Research Article
Print
Research Article
Review of the Idaea proximaria complex (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Sterrhinae) with descriptions of four new species
expand article infoRui Cheng, Da-Yong Xue, Nan Jiang, Hong-Xiang Han
‡ Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

The Idaea proximaria complex is reviewed and four new species are described from China: Idaea rectangularis Cheng & Han, sp. nov. from Guangxi and Fujian provinces, Idaea rectispina Cheng & Han, sp. nov. from Hunan province, Idaea setosa Xue & Han, sp. nov. from Hainan province, and Idaea linearis Xue & Han, sp. nov. from Hubei and Shaanxi provinces. Illustrations of adults and genitalia of the new species and known species are presented, and the variations in the form of the aedeagus of Idaea proximaria are discussed.

Key words

China, endemic, tarsus, variation

Introduction

Idaea Treitschke is the third most species-rich genus in the Geometridae, including 1080 valid species (Rajaei et al. 2022) with a worldwide distribution. Sterneck (1940) subdivided the genus (as Sterrha) into 34 species groups based on characters of the aedeagus. Hausmann (2004) largely followed his partition and divided 107 European species and many species distributed in adjacent countries into 26 species groups. However, Idaea proximaria (Leech, 1897) was not included in these two important publications, because it is a species endemic to China. Idaea proximaria was originally described by Leech (1897) in the genus Chrysocraspeda, based on two male specimens from Moupin, Sichuan, and Leech stated that it was allied to Hyria marginata Swinhoe. Prout (1913) placed this species in Ptychopoda (Section B. Ptychopoda) on the basis of the lack of terminal spurs on the male hind tibia, and provided a description and comparison with Chrysocraspeda marginata. Later, Prout (1938) placed it in the genus Sterrha (Section B. Ptychopoda), and compared it to Sterrha craspedota Prout (replacement name for Hyria marginata Swinhoe). In the geometrid catalogue of Scoble (1999), both proximaria and craspedota are listed in the genus Idaea. The main differences between I. proximaria and I. craspedota are that the forewing areole is present in I. proximaria but absent in I. craspedota, and while the first male hind tarsus is slightly dilated in I. craspedota, in I. proximaria the modification of the male hind tarsus is very distinctive, with the first segment of hind tarsus broad and flat, shaped like a bird’s wing, and a long hair-pencil is present from the base of the tibia to the tip of the tarsus.

Further study of the specimens of Idaea proximaria from IZCAS shows that four new species need to be described. The purposes of this paper are to provide a survey of the Idaea proximaria complex, to describe four new species, and to provide illustrations of the external features and genitalia of all the species.

Materials and methods

Specimens used are from the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (IZCAS). Terminology for the genitalia is based on Pierce (1914, reprinted 1976), Klots (1970), and Nichols (1989). Moths were photographed with a digital camera (Canon Pc1057). Composite images were generated using Auto-Montage software v. 5.03.0061 (Synoptics Ltd). The sharpness-contrast of the photos was enhanced and the plates compiled using Adobe Photoshop (CS 5.1).

Four specimens of I. proximaria were used for sequencing the DNA barcoding region of the mitochondrial COI gene, and DNA barcodes (658 bp) of these four specimens were obtained. Three sequences of the related species I. craspedota were downloaded from BOLD. Protocols of DNA extraction and sequencing followed Ban et al. (2018). Details of studied specimens, including GenBank accession numbers are summarised in Table 1. A neighbour-joining (NJ) tree (Saitou and Nei 1987) was constructed based on the Kimura two-parameter (K2P) method (Kimura 1980) using MEGA 6.0. In addition, to explore the taxonomic position of proximaria complex, some other Idaea sequences were downloaded and constructed the NJ tree.

Table 1.

Details of specimens used in molecular analysis of the DNA barcode region.

