Research Article
Print
Research Article
Integrative taxonomic revision of the genera Nesticella and Howaia in Japan with the description of five new species (Araneae, Nesticidae, Nesticellini)
expand article infoFrancesco Ballarin§, Katsuyuki Eguchi|
‡ Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
§ Museo di Storia Naturale of Verona, Verona, Italy
| Nagasaki University, Nagasaki City, Japan
Open Access

Abstract

The Japanese species of the genera Nesticella Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980 and Howaia Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980 (Araneae, Nesticidae, Nesticellini) are revised using an integrative taxonomic approach. Their morphology, phylogenetic position within the genera, assignment to species groups, and distribution in mainland Japan and the Ryukyu islands are discussed herein. A phylogenetic and species delimitation analysis was conducted to confirm the boundaries between the putative species that were initially discriminated based on external and genital morphology. As a result of the present study, six species of Nesticella and three species of Howaia are proposed for the fauna of Japan based on the combined results of morphology and molecular analyses. Male and female of the previously known species H. mogera (Yaginuma, 1972), N. brevipes (Yaginuma, 1970), and N. okinawaensis (Yaginuma, 1979) are redescribed and illustrated using type specimens or specimens collected at the type locality. Nesticella terrestris (Yaginuma, 1970) is resurrected as a valid species and distinguished from the closely related N. brevipes based on morphological and molecular evidence. The male of N. terrestris is described for the first time. We herein describe three new species of Nesticella and two new species of Howaia from different islands in the Ryukyu Archipelago, southwest Japan: N. insulana sp. nov. (♂, ♀) from Yonaguni-jima Island, N. occulta sp. nov. (♀) from Ishigaki-jima Island, N. silvicola sp. nov. (♂, ♀) from Yakushima Island, H. alba sp. nov. (♂, ♀) from Miyako-jima Island and H. subterranea sp. nov. (♀) from Okinoerabu-jima Island. Nesticella occulta sp. nov., H. alba sp. nov. and H. subterranea sp. nov. dwell exclusively in caves and show extensive morphological adaptation to subterranean life.

Key words

COI, phylogeny, Ryukyus, species delimitation, subterranean environment, troglobiont

Introduction

Nesticidae Simon, 1894 is a relatively small family of scaffold-web spiders currently including 282 species assigned to 16 genera with a nearly worldwide distribution (World Spider Catalog 2023). These spiders often show troglophilic preferences and are frequently associated with caves or other dark and humid habitats. The taxonomy and phylogeny of this family has received increasing interest in the last decade by international arachnologists resulting in the publication of numerous new studies (e.g., Liu and Li 2013; Ballarin and Li 2015, 2018; Grall and Jäger 2016; Lin et al. 2016; Pavlek and Ribera 2017; Ribera 2018; Ballarin 2020; Suzuki and Ballarin 2020; Esyunin and Efimik 2022; Fomichev et al. 2022; Ramírez et al. 2022; Zigler and Milne 2022; Hedin and Milne 2023; Ribera and Dimitrov 2023; Sherwood et al. 2023). Such efforts have allowed the description of several new taxa and a progressive revision and redefinition of the family.

The tribe Nesticellini Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980, also known as “short-legged” nesticids, currently includes two main genera: Nesticella Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980 and Howaia Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980. Nesticella is the second largest genus among Nesticidae (World Spider Catalog 2023) and it shows considerable heterogeneity in the shape of male palp and female epigyne. Currently Nesticella involves 66 valid species provisionally grouped into four species groups (sensu Lin et al. 2016) based on the morphology of the genitalia. Such diversity, together with the results of preliminary molecular analysis, suggests that Nesticella is potentially paraphyletic and that its classification still needs a comprehensive revision (Lin et al. 2016; Ballarin and Li 2018, see also Lehtinen and Saaristo 1980). In this regard, just recently eight species of the Nesticella mogera group (sensu Lin et al. 2016) have been transferred to the revalidated genus Howaia by Sherwood et al. (2023). Although also distributed in South America, Africa, Europe (introduced), and Oceania, Nesticellini spiders have the greatest taxonomic and ecologic diversity in Asia, where the vast majority of the known species occur (52 species, ~80% of the total) (Lin et al. 2016; World Spider Catalog 2023). The Nesticella and Howaia fauna of China and Indochina has been progressively explored in recent years leading to the discovery of several new species and allowing a better understanding of their phylogenetic relationships (Liu and Li 2013; Zhang and Li 2013; Ballarin and Li 2015, 2018; Grall and Jäger 2016; Lin et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2022). However, the species distributed in other regions of the Asian continent and adjacent islands and archipelagos have generally been poorly investigated and often neglected. Among the Asian regions where the nesticid fauna is still poorly known are South Asia and the Malay, Philippines, and the Japanese archipelagos.

