Research Article
Print
Research Article
Two new species of Sinopoda from China, with first description of the male of S. horizontalis Zhong, Cao & Liu, 2017 (Araneae, Sparassidae)
expand article infoJianshuang Zhang, Yuanqian Xing§, Jinghui Yang§, Hao Yu§, Yang Zhong|
‡ Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China
§ Guizhou Education University, Guiyang, China
| Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, China
¶ Administrative Commission of Jiugongshan National Nature Reserve of Hubei Xianning, Xianning, China
Open Access

Abstract

Three species of spider genus Sinopoda Jäger, 1999 are reported from southern China. Two of them are described as new to science: S. guiyang Zhang, Yu & Zhong, sp. nov. and S. xishui Zhang, Yu & Zhong, sp. nov., both from Guizhou Province. The male of S. horizontalis Zhong, Cao & Liu, 2017 is described for the first time based on new material from the type locality, Wuyishan National Nature Reserve, Fujian Province, China. Detailed descriptions, diagnoses, photographs and a distribution map of the three species are provided.

Keywords

Huntsman spider, morphology, new species, southern China, taxonomy

Introduction

Sinopoda Jäger, 1999 is the fourth most species-rich genus of huntsman spider family Sparassidae after Pseudopoda Jäger, 2000 (251 species), Heteropoda Latreille, 1804 (189 species), and Olios Walckenaer, 1837 (166 species) (World Spider Catalog 2023; Zhang et al. 2023), including 139 species so far. Sinopoda is mainly distributed in eastern Asia, with 86 species recorded from East Asia, 50 species reported from Southeast Asia, and a single species described from India (Zhang et al. 2021; Zhong et al. 2022). Currently, a total of 73 Sinopoda species are known from China, representing 52.5% of the global species, making China the country with the most Sinopoda species (Zhang et al. 2021; Zhong et al. 2022; World Spider Catalog 2023). Despite this fact, the diversity of this genus in China is still not fully discovered as several new species have been described in each of the last few years (Zhong et al. 2017, 2018, 2019, 2022; Grall and Jäger 2020; Zhu et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2021).

While examining spiders collected from southern China, we have found some Sinopoda specimens that belong to three species: two of them from Guizhou Province, belong to undescribed species new to science; the remaining one from Wuyishan National Nature Reserve of Fujian Province, was identified as Sinopoda horizontalis Zhong, Cao & Liu, 2017 based on comparison with the type specimens (previously described based on a holotype female only). The goal of this paper is to describe the two new species under the names of S. guiyang Zhang, Yu & Zhong, sp. nov. and S. xishui Zhang, Yu & Zhong, sp. nov. and to redescribe S. horizontalis, describing the male for the first time.

Materials and methods

Specimens in this study were collected by hand. The type specimens are deposited in the Museum of Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China. Specimens were preserved in 75 or 95% alcohol and examined using an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope. Left male palps were examined and illustrated after dissection. Epigynes were removed and cleared in a warm 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. The vulva was imaged after being embedded in Arabic gum. Images were captured with a Canon EOS 70D digital camera (20.2 megapixels) mounted on an Olympus CX41 compound microscope, and assembled using Helicon Focus ver. 6.80 image stacking software. All measurements were obtained using an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope and are given in millimetres. Eye diameters were measured at the widest part. The total body length does not include the chelicerae or spinnerets. Leg lengths are given as total length (femur, patella + tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). Numbers of macrosetae are listed for each segment in the following order: prolateral, dorsal, retrolateral and ventral (in femora and patellae ventral spines are absent and fourth digit is omitted in the setation formula). The distribution map was generated with ArcGIS ver. 10.5 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.). The terminology used in the text and figure legends follows Grall and Jäger (2020) and Zhong et al. (2019, 2022), and the abbreviations used in the text or figures are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

List of abbreviations used in the text or figures.

