Research Article
Print
Research Article
Notes on twelve species of jumping spiders from Hainan Island, China (Araneae, Salticidae)
expand article infoCheng Wang§, Shuqiang Li|
‡ Tongren University, Tongren, China
§ Hainan Normal University, Haikou, China
| Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Three new genera and eleven new species are reported from Hainan Island, China. The new genera are Logunattus gen. nov., including L. dufui sp. nov. (♂), and the generotype L. libaii sp. nov. (♂♀), Qiongattus yuanyeae gen. et sp. nov. (♂♀), and Spiralembolus gen. nov., including the generotype S. yinggeling sp. nov. (♂♀), and S. yui sp. nov. (♂♀). Another six new species are Carrhotus qingzhaoae sp. nov. (♂♀), Gedea liangweii sp. nov. (♂♀), Heliophanoides moi sp. nov. (♂), Indopadilla songi sp. nov. (♂♀), Myrmarachne mixiaoqii sp. nov. (♂♀), and Nandicius shihaitaoi sp. nov. (♂♀). The unknown female of the endemic species, Pancorius hainanensis Song & Chai, 1991 is also described for the first time. Diagnostic photos of these species are provided.

Key words

Morphology, new taxa, salticid, southern China, taxonomy

Introduction

Hainan, the second-largest Chinese Island, has presented very high species diversity (Tang and Li 2010). As in most Chinese regions, the taxonomic study of jumping spiders from this island began at the end of the 20th century (Song et al. 1988), but knowledge has rapidly increased in the last more than three decades, with the series of taxonomic studies and biodiversity surveys conducted (Song et al. 1988; Song 1991; Song and Chai 1991; Peng and Kim 1997; Song and Zhu 1998; Zhang and Li 2005; Peng and Li 2006; Guo 2011; Guo et al. 2011a, b; Barrion et al. 2013; Zhou and Li 2013; Xu et al. 2021; Wang and Li 2022b; Yu et al. 2022). To date, at least 123 salticid species including 47 endemics have been recorded from Hainan (Metzner 2023; Wang and Li 2022b; WSC 2023). However, there is no doubt that the true diversity of jumping spiders from this island remains insufficiently known, and numerous new species or newly recorded species will continue being discovered with further taxonomic studies and broad surveys. Moreover, like the worldwide current situation, the taxonomic study of jumping spiders from this island is also plagued by high rates of taxa known from a single-sex and some poorly known species lacking diagnostic drawings (Wang and Li 2022b).

The present work is the result of an ongoing taxonomic study of Hainan’s jumping spider specimens deposited at the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (IZCAS), China, and Tongren University (TRU) in Tongren, China. Eleven species belonging to nine genera (including three new genera) are recognized as new to science. The unknown female of Pancorius hainanensis Song & Chai, 1991 was also found and is described herein for the first time.

Materials and methods

Specimens were collected by beating shrubs, sieving, or hand collecting in the tropical rainforest of Hainan Island, China. They were preserved in 75% ethanol for morphological study. Specimens are deposited at the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (IZCAS), China, and Tongren University (TRU) in Tongren, China. Methods follow those of Wang and Li (2021). All measurements are given in millimetres. Leg measurements are given as total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). References to figures in the cited papers are listed in lowercase type (fig. or figs), and figures in this paper are noted with an initial capital (Fig. or Figs).

Abbreviations used in the text and figures are as follows: ALE anterior lateral eye; AME anterior median eye; AERW anterior eye row width; AG accessory gland; AR atrial ridge; AS anterior chamber of spermatheca; At atrium; BG Bennett’s gland; BP basal epigynal plate; CA cymbial apophysis; CD copulatory duct; CO copulatory opening; DTA dorsal tibial apophysis; E embolus; EFL eye field length; FD fertilization duct; H epigynal hood; LP lamellar process; MS median septum; PERW posterior eye row width; PL posterior lobe; PLE posterior lateral eye; PS posterior chamber of spermatheca; bRTA baso-retrolateral tibial apophysis; dRTA dorso-retrolateral tibial apophysis; RTA retrolateral tibial apophysis; S spermatheca; SD sperm duct; SH spermathecal head; TB tegular bump.

Institutional abbreviations: IZCAS Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; TRU Tongren University.

Taxonomy

Family Salticidae Blackwall, 1841

Genus Carrhotus Thorell, 1891

Carrhotus qingzhaoae sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2

Type material

Holotype ♂ (TRU-JS 0682), China: Hainan: Ledong County, Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Peak Mountain (18°43.11′N, 108°52.32′E, ca. 1400 m), 17.iv.2019, C. Wang & Y.F. Yang leg. Paratypes 1♂2♀ (TRU-JS 0683–0685), same data as holotype.

Etymology

The specific name is after Mrs. Qingzhao Li (1084–1155), the most outstanding female writer in the history of Chinese literature; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

The male of Carrhotus qingzhaoae sp. nov. resembles that of C. atratus Satkunanathan & Benjamin, 2022 in the general shape of palp, but differs in: (1) the embolus being narrower than 1/5 the bulb width in ventral view (Fig. 1B), vs. ~ 1/3 the bulb width in C. atratus (Satkunanathan and Benjamin 2022: fig. 7C); (2) the RTA is straight and tapered in retrolateral view (Fig. 1C), vs. slightly curved and acutely narrowed distally in C. atratus (Satkunanathan and Benjamin 2022: figs 6F, 7D). The female resembles that of C. samchiensis Jastrzębski, 1999 in having very similar epigyne, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: (1) the copulatory openings are located posteriorly (Fig. 2A), vs. located anteromedially in C. samchiensis (Jastrzębski 1999: fig. 20); (2) the copulatory ducts are greater than spermathecal width in length (Fig. 2B), vs. ca. the equal in length to spermathecal width in C. samchiensis (Jastrzębski 1999: fig. 21).

Figure 1. 

Male palp of Carrhotus qingzhaoae sp. nov., holotype A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 2. 

Carrhotus qingzhaoae sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D ditto, ventral E female paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A, B, G); 0.5 mm (C–F).

Description

Male (Figs 1, 2C, D, F, G). Total length 5.03. Carapace 2.46 long, 2.03 wide. Abdomen 2.43 long, 1.60 wide. Clypeus 0.12 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.53, ALE 0.30, PLE 0.28, AERW 1.83, PERW 1.93, EFL 1.07. Legs: I 5.31 (1.55, 0.90, 1.25, 0.93, 0.68), II 4.83 (1.50, 0.85, 1.10, 0.83, 0.55), III 5.39 (1.65, 0.88, 1.23, 1.00, 0.63), IV 5.47 (1.60, 0.88, 1.28, 1.13, 0.58). Carapace red-brown to dark brown, covered with dense white setae on the later sides of thorax, and clypeus; fovea dark, linear, longitudinal. Chelicerae red-brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites pale to yellow, setose, widened distally. Labium red-brown to dark brown, with pale anterior margin. Sternum red-brown, covered with long white setae. Legs dark yellow to brown, setose and spinous. Abdomen almost oval, dorsum violet-brown, covered with dense, anterior, and lateral long setae, and covered by elliptical scutum extending from anterior 1/5 to the terminus and ca. half the abdomen width; venter grey to brown, setose. Palp (Fig. 1A–C). Tibia slightly longer than wide, with straight, tapered RTA directed towards ~ 11:00 o’clock position apically in retrolateral view; cymbium ~ 2× longer than wide in ventral view, with thin setae of various lengths; bulb elongated, with well-developed posterior lobe extending postero-prolaterally; embolus short, tapered, originates from the apical portion of bulb, curved towards prolateral side medially, with rather pointed tip.

Female (Fig. 2A, B, E). Total length 5.49. Carapace 2.78 long, 2.41 wide. Abdomen 2.74 long, 2.07 wide. Clypeus 0.13 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.55, ALE 0.33, PLE 0.30, AERW 2.15, PERW 2.33, EFL 1.33. Legs: I 5.10 (1.60, 1.00, 1.20, 0.70, 0.60), II 4.81 (1.58, 0.88, 1.00, 0.75, 0.60), III 5.71 (1.80, 1.00, 1.23, 1.05, 0.63), IV 5.87 (1.83, 0.98, 1.25, 1.18, 0.63). Carapace similar to that of male, except paler, covered with dense yellow setae and sparse dark, long setae, without white setae on the lateral of thorax, and clypeus. Abdomen oval, dorsum yellow to brown, setose, with yellow, dark markings of setae. Epigyne (Fig. 2A, B). Wider than long, with arc-shaped basal plate almost as wide as epigyne; copulatory openings posteriorly located, separated from each other less than their width; copulatory ducts thin, paralleled extending anteromedially and followed by ~ 110° curves, and connected to the anterior portions of spermathecae distally; spermathecae irregular, separated from each other less than 1/6 their width.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Genus Gedea Simon, 1902

Gedea liangweii sp. nov.