Sample ID Species Date collected Locality Collectors GenBank accession number
LEP M 31611 I. proximaria 16–19.vii.2017 Jinsixia, Shaanxi Cui L OR094697
LEP M 31612 I. proximaria 16–19.vii.2017 Jinsixia, Shaanxi Cui L OR094698
LEP M 31619 I. proximaria 16–19.vii.2017 Jinsixia, Shaanxi Cui L OR094699
LEP M 31623 I. proximaria 16–19.vii.2017 Jinsixia, Shaanxi Cui L OR094700
RMNH.INS.13917 I. craspedota 28.xi.2005 Indonesia EJ van Nieukerken, E Gassó HM387102
RMNH.INS.13918 I. craspedota 29.xi.2005 Indonesia EJ van Nieukerken GU662733
RMNH.INS.14291 I. craspedota 14.xi.2005 Indonesia R de Jong GU662632

Systematics

Idaea proximaria complex

No treatment of the species group of I. proximaria was found in the literature. It is not easy to place it into the known species groups, and it can be regarded as a separate species group, named the proximaria complex in the present work. The species in the proximaria complex share the following characters: antennae ciliate in male and filiform in female; frons flat, black; male hind tibia without spurs, first segment of hind tarsus very broad and flat, modified into the shape of a bird’s wing (Figs 1, 2); female hind tibia with a pair of terminal spurs; adults with pale brown ground colour, small discal dot present on both wings, postmedial line usually appearing as small dots on veins, terminal margin a narrow dark purplish brown band; male genitalia with broad uncus, aedeagus with various numbers of cornuti; female genitalia with ductus bursae often broad, bearing an elongate appendix bursae, corpus bursae small or large, spinulose.

Based on the total available Idaea sequences, a NJ tree with weak support value (Suppl. material 1) still failed to solve the phylogenetic relationships of the proximaria complex and its taxonomic position within Idaea remains unclear. The modification of the first male hind tarsus is reminiscent of those of I. filicata (Hübner), I. troglodytaria (Heydenreich), and I. efflorata Zeller, with text figures provided in Hausmann (2004: figs 18, 19, 21), which are placed in rusticata species group. This modification may indicate a close relationship between the two groups. However, the tarsus is vestigial and only the hind tibia is terminally dilated into a spoon-shape in I. filicata and I. troglodytaria (Hausmann, 2004: 91, 92). The hair-pencil of the proximaria complex is very long and extends to the tip of the tarsus, but is shorter and covering only 2/3 of the tarsus in I. efflorata (Hausmann, 2004: 96). In addition, the male hind tibia of some other species including I. rusticata (Denis & Schiffermüller) in the rusticata species group bear spurs, which are absent in species assigned to the proximaria complex.

Idaea proximaria (Leech, 1897)

Figs 3–7, 16–19, 24–26, 30

Chrysocraspeda proximaria Leech, 1897: 106. Syntypes 2♂, China (western): Moupin (NHMUK).

Ptychopoda proximaria: Prout 1913: 101.

Sterrha proximaria: Prout 1934: 414.

Idaea proximaria: Scoble 1999: 504.

Material examined

China: Shaanxi (IZCAS): 1♂, Ningshan, Huoditang, 1497 m, 29–31.VII.2018, leg. Zhang Xinyi; 1♂1♀, Taibai, Huangbaiyuan, 1279 m, 15–17.VII.2018, leg. Zhang Xinyi; 2♂, Foping, Yueba, 1052 m, 1–3.VIII.2018, leg. Zhang Xinyi; 1♀, Ningshan, Guanghuojie, Baohuzhan, 1189 m, 26–28.VII.2014, leg. Liu Shuxian, slide no. Geom-5167; 11♂1♀, Ningshan, Guanghuojie, 1101 m, 27–28.VII.2018, leg. Zhang Xinyi, slide no. Geom-5928 (♂); 13♂3♀, Shangnan, Jinsixia, 766–777 m, 23–25.VII.2013, 16–19.VII.2017, leg. Cui Le, slide no. Geom-5136 (♂), 5137 (♂), 5138 (♀), 5163 (♂), 5164 (♂), 5165 (♂), 5166 (♂), 5168 (♀), 5184 (♂), 5185 (♂). Hubei (IZCAS): 13♂2♀, Shennongjia, Chaoshuihe, 860 m, 21–23.VI.2019, leg. Cheng Rui. Sichuan (IZCAS): 1♂4♀, Emeishan, Qingyinge, 800–1000 m, 19.VI.–15.VII.1957, leg. Zhu Fuxing et al., slide no. Geom-5162 (♀); 5♂, Mianzhu, Jiulongshan, Shizipo, 810 m, 29–31.VII.2016, leg. Cui Le, slide no. Geom-4134 (♂), 5158 (♂), 5186 (♂); 8♂5♀, Baoxing, Fengtongzhai, Dashuigou, 1590 m, 1–5.VIII.2016, leg. Cui Le, slide no. Geom-4135 (♀), 5180 (♂); 3♂1♀, Chongzhou, Jiguanshan, Anzihe, Shaoyaogou, 1556 m, 11–16.VII.2016, leg. Cui Le, slide no. Geom-4141 (♂); 11♂12♀, Mianzhu, Dajianping, 877 m, 17–18.VII.2019, leg. Zhang Xinyi; 6♂7♀, Wenchuan, Huangjiacun, 1033 m, 13–14.VII.2019, leg. Zhang Xinyi; 13♂11♀, Pengzhou, Dingjiawanping, 1088 m, 15–16.VII.2019, leg. Zhang Xinyi; 6♂7♀, Tianquan, Lianglukou, 1405 m, 1–2.VII.2019, leg. Zhang Xinyi.

