Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of the genus Alainites Waltz & McCafferty, 1994 (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae) from the north of Morocco
expand article infoMajida El Alami, Laurent Vuataz§|, Sara El Yaagoubi, Jean-Luc Gattolliat§|
‡ Université Abdelmalek Essaâdi, Tétouan, Morocco
§ Muséum Cantonal des Sciences Naturelles, Département de Zoologie, Lausanne, Switzerland
| University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Open Access

Abstract

A new species of Alainites is described from northern of Morocco Alainites albai sp. nov. It can be separated from the other west Palearctic species by the gill number, the spination of the distal margin of tergites, the leg setation, and the paraproct shape and spination. This species is widespread in the study area but never abundant. It prefers small to medium streams with slow flow, and does not seem to be very sensitive to pollution and water logging activities.

Key words

COI, endemics, Maghreb, mayflies, Rif, systematics, West Palaearctic

Introduction

The mayfly genus Alainites Waltz & McCafferty, 1994 was established to encompass species previously included in the muticus species group of the genus Baetis Leach, 1815 (Waltz et al. 1994). Currently, this genus encompasses 22 species (Barber-James et al. 2013; Kaltenbach and Gattolliat 2021; Phlai-ngam et al. 2022; Yanai et al. 2022). Also, the distribution of Alainites is nearly limited at the Palaearctic and Oriental regions; so far, the highest diversity is found in the West Palaearctic region with eight species. Except Alainites muticus (Linnaeus, 1758) which has a wide distribution in Europe (Bauernfeind and Soldán 2012) and has also been recently reported from western Asia (Armenia, Hrivniak et al. 2018) and Iran (Bojková et al. 2018), this genus has a high endemism rate in the Mediterranean basin. During the last decades, seven species with mostly restricted distributions have been described. These are A. oukaimeden (Thomas & Sartori, 1992) from the Moroccan High Atlas (Thomas and Gagneur 1994; Abdaoui et al. 2010; Zuedzang Abessolo et al. 2021), A. sadati Thomas, 1994 distributed from West Algeria to North Tunisia (Thomas and Gagneur 1994; Zrelli et al. 2012; Benhadji et al. 2020), A. navasi (Müller-Liebenau, 1974) located in the Iberian Peninsula (Müller-Liebenau 1974; Alba-Tercedor 1981, 1982; Puig 1983), A. kars (Thomas & Kazanci, 1989) found in Turkey (Kazanci and Thomas 1989; Novikova and Kluge 1994; Kazanci 2001; Kluge and Novikova 2014) and Armenia (Hrivniak et al. 2018; Sroka et al. 2021), A. albinatii (Sartori & Thomas 1989) mentioned from Corsica (Sartori and Thomas 1989; Gattolliat et al. 2015; Tenchini et al. 2018), A. bengunn Yanai & Gattolliat, 2022 recorded from the sister island of Sardinia (Yanai et al. 2022), and A. gasithi Yanai & Gattolliat, 2022 found recently in Israel (Yanai et al. 2022).

The distinctive taxonomical characters of this genus at the nymphal stage were mentioned by Zrelli et al. (2012) and Sroka et al. (2021) and include a laterally compressed body, closely positioned antennae, an apical prolongation on the paraproct, and a reduced mandibular right prostheca (Müller-Liebenau 1969, 1974; Waltz et al. 1994; Fujitani et al. 2003). West Palearctic species are characterized by the presence of six pairs of gills, except for A. muticus, which has seven. Some larvae of Alainites discovered in the material collected from northern Morocco were different from the Moroccan endemic A. oukaimeden and from A. muticus. It represents the second West Palearctic species with seven pairs of gills. The specimens of this species were previously considered to belong to A. muticus (Dakki 1987; El Bazi et al. 2017; Khadri et al. 2017; Mabrouki et al. 2017; El Alami et al. 2022b). However, detailed morphological and genetic approaches proved that these specimens of Alainites noticeably differed from both the European and Asiatic lineages (Sroka 2012).

In the present study, we describe a new species of Alainites based on nymphs from the Rifean Mountains of Morocco. In addition, distinctive characters of western Palearctic Alainites species are provided. The holotype and part of the paratypes of the new species are housed in the Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Switzerland (MZL); other paratypes are deposited in Laboratory of Ecology, Systematics, Conservation of Biodiversity Tetouan, Morocco (LESCB).

Materials and methods

The larvae of Alainites albai sp. nov. has a wide distribution and a wide altitudinal range in the Rif (Fig. 1). The sampling was performed by LESCB team between 1997 and 2022. They were subsequently preserved in 70% or 95% ethanol for description and DNA extraction. Nymphal dissection was performed in Cellosolve or in 10% KOH, and specimens were mounted on slides with Euparal medium, or the dissected parts of the nymphs were mounted directly in Hoyer’s liquid (Alba-Tercedor 1988), using an Olympus SZM100 stereomicroscope.

Figure 1. 

The sampling site localization of Alainites albai sp. nov., in the Rif domain.

To complement our morphological investigations, we sequenced a 658 bp fragment of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI hereafter) for seven specimens of Alainites albai sp. nov., following the non-destructive DNA extraction procedure described in Vuataz et al. 2011. The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), purification and sequencing steps were conducted according to the methodology described in El Alami et al 2022a. Forward and reverse sequencing reads were assembled and edited in CodonCode Aligner v. 10.0.2 (Codon-Code Corporation, Dedham, MA), and aligned using MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2019) with default settings as implemented in Jalview v. 2.11.2.6 (Waterhouse et al. 2009). The number of parsimony-informative sites of the alignment was calculated in Mega v. 10.2.4 (Kumar et al. 2018; Stecher et al. 2020).