Figs 3, 4

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44497), China: Hainan: Ledong County, Jianfengling National Nature Reserve (18°44.73′N, 108°49.63′E, ca. 1240 m), 17.viii.2010, G. Tang leg. Paratypes 1♂1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44498–44499), same data as holotype; 1♂ (IZCAS-Ar44500), Jianfeng Botanical Garden (18°44.27′N, 108°51.50′E, ca. 910 m), 28.iv.2009, G. Tang leg.; 1♂ (IZCAS-Ar44501), Wuzhishan City, Wuzhishan National Nature Reserve, 7.viii.2007, C.X. Wang leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after Prof. Liang Wei from Hainan Normal University, China; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

Gedea liangweii sp. nov. closely resembles that of G. daoxianensis Song & Gong, 1992 in having very similar habitus and copulatory organs, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: (1) the DTA bears six digitiform apophyses distally in retrolateral view (Fig. 3C), vs. several long setae-like apophyses in G. daoxianensis (Song and Gong 1992: fig. 6); (2) the copulatory openings are anteriorly located (Fig. 4A), vs. posteriorly located in G. daoxianensis (Song and Gong 1992: fig. 3); (3) the copulatory ducts are curved ~ 180° medially (Fig. 4B), vs. curved ~ 100° in G. daoxianensis (Song and Gong 1992: fig. 4).

Figure 3. 

Male palp of Gedea liangweii sp. nov., holotype A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 4. 

Gedea liangweii sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D ditto, ventral E female paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A, B, G); 0.5 mm (C–F).

Description

Male (Figs 3, 4C, D, F, G). Total length 3.26. Carapace 1.72 long, 1.35 wide. Abdomen 1.57 long, 1.20 wide. Clypeus 0.07 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.37, ALE 0.26, PLE 0.21, AERW 1.24, PERW 1.11, EFL 0.80. Legs: I 3.48 (0.95, 0.65, 0.85, 0.63, 0.40), II 2.91 (0.90, 0.50, 0.63, 0.50, 0.38), III 3.33 (1.10, 0.50, 0.63, 0.70, 0.40), IV 3.23 (1.00, 0.43, 0.65, 0.75, 0.40). Carapace red-brown to dark brown, covered with dense yellow and white setae, with pair of indistinct, dark patches medially on eye field; fovea linear, longitudinal, dark. Chelicerae yellow, each with four promarginal teeth and one retromarginal fissidental tooth with four cusps. Endites paler than chelicerae, with sub-triangular distal processes extending laterally. Labium almost linguiform, bearing several dark setae at anterior margin. Sternum slightly longer than wide, with straight anterior margin, covered with paler thin setae. Legs yellow to brown, spinous. Abdomen elongate-oval, dorsum with two pairs of muscle depressions anteromedially and alternate dark brown and pale yellow transverse bands; venter pale-yellow to grey. Palp (Fig. 3A–C). Tibia wider than long, with curved, tapered RTA coiled into a circle distally in retrolateral view, and platelike DTA bearing six digitiform apophyses at distal end; cymbium almost two times longer than wide; bulb swollen, with well-developed posterior lobe extending downward; embolus strongly sclerotized, tapered, and curved, originates from antero-prolateral portion of bulb, with rather pointed tip.

Female (Fig. 4A, B, E). Total length 3.73. Carapace 1.59 long, 1.22 wide. Abdomen 1.91 long, 1.35 wide. Clypeus 0.08 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.35, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.12, PERW 1.02, EFL 0.73. Legs: I 2.53 (0.78, 0.50, 0.55, 0.40, 0.30), II 2.43 (0.75, 0.48, 0.50, 0.40, 0.30), III 3.04 (1.00, 0.50, 0.58, 0.63, 0.33), IV 2.99 (0.90, 0.43, 0.65, 0.68, 0.33). Habitus (Fig. 4E) similar to that of male except darker, and with a more slender body. Epigyne (Fig. 4A, B). Wider than long, with pair of small, posterolateral hoods; copulatory openings anteriorly located, almost round, separated from each other ca. their diameter; copulatory ducts thick, strongly curved ~ 180° medially; spermathecae almost elliptical, separated from each other more than their width; fertilization ducts originate from the inner of anterior portions of spermathecae, extending almost transversely.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Province.

Genus Heliophanoides Prószyński, 1992

Heliophanoides moi sp. nov.

Fig. 5

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44502), China: Hainan: Ledong County, Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Wufenqu (18°44.03′N, 108°55.46′E, ca. 960 m), 15.viii.2010, G. Zheng leg. Paratypes 1♂ (TRU-JS 0686), Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Peak Mountain (18°43.11′N, 108°52.32′E, ca. 1400 m), 22.iii.2023, Yunhu Mo leg.; 2♂ (IZCAS-Ar44503–44504), Lingshui County, Diaoluoshan National Nature Reserve, Direction of the Mysterious Tree (18°43.50′N, 108°52.10′E, ca. 920 m), 18.iv.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after Mr. Yunhu Mo, one of the collectors of the type specimens; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

Heliophanoides moi sp. nov. resembles that of Phintella tengchongensis Lei & Peng, 2013 in having similar palp structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the RTA, which is extending anteroventrally, and slightly less than tibia length in retrolateral view (Fig. 5C), vs. extending anteriorly, and ~ 1.5× longer than tibia in P. tengchongensis (Lei and Peng 2013: fig. 8b). It also somewhat resembles that of Echinussa imerinensis Simon, 1901 in the general shape of palpal structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the tapered RTA, which does not extend ventrally beyond the bulb prolateral margin in retrolateral view (Fig. 5C), vs. the RTA narrowest medio-posteriorly, and extends beyond the bulb prolateral margin in E. imerinensis (see the figure in Prószyński 1987).

Figure 5. 

Male of Heliophanoides moi sp. nov., holotype A palp, prolateral B ditto, ventral C ditto, retrolateral D habitus, dorsal E ditto, ventral F carapace, frontal G chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–C, G); 0.5 mm (D–F).

Description

Male (Fig. 5). Total length 4.70. Carapace 2.03 long, 1.73 wide. Abdomen 2.70 long, 1.24 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.49, ALE 0.27, PLE 0.24, AERW 1.57, PERW 1.51, EFL 0.92. Legs: I 5.96 (1.80, 1.00, 1.58, 1.03, 0.55), II 3.70 (1.13, 0.58, 0.88, 0.68, 0.43), III 4.19 (1.30, 0.63, 0.73, 0.98, 0.55), IV 4.81 (1.40, 0.60, 1.13, 1.15, 053). Carapace red-brown, covered with sparse colourful scale-like setae and thin setae; fovea dark red, longitudinal, linear. Chelicerae red-brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites paler than chelicerae and widened distally. Labium red-brown, bearing brown setae at anterior margin. Sternum slightly longer than wide, with straight anterior margin. Legs pale yellow to red-brown, with strongest legs I bearing three and two pairs of ventral spines on the tibiae and metatarsi. Abdomen elongated, dorsum yellow to brown, with alternate yellow and brown transverse bands, covered wholly by scutum; venter pale, with longitudinal, broad, brown band medially. Palp (Fig. 5A–C). Tibia slightly wider than long in ventral view; RTA slightly less than tibia length, extending anteroventrally, tapered to pointed tip in retrolateral view; DTA flat, almost triangular in ventral view, almost square, and extending anterodorsally in retrolateral view; cymbium ~ 2× longer than wide, setose; bulb elongated, with sub-triangular posterior lobe, medio-retrolaterally located, lamellar tegular bump; embolus strongly sclerotized, short, curved retrolaterally with blunt tip, accompanied by lamellar process more than four times longer than wide, and with arc-shaped out-margin.

Female. Unknown.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan, China.

Genus Indopadilla Caleb & Sankaran, 2019

Indopadilla songi sp. nov.

Figs 6, 7

Type material

Holotype ♂ (TRU-JS 0687), CHINA: Hainan: Ledong County, Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Peak Mountain (18°43.11′N, 108°52.32′E, ca. 1400 m), 17.iv.2019, C. Wang & Y.F. Yang leg. Paratypes 2♂1♀ (TRU-JS 0688–0690), same data as holotype; 1♂ (IZCAS-Ar44505), Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Wufenqu (18°44.42′N, 108°51.80′E, ca. 800 m), 18.v.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after the late Prof. Daxiang Song (1935–2008), who has made significant contributions to the taxonomy of Hainan jumping spiders; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

The male of Indopadilla songi sp. nov. resembles that of I. sabivia Maddison, 2020 in having the bifurcated RTA, but it can be easily distinguished by the RTA has bar-shaped dorsal ramus in retrolateral view (Fig. 6B), vs. tapered, almost triangular dorsal ramus in I. sabivia (Maddison et al. 2020: fig. 118). The female resembles that of I. cuc Wang, Li & Pham, 2023 in having similar epigyne, but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the epigynal hood is almost square in ventral view (Fig. 7A), vs. almost half-round in I. cuc (Wang et al. 2023: fig. 14A); (2) the AG extends posteriorly, and has slightly enlarged terminus (Fig. 7B), vs. extending towards lateral sides, and without enlarged terminus in I. cuc (Wang et al. 2023: fig. 14B).

