Research Article
Print
Research Article
Four new terrestrial earthworm species from the northeast Thailand (Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae)
expand article infoRatmanee Chanabun, Anuwat Aoonkum, Teerapong Seesamut§, Ueangfa Bantaowong|, Somsak Panha
‡ Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand
§ Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, PathumThani, Thailand
¶ Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Open Access

Abstract

Earthworm specimens collected from Sakon Nakhon and Nakhon Phanom, northeast Thailand, were found to contain four new species in the family Megascolecidae, with one species in the genus Metaphire Sims & Easton, 1972, and the other three in the genus Amynthas Kinberg, 1867. These are herein named Metaphire songkhramensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov. in the sexthecal houlleti species group, and Amynthas sakonnakhonensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov., A. auriculus Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov., and A. bantanensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov. in the sexthecal aelianus species group. Metaphire songkhramensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov. occurs in dark clay soil of the oxbow lake of the river, Amynthas sakonnakhonensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov. occurs in wetland area, A. auriculus Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov. occurs in dark sandy loam habitats of mixed deciduous forest while the following species, A. bantanensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov. occurs in sandy loam habitats of paddy fields. Descriptions of the new species, including illustrations of the external and internal morphological characteristics, are provided.

Key words

Amynthas, Metaphire, new species, taxonomy, Thailand

Introduction

Earthworms are common macro-soil invertebrates found in almost all parts of the world, in all types of habitats, such as terrestrial, aquatic, and semi-aquatic habitats. Earthworms play significant roles in the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil (Edwards and Arancon 2022). As permanently soil-dwelling animals, their activities affect soil properties and create suitable habitats for other smaller soil flora and fauna. Moreover, earthworms can be used as bioindicators of the relative health of soil ecological systems (Fründ et al. 2011). There are approximately 6,000 species that have been recorded worldwide, and the estimated total global species diversity exceeds 8,000 species (Edwards and Bohlen 1996; Fragoso et al. 1999; Jeratthitikul et al. 2017).

Earthworms are known to decompose organic waste from houses and agricultural farms. They can improve the soil property in ecosystems by producing vermicompost and vermicompost tea that including micro-organisms without pathogenic bacteria (Wongsaroj et al. 2021), as shown for Eisenia andrei Bouché, 1972, Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826), Dendrobaena veneta (Rosa, 1886), Perionyx excavatus Perrier, 1872, and Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg, 1867) species. All these five species are widely cultivated due to their tolerance to a wide range of environmental conditions and have short life cycles, high reproductive rates, and good composting rates (Domínguez 2018; Heuzé et al. 2020).

In addition, humans have long used earthworms as a healthy diet or for medication and as a source of feed for other animals (Edwards and Bohlen 1996). Earthworm meal has plenty of nutrients and enzymes, which can help break down food and repair body tissue (Paoletti et al. 2003; Grdiša et al. 2009, 2013; Iannucci et al. 2009; Bamidele et al. 2016; Sun and Jiang 2017; Musyoka et al. 2018) as in several countries, including Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Myanmar, Laos, India, Singapore, South America, North America, Papua New Guinea, Australia, New Zealand and China (Price 1901; Benham 1904; Gates 1926; Carr 1951; Reynolds and Reynolds 1972; Paoletti and Dreon 2005; Grdiša et al. 2009; Cooper et al. 2012a, b; Sun and Jiang 2017).

Economically, most of the dried earthworms from Sakon Nakhon and Nakhon Phanom, both in northeast Thailand, are exported to countries like Hong Kong, China, and Taiwan, where a large number of earthworms are consumed per year as part of traditional diet and medicine. This results in a high economic return for the villages of the mentioned provinces. At the end of the rainy season and the onset of the cold season from August to December, the villagers will go out at night and early in the morning, at approximately 2.00–5.00 a.m., to paddy fields, meadows, lowland areas, freshwater islands, or to lake shores to collect with their bare hands when fresh earthworms crawling on the soil surface. In the past, after villagers collected earthworms from the field, they would wash them in water and then rewash them in water-soaked with Burmese rosewood bark (Pterocarpus macrocarpus) to discard the mucus. The earthworms were then dissected from the anterior to the posterior and completely sun-dried before selling them to the middlemen. Nowadays, the locals sell the fresh earthworms to a middleman who lives in Ban Tan, Nakhon Phanom. This province is a popular marketplace for dried earthworms. The middleman is now responsible for dissecting the earthworms with a machine and drying them in the sun. The price of dried earthworms ranges from 450–750 Thai baht/kg (14–23 USD/kg as of this writing), and that for fresh earthworms ranges from 20–45 Thai baht/kg (0.59–1.3 USD/kg as of this writing) (Fig. 1). Because of the aforementioned importance of earthworms in agriculture, food, traditional medicine, and their economic value, there is a vital need to know about earthworm species, their behaviors, habitats, and distribution ranges, in order to assure their future conservation and sustainable use. However, although Thailand sells dried earthworms, none of the species have been identified. In this paper, we report on the earthworm species that Thai people sell, and all four species described herein were from northeast Thailand and are newly discovered.

Figure 1. 

Collecting earthworms in the early morning of the winter season A villagers in Sakon Nakhon collect the migratory earthworms with their bare hands B large numbers of caught earthworms being sold to middlemen C Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. from Akat Amnuai, Sakon Nakhon, moving on the soil during the migration season, and D dried earthworms.

Material and method

Earthworm specimens from Kong Ngong from Sakon Nakhon were collected with the villagers at approximately 2.00–5.00 a.m. by hand when earthworms were crawling on the soil surface during the cold season (November). Specimens from Nong Tuet and Wut Tham Kham from Sakon Nakhon and Ban Tan from Nakhon Phanom were collected by digging and hand-sorting. All earthworm specimens are from northeastern Thailand (Fig. 2). The collected specimens were washed and killed in 30% (v/v) ethanol before being photographed and then transferred to 95% (v/v) ethanol for preservation and subsequent morphological studies. The anatomical and morphological observations were made with an ACCU-SCOPE 3075 stereo microscope. Illustrations included the body segments, distinct external characters, and internal organs. The type series are deposited in Chulalongkorn University, Museum of Zoology, Bangkok, Thailand (CUMZ). Additional paratypes will be deposited in the Natural History Museum (NHMUK), London, and at the Biozentrum Grindel und Zoologisches Museum, University of Hamburg (ZMH). Specimens used in this study strictly followed the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Khon Kaen University (IACUC-KKU) under approval number IACUC-KKU-32/65.

