Research Article
Print
Research Article
First record of the genus Sceloattalus Wittmer, 1966 (Coleoptera, Malachiidae) from China, with description of a new species
expand article infoJunbo Tong, Sergei E. Tshernyshev§|, Haoyu Liu, Yuxia Yang
‡ Hebei University, Baoding, China
§ Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia
| Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia
Open Access

Abstract

The genus Sceloattalus Wittmer, 1966 is recorded from China for the first time. A new species, S. nigroprominens Tong & Yang, sp. nov., is described and illustrated from Xizang Autonomous Region of China. This new species is the fourth member of Sceloattalus and can be easily distinguished from others by the yellow antennae with a small black spot at apex of last antennomere, black elytra without metallic lustre, all tarsi yellow, and hind tibiae yellow to black. The generic diagnosis of Sceloattalus is resummarized. An identification key to all known species of Sceloattalus is also updated.

Key words

Cleroidea, melyrid lineage, new faunistic record, taxonomy

Introduction

Sceloattalus Wittmer, 1966 is a small genus within the tribe Attalini of the family Malachiidae. It consists of three species restricted to Nepal and West Bengal region of India (Tshernyshev 2015). Wittmer (1966) and Tshernyshev (2015, 2021) have previously contributed to the taxonomy of this genus.

Sceloattalus can be easily distinguished from all other genera of Attalini by the sexually dimorphic hind tibiae, which are strongly dilated on the outer side in males, but simple in females (Wittmer 1966; Tshernyshev 2015). Interestingly, Sceloattalus looks similar to Sceloebaeus Tshernyshev, 2015 of the tribe Ebaeini in having modified hind tibiae, but Sceloattalus can be distinguished from Sceloebaeus by the following characters: body larger (4.6–6.5 mm in length), pronotum yellow, tarsomere 4 shorter than 3, tarsomere 2 of the fore tarsi with spur-like comb in males, and undivided pygidium (apical tergite) and ultimate abdominal ventrite (apical sternite). In contrast, Sceloebaeus has a smaller body (about 2.5 mm), a black pronotum, tarsomere 4 approximately as long as 3, simple tarsi lacking specialized male structures, and a divided pygidium and ultimate abdominal ventrite (Wittmer 1999; Tshernyshev 2015).

In this study, a new species of Sceloattalus is described from Xizang Autonomous Region. Sceloattalus is recorded from China for the first time, and it represents the fifth genus belonging to the tribe Attalini in the Chinese fauna (Mayor 2007; Tong et al. 2022). The new species is described and illustrated here under the name of S. nigroprominens sp. nov., and with this addition to the genus, the generic diagnosis is necessarily resummarized here. Additionally, an identification key to all known species of Sceloattalus is updated.

Materials and methods

In this study, malachiid beetles are considered as a family, Malachiidae (Majer 1994, 2002; Mayor 2007; Bocakova et al. 2012; Constantin 2021), instead of a subfamily (e.g. Gimmel et al. 2019).

For descriptions, specialized male structures and genitalia were studied. The term “specialized male structures” is not analogous to the term “Excitatoren”; the latter term means different kinds of structures located in different parts of the males of soft-winged flower beetles and bearing ducts of pheromone glands necessary for female attraction and successful copulation (Evers 1956, 1963, 1988; Matthes 1962). The “specialized male structures” include all typical parts of the male, irrespective of their having pheromone glands or not.

Terminology of terminalia morphology is according to Lawrence et al. (2010), namely (in comparison with previously used terms) pygidium for apical tergite, ultimate abdominal ventrite for apical sternite, and endophallus for the inner sac of the aedeagus.

For dissection, the specimen had its abdomen detached and soaked in 10% solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) by boiling for several minutes. The ovipositor was dyed with haematoxylin. Genitalia were dissected, cleaned, and transferred to glycerol on slides, then photographed with a LEICA DFC450 digital camera attached to a LEICA M205 A microscope. LAS V.4.7 software was used to capture genitalia images. External morphology was observed with a Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscope. Images of adults were taken with a Canon EOS 80D digital camera and focus stacked in Helicon Focus 7. The final plates were prepared in Adobe Photoshop CS 6.0.

Taxonomy

Family Malachiidae Leach, 1815

Sceloattalus Wittmer, 1966

Sceloattalus Wittmer, 1966: 236. Type species: Sceloattalus nepalensis Wittmer, 1966, by original designation.

