.4
8 Balitora mysorensis 10.6 10.3 9.0 11.7 10.3 11.3 10.4
Table 6.
Download as
CSV
XLSX

Uncorrected p-distance (%) between nine species of the genus Balitora based on mitochondrial COI.

ID Species 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 Balitora anlongensis sp. nov.
2 Balitora ludongensis 10.5
3 Balitora brucei 10.2 11.1
4 Balitora chipkali 10.5 11.1 9.4
5 Balitora jalpalli 10.3 11.3 9.7 1.1
6 Balitora kwangsiensis 12.1 11.7 12.2 12.3 12.8
7 Balitora laticauda 11.1 11.7 9.3 2.5 2.1 12.5
8 Balitora mysorensis 9.2 10.0 6.8 9.0 8.6 11.5 8.4
9 Balitora nujiangensis 9.6 10.0 9.4 9.6 9.8 10.0 9.8 8.4

Thus, the population at this locality represents an independently evolved lineage and is described as a new species, Balitora anlongensis sp. nov., below.

Taxonomic account

Balitora anlongensis Luo, Chen, Zhao, Yu, Lan & Zhou, sp. nov.

https://zoobank.org/C1E6B69D-57B1-4AC3-ACCC-3A92F6E2E653
Figs 4, 5, 6, Table 3

Type material

Holotype. GZNU20230215007 (Fig. 4), 60.4 mm total length (TL), 47.9 mm standard length (SL), collected by Tao Luo on 15 February 2023 in Xīniú Cave (犀牛洞), NaNao Village, Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guizhou Province, China (105.59143424E, 25.07096446N, 1450 m. a.s.l.; Figs 1, 2).

Figure 4. 

Morphological characters of holotype GZNU20230215007 of Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. in preservative (10% formalin) A lateral view B dorsal view C ventral view D ventral side view of head, and E dorsal side view of head. Photos from Tao Luo. Abbreviations: M, maxillary barbels; AN, anterior nostril.

Paratypes. Ten specimens from the same locality as the holotype: GZNU20230215008–215017, collected by Tao Luo, Xin-Rui Zhao, Wei-Feng Wang, Jing Yu, and Chang-Ting Lan on 15 February 2023.

Comments

The new species is assigned to the genus Balitora based on the combination of the following diagnostic characters (Kottelat 1988; Kottelat and Chu 1988): (1) body strongly depressed; head and abdomen ventrally flattened; (2) mouth inferior, arched, with both jaws covered by a horny sheath; (3) rostral flap divided into three lobes, both lips with one or two rows of papillae, lower lip not interrupted; (4) one or two pairs of maxillary barbels; (5) gill-openings extending on the ventral surface of head; (6) unbranched pelvic rays two, 8–10 unbranched pectoral rays and 10–12 branched pectoral rays; and (7) adhesive pads present on ventral surface of the 8–11 anterior most pectoral rays and 3–4 anterior most pelvic rays.

Diagnosis

Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from other congeners by the following combination of characters: (1) two pairs of maxillary barbels; (2) dorsal fin rays iii, 8½; (3) pectoral fin viii, 11; (4) pelvic fin rays ii, 9; (5) anal fin rays iii, 5½; (6) lateral-line scales 66–68; (7) tip of pectoral fin not reaching to the pelvic fin origin; (8) dorsal fin origin anterior to the pelvic fin origin; (9) tip of the pelvic fin reaching to the anus; (10) eyes small, eye diameter equal to outer maxillary barbel length; (11) six to seven indistinctly separated transversely oval blotches on the dorsal side; and (12) each fin transparent and unpigmented in life.