Figure 2. 

Map of the collecting localities of the new species described in this paper from northeast Thailand. Filled circle: Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. from Kong Ngong, Akat Amnuai, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand. Filled triangular: Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. from Nong Tuet, Samakkee Pattana, Akat Amnuai, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand. Filled square: Amynthas auriculus sp. nov. from Wut Tham Kham, Phannanikom, Sakon Nakhon. Filled star: Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov. from Ban Tan, Nawah, Nakorn Phanom, Thailand.

The following abbreviation used in the figures of the anatomy are as appeared in Bantaowong et al. (2011a, b): sp, spermathecal pores; fp, female pore; gm, genital markings; mp, male pores; sc, spermathecae; sv, seminal vesicles; pg, prostate gland; ic, intestinal caeca.

Taxonomy

Family Megascolecidae Rosa, 1891

Genus Metaphire Sims & Easton, 1972

Metaphire songkhramensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov.

Figs 1C, 3D, 4, Table 1

Type material

Holotype : Adult specimen (CUMZ 3821), Kong Ngong, Akat Amnuai, Sakon Nakhon, northeast of Thailand, 17°45'19.4"N, 104°01'18.8"E, 148 m a.m.s.l., 8 November 2022, coll. R. Chanabun, A. Aoonkum. Paratypes: 45 adults (CUMZ 3822), 2 adults (NHMUK), 2 adults (ZMH), same collection data as for holotype.

Figure 3. 

Photographs showing the A type locality of Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. from Kong Ngong, Akat Amnuai, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand B habitat of the new species covered with small bamboo and small shrubs C casts of the new species, and D coloration of newly collected paratype (CUMZ 3822) after the first preservation step in 30% (v/v) ethanol.

Diagnosis

Large sized; length 229–427 mm, diameter 10–14 mm, 129–240 segments. Male pores paired in segment XVIII, each represented by a large invaginated area, conspicuous, deep holes that resemble eyes, genital markings absent. Spermathecal pores paired in intersegment 6/7–8/9. Spermathecae with large, round, and flat ampulla, with a long and thick duct, diverticulum thin, long, and zigzagged towards the distal end. No nephridia on the spermathecal duct. Holandric. Intestinal caeca simple. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Prostate gland large in XV–XXII, long, slender with U-shape duct, large paired of glandular masses on the copulatory sac, no genital marking glands.

Figure 4. 

External and internal morphology of Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 3821) A external ventral view B internal dorsal view, and C spermatheca with location of spermathecal pore arrowed.

Description of holotype

Length 333 mm, diameter 12 mm, cylindrical body with 167 segments. Preserved specimens are dark brownish on the dorsal part and pale gray on the ventral part. Setae regularly distributed around segmental equators, numbering 65 at segment VII, 85 at segment XX, and nine between male pores at segment XVIII. Setal formula AA:AB:ZZ:ZY=1:1:2:1 at segment XIII. Single female pore on the ventral side at segment XIV. Prostomium epilobic. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Clitellum annular in XIV–XVI with no dorsal pores or setae.

Male pores in copulatory pouches that have wrinkled and convex margins on ventrolateral sides of segment XVIII; pouches 5 mm apart, which is 0.13× the body circumference. These pores are large, conspicuous, deep holes that resemble eyes. There is no skin folding, and genital markings absent. Large spermathecal pores arranged in three pairs in ventral region 6/7–8/9, distance between each pair is ~ 0.26× the body circumference ventrally apart. There are no genital markings in this area.

The septa at 5/6–7/8 thick, absent in 8/9–9/10, slightly thick in 10/11–11/12, thin in 12/13–14/15, and very thin behind 15/16. Intestine begins at segment XV. Gizzard large within IX–X. Long and simple intestinal caeca in XXVII–XIX. Esophageal hearts four pairs in X–XIII. Holandric; testes and funnels in segments X and XI. Seminal vesicles are paired, one at XI–XII, the other at XIII–XIV; the hindmost pair is larger. Prostate glands large, located in segments XV–XXII, and divided into several lobules. Prostate duct long, slender with U-shape, and with large paired glandular masses on the copulatory sac at segments XVII–XVIII and XIX–XX.

The ovaries are located in segment XIII. Three pairs of spermathecae present on VII–IX. Ampulla large, round, and flat-shaped, with long and thick duct that can be clearly seen from the ampulla. Diverticulum is thin, long, and zigzagged towards the distal end.

Variation

Forty-nine paratypes ranged in size from 229–427 mm (318.75 ± 40.32 mm) body length with 129–240 (159.29 ± 19.77) segments.

Etymology

This new species was named after its type locality, Songkhram River.

Distribution

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks

Metaphire songkhramensis is a new species of sexthecal earthworm without postclitellar genital markings. It has three pairs of spermathecal pores in intersegmental furrows 6/7–8/9. This species keys to the houlleti species group, which has more than 40 species (Sims and Easton 1972). Below, comparison of the new species with other species found in different regions in the houlleti species group: M. umbraticola (Gates, 1932) and M. quadrigemina (Gates, 1932) from Myanmar, M. amplectens (Michaelsen, 1934), M. dawydovi (Michaelsen, 1934), M. acampanulata Nguyen, 2022 from Vietnam (Nguyen et al. 2022), M. bindjeyensis (Michaelsen, 1899) from Sumatra, and M. hijauensis Ng & Panha, 2018 from Malysia (Ng et al. 2018) are stated.

Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. differs from M. umbraticola and M. quadrigemina from Myanmar by having smaller size than the new species. Metaphire umbraticola which has a body size that ranges from 115–122 mm, a diameter of 6–7 mm, with 125–135 segments, M. quadrigemina which has a size that ranges from 64–72 mm by 3–4 mm, with 115, while the new species ranges from 229–427 mm, a diameter of 10–14 mm, with 129–240 segments.

Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. differs from M. amplectens, M. dawydovi, and M. acampanulata from Vietnam through the body size and spermathecae. Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. differs from M. amplectens by M. amplectens has a smaller body size than the new species (body length 44–52 mm, diameter 2½–3½ mm with 90–112 segments). Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. differs from M. dawydovi in that M. dawydovi has a smaller size (body length 275 mm, diameter 7 mm, with 160 segments), and flask-shaped ampullae with small diverticulum, whereas the new species has a larger body size with large, round, and flat-shaped ampullae with thin, long, and zigzag diverticulum. Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. differs from M. acampanulata from Vietnam in body size and spermathecae; the latter has a smaller size than the new species (body length 77–198 mm, diameter 4.03–6.91 mm with 56–144 segments), and ampulla mushroom-shaped with grooves on the surface while the new species has a larger size and has large, round, and flat-shaped of ampulla.

Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. similar to M. bindjeyensis from Sumatra in body size length but M. bindjeyensis obclavate ampullae with zigzag diverticulum, while the new species has a large, round, and flat-shaped ampulla with a thin, long, and zigzagged diverticulum. Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. differs from M. hijauensis from Malysia by the latter species has a smaller size than the new species (body size range 66–87 mm, diameter of 2.8–3.1 mm, with 101–120 segments), and the first dorsal pores in 10/11 while the new species has first dorsal pores in 12/13.

In Thailand, five species have been reported, M. houlleti (Perrier, 1872), M. virgo (Beddard, 1900), M. perichaeta (Beddard, 1900), M. khaochamao Bantaowong & Panha, 2016, and M. khaoluangensis Bantaowong & Panha, 2016. Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from this group of five as follows: M. houlleti and M. virgo have first dorsal pores in 11/12 while the new species has first dorsal pores in 12/13, and a large, round, and flat-shaped ampulla with a thin, long, and zigzagged diverticulum (spherical and small sac in M. houlleti and M. virgo, respectively). The new species does not have the contorted diverticulum stalk enveloped in connective tissue as found in M. houlleti, and also lacks the typhlosole present in M. houlleti. Metaphire virgo has a spermathecal diverticulum stalk with multiple folds, while the new species is absent. Metaphire houlleti and M. virgo have genital markings bearing stalked glands in association with spermathecae and copulatory sacs, while the new species lacks them. This new species differs from M. perichaeta in that M. perichaeta has a smaller size, inverted pear-shaped spermathecae with coiled diverticulum, and the last hearts in XII (Beddard 1900; Stephenson 1932). Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. differs from M. khaochamao and M. khaoluangensis, through the male opening, body size, and spermathecae. Metaphire khaochamao has smaller body size (body size range 100–148 mm, with 110–120 segments), the male field including the lateral slits associated with the male pores, the absence of setae between male pores, and an elliptic ampulla with a short duct. Metaphire khaoluangensis has smaller body size (body size range 130–265 mm, with 113–131 segments), a secondary male opening with puckered margin, an elongate ampulla, and a sac-like duct, whereas the new species has a larger size with setae between male pore, a large, round, and flat-shaped ampulla, and a thin, long, and zigzag diverticulum. A comparison of characters between M. songkhramensis sp. nov. and other related species is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Morphological characteristics of the Metaphire houlleti species group in Thailand. The comma is used to separate body length and width. Data for M. khaoluangensis Bantaowong & Panha, 2016, M. khaochamao Bantaowong & Panha, 2016, and M. perichaeta (Beddard, 1900) are from Bantaowong et al. (2016), M. houlleti (Perrier, 1872) are from Gates (1972), and M. virgo (Beddard, 1900) are from Stephenson (1932).

Characters M. songkhramensis sp. nov. M. khaoluangensis M. khaochamao M. perichaeta M. virgo M. houlleti
Body length, width (mm) 229–427, 10–14 220, 10 166, 6 160, 5 152–157, 5 92–200, 4–7
Segment number 129–240 119 118 118 129 92–140
First dorsal pore 12/13 12/13 12/13 12/13 11/12 11/12
Spermathecae large, round, flattened elongate elliptic pear shape small large sac
Diverticulum thin, long slender slender zigzag tubular looped
Prostate gland XV–XXII XVI–XIX XVII–XXIII XVII–XIX XVII–XVIII XVI–XXI
Genital marking gland absent absent absent absent absent stalk
Copulatory sac present present absent present present present
Intestinal caeca XXVII–XIX XXVII–XXI XXVII–XXIII XXVII–XXIV XXVII–XXV XXVII–XXII
Type locality Thailand Thailand Thailand Thailand Thailand India

Genus Amynthas Kinberg, 1867

Amynthas sakonnakhonensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov.

Figs 5, 6, Tables 2, 5

Type material

Holotype : Adult specimen (CUMZ 3823), Nong Tuet, Samakkee Pattana, Akat Amnuai, Sakon Nakhon, northeast of Thailand, 17°40'54.1"N, 103°59'50.6"E, 149 m a.m.s.l., 6 October 2019, coll. R. Chanabun, A. Aoonkum. Paratypes: 25 adults (CUMZ 3824), 2 adults (NHMUK), 2 adults (ZMH), same collection data as for holotype.

Figure 5. 

Photographs showing the A type locality of Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. from Nong Tuet, Samakkee Pattana, Akat Amnuai, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand B living specimen under the stone near casts C coloration of a living paratype, and D coloration of a newly collected paratype (CUMZ 3824) after the first preservation step in 30% (v/v) ethanol.

Diagnosis

Medium-large size, length 134–238 mm, diameter 6–9 mm, 85–162 segments. Male pores paired in segment XVIII, each surrounded by four genital markings. Paired spermathecal pores in intersegments 6/7–8/9. Spermathecae large oval sacs of the ampulla, with stout and short duct, it is less than ampullar in length. Diverticulum long and zigzagged at the beginning and dilated towards the distal end, a baton-like chamber. Intestinal origin at XV. Intestinal caeca simple. Holandric. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Prostate glands large in segments XV–XXII, its ducts long and slender, surrounded by a large, long sessile glandular mass on the body wall.

Figure 6. 

External and internal morphology of Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 3823) A external ventral view B internal dorsal view, and C spermatheca with location of spermathecal pore arrowed.

Description of holotype

Length 217 mm, diameter 9 mm, body cylindrical with 156 segments. Preserved specimens are dark brownish on the dorsal part and pale gray on the ventral part. Setae regularly distributed around the segmental equators, numbering 49 at segment VII, 72 at segment XX, and 10 between male pores at segment XVIII. Setal formula is AA:AB:ZZ:ZY = 1:1:2:1 at XIII. Single female pore on the ventral side at segment XIV. Prostomium epilobic. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Clitellum annular in XIV–XVI with no dorsal pores or setae.

Male pores paired on the ventral side at XVIII, in a setal line ~ 5 mm and 0.18× the circumference apart ventrally. Male pores superficial, convex, and surrounded by four genital markings each. Large spermathecal pores three pairs in 6/7–8/9. The distance between each pair ~ 0.27× the circumference ventrally apart, with no genital markings on this area.