Figure 6. 

Male palp of Indopadilla songi sp. nov., holotype A ventral B retrolateral C dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 7. 

Indopadilla songi sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D ditto, ventral E female paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A, B, G); 1.0 mm (C–F).

Description

Male (Figs 6, 7C, D, F, G). Total length 6.05. Carapace 2.40 long, 1.95 wide. Abdomen 3.50 long, 1.40 wide. Clypeus 0.06 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.64, ALE 0.30, PLE 0.29, AERW 1.73, PERW 1.68, EFL 1.10. Legs: I 6.68 (1.95, 1.05, 1.75, 1.25, 0.68), II 4.74 (1.38, 0.75, 1.08, 0.98, 0.55), III 4.31 (1.30, 0.70, 0.83, 0.98, 0.50), IV 5.45 (1.65, 0.70, 1.20, 1.35, 0.55). Carapace dark red, with a pair of white setae behind the PLEs, and arc-shaped, red-orange area bearing dense white setae anteriorly on thorax; fovea red-brown, longitudinal. Chelicerae red-brown, each with four promarginal teeth and one retromarginal fissidental tooth with seven cusps. Endites longer than wide, bearing dense brown setae distally on the inner margins. Labium coloured as endites, bearing brown setae on anterior margin. Sternum yellow to red, ~ 1.5× longer than wide. Legs pale to red-brown, legs I strongest, with three and two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae and metatarsi. Abdomen elongated, dorsum green-brown except the lateral sides white, dotted, with two pairs of muscle depressions medially; venter paler than the dorsum, with four, longitudinal, dotted lines. Palp (Fig. 6A–C). Tibia longer than wide; RTA bifurcated, with strongly sclerotized, apically pointed ventral ramus and bar-shaped dorsal ramus; cymbium ~ 2× longer than wide, covered with pale setae; bulb longer than wide, swollen medio-posteriorly, with posterior lobe extending postero-retrolaterally; embolus long and broad, distally divided into the strongly sclerotized, needle-shaped portion, and the weakly sclerotized, irregular portion.

Female (Fig. 7A, B, E). Total length 9.01. Carapace 3.16 long, 2.64 wide. Abdomen 5.19 long, 2.92 wide. Clypeus 0.08 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.78, ALE 0.43, PLE 0.40, AERW 2.26, PERW 2.17, EFL 1.51. Legs: I 7.44 (2.25, 1.38, 1.88, 1.30, 0.63), II 5.91 (1.80, 1.05, 1.38, 1.05, 0.63), III 5.51 (1.75, 0.90, 0.98, 1.25, 0.63), IV 7.14 (2.13, 0.95, 1.68, 1.75, 0.63). Habitus (Fig. 7E) similar to that of male, except paler and with one retromarginal fissidental tooth with ten cusps. Epigyne (Fig. 7A, B). Slightly longer than wide, with sub-square, posterior hood; copulatory openings slit-shaped; copulatory ducts short, swollen, with posteriorly extending accessory glands forming round terminus; spermathecae almost oval, partly overlapped.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Logunattus gen. nov.

Type species

Logunattus libaii sp. nov. from Hainan, China designated herein.

Etymology

The specific name is a combination of logun, referring to Dr. Dmitri V. Logunov (Manchester, UK), a leading arachnologist in jumping spiders, and attus, meaning jumper. The gender is masculine.

Diagnosis

Logunattus gen. nov. can be recognized as a member of the tribe Euophryini Simon, 1901 by the similarity of habitus and palpal structure to the representative genus of this tribe, Euochin Prószyński, 2018, especially the presence of white setae on the dorsum of palpal tibia and cymbium and the loop of sperm duct inside the tegulum (Maddison 2015). It can be easily recognized by the dagger-axe-shaped RTA. It resembles that of Euochin Prószyński, 2018 in having similar habitus, the presence of white setae on the dorsum of tibia and cymbium of male palp, and large spermathecae, but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the embolus is straight or curved, vs. coiled in Euochin (Zha et al. 2014: figs 5, 8, 16, 19; Metzner 2023); (2) the RTA is dagger-axe-shaped in retrolateral view, vs. straight in Euochin (Zha et al. 2014: figs 6, 9, 17, 20; Metzner 2023); (3) the chelicera has a single retrolateral tooth, vs. a retromarginal fissidental tooth with several cusps in the generotype and its congeners of Euochin (see the description in Zha et al. 2014); (4) the epigyne has pair of non-transparent atria lack ridges, vs. transparent atria have concomitant lateral ridges in Euochin (Zha et al. 2014: figs 3, 10, 14, 21; Metzner 2023). The genus also somewhat resembles that of Spiralembolus gen. nov. in having similar habitus and copulatory organs, but it can be easily distinguished by the absence of white setae on clypeus, the dagger-axe-shaped RTA, non-spiralled embolus, the presence of median septum, and accessory glands of copulatory ducts, vs. presence of a cluster of white setae on clypeus, RTA non-dagger-axe-shaped, spiralled embolus, the absence of median septum and accessory glands of copulatory ducts in Spiralembolus (Figs 19, 20A–C, G, 21, 22A–C, G).

Figure 8. 

Male of Logunattus dufui sp. nov., holotype A palp, prolateral B ditto, ventral C ditto, retrolateral D habitus, dorsal E ditto, ventral F carapace, frontal G chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–C, G); 0.5 mm (D–F).

Figure 9. 

Male palp of Logunattus libaii sp. nov., holotype A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Description

Small-sized jumping spider. Sexual dimorphism indistinct. Carapace sub-square, covered with dense white and yellow setae, with elevated cephalic region and sloped thorax; fovea longitudinal, dark, linear. Chelicerae yellow-brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites paler than chelicerae, broadened mediodistally. Labium almost linguiform, paler anteriorly. Sternum longer than wide, almost heart-shaped, with straight anterior margin. Legs yellow to dark brown, covered with sparse spines. Abdomen sub-oval, the dorsum yellow to grey-brown, with small anteromedian scutum that only presented in males; venter paler than dorsum, with pair of longitudinal, central dotted lines.

Palp. Tibia short, with ventro-prolateral bump, dagger-axe-shaped RTA, and dense, white setae dorsally; cymbium longer than wide, with dense white setae dorsally on proximal half; bulb elongate-oval, with distinct posterior lobe; embolus originates from antero-prolateral portion of bulb, forming disc at base, and curved or straight medially, with spinous base apophysis or not.

Epigyne. See the description of the generotype.

Composition

The genus includes two species, the generotype, and G. dufui sp. nov.

Distribution

Known only from Hainan Island, China.

Logunattus dufui sp. nov.

Fig. 8

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44506), China: Hainan: Lingshui County, Diaoluoshan Resort (18°43.51′N, 108°52.10′E, ca. 920 m), 20.iv.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg. Paratypes 3♂ (IZCAS-Ar44507–44509), same data as holotype.

Etymology

The specific name is after Mr. Fu Du (712–770), a famous ancient Chinese poet, who was crowned as Poetry Sage; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

Logunattus dufui sp. nov. resembles that of L. libaii sp. nov. in having similar habitus and palpal structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the embolus, which is straight and with spinous proximal apophysis (Fig. 8B), vs. curved and without apophysis in L. libaii (Fig. 9B).

Description

Male (Fig. 8). Total length 3.32. Carapace 1.79 long, 1.28 wide. Abdomen 1.47 long, 1.10 wide. Clypeus 0.05 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.38, ALE 0.26, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.22, PERW 1.10, EFL 0.76. Legs: I 4.08 (1.19, 0.68, 1.00, 0.73, 0.48), II 2.93 (0.93, 0.50, 0.60, 0.55, 0.35), III 3.48 (1.13, 0.45, 0.75, 0.75, 0.40), IV 3.59 (1.08, 0.50, 0.75, 0.83, 0.43). Carapace red-brown, covered with yellow setae on face and white setae on thorax; fovea dark, longitudinal, linear. Chelicerae each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites broadened medio-distally. Labium linguiform. Sternum longer than wide, with straight anterior margin. Legs yellow to brown, with three and two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae and metatarsi I and II, respectively. Abdomen suboval, dorsum pale to brown, covered with sparse white and brown setae, with two pairs of anterior muscle depressions and anteromedian scutum ca. half the abdominal width and length; venter yellow to pale yellow, with pair of longitudinal, dotted lines medially. Palp (Fig. 8A–C, E). Tibia very short, with ventro-prolateral bump, and dagger-axe-shaped RTA; cymbium ~ 2× longer than wide in ventral view, covered with dense white setae dorso-proximally; bulb elongated, with tapered, downward extending posterior lobe; embolus short and straight, forming disc and with spinous apophysis at base, and blunt apically.