Description

Morphological data of the 11 specimens of the Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. are provided in Table 3. Body elongated and sub-cylindrical, posterior portion gradually compressed from dorsal fin to caudal-fin base, with deepest body depth anterior to dorsal-fin origin, deepest body depth 11–13% of SL. Dorsal profile slightly convex from snout to dorsal-fin insertion, then straight from posterior portion of dorsal-fin origin to caudal-fin base. Pelvic profile flat. Head blunt and depressed, head length (HL) 21–24% of SL and greater than head width, head width greater than depth (head width/head depth = 1.7). Snout short, oblique, and blunt, length 52–58% HL. Interorbital space wide and flat. Mouth inferior, small and curved, mouth corner situated below anterior nostril, upper and lower lips smooth and fleshy. Relatively shallow preoral groove present between rostral cap and upper lip, extending across corners of mouth. Mouth width 35–44% of head width. Rostral cap around upper lip divided into three lobes, median one largest, slightly curved. Four pairs of barbels: two pairs of rostral barbels, short, outer rostral barbel longer than inner one; two pairs of maxillary barbels, short, situated at corner of mouth: outer maxillary barbels longer than inner one. Upper and lower lips connected at corner of mouth, upper lip with 3–5 papillae in middle, and lower lip thin, with large fleshy papilla at upper and lower lip joint. Lower jaw with radiate ridges on its surface. Two longitudinal fleshy ridges on mid-chin. Anterior and posterior nostrils closely set, anterior nostril without any elongated barbel-like tip. Eyes reduced, 8–13% HL. Gill opening large, extending to origin of pectoral fin, gill rakers absent.

Dorsal fin rays iii, 8½, pectoral fin rays viii,11, pelvic fin rays ii, 9, anal fin rays iii, 5½, and 17 branched caudal fin rays. Dorsal fin long, 22–24% of SL, nearly equal to head length, distal margin truncated, origin anterior to pelvic fin insertion, situated slightly anterior to midpoint between snout tip and the caudal fin base, first branched ray longest, shorter than HL, tip of the dorsal fin extending to the vertical of the anus. Pectoral fin elongated and developed, distal margin rounded, pectoral fin length slightly greater than HL, 23–25% of SL, tip of the pectoral fin extends backward beyond 3/4 of the distance between the origin of the pectoral fin and the origin of the pelvic fin, without reaching to the pelvic fin-origin. Pelvic fin moderately developed, distal margin rounded, pectoral fin length approximately equal to HL, 23–26% of SL, vertically aligned with the third branched ray of the dorsal fin, pelvic fin origin closer to the snout tip than the caudal fin base and closer to the anal fin origin than the snout tip, tips of the pelvic fin reaching to the anus. Anus ~ 4/5 distance from posterior end of the pelvic fin base to the anal fin origin. Anal fin short, 17–19% of SL, distal margin truncated, origin close to the anus and far from the caudal fin base, spacing ~ 2.9 mm, tips of the anal fin extending backwards and not reaching caudal fin base, distance between the end of the anal fin and the anus 5.4-times the eye diameter. Caudal fin deeply forked, upper lobe equal in length to the lower one, tips pointed, caudal peduncle length 8.8 mm, caudal peduncle depth 2.9 mm, without adipose crests along both dorsal and ventral sides. Vertebrae 36: nine pre-dorsal abdominal, 19 abdominal (including four Weberian and 15 pre-dorsal ones), and 17 caudal (including three pre-anal caudal and the hypural complex) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. 

Three-dimensionally reconstructed model of the skeleton of Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. (paratype GZNU20230223017, standard length 44.3 mm) A dorsal view B ventral view, and C lateral view.

Body smooth, covered with thin scales all over except for on the ventral side, head, and fins. Lateral line complete and straight, with 66–68 lateral line scales, exceeding the tip of the pectoral fin and reaching the base of the caudal fin. Two air bladder chambers, posterior chamber of the air bladder slightly developed and closed (Fig. 5).

Coloration

Dwelling in the water bodies of the cave (Fig. 6), dorsal and lateral sides of the body grey-brown, ventral side white, slightly pinkish. Dorsal side of the head grayish-white, grayish-brown pigmented spots predominate. Dorsal side of the body with six to seven indistinctly transversely oval blotches separated by grayish-yellow gaps, and usually two blotches anterior to the dorsal fin origin, one to two blotches at the dorsal fin base, and three to four blotches posterior to the dorsal fin end. Except for discontinuous black spots on the distal end of the caudal fin, the remaining fins are transparent and unpigmented. Base of the caudal fin deeply pigmented. Lateral line of the body from the posterior to the eye to the base of the caudal fin light grayish yellow. After being moved from inside the cave to outside, the body pigmentation deepened in ~ 4 hrs. After being fixed in 10% formalin and stored (Fig. 4), the body pigmentation deepened and there was pigmentation on the unbranched fins of each fin.