The septa at 5/6–7/8 thick, absent in 8/9–9/10, slightly thick in 10/11–11/12, thin in 12/13–14/15, and very thin behind 15/16. Gizzard large in IX–X. Intestine begins in segment XV. Long and simple intestinal caeca in XXVII–XXII. Esophageal hearts four pairs in segment X–XIII. Holandric; testes and funnels in X and XI. Seminal vesicles are paired, one in XI, the other one in XII–XIII. The prostate glands are well developed, located in XV–XXII, and divided into several lobules. The prostate duct is long and slender, surrounded by a large, long sessile glandular mass on the body wall on segments XVII–XIX.

Ovaries located in segment XIII. Three pairs of spermathecae present on VII–IX. Spermathecae large oval sacs of the ampulla, with stout and short duct, it is less than ampullar in length. Diverticulum long and zigzagged at the beginning and dilated towards the distal end, a baton-like chamber.

Variation

Twenty-nine paratypes range in body length from 134–238 mm (197.33 ± 24.52 mm), with 85–162 (142.96 ± 21.25) segments (Table 2).

Table 2.

Holotype and paratype dimensions and other morphological characteristics of Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov.

Characters Body length (mm) Number of segments Location of genital markings Number of genital markings First dorsal pore Prostate glands Intestinal caeca Genital marking gland
Holotype CUZM 3823 217 156 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXII present
Paratype CUMZ 3824
1 190 156 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
2 238 154 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
3 204 150 XVIII 4 12/13 XVI–XXII XXVII–XXII present
4 183 156 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXI XXVII–XXII present
5 172 154 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXII present
6 192 158 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
7 184 153 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXIII XXVII–XXI present
8 232 153 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
9 201 152 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXI XXVII–XXI present
10 217 157 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXIII XXVII–XXI present
11 144 110 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXIII XXVII–XXI present
12 134 85 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXII present
13 199 159 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
14 217 156 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
15 204 127 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
16 226 159 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
17 208 109 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
18 196 112 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXII present
19 212 156 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
20 191 158 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
21 166 112 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXI present
22 198 127 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXI XXVII–XXI present
23 176 121 XVIII 4 12/13 XVI–XXIII XXVII–XXI present
24 209 162 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XXII present
25 193 150 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXI XXVII–XXII present
26 225 158 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXI XXVII–XXI present

Etymology

The name sakonnakhonensis was derived from the province Sakon Nakhon.

Distribution

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks

Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. is sexthecal with spermathecal pores in 6/7–8/9. This species keyed to the sieboldi species group (Sims and Easton 1972). After that, Easton (1981) moved A. sieboldi (Horst, 1883) to the genus Metaphire. Then James et al. (2005) investigated and proposed the aelianus species group after A. aelianus (Rosa, 1892), to replace the sieboldi species group name (James et al. 2005; Bantaowong et al. 2014).

The aelianus species group consists of more than 60 species (Sims and Easton 1972; Tsai et al. 1999, 2010; Shen et al. 2003; James et al. 2005; Blakemore 2011; Bantaowong et al. 2014). In the following, we compared the new species with regional species in the aelianus species group: A. osmastoni (Michaelsen, 1907) from Myanmar, A. burchardi Michaelsen, 1899 from Sumatra, A. monsoonus James, Shih & Chang, 2005 and A. huangi James, Shih & Chang, 2005 from Taiwan (James et al. 2005).

Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. is similar to A. osmastoni from Myanmar and A. burchardi from Sumatra in the body size, but its easily distinguished by the new species having no median genital markings on segment VIII while A. osmastoni has them, the new species having no mid-ventral group of small circular papillae on segment XVIII while A. burchardi has them. Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from A. monsoonus and A. huangi from Taiwan in that the new species has a larger body size than these two species, A. monsoonus has genital markings in segments VII–IX. Amynthas monsoonus and A. huangi have no genital markings in the male pores region, whereas the new species contains these characters.

In Thailand, only four species within this species group have been reported from northeastern Thailand. These are A. fucosus (Gates, 1933), A. siam Blakemore, 2011, A. arenulus Bantaowong & Panha, 2014, A. longicaeca Bantaowong & Panha, 2014. Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. is easily distinguished from A. fucosus from Burma and A. siam from Thailand because these species have body diameters of 6 mm and 3 mm, respectively, while the new species are wider at ~ 8–10 mm. Amynthas fucosus has two pairs of genital markings at 17/18 and 18/19, and A. siam has a single pair between the male pores, while the new species has four genital markings surrounded by male pores. This new species differs from A. arenulus in that the latter has a larger size and lacks genital markings in the male pore area. Amynthas arenulus has a large transverse elliptical disc surrounded by an elevated rim with an indistinct male aperture located at the outer edge of each poropore, while the new species has four genital markings surrounding the male pore area. The new species has body dimensions similar to A. longicaeca but can be distinguished from A. longicaeca by the fact that A. longicaeca has small crescent-shaped genital markings in the male pore region and spermathecae consist of large oval ampullar with short duct, diverticulum has a small ovate knob and nephridia are present on diverticulum, while the new species has none of these characters.

Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. is similar to A. bantanensis sp. nov. in body size but can be distinguished by the A. sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. having large oval sacs of the ampulla, with stout and short duct, with long and zigzag diverticulum, and has large, long sessile glandular mass on the body wall region of XVII–XIX, as opposed to A. bantanensis sp. nov., which has elongated sacs of the ampulla with slender and long stalks, and has no such glandular mass. Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. differs from A. auriculus sp. nov. by the latter has a bit larger size, male pores located in between small three genital markings, each male pore region somewhat ear-shaped after fixation, and consists of a large, elongated ampullar with very short and zigzag diverticulum; however, A. sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. has four genital markings surrounding the male pore area, and has a large oval sacs of the ampulla, with long and zigzag diverticulum. Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. different genital marking pattern from the other new Amynthas species here, and the other related species is presented in Table 5.

Amynthas auriculus Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov.

Figs 7, 8, Tables 3, 5

Type material

Holotype : Adult specimen (CUMZ 3825) Wut Tham Kham, Phannanikom, Sakon Nakhon, northeast of Thailand, 17°13'06.2"N, 103°54'00.7"E, 403 m a.m.s.l., 9 October 2019, coll. R. Chanabun, A. Aoonkum. Paratypes: 2 adults (CUMZ 3826), 2 adults (NHMUK), same collection data as for holotype.

