Utility of cytochrome c oxidase I for the deciphering of unstable phylogeny and taxonomy of gorals, genus Nemorhaedus Hamilton Smith, 1827 (Bovidae, Ovibovina)

Petr Hrabina; Ludmila Pernerová; Josef Suchomel; Jan Robovský

doi:10.3897/zookeys.1181.108019

Abstract

Gorals represent ungulate mammals of the Palearctic and Indo-Malayan realms that face habitat destruction and intense hunting pressure. Their classification has been the subject of various (mainly genetic) assessments in the last decade, but some results are conflicting, hampering some conservation-based decisions. Genetic sampling of gorals has increased considerably in recent years, at least for mitochondrial (mt) DNA. Results based on two mt genes (cytochrome b and the D-loop) are currently available. Still, the utility of cytochrome oxidase subunit I remains unanalysed, even though it belongs among the gene markers that enable a correct species identification in mammals. This study examines phylogenetic relationships and species delimitation in gorals using all currently available cytochrome oxidase subunit I sequences, including the not yet analysed goral population from Pakistan. Our results of various phylogenetic approaches, such as maximum parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian inference, and exploration of species boundaries via species delimitation support the validity of six species of goral, namely N. baileyi, N. caudatus, N. cranbrooki, N. evansi, N. goral, and N. griseus. This result accords well with results based on other mt genes, especially the cytochrome b from the highly exhaustive data sampling. Our study also summarises common sources of errors in the assessment of goral phylogeny and taxonomy and highlights future priorities in understanding goral diversification.

Key words

COI, mitochondrion, Naemorhedus, voucher specimen

Introduction

Gorals are elusive herbivore mammals that occupy the mixed feeder niche in the Palearctic and Indo-Malayan realms (Isarankura Na Ayudhya et al. 2022). The genus occupies a vast distribution range across Asia, spanning several biogeographical zones and biomes (Damm and Franco 2014; Dinerstein et al. 2017); however, they seem to be susceptible to natural climatic and other environmental changes and the negative effects of human activities (Suraprasit et al. 2020a; Isarankura Na Ayudhya et al. 2022). Their sensitivity is associated with habitat preferences (close ties to steep cliffs and rocky crags) and behavioural constraints. As a resident species with a high degree of fidelity to small territories in both sexes (Cho et al. 2014, 2016; Teng et al. 2021), they are highly vulnerable to severe weather conditions (abnormal snow depth), natural predators, intense habitat destruction and heavy hunting pressure (Mishra et al. 1998; Rabinowitz 1999; Aiyadurai et al. 2010; Perveen et al. 2013; Velho and Laurance 2013; Shakeel et al. 2015; Park and Hong 2021; Shepherd et al. 2022). Gorals are subjects of the illegal meat and fur trade, their body parts are used in traditional medicine, and they are considered trophies (Mishra et al. 2006; Shepherd et al. 2022). However, other factors, such as disease, e.g., goatpox, whose high emergence has recently been reported in Northeast India (Bora et al. 2021), may also be important in causing declines. In effect, all species are currently facing declines and further isolation in populations (Lee and Rhim 2002; Duckworth and MacKinnon 2008; Abbas et al. 2012; Saeed et al. 2012; Bragina et al. 2020; Nijhawan 2020). Their sedentary life might deepen the differentiation of populations over time and lead to a reduction of effective population sizes in fragmented habitats, which could be reliably detected by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) (Brown et al. 2004; Roberts 2006; Grandi et al. 2018).

Gorals have already been the subject of some conservation-based population genetics studies (Min et al. 2004; Yang et al. 2019). Most genetic studies of gorals, however, have been focused mainly on alpha taxonomy, which is crucial in establishing future effective conservation management. The recent (mainly genetic) assessments are based solely on mtDNA (e.g., Mori et al. 2019; Li et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2022). Although mtDNA has some known limitations (Wan et al. 2004; Fišer Pečnikar and Buzan 2014; Ritchie et al. 2016; Norman et al. 2019; Kowalczyk et al. 2021), these surveys are often logical in respect of available comparative gene and taxon sampling and availability from degraded samples, in comparison to nuclear or genomic DNA (Wan et al. 2004; Wandeler et al. 2007; Beja-Pereira et al. 2009). Therefore, various genetic assessments of different organisms still utilize mtDNA (Tobe et al. 2010; Gutiérrez et al. 2017; Kowalczyk et al. 2021; Leigh et al. 2021). Gorals themselves have been analysed using cytochrome b and the D-loop (Joshi et al. 2022), as well as the complete mitochondrial genome (Hassanin et al. 2012; Mori et al. 2019; Li et al. 2020). In contrast, the utility of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) remains unanalysed, even though it belongs to the gene markers that enable a correct species identification in many animal groups, including mammals (Tobe et al. 2010). COI was selected as the optimal marker for barcoding (e.g., within the International Barcode of Life initiative (https://ibol.org/about/dna-barcoding/) and in Tobe et al. 2009, 2010; and Fišer Pečnikar and Buzan 2014). The current coverage of goral taxa for COI resembles the coverage for other mt genes, cyt b and the D-loop (for details, see Suppl. material 1), but it also contains specimens from western limits of goral distribution, specifically from Pakistan (Machiara National Park), that have not yet been inspected for genetic data. These specimens can be labelled as Nemorhaedus bedfordi (sensu Groves and Grubb 2011) or N. goral (sensu Hrabina 2015), which partly demonstrates that the current taxonomy of gorals is unstable, conflicting, and somewhat confusing.

It is worth noting that attempts to decipher goral phylogeny and species diversity are hampered by several complicated factors, as follows: relative phenotypic similarity of goral taxa; rarity of localised collection specimens (Adlerberg 1932; Dolan 1963; Groves and Grubb 2011; PH – pers. obs.); and chromosomal conservatism (Soma et al. 1980, 1987). These parameters might be responsible for a higher probability of misidentification of goral voucher specimens, which appears to be a major cause of error in efforts to revise goral taxonomy. Concerning misidentifications, some studies (Li et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2022) have already revealed a misidentification based on the geographic origin of samples and their genetic affinities to other localised samples (Table 1).

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Detailed information for all goral sequence included in this study. Species are arranged alphabetically by scientific name.

Species name	Accession Numbers	Provenance	marker available	Reference
N. baileyi	JN632663	Yigong village, Linzhi City, Tibet, China	complete mitochondrion	Hassanin et al. 2012
N. baileyi	KP203894	Yigong village, Linzhi City, Tibet, China	complete mitochondrion	Shi et al. 2016
N. caudatus	FJ469673	South Korea	complete mitochondrion	Jang and Hwang 2010
N. cranbrooki	MN853098	Awadam village, Putao District, Myanmar	complete mitochondrion	Li et al. 2020
N. cranbrooki	MN853099	Tala Htu village, Putao District, Myanmar	complete mitochondrion	Li et al. 2020
N. cranbrooki	MN853101	Putao District, Myanmar	complete mitochondrion	Li et al. 2020
N. cranbrooki	MN853102	Ziyadam village, Putao District, Myanmar	complete mitochondrion	Li et al. 2020
N. cranbrooki	MN853103	Putao District, Myanmar	complete mitochondrion	Li et al. 2020
N. evansi	JN632664	Chiang Mai Province, Thailand	complete mitochondrion	Hassanin et al. 2012
N. evansi	MF155891	Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province, China	complete mitochondrion	Liu and Zhang 2018
N. evansi	MN853096	Putao District, Myanmar	complete mitochondrion	Li et al. 2020
N. goral	OK244620	Machiara National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan	complete COI gene	A. Naseem (The University of Sargodha, Pakistan) direct submission to GenBank
N. goral	OK244621	Machiara National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan	complete COI gene	A. Naseem (The University of Sargodha, Pakistan) direct submission to GenBank
N. goral	OK244622	Machiara National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan	complete COI gene	A. Naseem (The University of Sargodha, Pakistan) direct submission to GenBank
N. griseus	FJ207532	Central China	complete mitochondrion	Hassanin et al. 2009
N. griseus	JX188255	China	complete mitochondrion	Yang et al. 2013
N. griseus	KF500173	Wufeng Tujia Autonomous County, Hubei Province, China	complete mitochondrion	Zhang et al. 2015
N. griseus	KT878720	Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province, China	complete mitochondrion	Liu and Jiang 2017
N. griseus	MG591488	Wutai County, Shanxi Province, China	complete mitochondrion	Ren et al. 2018
N. griseus	MG865962	western Sichuan Province, China	complete mitochondrion	Yao et al. 2019

Concerning an imbalance between morphological and genetic revisions of gorals, although some authors have tried to compare taxa using morphological data (Suppl. material 1), only Dolan (1963) and Groves and Grubb (2011), possibly Groves and Grubb (1985), and Grubb (2005) have revised goral taxonomy using standard comparative methods (Mayr 1969; Mayr and Ashlock 1991; Groves and Grubb 2011). Unfortunately, the detailed arguments and datasets behind taxonomic opinions in the case of Groves and Grubb (1985), Grubb (2005), and somewhat in Groves and Grubb (2011), remain unspecified. Genetic studies are also confounded by the above complicating factors, as four taxonomic studies have appeared in the last decade with markedly different results (Hassanin et al. 2012; Mori et al. 2019; Li et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2022).

Although some different phylogenetic relationships and affinities revealed by genetic or morphological studies seem to be contradictory, the contradictions arise only from taxa sampling and voucher (mis)identifications (Suppl. material 1; Table 2). After the abandonment of some extremes, such as the oversplitting of variability (e.g., 15 new goral species described by Pierre-Marie Heude; see Heude 1894; Braun et al. 2001; Grubb 2005) or the probable overlumping (Haltenorth 1963, into only one goral species), morphology-based taxonomic revisions or reviews have converged to form six valid taxa of gorals since 2005. The molecular assessment of gorals has argued for three to seven valid taxa within three to six species of gorals (Suppl. material 1).

Table 2.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

List of goral complete mitochondrial genomes revised by different sources.