To augment our molecular dataset, we initially downloaded all COI sequences associated with Alainites available on the GenBank database (identified among species of the genus Takobia Novikova & Kluge, 1987) as of 2 June 2023, resulting in a total of 64 records. Additionally, we obtained the sequences associated with Alainites/Takobia accessible on the BOLDSYSTEMS data portal as of the same date and selectively retained only those that were not shared with GenBank, yielding an additional set of 5 sequences. We then manually excluded GenBank/BOLD sequences obtained from specimens collected outside the western Palearctic region. This selection process was conducted after confirming that the COI sequences of Alainites albai sp. nov. were clearly distinct from the removed sequences (data not shown). A total of 58 sequences remained for further analyses, comprising seven newly generated sequences (Table 1), 46 sequences from GenBank (four from Kjærstad et al. 2012; six from Sroka 2012; two from Cardoni et al. 2015; ten from Gattolliat et al. 2015; one from Corse et al. 2017; seven from Morinière et al. 2017; five from Tenchini et al. 2018; one from Behrens-Chapuis et al. 2021; two from Sroka et al. 2021; two from Roslin et al. 2022; five from Yanai et al 2022; one unpublished iBOL data release) and five from BOLD (DTNHM1449-21, TDAAT323-19, VMCOL019-20VMCOL021-20). Two additional newly sequenced specimens, namely one Nigrobaetis numidicus (Soldán & Thomas, 1983) from Morocco and one Nigrobaetis rhithralis (Soldán & Thomas, 1983) from Algeria, were included in the study as outgroups (Table 1).

Table 1.

Newly sequenced specimens for the study, with collection information, GenBank accessions and nomenclature details.

Specimen catalogue Species Country Stage Locality GPS coordinates Date GenBank ID GenSeq nomenclature
GBIFCH00980877 Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco Nymph Oued Kelâa 35.242222°N, 5.169444°W 3.iii.2021 OR126003 genseq-2 COI
GBIFCH01144254 Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco Nymph Oued Tisgris 35.367222°N, -5.533889°W 20.iv.2021 OR126002 genseq-2 COI
GBIFCH01144390 Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco Nymph Oued Ouara 35.035039°N, -5.237778°W 23.vi.2022 OR126001 genseq-2 COI
GBIFCH01144391 Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco Nymph Oued Afeska 35.169733°N, -5.185083°W 2. vi.2020 OR126000 genseq-2 COI
GBIFCH01144392 Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco Nymph Oued Amazithen 35.29924°N, -4.90937°W 27.ii.2021 OR125999 genseq-2 COI
GBIFCH01144393 Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco Nymph Oued Ouara 35.043567°N, -5.2336°W 23.vi.2022 OR125998 genseq-2 COI
GBIFCH01144394 Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco Nymph Oued Sidi Yahia Aarab 35.287056°N, -4.90185°W 28.v.2022 OR125997 genseq-2 COI
GBIFCH00673223 Nigrobaetis rhithralis Algeria Nymph Oued Ftitich 36.900278°N, 8.618056°W 9.iii.2019 OR126004 genseq-4 COI
GBIFCH01144576 Nigrobaetis numidicus Morocco Nymph Oued Brahim Ben Arrif 35.306111°N, -5.615833°W 21.vi.2013 OR125996 genseq-4 COI

To explore and visualize the COI evolutionary divergence, we employed pairwise genetic distances and gene tree approaches. COI pairwise distances were calculated using the dist.dna function from the ape 5.7-1 package (Paradis and Schliep 2019) in R 4.3.0 (R Core Team 2023), selecting the raw model and the pairwise.deletion option, corresponding to uncorrected p-distances (see Srivathsan and Meier 2012) with missing data removed in a pairwise way. Mean, minimum, and maximum distances within and between putative COI species, referred to as Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) hereafter, were calculated using the ddply function from the plyr 1.8.8 package (Wickham 2011). The assignment of COI sequences to MOTUs was determined based on the results of the species delimitation analyses (as described below). Prior to reconstructing the COI gene tree, the best evolutionary model (HKY+Γ+I) was selected based on the second-order Akaike information criterion (AICc; Hurvich and Tsai 1989) implemented in JmodelTest v. 2.1.10 (Darriba et al. 2012) with three substitution schemes, six gamma categories and default values for other parameters. To account for different substitution rates among COI codon positions, we analyzed our data set in two partitions, one with first and second codon positions, and the other with third positions (1 + 2, 3). Bayesian inference analysis was performed using BEAST v. 1.10.4 (Suchard et al. 2018) on the CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3 (Miller et al. 2010). The input BEAST file was generated in BEAUTi v. 1.10.4 (Suchard et al. 2018), incorporating the selected evolutionary model and partition scheme described above and enforcing a monophyletic constraint on the ingroup (the genus Alainites). A relaxed molecular clock model (uncorrelated lognormal) and a UPGMA starting tree were used, with default settings for other parameters. Two independent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analyses were run for 60 million generations, logging parameters every 1000 generations. Convergence of the MCMC runs was visually verified in Tracer v. 1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018). The log and tree files from the independent runs were combined using LogCombiner v. 1.10.4 (Suchard et al. 2018), after discarding the initial 10% of trees as burn-in, ensuring that all parameters reached effective sample size values > 200. The maximum clade credibility tree was obtained using TreeAnnotator v. 1.10.4 (Suchard et al. 2018) with default settings. Visualization and editing of the tree were conducted in iTOL v. 6.7.5 (Letunic and Bork 2021).