Diagnosis

As Prout (1913, 1938) stated, I. proximaria is similar to I. craspedota (Fig. 14) in the wing pattern, but the latter lacks the areole on the forewing. The genitalia of the two species are quite different: the uncus is truncate with tiny protuberances in I. proximaria, but tapering and pointed in I. craspedota (Fig. 23); the gnathos is developed in I. proximaria, but only bears a blunt median process in I. craspedota; the valva has different decorations in I. proximaria, but is very narrow and simple in I. craspedota; the anellus is very large in I. proximaria but reduced in I. craspedota. In the female genitalia, the ductus bursae of I. proximaria is very broad but quite narrow in I. craspedota (Fig. 34).

Redescription

Head. Antennae ciliate in male, filiform with sparse cilia in female, cilia shorter in female. Frons dark, with sparsely scattered brown scales, not protruding. Labial palpus dark brown on dorsal side and paler on ventral side, third segment ~ 1/2 length of second segment, extending beyond frons. Vertex pale brown.

Thorax. Tegula pale brown. Hind leg in male modified; hind tibia dilated; first segment of tarsus very broad and flat, shaped like a bird’s wing, covered with darkish scales, the inner side bearing a bunch of long hair-pencils from base of tibia to tip of tarsus, other tarsomeres vestigial. Hind tibia in female normal, with one pair of terminal spurs. Forewing length: male 9–11 mm, female 9–12 mm. Wings pale brown, diffused with dark scales. Forewing with costa straight, distal one-third convex; apex protruding; outer margin slightly convex. Forewing with costa dark purplish brown; antemedial line vague, discernible by a small patch on costal margin; postmedial line sinuous, appearing as black dots on veins, vague between veins; terminal margin a narrow dark purplish brown band; an indistinct darkish patch present at middle of hind margin. Hind wing with outer margin slightly protruding on vein M3; postmedial line and terminal margin same as on forewing. Both wings with black discal spot. Fringes reddish brown, decorated with dark scales on vein ends. Underside: paler than upperside; forewing with basal part diffused with greyish scales; postmedial line more continuous than on upperside; terminal band much narrower.

Abdomen. Dorsal side pale brown, decorated with dark brown scales, dense on intersegment; ventral side pale brown.

Male genitalia. Uncus spatulate, with two tiny lateral and ventral protuberances at tip. Gnathos developed, tongue-like. Valva long and slender, apex rounded and setose; dorsal margin almost straight to slightly convex, with a subapical mound-like protrusion; ventral margin with a blunt central protrusion. Anellus a very large sclerite, posterior margin smooth and strongly protruding, lateral margin with lower half spinulose. Saccus blunt. Aedeagus short, terminal two-thirds sclerotised and stout, cornutus with one or two spines.

Female genitalia. Ovipositor lobes with small ventral protrusion. Apophyses posteriores ~ 2× length of apophyses anteriores. Region around ostium strongly sclerotised, lamella postvaginalis and antevaginalis irregularly shaped. Ductus bursae very long and broad, wrinkled, with a large scobinate area, anteriorly membranous, the middle part decorated with long spines, posteriorly, with a well sclerotised pouch-like process; an elongate diverticulum present, diverging posteriorly. Corpus bursae small, with a rounded spinose patch.