Accession Numbers	Organism (as specified in GenBank)	Li et al. (2020)	Joshi et al. (2022)	the present study	Data used for a revision
JN632664	Nemorhaedus griseus	Nemorhaedus evansi	Nemorhaedus evansi	Nemorhaedus evansi	GD, PR, SGO
MF155891	Nemorhaedus griseus	Nemorhaedus evansi	Nemorhaedus evansi	Nemorhaedus evansi	GD, PR
MG865962	Nemorhaedus goral		Nemorhaedus griseus	Nemorhaedus griseus	GD, PR, SGO
MG591488	Nemorhaedus goral		Nemorhaedus griseus	Nemorhaedus griseus	GD, PR, SGO
KT878720	Nemorhaedus goral		Nemorhaedus griseus	Nemorhaedus griseus	GD, PR, SGO
JX188255	Nemorhaedus goral			Nemorhaedus griseus	GD, PR
MN853096	Nemorhaedus evansi			hybrid between N. cranbrooki and N. evansi?	PF

Considering all noted factors, especially the limited sampling and unstable phylogeny and taxonomy of gorals, they deserve further assessment, since their concise taxonomy might be helpful for further conservation actions in respect of international and national laws. The current study aims to inspect the utility of COI for both the detection of phylogenetic relationships among goral taxa and the inspection of diversification among available goral COI voucher specimens, using genetic distances and single-locus species delimitation.

Gorals seem to represent an ideal model for these aims among caprines due to the available taxon-population sampling (i.e., due to the highest available numbers of complete mitogenomes), their sedentary lifestyle, the philopatry of females (Heptner et al. 1988; Yang et al. 2019) and perhaps their well-developed reproductive isolation mechanism, expressed as hybrid infertility (Volf 1976). Since gorals and serows represent the sister group to arctic dwelling musk-oxen (Hassanin et al. 2009), a much heavier and cold-adapted species, only one of which has survived, gorals might offer insight into the fascinating diversification and evolution of subtribe Ovibovina and all caprines (tribe Caprini).

Materials and methods

Originally, we used 134 complete COI sequences (altogether 1545 bp) of gorals and other members of the tribe Caprini (according to Hassanin et al. 2012 and Groves and Grubb 2011) using the GenBank database (available in November 2022; for GenBank accession numbers see Suppl. material 2). If a complete COI sequence was not available by itself, it was extracted from the complete mitochondrial genomes. Various phylogenetic analyses (see below) of this dataset with 134 taxa recovered an efficient resolution of COI for separating genera and species, but it was not able to provide a robust phylogenetic relationships among caprine genera. Similar observation was made by Tobe et al. (2010), who identified cyt b as the better marker for reconstructing mammalian phylogenies, compared to COI. According to these results, and general compatibilities with results by Hassanin et al. (2009, 2012) based on complete mitogenomes, we restricted the dataset to only goral sequences (Table 1) with a serows (Capricornis sp.) as the outgroup. Since the spelling of the generic name of ‘goral’ is questionable (see Groves and Grubb 2011), we searched for both variants in the GenBank database, i.e., Nemorhaedus and Naemorhedus, although the NCBI Taxonomy Browser recognized it as Naemorhedus within the subfamily Caprinae in the family Bovidae.

Considering similarities among goral species and some taxonomic inertia in this group during recent decades, all sequences were checked according to their localities using taxonomically sensitive sources (Groves and Grubb 2011; Hrabina 2015; Castelló 2016). This approach is sometimes essential for the correct interpretation of results (Ouellette 2001; Müller et al. 2013; Steppan and Schenk 2017; Bryja et al. 2018; Li et al. 2018). Additionally, our revision of taxa specification was made based on previously revealed misidentifications (e.g., Li et al. 2020; and Joshi et al. 2022) or on our examination of monophyly and genetic distances of sequences to other localised sequences.

The sequences were aligned using the MAFFT version 6 automatic multiple alignment programme for amino acid or nucleotide sequences (Katoh et al. 2009). They were subsequently adjusted manually using Bioedit (Hall 1999). Prior to the analyses, COI sequences were translated into amino acids in MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021) using the vertebrate mitochondrial translation code. This procedure did not detect any stop codons or gaps, suggesting that all protein-coding sequences were functional, and no pseudogenes were amplified.

Genetic distances were estimated based on Kimura’s two-parameter model (K2P) of substitutions in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011). We also estimated uncorrected genetic distances in the same software. This model has been selected for comparisons of other published distances for mammals (Bradley and Baker 2001; Baker and Bradley 2006).

The dataset was examined using various approaches: neighbour-joining (NJ), maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference methods (BI), respectively, within MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021) and MrBayes version 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001; Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). The best‐fitting substitution model for DNA sequence evolution was selected by MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021) under the Bayesian information criterion and Akaike information criterion. This evolution model, HKY+G+I, was determined for the complete sequence of COI. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis was performed with a Metropolis‐coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm (Altekar et al. 2004) within MrBayes version 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001; Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Nucleotide data were run for 5,000,000 generations with two runs, four chains for each run, and a sampling frequency of every 100^th generation; we discarded the first 10% of trees as burn-in. Convergence of MCMC analyses was diagnosed by the average standard deviation of split frequencies (ASDSF) within MrBayes version 3.1.2 (for references see above) and the effective sample size (ESS) value of the trace within Tracer v1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018).

The observed ASDSF values of around 0.002–0.003 and effective sample sizes of MCCM per each run of at least around 1107 meet the criteria for recommended convergence thresholds according to Lakner et al. (2008) and Fabreti and Höhna (2021).

To assess nodal support, the bootstrapping with 250 replicates (i.e., within the recommended range by Pattengale et al. 2010) for the NJ, MP and ML analyses and the posterior probabilities for the BI analysis were used and implemented in MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021) and MrBayes version 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001; Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003), respectively. We considered bootstrap values ≥ 75% and posterior probability values ≥ 0.95 as strong support, respectively.

To explore species boundaries in the COI ML and BI trees, we calculated several statistics using the Species Delimitation plugin (Masters et al. 2011) by Geneious, version 10.0.5 (Kearse et al. 2012). This plugin allows users to assign terminals of the detected phylogenetic tree to putative species, which we found using the most sensitive taxonomies of gorals. The Species Delimitation Plugin calculates several statistics relating to the phylogenetic exclusivity of each putative species, the probabilities that such exclusivity has arisen by chance in a random coalescent process, and the degree to which the species can be diagnosed (Masters et al. 2011; Gutiérrez et al. 2017). The plugin reports the following statistics (Masters et al. 2011): Intra Dist, the average pairwise tree distances among members of the putative species; Inter Dist, the average pairwise tree distance between the members of one putative species and the members of the closest second putative species; Intra/Inter, the ratio of Intra Dist to Inter Dist; P ID (Strict), the mean probability of correctly identifying an unknown member of the putative species using the criterion that it must fall within but not be sister to the species clade in a tree; P ID (Liberal), the mean probability of correctly identifying an unknown member of the putative species using the criterion that it must fall within, or be sister to, the species clade in a tree; Av (MRCA-tips), the mean distance between the most recent common ancestor of a putative species and its members; P (Randomly Distinct), the probability that a clade has the observed degree of distinctiveness due to random coalescent processes; Clade Support, the bootstrap or posterior probability associated with the putative species clade; and Rosenberg´s P (AB), the probability of reciprocal monophyly under a random coalescent model (for details, see Masters et al. 2011).

Results

Phylogenetic relationships

The 134 COI sequences exhibited a significant number of variable sites, specifically 558 from all 1545 bp, of which 509 were parsimony informative. The dataset provided significant support for two goral groups, which are definable by their distribution: group I, comprising N. baileyi+N. cranbrooki+N. evansi, occupies the southeastern part of the goral range, whereas group II, comprising N. goral+N. caudatus+N. griseus, includes samples from Pakistan, Central China and South Korea (Figs 1–4).

Figure 1.

Bayesian phylogenetic tree of COI sequences of gorals and serows. Detailed tree topology is given for gorals; posterior probabilities are given at branches of interest. The scale represents substitutions per site.

Goral group I exhibited the topology evansi+(baileyi+cranbrooki) consistently in all sorts of analyses (Figs 1–4). Identical topology was obtained by Li et al. (2020), based on complete mitochondrial genomes, as well as by Joshi et al. (2022), based on partial fragments of both the cyt b (404 bp) and the D-loop (225 bp) genes.

Figure 2.

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of COI sequences of gorals and serows. Detailed tree topology is given for gorals; bootstrap values are given at branches of interest. The scale represents substitutions per site.

Furthermore, the relationships among goral taxa in group II were dependent on an analytical approach. Specifically, the NJ and ML analyses detected goral+(caudatus+griseus) topology (Figs 2, 4), while the MP and BI analyses detected caudatus+(griseus–goral) topology, where specimens of N. goral formed a monophyletic cluster with the long branch nested inside N. griseus (Figs 1, 3). The second variant of relationships inside goral group II might be an artefact based on similarities among sequences when two specimens of N. griseus (KT878720, MG865962) exhibit mutual similarities, and dissimilarities to N. goral and the remaining N. griseus specimens for most nucleotide positions, but the KT878720 from Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province, China revealed a further eight (675, 693, 705, 822, 912, 963, 1029, 1482) similar positions to all N. goral specimens. The sequence KT878720 and the source population require further attention in relation to the quality of sequences and the possibility of the ancestral polymorphism, drift or some possible introgression event in the past. Contrary to our phylogenetic tree topology of Pakistani sequences, the samples of N. goral from Uttarakhand (India) form the sister group to all other goral species based on fragments of cyt b and the D-loop (see Joshi et al. 2022).

Figure 3.

Maximum-parsimony phylogenetic tree of COI sequences of gorals and serows. Detailed tree topology is given for gorals; bootstrap values are given at branches of interest. The scale represents substitutions per site.

Figure 4.

Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of COI sequences of gorals and serows. Detailed tree topology is given for gorals; bootstrap values are given at branches of interest. The scale represents substitutions per site.