Finally, we applied three contrasting single-locus species delimitation methods to our COI dataset: the distance-based ASAP (Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning; Puillandre et al. 2020), and the tree-based GMYC (General Mixed Yule-Coalescent; Pons et al. 2006; Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013) and mPTP (multi-rate Poisson Tree Processes; Kapli et al. 2017) approaches. ASAP, an improved version of the ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery; Puillandre et al. (2012) approach, was employed using the ASAP webserver (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/asapweb.html) to estimate the most probable number of MOTUs based on our COI alignment. We calculated genetic distances using the Kimura 2-parameter substitution model (Kimura 1980) and selected the species delimitation hypothesis associated to the highest barcode gap width (W) among the two partitions sharing the same best asap-score. The GMYC model, which requires a time-calibrated ultrametric tree as input, implements a maximum likelihood approach that defines a threshold separating the branches modelled under speciation events (Yule process) from those described by allele neutral coalescence. The ultrametric tree used as input for GMYC analysis was generated in BEAST, following the same procedure described earlier. However, a reduced dataset was utilized, in which outgroups were excluded and haplotypes were pruned (see Talavera et al. 2013) using Collapsetypes v. 4.6 (Chesters 2013). MCMC chains were run here for a total of 20 million generations. GMYC was run in R using the SPLITS package 1.0-20 (Ezard et al. 2009). We favored the single-threshold version of the GMYC model because it was shown to outperform the multiple-threshold version (Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013). The mPTP approach, an extension of the PTP method by Zhang et al. (2013), also exploits phylogenetic differences within and between species, but with the advantage of directly using the number of substitutions from a phylogenetic tree, eliminating the need for time calibration. We conducted mPTP using the web service available at https://mptp.h-its.org, using the BEAST COI gene trees (full dataset) as input (see above).

Abbreviations

MZL Muséum Cantonal des Sciences Naturelles, Lausanne (Switzerland);

LESCB Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Systématique et Conservation de la Biodiversité (Morocco).

Results

Alainites albai El Alami, Vuataz & Gattolliat, sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Type-material

Holotype. Morocco. Nymph; Chefchaouen Province, S10 Oued Kelâa; Loc. Akchour; 35°14'32"N, 05°10'10"W; alt. 460 m; 3.iii.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; GBIFCH00763782; MZL.

Paratypes. Morocco. 1 nymph; same data as holotype; DNA; GBIFCH00980877; MZL • 2 nymphs; same data as holotype; 7.xi.2014; El Bazi leg.; in alcohol; LESCB • 1 nymph; Chefchaouen Province, S1 Oued Amazithen, Loc. El Ouesteyine; 35°17'57.264"N, 4°54'33.732"W; alt. 166 m; 27.ii.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; DNA; GBIFCH01144392; MZL • 2 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S2 Oued Sidi Yahia Aarab, Loc. Sidi Yahia Aarab; 35°17'10.428"N, 4°53'37.644"W; alt. 114 m; 28.v.2022; El Yaagoubi leg.; one in alcohol; GBIFCH00763784 and other DNA; GBIFCH01144394; MZL; 1 nymph; 18.vi.2014; Khadri leg.; in Alcohol; GBIFCH00763781; MZL; 4 nymphs; 28/v/2022; El Yaagoubi leg.; LESCB • 6 nymphs ; Chefchaouen Province, S3 Oued Jenane Niche, Loc. Jenane Niche ; 35°16'44.904"N, 4°51'40.788"W ; alt. 93 m; 9.ix.2021 ; El Yaagoubi leg.; LESCB • 11 nymphs; Chefchaouen, Province, S4 Oued Aârkob, Loc. Arherarose; 35°15'59.4"N, 4°50'33.216"W; alt. 128 m; 9.xii.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; in alcohol; LESCB • 22 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S5 Oued Assifane, Loc. Igourain; 35°7'6.7584"N, 4°59'3.9984"W; alt. 1405 m; 9.ix.2021; El Yaagoubi leg ; 1 on slide ; LESCB • 5 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S6 Oued Beni Mhammed, Loc. Beni Mhammed; 35°09'34.0812"N, 5°07'34.0212"W; alt. 1330 m; 29.v.2008; El Alami leg.; in alcohol; GBIFCH00763777; MZL • 2 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S7 Oued Afeska, Loc. Afeska; 35°10'11.0388"N, 5°13'6.2988"W; alt. 1293 m; 2.vi.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; 1 nymph DNA; GBIFCH01144391; 2.vi.2020;2 in alcohol; GBIFCH00763777; GBIFCH00763783; MZL and 4 nymphs; 2.vi.2022; El Yaagoubi leg.; 3 in alcohol and 1 on slide; LESCB • 10 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S8 Oued Maggo, Loc. Maggo Nord village; 35°6'48.6"N, 5°11'26.7"W; alt. 905 m; 24.ii.2022; El Yaagoubi leg.; LESCB; 5 nymphs; 3.vi.2016; El Alami, leg.; in alcohol; GBIFCH00763780; MZL • 4 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S9 Oued Ouara, Loc. Khizana; 35°02'614"N, 5°14'016"W; alt. 930 m; 23.vi.2022; El Yaagoubi leg.; 2 on slide; LESCB; 2 for DNA; GBIFCH01144393; GBIFCH01144390; MZL • 3 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S11 Oued Laou, Loc. Abiyati; 35°17'55.14"N, 5°13'59.99"W; alt. 140 m; 11.iii.2001; El Alami leg.; in alcohol; GBIFCH00763779; MZL • 1 nymph; Chefchaouen Province, S12 Oued Harakat, Loc. Mezine village; 35°6'8"N, 5°20'46"W; alt. 740 m; 31.iii.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; DNA, GBIFCH00980924; MZL • 20 nymphs; Chefchaouen Province, S13 Oued Mansoura, Loc. Tanaqoub; 35°5'16"N, 5°30'37"W; alt. 124 m; 01.vi.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; 2 on slide; LESCB • 2 nymphs; Ouezzane Province, S14 Oued Loukkos, Loc. Souk El Had; 35°01'21"N, 5°25'14"W; alt. 140 m; 11.iv.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; in alcohol; GBIFCH00763776; MZL • 1 nymph; Tetouan Province, S15 Oued Tisgris, Loc. Hammadesh; 35°22'02"N, 5°32'02"W; alt. 505 m; 20.iv.2021; El Yaagoubi leg.; DNA; GBIFCH01144254; MZL • 10 nymphs; Tetouan Province, S16 Oued Rmel, Loc. Ain Dchicha; 35°52'40"N, 5°28'24"W; alt. 49 m; 20.x.1997; El Alami leg.; in alcohol; LESCB and 2 nymphs in alcohol; GBIFCH00763778; MZL.