Male palp
C = conductor EA = embolic apophysis
Cy = cymbium EB = embolic base
RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis Sp = spermophor
dRTA = dorsal branch of RTA St = subtegulum
vRTA = ventral branch of RTA T = tegulum
E = embolus
Epigyne
AB = anterior band LL = lateral lobe
FD = fertilization duct LS = lobal septum
GA = glandular appendage MS = membranous sac
ID = internal duct PP = posterior part of spermathecae
Ocular area
AER = anterior eye row CH = clypeus height
ALE = anterior lateral eye PER = posterior eye row
AME = anterior median eye PLE = posterior lateral eye
AME–ALE = distance between AME and ALE PME = posterior median eye
AME–AME = distance between AMEs PME–PLE = distance between PME and PLE
AME–PLE = distance between AME and PLE PME–PME = distance between PMEs
AME–PME = distance between AME and PME

Taxonomy

Family Sparassidae Bertkau, 1872

Subfamily Heteropodinae Thorell, 1873

Sinopoda Jäger, 1999

Type species

Sarotes forcipatus Karsch, 1881 from China and Japan.

Diagnosis

See Jäger (1999), Liu et al. (2008), Zhang et al. (2015) and Grall and Jäger (2020).

Composition and infrageneric groupings

See WSC (2023) and Zhang et al. (2021).

Sinopoda guiyang Zhang, Yu & Zhong, sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, 3, 9

Type material

Holotype ♂ (YHSPA001), China: Guizhou Province: Guiyang City: Xinpu Town, Xiangzhigou, Nanjing temple, 26.75°N, 106.93°E, c. 1092 m, by hand, 14.VI.2017, H. Yu et al. leg. Paratypes: 2♂3♀ (YHSPA002–006), same data as holotype.

Etymology

The species name is derived from the name of the type locality; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

The males of new species resemble those of S. ovata Zhong, Jäger, Chen & Liu, 2019 and S. triangula Liu, Li & Jäger, 2008 in having a short vRTA with rough apex, and a long, finger-like dRTA (Fig. 1A, B, D; Zhong et al. 2019: figs 43B, C, 44B, C; Liu et al. 2008: fig. 7B, C), but differ by: (1) subdistal embolus without triangular projection (vs. with a triangular projection) (cf. Figs 1A, D, 2A–C and Zhong et al. 2019: figs 43A, B, 44A, B and Liu et al. 2008: fig. 7A, B, D–F); (2) embolus whip-like or filiform, distinctly thin (vs. relatively thicker, distally wide) (cf. Figs 1A, D, 2A–C and Zhong et al. 2019: figs 43A, B, 44A, B and Liu et al. 2008: fig. 7A, B, D–F); (3) apex of vRTA with four ridges (vs. without ridges) (cf. Fig. 1D and Zhong et al. 2019: figs 43C, 44C and Liu et al. 2008: fig. 7C). Females also resemble those of S. ovata and S. triangula by the general shape of vulva but can be recognized by the thumb-like glandular appendages extend transversally (vs. finger-like and descend obliquely) (cf. Fig. 3C and Zhong et al. 2019: figs 43E, 45B and Liu et al. 2008: fig. 7H).

Figure 1. 

Male palp of the holotype of Sinopoda guiyang sp. nov. A ventral view B dorsal view C prolateral view D retrolateral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; Cy = cymbium; dRTA = dorsal branch of RTA; E = embolus; EA = embolic apophysis; EB = embolic base; Sp = spermophor; St = subtegulum; T = tegulum; vRTA = ventral branch of RTA. Scale bar: 0.5 mm (equal for A–D).

Description

Male (YHSPA001). Total length 8.4. Prosoma 4.0 long, 3.4 wide, anterior width of prosoma 2.6. Opisthosoma 4.4 long, 2.6 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.18, ALE 0.26, PME 0.18, PLE 0.27, AME–AME 0.19, AME–ALE 0.09, PME–PME 0.24, PME–PLE 0.35, AME–PME 0.33, ALEPLE 0.28, CH AME 0.21, CH ALE 0.23. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 1021; Fe: I–III 323, IV 321; Pa: I–IV 101; Ti: I 2024, II–III 2126, IV 2226; Mt: I–II 2024, III–IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 6.3 (2.2, 1.3, 1.1, 1.7), I 15.5 (3.8, 1.9, 4.4, 4.0, 1.4), II 17.5 (4.8, 1.9, 4.7, 4.5, 1.6), III 14.1 (4.4, 1.5, 3.6, 3.3, 1.3), IV 15.4 (4.4, 1.7, 3.6, 4.1, 1.6). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth, and with ~ 35 denticles.