Species delimitation statistics and genetic distances

The single-locus species delimitation statistics provided in their combination a support for the distinctiveness of all putative species (Tables 3, 4). Specifically, N. baileyi, N. cranbrooki and N. evansi from goral group I and N. caudatus from goral group II were well supported for both (ML and BI) gene trees, whereas N. griseus and N. goral were well supported only for the ML gene tree. As mentioned previously, the N. griseus sequence (KT878720) had an exceptional influence on the relationships between the N. griseus and N. goral specimens; when it was not included, N. griseus and N. goral were also well supported for the BI gene tree (data not shown).

Table 3.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Summary statistics from the Species Delimitation plugin of Geneious for Nemorhaedus species recovered in the Bayesian tree using data from COI. Species are arranged alphabetically by scientific name.

Species	Closest Species	Monophyletic?	Intra	Inter - Closest	Intra/Inter	P ID (strict)	P ID (liberal)	Av (MRCA-tips)	P (Randomly Distinct)	Clade Support	Rosenberg’s P(AB)
N. baileyi	N. cranbrooki	YES	0.002	0.032	0.05	0.57 (0.42, 0.72)	0.95 (0.8, 1.0)	7.860E-4	0.05	1.00	0.02
N. caudatus	N. griseus	YES	0.00E+00	0.035	0.00E+00	0.00E+00 (0.00E+00, 0.00E+00)	0.96 (0.83, 1.00)	0.00E+00	NA	NA	0.05
N. caudatus	N. griseus (eastern subclade)	YES	0.00E+00	0.028	0.00E+00	0.00E+00 (0.00E+00, 0.00E+00)	0.96 (0.83, 1.00)	0.00E+00	NA	NA	0.1
N. cranbrooki	N. baileyi	YES	0.002	0.032	0.06	0.90 (0.77, 1.00)	0.97 (0.87, 1.0)	9.303E-4	0.05	1.00	0.02
N. evansi	N. baileyi	YES	0.010	0.063	0.16	0.69 (0.51, 0.86)	0.92 (0.77, 1.0)	0.0081	0.14	1.00	1.85E-03
N. goral	N. griseus	YES	0.002	0.077	0.02	0.78 (0.60, 0.95)	1.0 (0.85, 1.0)	7.810E-4	0.05	1.00	0.17
N. goral	N. griseus (eastern subclade)	YES	0.002	0.099	0.02	0.78 (0.61, 0.96)	1.0 (0.86, 1.0)	7.933E-4	0.05	1.00	0.01
N. griseus	N. caudatus	NO	0.019	0.035	0.54	0.57 (0.45, 0.70)	0.85 (0.75, 0.95)	0.0117	0.05	0.90	0.05

Table 4.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Summary statistics from the Species Delimitation plugin of Geneious for Nemorhaedus species recovered in the maximum-likelihood tree using data from COI. Species are arranged alphabetically by scientific name.

Species	Closest Species	Monophyletic?	Intra	Inter - Closest	Intra/Inter	P ID (strict)	P ID (liberal)	Av (MRCA-tips)	P (Randomly Distinct)	Clade Support	Rosenberg’s P(AB)
N. baileyi	N. cranbrooki	YES	8.00E-6	0.025	3.2E-4	0.59 (0.44, 0.74)	0.98 (0.83, 1.0)	4.000E-6	0.05	1.00	0.02
N. caudatus	N. griseus	YES	0.00E+00	0.025	0.00E+00	0.00E+00 (0.00E+00, 0.00E+00)	0.96 (0.83, 1.0)	0.00E+00	NA	NA	0.05
N. cranbrooki	N. baileyi	YES	2.73E-4	0.025	0.01	0.93 (0.80, 1.0)	0.98 (0.88, 1.0)	1.406E-4	0.05	1.00	0.02
N. evansi	N. baileyi	YES	0.006	0.046	0.14	0.70 (0.52, 0.87)	0.93 (0.78, 1.0)	0.0056	0.81	1.00	1.85E-03
N. goral	N. griseus	YES	1.06E-5	0.078	1.3E-4	0.79 (0.62, 0.97)	1.0 (0.86, 1.0)	6.666E-6	0.05	1.00	1.85E-03
N. griseus	N. caudatus	YES	0.013	0.025	0.51	0.59 (0.47, 0.72)	0.86 (0.76, 0.96)	0.0078	0.07	0.50	0.05

Here we compare the statistics of species in much detail:

Larger values of intraspecific tree distances (see “Intra” in Tables 3, 4) indicate that the members of the species are more diverse, which applies to N. evansi and N. griseus, because they also originated from multiple distant sites. Species represented by sequences originating from a single locality/region (goral, baileyi and cranbrooki) have the lowest values of this metric. N. griseus exhibited exceptionally diverse intraspecific divergence values (nearly twice those of N. evansi), indicating a marked differentiation within the western subclade, consisting of samples from Sichuan Province and the eastern subclade of Hubei and Shanxi Provinces. Larger values of interspecific tree distances (see “Inter – Closest” in Tables 3, 4) indicate that the species groups are increasingly distinct. The majority of putative species (N. baileyi, N. cranbrooki, N. griseus and N. caudatus) exhibit similar values to this statistic, whereas N. evansi and N. goral have the largest values, which are two to four times higher than other putative species. Two other metrics, “P ID (strict)” and “P ID (liberal)”, show the probabilities of correctly identifying an unknown specimen of the focal species using the criteria that it must fall either within or be sister to the focal monophyletic species clade, respectively. The mean P ID (strict) were 0.6 and 0.59 as calculated with the ML and BI trees, respectively. In both analyses, N. cranbrooki (0.93 and 0.9) and N. goral (0.79 and 0.78) showed the largest value of this metric (Tables 3, 4). The mean values of P ID (liberal) were 0.95 and 0.94, as calculated with the ML and BI trees, respectively; in both analyses, all species had probabilities equal or above 0.95, with exception of N. evansi (0.92–0.93) and N. griseus (0.85–0.86). The probability that a clade has the observed degree of distinctiveness due to random coalescent processes (“P (Randomly Distinct)” in Tables 3, 4) is expressed with values between 0.05–1; all values in putative species of gorals fall within this range. All values of the probability that species will be reciprocally monophyletic under the null model of random coalescence (see “Rosenberg’s P(AB)” in Tables 3, 4) are ≤ 0.05, which support putative species as distinct species.

Uncorrected and K2P distances among goral species are shown in Table 5. Genetic divergence within the goral species ranged from 0.0 to 1.13% (Table 5). The average interspecific divergences within the two goral species groups ranged from 2.1 to 5.76%. Within goral group I, N. baileyi and N. cranbrooki showed the smallest interspecific distances, of 2.32%, whereas the largest values of interspecific distances, of 3.87%, were calculated between N. baileyi and N. evansi. In goral group II, the lowest value of interspecific distances between two geographically adjacent species, N. griseus and N. caudatus, was obtained, of 2.1%. However, the geographically most separated species in goral group II, N. caudatus and N. goral, showed the highest values of intraspecific genetic divergence. Three sequences of N. goral differed from the single available sample of N. caudatus by 5.76%. It is also important to note that high values of genetic distance, of 5.11%, also separated the remaining species in this group, N. goral and N. griseus. N. evansi is probably the most neglected and misidentified goral species, since it has not been considered a valid taxon by most authors (further discussed below), although it clearly represents a distinct evolutionary lineage of gorals (Hassanin et al. 2012; Li et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2022).

Table 5.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Matrix of genetic distances (percent sequence divergence) within and among species of genus Nemorhaedus. Average uncorrected (p) distances among conspecific sequences are arrayed along the diagonal, interspecific p distances are below the diagonal, and Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distances are above the diagonal. Species are arranged alphabetically by scientific name.

	N. baileyi	N. caudatus	N. cranbrooki	N. evansi	N. goral	N. griseus	N. griseus western group	N. griseus eastern group
N. baileyi	0.00	7.70	2.32	3.87	9.52	7.86	8.08	7.75
N. caudatus	6.73	–	7.00	6.99	5.76	2.10	3.03	1.77
N. cranbrooki	2.21	8.06	0.03	3.74	10.28	8.33	8.61	8.19
N. evansi	3.60	8.02	3.49	0.60	10.11	8.29	8.46	8.21
N. goral	8.09	6.43	8.62	8.52	0.00	5.11	4.08	5.63
N. griseus	6.84	2.19	7.19	7.18	4.66	1.13	–	–
N. griseus western group	7.02	2.88	7.42	7.32	3.79	–	0.4	1.8
N. griseus eastern group	6.75	1.72	7.10	7.14	5.10	–	1.58	0.6

Discussion

The phylogenetic consensus on two lines of gorals – baileyi–cranbrooki–evansi versus caudatus–goral–griseus (taxa ordered alphabetically) – obtained in this study is fully concordant with some other studies based on different mt genes or the whole mitogenomes (e.g., Li et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2022). Such a result implies that some unrelated goral taxa exhibit highly similar phenotypes (e.g., evansi and griseus), which means that their morphology could conceal their real phylogenetic relationships.

In terms of summarising various statistics relating to phylogenetic exclusivity, COI seems to support the distinctiveness of six goral taxa, specifically N. baileyi, N. caudatus, N. cranbrooki, N. evansi, N. goral and N. griseus. Our results exhibit a noticeable concordance with most attempts to revise gorals since 2005, especially with Grubb (2005), Groves and Grubb (2011) and Hrabina (2015), using morphological data, and Li et al. (2020) and Joshi et al. (2022), using mitochondrial DNA (Suppl. material 1); for exceptions, see below.

All authors of goral assessments since 2000 (Suppl. material 1) have accepted the validity of N. baileyi, N. caudatus and N. goral, so the morphological and genetic evidence appear to be in harmony. Agreement on the validity of N. baileyi and N. caudatus is unsurprising due to their marked phenotype, i.e., vivid orange-red colouration in N. baileyi, and pale grey colouration of shaggy fur and long tail tuft with white-coloured rim and dark dorsal stripe in N. caudatus. The acceptance of N. caudatus has also been supported via observations on its infertile hybrids (with N. griseus), under captivity conditions (Volf 1976).