Distribution

China (Shaanxi, Hubei, Sichuan).

Remarks

It has not been possible to examine the genitalia of the syntypes of I. proximaria since neither of them has been dissected. However, since the syntypes and the complete series in the NHMUK (the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom) are from Sichuan and we have only seen one species in the complex from Sichuan province, it is reasonable to assume that this is the species described by Leech.

Figures 1–15. 

(1–2) Male hind tibia and tarsus of Idaea proximaria 1 lateral view 2 medial view. (3–14) Adults of Idaea proximaria complex 3–7 I. proximaria 3 male, Jiguanshan, Sichuan 4 female, Baoxing, Sichuan 5–7 Jinsixia, Shaanxi 5–6 male 7 female 8–9 I. rectangularis sp. nov. 8 holotype, male, IZCAS 9 paratype, female, IZCAS 10 I. rectispina sp. nov., holotype, male, IZCAS 11–12 I. setosa sp. nov. 11 holotype, male, IZCAS 12 paratype, female, IZCAS 13 I. linearis sp. nov., holotype, female, IZCAS 14 I. craspedota. 15 Neighbour-Joining (NJ) tree of selected proximaria complex based on the Kimura two-parameter model. Scale bar: 1 cm (3–14).

Figures 16–27. 

(16–23) Male genitalia of Idaea proximaria complex 16–19 I. proximaria 16–17 Shizipo, Sichuan 18–19 Jinsixia, Shaanxi 20 I. rectangularis sp. nov., holotype 21 I. rectispina sp. nov., holotype 22 I. setosa sp. nov., holotype 23 I. craspedota. (24–27) Aedeagus of I. proximaria complex 24–26 I. proximaria 24 Dashuigou, Sichuan 25 Shizipo, Sichuan 26 Jinsixia, Shaanxi 27 I. rectangularis sp. nov., holotype. Scale bars: 1 mm.

In I. proximaria, the aedeagus has a varying number of cornuti on the vesica. For example, some only have one large bent spine (Fig. 24); some have two spines of equal length (Fig. 25), or of different sizes (Fig. 26). The conditions of one spine and two equally sized spines occur among the specimens collected from Shizipo, Sichuan province, and that of two spines of different sizes occur among specimens collected from Jinsixia, Shaanxi province. Other differences could not be found in the armament of the male genitalia (Figs 16–19) or in the female genitalia and wings (Figs 3–7). To determine whether these differences are of intraspecific variations or different species, four fresh specimens from Jinsixia, Shaanxi province were used to obtain barcoding sequences; of these specimens, LEP M 31611 and 31619 bear two equal-sized spines, LEP M 31612 bears two differently sized spines, and LEP M 31623 is a female. The result (Fig. 15) shows that no genetic distance can be found between the four specimens; thus, these specimens are considered to belong to the same species. The genetic distance between I. proximaria and I. craspedota is 8.36% (Fig. 15).

Most public Idaea sequences on BOLD were downloaded, including 32 sequences from China, and a NJ tree was constructed (Suppl. material 1). In the NJ tree, I. proximaria is clustered with two unnamed specimens with very low support values, which means this relationship is unreliable. Through calculating pairwise distances, I. politaria (Hübner) of inquinata species group was found as the nearest related species with a genetic distance 6.15%; however, it is very far from I. proximaria on the NJ tree. It can be inferred that, on the basis of the public COI sequences available on BOLD, the closest species to I. proximaria has not yet been found.

In the present work, the main purpose of DNA barcoding is to identify whether I. proximaria has intraspecific variation; the results of NJ tree for a large number of species are not included, which is beyond the scope of this work, and only three sequences of I. craspedota, with similar wing patterns, are included (Fig. 15).

Idaea rectangularis Cheng & Han, sp. nov.

Figs 8, 9, 20, 27, 31

Type material

Holotype , ♂, China: Guangxi (IZCAS): Jinxiu, Linhaishanzhuang, 1000 m, 2.VII.2000, leg. Li Wenzhu, slide no. Geom-5160. Paratypes: Guangxi (IZCAS): 1♂2♀, same data as holotype, slide no. Geom-5161(♀); 1♀, Huanjiang, Yangmeiao, 1189 m, 18–22.VII.2015, leg. Jiang Nan, slide no. Geom-5187. Fujian (IZCAS): 1♀, Chongan, Xingcun, Guadun, 900–1160 m, 8.VII.1963, leg. Zhang Youwei; 1♀, Wuyishan, Dazhulan, 1150 m, 28.VII.2006, leg. Xue Dayong, slide no. Geom-5182.