Female. Unknown.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Logunattus libaii sp. nov.

Figs 9, 10

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44510), China: Hainan: Qiongzhong County, Limushan National Nature Reserve, Diaodengling Waterfall (19°10.87′N, 109°45.32′E, ca. 940 m), 5.v.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg. Paratypes 1♂2♀ (IZCAS-Ar44511–44513), same data as holotype; 2♀ (IZCAS-Ar44514–44515), Limushan National Nature Reserve, Direction of Shuiba (19°10.87′N, 109°45.32′E, ca. 960 m), 5.v.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.; 1♂2♀ (IZCAS-Ar44516–44518), Wuzhishan City, Wuzhishan National Nature Reserve, Shanye Hotel (18°54.42′N, 109°40.65′E, ca. 1590 m), 26.iv.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after Mr. Bai Li (701–762), a famous ancient Chinese poet, who was crowned as Poetry Immortal; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

The male of Logunattus libaii sp. nov. resembles that of L. dufui sp. nov. in general shape of palp, but it can be easily distinguished by the embolus, which is curved medially, and without proximal apophysis in ventral view (Fig. 9B), vs. straight and with proximal apophysis in L. dufui (Fig. 8B). The female of this new species resembles that of Spiralembolus yinggeling sp. nov. in having similar epigyne, but it can be easily distinguished by the presence of median septum, and accessory glands of copulatory ducts (Fig. 10A, B), vs. absent in S. yinggeling (Fig. 20A, B).

Description

Male (Figs 9, 10C, D, F, G). Total length 3.45. Carapace 1.83 long, 1.37 wide. Abdomen 1.53 long, 1.15 wide. Clypeus 0.08 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.38, ALE 0.26, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.32, PERW 1.20, EFL 0.79. Legs: I 4.08 (1.15, 0.68, 1.05, 0.75, 0.45), II 3.16 (0.93, 0.58, 0.70, 0.55, 0.40), III 3.77 (1.15, 0.58, 0.86, 0.78, 0.40), IV 3.79 (1.10, 0.53, 0.83, 0.95, 0.38). Carapace red-brown to dark brown, covered with dense setae; fovea dark, longitudinal, bar-shaped. Chelicerae red-brown to dark brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites dark yellow, with pale distal-inner margins bearing dense brown setae. Labium darker than endites. Sternum coloured as endites, slightly longer than wide, with straight anterior margin, widest medially. Legs yellow to dark brown, with three and two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae and metatarsi I and II, respectively. Abdomen oval, dorsum with two pairs of anterior muscle depressions, indistinct brown or dark brown stripes, and big, irregular pale marking posteriorly, covered by anteromedian scutum; venter pale, with pair of longitudinal, dotted lines. Palp (Fig. 9A–C). Tibia short, with ventro-prolateral bump, covered with white dorsal setae; RTA dagger-axe-shaped, almost 1.5 times longer than tibia, with pointed tip; cymbium ~ 1.8× longer than wide in ventral view, covered with dorsal white setae at proximal half; bulb elongate-oval, with blunt posterior lobe extending postero-retrolaterally; embolus originates from the antero-prolateral portion of bulb, forming a disc at base, curved towards prolateral side medially and with rather pointed tip directed towards ~ 10:30 o’clock position.

Figure 10. 

Logunattus libaii sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D ditto, ventral E female paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A, B, G); 0.5 mm (C–F).

Female (Fig. 10A, B, E). Total length 4.02. Carapace 1.87 long, 1.39 wide. Abdomen 2.18 long, 1.64 wide. Clypeus 0.09 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.40, ALE 0.27, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.26, PERW 1.15, EFL 0.84. Legs: I 3.59 (1.05, 0.63, 0.88, 0.60, 0.43), II 3.14 (0.98, 0.53, 0.70, 0.50, 0.43), III 3.89 (1.23, 0.60, 0.85, 0.78, 0.43), IV 3.99 (1.18, 0.53, 0.88, 0.95, 0.45). Habitus (Fig. 10E) similar to that of male except paler, and without scutum on the dorsum of abdomen. Epigyne (Fig. 10A, B). Wider than long, with pair of shallow atria anteromedially; copulatory openings almost half round, open towards downward, separated by the slightly raised median septum; copulatory ducts curved medially, and touched distally, with sub-triangular proximal accessory glands extending antero-prolaterally; spermathecae oval; fertilization ducts lamellar, extending transversely.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Genus Myrmarachne MacLeay, 1839

Myrmarachne mixiaoqii sp. nov.

Figs 11, 12

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44519), China: Hainan: Wuzhishan City, Wuzhishan National Nature Reserve, hillside (18°53.83′N, 109°41.88′E, ca. 1590 m), 9.iv.2009, G. Tang leg. Paratypes 2♀ (IZCAS-Ar44520–44521), same data as holotype; 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44522), same site as holotype, 8.iv.2009, G. Tang leg.; 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44523), Lingshui County, Diaoluoshan National Nature Reserve, Power Station (18°39.84′N, 109°55.81′E, ca. 100 m), 20.iv.2009, G. Tang leg.

Etymology

The specific name is a patronym of Prof. Xiaoqi Mi, who greatly helped us with this research; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

Myrmarachne mixiaoqii sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from other congeners by the presence of a cluster of cymbial macro-setae above the dRTA, and the pair of bag-shaped structures below the epigynal hood, vs. the absence of a cluster of cymbial macro-setae above the dRTA and without similar bag-shaped structures below the epigynal hood in congeners presently known (see Metzner 2023).

Description

Male (Figs 11, 12E–G, I). Total length 5.02. Carapace 2.25 long, 1.34 wide. Abdomen 2.60 long, 1.23 wide. Clypeus 0.09 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.43, ALE 0.22, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.26, PERW 1.30, EFL 0.94. Legs: I 4.47 (1.33, 0.68, 1.30, 0.73, 0.43), II 3.29 (1.00, 0.58, 0.83, 0.55, 0.33), III 3.38 (1.00, 0.50, 0.80, 0.75, 0.33), IV 4.71 (1.40, 0.63, 1.25, 1.08, 0.35). Carapace dark yellow, with elevated cephalic region bearing pair of irregular dark patches behind AMEs, and medially raised thorax. Chelicerae elongated, longer than carapace, each with four promarginal and eight retromarginal teeth. Endites yellow, elongated. Labium slightly darker than endites. Sternum narrow, ~ 3× longer than wide. Legs yellow to brown, with one ventral spine on patellae I, four and two pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I and metatarsi I, respectively. Abdomen elongated, almost gourd-shaped, constricted at anterior 1/3, dorsum yellow to red-brown, covered wholly by scutum; venter pale to brown. Palp (Fig. 11A–D). Tibia wider than long in ventral view; dRTA bifurcated, with platelike ventral ramus and short, digitiform dorsal ramus; cymbium almost oval, bearing cluster of medio-retrolateral macro-setae above the dRTA; bulb almost round, flat, embolus long, coiled more than two coils, with pointed tip reaches the cymbial tip.

Figure 11. 

Male palp of Myrmarachne mixiaoqii sp. nov., holotype A, C ventral B retrolateral D dorsal. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 12. 

Myrmarachne mixiaoqii sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A, C epigyne, ventral B, D vulva, dorsal E holotype habitus, dorsal F ditto, lateral G ditto, ventral H female paratype habitus, dorsal I holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–D); 0.2 mm (I); 1.0 mm (E–H).

Female (Fig. 12A–D, H). Total length 6.00. Carapace 2.46 long, 1.35 wide. Abdomen 3.08 long, 1.58 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.44, ALE 0.22, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.27, PERW 1.35, EFL 1.01. Legs: I 4.09 (1.25, 0.63, 1.18, 0.60, 0.43), II 3.17 (0.98, 0.53, 0.80, 0.53, 0.33), III 3.47 (1.00, 0.48, 0.83, 0.78, 0.38), IV 4.97 (1.48, 0.63, 1.33, 1.13, 0.40). Habitus (Fig. 12H) similar to that of male except with much shorter chelicerae each with five promarginal and nine or ten retromarginal teeth, without dorsal scutum on abdomen, and with six pairs of ventral spines on tibiae I. Epigyne (Fig. 12A–D). Longer than wide, with tube-shaped epigynal hood fused with pair of bag-shaped structures posteriorly; atria paired, with invert L-shaped lateral ridges; copulatory ducts long, forming complex paths with three distal coils; spermathecae almost spherical, anteriorly located, separated from each other slightly less than their diameter.