Figure 7. 

Photographs showing the A type locality of Amynthas auriculus sp. nov. from Wut Tham Kham, Phannanikom, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand B casts of the new species C coloration of a living paratype, and D coloration of a newly collected paratype (CUMZ 3826) after the first preservation step in 30% (v/v) ethanol.

Diagnosis

Medium-large size, length 184–267 mm, diameter 9–11 mm, 95–151 segments. Paired male pores at segment XVIII, surrounded by three genital papillae, each male pore region somewhat ear-shaped after fixation. Paired spermathecal pores in intersegments 6/7–8/9. Spermathecae are large, elongated sacs, with slender stalks of the ampulla, and diverticulum very short and zigzagged from its origin until the end. Holandric. Intestinal caeca simple. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Prostate glands large in XVI–XXIV, the prostate duct large, slender, smooth, and a bit zigzagged at the end, surrounded by a large sessile glandular mass on the body wall.

Figure 8. 

External and internal morphology of Amynthas auriculus sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 3825) A external ventral view B internal dorsal view, and C spermatheca with location of spermathecal pore arrowed.

Description of the holotype

Length 267 mm, diameter 10 mm, body cylindrical. 139 segments. Preserved specimens are dark brownish on the dorsal part and pale gray on the ventral part. Setae are regularly distributed around segmental equators, numbering 27 at segment VII, 62 at segment XX, and 20 between male pores at segment XVIII. Setal formula AA:AB:ZZ:ZY = 1:1:2:1 at XIII. At segment XIV, a single female pore mid-ventrally. Prostomium epilobic. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Clitellum annular in segments XIV–XVI with no dorsal pores or setae.

Male pores paired, superficial, convex, located on ventral side of segment XVIII, in between small genital markings; each male pore region somewhat ear-shaped after fixation in ethanol. Male pores ~ 7 mm apart, distance 0.29× the body circumference. Single female pore at XIV. At segment XVIII, each male pore is lined by two anterior genital markings above the setal line, and one posterior genital marking below the setal line. Spermathecal pores three pairs in 6/7–8/9, distance between each pair is ~ 0.37× the circumference ventrally, there are no genital markings in this area.

The septa are thick in 5/6–7/8; absent in 8/9–9/10; slightly thick in 10/11–11/12; thin in 12/13–14/15; and very thin behind 15/16. Gizzard large at IX–X. Intestine begins at segment XV. Long and simple intestinal caeca in XXVII–XXI. Esophageal hearts four pairs in segment X–XIII. Holandric; testes and funnels in X and XI. Seminal vesicles paired in XI–XII. Prostate glands divided into several lobules, in XVI–XXIV, large and well-developed. Prostate duct large, slender, smooth, and a bit zigzagged, surrounded by a large sessile glandular mass on the body wall on segments XVIII–XXI.

Ovaries in segment XIII. Three pairs spermathecae in VII–IX. Spermathecae large, elongated sacs with slender stalks of the ampulla, diverticulum very short and zigzagged from its origin until the end.

Variation

Four paratypes range in size from 184–224 mm (218.20 ± 30.80 mm) body length with 95–151 (128.40 ± 22.65) segments (Table 3).

Table 3.

Holotype and paratype dimensions and other morphological characteristics of Amynthas auriculus sp. nov.

Characters Body length (mm) Number of segments Location of genital markings Number of genital markings First dorsal pore Prostate glands Intestinal caeca Genital marking gland
Holotype CUZM 3825 267 139 XVIII 3 12/13 XVI–XXIV XXVII–XXI present
Paratype CUMZ 3826
1 224 151 XVIII 3 12/13 XV–XXV XXVII–XXI present
2 207 116 XVIII 3 12/13 XVI–XXIV XXVII–XXI present
3 209 141 XVIII 3 12/13 XVI–XXIV XXVII–XXI present
4 184 95 XVIII 3 12/13 XVI–XXIII XXVII–XXI present

Etymology

The species was named after the region of the male pore that looks like an ear after being preserved.

Distribution

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks

Amynthas auriculus sp. nov. belongs to the aelianus species group. This new species is quite similar to A. osmastoni from the South Andaman Islands and A. burchardi from Sumatra in the body dimensions but differs in having genital markings in the male pore area and having large sessile glandular masses on the body wall in XVIII–XXI, while A. osmastoni has genital markings in the spermathecal pores region without glandular masses on the body wall, and A. burchardi has a group of circular papillae in mid-ventral XVIII with no glandular masses on the body wall. Amynthas auriculus sp. nov. can be distinguished from A. monsoonus and A. huangi from Taiwan in which the new species has a larger body size, A. monsoonus has a body size of 102 mm, a diameter of 3.6 mm, with 83 segments and genital markings in segments VII–IX, while the new species is absent. Amynthas huangi has a body size of 70 mm, a diameter of 3.5 mm, with 101 segments, and genital marking glands in the body wall in VI–IX, while the new species has no such character. Amynthas monsoonus and A. huangi have no genital markings in the male pores region, whereas the new species is present.

Amynthas auriculus sp. nov. is easily distinguished from the other four earthworms of the aelianus species group reported from Thailand, namely A. fucosus from Myanmar, A. siam from Thailand, by its size and other physical traits. Amynthas fucosus has a body size range of 120 mm with a diameter of 6 mm and 114 segments, A. siam has a body size range of 73 mm, diameter of 3 mm, while the new species has a body size that ranges from 184–267 mm with a diameter of 9–11 mm, and 95–151 segments. Amynthas fucosus has two pairs of genital markings at 17/18, 18/19, and A. siam has single pair between the male pores, while the new species has three genital markings in the male pores. This new species differs from A. arenulus in that A. arenulus has no genital markings. In contrast, the new species has them at segment XVIII, near the male pores area. The new species is relatively similar to A. longicaeca in body size; however, A. longicaeca differs in that it has an oval ampulla, a small ovate knob with nephridia on the diverticulum, and also has a crescent-shaped male pore region (Table 5).

Amynthas bantanensis Chanabun & Panha, sp. nov.

Fig. 9, Tables 4, 5

Type material

Holotype : Adult specimen (CUMZ 3827) Ban Tan, Nawah, Nakhon Phanom, northeast of Thailand, 17°30'28.0"N, 104°05'48.0"E, 149 m a.m.s.l., 28 September 2018, coll. R. Chanabun, A. Aoonkum. Paratypes: 3 adults (CUMZ 3828), 2 adults (NHMUK); same collection data as for holotype.