Colouration in ethanol (Fig. 2D, E). Prosoma yellowish-brown, anteriorly and medially yellowish, lateral and posterior margin dark brown, with shallow fovea and radial furrows. Chelicerae light brown. Sternum yellowish-white, margin yellowish. Endites and labium uniformly yellowish-white. Legs dark yellowish-brown, covered by short spines. Opisthosoma oval, dorsum brown, marginally with two longitudinal and dark brown bands reaching posterior half, median part with four pairs of inconspicuous purplish dots; venter uniformly gray.

Figure 2. 

Sinopoda guiyang sp. nov., male holotype, palpal bulb (A–C) and habitus (D, E) A prolateral view B ventral view C retrolateral view D dorsal view E ventral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; E = embolus; EA = embolic apophysis; EB = embolic base; Sp = spermophor; St = subtegulum; T = tegulum. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (equal for A–C); 2 mm (equal for D, E).

Palp (Figs 1, 2A–C). Cymbium distinctly longer than tibia. Embolus filiform, Ƨ-shaped in ventral view, arising at approximately the 8–9 o’clock position, terminating at c. 12 o’clock position. Conductor long, membranous, c. 2/3 of the tegulum length, originating at 12–1 o’clock position portion of tegulum. Tegulum oval, slightly bulged, medially with distinct and slightly curved spermophore, proximally covering embolic base. RTA arising mesially to distally from tibia, ventrally with distinct brush of stiff setae. dRTA slender, finger-shaped; vRTA round, apex with four ridges.

Female (YHSPA002). Total length 10.3. Prosoma 4.2 long, 3.6 wide, anterior width of prosoma 2.8. Opisthosoma 6.1 long, 4.6 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.17, ALE 0.24, PME 0.20, PLE 0.29, AME–AME 0.21, AME–ALE 0.10, PME–PME 0.27, PME–PLE 0.39, AME–PME 0.39, ALEPLE 0.34, CH AME 0.23, CH ALE 0.26. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2026, 1014; Fe: I–III 323, IV 321; Pa: I–IV 000; Ti: I–III 2026, IV 2126; Mt: I–II 1014, III 2026, IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 5.0 (1.5, 0.9, 1.0, 1.6), I 12.2 (3.3, 1.5, 3.0, 3.2, 1.2), II 12.7 (3.8, 1.8, 3.2, 2.8, 1.1), III 10.3 (3.0, 1.6, 2.7, 2.1, 0.9), IV 11.9 (3.5, 1.7, 2.9, 2.7, 1.1). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth, and with ~ 42 denticles. Colouration in ethanol as in males, but generally slightly darker (Fig. 3D, E).

Figure 3. 

Sinopoda guiyang sp. nov., female paratype, epigyne (A–C) and habitus (D, E) A intact, ventral view B cleared and macerated, ventral view C cleared and macerated, dorsal view D dorsal view E ventral view. AB = anterior band; FD = fertilization duct; GA = glandular appendage; ID = internal duct; LL = lateral lobe; LS = lobal septum; MS = membranous sac; PP = posterior part of spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (equal for A–C); 2 mm (equal for D, E).

Copulatory organ (Fig. 3A–C). Epigynal field wider than long, with short and indistinct anterior bands, slit sensillum absent. Lobal septum wide, anterior part about 1/10 width of epigynal plate, gradually wider to the posterior. Lateral lobes fused, with small median incision and posterior margin slightly bilobed. Internal ducts running parallel along median line. Glandular appendages thumb-like, extend transversally. Posterior part of spermathecae balloon-shaped, relatively large, c. 1.6 times longer than wide; the two PP separated by about 0.8 width. Fertilization ducts acicular, membranous, located on dorsal-basal surface of spermathecae. Membranous sac between fertilization ducts, more or less triangular.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Guiyang City, Guizhou, China (Fig. 9).