Currently, 59 species and subspecies assigned to six genera of Nesticidae have been recorded in mainland Japan, the Ryukyus, and other surrounding islands (Suzuki and Ballarin 2020; Tanikawa 2023; World Spider Catalog 2023). This means that Japan alone hosts more than 20% of the worldwide nesticid species, making it one of the hotspots of diversity for this family. Nevertheless, only two species of Nesticella and one of Howaia are currently reported on the Japanese islands: Nesticella brevipes (Yaginuma, 1970), N. okinawaensis (Yaginuma, 1979), and H. mogera (Yaginuma, 1972). Nesticella brevipes and H. mogera are broadly recorded across mainland Japan and nearby countries, including China, Korea, and the Russian Far East (Shinkai et al. 2022; World Spider Catalog 2023). In contrast, N. okinawaensis is distributed only on Okinawa-honto and Kume-jima islands in the Ryukyus (Tanikawa and Sasaki 1999; Shinkai et al. 2022). These species inhabit moist and shaded places, including caves, mines, screes, forest leaf litter, and, in the case of H. mogera, meadows, paddy fields, vegetated seashores, and hedgerows in city parks. Although Nesticella and Howaia species can be relatively easy to find in their suitable habitats, the latest extensive research on these genera dates back to the 1970s with studies by Yaginuma (1970, 1972, 1979). No taxonomic research dealing with Japanese fauna has been conducted in the last 40 years, and no molecular phylogenetic hypothesis involving the Japanese species is currently available.

In the course of our surveys on spiders dwelling in forest litter and caves in Japan, we had the opportunity to collect several Nesticella and Howaia specimens from different localities and islands. Among them, we recognized morphologically unique forms likely representing undescribed species. Here, we revise the Japanese Nesticella and Howaia based on the type specimens of the species described in Japan and the newly collected material. The goals of our work are as follows: (i) confirm the boundaries of Nesticella and Howaia species living in Japan and assign them to the known species groups; in doing so we use an integrative taxonomic approach consisting of conventional morphological examination and COI-based DNA barcoding, (ii) redescribe and illustrate the Japanese named species, using a more modern approach, and (iii) describe and name the species recognized as new by the integrative taxonomic analyses. In addition, we provide supplementary information about the ecology, habitat, and other biological characteristics of the species herein discussed. Such information is often lacking in taxonomic revisions but may represent an important additional source of data for studies on the systematic and evolutionary history of arthropod taxa.

Materials and methods

Taxonomy

Fresh specimens were collected by sieving the forest leaf litter with an entomological litter reducer or, in caves, by hand with visual searching. When possible, environmental variables (e.g., temperature and humidity) were recorded inside the caves using an As One TH-220 Portable thermo-hygrometer. Additional specimens were borrowed from the collections of the National Museum of Nature and Science of Japan and the Osaka Museum of Natural History, or were kindly provided by local researchers. Newly collected specimens were preserved in 99% ethanol and stored in freezers at -20 °C in the laboratory of Systematic Zoology, Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan (TMU) for molecular and morphological analyses. Individuals were examined using a Nikon SMZ1270 and an AZ100 stereo microscopes at the same institute. Epigynes were dissected using a sharp needle and cleared by boiling them for a few minutes in a 20% KOH solution until the inner structures were visible. Epigynes and vulvae were subsequently observed using a Nikon Optiphot 2 microscope. Photographs were taken using a Canon EOS kiss X10 digital camera mounted on AZ100 or Optiphot 2 microscopes. Final images were assembled using Helicon Focus v. 7 image stacking software (https://www.heliconsoft.com) and edited with Adobe Photoshop CC v. 20.0.6 (https://www.photoshop.com/). Lengths of leg segments were measured on the lateral side and are given as follows: total length (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). All measurements in the text are given in millimeters. The size scatterplot was visualized using Microsoft Excel.