Figure 6. 

Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. in life, paratypes GZNU20230106001 (photos A and B) and GZNU20230215014 (photo C) A right-side view B ventral side view, and C dorsal view. Photographs A, B were shot indoors at ~ 9:00 p.m. Photo C was taken in the cave at ~ 15:00 noon.

Sexual dimorphism

No sexual dimorphism was observed based on the present specimens of Balitora anlongensis sp. nov.

Comparisons

Comparative data of Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. with 19 species within the genus Balitora are given in Table 4.

Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. differs from B. annamitica, B. brucei, B. burmanica Hora, 1932, B. chipkali, B. eddsi Conway & Mayden, 2010, B. jalpalli, B. lancangjiangensis, B. laticauda, B. meridionalis, B. mysorensis, B. nantingensis Chen, Cui & Yang, 2005, B. elongata, and B. tchangi based on the presence of two maxillary barbels at each corner of the mouth (vs one maxillary barbel at each corner of the mouth). Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. can be further distinguished from B. eddsi and B. tchangi based on dorsal fin rays (iii, 8½ vs iii, 9 in B. eddsi and iii, 7 in B. tchangi); from B. jalpalli, B. lancangjiangensis, B. laticauda, B. nantingensis, B. elongata, and B. tchangi by the tip of pelvic fin reaching to the anus (vs not reaching to the anus); from B. brucei by pectoral fin rays (viii, 11 vs ix, 11); and from B. jalpalli, B. lancangjiangensis, B. laticauda, B. elongata, and B. tchangi by the dorsal fin origin being anterior to the pelvic fin origin (vs opposite/posterior to pelvic fin origin; see Table 4 for detailed comparisons).

Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. and B. kwangsiensis, B. longibarbata, and B. ludongensis are distributed in the Pearl River and share two maxillary barbels at each corner of the mouth, but can be distinguished by the combination of serial characters. Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from B. kwangsiensis by anal fin rays (iii, 5½ vs ii, 5), pelvic fin rays (ii, 9 vs ii, 8), lateral-line scales (66–68 vs 61–65), and each fin being transparent and unpigmented in life (vs each fin having black spots); from B. longibarbata by the pelvic fin rays (ii, 8 vs ii, 9–11), anal fin rays (iii, 5½ vs ii, 5), lateral-line scales (66–68 vs 74–76), the dorsal fin origin being anterior to the pelvic fin origin (vs opposite to the pelvic fin origin), and the tip of the pelvic fin reaching to the anus (vs not reaching to the anus).

Phylogeny constructed based on combined mitochondrial and nuclear genes shows that Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. is close to B. ludongensis and can be distinguished by the combination of the following morphological characters: eight unbranched pectoral fin rays (vs six to seven), anal fin rays (iii, 5½ vs ii, 5), pelvic fin rays (ii, 9 vs ii, 6–7), lateral-line scales (66–68 vs 69–74), dorsal fin origin far anterior to the pelvic fin origin (vs slightly anterior to the pelvic fin origin), body depth 13–14% of the SL (vs 15–20%), body width 12–14% of SL (vs 18–21%), head depth 38–48% of HL (vs 51–67%), head width 109–134% of body width (vs 87–107%), transversely oval blotches on dorsal side indistinctly separated (vs distinctly separated), and each fin transparent and unpigmented in life (vs each fin having black spots).

Distribution and ecology

Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. is only known from the type locality, a vertical cave some distance from NaNao Village, Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guizhou Province, China at an elevation of 1387 m (Figs 1, 2). The type locality is located in the Nanpanjiang River, a tributary of the Pearl River. There is no surface stream outside the cave. The cave is ~ 50 m long and has a small volume of water during dry periods, but is a source of domestic water for the local population. Within this cave, Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. co-occurred with fish (Triplophysa sp. and Misgurnus anguillicaudatus), frog (Odorrana sp.), red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta), and crab (Diyutamon cereum) species. Outside the cave, the arable land was farmed to produce maize, wheat, and potatoes.

