Research Article
Print
Research Article
Entyposis frici (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae), a new species from Somaliland
expand article infoAleš Bezděk, Richard Sehnal§, Hassan S. A. Elmi|, David Sommer, David Král
‡ Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
§ Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
| Amoud University, Borama, Somalia
¶ Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
Open Access

Abstract

Entyposis frici Bezděk & Sehnal, sp. nov., from Somaliland is described and relevant diagnostic characters are illustrated. The new species is compared with the morphologically closely similar Entyposis Kolbe, 1894 species. An updated checklist and an identification key to northeastern African Entyposis species are provided.

Key words

Description, Ethiopian region, Horn of Africa, Scarabaeoidea, Schizonychini, taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Entyposis Kolbe, 1894 forms a characteristic group with striking sexual dimorphism within the tribe Schizonychini (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Melolonthinae). The pronotum of males is thickened basally into conspicuous bulges and has a deep medial impression that widens anteriorly into a prominent tubercle. Both the basal bulges and the medial impression are only weakly developed in females. The rather similar genus Entypophana Moser, 1913 differs from Entyposis primarily in the shape of the occipital carina, which is simple in Entyposis but elevated medially into a broad edge or simple (occasionally double) horn in Entypophana (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012; Sehnal 2017).

According to a recent revision of Entyposis by Lacroix and Montreuil (2012), there were nine species distributed in eastern Africa. Thenceforth, two more papers have been published. Sehnal (2017) described a new Entyposis from southern Ethiopia, and later he (Sehnal 2019) synonymized Proseconius Kolbe, 1894 with Entyposis and E. cavicollis (Fairmaire, 1887) with P. capito (Gerstaecker, 1873). Thus, 10 Entyposis species are known to be distributed from southern Ethiopia to northern Zimbabwe.

Within the rich material recently collected by Czech entomologists in Somaliland during 2021–2022, we found a pair (male and female) of Entyposis new to science, the description of which is presented below. The presence of this new Somaliland species significantly extends the range of Entyposis in a northeasterly direction towards the Horn of Africa.

Materials and methods

The specimens were examined with a Novex stereomicroscope; measurements were taken with an ocular grid. Length measurements are from the anterior margin of the clypeus to the apex of the elytron. The habitus photographs were taken with a Canon MP-E 65mm/2.8 1–5× macro lens attached to a Canon EOS 90D camera. Partially focused images of each specimen were stacked using the Helicon Focus v. 3.20.2 Pro software.

Specimens in the type series are provided with one red printed label: “Entyposis frici sp. nov., HOLOTYPUS or PARATYPUS [with sex symbol], A. Bezděk and R. Sehnal det. 2023”. Verbatim label data are cited for type material examined. Lines within each label are separated by a vertical slash [|]. Information in quotes indicates the original spelling. Authors’ remarks and additional comments are placed in brackets [].

The following codes identify the collections housing the material examined (curators in round brackets):

BMNH Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom (Maxwell V.L. Barclay, Michael Geiser, Keita Matsumoto);

NMPC Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom (Jiří Hájek);

RSCV Richard Sehnal collection, Velenice, Czech Republic.

All fieldwork in this study complied with legal Somaliland regulations and sampling was in accordance with local legislation (export permit Ref. MOERD/M/I/251/2021).

Material used for comparison:

Entyposis cordipenis Sehnal, 2017. 8 males and 3 females, all paratypes (RSCV, Figs 3, 4, 11, 12, 19, 20, 27, 28, 34, 38): “ETHIOPIA – Hamer or. Turmi near 950 m. | 04°58'31"N 036°30'53"E | 27–30.11.2016 | Vladimír Major leg.”; Ethiopia • 4 males (RSCV), Turmi, Mango Lodge, 920 m, 25.–29.XI.2015, leg. Ströhe.