Differential diagnosis

Alainites albai sp. nov. can be distinguished from other West Palaearctic species of Alainites based on the combination of nymphal characters, summarized in Table 2: (a) seven pairs of abdominal gills, (b) paraproct prolongation covered with small spines on its entire surface with broad, triangular spines laterally, (c) small teeth between prostheca and mola on both mandibles, (d) low number of dorsal setae on its fore-femora (10–15).

Table 2.

Distinctive taxonomic criteria and distribution of West Palaearctic Alainites species.

Species Distribution Number of gill pairs Right mandible: margin between prostheca and mola Mandible lateral side Fore-femur dorsal margin: setae number Fore-tibia dorsal margin: setae number Cuticle abdominal terga and sterna Tergite IV: spines on distal margin Prolongation of paraproct
Alainites albai sp. nov. Morocco 7 10–16 small teeth shagreened with scattered fine setae and deep scale bases 10–15 6–10 strongly shagreened long triangular, pointed covered by spines
Alainites albinatii (Sartori & Thomas, 1989) Corsica 6 ~ 10 small teeth scale bases shagreened 15 6 slightly shagreened long triangular, pointed apically covered by spines
Alainites bengunn Yanai & Gattolliat, 2022 Sardinia 6 serrated scale bases, slightly shagreened 14–20 9–17 shagreened slightly lanceolate covered by spines
Alainites gasithi Yanai & Gattolliat, 2022 Israel 6 serrated no scale bases, almost not shagreened 10–20 ~ 6 rarely 10–12 smooth long triangular, pointed spines only on border
Alainites kars (Thomas & Kazanci, 1989) Turkey 6 teeth absent no scale bases, almost not shagreened > 40 in two rows 5–9 slightly shagreened triangular pointed spines on entire surface or just on apex
Alainites muticus (Linnaeus, 1758) Palaearctic 7 ~ 10 small teeth rare scale bases 14 8 slightly shagreened short triangular broad basally spines only on border
Alainites navasi (Müller-Liebenau, 1974) Iberian Peninsula 6 ~ 10 small teeth ? 26 21 smooth short triangular covered by spines
Alainites oukaimeden (Thomas & Sartori, 1992) Morocco (High Atlas) 6 ~ 10 small teeth shagreened 20 8 strongly shagreened long, relatively narrow covered by spines
Alainites sadati Thomas, 1994 Algeria, Tunisia 6 ~ 10 small teeth no scale bases, almost not shagreened ~ 25 6–9 slightly shagreened medium triangular covered by spines

Morphological description

Nymph. Length. Female body 6.0–7.9 mm; cerci 4.5–5.5 mm; median caudal filament 1.3–1.4 mm (ca 2/3 of cerci); Male body 6.0–6.7 mm; cerci 4.0–5.0 mm; median caudal filament ca 2/3 of cerci.

Coloration

General coloration pale to medium brown (Figs 2, 3). Head uniformly pale brown to brown with yellow vermiform marks on vertex and frons (Fig. 3a). Turbinate eyes in male nymph’s purple-brown. Legs ecru except upper side of femora brown (Fig. 2b). Thorax with some paler clear pattern (Fig. 3c). Abdominal tergites pale brown with a central, elongated, yellowish dot; distal part of tergite IX and whole tergite X pale brown to yellowish. Abdominal sternites yellowish to pale brown. Cerci ecru to pale brown without bands or pattern.

Figure 2. 

Alainites albai sp. nov., nymph habitus a female, dorsal view b female lateral view c male, dorsal view d lateral view of the first three gills.

Figure 3. 

Alainites albai sp. nov., nymph morphology a head frontal view b scape and pedicel c pronotum d labrum.

Head. Antennae (Fig. 3a) close to each other, with a narrow inter-antennal carina, scape with deep scale insertions, pedicel with deep scale insertions and few setae (Fig. 3b).

Dorsal surface of labrum (Fig. 3d) with one central long seta and distolateral arc of two long, simple, stout setae, and small fine setae scattered on surface; ventral surface with 5–8 submarginal small, pointed setae; distal margin fringed with ca 20 short, followed by eight or ten long, feathered setae.

Right mandible (Fig. 4a) shagreened, with scattered fine setae and deep scale insertions; incisors composed of eight blunt, distinct denticles, outer- and inner denticles notably smaller than others; prostheca reduced and bifid with numerous thin setae; 10–16 teeth in the space between prostheca and mola (Fig. 4b), tuft of setae absent.

Figure 4. 

Alainites albai sp. nov., nymph morphology a right mandible b spines between mola and prostheca bifid c left mandible d spines between mola and prostheca.

Left mandible (Fig. 4c) slightly shagreened, with sparse fine setae and deep scale insertions; incisors composed of seven blunt, distinct denticles, outer denticle conspicuously smaller than others; prostheca with one row of 11–15 medium denticles and a comb-like structure (Fig. 4d); edge between prostheca and mola with sparse spines particularly in apical half, without setae.

Hypopharynx (Fig. 5a) trilobed, apically covered with thin setae; lingua with small central protuberance; superlingua longer than lingua.

Maxilla (Fig. 5b) apex with three elongated acute and curved teeth and a toothlike dentisetae; crown with one row of small setae ending with stouter and longer ones (Fig. 5c); palp two-segmented, extending behind apex of galea-lacinia, length of segment I approximately 0.65× segment II; segment II apically rounded, with few thin setae.

Figure 5. 

Alainites albai sp. nov., nymph morphology a hypopharynx b maxilla c details of dentisetae and maxilla crown of setae d labium.