Etymology

The specific epithet “anlongensis” is in reference to the type locality of the new species: NaNao Village, Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guizhou Province, China. We propose the common English name “Anlong stone loach” and the Chinese name “ān lóng Pá Qīu (安龙爬鳅)”.

Discussion

This work described a new cavefish species from Xinglong Town, Anlong County, Guizhou, named Balitora anlongensis sp. nov., based on morphological comparisons (see the comparison above) and genetic differences (Fig. 3; Tables 3, 4), i.e., forming a separate lineage and with an uncorrected p-distance of 7.3% (in Cyt b) from B. ludongensis. This evidence supports the validity of the new species and indicates that this species is the first cave fish within the genus Balitora in China. The description of this new species increases the number of species of the genus Balitora from 19 to 20 (Table 1), with the number known from Guizhou increasing to two species (Zheng 1989), i.e., B. kwangsiensis and Balitora anlongensis sp. nov. Notably, known species of the genus Balitora are mainly distributed in southern India, Nepal, Thailand, Vietnam, and in Yunnan, Northwestern Guangxi, and Southeastern Guizhou in China (Fricke et al. 2023) (Fig. 1). The discovery of this new species for the first time in southwestern Guizhou and the discontinuous distribution of Balitora in the Nanpanjiang and Hongshui River basins (Fig. 2) suggest that there may be undescribed species within these regions. In other words, the species diversity of Balitora in Southwestern China may be underestimated and needs to be fully and systematically surveyed.

The genus Balitora may need to be revised in the future by combining evidence from phylogenetic and morphological evidence. The taxonomy of the genus Balitora based on morphological characters has undergone two major revisions, with the main controversy being over its key diagnostic characteristics, i.e., one pair of maxillary barbel (Chen 1978; Chen and Tang 2000) or two unbranched pelvic fin rays (Kottelat and Chu 1988). In the phylogenetic tree reconstructed in this study based on two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes, Balitora was divided into four distant clades, supporting the non-monophyletic results of Balitora considered in previous studies (Kumkar et al. 2016a). In addition, within the genus Balitora, the number of maxillary barbels (one or two) does not have strict phylogenetic correspondence and therefore may need to be revised and supplemented for key diagnoses (Fig. 3A). Clade I contains the type species B. brucei, and therefore Clade I is the true Balitora, i.e., Balitora sensu stricto, which is mainly distributed in India, Nepal, Thailand, and Vietnam (green area in Fig. 3B). Clade II contains the type species of Sinohomaloptera, S. kwangsiensis, thus supporting the validity of Sinohomaloptera, and is mainly distributed in northern Guangxi, southeastern Guizhou, and eastern Yunnan, China (blue area in Fig. 3A). The remaining clade III may represent a new taxonomic group, with Clade III mainly distributed in the Zuojiang River basin in western Guangxi and the Nanpanjiang River basin in southwestern Guizhou (red area in Fig. 3B). The discovery of this new species in the Nanpanjiang River basin of Guizhou extended the current distribution of Balitora to the northeast. However, this work failed to complete the revision of Clade III of Balitora because morphological evidence of sufficient specimens was not obtained. Thus, to complete this revision, in the future, sufficient specimens, skeletal CT, and chromosomal, anatomical, and genomic-level phylogenetic relationships can be obtained to address this revision.

Comparative material examined

Balitora ludongensis (n = 2): China: Guangxi: Jingxi County: Ludong Town (type locality): GZNU 20230207001–0207002.

Balitora kwangsiensis (n = 2): China: Yunnan: Amojiang River basin: GZNU20230226001–0226002.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wei-Feng Wang, Xing-Liang Wang, Li Wu, Cui Fan, and other for help with specimen collection. We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research was supported by the programs of the Diversity and Distribution Survey of Chiroptera species in China (2021FY100302), the Guizhou Province Top Discipline Construction Program Project (Qianjiao Keyan Fa [2019] 125), and the Guizhou Normal University Academic Emerging Talent Fund Project (Qianshi Xin Miao [2021] 20).