All vouchers used in this study are preserved in the following collections: the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba (NMST), the Museum of Nature and Human Activities, Hyogo (MNHAH), the Ryukyu University Museum Fujukan, Okinawa (RMUF), the Osaka Museum of Natural History, Osaka (OMNH), and in the personal collections of Francesco Ballarin (FBPC), Yuya Suzuki (YSPC), Toshimichi Nagai (TNPC), and Yuri M. Marusik (YMPC). The nomenclature of morphological characters used in this work follows those of Suzuki and Ballarin (2020) and Fomichev et al. (2022). The abbreviations used in the text and figures are as follows:

ALE anterior lateral eyes;

AME anterior median eyes;

BV maximum likelihood bootstrap value;

Ca apophysis retrolateral process of conductor;

Cd copulatory duct;

Cl lobe of conductor;

Cm median process of conductor;

Co copulatory opening;

Cp prolateral process of conductor;

Cr retrolateral process of conductor;

Di (I–II) distal process(es) of paracymbium;

Do dorsal process of paracymbium;

E embolus;

Id insemination duct;

P paracymbium;

PLE posterior lateral eyes;

PME posterior median eyes;

PP Bayesian Inference posterior probability;

Ra radical apophysis;

Rx radix;

S spermatheca;

Sc scapus;

Sd sperm duct;

St subtegulum;

Te tegulum;

Ve (I–II) ventral process(es) of paracymbium.

Molecular analysis

Phylogenetic analyses, species delimitation analyses, and a pairwise distance genetic divergence analysis were conducted to confirm the boundaries and intraspecific genetic diversity of the species tentatively discriminated by examining external and genital morphology (hereafter referred to as “morphospecies”). For each species, fresh representative specimens from the type locality or nearby localities (hereafter collectively referred to as “topotypes”) were also included in the analyses whenever possible. The species Howaia subterranea sp. nov. was excluded from the analyses because of the lack of fresh samples. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the leg tissue using a Chelex-TE-ProK method. Four legs were removed from each specimen and included in an extraction buffer of 100 µL containing a solution of 10% Chelex-TE and 4 µL Qiagen Proteinase K. The extraction buffer was incubated at 56 °C for 24 h followed by 10 min at 99 °C to inactivate the Proteinase K. A fragment of the mitochondrial gene Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI, 1200 bp) was selectively amplified using the following primer couples: LCO1490 (F) GGTCAACAAATCATCATAAAGATATTGG (Folmer et al. 1994) and CHR2 (R) GGATGGCCAAAAAATCAAAATAAATG (Barrett and Hebert 2005), C1-J-2183 (F) CAACATTTATTTTGATTTTTTGG (Simon et al. 1994), and C1-N-2776 (R) GGATAATCAGAATATCGTCGAGG (Hedin and Maddison 2001).

A SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, U.S.) with a final volume of 11 µl was used for the PCR amplification under the following protocol: 94° (2’); [98° (10’’), 45° (30’’), 68° (10’’)] ×5; [94° (10’’), 50° (30’’), 68° (45’’)] ×40; 68° (7’). Cycle sequencing reactions were performed using a “SupreDye Cycle Sequencing Kit.” All experiments were carried out in the Systematic Zoology and Systematic Botany Laboratories of TMU, Japan. Additional sequences were obtained from previous phylogenetic studies on Asian Nesticella species (Zhang and Li 2013; Ballarin and Li 2018). The complete list of the specimens used is reported in Table 1. Sequences were visually checked and aligned using the online version of MAFFT software v. 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) under the G-INS-I method.

Table 1.

list of specimens used in this study and related GenBank accession numbers and locality of collection. New sequences are indicated by an asterisk.