Labium (Fig. 5d) with glossae slightly shorter than paraglossae; inner margins of glossae with 7 or 9 stout medium setae, apical margin with ca 5–7 long stout setae, ventral surface with few thin scattered setae; dorsal surface with row of ca 6–9 medium setae; paraglossae of constant width, with three rows of 11 or 14 long, stout and feathery setae apically; labial palp three-segmented; segment I 0.8× length of segments II and III combined; segment II with dorsal oblique row of 4–6 medium setae; segment III conical, nearly symmetrical, slightly pointed apically, covered with few medium stout setae and small pointed setae apically.

Thorax. Forelegs (Fig. 6): Trochanter with seven marginal short stout pointed setae; femur dorsal margin with one regular row of 10–15 long, robust setae, and two subapical stout and long setae; ventral margin with short stout pointed setae; lateral surface with sparse scale bases, mainly on apical half and along subdorsal area (Fig. 6a). Tibiae (Fig. 6b) dorsally with 6–10 short stout pointed setae and single apical seta; ventrally with marginal and submarginal short stout pointed setae, denser towards apical end; tibiopatellar suture absent; lateral surface with few short, stout, pointed setae and numerous scale bases. Tarsi bares dorsally; ventral margin with ca 15–24 pointed medium setae; lateral surface with numerous scale bases. Tarsal claws (Fig. 6c) hooked with one row of 11–13 medium teeth, apical setae absent (Fig. 6d). Mid and hindlegs similar to forelegs except femora dorsally with 13–17 pointed setae and tibiae with 21–24 setae dorsally.

Figure 6. 

Alainites albai sp. nov., nymph morphology a foreleg femur b foreleg tibia c foreleg tarsal claw, foreleg claw.

Hindwing. Pads present.

Abdomen. Terga (Fig. 7a) shagreened, with numerous scale bases, distal margin of tergite IV with triangular spines ~ 2× longer than broad. Sternites with scale bases; posterior margin smooth without spination.

Figure 7. 

Alainites albai sp. nov., nymph morphology a distal margin of tergum IV b gill IV c gill V d left paraproct e right paraproct.

Gills (Fig. 2d) on segments I–VII, elliptic, almost symmetrical and serrated all along costal and distal margins except proximal part and with few setae, gill I smaller than others, length of gill I longer than half of tergite II; gill IV (Fig. 7b) and gill V larger than others, (Fig. 7c). Surface with pores and without any setae; tracheation well visible but with reduced ramification. Paraproct (Fig. 7d, e) shagreened with scale bases and setae; margin with seven broad, triangular spines inner to prolongation and numerous medium spines outer to prolongation; lateral margins of prolongation with numerous medium to broad spines, surface covered with spines; cercotractor with scattered scale bases, distal margin with ca 20 medium spines.

Imago. Unknown.

Molecular analysis

The COI data set was > 95% complete and included 35% of parsimony informative sites. Pairwise COI distances across all sequences ranged from 0% to 23.4%. The overall mean p-distance within MOTUs was 0.8% (mean range: 0.1%–2.3%), while the overall mean p-distance between MOTUs was 18.7% (mean range: 14.9%–22.6%). The maximum p-distance within MOTUs varied from 0.2% (A. gasithi and A. kars) to 2.8% (A. sp. 2). The minimum p-distance between MOTUs ranged from 14.3% (A. sp. 1–A. sp. 2) to 16.7% (A. karsA. gasithi and A. karsA. sp. 4). The seven sequences from A. albai sp. nov. formed a strongly supported monophyletic clade, identified as a distinct MOTU in the three species delimitation analyses (Fig. 8). All methods were fully congruent in delimitating the other MOTUs as well.

Figure 8. 

Bayesian (BEAST) maximum clade credibility COI tree of the genus Alainites in the West Palearctic: branch ends labelled with GBIF codes in bold indicate newly sequenced specimens; the DTNHM1449-21, TDAAT323-19, and VMCOL019-20VMCOL021-20 codes are from BOLD; the other codes correspond to sequences obtained from GenBank. Colored vertical boxes indicate species delimitation hypothesis according to the ASAP, mPTP, and GMYC methods. For each MOTU, the corresponding species names (where available) and the country/region of origin is provided, with the newly described species and associated GBIF codes specified in bold. Circles on branches indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.9. Outgroup branches, labels, and species names are presented in grey.

Distribution

(Fig. 1). Morocco.

Etymology

The first author dedicates the name of this species to her former mentor, Professor Javier Alba-Tercedor, a specialist in the Ephemeroptera of the Iberian Peninsula. He contributed significantly to her training and specialization in the taxonomic study of the Ephemeroptera of Morocco.

Discussion

Morphology and genetic characteristics

The integrative approach, incorporating molecular, morphological, and biogeographic evidence, enabled a robust species delimitation within Alainites. Indeed, the molecular analyses not only support the monophyly of Alainites albai sp. nov. (Fig. 8), but also reveal an important genetic distance to all other included Alainites species. The minimum p-distance to the other MOTUs ranges from 16% to 20%, thereby solidifying A. albai sp. nov. as a distinct and valid new species. The findings from our molecular analyses also underline the need for further taxonomic research on Alainites, particularly in Europe.

The number of gills is a useful character to separate the different species of Alainites. This new species is assigned to Alainites because it has all the synapomorphic characters of the genus: a laterally compressed thorax, paraproct with postero-internal extension and the prostheca of the right mandible bifid (Waltz et al. 1994; Gattolliat et al. 2023). Within Alainites, the larva of the new species is the second western Palearctic species with seven pairs of gills. It differs from A. muticus by the size of the spines between prostheca and mola of the right mandible, by the reticulation degree of paraprocts, tergites and mandibles, by the spination of the paraproct extension surface and the presence of strong spines between the prolongation and the extension of the paraproct. Alainites albai sp. nov. can be easily separated from the other western Palearctic species (A. albinatii, A. bengunn, A. gasithi, A. navasi, A. kars), as well as the Maghreb endemic species (A. oukaimeden and A. sadati) by the number of pairs of gills (Table 2).