Author contributions

Jiang Zhou and Tao Luo conceived and designed the research; Tao Luo, Zhi-Xia Chen, Xin-Rui Zhao, Jing Yu, and Chang-Ting Lan conducted field surveys and collected samples; Tao Luo, Jing Yu, Ning Xiao and Chang-Ting Lan performed molecular work; Zhi-Xia Chen, Jia-Jun Zhou, and Xin-Rui Zhao collected distribution data and mapped the distribution; and Jiang Zhou, Ning Xiao and Tao Luo wrote and discussed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Tao Luo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-1192

Zhi-Xia Chen https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2066-494X

Xin-Rui Zhao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9125-6276

Jing Yu https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3629-3826

Chang-Ting Lan https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2381-3601

Jia-Jun Zhou https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-1540

Ning Xiao https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7240-6726

Jiang Zhou https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1560-8759

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Bhoite S, Jadhav S, Dahanukar N (2012) Balitora laticauda, a new species of stone loach (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Balitoridae) from Krishna River, northern Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 4(11): 3038–3049. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3129.3038-49
  • Chen YY (1978) Systematic studies on the fishes of the family Homalopteridae of China i. classification of the fishes of the subfamily Homalopterinae. Shui Sheng Sheng Wu Hsueh Bao 6(3): 331–348. [In Chinese]
  • Chen YR (1990) Homalopteridae. In: Chu et al. (Eds) The fishes of Yunnan, China Part II. Science, Beijing, 313 pp. [In Chinese]
  • Chen YY, Tang WQ (2000) Homalopteridae. In: Yue et al. (Eds) Fauna Sinica. Osteichthyes. Cypriniformes III. Science, Beijing, 661 pp. [In Chinese]
  • Chen XY, Cui GH, Yang JX (2005) Balitora nantingensis (Teleostei: Balitoridae), a new hill stream loach from Salween drainage in Yunnan, southwestern China. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 13(Supplement): 21–26.
  • Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
  • Fang PW (1930) New homalopterin loaches from Kwangsi, China. Sinensia 1: 25–42.
  • Gray JE (1830) Illustrations of Indian Zoology: Chiefly Selected from the Collection of Major-General Hardwicke (Vol. 1). Treuttel, Wurtz, Treuttel, Jun. and Richter, London, 200 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.95127
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx281
  • Jiang ZG, Jiang JP, Wang YZ, Zhang E, Zhang YY, Li LL, Xie F, Cai B, Cao L, Zheng GM, Dong L, Zhang ZW, Ding P, Luo ZH, Ding CQ, Ma ZJ, Tang SH, Cao WX, Li CW, Hu HJ, Ma Y, Wu Y, Wang YX, Zhou KY, Liu SY, Chen YY, Li JT, Feng ZJ, Wang Y, Wang B, Li C, Song XL, Cai L, Zang CX, Zeng Y, Meng ZB, Fang HX, Ping XG (2016) Red List of China’s Vertebrates. Shengwu Duoyangxing 24(5): 500–551. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2016076 [In Chinese]
  • Keskar A, Raghavan R, Paingankar MS, Kumkar P, Katwate U, Jadhav S, Padhye A, Dahanukar N (2018) Molecular phylogeny unveils hidden diversity of hill stream loaches (Cypriniformes: Cobitoidea) in the northern Western Ghats of India. Meta Gene 17: 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2018.07.002
  • Kottelat M (1984) Revision of the Indonesian and Malaysian loaches of the Subfamily Neomacheilinae. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 31(3): 225–242.
  • Kottelat M (1988) Indian and Indochinese species of Balitora (Osteichthyes: Cypriniformes) with descriptions of two new species and comments on the family-group names Balitoridae and Homalopteridae. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 95(2): 487–504. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.79667
  • Kottelat M (2012) Conspectus cobitidum: an inventory of the loaches of the world (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cobitoidei). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 26: 1–199.
  • Kottelat M (2013) The fishes of the inland waters of Southeast Asia: A catalogue and core bibliography of the fishes known to occur in freshwaters, mangroves and estuaries. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 27: 1–663.