Distribution

Only known from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Genus Nandicius Prószyński, 2016

Nandicius shihaitaoi sp. nov.

Figs 13, 14

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44524), China: Hainan: Baisha County, Yinggeling National Nature Reserve (19°03.05′N, 109°33.78′E, ca. 680 m), 21.viii.2010, G. Zheng leg. Paratypes 1♂1♀ (IZCAS–Ar44525–44526), same data as holotype; 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44527), Lingshui County, Diaoluoshan National Nature Reserve, Plank Road (18°43.60′N, 109°51.99′E, ca. 950 m), 8.viii.2010, G. Zheng leg.; 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44528), Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Mingfeng Valley (18°44.65′N, 108°50.44′E, ca 1000 m), 18.viii.2010, G. Zheng Leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after Prof. Haitao Shi, a leading scientist in turtle conservation; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

The male of Nandicius shihaitaoi sp. nov. resembles that of N. proszynskii Wang & Li, 2021 in having very similar habitus and palpal structure, but it can be easily distinguished by the presence of bRTA (Fig. 13B, C), vs. bRTA absent in N. proszynskii (Wang and Li 2021: fig. 10B, C). The female closely resembles that of Tasa koreana (Wesołowska, 1981) in having very similar epigyne, but it can be easily distinguished by the presence of a basal epigynal plate, and the C-shaped copulatory openings (Fig. 14A), vs. the absence of basal epigynal plate and oval copulatory opeings in T. koreana (Suguro and Yahata 2014: fig. 29). The female also resembles that of Madhyattus jabalpurensis Prószyński, 1992 in having a very similar epigyne, but it can be easily distinguished by the distance between the copulatory openings, which is more than half the epigynal width (Fig. 14A), vs. ~ 1/3 the epigynal width in M. jabalpurensis (Prószyński 1992: fig. 77).

Figure 13. 

Male palp of Nandicius shihaitaoi sp. nov., holotype A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 14. 

Nandicius shihaitaoi sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C holotype habitus, dorsal D ditto, ventral E female paratype habitus, dorsal F holotype carapace, frontal G holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A, B, G); 0.2 mm (F); 0.5 mm (C–E).

Description

Male (Figs 13, 14C, D, F, G). Total length 2.87. Carapace 1.34 long, 0.92 wide. Abdomen 1.55 long, 0.81 wide. Clypeus 0.09 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.22, ALE 0.12, PLE 0.12, AERW 0.77, PERW 0.77, EFL 0.58. Legs: I 1.91 (0.58, 0.38, 0.45, 0.30, 0.20), II 1.46 (0.45, 0.30, 0.28, 0.25, 0.18), III 1.55 (0.48, 0.23, 0.33, 0.28, 0.23), IV 2.11 (0.73, 0.25, 0.50, 0.38, 0.25). Carapace yellow except the lateral sides of eye field black, covered with white and brown setae, with cluster of white setae at the median of anterior margin, pair of white stripes of setae laterally on cephalic region, and pair of elongate-oval dark spots medially on eye field; fovea indistinct. Chelicerae dark yellow, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites longer than wide, widened distally, bearing dense setae distally on inner margins. Labium tapered, almost linguiform. Sternum ~ 1.5× longer than wide, with straight anterior margin. Legs pale to dark yellow, with green-brown stripes on the lateral of femora, patellae, and metatarsi II, III, IV; leg I strongest, with slightly enlarged femora and tibiae. Abdomen elongated, dorsum with several transverse chevron patterns medio-posteriorly; venter pale. Palp (Fig. 13A–C). Tibia wider than long, with three apophyses, including the retrolateral one curved inwards distally and blunt apically, the dorsal one almost triangular, and the broad baso-retrolateral one with several small apophyses; cymbium ~ 1.5× longer than wide, with tuberous proximal apophysis; bulb elongated, swollen medio-posteriorly, with antero-retrolateral bump; embolus originates from the antero-prolateral portion of bulb, short and straight, tapered to the rather pointed tip directed towards ~ 2 o’clock position.

Female (Fig. 14A, B, E). Total length 3.18. Carapace 1.22 long, 0.80 wide. Abdomen 1.90 long, 1.02 wide. Clypeus 0.10 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.23, ALE 0.13, PLE 0.12, AERW 0.72, PERW 0.75, EFL 0.54. Legs: I 1.54 (0.48, 0.30, 0.33, 0.25, 0.18), II 1.34 (0.43, 0.25, 0.28, 0.20, 0.18), III 1.52 (0.48, 0.23, 0.30, 0.28, 0.23), IV 2.11 (0.70, 0.28, 0.50, 0.38, 0.25). Habitus (Fig. 14E) similar to that of male except without the cluster of setae on the median of the anterior margin of carapace. Epigyne (Fig. 14A, B). Slightly wider than long, with arc-shaped base plate; copulatory openings posteriorly located, C-shaped, and separated from each other ca. half the epigynal width; copulatory ducts thickest proximally, curved into S-shape, with curved, bar-shaped, terminal accessory glands; spermathecae elongated, curved into C-shape.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Comments

The new species is placed into the genus provisionally because it shares a very similar habitus and palpal structure with the known congener, Nandicius proszynskii Wang & Li, 2021. However, it is inconsistent with other congeners in the epigynal structure and body shape, which indicates its generic position needs further confirmation.

Genus Pancorius Simon, 1902

Pancorius hainanensis Song & Chai, 1991

Figs 15, 16

Pancorius hainanensis Song & Chai, 1991: 20, fig. 10A, B (male holotype, examined).

Type material examined

Holotype ♂, China: Hainan: Bawangling National Nature Reserve, xii.1989, M.S. Zhu leg.

Other material examined

1♂1♀ (TRU-JS 0691–0692), China: Hainan: Qiongzhong County, Limushan National Nature Reserve, 1–5.v.2021, F.E. Li leg.

Diagnosis

The male of Pancorius hainanensis Song & Chai, 1991 resembles that of P. wesolowskae Wang & Wang, 2020 in the general shape of palpal structure, especially the small, blunt posterior lobe, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: (1) the RTA being slightly greater than sperm duct diameter in width, and with a pointed tip in retrolateral view (Fig. 15B), vs. more than two times greater than sperm duct diameter in width, and blunt apically in P. wesolowskae (Wang and Wang 2020: fig. 20), (2) the embolus acutely narrowed to the pointed tip distally in ventral view (Fig. 15A) vs. almost tapered in P. wesolowskae (Wang and Wang 2020: fig. 19). The female of this species resembles that of P. crinitus Logunov & Jäger, 2015 in having very shallow epigynal hoods, but it can be easily distinguished by anterior chamber of spermathecae, which are wider than long (Fig. 16B), vs. ~ 2× longer than wide in P. crinitus (Logunov and Jäger 2015: fig. 43).

Figure 15. 

Male palp of Pancorius hainanensis Song & Chai, 1991 A ventral B retrolateral C dorsal. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 16. 

Pancorius hainanensis Song & Chai, 1991 A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C male habitus, dorsal D ditto, ventral E female habitus, dorsal F male carapace, frontal G male chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A, B, G); 1.0 mm (C–F).

Description

Male (Figs 15, 16C, D, F, G). Total length 8.21. Carapace 3.94 long, 3.16 wide. Abdomen 4.00 long, 2.47 wide. Clypeus 0.18 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.91, ALE 0.58, PLE 0.52, AERW 2.95, PERW 2.63, EFL 1.84. Legs: I 9.31 (2.58, 1.70, 2.45, 1.63, 0.95), II 8.21 (2.65, 1.45, 1.88, 1.35, 0.88), III 9.18 (2.98, 1.30, 2.10, 1.80, 1.00), IV 8.16 (2.50, 1.13, 1.80, 1.85, 0.88). Carapace red-brown to dark brown, covered with white and dark setae, dense on both sides; fovea longitudinal, dark. Chelicerae red-brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites paler than chelicerae, bearing dense dark brown setae on the distal half of inner margins. Labium tapered, with pale distal end. Sternum yellow to red-brown, shield-shaped, ~ 1.5× longer than wide. Legs yellow to dark, setose, and spiny. Abdomen elongated, dorsum dark brown and mingled with green, spotted, with longitudinal, pale band anteromedially, two pairs of median muscle depressions followed by four transverse arc-shaped pale stripes; venter dark brown, spotted laterally, with pair of longitudinal, dotted lines medially. Palp (Fig. 15A–C). Tibia longer than wide, with strongly sclerotized RTA slightly curved inward distally and pointed apically; cymbium 1.5× longer than wide; bulb slightly swollen, with small bean-shaped posterior lobe; embolus short, broad, and flat, slightly curved retrolaterally, with pointed tip.