Discussion of goral taxa, in order of years when they were described

Although the validity of N. goral is widely accepted because it was the first named species of the genus, it also represents the most complicated species from taxonomic and geographic perspectives. The first reason for this is that many authors still adopt the single-species concept in this genus first proposed by Allen (1930) (e.g., Chen et al. 2011; Li et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2017a, 2017b; Liu and Jiang 2017; Ren et al. 2018). Any studies considering multiple goral species should be aware of the geographic restriction of this group to the Himalayan region. Additionally, the grey-brown or brown-coloured gorals of the Himalayas may represent two species – N. goral and N. bedfordi (Lydekker 1905; Grubb 2005; Groves and Grubb 2011) or N. goral and N. hodgsoni, respectively (Pocock 1908; Lydekker 1913; Hayman 1961; Dolan 1963; Hrabina 2015). The two classifications differ according to the definition of the distribution boundary between both species (see Fig. 5). According to Groves and Grubb (2011), the Sutlej River in Himachal Pradesh, India forms the boundary of their distribution. In this case, N. bedfordi represents a valid name for the West Himalayan species, while the East Himalaya species is referred to as N. goral (syn. N. hodgsoni). In contrast, authors advocating the latter approach delimit the boundary between the two species to be approximately 100 km east of Kathmandu, Nepal. Therefore, the type locality of N. goral (syn. N. bedfordi) is contained in the distribution range of the West Himalayan species, and the name N. hodgsoni would thus become a valid name for the East Himalayan species, if it would be supported by species delimitation statistics in future. The sampling of the East Himalaya goral population is the major priority issue in goral taxonomy.

Figure 5.

Map of distribution range of grey and brown goral following two major zoogeographical concepts with consequences of their taxonomy. The black dots represent the type localities of the three available names for Himalayan taxa: N. bedfordi (Lydekker, 1905) (Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, India), N. goral (Hardwicke, 1825) (Kathmandu, Nepal) and N. hodgsoni Pocock, 1908 (Sikkim, India). The upper map shows a scheme where the distribution boundary between the two species is formed by the Sutlej River, Himachal Pradesh, India. N. bedfordi here represents a valid name for the western species, and the East Himalayan species is referred to as N. goral (see Groves and Grubb 2011). On the contrary, the bottom map shows the situation where the border is defined east of Kathmandu. In this case, the name N. goral represents the name for the Western Himalayan species, while the Eastern Himalayan species is listed as N. hodgsoni (see Hrabina 2015).

The second described species, N. caudatus, is one of the best studied goral species due to the various scientific studies from many fields based mainly on the population from South Korea. It has been consensually recognised as a valid species in all taxonomic studies adopting both morphological and molecular approaches (e.g., Groves and Grubb 2011; Hrabina 2015; Mori et al. 2019; Li et al. 2020). Although it is less susceptible to misidentification than other goral species, there exist several papers with apparent confusion, e.g., the record of observation of this species from Thingbu village, Arunachal Pradesh, India by Mishra et al. (2005). This record refers to an area approximately 3,300 km from the closest distribution ranges of N. caudatus, in Northeast China, Eastern Russia (Primorsky and Khabarovsk territories) and the Korean peninsula (Grubb 2005; Groves and Grubb 2011; Valdez 2011; Hrabina 2015). Most molecular studies conducted on N. caudatus have analysed fragments of the cyt b and D-loop genes and, except for one sequence from Russia, have been limited to samples from South Korea (Min et al. 2004; Jang et al. 2020). Min et al. (2004) have identified in 12 South Korean and 1 Russian sequences two haplotypes based on a short fragment of the cyt b gene that differed by only one nucleotide. The team also identified that the Korean and Russian sequences of N. caudatus are distinct from the Chinese sample of N. caudatus (U17861, from the San Diego Zoo). However, historical evidence (e.g., Dolan 1987; Matschei 2003) would suggest that this Chinese sequence should be reassessed as N. griseus. Although GenBank contains many molecular data on N. caudatus, the COI gene is represented by a single sample. While this does not allow for assessing intraspecific variation, the interspecific comparison with the closest related species, N. griseus, is notable. The average genetic distance between N. caudatus and N. griseus was calculated as 2.1% (K2P distance in Table 5), and geographically closer populations from Hubei and Shanxi Provinces of China (eastern clade of N. griseus) show much lower values of genetic distance to N. caudatus than sequences from Sichuan Province (western clade of N. griseus), at 1.77% and 3.03%, respectively (Table 5).

All recent morphology-based revisions have recognised the existence of N. griseus (Grubb 2005; Groves and Grubb 2011; Valdez 2011; Hrabina 2015), and even authors who have adopted the single-species concept list this taxon as a valid subspecies (Allen 1940; Dolan 1963; Mead 1989). However, two recent molecular-based studies have synonymised N. griseus with N. goral (Mori et al. 2019; Li et al. 2020), although this was due to misidentification of several specimens from China (Tables 1, 2). All central Chinese sequences of N. griseus are separated from the current study’s three Himalayan sequences of N. goral, from Pakistan, by a genetic distance of 5.11% (Table 5), which represents the highest value among the pair of closest species within all goral taxa. It is also important to note that in all our statistics, N. griseus and N. caudatus were assessed as the most closely related species (Tables 3–5). In contrast to all other gorals, N. griseus is a highly heterogeneous species with at least two clearly geographically separated maternal lineages: the western, from Sichuan Province, and the eastern, from Shanxi and Hubei Provinces. The maximum genetic distances between these two clades reach values comparable to interspecies ratios, namely 2.3% between the sequences KT878720 and FJ207532 (Suppl. material 3). Notably, these two clades seem to exhibit different diploid chromosomal numbers; specifically, a male N. griseus from Western Sichuan (western maternal line) showed diploid chromosomal number 2n = 54 (Shi et al. 1986; Liu et al. 1994), whereas a male and female from the eastern lineage originating from Beijing Zoo showed 2n = 56 (Soma et al. 1980; Biltueva et al. 2020; pers. com. of PH with particular holders of gorals). If these clades are further supported as distinct, they should be labelled as N. griseus Milne-Edwards, 1871 (western clade) and N. henryanus (Heude, 1890) (eastern clade).

It is also important to note that the genetic screening of COI nowhere near covers the entire distribution range of N. griseus. As the results of genotyping of mitochondrial fragments and microsatellite markers of nuclear DNA in animals from the northeastern limit of the species range, specifically from Songshan National Nature Reserve (Beijing) and Saihanwula National Nature Reserve (Inner Mongolia), suggest further increases in genetic distance (Yang et al. 2019), the authors have proposed separating these two populations as evolutionarily significant units that should be preserved for future generations.

While N. evansi was predominantly lumped with N. griseus-based morphological evidence, Groves and Grubb (2011), Valdez (2011) and Hrabina (2015) have argued for a morphological distinction. The first sequence, JN632664, of N. evansi originating in Thailand, was published by Hassanin et al. (2012), under the name N. griseus. The authors identified the Chinese and Thai populations of N. griseus as possible members of two distinct species, without taxonomic implications for the Thai voucher. Other studies analysing this sequence and other samples of this taxon have recognised it as a distinct goral species and not related to N. griseus at all (Li et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2022). This implies some portion of phenotype convergence, and other examples of such phenotype convergence include N. baileyi and Capricornis rubidus, and N. griseus and C. swinhoii. Our results support this distinction based on various statistics, aligning with other genetic studies based on mtDNA (e.g., Li et al. 2020; Joshi et al. 2022). Li et al. (2020) have added three additional sequences of N. evansi, of which two originate from Myanmar, where the species was already documented (Valdez 2011; Hrabina 2015). However, Li et al. (2020) have also identified this species in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, Guizhou Province, China, which lies outside the geographical limits of the previously documented species. The presented data support the quality and distinction of the JN632664 sequence and also indicate a low mitochondrial genetic differentiation in N. evansi throughout almost its entire distribution range, namely Thailand, Myanmar and China. The results reveal a 0% genetic distance between the populations of Chiang Mai Province, Thailand (JN632664) and Guizhou Province, China (MF155891) (Suppl. material 3). Although the comparison is based on only two individuals, this finding is surprising given the large geographical distance (approximately 1,470 km) between these two localities. This finding seems to be partly confirmed by highly restricted haplotype and nucleotide diversity within the Thai population (Ariyaraphong et al. 2021). It may indicate that the species originated from a small founder population that has recently expanded. Since the highest value (specifically 0.4%) of intraspecific genetic distance within a single population of N. evansi was found by Li et al. (2020) in Putao District, Myanmar, based on a complete mitochondrion, Northern Myanmar appears to represent a candidate for such a source population. Identifying the region with the highest infraspecific variability would be helpful for effective conservation management in this taxon. Li et al. (2020) have also provided interesting insights into interspecies interactions along contact zones between N. cranbrooki and N. evansi: the voucher animal of the MN853096 sequence from Northern Myanmar is indistinguishable from N. cranbrooki based on pelage colouration, but has been genetically identified as N. evansi. Given that there are no other known red-coloured specimens of N. evansi from India, Myanmar, Thailand or China, and that N. cranbrooki is also found in the Putao District, we expect that this animal might represent a natural hybrid. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the red coat colouration appeared to be the dominant trait in two hybrid males between N. griseus and N. baileyi at Beijing Zoo (Hrabina 2015). In conclusion, N. evansi should be resurrected based on its genetic and morphological distinction from other goral species. Considering the relatively rich literature on the Thai and Burmese populations of N. evansi in recent decades, it should be remembered that they were labelled as N. goral via the single-species approach (Mishra et al. 1998; Chaiyarat et al. 1999), as N. griseus via the taxonomic concept by Grubb (2005) (Hassanin et al. 2012; Treydte et al. 2013; Buranapim et al. 2014; Khonmee et al. 2014a, b, c; Li et al. 2014; Liu and Zhang 2018; Li et al. 2019; Jangtarwan et al. 2020; Ariyaraphong et al. 2021) and as N. caudatus via a classification proposed by Groves and Grubb (1985) (Tougard 2001; Pintana and Lakanavichian 2013). There are also studies that have adopted more than one taxonomic scheme (Suraprasit et al. 2016; Wattanapituksakul et al. 2018; Shoocongdej and Wattanapituksakul 2020; Suraprasit et al. 2020a, 2020b; Isarankura Na Ayudhya et al. 2022).