Comments

Sinopoda guiyang sp. nov. possesses several characters associated with the globosa-group (currently comprises six species, see Zhang et al. 2021: 15, fig. 4) and resembles S. ovata and S. triangula (the core species of the globosa-group) for their characteristic genital organs (for a detailed diagnosis, see above), but can be distinguished from all members of the globosa-group by the absence of triangular projection in the embolus. Because the embolus of all S. globosa-group species has a subdistally triangular projection, there remains considerable uncertainty about placing this new species into the globosa-group.

Figure 4. 

Male palp of the topotype of Sinopoda horizontalis A ventral view B dorsal view C prolateral view D retrolateral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; Cy = cymbium; dRTA = dorsal branch of RTA; E = embolus; EA = embolic apophysis; EB = embolic base; Sp = spermophor; St = subtegulum; T = tegulum; vRTA = ventral branch of RTA. Scale bar: 1 mm (equal for A–D).

Sinopoda horizontalis Zhong, Cao & Liu, 2017

Figs 4, 5, 6, 9

Sinopoda horizontalis Zhong, Cao & Liu, 2017: 157, figs 5A, B, 6A, B, 15A, B (♀).

Holotype examined

♀ (ZY-2013-SPA007), China: Fujian Province: Wuyishan City, Wuyishan National Nature Reserve, 27.35°N, 117.29°E, c. 1152 m, by hand, 16 VI 2013, Y. Zhong and X.W. Cao leg.

New material examined

3♂, 1♀ (ZY-2021-SPA011–014). Same locality as holotype, by hand, 16.VI.2021, Y. Zhong leg.

Diagnosis

Males of S. horizontalis resemble those of S. hamata (Fox, 1937) and S. liui Zhong, Cao & Liu, 2017 in the general shape of the male palp. The palps of the three species share the similarly shaped conductor and embolus, and the distinctly long, ribbon-shaped dRTA which with lumpy margins, but differ in the following: the vRTA digitiform, distinctly longer than wide, apex blunt in S. horizontalis (vs. laminar, distinctly wider than long in S. hamata, thumb-shaped, apex beak-shaped and relatively sharper in S. liui) (cf. Fig. 4A, B, D and Zhong et al. 2018: figs 6C, 7C and Zhong et al. 2019: figs 31C, 32C). Females also resemble those of S. hamata and S. liui in having the strongly narrow lobal septum anteriorly, and the distinctly bilobed posterior margin of epigynal plate, but can be recognised from S. hamata by the internal ducts running parallel along median line (vs. convergent anteriorly but distinctly oblique posteriorly) (cf. Fig. 6C–F and Zhong et al. 2018: figs 6D, E, 7D, E); and from S. liui can be recognised by the posterior part of spermathecae are proportionately longer, nearly 2/5 length of internal ducts (vs. proportionately much shorter, no more than 1/4 length of internal ducts) (cf. Fig. 6C–F and Zhong et al. 2019: fig. 33B and Zhong et al. 2017: figs 5D, 6D).

Description

Male (ZY-2021-SPA011). Total length 14.8. Prosoma 7.0 long, 6.7 wide, anterior width of prosoma 3.4. Opisthosoma 7.8 long, 5.2 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.24, ALE 0.45, PME 0.22, PLE 0.50, AME–AME 0.21, AME–ALE 0.13, PME–PME 0.41, PME–PLE 0.38, AME–PME 0.48, ALEPLE 0.40, CH AME 0.29, CH ALE 0.35. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 1021; Fe: I–III 323, IV 321; Pa: I–IV 101; Ti: I–IV 2226; Mt: I–II 1014, III 2026, IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 9.7 (2.8, 2.0, 2.1, 2.8), I 34.0 (9.9, 3.8, 8.4, 8.9, 3.0), II 35.8 (10.6, 3.8, 9.0, 9.5, 2.9), III 27.7 (7.8, 3.6, 7.2, 7.0, 2.1), IV 28.9 (8.6, 3.1, 7.0, 7.7, 2.5). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth, and with ~ 32 denticles.