  • Kottelat M, Chu XL (1988) A synopsis of Chinese balitorine loaches (Osteichthyes: Homalopteridae) with comments on their phylogeny and description of a new genus. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 95(1): 181–201. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.79647
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016b) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Kumkar P, Katwate U, Raghavan R, Dahanukar N (2016a) Balitora chipkali, a new species of stone loach (Teleostei: Balitoridae) from the northern Western Ghats of India, with a note on the distribution of B. laticauda. Zootaxa 4138(1): 155–170. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4138.1.7
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2017) PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Li ZY, Chen YR (1985) On two new species of Homalopteridae fishes from Yunnan. Zoological Research 6(2): 169–173. [In Chinese]
  • Liu SQ, Mayden RL, Zhang JB, Yu D, Tang QY, Deng X, Liu HZ (2012a) Phylogenetic relationships of the Cobitoidea (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear genes with analyses of gene evolution. Gene 508(1): 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.040
  • Liu SW, Zhu Y, Wei RF, Chen XY (2012b) A new species of the genus Balitora (Teleostei: Balitoridae) from Guangxi, China. Environmental Biology of Fishes 93(3): 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9924-x
  • Min R, Zhao Y, Shi J, Yang J (2022) A new species of Homatula (Teleostei, Cobitoidea, Nemacheilidae) from the Pearl River drainage, Yunnan, China. ZooKeys 1089: 109–124. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1089.77203
  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772): 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  • Nguyen VH (2005) Ca Nuoc Ngot Viet Nam. Tap II [Freshwater fishes of Vietnam (Vol. II)]. Nha Xuat Ban Nong Nghiep, Hanoi, 760 pp.
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von HA, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Raghavan R, Tharian J, Ali A, Jadhav S, Dahanukar N (2013) Balitora jalpalli, a new species of stone loach (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Balitoridae) from Silent Valley, southern Western Ghats, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(5): 3921–3934. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3277.3921-34
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van DMP, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Shao L, Lin Y, Kuang T, Zhou L (2020) Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Balitora ludongensis (Teleost: Balitoridae) and its phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources 5(3): 2308–2309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1773342
  • Šlechtová V, Bohlen J, Tan HH (2007) Families of Cobitoidea (Teleostei; Cypriniformes) as revealed from nuclear genetic data and the position of the mysterious genera Barbucca, Psilorhynchus, Serpenticobitis and Vaillantella. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44(3): 1358–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.02.019
  • Tao W, Yang L, Mayden RL, He S (2019) Phylogenetic relationships of Cypriniformes and plasticity of pharyngeal teeth in the adaptive radiation of cyprinids. Science China. Life Sciences 62(4): 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-019-9480-3
  • Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096
  • Zheng JZ (1989) Homalopteridae. In: Wu L et al. (Eds) The Fishes of Guizhou. Guizhou People’s Publishing House, Guiyang, 338 pp. [In Chinese]
  • Zheng CY, Zhang W (1983) On the genus Balitora Gray from Yunnan Province. China. Journal of Science and Medicine of Jinan University 1: 65–70. [In Chinese]
  • Zheng CY, Chen YR, Huang SY (1982) The Homalopterid Fishes from Yunnan Province, China. Zoological Research 3(4): 393–402. [In Chinese]

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

List of cavefishes in China

Tao Luo, Zhi-Xia Chen, Xin-Rui Zhao, Jing Yu, Chang-Ting Lan, Jia-Jun Zhou, Ning Xiao, Jiang Zhou

Data type: xlsx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (31.72 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Specific primers used to amplify two mitochondrial and three nuclear genes

Tao Luo, Zhi-Xia Chen, Xin-Rui Zhao, Jing Yu, Chang-Ting Lan, Jia-Jun Zhou, Ning Xiao, Jiang Zhou

Data type: xlsx

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (10.21 kb)
login to comment