Entyposis impressa Kolbe, 1894. Kenya • 1 male (RSCV), Shanzu, Mailika, 10.IV.2002 (Figs 5, 13, 21, 29, 35, 39); 2 males and 10 females (BMNH), Garissa Bura, Tana riv., IX.[19]48, leg. van Someren (Figs 6, 14, 22, 30); 1 female (BMNH), Garissa Bura, Ukazzi hill, XII.[19]48, leg. van Someren; 1 female (BMNH), Mombasa, Kilifi, I.[19]42; Tanzania • 1 male (BMNH), Morogoro, 12.I.[19]23.

Entyposis mendax Péringuey, 1904. Kenya • 1 male and 3 females (RSCV), Taveta, 1100 m, 20.XI.2011, leg. Snížek (Figs 7, 8, 15, 16, 23, 24, 31, 32, 36, 40); 1 male (RSCV), Katutu, Kithioko, 27.XI.1999, leg. Snížek; 2 males and 1 female (RSCV), Voi, XI.1997, leg. Snížek; Tanzania • 6 males and 3 females (BMNH), Maktau, XII.[19]36, leg. MacArthur; 2 males (NMPC), Arusha, Naberera, 8.–13.IV.1997, leg. J. Rolčík (NMPC).

Entyposis sp. Somaliland • 1 female (NMPC), Beerato, ca 990 m, 09°21'99"N, 45°03'59"E, 9.–10.VI.2022, leg. David Král & David Sommer (Figs 41–43).

Results

Entyposis frici Bezděk & Sehnal, sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, 9, 10, 17, 18, 25, 26, 33, 37, 44

Type locality

Somaliland, Laascaanood [= Las Anod], 8°29.0535'N, 47°22.6342'E, ca 680 m a.s.l.

Type material

Holotype , male: “Somaliland, 7.-8.x.2021 | LAAS CANOOD [= Las Anod] – Hamdi Hotel | 8.484225N, 47.377236E | ca 680m, Z. Fric lgt.”. Paratype, female, same data as for holotype.

Type depository

Holotype and paratype are deposited in NMPC.

Description of the holotype

Male. Body length 13.6 mm (Fig. 1). Body elongate, strongly convex, surface brown, appendages somewhat lighter, moderately shiny, setation pale. Head and pronotum covered with short, stout, semierect setae; elytra with nearly scale-like setation. Legs and ventral surface with sparse, long, erect setae mixed with much shorter, scale-like setae.

Head, including clypeus, densely coarsely punctate, each puncture with short, stout, semierect seta. Clypeus trasverse, broadly rounded, emarginate at middle (Fig. 9). Frontoclypeal carina broadly arcuate. Occipital carina present, prominent. Eye canthus narrow, long, with sparse, long setation. Eye large, distincly extended beyond canthus. Antenna with 10 antennomeres, club trimerous, slightly shorter than antennal shaft. Antennomere 1 with posterior longitudinal row of erect setae and few isolated erect setae at apex; antennomere 2 bare; antennomeres 3–7 with very few (1–4) isolated setae; club sparsely covered with moderately long, erect setae. Labrum transverse, deeply bilobed; lobes rounded, with coarse irregular punctures bearing long, erect setae. Terminal maxillary palpomere narrow, only slightly expanded apically (Fig. 37), distinctly shorter than palpomeres 1 and 2 combined.

Pronotum transverse, convex, widest at about middle; base broader than anterior margin; with shallow, oval anteromedial depression narrower then head weakly rising toward edge of crest (Figs 17, 25). Anterior margin with well visible tubercle at middle; anterior angles weak, broadly rounded. Lateral margins crenulate, with moderately long setae. Posterior margin with distinct border, very shortly interrupted at middle. Crest delimiting anteromedial depression well visible, with wide V-shaped impunctate strip (Fig. 17) and small impunctate area in basal part of depression. Punctation of remaining surface coarse, somewhat irregular, punctures separated by 1–2× their diameters. Each puncture bearing with short, stout, semirecumbent seta.