Figure 9. 

External and internal morphology of Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 3827) A external ventral view B internal dorsal view, and C spermatheca with location of spermathecal pore arrowed.

Diagnosis

Medium-large size, length 159–213 mm, diameter 8–10 mm, 105–149 segments. Paired male pores in segment XVIII, surrounded by four genital papillae each. Paired spermathecal pores in intersegments 6/7–8/9. Spermathecae elongated sacs, with slender and long stalks of the ampulla, diverticulum slender, long at the beginning, zigzagged at the center, and slender towards the end. Holandric. Intestinal caeca are simple. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Prostate gland large and well developed in XVI–XXII; its duct is short, smooth and curled like a spiral.

Description of holotype

Length 191 mm, diameter 8 mm, body cylindrical, 127 segments. Preserved specimens are dark brownish on the dorsal part and pale gray on the ventral part. Setae are regularly distributed around the segmental equators, numbering 37 at segment VII, 57 at segment XX, and 12 between male pores at segment XVIII. Setal formula AA:AB:ZZ:ZY=1:1:2:1 at XIII. Single female pore mid-ventrally at segment XIV. Prostomium epilobic. First dorsal pore in 12/13. Clitellum annular in XIV–XVI with no dorsal pores or setae.

Male pores paired on the ventral side of XVIII, ~ 9 mm apart, distance 0.32× body circumference. Male pores superficial, convex, each surrounded by four genital markings. Spermathecal pores three pairs in 6/7–8/9. The distance between each pair is ~ 0.41× the body circumference ventrally apart. There are no genital markings in this area.

The septa in 5/6–7/8 thick, absent at 8/9–9/10, slightly thick in 10/11–11/12, thin in 12/13–14/15, and very thin behind 15/16. Gizzard large in IX. Intestine begins at segment XV. Vary long and simple intestinal caeca in XXVII–XIX. Esophageal hearts four pairs in segment X–XIII. Holandric; testes and funnels in X and XI. Seminal vesicles are paired, one in X–XI, the other one in XII–XIII. The prostate glands are large and well-developed, located in segments XVI–XXII and divided into several lobules. Prostate duct is relatively short, smooth, and spiraled.

Ovaries in segment XIII. Three pairs spermathecae in VII–IX. Spermathecae elongated sacs, with slender and long stalks of the ampulla, diverticulum slender, long at the beginning, zigzagged at the center, and slender towards the end.

Variation

Five paratypes range in size from 159–213 mm (183.83 ± 20.54 mm) body length with 105–149 segments (124 ± 14.39 mm) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Holotype and paratype dimensions and other morphological characteristics of Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov.

Characters Body length (mm) Number of segments Location of genital markings Number of genital markings First dorsal pore Prostate glands Intestinal caeca Genital marking gland
Holotype CUZM 3827 191 127 XVIII 4 12/13 XVI–XXII XXVII–XIX absent
Paratype CUMZ 3828
1 179 105 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XIX absent
2 213 149 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXIII XXVII–XIX absent
3 159 124 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XIX absent
4 164 119 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXII XXVII–XX absent
5 197 120 XVIII 4 12/13 XV–XXIII XXVII–XIX absent

Etymology

The name bantanensis is given to this species for its type locality at Ban Tan, Nawah, Nakhon Phanom.

Distribution

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks

Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov. is sexthecal with spermathecal pores in 6/7–8/9, belonging to the aelianus species group. The new species differs from other aelianus species group reported by body size, location of spermathecae and spermathecae, A. bantanensis sp. nov. is similar to A. burchardi from Sumatra, and A. osmastoni from the south Andaman Islands in body dimensions, but easily distinguished from A. burchardi which has a mid-ventral group of small circular papillae on segment XVIII, while they are absent in the new species. Amynthas osmastoni has genital markings at the pre-clitellum, which are absent in the new species. Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov. differs from A. monsoonus and A. huangi from Taiwan in that the new species has genital markings in the male pores region, whereas they are absent in A. monsoonus and A. huangi. Amynthas monsoonus has a smaller body size of 102 mm, a diameter of 3.6 mm, with 83 segments, and genital markings in segments VII–IX. Amynthas huangi has a smaller body size, a body range of 70 mm, a diameter of 3.5 mm, and 101 segments, and A. huangi has genital marking glands in the body wall in VI–IX, while the new species lacks them. The new species has genital markings in the male pores region, whereas they are absent in A. monsoonus and A. huangi.

Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov. differs from A. arenulus from Surin, Ubon Ratchathani, and Srisaket in that A. arenulus has a large transverse elliptical disc surrounded by an elevated rim with an indistinct male aperture located at the outer edge of each poropore and consists of a large sessile glandular mass on the body wall in this region, while the new species has genital markings at segment XVIII, near the male pore, but has no glandular mass on the body wall. Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov. is easily distinguished from A. fucosus from Burma and A. siam from Thailand because both previously reported species have smaller body sizes (A. fucosus = 6 mm, A. siam = 3 mm). Amynthas fucosus has two pairs of genital markings at 17/18, 18/19, and A. siam has a single pair between the male pores, while the new species has four genital markings surrounded by male pores at segment XVIII. The new species, Amynthas bantanensis, is similar body dimensions to A. longicaeca from Chaiyaphum, but is easily distinguished by A. longicaeca having crescent-shaped genital markings and a large sessile glandular mass on the body wall, while the new species lacks it. Considering the differences between A. bantanensis sp. nov., A. auriculus sp. nov., and A. sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. see the respective remarks sections above and Table 5.

Table 5.

Morphological characteristics of A. sakonnakhonensis sp. nov., A. auriculus sp. nov., A. bantanensis sp. nov., and other aelianus species in Thailand, Burma, Sumatra. The comma is used to separate body length and width. Missing data are shown with a question mark (?). Data for A. arenulus Bantaowong & Panha, 2014, A. longicaeca Bantaowong & Panha, 2014, A. burchardi Michaelsen, 1899, A. osmastoni (Michaelsen, 1907), and A. fucosus (Gates, 1933) are from Bantaowong et al. (2014), and A. siam Blakemore, 2011 is from Blakemore (2011).