Hence, the discovery of this new species has increased the diversity of described Alainites species with seven pairs of gills to a total of six, with two found in the West Palaearctic and four in the Oriental realms. The latter are A. siamensis Phlai-ngam, Tungpairojwong & Gattolliat, 2022 from Thailand (Phlai-ngam et al. 2022), A. lingulatus Tong & Dudgeon, 2000 from Hong Kong (Tong and Dudgeon 2000), A. yixiani Gui & Lu, 1999 from the Chinese mainland (Gui and Lu 1999; Sroka et al. 2021; Phlai-ngam et al. 2022), and A. clivosus Chang & Yang, 1994 from Taiwan (Kang et al. 1994; Waltz et al. 1994; Kluge and Novikova 2014; Sroka et al. 2021).

Ecology

Alainites albai sp. nov. was first mentioned in the Rif and Middle Atlas by Dakki and El Agbani (1983) under the name Baetis muticus. This new species is confined preferentially to streams of northern Morocco, since it appears to be absent from the High Atlas (Bouzidi 1989; El Alami et al. 2022b), where it is replaced by its congener A. oukaimeden. Its absence in eastern Morocco (Berrahou et al. 2001; Mabrouki et al. 2019) and the Central Plateau (El Agbani et al. 1992) is probably related to excessive water heating.

In addition to the wide horizontal distribution of this species in northern Morocco, it has a fairly wide altitudinal distribution (5–1600 m) covering the three bioclimatic stages, the thermos-, meso-, and supra-Mediterranean. In fact, it shows a preference for the streams along the Mediterranean coastline with a semi-arid climate over regions with a sub-humid to humid climate. In certain mountainous regions it can thrive in conditions considered as perhumid. In the Rif, this species likes biotopes with a stony bottom rich in sand and submerged vegetation. In addition, it prefers the relatively cold waters of the upper and middle courses of wadis in which it reaches its ecological optimum during the summer period. In the Middle Atlas, its distribution is more restricted, as it has only been collected in two wadis at altitudes varying between 760 and 1500 m (Dakki 1987). However, recent surveys have shown the species to now be absent from these stations (Zerrouk et al. 2021).

Conclusions

The discovery of A. albai sp. nov. has increased the biodiversity of Morocco with a new endemic species of mayfly, highlighting the remarkable biodiversity and species richness of Ephemeroptera in the region. The recent identification of two new species, Prosopistoma maroccanum (El Alami et al., 2022a) and Centroptilum alamiae (Gattolliat et al., 2023), has significantly increased the proportion of Ephemeroptera endemism in Morocco to more than 33% (El Alami et al. 2022b). With the potential for further increases in the future, it is crucial to prioritize conservation and protection measures, particularly in sites hosting high species richness and endemic species.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Boudjéma Samraoui for providing us with the Nigrobaetis rhithralis specimen he collected in Algeria.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: MEA. Investigation: SEY. Methodology: LV, SEY. Supervision: MEA, JLG. Writing – original draft: MEA. Writing – review and editing: LV, JLG.

Author ORCIDs

Majida El Alami https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2664-646X

Laurent Vuataz https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-8683

Sara El Yaagoubi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1860-6433

Jean-Luc Gattolliat https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-5083