code Species GenBank Locality Origin
001 Howaia yanbeiensis MG200877 China, Guangxi Prov., Yanbei cave Ballarin and Li 2018
004 Nesticella apiculata MG200892 China, Beijing Municipality, cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
007 Nesticella beccus MG200985 Laos, Khammouanc Prov., Tham Kamouk cave Ballarin and Li 2018
009 Nesticella beccus MG200986 Laos, Bolikhamxay Prov., Hospital cave Ballarin and Li 2018
020 Nesticella kaohsiungensis MG200979 Taiwan, Nantou County, Huisunlinchang forest Ballarin and Li 2018
023 Nesticella apiculata MG200894 China, Jiangxi Prov., Longgong cave Ballarin and Li 2018
034 Nesticella songi MG200912 China, Guangxi Prov., Feng cave Ballarin and Li 2018
070 Nesticella beccus MG200987 China, Yunnan Prov., Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve Ballarin and Li 2018
077 Nesticella beccus MG200988 China, Yunnan Prov., Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve Ballarin and Li 2018
083 Nesticella apiculata MG200895 China, Jiangxi Prov., Yuhu cave Ballarin and Li 2018
091 Nesticella odonta MG200934 China, Jiangxi Prov., Xiongxin cave Ballarin and Li 2018
092 Nesticella odonta MG200937 China, Jiangxi Prov., cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
095 Nesticella verticalis MG200922 China, Guizhou Prov., Dongfushanzhuang cave Ballarin and Li 2018
113 Nesticella shanlinensis MG200962 China, Guizhou Prov., Menglong cave Ballarin and Li 2018
121 Nesticella connectens MG201016 Thailand, Satun Prov., Beating cave Ballarin and Li 2018
135 Nesticella shanlinensis MG200963 China, Chongqing Municipality, Erlong cave Ballarin and Li 2018
197 Nesticella aelleni MG201003 Sri Lanka, Sabaragamuwa Prov., Isthripura cave Ballarin and Li 2018
198 Nesticella aelleni MG201004 Sri Lanka, Central Prov., Peraderiya Town, Botanic Gardens Ballarin and Li 2018
199 Nesticella aelleni MG201007 Sri Lanka, Southern Prov., Yabbalamulla Ballarin and Li 2018
200 Nesticella aelleni MG201006 Sri Lanka, Western Prov., Avissawella Ballarin and Li 2018
208 Nesticella kaohsiungensis MG200981 Taiwan, Kaohsiung City, cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
209 Nesticella kaohsiungensis MG200980 Taiwan, Nantou County, Huisun forest area Ballarin and Li 2018
282 Nesticella songi MG200913 China, Guizhou Prov., cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
291 Nesticella shanlinensis MG200964 China, Guizhou Prov., Woshuida cave Ballarin and Li 2018
400 Nesticella aelleni MG201005 Sri Lanka, Central Prov., Koththol cave Ballarin and Li 2018
412 Nesticella apiculata MG200893 China, Henan Prov., Yin cave Ballarin and Li 2018
414 Howaia huomachongensis MG200881 China, Hubei Prov., cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
417 Howaia huomachongensis MG200884 China, Hubei Prov., Xiejiaba Village, cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
419 Howaia huomachongensis MG200883 China, Hubei Prov., Guanyin cave Ballarin and Li 2018
420 Nesticella connectens MG201020 Thailand, Phang Nga Prov., Tharn Lod cave Ballarin and Li 2018
421 Nesticella connectens MG201021 Thailand, Krabi Prov., Blue Diamond cave Ballarin and Li 2018
422 Nesticella connectens MG201015 Thailand, Nakhon Nayon Prov., Changwat Sakhon Nayok forest Ballarin and Li 2018
439 Howaia huomachongensis MG200882 China, Hubei Prov., Xianwu cave Ballarin and Li 2018
453 Nesticella shanlinensis MG200966 China, Chongqing Municipality, Jin’e cave Ballarin and Li 2018
454 Howaia mogera MG200905 China, Sichuan Prov., Baxian cave Ballarin and Li 2018
479 Nesticella beccus MG200989 China, Yunnan Prov., Laohu cave Ballarin and Li 2018
489 Nesticella beccus MG200990 China, Yunnan Prov., Niumo cave Ballarin and Li 2018
507 Nesticella odonta MG200936 China, Yunnan Prov., Manglehe cave Ballarin and Li 2018
528 Nesticella odonta MG200939 China, Sichuan Prov., Shihai Township Ballarin and Li 2018
563 Nesticella verticalis MG200925 China, Guizhou Prov., Guyang cave Ballarin and Li 2018
572 Nesticella connectens MG201017 Thailand, Yala Prov., outside the Khao Thai cave Ballarin and Li 2018
573 Nesticella connectens MG201018 Thailand, Yala Prov., outside the Krasaeng cave Ballarin and Li 2018
574 Nesticella connectens MG201019 Thailand, Rattalung Prov., Lor Kor cave Ballarin and Li 2018
1414 Howaia mogera MG200897 China, Hubei Prov., cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
BL3 Nesticella shanlinensis MG200967 China, Guizhou Prov., Guihua Village, cave without name Ballarin and Li 2018
BS Nesticella songi MG200914 China, Guizhou Prov., Shuibashui cave Ballarin and Li 2018
GX7 Howaia mogera MG200898 China, Guizhou Prov., Tiexice cave Ballarin and Li 2018
HE Nesticella verticalis MG200923 China, Guizhou Prov., Hei cave Ballarin and Li 2018
HM Nesticella verticalis MG200927 China, Hunan Prov., Hama cave Ballarin and Li 2018
HU Howaia huomachongensis MG200885 China, Hunan Prov., Huanglong cave Ballarin and Li 2018
LI Nesticella odonta MG200938 China, Guizhou Prov., Liuguan cave Ballarin and Li 2018
ND Nesticella verticalis MG200926 China, Guizhou Prov., Niu cave Ballarin and Li 2018
Ne01 Nesticella brevipes OR123601* Japan, Kyushu, Ōita Pref., Odzu Tome dōkutsu iseki cave This work
Ne02 Nesticella brevipes OR123602* Japan, Kyushu, Ōita Pref., Odzu Tome dōkutsu iseki cave This work