Female (Fig. 16A, B, E). Total length 8.57. Carapace 3.60 long, 2.91 wide. Abdomen 4.69 long, 3.09 wide. Clypeus 0.20 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.90, ALE 0.59, PLE 0.50, AERW 2.71, PERW 2.57, EFL 1.77. Legs: I 7.58 (2.20, 1.45, 1.88, 1.25, 0.80), II 6.91 (2.20, 1.30, 1.58, 1.13, 0.70), III 8.54 (2.83, 1.40, 1.75, 1.68, 0.88), IV 7.79 (2.38, 1.10, 1.80, 1.73, 0.78). Habitus (Fig. 16E) similar to that of male except without dense setae on the carapace and with an almost T-shaped yellow area on thorax. Epigyne (Fig. 16A, B). Wider than long, with pair of very shallow posterior hoods; copulatory openings slit-shaped, located medially; copulatory ducts very short, curved medially; spermathecae divided into two chambers, the anterior chamber oval, much smaller than the elongate, posterior chamber.

Distribution

Known only from Hainan Island, China.

Qiongattus gen. nov.

Type species

Qiongattus yuanyeae sp. nov. from Hainan, China designated herein.

Etymology

The specific name is a combination of Pinyin “Qiong”, the short name of Hainan Province, and attus, meaning jumper. The gender is masculine.

Diagnosis

The classification position of Qiongattus gen. nov. is uncertain. It resembles that of Chinattus Logunov, 1999, and Habrocestoides Prószyński, 1992 in having a single retromarginal cheliceral tooth, and similar copulatory organs, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: (1) the narrow cymbium, which is ~ 3× longer than wide in ventral view, vs. wider and less than two times longer than wide in Chinattus and Habrocestoides (Prószyński 1992: figs 16, 22; Logunov 1999: figs 13, 24, 28, 32, 35 40; Metzner 2023); (2) the basal epigynal plate lacking round structure, vs. present in Chinattus and Habrocestoides (Prószyński 1992: figs 25, 26; Logunov 1999: figs 17, 19, 22, 45; Metzner 2023); (3) the spermathecae have U-shaped heads, vs. absent in Chinattus and Habrocestoides (Prószyński 1992: figs 26, 27; Logunov 1999: figs 18, 20, 23, 46; Metzner 2023). The genus also somewhat resembles that of Phintella Strand, 1906 in the general shape of palp, but it can be easily distinguished by the absence of tegular bump, and the postero-prolaterally extended posterior lobe, vs. tegular bump medio-retrolaterally located on bulb and posterior lobe is downward or postero-retrolaterally extending in Phintella (Żabka 1985: figs 403, 408, 420, 422, 426, 430, 435, 447–450; Metzner 2023).

Description

See the description of generotype.

Composition

The genus is monotypic presently.

Distribution

Known only from Hainan Island, China.

Qiongattus yuanyeae sp. nov.

Figs 17, 18

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44529), China: Hainan: Ledong County, Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Tianchi (18°44.45′N, 108°57.49′E, ca. 860 m), 18.vii.2007, S.Q. Li leg. Paratypes 1♂1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44530–44531), same data as holotype; 1♂1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44532–44533), Jianfengling National Nature Reserve (18°44.38′N, 108°51.06′E, ca. 890 m), 19.vii.2007, C.X. Wang leg.; 1♂1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44534–44535), Lingshui County, Diaoluoshan National Nature Reserve, Direction of the Mysterious Tree (18°43.50′N, 108°52.10′E, ca. 920 m), 18.iv.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.; 1♀ (IZCAS-Ar44536), Diaoluoshan Resort (18°43.51′N, 108°52.10′E, ca. 920 m), 20.iv.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after one of the collectors of the type specimens, Ms. Yuanye Zhou; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

The male of Qiongattus yuanyeae sp. nov. resembles that of Chinattus chichila Logunov, 2003 in the general shape of palp, but it can be easily distinguished by the narrow cymbium, which is ~ 3× longer than wide in ventral view (Fig. 17B), vs. less than 2× longer than wide in C. chichila (Logunov 2003: fig. 1), and by the RTA, which is acutely narrowed distally in retrolateral view (Fig. 17C), vs. tapered in C. chichila (Logunov 2003: fig. 2). The female of this species resembles that of Chinattus inflatus Wang & Li, 2020 in having similar basal epigynal plate, but it can be easily distinguished by the presence of spermathecal head and the absence of round structure on basal epigynal plate (Fig. 18A–C) vs. spermathecae lack heads and basal epigynal plate has round structure in C. inflatus (Wang and Li 2021: fig. 1A, B).

Figure 17. 

Male palp of Qiongattus yuanyeae sp. nov., holotype A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 18. 

Qiongattus yuanyeae sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A, B epigyne, ventral C vulva, dorsal D holotype habitus, dorsal E ditto, ventral F female paratype habitus, dorsal G holotype carapace, frontal H holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–C, H); 0.5 mm (D–G).

Description

Male (Figs 17, 18D, E, G, H). Total length 3.94. Carapace 2.00 long, 1.65 wide. Abdomen 1.62 long, 1.32 wide. Clypeus 0.12 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.53, ALE 0.31, PLE 0.29, AERW 1.59, PERW 1.50, EFL 1.03. Legs: I 4.38 (1.23, 0.75, 1.00, 0.95, 0.45), II 3.69 (1.13, 0.65, 0.85, 0.63, 0.43), III 4.04 (1.23, 0.63, 0.88, 0.80, 0.50), IV 4.25 (1.32, 0.60, 0.88, 0.95, 0.50). Carapace red-brown to dark brown, covered with dense pale thin setae, with elevated cephalic region, and sloped thorax; fovea longitudinal, dark, bar-shaped. Chelicerae red-brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites widened distally, the distal half of inner margins paler, bearing dense brown setae. Labium red-brown to dark brown. Sternum slightly longer than wide, with straight anterior margin. Legs yellow to dark brown. Abdomen oval, dorsum grey to dark brown, with transverse, antero-marginal dark stripe, pair of anteromedian muscle depressions followed by pair of mediolateral dark patches; venter coloured as dorsum. Palp (Figs 17A–C, 18E). Patella longer than wide, with disto-retrolateral bump; tibia ~ 1.5× longer than wide, with short, inwards curved RTA acutely narrowed to rather pointed tip in retrolateral view; cymbium narrow, ~ 3× longer than wide in ventral view; bulb elongated, swollen medio-posteriorly, with blunt posterior lobe extending postero-prolaterally; embolus originating the apex of bulb, short, slightly curved medially.

Female (Fig. 18A–C, F). Total length 4.16. Carapace 2.10 long, 1.81 wide. Abdomen 1.94 long, 1.45 wide. Clypeus 0.12 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.56, ALE 0.32, PLE 0.29, AERW 1.74, PERW 1.64, EFL 1.16. Legs: I 4.44 (1.38, 0.83, 1.05, 0.73, 0.45), II 4.00 (1.25, 0.75, 0.90, 0.65, 0.45), III 4.37 (1.38, 0.65, 0.98, 0.88, 0.48), IV 4.62 (1.43, 0.63, 1.00, 1.03, 0.53). Habitus (Fig. 18F) similar to that of male, except paler. Epigyne (Fig. 18A–C). Wider than long, with broad, arc-shaped basal plate; copulatory openings small, medially located, separated from each other ~ 1/3 the basal plate width; copulatory ducts very short, with bar-shaped accessory glands; spermathecae oval, with almost U-shaped heads.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Spiralembolus gen. nov.

Type species

Spiralembolus yinggeling sp. nov. from Hainan, China designated herein.

Etymology

The specific name is a combination of spiral and embolus, referring to the species that has spiral embolus. The gender is masculine.

Diagnosis

Spiralembolus gen. nov. can be recognized as a member of the tribe Euophryini Simon, 1901 for the same reasons as Logunattus gen. nov. It is remarkable for the thick, spiral embolus. It above diagnosed with Logunattus gen. nov. It also resembles that of Euochin Prószyński, 2018 in having similar habitus and palpal structure, especially the presence of white setae on the dorsum of palpal tibia and cymbium, and the oval or round spermathecae, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: (1) the thick, spiralled embolus, not forming a disc at base, vs. flagelliform, coiled embolus, and mostly forming a disc at base in Euochin (Zha et al. 2014: figs 5, 8, 16, 19; Metzner 2023); (2) the presence of a cluster of white setae on clypeus, and dorsal abdominal scutum in males, vs. absent in Euochin (Zha et al. 2014: figs 2, 13; Metzner 2023); (3) the epigyne lacking pair of oval or round transparent atria, and the concomitant lateral ridges, vs. present in Euochin (Zha et al. 2014: figs 3, 10, 14, 21; Metzner 2023). The genus also somewhat resembles that of Chalcovietnamicus Marusik, 1991 in having similar epigyne, but it can be easily distinguished by the presence of clusters of white setae on clypeus, and the dorsum of tibia and cymbium of palp, the spiralled embolus lacks lamellar basal apophysis, vs. without clusters of white setae on clypeus, and the dorsum of tibia and cymbium of palp, non-spiralled embolus with lamellar basal apophysis in Chalcovietnamicus (Żabka 1985: figs 71–74; Wang and Li 2022a: figs 3A–C, 4F).