With reference to Groves and Grubb (2011), no differences were apparent in skulls and horns between West and East Himalayan species, and their taxonomic separation is based only on pelage characteristics, which is supported by Hrabina (2015). There are no COI sequences available for N. hodgsoni from the eastern Himalayas, so we had to rely on the only study, by Joshi et al. (2022), that provides a comparison of another marker. Referring to these authors, two partial fragments of the cyt b gene of N. hodgsoni (MT845352, MT845353) originating from Sikkim show a genetic divergence between the West Himalayan species N. goral (MT845345–MT845353) that ranges from 1.2 to 3.0%. This range corresponds to the genetic divergence between N. baileyi and N. cranbrooki, for which the authors calculated values of between 2.7 and 3.0% from the same dataset.

N. baileyi is one of the least studied species due to its remote, geographically restricted range and the almost complete absence of comparative material in world collections. The two sequences from our analyses both have a direct link to the breeding group in the Shanghai Zoo, which is currently the only holder of this species in captivity (Shi et al. 2016; Yuan et al. 2019). The founder animals of this stock were obtained from Yigong village (30°14'N, 94°49'E), Bayi District, Tibet, China. Much knowledge of this species is based on surveys of individuals from this facility (e.g., Liu et al. 1989; Liu et al. 1994; Guo et al. 2004; Xie 2006; Xiong et al. 2013; Yuan et al. 2019). Akin to other goral species, these sequences show virtually zero genetic distance as representatives of a single locality (Suppl. material 3; Table 5).

N. cranbrooki, as the latest goral taxa, described in 1961 by Hayman, has been predominantly synonymised with N. baileyi based on morphological evidence, but the molecular data presented by Li et al. (2020) and Joshi et al. (2022) has resurrected its validity. Here, presented gene tree-based species delimitation statistics seem to support its validity as well. The estimated average value of COI genetic distances between N. baileyi and N. cranbrooki, 2.32%, is similar to the average genetic distance between N. griseus and N. caudatus, 2.10% (Table 5). The two red-coloured species were also examined karyotypically and showed differences in the number of diploid chromosomes; specifically, two males of N. baileyi from Tibet showed 2n = 56 (Liu et al. 1989, 1994; Huang et al. 2005), while a male N. cranbrooki from Myanmar showed 2n = 55 (Hsu and Benirschke 1973). The same diploid number of chromosomes in N. cranbrooki was documented in a female N. evansi from Myanmar (Wurster 1972; Hsu and Benirschke 1973). Since the current sampling of N. baileyi and N. cranbrooki is limited, a denser sampling would detect phylogenetic exclusivity with much more precision.

Future perspectives

Considering the genetic sampling of published studies and currently inspected available GenBank and Barcode of Life Data System sequences, we recommend further attention be paid to the following taxa and populations:

As summarised in Suppl. material 1, our study, based on COI, did not compare populations labelled by some authors as arnouxianus (Zhejiang Province, China), hodgsoni (Sikkim, West Bengal, the western part of Arunachal Pradesh, and Bhutan) or raddeanus (Heilongjiang Province, China); the same absence of assessment of these taxa applies to the complete cyt b and the D-loop as well.
Considering currently restricted sampling of N. baileyi and N. cranbrooki, i.e., both species from just a single locality situated at the opposite ends of the distribution range of both taxa, we recommend that proper morphological and genetic assessments of the validity of N. cranbrooki and detection of distribution boundaries between both red-coloured taxa be carried out.
Better sampling of N. evansi might detect the source population for the historical expansion of this species; such a population maintaining the diversity would have exceptional conservation value. The individual associated with the sequence MN853096 should be inspected for nuclear DNA to identify its potential hybrid nature and the possible existence of hybrid zones of contact between this species and N. cranbrooki.
Consistent with our recognition of two clades within N. griseus, we recommend additional genetic sampling from different locations within the species range to detect their distributional boundaries (samples from Gansu and Shaanxi Provinces will play the most important role) and to recognise their genetic variability and accurate taxonomic position; from this perspective, it would also be useful to inspect the maternal genetic profile of infertile hybrid animals from Prague Zoo (see Groves and Grubb 2011, p. 254).
Since the sequence from the Mt. Qomolangma Nature Reserve, Tibet, China sample (JX188255, complete mitochondrion) exhibits strong genetic affinities with the eastern clade of N. griseus from Shanxi and Hubei Provinces, but its claimed provenance lies in the distribution range of N. goral sensu Hrabina 2015, based on pelage colour characteristics from this and surrounding regions as well as populations from Machiara NP and Kathmandu (e.g., figs 1, 10, 12 in Hrabina 2015), further assessment of this population is required.
To resolve the inconsistency in Himalayan goral taxonomy, we also recommend a genetic screening of goral populations near Kathmandu (the type locality of N. goral), and a subsequent comparison with samples from further western and eastern localities.
Since some taxa also seem to be supported by different chromosomal numbers, it would be worth inspecting the chromosomal variability of more specimens per goral taxa.
For species that are represented by samples from a single locality (i.e., N. goral, N. baileyi, N. cranbrooki and N. caudatus), we recommend a broader sampling across the entire distribution area to understand the true intraspecific diversity and phylogenetic position of each species.

In summary, COI exhibited a good resolution for separation species, but it did not contain a strong resolving power in the case of phylogenetic relationships. Since it provides very similar results to those of other mitochondrial genes (cyt b and the D-loop) used in assessments of goral phylogeny and taxonomy, we recommend sequencing of the complete sequence of all three mt genes for degraded samples from collections and the field. If the sample is well preserved, sequencing of the complete mitochondrial genome is highly recommended. It is worth mentioning that gorals are believed to represent sedentary caprines, with a limited male-based dispersal (Heptner et al. 1988); all results based on mt data might therefore provide a better structure in results than results based on Y-chromosome, microsatellite and genomic data. Therefore, multilocus or genomic data are highly recommended for the deciphering of all the above-mentioned issues, such as the detection of real phylogenetic relationships, the timing of diversification, and the portion of convergence and interspecific gene flows that could serve as sources of adaptive variation (Jónsson et al. 2014; Figueiró et al. 2017; Rakotoarivelo et al. 2019).

Considering complicating factors in deciphering goral phylogeny and taxonomy (see Introduction), we fully agree with Groves (2006) and Gutiérrez et al. (2017), who recognise the necessity to associate as much associated data with voucher specimens as possible. In practice, we highly recommend including a photograph of the DNA voucher specimens and detailed information about geographic origin in supplementary materials of published studies.

Incidentally, authors should be aware that excessive lumping of threatened taxa may have disastrous consequences for the future conservation prospects of forgotten narrow endemic ungulate taxa (Gippoliti et al. 2018). The deciphering of the goral taxonomy would represent a useful objective platform for rational conservation actions, reducing the negative human impact on this unique group of caprines.

Acknowledgements

Since we used data from the GenBank database, we would like to thank the enthusiastic and time-consuming work of all contributors of caprine sequences to the shared GenBank database. We would like to express our gratitude to the editor and to three referees for their critical reviews and very valuable suggestions, which greatly improved the final version of the manuscript. We are grateful to Anton Baer for the professional editing of the English.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

The project was supported by Mendel University in Brno through the Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of AgriSciences (MENDELU AF-IGA-2018-tym004).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: JR, PH. Data curation: PH, JR. Formal analysis: PH, JR, LP. Funding acquisition: JR, JS. Investigation: PH, JR, LP. Methodology: PH, LP, JR. Project administration: JS. Resources: PH, JR. Software: JR. Supervision: JR, PH. Validation: JR. Visualization: PH. Writing – original draft: JR, PH, LP. Writing – review and editing: JR, PH.

Author ORCIDs

Petr Hrabina https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3159-3737

Ludmila Pernerová https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3628-4647

Josef Suchomel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6455-135X

Jan Robovský https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8720-9314

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

Abbas F, Ruckstuhl KE, Mian A, Akhtar T, Rooney TP (2012) Distribution, population size, and structure of Himalayan grey goral Naemorhedus goral bedfordi (Cetartiodactyla: Bovidae) in Pakistan. Mammalia 76(2): 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2011-0038

Adlerberg G (1932) Critical review of the genera Nemorhaedus H. Smith and Capricornis Ogilby. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Otdeleniye Matematicheskikh i Estestvennykh Nauk 1932(7): 259–285.

Aiyadurai A, Navinder S, Milner-Gulland EJ (2010) Wildlife hunting by indigenous tribes: A case study from Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. Oryx 44(4): 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605309990937

Allen GM (1930) Bovidae from the Asiatic expeditions. American Museum Novitates 410: 1–11. https://digitallibrary.amnh.org/handle/2246/4390

Allen GM (1940) The Mammals of China and Mongolia. Vol. XI, part 2. American Museum of Natural History, New York, 1350 pp.