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Abdaoui A, El Alami El Moutaouakil M, Ghamizi M (2010) Diversité et distribution des Baetidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera) du Parc National de Toubkal (Haut Atlas, Maroc). Travaux de l’Institut Scientifique. Série Zoologie 47: 1–5.
  • Alba-Tercedor J (1981) Recopilación de citas de Efemerópteros en la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Trabajos y Mongrafias del Departamento de Zoologia (N.S. ) 4: 41–81.
  • Alba-Tercedor J (1982) Descripcion de la ninfa de una nueva subespecie de Efemerópteros: Baetis muticus intermedius – Recherche Google. Eos (Washington, D.C.) LVIII: 9–16.
  • Alba-Tercedor J (1988) Ephemeroptera. Bases para un curso práctico de Entomología. Barrientos, J.A. (coord.). Asociación Española de Entomología 6: 359–372.
  • Bauernfeind E, Soldán T (2012) The Mayflies of Europe (Ephemeroptera). Apollo Books, Ollerup, 781 pp.
  • Behrens-Chapuis S, Herder F, Geiger MF (2021) Adding DNA barcoding to stream monitoring protocols – What’s the additional value and congruence between morphological and molecular identification approaches? PLoS ONE 16(1): e0244598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244598
  • Benhadji N, Sartori M, Abdellaoui Hassaine K, Gattolliat J-L (2020) Reports of Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) species from Tafna Basin, Algeria and biogeographic affinities revealed by DNA barcoding. Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e55596. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e55596
  • Berrahou A, Cellot B, Richoux P (2001) Distribution longitudinale des macroinvertébrés benthiques de la Moulouya et de ses principaux affluents (Maroc). Annales de Limnologie 37(3): 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2001020
  • Bojková J, Sroka P, Soldán T, Namin JI, Staniczek AH, Polášek M, Hrivniak Ľ, Abdoli A, Godunko RJ (2018) Initial commented checklist of Iranian mayflies, with new area records and description of Procloeon caspicum sp. n. (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). ZooKeys 749: 87–123. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.749.24104
  • Bouzidi A (1989) Recherches hydrobiologiques sur les cours d’eau des massifs du Haut Atlas (Maroc). Bio-écologie des macroinvertébrés et distribution spatiale des peuplements. Thèse d’Etat. Université Cadi Ayyad, 189 pp.
  • Cardoni S, Tenchini R, Ficulle I, Piredda R, Simeone M, Belfiore C (2015) DNA barcode assessment of Mediterranean mayflies (Ephemeroptera), benchmark data for a regional reference library for rapid biomonitoring of freshwaters. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 62: 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2015.07.035
  • Corse E, Meglécz E, Archambaud G, Ardisson M, Martin J-F, Tougard C, Chappaz R, Dubut V (2017) A from-benchtop-to-desktop workflow for validating HTS data and for taxonomic identification in diet metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 17(6): e146–e159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12703
  • Dakki M (1987) Ecosystème d’eau courante du haut Sebou (Moyen Atlas); Etudes typologiques et analyses écologiques et biogéographie des principaux peuplements entomologiques. Travaux de l’Institut Scientifique 42: 1–99.
  • Dakki M, El Agbani M-A (1983) Ephéméroptères d’Afrique du Nord: 3. Eléments pour la connaissance de la faune marocaine. Bulletin de l’Institut Scientifique, Rabat 7: 115–126.
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): e772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • El Agbani MA, Dakki M, Bournaud M (1992) Etude typologique du Bou Regreg (Maroc) : Les milieux aquatiques et leurs peuplements en macroinvertébrés. Bulletin d’écologie 23: 103–113.
  • El Alami M, Benlasri M, Sartori M, Vuataz L, Ghamizi M (2022a) A new species of the genus Prosopistoma Latreille, 1833 (Ephemeroptera, Prosopistomatidae) from Morocco. ZooKeys 1117: 203–218. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1117.83539
  • El Alami M, El Yaagoubi S, Gattolliat J-L, Sartori M, Dakki M (2022b) Diversity and Distribution of Mayflies from Morocco (Ephemeroptera, Insecta). Diversity 14(6): e498. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14060498
  • El Bazi R, El Alami M, Khadri O, Errochdi S, Slimani M, Bennas N (2017) Projet du parc naturel de Bouhachem (Nord-Ouest du Maroc) II: Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera. Boletin de la SEA 61: 55–66. [SEA]
  • Ezard T, Fujisawa T, Barraclough T (2009) splits: Species’ Limits by Threshold Statistics version 1.0-20 from R-Forge. https://rdrr.io/rforge/splits/ [Accessed 8 June 2023]
  • Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: A revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Systematic Biology 62(5): 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033
  • Fujitani T, Hirowatari T, Tanida K (2003) Genera and species of Baetidae in Japan: Nigrobaetis, Alainites, Labiobaetis, and Tenuibaetis n. stat. (Ephemeroptera). Limnology 4(3): 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-003-0105-2
  • Gattolliat J-L, Cavallo E, Vuataz L, Sartori M (2015) DNA barcoding of Corsican mayflies (Ephemeroptera) with implications on biogeography, systematics and biodiversity. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 73(1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3897/asp.73.e31813
  • Gattolliat J-L, Samraoui B, Benhadji N, Kechemir L, Zrelli S, Yaagoubi SE, El Moutaouakil MEA, Sartori M (2023) Baetidae (Baetidae, Ephemeroptera) in the Maghreb: State of the art, key, and perspectives. ZooKeys 1139: 137–163. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1139.94586
  • Gui H, Lu L (1999) A new species of the genus Baetis from China (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Acta Entomologica Sinica 42: 297–299.
  • Hrivniak Ľ, Sroka P, Godunko RJ, Palatov D, Polášek M, Manko P, Oboňa J (2018) Diversity of Armenian mayflies (Ephemeroptera) with the description of a new species of the genus Ecdyonurus (Heptageniidae). Zootaxa 4500(2): 195–221. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4500.2.3
  • Kaltenbach T, Gattolliat J-L (2021) Labiobaetis Novikova & Kluge in West Africa (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae), with description of a new species. African Invertebrates 62(1): 355–382. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.62.64885
  • Kang S-C, Chang H-C, Chang C-T (1994) A revision of the genus Baetis in Taiwan (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Journal of Taiwan Museum 47: 9–44.
  • Kapli P, Lutteropp S, Zhang J, Kobert K, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A, Flouri T (2017) Multi-rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics 33(11): 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
  • Kazanci N, Thomas A (1989) Compléments et corrections à la fauna des Ephéméroptères du Proche-Orient: 2. Baetis kars n. sp. de Turquie (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse: 323–327.
  • Kazancı N (2001) Gümüşhane, Erzurum, Erzincan, Artvin, Kars İlleri Ephemeroptera (Insecta) Faunasına İlişkin Ön Çalışma. Türkiye İç Suları Araştırmaları Dizisi: V. İmaj Yayınevi, Ankara 80.
  • Khadri O, El Alami M, El Bazi R, Slimani M (2017) Ephemeroptera’s diversity and ecology in streams of the ultramafic massif of Beni Bousera and in the adjacent non-ultramafic sites (NW, Morocco). Journal of Materials & Environmental Sciences 8: 3508–3523.
  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  • Kjærstad G, Webb J, Ekrem T (2012) A review of the Ephemeroptera of Finnmark-DNA barcodes identify Holarctic relations. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 59: 182–195.