Colouration in ethanol (Fig. 5D, E). Prosoma dark yellowish to brown, with yellow submarginal transversal band at posterior part. Median band of prosoma bright yellowish-brown, lateral bands brown and not distinctly delimited to median band. Fovea and radial furrows distinctly marked. Chelicerae dark reddish-brown. Sternum light yellow, margin slightly darker. Endites and labium yellowish, both with distal parts brighter. Legs dark yellowish-brown, covered by short spines. Dorsal opisthosoma brown, with an irregular yellow media band, reaching 2/3 of abdomen length, with five pairs of inconspicuous black dots on each side; ventral opisthosoma yellowish-brown with irregular pattern and two longitudinal yellow lines between epigastric furrow and spinnerets.

Figure 5. 

Sinopoda horizontalis, male topotype, palpal bulb (A–C) and habitus (D, E) A prolateral view B ventral view C retrolateral view D dorsal view E ventral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; E = embolus; EA = embolic apophysis; EB = embolic base; Sp = spermophor; St = subtegulum; T = tegulum. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (equal for A–C); 5 mm (equal for D, E).

Palp (Figs 4, 5A–C). Cymbium distinctly longer than tibia. Embolus filiform, Ƨ-shaped, arising from tegulum at nearly the 7–8 o’clock position in ventral view, terminating at c. 12 o’clock position. Conductor long, c. 2/3 of the tegulum length, curving medially, arising at 12- 1o’clock position from tegulum. Tegulum oval, slightly bulged, medially with distinct spermophore, proximally covering embolic base; spermophore <-shaped in ventral view. RTA arising mesially to distally from tibia, ventrally with distinct brush of stiff setae. dRTA ribbon-shaped, distinctly long, curved and tapering, almost extending media part of cymbium; vRTA digitiform, relatively short, about 1/2 of tibia length, apex round.

Female (ZY-2021-SPA014). Total length 14.9. Prosoma 7.6 long, 7.3 wide, anterior width of prosoma 4.5. Opisthosoma 9.3 long, 5.8 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.30, ALE 0.48, PME 0.36, PLE 0.58, AME–AME 0.25, AME–ALE 0.17, PME–PME 0.45, PME–PLE 0.61, AME–PME 0.62, ALEPLE 0.66, CH AME 0.31, CH ALE 0.45. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2121, 1014; Fe: I–III 323, IV 321; Pa: I–IV 101; Ti: I–III 2024, IV 2124; Mt: I–II 1014, III 2026, IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 9.6 (2.8, 1.4, 2.2, 3.2), I 24.3 (6.3, 2.6, 6.3, 6.6, 2.5), II 25.9 (8.3, 3.3, 7.1, 5.2, 2.0), III 20.2 (7.7, 3.4, 3.6, 3.8, 1.7), IV 22.2 (7.1, 2.5, 5.8, 4.9, 1.9). Leg formula: II-IV-III-I. Cheliceral furrow with three anterior and four posterior teeth, and with ~ 40 denticles. Colouration in ethanol as in males, but body slightly darker (Fig. 6A, B; see Zhong et al. (2017) for others described). Copulatory organ as in Fig. 6C, D (topotype) and Fig. 6E, F (holotype).

Figure 6. 

Sinopoda horizontalis, habitus (A, B) and epigyne (C, D) of female topotype, and epigyne (E, F) of female holotype A dorsal view B ventral view C, E cleared and macerated, ventral view D, F cleared and macerated, dorsal view. AB = anterior band; FD = fertilization duct; GA = glandular appendage; ID = internal duct; LL = lateral lobe; LS = lobal septum; MS = membranous sac; PP = posterior part of spermathecae. Scale bars: 5 mm (equal for A, B); 0.5 mm (equal for C, D, equal for E, F).

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Wuyishan National Nature Reserve, Fujian, China (Fig. 9).

Sinopoda xishui Zhang, Yu & Zhong, sp. nov.