Description

Small-sized jumping spider. Sexual dimorphism scarcely evident. Carapace darker in males and, covered with cluster of white setae on clypeus that only presents in males, with elevated, sub-square cephalic region bearing thin setae, and sloped thorax with dark brown stripes; fovea dark red, longitudinal. Chelicerae each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites widened distally, with paler inner margins bearing dense brown setae. Labium tapered, almost linguiform. Sternum longer than wide, with straight anterior margin, bearing brown and pale setae of various lengths. Legs yellow to dark brown, spinous, with clusters of white setae on femora and tibiae that only present in males. Abdomen darker in males, dorsum covered with dense white setae and with antero-median scutum, those only present in males, and with several transverse, pale stripes posteriorly in both sexes; venter setose.

Palp. Tibia very short, covered with dorsal white setae; RTA short, curved medially or distally, with rather blunt tip; cymbium longer than wide, covered with dorsal white setae on proximal half; bulb swollen; embolus thick, strongly sclerotized, originates from the prolatero-apical portion of bulb, spiralled into coils.

Epigyne. Wider than long, without distinct atrium; copulatory openings located anteriorly or medially, round or oval, separated from each other at least their width; copulatory ducts short, strongly curved anteriorly; spermathecae oval or spherical, with distinct Bennett’s glands; fertilization ducts originate from the anterior portions of spermathecae, extending transversely.

Composition

The genus only contains two species, the generotype, and S. yui sp. nov.

Distribution

Known only from Hainan Island, China.

Spiralembolus yinggeling sp. nov.

Figs 19, 20

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44537), China: Hainan: Qiongzhong County, Yinggeling National Nature Reserve, Yinggezui Waterfall (19°03.04′N, 109°44.89′E, ca. 620 m), 8.v.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg. Paratypes 1♂3♀ (IZCAS-Ar44538–44541), same data as holotype; 3♀ (IZCAS-Ar44542–44544), Changjiang County, Bawangling National Nature Reserve, Dong’er Management Station (19°05.18′N, 109°11.80′E, ca. 800 m), 25.xii.2007, C.X. Wang leg.; 11♂10♀ (IZCAS-Ar44545–44565), Qiongzhong County, Limushan National Nature Reserve, Direction of Shuiba (19°10.87′N, 109°45.32′E, ca. 960 m), 5.v.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.; 1♂2♀ (IZCAS-Ar44566–44568), Wuzhishan City, Wuzhishan National Nature Reserve, Direction of Yunding (18°54.42′N, 109°40.65′E, ca. 1140 m), 27.iv.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after the holotype locality, Yinggeling National Nature Reserve ; noun (name) in apposition.

Diagnosis

Spiralembolus yinggeling sp. nov. resembles that of S. yui sp. nov. in having similar habitus and copulatory organs, but it can be easily distinguished by the following: (1) the embolus is spiralled into less than three coils (Fig. 19B), vs. more than four coils in S. yui (Fig. 21B); (2) the RTA is tapered in retrolateral view (Fig. 19C), vs. acutely narrowed postero-medially in S. yui (Fig. 21C); (3) the copulatory ducts ca. half the spermathecal width, and connected to the postero-inner portions of spermathecae (Fig. 20B), vs. ~ 1/4 the spermathecal width, and connected to the antero-inner portions of spermathecae in S. yui (Fig. 22B).

Figure 19. 

Male palp of Spiralembolus yinggeling sp. nov., holotype A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 20. 

Spiralembolus yinggeling sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C vulva, anterodorsal D holotype habitus, dorsal E ditto, ventral F female paratype habitus, dorsal G holotype carapace, frontal H holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–C, H); 0.5 mm (D–G).

Figure 21. 

Male palp of Spiralembolus yui sp. nov., holotype A prolateral B ventral C retrolateral. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 22. 

Spiralembolus yui sp. nov., male holotype and female paratype A epigyne, ventral B vulva, dorsal C vulva, anterodorsal D holotype habitus, dorsal E ditto, ventral F female paratype habitus, dorsal G holotype carapace, frontal H holotype chelicera, posterior. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–C, H); 0.5 mm (D–G).

Description

Male (Figs 19, 20D, E, G, H). Total length 3.20. Carapace 1.76 long, 1.36 wide. Abdomen 1.40 long, 1.10 wide. Clypeus 0.07 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.40, ALE 0.26, PLE 0.22, AERW 1.36, PERW 1.28, EFL 0.80. Legs: I 3.26 (1.00, 0.55, 0.80, 0.53, 0.38), II 2.82 (0.90, 0.48, 0.63, 0.43, 0.38), III 3.24 (1.03, 0.48, 0.75, 0.63, 0.35), IV 3.57 (1.08, 0.48, 0.80, 0.83, 0.38). Carapace red-brown to dark, almost square, covered with thin setae on cephalic region, with cluster of white setae on clypeus, and oblique, dark brown stripes on thorax; fovea longitudinal, dark, linear. Chelicerae dark yellow to red-brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites almost square, with paler inner margins bearing brown setae. Labium tapered, bearing several dark setae on paler distal portion. Sternum almost oval, yellow-brown, and covered with dark setae. Legs yellow to dark brown, bearing dense dark brown ventral setae on tibiae I and clusters of white setae on femora and tibiae. Abdomen oval, dorsum dark brown, covered with white and dark setae and anteromedian scutum, with irregular pale-yellow patches medially and transverse, pale stripes posteriorly; venter dark brown, covered with short dark brown setae, with pair of mediolateral pale patches. Palp (Figs 19A–C, 20E). Tibia short, covered with dense white, long setae dorsally, with tapered RTA curved towards ventral side medially and blunt apically; cymbium ~ two times longer than wide, covered with dense, long, white setae on the dorsum of proximal half; bulb swollen; sperm duct strongly curved retrolaterally; embolus originates from the antero-prolateral portion of bulb, spiralled into less than three coils, with rather pointed tip.

Female (Fig. 20A–C, F). Total length 3.68. Carapace 1.56 long, 1.20 wide. Abdomen 1.98 long, 1.54 wide. Clypeus 0.08 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.39, ALE 0.24, PLE 0.22, AERW 1.24, PERW 1.17, EFL 0.78. Legs: I 3.13 (0.95, 0.55, 0.75, 0.50, 0.38), II 2.90 (0.93, 0.48, 0.63, 0.48, 0.38), III 3.36 (1.05, 0.50, 0.78, 0.60, 0.43), IV 3.79 (1.08, 0.50, 0.88, 0.80, 0.53). Habitus (Fig. 20F) similar to that of male except paler, without dense dorsal white and dark setae, and the dorsal scutum on the abdomen, the cluster of white setae on clypeus, and clusters of white setae on femora and tibiae of legs. Epigyne (Fig. 20A–C). Wider than long; copulatory openings round, anteromedially located, separated from each other ~ 1.5× equal to their width; copulatory ducts thick, inner to spermathecae, close to each other, strongly curved anteromedially, and connected to the posterior portions of spermathecae; spermathecae almost oval, ~ 2× wider than copulatory ducts; fertilization ducts originate from the most antero-inner portions of spermathecae, transversely extending.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Spiralembolus yui sp. nov.

Figs 21, 22

Type material

Holotype ♂ (IZCAS-Ar44569), China: Hainan: Ledong County, Jianfengling National Nature Reserve, Wufenqu (18°44.03′N, 108°55.46′E, ca. 960 m), 15.viii.2010, G. Zheng leg. Paratypes 1♂2♀ (IZCAS-Ar44570–44572), same data as holotype; 4♂2♀ (IZCAS-Ar44573–44578), Wuzhishan City, Wuzhishan National Nature Reserve, Direction of Yunding (18°54.42′N, 109°40.65′E, ca. 1140 m), 27.iv.2011, Y.Y. Zhou leg.

Etymology

The specific name is after Mr. Yu Li (937–978), one of the famous ancient Chinese poets and one sorrowful ancient Chinese Emperor; noun (name) in genitive case.