Ne10 Nesticella terrestris OR123603* Japan, Tokyo, Hachioji This work
Ne11 Howaia mogera OR123604* Japan, Shizuoka Pref., Okuyama This work
Ne12 Howaia mogera OR123605* Japan, Fukui Pref., Nagatani This work
Ne13 Howaia mogera OR123606* Japan, Mie Pref., Otani This work
Ne16 Howaia mogera OR123607* Japan, Yamagata Pref., Oyama This work
Ne17 Howaia mogera OR123608* Japan, Nagano Pref., Ijima This work
Ne18 Nesticella terrestris OR123609* Japan, Saitama Pref., Furutera cave This work
Ne26 Howaia mogera OR123610* Japan, Nagano Pref., Ijima This work
Ne27 Howaia mogera OR123611* Japan, Nagano Pref., Ijima This work
Ne39 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123612* Japan, Amami Is., Naze This work
Ne40 Howaia alba OR123613* Japan, Miyakojima Is., Tsuzupisuki-abi cave This work
Ne41 Nesticella occulta OR123614* Japan, Ishigaki Is., Kabirano-ana cave This work
Ne42 Howaia mogera OR123615* Japan, Ishigaki Is., Fukubukuīzā cave This work
Ne43 Howaia mogera OR123616* Japan, Ishigaki Is., Fukubukuīzā cave This work
Ne44 Nesticella occulta OR123617* Japan, Ishigaki Is., Kabirano-ana cave This work
Ne45 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123618* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is., Izumi This work
Ne46 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123619* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is., Izumi This work
Ne47 Howaia alba OR123620* Japan, Miyakojima Is., Pinza-abu cave This work
Ne47b Howaia alba OR123621* Japan, Miyakojima Is., Pinza-abu cave This work
Ne48 Howaia alba OR123622* Japan, Miyakojima Is., Tsuzupisuki-abu cave This work
Ne49 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123623* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is., Yona, Yambaru Park This work
Ne50 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123624* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is., Yona, Yambaru Park This work
Ne51 Howaia mogera OR123625* Japan, Yonaguni Is., Irizaki This work
Ne52 Nesticella insulana OR123626* Japan, Yonaguni Is., Mitsudahara Forest Park This work
Ne53 Nesticella insulana OR123627* Japan, Yonaguni Is., Mitsudahara Forest Park This work
Ne54 Nesticella brevipes OR123628* Japan, Shikoku Is., Konji This work
Ne55 Howaia mogera OR123629* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is., Naha, Sueyoshi park This work
Ne56 Howaia mogera OR123630* Japan, Hachijo-jima Is., Hachijo Botanical Park This work
Ne59 Nesticella terrestris OR123631* Japan, Aichi Pref., Suse-cho This work
Ne60 Nesticella terrestris OR123632* Japan, Tokyo Pref., Hachioji, Hachioji castle ruins This work
Ne61 Nesticella terrestris OR123633* Japan, Tokyo Pref., Hachioji, Hachioji castle ruins This work
Ne62 Howaia mogera OR123634* Japan, Amami-Oshima Is., Kasarichō Ōaza Kise This work
Ne65 Nesticella silvicola OR123635* Japan, Yakushima Is., Koseda This work
Ne66 Nesticella silvicola OR123636* Japan, Yakushima Is., Anbo This work
Ne67 Nesticella silvicola OR123637* Japan, Yakushima Is., Isso This work
Ne68 Nesticella silvicola OR123638* Japan, Yakushima Is., Miyanoura This work
Ne69 Howaia mogera OR123639* Japan, Yakushima Is., Anbo This work
Ne70 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123640* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is.,Yona, Yambaru Park This work
Ne71 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123641* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is.,Yona, Yambaru Park This work
Ne72 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123642* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is.,Yona, Yambaru Park This work
Ne77 Howaia alba OR123643* Japan, Miyako-jima Is., Nakabari Limestone cave This work
Ne78 Howaia alba OR123644* Japan, Miyako-jima Is., Tsuzupisuki-abu cave This work
Ne79 Howaia mogera OR123645* Japan, Okinawa-honto Is. Shimuku Gama cave This work
Ne81 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123646* Japan, Kumejima Is., Maja This work
Ne82 Nesticella okinawaensis OR123647* Japan, Kumejima Is., Uegusuku This work
Neque Nesticella quelpartensis JN817085 South Korea, Jeju Island, cave GenBank
QX1 Howaia yanbeiensis MG200880 China, Guangxi Prov., Qixing cave Ballarin and Li 2018
QX2 Howaia yanbeiensis MG200878 China, Guangxi Prov., Dushu cave Ballarin and Li 2018
QX4 Howaia yanbeiensis KF359049 China, Guangxi Prov., Ruyan cave Zhang and Li 2013
SH2 Nesticella beccus KF359041 China, Yunnan Prov., Xianfo cave Zhang and Li 2013
SH6 Nesticella beccus KF359038 China, Yunnan Prov., Riyue cave Zhang and Li 2013
SH7 Nesticella beccus KF359039 China, Yunnan Prov., Shihua cave Zhang and Li 2013
SI Nesticella songi MG200915 China, Guizhou Prov., Shuilong Cave Ballarin and Li 2018
WA Nesticella shanlinensis MG200965 China, Guizhou Prov., Mawan cave Ballarin and Li 2018
YF3 Nesticella songi MG200916 China, Guangxi Prov., Dayan cave Ballarin and Li 2018
YG Nesticella verticalis MG200924 China, Guizhou Prov., Yangzi cave Ballarin and Li 2018
YN Howaia huomachongensis MG200886 China, Hunan Prov., Yanzi cave Ballarin and Li 2018
YS Nesticella odonta MG200935 China, Hunan Prov., Changsha City Ballarin and Li 2018
Z062 Wraios longiembolus MG201040 China, Yunnan Prov., Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve Ballarin and Li 2018