Figs 7, 8, 9

Type material

Holotype ♀ (YHSPA007), China: Guizhou Province: Zunyi City: Xishui County, Xishui National Nature Reserve, Sanchahe Town, Hongyangou Village, 28.50°N, 106.40°E, c. 934 m, by hand, 23.V.2022, H. Yu et al. leg. Paratype: 1♀, same data as holotype.

Etymology

The species name is derived from the name of the type locality; noun in apposition.

Diagnosis

Females of this new species resembles those of S. yaanensis Zhong, Jäger, Chen & Liu, 2019 in having similar vulva with swollen, globular glandular appendages, and oval shaped posterior part of spermathecae, but can be distinguished by: (1) lobal septum distinctly wider, its anterior part about 1/5 width of epigynal plate (Fig. 7A, B) (vs. relatively narrower, its anterior part about 1/8–1/9 width of epigynal plate; Zhang et al. 2015: figs 40, 46; Zhong et al. 2019: fig. 57E); and (2) the anterior part of internal ducts far from the anterior margin of epigynal plate (Fig. 7C) (vs. reach the anterior margin of epigynal plate; Zhang et al. 2015: fig. 41; Zhong et al. 2019: fig. 57J).

Figure 7. 

Sinopoda xishui sp. nov., female holotype, epigyne (A–C) and habitus (D, E) A macerated, ventral view B cleared and macerated, ventral view C cleared and macerated, dorsal view D dorsal view E ventral view. FD = fertilization duct; GA = glandular appendage; ID = internal duct; LL = lateral lobe; LS = lobal septum; MS = membranous sac; PP = posterior part of spermathecae. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (equal for A–C); 3 mm (equal for D, E).

Description

Female (YHSPA007). Total length 16.4. Prosoma 7.7 long, 6.8 wide, anterior width of prosoma 4.2. Opisthosoma 8.7 long, 6.1 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.35, ALE 0.44, PME 0.38, PLE 0.48, AME–AME 0.28, AME–ALE 0.14, PME–PME 0.44, PME–PLE 0.53, AME–PME 0.52, ALEPLE 1.44, CH AME 0.32, CH ALE 0.37. Spination: Palp: 131, 101, 2121, 1014; Fe: I–III 323, IV 321; Pa: I–IV 101; Ti: I–III 2026, IV 2126; Mt: I–II 1014, III 2026, IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 9.8 (3.0, 1.6, 2.1, 3.1), I 26.8 (7.8, 2.4, 7.8, 6.5, 2.3), II 29.1 (8.9, 2.8, 8.2, 7.1, 2.1), III 24.2 (7.6, 3.1, 6.3, 5.1, 2.1), IV 24.7 (6.7, 2.4, 7.3, 6.1, 2.2). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Cheliceral furrow with two anterior and four posterior teeth, and with ~ 38 denticles.

Colour of the living holotype female was uniformly dark except brown femur (Fig. 8A). Colouration in ethanol (Fig. 7D, E): Prosoma dark yellowish to brown, with bright yellow submarginal transversal band at posterior part. Median band of prosoma bright yellowish, anteriorly as wide as PER, gradually narrowing posteriorly; lateral bands brown, distinctly delimited to median band, starting from PLE, reaching dark reddish submarginal transversal band. Fovea and radial furrows distinctly marked. Chelicerae yellowish-brown. Sternum bright yellow, margin slightly darker. Endites and labium yellowish. Legs yellowish-brown, covered by short spines. Dorsal opisthosoma dark brown, anteriorly with a small ‘)(‘-shaped yellow pattern, with three pairs of inconspicuous dots on each side; ventral opisthosoma dark, with several transversal folds.

Figure 8. 

Sinopoda xishui sp. nov., female holotype (A) and paratype (B), live specimens. Photographs by Qianle Lu (Shenzhen, Guangdong).