Altekar G, Dwarkadas S, Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2004) Parallel Metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20: 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg427

Ariyaraphong N, Pansrikaew T, Jangtarwan K, Thintip J, Singchat W, Laopichienpong N, Pongsanarm T, Panthum T, Suntronpong A, Ahmad SF, Muangmai N, Kongphoemph A, Wongsodchuen A, Intapan S, Chamchumroon W, Safoowong M, Duengkae P, Srikulnath K (2021) Introduction of wild Chinese gorals into a captive population requires careful genetic breeding plan monitoring for successful long-term conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation 28: e01675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01675

Baker RJ, Bradley RD (2006) Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1

Beja-Pereira A, Oliveira R, Alves PC, Schwartz MK, Luikart G (2009) Advancing ecological understandings through technological transformations in noninvasive genetics. Molecular Ecology Resources 9(5): 1279–1301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02699.x

Biltueva L, Graphodatsky A, Oda SI (2020) Naemorhedus goral (Goral). In: Graphodatsky AS, Perelman PL, O’Brien SJ (Eds) Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 814–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119418061.ch7

Bora DP, Ahmed J, Tadap S, Pariat AO, Mech P, Panda SP, Tashi T, Kakati P, Ingtipi S, Qayum A, Dutta LJ, Barman NN (2021) Evidence of transmission of goatpox between domestic goats and wild Himalayan goral (Naemorhedus goral) in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 57(2): 439–442. https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-20-00075

Bradley RD, Baker RJ (2001) A test of the Genetic Species Concept: Cytochrome b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 960–973. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082%3C0960:ATOTGS%3E2.0.CO;2

Bragina E, Kim S, Zaumyslova O, Park Y-S, Lee W (2020) Naemorhedus caudatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T14295A22150540. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T14295A22150540.en [February 28, 2023]

Braun A, Groves CP, Grubb P, Yang Q-S, Xia L (2001) Catalogue of the Musée Heude collection of mammal skulls. Dong Wu Fen Lei Xue Bao 26(4): 608–660.

Brown LM, Ramey RR, Tamburini B, Gavin TA (2004) Population structure and mitochondrial DNA variation in sedentary Neotropical birds isolated by forest fragmentation. Conservation Genetics 5: 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-004-1865-x

Bryja J, Konvičková H, Bryjová A, Mikula O, Makundi R, Chitaukali WN, Šumbera R (2018) Differentiation underground: Range-wide multilocus genetic structure of the silvery mole-rat does not support current taxonomy based on mitochondrial sequences. Mammalian Biology 98: 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.08.006

Buranapim N, Sitasuwan N, Kongprempoon A, Korkusol K, Siriaroonrat B, Kamolnorranath S (2014) Reintroduction and behavioral observations of Chinese gorals (Naemorhedus griseus) in natural conditions. Wetchasan Sattawaphaet 44(1): 75–83. https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjvm/article/view/17317

Castelló JR (2016) Bovids of the World: Antelopes, Gazelles, Cattle, Goats, Sheep, and Relatives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 664 pp. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400880652

Chaiyarat R, Laohajinda W, Kutintara U, Nabhitabhata J (1999) Ecology of the goral (Naemorhedus goral) in Omkoi Wildlife Sanctuary Thailand. The Natural History Bulletin of the Siam Society 47: 191–205.

Chen JY, Zhang LJ, Wang AM, Bater Nasendelger, Yuan L, Bao WD (2011) Population, distribution and food composition of wolves (Canis lupus) at Saihanwula Nature Reserve, Inner Mongolia. Zoological Research 32(2): 232–235. https://www.zoores.ac.cn/en/article/id/2924

Cho CU, Gyun GH, Yang JJ, Lim SJ, Lee AN, Park HB, Lee BK (2014) Home range and behavioral characteristics of the endangered Korea Gorals (Naemorhedus caudatus) with GPS collar. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 28: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.1.1

Cho CU, Kim KC, Kwon GH (2016) Habitat altitude and home range of the endangered long-tailed goral (Naemorhedus caudatus): Seasonal and monthly home range and altitude change. Mammalia 80(5): 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2015-0024

Damm GR, Franco N (2014) CIC Caprinae Atlas of the World. Volume II. CIC International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation and Rowland Ward Publications, Budakeszi (Hungary) and Houghton (South Africa), 571 pp.

Dinerstein E, Olson D, Joshi A, Vynne C, Burgess ND, Wikramanayake E, Hahn N, Palminteri S, Hedao P, Noss R, Hansen M, Locke H, Ellis EC, Jones B, Barber CV, Hayes R, Kormos C, Martin V, Crist E, Sechrest W, Price L, Baillie JEM, Weeden D, Suckling K, Davis C, Sizer N, Moore R, Thau D, Birch T, Potapov P, Turubanova S, Tyukavina A, de Souza N, Pintea L, Brito JC, Llewellyn OA, Miller AG, Patzelt A, Ghazanfar SA, Timberlake J, Klöser H, Shennan-Farpón Y, Kindt R, Lillesø JB, van Breugel P, Graudal L, Voge M, Al-Shammari KF, Saleem M (2017) An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67(6): 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014

Dolan JM (1963) Beitrag zur systematischen Gliederung des Tribus Rupicaprini, Simpson 1945. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 1: 311–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1963.tb00252.x

Dolan JM (1987) The mammal collection of the Zoological Society of San Diego, a historical perspective. Part I: Antilopinae to Bovinae. Der zoologische Garten N. F. 57(2/3): 116–166.

Duckworth JW, MacKinnon J (2008) Naemorhedus goral. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T14296A4430073. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T14296A4430073.en [February 28, 2023]

Fabreti LG, Höhna S (2021) Convergence assessment for Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MCMC simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13(1): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13727

Figueiró HV, Li G, Trindade FJ, Assis J, Pais F, Fernandes G, Santos SHD, Hughes GM, Komissarov A, Antunes A, Trinca CS, Rodrigues MR, Linderoth T, Bi K, Silveira L, Azevedo FCC, Kantek D, Ramalho E, Brassaloti RA, Villela PMS, Nunes ALV, Teixeira RHF, Morato RG, Loska D, Saragüeta P, Gabaldón T, Teeling EC, O’Brien SJ, Nielsen R, Coutinho LL, Oliveira G, Murphy WJ, Eizirik E (2017) Genome-wide signatures of complex introgression and adaptive evolution in the big cats. Science Advances 3(7): e1700299. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700299

Fišer Pečnikar Ž, Buzan EV (2014) 20 years since the introduction of DNA barcoding: From theory to application. Journal of Applied Genetics 55(1): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-013-0180-y

Gippoliti S, Cotterill FPD, Groves CP, Zinner D (2018) Poor taxonomy and genetic rescue are possible co-agents of silent extinction and biogeographic homogenization among ungulate mammals. Biogeographia—The Journal of Integrative Biogeography 33: 41–54. https://doi.org/10.21426/B633039045

Grandi MF, de Castro RL, Terán E, Santos MR, Bailliet G, Crespo EA (2018) Is recolonization pattern related to female philopatry? An insight into a colonially breeding mammal. Mammalian Biology 89: 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2017.12.002

Groves CP (2006) The genus Cervus in eastern Eurasia. European Journal of Wildlife Research 52(1): 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-005-0011-5

Groves CP, Grubb P (1985) Reclassification of the serows and gorals (Nemorhaedus: Bovidae). In: Lovari S (Ed.) The biology and management of mountain ungulates. Croom Helm, London, 45–50.

Groves CP, Grubb P (2011) Ungulate Taxonomy. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 317 pp. https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421400938

Grubb P (2005) Order Artiodactyla. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM (Eds) Mammal Species of the World, 3^rd ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 637–722.

Guo WL, Pei EL, Li ZK, Wang AS, Tu RX (2004) Preliminary observation on eco-biology of captive red goral (Naemorhedus cranbrooki). Shou Lei Xue Bao 24(1): 82–83. [In Chinese with English summary]

Gutiérrez EE, Helgen KM, McDonough MM, Bauer F, Hawkins MTR, Escobedo-Morales LA, Patterson BD, Maldonado JE (2017) A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: The importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling. ZooKeys 697: 87–131. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.697.15124

Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.

Haltenorth T (1963) Klassifikation der Säugetiere: Artiodactyla. Handbuch der Zoologie, W. de Gruyter, Berlin, 167 pp.

Hassanin A, Ropiquet A, Couloux A, Cruaud C (2009) Evolution of the mitochondrial genome in mammals living at high altitude: New insights from a study of the tribe Caprini (Bovidae, Antilopinae). Journal of Molecular Evolution 68: 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-009-9208-7

Hassanin A, Delsuc F, Ropiquet A, Hammer C, van Vuuren BJ, Matthee C, Ruiz-Garcia M, Catzeflis F, Areskoug V, Nguyen TT, Couloux A (2012) Pattern and timing of diversification of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria), as revealed by a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial genomes. Comptes Rendus Biologies 335: 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2011.11.002

Hayman RW (1961) The red goral of the north-east frontier region. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 136(3): 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1961.tb05875.x

Heptner VG, Nasimovich AA, Bannikov AG (1988) Mammals of the Soviet Union. Vol. 1. Artiodactyla and Perissodactyla. Smithsonian Institution Libraries and National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1147 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.46297

Heude P-M (1894) Notes sur le genre Kemas (Ogilby, 1836). Mémoires concernant l’histoire naturelle de l’Empire chinois par des Pères de la Compagnie de Jésus 2(4): 234–245.