Diagnosis

Spiralembolus yui sp. nov. closely resembles that of S. yinggeling sp. nov., but it can be distinguished by the following: (1) the embolus is spiralled into more than four coils (Fig. 21B), vs. less than three coils in S. yinggeling (Fig. 19B); (2) the RTA is acutely narrowed postero-medially in retrolateral view (Fig. 21C), vs. tapered in S. yinggeling (Fig. 19C); (3) the copulatory ducts are ~ 1/4 the spermathecal width and connected to the antero-inner portions of spermathecae (Fig. 22B), vs. ~ half the spermathecal width, and connected to the postero-inner portions of spermathecae in S. yinggeling (Fig. 20B).

Description

Male (Figs 21, 22D, E, G, H). Total length 2.83. Carapace 1.56 long, 1.17 wide. Abdomen 1.31 long, 0.98 wide. Clypeus 0.09 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.39, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.20, AERW 1.19, PERW 1.10, EFL 0.75. Legs: I 3.13 (0.95, 0.55, 0.78. 0.45, 0.40), II 2.66 (0.83, 0.43, 0.60, 0.45, 0.35), III 3.11 (1.00, 0.45, 0.68, 0.60, 0.38), IV 3.39 (1.08, 0.50, 0.73, 0.70, 0.38). Carapace red brown except the lateral of the eye field black, covered with dense white setae on clypeus and with oblique, dark stripes on the sloped thorax; fovea longitudinal, dark, linear. Chelicerae yellow to yellow-brown, each with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth. Endites widened medio-posteriorly, bearing brown setae on the pale distal half of inner margins. Labium tapered, with several dark brown setae at distal portion. Sternum yellow-brown, ~ 1.5× longer than wide, with straight anterior margin, covered with sparse dark setae of various lengths. Legs yellow to dark brown, with clusters of white setae on femora and tibiae. Abdomen oval, dorsum covered with dense white, short setae and sparse brown setae, with anteromedian scutum ~ half the abdomen width and length, and four transverse pale stripes posteriorly; venter pale to brown, covered with brown setae. Palp (Figs 21A–C, 22E). Tibia wider than long; RTA lamellar baso-medially, the remainder acutely narrowed and curved ventrally, and with rather pointed tip; cymbium longer than wide, covered with dense white setae on dorsum of the proximal half; bulb elongate-oval, swollen; sperm duct strongly curved retrolaterally; embolus originates from the antero-prolateral portion of bulb, spiralled into more than four coils, with pointed tip.

Female (Fig. 22A–C, F). Total length 2.85. Carapace 1.57 long, 1.15 wide. Abdomen 1.45 long, 1.06 wide. Clypeus 0.09 high. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.38, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.21, AERW 1.21, PERW 1.13, EFL 0.74. Legs: I 2.66 (0.80, 0.48, 0.63, 0.40, 0.35), II 2.35 (0.75, 0.40, 0.55, 0.35, 0.30), III 2.74 (0.83, 0.43, 0.60, 0.53, 0.35), IV 3.14 (0.93, 0.40, 0.73, 0.70, 0.38). Habitus (Fig. 22F) similar to that of male except paler, without the dense white setae on clypeus and the dorsal scutum on abdomen. Epigyne (Fig. 22A–C). Almost as long as wide; copulatory openings oval, medially located, separated from each other ca. their width; copulatory ducts short, connected to the antero-inner portions of spermathecae; spermathecae oval, touched; fertilization ducts lamellar, transverse extending.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality in Hainan Island, China.

Acknowledgments

The manuscript benefited greatly from comments by Gergin Blagoev (Ontario, Canada), Jerzy Prószyński (Warsaw, Poland), and Dmitri V. Logunov (Manchester, UK). English was checked by Danni Sherwood (UK). Guo Zheng, Guo Tang, Chunxia Wang, Yuanye Zhou, Yunhu Mo, Yuanfa Yang, and Feng′e Li helped with fieldwork.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was declared.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC-31972869, 31660609, 32200369), the Science and Technology Project Foundation of Guizhou Province ([2020]1Z014), the Key Laboratory Project of Guizhou Province ([2020]2003), the Open Project of Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Hainan Normal University, China ([HNSF-OP-202201]), and the Doctoral Research Foundation of Tongren University (trxyDH2102).

Author contributions

CW and SL performed morphological species identification. CW finished the species descriptions. CW and SL drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Shuqiang Li https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5416

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Barrion AT, Barrion-Dupo ALA, Catindig JLA, Villareal MO, Cai D, Yuan QH, Heong KL (2013) New species of spiders (Araneae) from Hainan Island, China. UPLB Museum Publications in Natural History 3: 1–103. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.269136
  • Guo J (2011) Taxonomic study of the family Salticidae from Hainan Island (Arachnida: Araneae). Master Thesis, Hebei University, China.
  • Guo J, Zhang F, Zhu MS (2011a) One newly recorded genus and one new species of the family Salticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from China. Acta Arachnologica Sinica 20(1): 1–3.
  • Guo J, Zhang F, Zhu MS (2011b) Two new species of the genus Irura Peckham & Peckham, 1901 (Araneae: Salticidae) from Hainan Island, China. Acta Arachnologica 60(2): 89–91. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.60.89
  • Jastrzębski P (1999) Salticidae from the Himalaya: The genus Carrhotus Thorell 1891 (Araneae, Salticidae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 79: 1–9.
  • Logunov DV (1999) Redefinition of the genus Habrocestoides Prószyński, 1992, with establishment of a new genus, Chinattus gen. n. (Araneae: Salticidae). Bulletin – British Arachnological Society 11: 139–149.
  • Logunov DV (2003) A new species of the genus Chinattus Logunov, 1999 from Nepal (Araneae: Salticidae). Genus 14: 581–584.
  • Maddison WP, Beattie I, Marathe K, Ng PYC, Kanesharatnam N, Benjamin SP, Kunte K (2020) A phylogenetic and taxonomic review of baviine jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae, Baviini). ZooKeys 1004: 27–97. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1004.57526
  • Peng XJ, Kim J (1997) Three new species of the genus Eupoa from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology 13: 193–198.
  • Peng XJ, Li SQ (2006) Description of Eupoa liaoi sp. nov. from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa 1285: 65–68.
  • Prószyński J (1987) Atlas rysunków diagnostycznych mniej znanych Salticidae 2. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoly Rolniczo-Pedagogicznej, Siedlcach, 172 pp.
  • Prószyński J (1992) Salticidae (Araneae) of India in the collection of the Hungarian National Natural History Museum in Budapest. Annales Zoologici, Warszawa 44: 165–277.
  • Satkunanathan A, Benjamin SP (2022) Phylogenetic placement of Carrhotus Thorell, 1891 with three new species from Sri Lanka (Araneae: Salticidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 817: 78–110. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.817.1765
  • Song DX (1991) Three new species of the genus Ptocasius from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Sinozoologia 8: 163–168.
  • Song DX, Chai JY (1991) New species and new records of the family Salticidae from Hainan, China (Arachnida: Araneae). In: Qian YW et al. (Eds) Animal Science Research. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, 13–30.
  • Song DX, Gong LS (1992) A new species of the genus Gedea from China (Araneae: Salticidae). Dong Wu Fen Lei Xue Bao 17: 291–293.
  • Song DX, Zhu MS (1998) Two new species of the family Salticidae (Araneae) from China. Acta Arachnologica Sinica 7: 26–29.
  • Song DX, Gu MB, Chen ZF (1988) Three new species of the family Salticidae from Hainan, China. Bulletin of Hangzhou Normal College (nat. Sci. ) 1988(6): 70–74.
  • Suguro T, Yahata K (2014) Taxonomic notes on Japanese species of the genera Pseudicius and Tasa (Araneae: Salticidae). Acta Arachnologica 63(2): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.63.87
  • Wang WH, Wang C (2020) Description of two new species of the jumping spider genus Pancorius Simon, 1902 (Araneae: Salticidae) from Southwest China. Zootaxa 4899(1): 354–362. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4899.1.17
  • World Spider Catalog (2023) World Spider Catalog. Version 24. Natural History Museum Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch [Accessed on 17 April 2023]
  • Yu K, Wang W, Maddison WP, Zhang J (2022) Revision of the genus Charippus Thorell, 1895, with descriptions of eight new species (Araneae, Salticidae, Euophryini). Zootaxa 5129(2): 151–198. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5129.2.1
  • Żabka M (1985) Systematic and zoogeographic study on the family Salticidae (Araneae) from Vietnam. Annales Zoologici, Warszawa 39: 197–485.
  • Zha S, Jin C, Zhang F (2014) The first description of the male Euophrys atrata and E. bulbus from southern China (Araneae: Salticidae). Zootaxa 3779(3): 368–374. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3779.3.4
  • Zhang J, Li D (2005) Four new and one newly recorded species of the jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae: Lyssomaninae & Spartaeinae) from (sub)tropical China. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 53: 221–229.
login to comment