Copulatory organ (Fig. 7A–C). Epigynal field wider than long, anterior bands nearly invisible indistinct, slit sensillum absent. Lobal septum wide, anterior part about 1/5 width of epigynal plate, gradually wider to the posterior. Lateral lobes fused, posterior margin slightly bilobed, medially with small incision. Internal ducts running parallel along the middle line. Glandular appendages distinctly inflated, globular; the two GA widely separated by about 3× diameters. Posterior part of spermathecae more or less bean-shaped, c. 1.9 times longer than wide; the two PP separated by about 2.3 width. Fertilization ducts acicular, membranous, located on posterior surface of spermathecae. Membranous sac between fertilization ducts, nearly trapezoidal.

Male. Unknown.

Distribution

Known only from the type locality, Xishui National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China (Fig. 9).

Figure 9. 

Distribution records of the Sinopoda species treated in this paper: S. horizontalis Zhong, Cao & Liu, 2017 (orange circle: Fujian Province: Wuyishan City, Wuyishan National Nature Reserve), S. guiyang sp. nov. (blue circle: Guizhou Province, Guiyang City, Xinpu Town, Xiangzhigou), S. xishui sp. nov. (red circle: Guizhou Province, Zunyi City, Xishui National Nature Reserve).

Comments

The females of S. xishui sp. nov. exhibit typical globosa-group features (internal ducts running parallel along median line, and with ovate posterior parts of spermathecae, as diagnosed in Zhang et al. (2021)), and resembles S. yaanensis (the core species of the globosa-group) (for a detailed diagnosis, see above). However, this species is not readily assignable to the globosa-group due to the lack of an available male specimen.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jie Liu (Wuhan, China), and Tamás Szűts (Budapest, Hungary) for providing constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We are especially grateful to Gergin Blagoev (Guelph, Canada), the subject editor of this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC-32060113/31702006/32000303), the Natural Science Foundation of Guizhou Province (J [2020] 1Y081), the Project of Biodiversity Survey and Assessment in Guiyang (GZZC-2021-018), the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Karst Science Research Center of Guizhou Province (Grant No. U1812401), the Natural Sciences Foundation of Xianning City (2022ZRKX063), the Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hubei Province (Q20222806), and the program of Hubei University of Science and Technology (2021ZX12), the Guizhou Education University Academic Discipline Project (2019YLPYXKB01), the Second Scientific Expedition Project of Xishui National Nature Reserve, and Guizhou provincial first-class major (biological science) project (Education department of Guizhou Province [2019] 46).

References

  • Grall E, Jäger P (2020) Forty-seven new species of Sinopoda from Asia with a considerable extension of the distribution range to the south and description of a new species group (Sparassidae: Heteropodinae). Zootaxa 4797(1): 1–101. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4797.1.1
  • Jäger P (1999) Sinopoda, a new genus of Heteropodinae (Araneae, Sparassidae) from Asia. The Journal of Arachnology 27: 19–24.
  • Liu J, Li SQ, Jäger P (2008) New cave-dwelling huntsman spider species of the genus Sinopoda (Araneae: Sparassidae) from southern China. Zootaxa 1857(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1857.1.1
  • World Spider Catalog WSC (2023) World Spider Catalog, version 24.0. Natural History Museum, Bern. https://doi.org/10.24436/2 [Accessed on 02 April 2023]
  • Zhang H, Zhong Y, Zhu Y, Agnarsson I, Liu J (2021) A molecular phylogeny of the Chinese Sinopoda spiders (Sparassidae, Heteropodinae): implications for taxonomy. PeerJ 9: e11775. [26 pp] https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11775
  • Zhang H, Zhu Y, Zhong Y, Jäger P, Liu J (2023) A taxonomic revision of the spider genus Pseudopoda Jäger, 2000 (Araneae: Sparassidae) from East, South and Southeast Asia. Megataxa 9(1): 1–304. https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.9.1.1
  • Zhong Y, Zeng MY, Gu CL, Yu HL, Yang JY (2022) A new species of Sinopoda from China, with first description of the male of S. wuyiensis Liu, 2021 (Araneae, Sparassidae). ZooKeys 1116: 121–132. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1116.85303
  • Zhu Y, Zhong Y, Yang TB (2020) One new species of the genus Sinopoda from Hubei Province, with description of the male of Sinopoda angulata (Araneae, Sparassidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 8: e55377. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e55377
login to comment