Hrabina P (2015) A new insight into the taxonomy and zoogeography of recent species of goral (Nemorhaedus, Bovidae, Ruminantia). Gazella 42: 33–91. https://www.zoopraha.cz/gazella/vydani-casopisu/13892-gazella-42-2015

Hsu TC, Benirschke K (1973) Naemorhedus goral (Goral). In: Hsu TC, Benirschke K (Eds) An Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes. Volume 7. Springer, New York, 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9826-7_42

Huang L, Nie W, Wang J, Su W, Yang F (2005) Phylogenomic study of the subfamily Caprinae by cross‐species chromosome painting with Chinese muntjac paints. Chromosome Research 13(4): 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-005-0977-6

Huelsenbeck J, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17(8): 754–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754

Isarankura Na Ayudhya J, Merceron G, Wannaprasert T, Jaeger J-J, Chaimanee Y, Shoocongdej R, Suraprasit K (2022) Dental mesowear and microwear for the dietary reconstruction of Quaternary Southeast Asian serows and gorals. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10: 1000168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1000168

Jang KH, Hwang UW (2010) Complete mitochondrial genome of the Korean goral Naemorhaedus caudatus (Ruminantia, Bovidae, Antilopinae) and conserved domains in the control region of Caprini. Mitochondrial DNA 21: 62–64. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2010.490833

Jang JE, Kim NH, Lim S, Kim KY, Lee HJ, Park YC (2020) Genetic integrity and individual identification-based population size estimate of the endangered long-tailed goral, Naemorhedus caudatus from Seoraksan National Park in South Korea, based on a non-invasive genetic approach. Animal Cells and Systems (Seoul) 24(3): 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2020.1784273

Jangtarwan K, Kamsongkram P, Subpayakom N, Sillapaprayoon S, Muangmai N, Kongphoemph A, Wongsodchuen A, Intapan S, Chamchumroon W, Safoowong M, Peyachoknagul S, Duengkae P, Srikulnath K (2020) Predictive genetic plan for a captive population of the Chinese goral (Naemorhedus griseus) and prescriptive action for ex situ and in situ conservation management in Thailand. PLoS ONE 15(6): e0234064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234064

Jónsson H, Schubert M, Seguin-Orlando A, Ginolhac A, Petersen L, Fumagalli M, Albrechtsen A, Petersen B, Korneliussen TS, Vilstrup JT, Lear T, Myka JL, Lundquist J, Miller DC, Alfarhan AH, Alquraishi SA, Al-Rasheid KA, Stagegaard J, Strauss G, Bertelsen MF, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Antczak DF, Bailey E, Nielsen R, Willerslev E, Orlando L (2014) Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(52): 18655–18660. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412627111

Joshi BD, Singh VK, Singh H, Bhattacharjee S, Singh A, Singh SK, Chandra K, Sharma LK, Thakur M (2022) Revisiting taxonomic disparities in the genus Naemorhedus: New insights from Indian Himalayan Region. Mammalia 86(4): 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2021-0152

Katoh K, Asimenos G, Toh H (2009) Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J. ) 537: 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_3

Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28(12): 1647–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199

Khonmee J, Brown JL, Rojanasthien S, Aunsusin A, Thumasanukul D, Kongphoemphun A, Siriaroonrat B, Tipkantha W, Punyapornwithaya V, Thitaram C (2014a) Gender, season and management affect fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in captive goral (Naemorhedus griseus) in Thailand. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091633

Khonmee J, Brown JL, Taya K, Rojanasthien S, Punyapornwithaya V, Thumasanukul D, Kongphoemphun A, Siriaroonrat B, Tipkantha W, Pongpiachan P, Thitaram C (2014b) Assessment of ovarian activity in captive goral (Naemorhedus griseus) using noninvasive fecal steroidmonitoring. Theriogenology 82(7): 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.07.012

Khonmee J, Brown JL, Rojanasthien S, Thumasanukul D, Kongphoemphun A, Siriaroonrat B, Tipkantha W, Punyapornwithaya V, Thitaram C (2014c) Seasonality of fecal androgen and glucocorticoid metabolite excretion in male goral (Naemorhedus griseus) in Thailand. Animal Reproduction Science 146(1–2): 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.02.008

Kowalczyk M, Staniszewski A, Kamiñska K, Domaradzki P, Horecka B (2021) Advantages, possibilities, and limitations of mitochondrial DNA analysis in molecular identification. Folia Biologica (Kraków) 69(3): 101–111. http://www.isez.pan.krakow.pl/journals/folia/pdf/69(3)/69(3)_01.pdf

Lakner C, van der Mark P, Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Ronquist F (2008) Efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo tree proposals in Bayesian phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 57(1): 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150801886156

Lee WS, Rhim SJ (2002) Changes in distribution of Amur goral (Nemorhaedus caudatus) in South Korea. Shou Lei Xue Bao 22(3): 225–227. http://www.mammal.cn/EN/Y2002/V22/I3/225

Leigh DM, van Rees CB, Millette KL, Breed MF, Schmidt C, Bertola LD, Hand BK, Hunter ME, Jensen EL, Kershaw KF, Liggins L, Luikart G, Manel S, Mergeay J, Miller JM, Segelbacher G, Hoban S, Paz-Vinas I (2021) Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies. Nature Reviews Genetics 22: 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00394-0

Li S, McShea WJ, Wang D, Huang J, Shao L (2012) A direct comparison of camera-trapping and sign transects for monitoring wildlife in the Wanglang National Nature Reserve, China. Wildlife Society Bulletin 36(3): 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.161

Li X, Buzzard PJ, Jiang X-L (2014) Habitat associations of four ungulates in mountain forests of southwest China, based on camera trapping and dung counts data. Population Ecology 56: 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-013-0405-2

Li X, Shen X, Chen X, Xiang D, Murphy RW, Shen Y (2018) Detection of potential problematic Cytb gene sequences of fishes in GenBank. Frontiers in Genetics 9: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00030

Li F, Huang XY, Zhang XC, Zhao XX, Yang JH, Chan BPL (2019) Mammals of Tengchong Section of Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve in Yunnan Province, China. Journal of Threatened Taxa 11(11): 14402–14414. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.4439.11.11.14402-14414

Li G, Sun N, Swa K, Zhang M, Htet Lwin Y, Rui‐Chang Quan R-C (2020) Phylogenetic reassessment of gorals with new evidence from northern Myanmar reveals five distinct species. Mammal Review 50(4): 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12200

Liu Y, Jiang L (2017) The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the Himalayan goral, Naemorhedus goral (Cetartiodactyla: Caprinae). Mitochondrial DNA, Part A, DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis 28: 233–235. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1115856

Liu Y, Zhang M (2018) The complete mitochondrial genome of Naemorhedus griseus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) and its phylogenetic implications. Conservation Genetics Resources 10: 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-017-0794-1

Liu R-Q, Shi L-M, Chen Y-Z, Zhang C (1989) The karyotype of red goral (Naemorhedus cranbrooki). Zoological Research 10(2): 106. [In Chinese]

Liu R-Q, Chen Y-Z, Shi L-M, Zhang C (1994) Comparative studies on karyotypes between N. cranbrooki and N. g. griseus. Zoological Research 15(4): 49–54. [In Chinese with English summary] https://www.zoores.ac.cn/en/article/id/2245

Liu X, Wu P, Shao X, Songer M, Cai Q, He X, Zhu Y (2017a) Diversity and activity patterns of sympatric animals among four types of forest habitat in Guanyinshan Nature Reserve in the Qinling Mountains, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 24(19): 16465–16477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9232-x

Liu X, Wu P, Shao X, Songer M, Cai Q, Zhu Y, He X (2017b) Spatiotemporally monitoring forest landscape for giant panda habitat through a high learning-sensitive neural network in Guanyinshan Nature Reserve in the Qinling Mountains, China. Environmental Earth Sciences 76(17): 589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6926-9

Lydekker R (1905) The gorals of India and Burma. The Zoologist: A Monthly. Journal of Natural History 9(765): 81–84.

Lydekker R (1913) Artiodactyla, Family Bovidae, Subfamilies Bovinae to Ovibovinae (Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Chamois, Serows, Takin, Musk-Oxen, etc.). Vol. 1. of Catalogue of the ungulate mammals in the British Museum (Natural History). British Museum (Natural History), London, 249 pp.

Masters BC, Fan V, Ross HA (2011) Species delimitation – a geneious plugin for the exploration of species boundaries. Molecular Ecology Resources 11(1): 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02896.x

Matschei C (2003) Haltung und Zucht von Goralen, Nemorhaedus (Smith, 1827), in Zoologischen Gärten von Nordamerika, Europa und Singapur. Milu 11(1): 43–56.

Mayr E (1969) Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill Companies, 1^st Ed., New York, 428 pp.

Mayr E, Ashlock PK (1991) Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill Companies, First Edition, New York, 475 pp.

Mead JI (1989) Nemorhaedus goral. Mammalian Species 335: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504167

Min MS, Okumura H, Jo DJ, An JH, Kim KS, Kim CB, Shin NS, Lee MH, Han CH, Voloshina IV, Lee H (2004) Molecular phylogenetic status of the Korean goral and Japanese serow based on partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Molecules and Cells 17(2): 365–372.

Mishra C, Raman TRS, Johnsingh AJT (1998) Habitat, hunting and conservation of rupicaprines in Mizoram, northeast India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 95(2): 215–220. https://archive.org/details/biostor-152501/mode/2up

Mishra C, Datta A, Madhusudan MD (2005) Record of the Chinese goral Naemorhedus caudatus in Arunachal Pradesh. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 102(2): 225–228. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/154819

Mishra C, Madhusudan MD, Datta A (2006) Mammals of the high altitudes of western Arunachal Pradesh, eastern Himalaya: An assessment of threats and conservation needs. Oryx 40(1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605306000032

Mori E, Nerva L, Lovari S (2019) Reclassification of the serows and gorals: The end of a never ending story? Mammal Review 49: 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12154

Müller L, Gonçalves GL, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Marinho JR, Althoff SL, Testoni AF, González EM, Freitas TRO (2013) DNA Barcoding of sigmodontine rodents: Identifying wildlife reservoirs of zoonoses. PLoS ONE 8: e80282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080282

Nijhawan S (2020) Naemorhedus baileyi (amended version of 2020 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T14294A179947455. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T14294A179947455.en [February 28, 2023]

Norman AJ, Putnam AS, Ivy JA (2019) Use of molecular data in zoo and aquarium collection management: Benefits, challenges, and best practices. Zoo Biology 38: 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21451

Ouellette F (2001) Users must help to keep public databases correct. Nature 409: 452. https://doi.org/10.1038/35054237

Park HB, Hong S (2021) Habitat characteristics coincidence of dead and living long-tailed gorals (Naemorhedus caudatus) according to extreme snowfall. Animals (Basel) 11(4): 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040997

Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A (2010) How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Journal of Computational Biology 18(3): 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2009.0179

Perveen F, Khan A, Shah AH (2013) Hunting and trapping pressures on the Himalayan goral, Naemorhedus goral (Hardwicke) (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) in Kohistan, Pakistan. American Journal of Zoological Research 1(1): 5–11.

Pintana D, Lakanavichian S (2013) Goral ecology and conservation for community-based ecotourism in northern Thailand. International Journal of Asian Tourism Management 4(1): 23–36.