Scutellum broadly triangular, sparsely and coarsely punctate in basal half, with short, stout setae; apical area impunctate and bare.

Elytron convex, widest at about middle, sutural angle obtuse-angulate. Striae absent; humeral bones present, weakly swolen, impunctate. Surface of elytron moderately shiny, covered with shallow, regularly spaced punctures, separated by 2–3× puncture diameters. Each puncture bearing with short, recumbent, scale-like seta. Epipleuron distinct, complete, narrow, with row of moderately long erect setae. Apical half of lateral margin of elytron with membranous border.

Figures 1–4. 

Habitus of Entyposis species, dorsal view 1 E. frici sp. nov., holotype, male (body length 13.6 mm) 2 the same, paratype, female (body length 13.3 mm) 3 E. cordipenis Sehnal, 2017, paratype, male (body length 13.5 mm) 4 the same, paratype, female (body length 14.2 mm).

Figures 5–8. 

Habitus of Entyposis species, dorsal view 5 E. impressa Kolbe, 1894, male (body length 15.0 mm) 6 the same, female (body length 16.0 mm) 7 E. mendax Péringuey, 1904, male (body length 11.5 mm) 8 the same, female (body length 10.1 mm).

Figures 9–16. 

Head of Entyposis species, dorsal view 9 E. frici sp. nov., holotype, male 10 the same, paratype, female 11 E. cordipenis Sehnal, 2017, male 12 the same, female 13 E. impressa Kolbe, 1894, male 14 the same, female 15 E. mendax Péringuey, 1904, male 16 the same, female. Not to scale.

Figures 17–24. 

Pronotum of Entyposis species, dorsal view 17 E. frici sp. nov., holotype, male 18 the same, paratype, female 19 E. cordipenis Sehnal, 2017, male 20 the same, female 21 E. impressa Kolbe, 1894, male 22 the same, female 23 E. mendax Péringuey, 1904, male 24 the same, female. Not to scale.

Figures 25–32. 

Pronotum of Entyposis species, lateral view 25 E. frici sp. nov., holotype, male 26 the same, paratype, female 27 E. cordipenis Sehnal, 2017, male 28 the same, female 29 E. impressa Kolbe, 1894, male 30 the same, female 31 E. mendax Péringuey, 1904, male 32 the same, female. Not to scale.

Macropterous.

Legs with femora shiny, irregularly punctate, setaceous; setae of metafemora short, partially scale-like. Protibia narrow, distinctly tridentate; terminal spur present, slightly curved externally, acute apically, basal third serrate, inserted against emargination between medial and apical teeth. Mesotibia and metatibia slightly expanded apically, each with one setiferous transversal carina. Mesotibial terminal spurs subequal in length, flattened, acute apically. Upper terminal spur of metatibia flattened, slightly curved, acute apically, about ¼ longer than lower, apically truncate spur. Tarsomeres narrow, long, with two rows of short erect setae ventrally. Each metatarsomere with longitudinal finely serrate crest ventrally. Claws bifid, with vetrobasal teeth and entire ventral edge of lower claw finely serrate.

Ventral surface of thorax sparsely covered with mixture of moderately long erect setae and recumbent scale-like setae. Abdominal ventrites 3–7 covered with irregular punctures bearing recumbent scale-like setae and few isolated moderately long erect setae. Pygidium large, convex, irregularly punctate with short semirecumbent setae. Lateral and apical margins of pygidium distinctly bordered.

Male genitalia. Parameres symmetrical (Fig. 33), fused basally, longer than phalobase.

Female (Figs 2, 10, 18, 26) differs from male in the following characters: body length 13.3 mm, antennal cbub distinctly shorter then antennomeres 1–7 combined, pronotal anteromedial depression less developed, tarsomeres of all legs shorter.