Diagnosis

Compared to I. proximaria, the forewing apex of I. rectangularis is somewhat sharper, and the first segment of male hind tarsus is darker. The male genitalia of I. rectangularis are similar to those of I. proximaria, but can be differentiated by the following characters: the anellus is smaller than that of I. proximaria, and the anterior half lacks spines on the lateral margin in I. rectangularis whereas these are present in I. proximaria; the valva possesses a small blunt finger-like process in I. rectangularis, whereas in I. proximaria there is only a protrusion which does not form a process ; the slightly concave uncus is also different. The aedeagus is distinguished by the number of the cornuti, which is five in I. rectangularis, including one right-angled spine, but only one or two in I. proximaria. In the female genitalia, the region surrounding the ostium is not totally sclerotised, with a separate lamella postvaginalis. The ductus bursae lacks a bag-like process in I. rectangularis but it is present in I. proximaria.

Description

Head. Antennae ciliate in male, filiform in female. Frons, labial palpus, vertex identical to I. proximaria.

Thorax. Hind leg similar to that of I. proximaria, but first segment of male hind tarsus blackish grey. Forewing length: male 10 mm, female 10–11 mm. Wing pattern and markings similar to those of I. proximaria, except that the apex of the male forewing protrudes further.

Abdomen. Male genitalia. Uncus spatulate, posterior margin slightly concave. Gnathos developed, tapering. Valva long and slender, with a sclerotised ridge at middle; apex rounded and setose; dorsal margin slightly concave at middle, with a faint subapical protuberance; ventral margin deeply concave near middle, with a small finger-like blunt process. Saccus blunt. Anellus a large sclerite, posterior half rounded, anterior half an inverted trapezoid. Aedeagus stout, terminal two-thirds sclerotised and broadened; cornutus with five spines, one larger than the rest and right-angled; vesica with a scobinate area.

Female genitalia. Ovipositor lobes with a small ventral protrusion. Apophyses posteriores ~ 2× length of apophyses anteriores. Lamella postvaginalis a laterally elongate sclerite, wrinkled. Lamella antevaginalis shapeless, but with left side of ostium strongly sclerotised, scobinate anteriorly. Ductus bursae very broad, wrinkled, the large posterior half decorated with long spines, anteriorly slightly sclerotised; an elongate posteriorly diverging appendix bursae present. Corpus bursae small, rounded, decorated with an oval spinose patch.

Distribution

China (Guangxi, Fujian).

Etymology

This species is named from Latin word rectangularis, which refers to the one right-angled cornutus.

Idaea rectispina Cheng & Han, sp. nov.

Figs 10, 21, 28

Type material

Holotype , ♂, China: Hunan (IZCAS): Yanling, Taoyuandong, 631 m, 4–8.VII.2008, leg. Chen Fuqiang, slide no. Geom-5159.

Diagnosis

In the male genitalia, I. rectispina is similar to I. rectangularis in having a concave uncus, tongue-like gnathos, and in the presence of a small finger-like process on the ventral margin of the valva. However, small but differently sized protrusions are present on the valval costal margin of I. rectispina, but absent in I. rectangularis. The number of cornuti in the aedeagus is six and all are straight in I. rectispina, as opposed to the five in I. rectangularis with one right-angled.

Description

Wing pattern almost identical to that of I. proximaria, I. rectangularis, and I. setosa. First segment of male hind tarsus covered with blackish scales. Forewing length: male 10 mm.

Abdomen. Male genitalia. Uncus spatulate, posterior margin slightly concave. Gnathos developed, tongue-like, with tip narrow. Valva long and slender, apex rounded and setose; dorsal margin with basal half decorated with small protrusions of different sizes, asymmetrical on the left and right valvae; ventral margin concave at middle, with a small blunt finger-like process. Saccus narrow and blunt. Anellus a large sclerite. Aedeagus with terminal part broadened, cornutus with six straight spines, vesica also with a scobinate area.

Female genitalia. Unknown.

