Short Communication |
Corresponding author: Enrico Ruzzier ( enrico.ruzzier@uniroma3.it ) Academic editor: Miguel Alonso-Zarazaga
© 2023 Matteo Marchioro, Andrew J. Johnson, Laura Besana, Michail Yu. Mandelshtam, Massimo Faccoli, Enrico Ruzzier.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Marchioro M, Johnson AJ, Besana L, Mandelshtam MYu, Faccoli M, Ruzzier E (2023) Taxonomic clarification and lectotype designation for Cryphalus striatulus Mannerheim, 1853 (non Browne, 1978, nec Browne, 1981) (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae), and notes on pervasive homonymy. ZooKeys 1183: 121-124. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1183.107660
|
The bark beetle Cryphalus striatulus Mannerheim, 1853 was described on the basis of two specimens from Alaska, one under the bark of unknown tree and one caught in flight (
Later reviews of North American Cryphalini (sensu Wood, 1954) found that there was a proliferation of described names, many of which represent synonymous taxa (
Habitus and original labels of primary types of species sharing the combination “Cryphalus striatulus”. Specimen photographs are resized to a common scale, black bars represent 1.0 mm A Cryphalus striatulus Mannerheim, 1853; designated lectotype, Zoological Institute (St. Petersburg, Russia) B Cryphalus brownei (Beaver, 1991) (= Cryphalomorphus striatulus Browne, 1978) holotype, NHMUK 010805928 C Cryphalus punctistriatulus Johnson, 2020 (= Cryphalus striatulus Browne, 1981) holotype, NHMUK 010805993.
Additionally, the taxonomic change following the discovery of the type creates a new homonym. Cryphalus striatulus (Browne, 1978) was originally described as Cryphalomorphus striatulus Browne, 1978 on the basis of a single specimen from Penang, Malaysia (Fig.
An additional potential source of confusion is Cryphalus striatulus Browne, 1981 (Fig.
The authors thank Roger A. Beaver for providing some useful documents for this work and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for partially funding the project. Andrew Johnson was funded by National Science Foundation (NSF), the US Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Aphis, and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS)-Division of Plant Industry. Boris A. Anokhin (Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia) is thanked for his help in obtaining photographs of Cryphalus striatulus Mannerheim, 1853 type specimen. We thank Maxwell V. L. Barclay for granting access to the Cryphalus types preserved at the Natural History Museum, London.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This work was supported by European Food Safety Authority and United States Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service, FDACS-Division of Plant Industry.
All authors have contributed equally.
Matteo Marchioro https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2301-1047
Andrew J. Johnson https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3139-2257
Laura Besana https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4670-5775
Michail Y. Mandelshtam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-3239
Massimo Faccoli https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-0516
Enrico Ruzzier https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1020-1247
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.