  • Kluge N, Novikova E (2014) Systematics of Indobaetis Müller-Liebenau & Morihara 1982, and related implications for some other Baetidae genera (Ephemeroptera). Zootaxa 3835(2): 209–236. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3835.2.3
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • Letunic I, Bork P (2021) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v. 5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 49(W1): W293–W296. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab301
  • Mabrouki Y, Taybi AF, El Alami M, Berrahou A (2017) New and interesting data on distribution and ecology of Mayflies from Eastern Morocco (Ephemeroptera). Journal of Materials & Environmental Sciences 8: 2839–2859.
  • Mabrouki Y, Taybi AF, El Alami M, Berrahou A (2019) Biotypology of stream macroinvertebrates from North African and semi-arid catchment: Oued Za (Morocco). Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 17(420): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2019009
  • Miller M, Pfeiffer WT, Schwartz T (2010) 14 Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop: 14 Nov 2010 Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees, 1 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Morinière J, Hendrich L, Balke M, Beermann AJ, König T, Hess M, Koch S, Müller R, Leese F, Hebert PDN, Hausmann A, Schubart CD, Haszprunar G (2017) A DNA barcode library for Germany’s mayflies, stoneflies and caddisflies (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera). Molecular Ecology Resources 17(6): 1293–1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12683
  • Müller-Liebenau I (1969) Revision der europäischen Arten der Gattung Baetis Leach, 1815 (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Gewässer und Abwässer 48/49: 1–214.
  • Müller-Liebenau I (1974) Baetidae aus Südfrankreich, Spanien und Portugal (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). Gewässer und Abwässer 53/54: 7–42.
  • Novikova E, Kluge N (1994) Mayflies of the subgenus Nigrobaetis (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae, Baetis). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 623–644.
  • Phlai-ngam S, Tungpairojwong N, Gattolliat J-L (2022) A new species of Alainites (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae) from Thailand. Alpine Entomology 6: 133–146. https://doi.org/10.3897/alpento.6.96284
  • Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, Hazell S, Kamoun S, Sumlin WD, Vogler AP (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Systematic Biology 55(4): 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600852011
  • Puig M (1983) Distribució de “Baetis muticus” (s. st.) i “Baetis muticus intermedius” “(Ephemeroptera: Baetidae)” a Catalunya. Butlletí de la Institució Catalana d’Història Natural (Sec. Zool., 5): 153–154.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Roslin T, Somervuo P, Pentinsaari M, Hebert PDN, Agda J, Ahlroth P, Anttonen P, Aspi J, Blagoev G, Blanco S, Chan D, Clayhills T, deWaard J, deWaard S, Elliot T, Elo R, Haapala S, Helve E, Ilmonen J, Hirvonen P, Ho C, Itämies J, Ivanov V, Jakovlev J, Juslén A, Jussila R, Kahanpää J, Kaila L, Jari-PekkaKaitila Kakko A, Kakko I, Karhu A, Karjalainen S, Kjaerandsen J, Koskinen J, Laasonen EM, Laasonen L, Laine E, Lampila P, Levesque-Beaudin V, Lu L, Lähteenaro M, Majuri P, Malmberg S, Manjunath R, Martikainen P, Mattila J, McKeown J, Metsälä P, Miklasevskaja M, Miller M, Miskie R, Muinonen A, Veli-MattiMukkala Naik S, Nikolova N, Nupponen K, Ovaskainen O, Österblad I, Paasivirta L, Pajunen T, Parkko P, Paukkunen J, Penttinen R, Perez K, Pohjoismäki J, Prosser S, Raekunnas M, Rahulan M, Rannisto M, Ratnasingham S, Raukko P, Rinne A, Rintala T, Miranda Romo S, Salmela J, Salokannel J, Savolainen R, Schulman L, Sihvonen P, Soliman D, Sones J, Steinke C, Ståhls G, Tabell J, Tiusanen M, Várkonyi G, Vesterinen EJ, Viitanen E, Vikberg V, Viitasaari M, Vilen J, Warne C, Wei C, Winqvist K, Zakharov E, Mutanen M (2022) A molecular-based identification resource for the arthropods of Finland. Molecular Ecology Resources 22(2): 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13510
  • Sartori M, Thomas A (1989) Contribution à la connaissance du genre Baetis Leach, 1815 en Corse (Ephemeroptera; Baetidae). B. albinatii nov. sp. du groupe muticus (L.). Annales de Limnologie 25(2): 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/1989013
  • Sroka P (2012) Systematics and phylogeny of the West Palaearctic representatives of subfamily Baetinae (Insecta: Ephemeroptera): combined analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology. Aquatic Insects 34(1): 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650424.2012.718081
  • Sroka P, Yanai Z, Palatov D, Gattolliat J-L (2021) Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Takobia Novikova & Kluge, 1987 (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae) in Central Asia. ZooKeys 1071: 127–154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1071.71582
  • Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S (2020) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37(4): 1237–1239. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz312
  • Suchard MA, Lemey P, Baele G, Ayres DL, Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2018) Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evolution 4(1): vey016. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vey016
  • Talavera G, Dincă V, Vila R (2013) Factors affecting species delimitations with the GMYC model: Insights from a butterfly survey. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(12): 1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12107
  • Tenchini R, Cardoni S, Piredda R, Simeone MC, Belfiore C (2018) DNA barcoding and faunistic criteria for a revised taxonomy of Italian Ephemeroptera. The European Zoological Journal 85(1): 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2018.1480732
  • Thomas A, Gagneur J (1994) Compléments et corrections à la faune des Ephéméroptères d’Afrique du Nord. 6. Alainites sadati. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 130: 43–45.
  • Tong X, Dudgeon D (2000) Two new species of Alainites (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) from Hong Kong, China. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 76: 115–120.
  • Waltz RD, McCafferty WP, Thomas A (1994) Systematics of Alainites n. gen., Diphetor, Indobaetis, Nigrobaetis n. stat., and Takobia n. stat. (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae). Bulletin de la Société d’histoire naturelle de Toulouse 130: 33–36.
  • Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ (2009) Jalview Version 2—A multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25(9): 1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
  • Zerrouk M, Dakki M, El Agbani MA, El Alami M, Bennas N, Qninba A, Himmi O (2021) Evolution of the benthic communities in a north African river, the upper Sebou (middle atlas-Morocco) between 1981 and 2017: Effects of global changes. Biologia 76(10): 2973–2989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00787-w
  • Zrelli S, Gattolliat J-L, Boumaïza M, Thomas A (2012) First record of Alainites sadati Thomas, 1994 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Tunisia, description of the larval stage and ecology. Zootaxa 3497(1): e60. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3497.1.6
  • Zuedzang Abessolo J-R, Yacoubi Khebiza M, Messouli M (2021) Réponse des macroinvertébrés benthiques (éphéméroptères, plécoptères, trichoptères) aux pressions anthropiques dans un contexte de changement climatique sur le bassin versant de l’Ourika (Haut-Atlas du Maroc). Hydroécologie Appliquée 21: 115–155. https://doi.org/10.1051/hydro/2021001
login to comment