Distribution

China (Hunan).

Etymology

This species is named from Latin prefix rect- and Latin word spina, referring to the straight spines of the cornutus.

Idaea setosa Xue & Han, sp. nov.

Figs 11–12, 22, 29, 32

Type material

Holotype , ♂, China: Hainan (IZCAS): Qiongzhong, Limushan, Qijiacun, 657 m, 6–7.IV.2010, leg. Jiang Nan, slide no. Geom-5140. Paratypes: Hainan (IZCAS): 1♂1♀, Jianfengling, 900 m, 12.IV.1980, leg. Zhang Baolin; 1♂, Baisha, Yinggeling, Nankai, Mohaocun, 336 m, 15–16.IV.2010, leg. Jiang Nan; 1♂1♀, Bawangling, Dongerlinchang, 1015 m, 8–10.V.2007, leg. Chen Fuqiang, slide no. Geom-5141(♀).

Diagnosis

The wing pattern is almost identical to that of I. proximaria, I. rectangularis, and I. rectispina. The first segment of the male hind tarsus is pure brown, which is different from the blackish hind tarsus in other species. In the male genitalia, I. setosa is distinctive in the proximaria complex by the uncus having a swollen posterior half, by the triangular gnathos, and by the valva having a subapical ventral spine. The aedeagus is even in width, not broadened posteriorly, and the cornutus has many more spines than in the other species. The female genitalia are distinctive with a very short ductus bursae and the large corpus bursae.

Description

Forewing length: male 10 mm, female 9–12 mm. First segment of male hind tarsus pure brown. Head and wing pattern almost identical to I. proximaria, I. rectangularis, and I. rectispina. Forewing costa lacking dark purplish brown scales in females.

Abdomen. Male genitalia. Uncus long, with posterior half swollen and rounded. Gnathos nearly triangular, with blunt tip. Valva long and slender, tapering, apex rounded and setose; dorsal margin nearly straight and only slightly convex near tip; ventral margin with basal two-thirds straight, concave near apex, bearing a finger-like blunt process. Saccus blunt. Anellus a large sclerite, posterior margin flat, slightly tapering towards anterior margin. Aedeagus in even width, cornutus a bunch of long spines, more than 30 spines.

Female genitalia. Ovipositor lobes with small ventral protrusion. Apophyses posteriores ~ 2× length of apophyses anteriores. Region around ostium membranous, lamella postvaginalis and antevaginalis unmodified. Ductus bursae very short, a small pouch-like process present, an elongate diverticulum present. Corpus bursae very large and rounded, a rounded sclerotised patch present at middle of posterior half, bearing needle-like spines.

Figures 28–34. 

(28–29) Aedeagus of I. proximaria complex 28 I. rectispina sp. nov., holotype 29 I. setosa sp. nov., holotype (30–34) Female genitalia of I. proximaria complex 30 I. proximaria 31 I. rectangularis sp. nov., paratype 32 I. setosa sp. nov., paratype 33 I. linearis sp. nov., holotype 34 I. craspedota. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Distribution

China (Hainan).

Etymology

This species is named from Latin word setosus, referring to the bunch of long spines in the cornutus.

Idaea linearis Xue & Han, sp. nov.

Figs 13, 33

Type material

Holotype , ♀, China: Hubei (IZCAS): Yingshan, Taohuachong, 590 m, 23–27.VI.2014, leg. Xue Dayong, slide no. Geom-5170. Paratypes: Hubei (IZCAS), 5♀, same data as holotype, leg. Jiang Nan et al., slide no. Geom-5169. Shaanxi (IZCAS): 1♀, Zhashui, Yingpanzhen, Niubeiliang, Laolin, 1046 m, 12–15.VII.2017, leg. Cui Le; 1♀, Foping, Yueba, 1093 m, 29.VI.–1.VII.2012, leg. Li Jing, slide no. Geom-5183; 1♀, Shangnan, Jinsixia, 766 m, 16–19.VII.2017, leg. Cui Le, slide no. Geom-5139.

Diagnosis

On the wing pattern, I. linearis is distinctive in that the postmedial line is continuous and does not form black dots on the veins. The female genitalia are distinguished by the smooth lamella postvaginalis, which is divided posteriorly and bears a pair of processes; by the connection of the spinules of the ductus bursae and the corpus bursae, which form a spoon-shaped patch; and by the presence of the appendix bursae diverging anteriorly from the corpus bursae.