Characters A. sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. A. auriculus sp. nov. A. bantanensis sp. nov. A. arenulus A. longicaeca A. burchardi A. osmastoni A. fucosus A. siam
Body length (mm), width (mm) 134–238, 6–9 184–267, 9–11 159–213, 8–10 465, 13.3 278, 10.1 270, 9 250–320, 10–11 120, 6 73, 3
Segment number 85–162 95–151 105–149 133–176 115–160 126 126–148 114 ?
First dorsal pore 12/13 12/13 12/13 12/13 12/13 13/14 12/13 12/13 12/13
Genital marking
Pre-clitellum absent absent absent absent absent absent median in VIII absent absent
Post-clitellum four genital markings at XVIII three genital markings at XVIII four genital markings at XVIII absent crescent shape mid-ventral group of small circular papillae on XVIII absent paired at 17/18, 18/19 pair at XVIII
Spermathecae large oval sac large elongated sacs elongate sac large sac oval oval spherical flatten spherical
Diverticulum long and zigzag, distal end a baton-like chamber short and zigzag slender, long, at the beginning, zigzag at the center and slender toward the end slender small ovate knob long slender tubular tubular and coiled convoluted
Prostate gland XV–XXII XVI–XXIV XVI–XXII XVII–XXII XVI–XXI XV–XX XV–XXIV XVII–XX ?
Intestinal caeca XXVII–XXII XXVII–XXI XXVII–XIX XXVII–XXIII XXVII–XXIV ? ? ? XXVII–?
Genital marking gland large, long sessile glandular mass on segment XVII–XIX large sessile glandular masses on segment XVIII–XXI absent large sessile glandular masses large sessile glandular masses absent absent absent slight sessile genital glands
Type locality Thailand Thailand Thailand Thailand Thailand Sumatra, Indonesia South Andaman Islands Myanmar Thailand

Discussion

The benefits of earthworms have led to a variety of uses, such for decomposing organic waste from agriculture and households, as well as to enhance soil qualities and structure (Alegre et al. 1996; Sharma et al. 2017) and produce the best compost for plant growth and organic farming systems (Rajiv et al. 2009). Moreover, earthworms are used as food for animals. In some local areas, they serve as human food and a component of herbal medicine since the earthworm’s tissue is rich in nutrients and enzymes that are very good for health (Grdiša et al. 2013; Sun and Jiang 2017), as mentioned in the introduction section.

In this paper, four new earthworm species are reported: one species of genus Metaphire and three species of genus Amynthas, of which three species were collected by locals and dried for sale (Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. from Sakon Nakhon, Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. from Sakon Nakhon, and Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov. from Nakhon Phanom). Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. belongs to the houlleti species group. This new species has the longest and widest body size among the houlleti groups reported in Thailand. Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov., A. auriculus sp. nov., and A. bantanensis sp. nov. are classified in the aelianus species group. All of these new species were reported from northeast Thailand and collected from different habitat types.

Metaphire songkhramensis sp. nov. lives in the dark clay soil of the oxbow lake of the Songkhram River, which locals call Kud Klong Ngong. This habitat is covered with plenty of earthworm casts and with mainly small bamboo (Bambusa sp., Bambusa arundinacae Wild.), small shrubs (Hymenocardia wallichii Tul. and Euryeoma longifolia Jack.), and trees (Syzygium cumini L. and Lagerstroemia calyculata Kurz.). The earthworms move around on the soil, but, interestingly, all of them are the same species.

On the other hand, Nong Tuet, Sakon Nakon, from where Amynthas sakonnakhonensis sp. nov. was found, is a wetland. Water will flood in the rainy season and be covered by grass in the dry season. Villagers in the area use it as a pasture for livestock, such as cows and buffaloes. This habitat’s soil is a mixture of clay and tiny pebbles, and the land could not be utilized for cultivation because shrubs predominate the area. The authors found that the new species of earthworms inhibit this area together with M. peguana (Rasa, 1890) and Drawida sp.

Amynthas auriculus sp. nov. lives in dark sandy loam soil covered with a mixed deciduous forest at Wut Tham-kham, Sakon Nakon. This area is a fertile forest of the Phu Phan Mountain range. Contrastingly, Amynthas bantanensis sp. nov. lives in the sandy loam of the soil covered with casts. This species was collected early in the morning from the field where rice and other economic plants are cultivated.

Furthermore, after interviewing the locals, the authors learned that every August to December of the year, from the end of the rainy and cold seasons (temperature ranges from 16–22.9 °C), earthworms come out from the soil at approximately 2:00–5:00 a.m. At this time the locals collect them for sale. If the weather is excellent, 30–80 kg/person of earthworms can be collected, but if it is otherwise rainy, very cold, or windy, the earthworms do not come out. Moreover, these earthworms also choose to stay underground during the full moon.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Mr. Ali Flores Maluya for English proofreading. Also, the authors extend gratitude to Thita Krutchuen for the excellent drawings and to all members of Biodiversity and Utilization Research Unit of Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University for assistance in the collection of the materials.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was declared.

Ethical statement

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers): Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Khon Kaen University (IACUC-KKU) under approval number IACUC-KKU-32/65 approved the study.

Funding

This research and innovation activity is funded by National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (N35E660138), and Centre of Excellence on Biodiversity (MHESI) (BDC-PG1-166004), and Biodiversity-Based Economy Development Office (11/2019).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: RC. Resources: RC, AA, TS, UB. Writing – original draft: RC. Writing – review and editing: RC, AA, SP.

Author ORCIDs

Ratmanee Chanabun https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-2773

Anuwat Aoonkum https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3895-9570

Teerapong Seesamut https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9589-8641

Ueangfa Bantaowong https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6068-7930