Diagnosis

Body medium-sized to large, 4.6–6.5 mm in length. Pronotum uniformly yellow, elytra black usually with blue-metallic lustre, except for S. nigroprominens sp. nov. (Fig. 1A, B). Antennae simple and slender. Elytra lacking specialized structures. Male hind tibiae strongly dilated on outer side, and tarsomere 2 of fore tarsi produced in a spur-like comb; both simple in female (Fig. 2A, F). Ultimate abdominal ventrite (apical sternite) short and transverse with a terminal emargination (Fig. 2C).

Figure 1. 

Habitus of Sceloattalus nigroprominens Tong & Yang, sp. nov., dorsal views A holotype, male B paratype, female. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.

Figure 2. 

Sceloattalus nigroprominens Tong & Yang, sp. nov. A–F, holotype, male A fore tarsi B pygidium (apical tergite) C ultimate abdominal ventrite (apical sternite) D male genitalia, lateral view E male genitalia, ventral view F hind tibia G–I paratype, female G pygidium (apical tergite) H ultimate abdominal ventrite (apical sternite) I ovipositor. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Distribution

China (Xizang), Nepal, India (West Bengal).

Sceloattalus nigroprominens Tong & Yang, sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2

Diagnosis

This species is similar to Sceloattalus kopetzi Tshernyshev, 2015 but can be distinguished from the latter by the antennae mostly yellow with a small black spot at apex of last antennomere, elytra without metallic lustre, and tarsi of all legs yellow. In contrast, S. kopetzi has antennae mostly black with antennomeres 1–4 yellow, elytra with blue-metallic lustre, and tarsi yellow to black.

Materials examined

Holotype: China: Xizang: ♂, Nang, Nyingchi, 3100 m elev., 29.VI.1997, Chaodong Zhu leg (IZAS). Paratype: China: Xizang: 1♀, same data as holotype (IZAS). The type specimens are deposited in Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (IZAS).

Description

Male. Length of body 4.8 mm; width at widest part of elytra 1.9 mm and at the base of elytra 1.5 mm.

Body yellow, with elytra and metathorax black. (Fig. 1A). Mandibles somewhat black. Antennae with a small black spot at apex of last antennomere. Fore legs with a small black spur-like comb on tarsomere 2 (Fig. 2A), hind legs yellow to black. Vesicles and thoracic mesepimera yellow. Elytra covered with black setae, while head and pronotum double consisting of yellow adpressed pubescence and sparse black stiff bristles. Sculptures evenly punctuated, stronger on elytra than other parts.

Head narrower than pronotum. Frons slightly impressed. Clypeus distinct. Antennae filiform extending over the apical quarter of the elytra; antennomere 1 elongate and clavate; 2 shortened and rectangular; 3 and 4 slightly widened; 5–11 cylindrical and approximately equal in length.

Pronotum transverse, anterior margin slightly protruding, posterior margin flattened and curved upwards.

Scutellar shield small, triangular, almost completely covered by pronotum.

Elytra slightly widened behind base; base of elytra approximately as wide as pronotum. Humeri distinct, slightly protruding. Disc without metallic lustre. Elytral apices evenly rounded.

Hind wings normally developed.

Legs slender. Hind femora not reaching elytral apices. All tibiae thin and straight. All tarsi with 5 tarsomeres; tarsomere 2 of fore tarsi produced in a spur-like comb, not extending over the tarsomere 3 (Fig. 2A); tarsomere 1 longest and tarsomere 4 shortest in mid and hind legs. Claws thin, curved, with membrane at base and long setae at middle.

Metathorax simple, lacking appendages. Pygidium (apical tergite) broad, with triangular emargination on distal side (Fig. 2B); ultimate abdominal ventrite (apical sternite) short, transverse, with a triangular emargination terminally (Fig. 2C). Tegmen short and wide; aedeagus stout, slightly narrowing to blunt apex in ventral view (Fig. 2D, E).

Female. Length of body 4.8 mm; width at widest part of elytra 1.9 mm and at the base of elytra 1.5 mm.

Similar to male species except for hind legs uniformly yellow and not dilated at apices of tibiae (Fig. 1B). Pygidium subtrapezoid (Fig. 2G). Ultimate abdominal ventrite subtriangular, with long spiculum ventrale (Fig. 2H). Ovipositor elongate and membranous (Fig. 2I).

Distribution

China (Xizang).

Etymology

The specific epithet nigroprominens derives from the Latin words “niger” (black) and “prominens” (prominent) and refers to the black prominence on hind tibiae.