Description

Head and wing patterns almost identical to previous species, except that the postmedial line is continuous rather than consisting of black spots on veins. Forewing length: female 10–11 mm. Forewing costa lacking dark purplish brown scales in female, unknown in male.

Abdomen. Male genitalia. Unknown.

Female genitalia. Ovipositor lobes with small ventral protrusion. Apophyses posteriores ~ 2× length of apophyses anteriores. Lamella postvaginalis an elongate smooth sclerite, posterior margin divided, with a pair of proximal processes. Lamella antevaginalis shapeless. Ductus bursae short, wrinkled and spinulose, with a small, rounded, appendix bursae. Corpus bursae nearly oval, lateral half spinulose and joined with spinules of ductus bursae, expanded into centre of corpus bursae, spoon-shaped; with a long, elongate anterior appendix bursae. Seventh sternite with a pair of small proximal bag-like protrusions.

Distribution

China (Shaanxi, Hubei).

Etymology

This species is named from the Latin word linearis, referring to the linear postmedial line.

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere thanks to Sir Anthony Galsworthy, London, for correcting the English, and giving valuable suggestions and corrections for the Latin names of the new species.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This project was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (32170464), the National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (Grant No. 2019FY101800), Biological Resources Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KFJ-BRP-017-45), and by a grant (Y229YX5105) from the Key Laboratory of the Zoological Systematics and Evolution of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: RC, NJ, DYX, HXH. Data and analysis: RC, HXH, DYX. Funding acquisition: HXH. Investigation: RC, NJ. Writing – original draft: HXH, RC, DYX. Writing – review and editing: HXH, RC, NJ, DYX.

Author ORCIDs

Rui Cheng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-4724

Da-Yong Xue https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-4459

Nan Jiang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-1385

Hong-Xiang Han https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-2902

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Ban XS, Jiang N, Cheng R, Xue DY, Han HX (2018) Tribal classification and phylogeny of Geometrinae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) inferred from seven gene regions. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 184(3): 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zly013
  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  • Klots AB (1970) Lepidoptera. In: Tuxen SL (Ed.) Taxonomist’s Glossary of Genitalia in Insects. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 115–130.
  • Nichols SW (1989) The Torre-Bueno Glossary of Entomology. New York Entomological Society/American Museum of Natural History, New York, 840 pp.
  • Pierce N (1914) The Genitalia of the Group Geometridae of the British Islands. E.W. Classey, Middlesex, 88 pp. [Reprinted 1976]
  • Prout LB (1913 [1912–1916]) The Palaearctic Geometrae. In: Seitz A (Ed.) The Macrolepidoptera of the World. Vol. 4. Verlag A. Kernen, Stuttgart, 479 pp.
  • Prout LB (1938 [1920–1941]) The Indoaustralian Geometridae. In: Seitz A (Ed.) The Macrolepidoptera of the World. Vol. 12. Verlag A. Kernen, Stuttgart, 356 pp.
  • Rajaei H, Hausmann A, Scoble M, Wanke D, Plotkin D, Brehm G, Murillo-Ramos L, Sihvonen P (2022) An online taxonomic facility of Geometridae (Lepidoptera), with an overview of global species richness and systematics. Integrative Systematics: Stuttgart Contributions to Natural History 5(2): 145–192. https://doi.org/10.18476/2022.577933
  • Scoble MJ [Ed.] (1999) Geometrid Moths of the World: A Catalogue (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, Australia, 1200 pp. https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643101050
  • Sterneck J (1940) Versuch einer Darstellung der systematischen Beziehungen bei den palaearktischen Sterrhinae (Acidaliinae), Studien über Acidaliinae (Sterrhinae) VII. Teil: Die Gattung Sterrha und deren nächste Verwandte. Zeitschrift des Wiener Entomologen-Vereines 25: 6–17, 25–36, 56–59, 77–79, 98–107, 126–128, 136–142, 152–159, 161–176.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

NJ tree of total Idaea species

Rui Cheng, Da-Yong Xue, Nan Jiang, Hong-Xiang Han

Data type: Phylogenetic

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (812.51 kb)
login to comment