Somsak Panha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-2458

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Bamidele JA, Idowu AB, Ademolu KO, Bankole SO (2016) Diversity, abundance, and tissue mineral composition of indigenous earthworm species of sawmills of Abeokuta, south-western Nigeria. Munis Entomology and Zoology Journal 11: 63–67.
  • Bantaowong U, Chanabun R, Tongkerd P, Sutcharit C, James SW, Panha S (2011a) New earthworms species of the genus Amynthas Kinberg, 1867 from Thailand (Clitellata, Oligochaeta). ZooKeys 90: 35–62. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.90.1121
  • Bantaowong U, Chanbun R, Tongkerd P, Sutcharit C, James SW, Panha S (2011b) A new species of the terrestrial earthworm of the genus Metaphire Sims and Easton, 1972 from Thailand with redescription of some species. Tropical Natural History 11(1): 55–69.
  • Bantaowong B, Somniyam P, Sutcharit C, James SW, Panha S (2014) Four new species of the earthworm genus Amynthas Kinberg, 1867, with redescription of the type species (Clitellata: Megascolecidae). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 62: 655–670.
  • Bantaowong B, Chanabun R, James SW, Panha S (2016) Seven new species of the earthworm genus Metaphire Sims and Easton, 1972 from Thailand (Clitellata: Megascolecidae). Zootaxa 4117(1): 063–084. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4117.1.3
  • Beddard FE (1900) On a new species of earthworm from India belonging to the genus Amynthas. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1900: 998–1002.
  • Blakemore RJ (2011) Description of a new Amynthas earthworm (Megascolecidae sensu stricto) from Thailand. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Series A 37: 9–13.
  • Carr LGK (1951) Interesting animal foods, medicines, and omens of the eastern Indians, with comparisons to ancient European practices. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 41: 229–235.
  • Cooper EL, Balamurugan M, Huang C-Y, Tsao CR, Heredia J, Tommaseo-Ponzetta M, Paoletti MG (2012a) Earthworms Dilong: Ancient, inexpensive, noncontroversial models may help clarify approaches to integrated medicine emphasizing neuroimmune systems. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/164152
  • Easton EG (1981) Japanese earthworms: a synopsis of Megadrile species. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology 40: 33–65.
  • Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) Biology and Ecology of Earthworms (3rd edn.). Chapman and Hall, London, 426 pp.
  • Fragoso C, Kanyonyo J, Moreno A, Senapati BK, Blanchart E, Rodriguez C (1999) A survey of tropical earthworms: taxonomy, biogeography, and environmental plasticity. In: Lavelle P, Brussaard L, Hendrix P (Eds) Earthworm Management in Tropical Agroecosystems, CABI Publishing, New York, 26 pp.
  • Fründ HC, Graefe U, Tischer S (2011) Earthworms as bioindicators of soil quality. In: Karaca A (Ed.) Biology of Earthworms. Soil Biology, vol 24. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14636-7_16
  • Gates GE (1926) The earthworms of Rangoon. Journal of the Burma Research Society 25: 196–221.
  • Gates GE (1972) Burmese earthworms, an introduction to the systematics and biology of megadrile oligochaetes with special reference to the Southeast Asia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 62(7): 1–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/1006214
  • Grdiša M, Mikecin A-M, Kneževi N (2009) Fibrinolytic enzymes from earthworms. Dynamic Soil, Dynamic Plant 3(2): 61–63.
  • Grdiša M, Gršićb K, Grdišac MD (2013) Earthworms – role in soil fertility to the use in medicine and as a food. Information Systems Journal 10: 38–45.
  • Iannucci NB, Camperi SA, Cascone O (2009) Purification of enzymes from earthworms. Dynamic Soil, Dynamic Plant 3(2): 64–68.
  • James SW, Shih HT, Chang HW (2005) Seven new species of Amynthas (Clitellata: Megascolecidae) and new earthworm record from Taiwan. Journal of Natural History 39(14): 1007–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930400001434
  • Jeratthitikul E, Bantaowong U, Panha S (2017) DNA barcoding of the Thai species of terrestrial earthworms in the genera Amynthas and Metaphire (Haplotaxida: Megascolecidae). European Journal of Soil Biology 81: 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.06.004
  • Michaelsen W (1899b) Terricolen von verschiednen Gebieten der Erde. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten 16: 1–122.
  • Michaelsen W (1907) Neue Oligochaten von Vorder-Indien, Ceylon, Birma und den Andaman-Inseln. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten 24: 143–188.
  • Michaelsen W (1934) Oligochaeten von FranzÖsisch-Indochina. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 76: 493–546.
  • Musyoka SN, Liti DM, Ogello E, Waidbacher H (2018) Utilization of the earthworm, Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826) as an alternative protein source in fish feed processing: A review. Aquaculture Research 50(9): 2301–2315. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14091
  • Ng B, Bantaowong U, Tongkerd P, Panha S (2018) Description of two new species of earthworms genus Metaphire (Clitellata: Megascolecidae) from Kedah, Peninsular Malaysia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 66: 132–141.
  • Nguyen TT, Vanly V, Lam D, Nguyen TV, Nguyen AD (2022) A new earthworms species of the genus Metaphire Sims and Easton, 1972 (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) from Southern Vietnam. Tropical Natural History 22: 72–84.
  • Paoletti MG, Dreon AL (2005) Minilivestock, Environment, Sustainability, and Ocal Knowledge Disappearance. Ecological implications of minilivestock Potential of Insects, Rodents, Frogs and Sails. United States of America, 18 pp.
  • Paoletti MG, Buscardo E, VanderJagt DJ, Pastuszyn A, Pizzoferrato L, Huang YS, Chuang LT, Millson M, Cerda H, Torres F, Glew RH (2003) Nutrient content of earthworms consumed by Ye’Kuana Amerindians of the Alto Orinoco of Venezuela. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 270(1512): 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2141
  • Rajiv S, Sunil H, Dalsukhbhai V, Krunalkumar C (2009) Earthworms vermicompost: a powerful crop nutrient over the conventional compost and protective soil conditioner against the destructive chemical fertilizers for food safety and security. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 5(S): 01–55. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/30336
  • Shen HP, Tsai CF, Tsai SC (2003) Six new earthworms of the genus Amynthas (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) from central Taiwan. Zoological Studies 42: 479–490.
  • Sims RW, Easton EG (1972) A numerical revision of the earthworm genus Pheretima (Megascolecidac: Oligochaeta) with the recognition of new genera and an appendix on the earthworms collected by the Royal Society North Borneo Expedition. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 4(3): 169–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1972.tb00694.x
  • Stephenson J (1932) A re-examination of certain Oligochaeta from the Malay Peninsula (Skeat Expedition, 1899–1900). Annals & Magazine of Natural History 9(51): 201–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933208673494
  • Tsai CF, Shen HP, Tsai SC (1999) On some new species of the pheretimoid earthworms (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) from Taiwan. Journal of the National Taiwan Museum 52: 33–46.
  • Tsai CF, Shen HP, Tsai SC (2010) Four new species of Amynthas earthworms (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) from the Central Mountain Range of southern Taiwan. Journal of Natural History 44(21–22): 1251–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222931003624788
  • Wongsaroj L, Chanabun R, Tunsakul N, Prombutara P, Panha S, Somboonna N (2021) First reported quantitative microbiota in different livestock manures used as organic fertilizers in the Northeast of Thailand. Scientific Reports 11(1): e102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80543-3
login to comment