Differential diagnosis

Entyposis frici sp. nov. belongs to a group of species with a shallow anteromedial depression. In the key of the genus Entyposis (Sehnal 2017), E. frici sp. nov. keys to the couplet with E. cordipenis. The male of E. frici sp. nov. differs from those of E. cordipenis in the shape of the pronotum—the anteromedial depression is only very faintly visible in the lateral view in E. frici sp. nov. (Fig. 25), whereas it is more pronounced in E. cordipenis (Fig. 27). The male genitalia of the two species are different, in E. cordipenis the apical part of the paramere (in dorsal view) is broad (Fig. 34), whereas in E. frici sp. nov. it is narrow (Fig. 33).

Three additional Entyposis species are known from Kenya and northern Tanzania, fairly close to the Horn of Africa: E. impressa, E. mendax, and E. squamulata. Entyposis impressa and E. mendax share a shallow anteromedial depression with E. frici sp. nov. Entyposis impressa is easily distinguished from E. frici sp. nov. by the shape of the male genitalia in both dorsal and lateral views (compare Figs 33 and 35). The differences in the shape of the male genitalia between E. frici sp. nov. and E. mendax are less pronounced (Figs 33 and 36), but both species differ markedly in the shape of the terminal maxillary palpomere, which is elongate in E. frici sp. nov. (Fig. 37), but shorter and apically expanded in E. mendax (Fig. 40).

No specimen of E. squamulata is available to us. This species was described rather recently based on two males only. According to the primary description (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012), males of E. squamulata are clearly distinguished from E. frici sp. nov. by a distinct anteromedial depression and by the shape of the tubercle at the middle of the anterior margin of the pronotum, which is bilobed in E. squamulata but simple in E. frici sp. nov.

Collecting events

Both specimens were attracted by UV light trap and sat on the wall of the Hamdi Hotel (Zdeněk Faltýnek Fric pers. comm. 2022).

Figures 33–36. 

Aedeagus of Entyposis species, dorsal and lateral views 33 E. frici sp. nov., holotype 34 E. cordipenis Sehnal, 2017 35 E. impressa Kolbe, 1894 36 E. mendax Péringuey, 1904. Not to scale.

Etymology

The name of the species is dedicated to Zdeněk Faltýnek Fric, a specialist in the phylogeny and ecology of butterflies, the collector of the type series.

Distribution

The species is known only from the type locality, Laascaanood, Somaliland (Fig. 40).

Remark

Members of Entyposis seem to be rarely collected. Most species are known from a very few specimens, even only from the type series. We have examined about 500 specimens of Schizonychini collected by Czech entomologists in Somaliland during the last four years. Among this rich material, only three specimens of Entyposis were found. In addition to E. frici sp. nov. we discovered a single female of probably undescribed Entyposis from Beerato (Figs 4144). We have postponed its description until more specimens, including males, are available.

Figures 37–40. 

Terminal maxillary palpomere of Entyposis species 37 E. frici sp. nov. 38 E. cordipenis Sehnal, 2017 39 E. impressa Kolbe, 1894 40 E. mendax Péringuey, 1904. Not to scale.

Figures 41–43. 

Female of probably undescribed Entyposis species from Beerato (Somaliland) (length 15.0 mm) 41 habitus, dorsal view 42 pronotum, dorsal view 43 pronotum, lateral view. Not to scale.

Figure 44. 

Geographic distribution of Entyposis species in the Horn of Africa based on specimens examined.