Key to the species of the genus Sceloattalus Wittmer, 1966

Males only

1 Head uniformly black; all legs black S. nepalensis Wittmer, 1966
Head mostly yellow; legs uniformly or somewhat yellow 2
2 Antennae yellow with a small black spot at apex of last antennomere; elytra without metallic lustre; fore legs uniformly yellow S. nigroprominens Tong & Yang, sp. nov.
Antennae mostly black; elytra with blue or violet metallic lustre; fore legs yellow to black 3
3 Antennae black with antennomeres 1–4 yellow; tarsi yellow to black; mid and hind legs almost completely yellow S. kopetzi Tshernyshev, 2015
Antennae black with outer sides of antennomeres 1–3 yellow; tarsi uniformly black; mid and hind legs almost completely black S. bengalensis (Pic, 1907)

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our appreciation to Dr. Robert Constantin (Saint-Lô, France) and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable suggestions and comments on our manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

The present study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32270491), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (no. C2022201005), the Interdisciplinary Research Program of Natural Science of Hebei University (no. DXK202103) and the Excellent Youth Scientific Research and Innovation Team of Hebei University (no. 605020521005). Also, this study was supported in part by the Program of Basic Scientific Research (FNI) of the State Academies of Sciences (no. 0247-2021-0004, grant no. 1021051703269-9-1.6.12).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: HL. Funding acquisition: YY, HL. Resources: YY. Supervision: SEET. Visualization: JT. Writing - original draft: JT. Writing - review and editing: SEET, YY.

Author ORCIDs

Junbo Tong https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0116-0204

Sergei E. Tshernyshev https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5931-9241

Haoyu Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1383-5560

Yuxia Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3118-6659

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Constantin R (2021) Malachiidae Fleming, 1821. In: Tronquet M (Ed.) Catalogue des Coléoptères de France. Association Roussillonnaise d’Entomologie, Perpignan, 487–492.
  • Evers AMJ (1956) Über die Funktion der Excitatoren beim Liebesspiel der Malachiidae (11. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Malachiidae). Entomologische Blatter fur Biologie und Systematik der Kafer 52: 165–169.
  • Evers AMJ (1963) Über die Entstehung der Excitatoren und deren Bedeutung für die Evolution der Malachiidae (Col.) (19. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Malachiidae). Acta Zoologica Fennica 103: 1–24.
  • Evers AMJ (1988) Zür Evolution von Koadaptationen. Die Excitatoren bei den Malachiidae. Entomologische Blätter 84: 61–66.
  • Gimmel ML, Bocakova M, Gunter NL, Leschen RA (2019) Comprehensive phylogeny of the Cleroidea (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia). Systematic Entomology 44(3): 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12338
  • Lawrence JF, Beutel RG, Leschen RAB, Ślipiński SA (2010) Chapter 2. Glossary of Morphological Terms. In: Leschen RAB, Beutel RG, Lawrence JF (Eds) Handbook of Zoology, Coleoptera. Vol. 2. Morphology and Systematics (Elateroidea, Bostrichformia, Cucujiformia partim). Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911213.9
  • Majer K (1994) A review of the classification of the Melyridae and related families (Coleoptera, Cleroidea). Entomologica Basiliensia 17: 319–390.
  • Majer K (2002) Subfamilial classification of the family Malachiidae (Coleoptera, Cleroidea). Entomologica Basiliensia 24: 179–244.
  • Matthes D (1962) Excitatoren und paarungsverhalten Mitteleuropaischer Malachiiden (Coleopt., Malacodermata). Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 54(4): 375–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406263
  • Mayor AJ (2007) Family Malachiidae Fleming, 1821. In: Löbl I, Smetana A (Eds) Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Volume 4, ElateroideaDerodontoideaBostrichoideaLymexyloideaCleroideaCucujoidea. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 415–454.
  • Pic M (1907) Diagnoses de coléoptères asiatiques nouveaux. L’Échange. Revue Linnéenne 23: 171–174.
  • Tshernyshev SE (2015) Taxonomic problems in the genus Sceloattalus Wittmer, 1966 (Coleoptera, Malachiidae). Biodiversität und Naturausstattung im Himalaya 5: 381–387.
  • Tshernyshev SE (2021) New and little-known soft-winged flower beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Malachiidae) from the Nepal Himalayas. Biodiversität und Naturausstattung im Himalaya 7: 485–499. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.817.1763
  • Wittmer W (1966) 26. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der indo-malayischen Malacodermata. Mitteilungen der Schweizerische Entomologische Gesellschaft 38(3–4): 229–237.
  • Wittmer W (1999) Zur Kenntnis der Familie Malachiidae (Coleoptera). 3. Beitrag. Entomologica Basiliensia 21: 171–252.
login to comment