Pocock RI (1908) Notes upon some species and geographical races of serows (Capricornis) and gorals (Naemorhedus), based upon specimens exhibited in the Society’s Gardens. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1908: 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1908.tb01843.x

Rabinowitz A (1999) Notes on the rare red goral (Naemorhedus baileyi) of north Myanmar. Mammalia 63(1): 119–123.

Rakotoarivelo AR, O’Donoghue P, Bruford MW, Moodley Y (2019) An ancient hybridization event reconciles mito-nuclear discordance among spiral-horned antelopes. Journal of Mammalogy 100(4): 1144–1155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz089

Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032

Ren Z, Wang Y, Zhu J, Su X (2018) Complete mitochondrial genome of Naemorhedus goral (Caprinae), a threatened species from the Himalayan and Hindu Kush regions. Conservation Genetics Resources 10: 855–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-017-0947-2

Ritchie AM, Lo N, Ho SYW (2016) Examining the sensitivity of molecular species delimitations to the choice of mitochondrial marker. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 16: 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-016-0275-5

Roberts TE (2006) Multiple levels of allopatric divergence in the endemic Philippine fruit bat Haplonycteris fischeri (Pteropodidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 88: 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00616.x

Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3 Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19(12): 1572–1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180

Saeed K, Haq F, Baqi F, Khan S (2012) Present status of the threatened fauna of district Buner Pakistan. International Journal of Biosciences 2(12): 120–124.

Shakeel U, Minhas RA, Awan MS, Bibi SS, Iftikhar N (2015) Conservation status of Himalayan grey goral (Naemorhedus goral bedfordi Hardwicke, 1825) in Machiara National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 47(5): 1297–1304.

Shepherd CR, Gomez L, Siriwat P, Nijman V (2022) Wildlife conservation in Myanmar: Trade in wild sheep and goats for meat, medicine, and trophies, with links to China, India, and Thailand. European Journal of Wildlife Research 68: 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-022-01622-6

Shi LM, Liu RQ, Mo B (1986) A goral with diploid chromosome number of 54. Mammalian Chromosomes Newsletter 27(1–4): 99.

Shi R, Sun Y, Teng L, Liu Z (2016) Complete mitochondrial genome of red goral (Naemorhedus baileyi) and a complete estimate of the phylogenetic relationships in Caprinae. Mitochondrial DNA, Part A, DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis 27(4): 2721–2722. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1046163

Shoocongdej R, Wattanapituksakul A (2020) Faunal assemblages and demography during the Late Pleistocene (MIS 2-1) to Early Holocene in Highland Pang Mapha, Northwest Thailand. Quaternary International 563: 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.01.022

Soma H, Kada H, Matayoshi K, Kiyokawa T, Ito T, Miyashita M, Nagase K (1980) Some chromosomal aspects of Naemorhedus goral (goral) and Procapra gutturosa (Mongolian gazelle). Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences 56(5): 273–277. https://doi.org/10.2183/pjab.56.273

Soma H, Kada H, Matayoshi K (1987) Evolutionary pathways of karyotypes of the tribe Rupicaprini. In: Soma H (Ed.) The biology and management of Capricornis and related mountain antelopes. Croom Helm, London, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8030-6_4

Steppan SJ, Schenk JJ (2017) Muroid rodent phylogenetics: 900-species tree reveals increasing diversification rates. PLoS ONE 12(8): e0183070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183070

Suraprasit K, Jaeger J-J, Chaimanee Y, Chavasseau O, Yamee C, Tian P, Panha S (2016) The Middle Pleistocene vertebrate fauna from Khok Sung (Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand): Biochronological and paleobiogeographical implications. ZooKeys 613: 1–157. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.613.8309

Suraprasit K, Jaeger J-J, Chaimanee Y, Sutcharit C (2020a) Taxonomic reassessment of large mammals from the Pleistocene Homo-bearing site of Tham Wiman Nakin (Northeast Thailand): Relevance for faunal patterns in mainland Southeast Asia. Quaternary International 603(2021): 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.06.050

Suraprasit K, Jaeger J-J, Shoocongdej R, Chaimanee Y, Wattanapituksakul A, Bocherens H (2020b) Long-term isotope evidence on the diet and habitat breadth of Pleistocene to Holocene Caprines in Thailand: Implications for the Extirpation and Conservation of Himalayan gorals. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8: 67. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00067

Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(10): 2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121

Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38(7): 3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120

Teng Y, Tang S, Menghe D, Wu L, Han Z (2021) A pilot study on home range and habitat use of Chinese goral (Naemorhedus griseus): Exploring GPS tracking data in cliff landscape by three estimation methods. Preprint available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-597882/v1

Tobe SS, Kitchener A, Linacre A (2009) Cytochrome b or cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for mammalian species identification—An answer to the debate. Forensic Science International. Genetics Supplement Series 2(1): 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.08.053

Tobe SS, Kitchener AC, Linacre AMT (2010) Reconstructing mammalian phylogenies: A detailed comparison of the cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunit I mitochondrial genes. PLoS ONE 5(11): e14156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014156

Tougard C (2001) Biogeography and migration routes of large mammal faunas in South–East Asia during the Late Middle Pleistocene: Focus on the fossil and extant faunas from Thailand. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 168(3–4): 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00243-1

Treydte AC, Trumpf P, Langenberger G, Yang Y, Liu F (2013) Wild ungulate distribution in the Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve, Southwest China. Journal of Tropical Forestry and Environment 3(2): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.31357/jtfe.v3i2.1843

Valdez R (2011) Genus Nemorhaedus. In: Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA (Eds) Handbook of the mammals of the world. Vol. 2. Hoofed mammals. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 743–745.

Velho N, Laurance WF (2013) Hunting practices of an Indo-Tibetan Buddhist tribe in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. Oryx 47(3): 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605313000252

Volf J (1976) Some remarks on the taxonomy of the genus Nemorhaedus H. Smith, 1827 (Bovidae: Rupicaprinae). Věstník Československé Společnosti Zoologické 40: 75–80.

Wan QH, Wu H, Fujihara T, Fang SG (2004) Which genetic marker for which conservation genetics issue? Electrophoresis 25(14): 2165–2176. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305922

Wandeler P, Hoeck PEA, Keller LF (2007) Back to the future: Museum specimens in population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22(12): 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.08.017

Wattanapituksakul A, Filoux A, Amphansri A, Tumpeesuwan S (2018) Late Pleistocene Caprinae assemblages of Tham Lod Rockshelter (Mae Hong Son Province, Northwest Thailand). Quaternary International 493: 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.06.003

Wu P-F, Liu X-H, Cai Q, He X-B, Songer M, Zhu Y, Shao X-M (2012) The application of infrared camera in mammal research in Guanyinshan Nature Reserve, Shaanxi. Shou Lei Xue Bao 32(1): 67–71. http://www.mammal.cn/EN/Y2012/V32/I1/67

Wurster DH (1972) Sex-chromosome translocations and karyotypes in bovid tribes. Cytogenetics 11(3): 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1159/000130189

Xie Y (2006) Primary observations on rutting behavior of the captive red goral. Zoo Biology 25(2): 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20086

Xiong Z, Chen M, Zhang E, Huang M (2013) Molecular phylogeny and taxonomic status of the red goral by cyt b gene analyses. Folia Zoologica 62(2): 125–129. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v62.i2.a7.2013

Yang C, Xiang C, Qi W, Xia S, Tu F, Zhang X, Moermond T, Yue B (2013) Phylogenetic analyses and improved resolution of the family Bovidae based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 48: 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2012.12.005

Yang J, Zhu GF, Jiang J, Xiang CL, Gao FL, Bao WD (2019) Non-invasive genetic analysis indicates low population connectivity in vulnerable Chinese gorals: Concerns for segregated population management. Zoological Research 40(5): 439–448. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2019.058

Yao Y, Li D, Xie M, Ni Q, Zhang M, Xu H (2019) The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogeny of a wild goral from the western Sichuan of China (Naemorhedus caudatus griseus). Conservation Genetics Resources 11: 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-018-1024-1

Yuan Z, Huang K, Liu Q (2019) Population status and genetic analysis of captive red goral (Naemorhedus baileyi) in Shanghai Zoo, China. Folia Zoologica 68(4): 285–293. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.028.2019

Zhang B, Pan T, Ren L, Wang H, Hu C (2015) Mitochondrial genome of the Naemorhedus griseus (Bovidae: Naemorhedus). Mitochondrial DNA 26(4): 636–637. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2013.836512

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Goral species recognized in the 20^th and 21^st centuries across several basic sources, which seemed to assess gorals independently and/or using different data

Petr Hrabina, Ludmila Pernerová, Josef Suchomel, Jan Robovský

Data type: xlsx

Explanation note: Taxa are arranged alphabetically by scientific names.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Download file (13.22 kb)

Supplementary material 2

List of taxa and GenBank accession numbers used for the original gene analysis with 134 COI sequences

Petr Hrabina, Ludmila Pernerová, Josef Suchomel, Jan Robovský

Data type: xlsx

Explanation note: Taxa are arranged alphabetically by scientific names.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Download file (14.75 kb)

Supplementary material 3

Genetic Kimura two-parameter distances for COI genes among Nemorhaedus and Capricornis species

Petr Hrabina, Ludmila Pernerová, Josef Suchomel, Jan Robovský

Data type: xls

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Download file (57.00 kb)

﻿Abstract

Key words

﻿Introduction

﻿Materials and methods

﻿Results

﻿Phylogenetic relationships

﻿Species delimitation statistics and genetic distances

﻿Discussion

﻿Discussion of goral taxa, in order of years when they were described

﻿Future perspectives

﻿Acknowledgements

﻿Additional information

Conflict of interest

Ethical statement

Funding

Author contributions

Author ORCIDs

Data availability

﻿References

Supplementary materials

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Phylogenetic relationships

Species delimitation statistics and genetic distances

Discussion

Discussion of goral taxa, in order of years when they were described

Future perspectives

Acknowledgements

Additional information

References