Key to the species of Entyposis from northeastern Africa, males only

1 Tubercle at middle of anterior margin of pronotum bilobed E. squamulata Lacroix & Montreuil, 2012
Tubercle at middle of anterior margin of pronotum simple 2
2 Anteromedial depression of pronotum shalow and very faintly visible in lateral view (Figs 25, 29, 31) 3
Anteromedial depression of pronotum more distinctly pronounced in lateral view (Fig. 27) E. cordipenis Sehnal, 2017
3 Narrow tip of male paramera (lateral view) very short (Fig. 35) E. impressa Kolbe, 1894
Narrow tip of male paramera (lateral view) distinctly longer (Figs 33, 36) 4
4 Terminal maxillary palpomere elongate (Fig. 37) E. frici sp. nov.
Terminal maxillary palpomere expanded apically (Fig. 40) E. mendax Péringuey, 1904

Checklist of the genus Entyposis

Entyposis Kolbe, 1894 (type species Schizonycha cavicollis Fairmaire, 1887; subsequent designation by Lacroix and Montreuil 2012)

= Proseconius Kolbe, 1894 (type species Schizonycha capito Gerstaecker, 1873; monotypy); synonymized by Sehnal (2019).

Entyposis bidentata Lacroix & Montreuil, 2012

Distribution. Mozambique (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Entyposis capito (Gerstaecker, 1873)

= Schizonycha cavicollis Fairmaire, 1887; synonymized by Sehnal (2019).

Distribution. Tanzania, including Zanzibar Island (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012; Sehnal 2019).

Entyposis cordipenis Sehnal, 2017

Distribution. Southern Ethiopia (Sehnal 2017).

Entyposis excavata Lacroix & Montreuil, 2012

Distribution. Tanzania (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Entyposis frici Bezděk & Sehnal, sp. nov.

Distribution. Somaliland (this paper).

Entyposis impressa Kolbe, 1894

Distribution. Kenya, Tanzania (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Entyposis madogolelei Lacroix & Montreuil, 2012

Distribution. Mozambique (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Entyposis martinezi Lacroix & Montreuil, 2012

Distribution. Mozambique (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Entyposis mendax Péringuey, 1904

= Schizonycha nyukana Kolbe, 1910; synonymized by Lacroix and Montreuil (2012).

= Entyposis montana Moser, 1913; synonymized by Lacroix and Montreuil (2012).

Distribution. Kenya, Tanzania, Zimbabwe (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Entyposis rasplusi Lacroix & Montreuil, 2012

Distribution. Mozambique (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Entyposis squamulata Lacroix & Montreuil, 2012

Distribution. Kenya, Tanzania (Lacroix and Montreuil 2012).

Acknowledgements

We thank all colleagues and institutions listed in the Materials and methods section for enabling us to study the material in their care. Furthermore, we would like to thank the Amoud University management, namely, the president Suleiman A. Guled and the vice president of academic affair Mohamed Muse Jibril. In addition, we would like to thank the Minister Shukri H. Ismail and Abdinasir Hussein Saed from the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, Somaliland for supporting our activities in Somaliland. Christopher Steer (University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic) kindly improved the English of the manuscript. Lastly, we thank two anonymous reviewers and editor (Andrey V. Frolov) for their comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript. Work of D. Sommer was supported by the SVV project (260571/2022).

Additional information

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest was declared.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

Aleš Bezděk: conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); funding acquisition (equal); supervision (equal); investigation (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Richard Sehnal: conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Hassan S.A. Elmi: writing – review and editing (equal). David Sommer: project administration (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). David Král: funding acquisition (equal); project administration (equal); supervision (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal).

Author ORCIDs

Aleš Bezděk https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-3281

Richard Sehnal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-9132

Hassan S. A. Elmi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-8170

David Sommer https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4519-9677

David Král http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-7892

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Lacroix M, Montreuil O (2012) Révision du genre Entyposis Kolbe, 1894 (Insecta, Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Melolonthidae). Zoosystema 34(4): 721–735. https://doi.org/10.5252/z2012n4a4
  • Sehnal R (2019) Proseconius Kolbe, 1895—a new junior subjective synonym of Entyposis Kolbe, 1895 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae: Schizonychini). In: Kubík Š, Barták M (Eds) 11th workshop on biodiveristy, Jevany. Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v Praze, Prague, 149–152.
login to comment