We conducted a phylogenetic analysis using a final dataset of 113 terminals assigned to 20 morphospecies. The nesticid Wraios longiembolus Ballarin & Li, 2015 was used as an outgroup to root the trees because of its close relationship with Nesticella and Howaia (Ballarin and Li 2018). We inferred two distinct phylogenies using a maximum likelihood (ML) analysis in RAxML-NG (Kozlov et al. 2019) and a Bayesian inference (BI) analysis in MrBayes v. 3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012). Both analyses were run remotely on CIPRES Science Gateway v. 3.3 (https://www.phylo.org/). We used an unpartitioned dataset since preliminary tests suggested no significative differences in the tree topologies and nodes support using a single partition or a partition by codon. ML was performed using a rapid bootstrap of 1,000 replicates under a GTRGAMMAI model and the standard parameters suggested by the software. BI was performed twice with the run of four Monte Carlo Markov chains (MCMCs) for one million generations with a 25% burning fraction and sampling trees every 1,000 generations. We monitored the results using TRACER v. 1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018) confirming that the analysis has reached an effective sample size (ESS) of more than 200 in order to ensure chains convergence. A TIM3+I+G substitution model was used in the analysis as suggested by Jmodeltest2 (Darriba et al. 2012) testing the dataset under the corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc). The resulting trees were displayed using Figtree software v. 1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). Nodes with BV ≥ 70 or PP ≥ 0.95 were considered as highly supported.

The species delimitation analyses were performed comparing three different methods: ASAP, mPTP, and bPTP. These are among the most frequently used methods for single-locus species delimitation in modern studies. The Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) analysis (Puillandre et al. 2021) was performed online (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/) under Jukes-Cantor (JC69) and Kimura (K80) models. A trimmed dataset of 650 bp (= the Folmer region) was used to minimize the effects of missing sites at the terminals that remained involved in the original dataset. Split group probability was set to 2% and other options were set as default. Following the ASAP manual, we considered only the output with the lowest score (SC = 4.5).

Both the mPTP and bPTP methods represent improved versions of the older Poisson Tree Processes method (PTP). They use respectively a multi-rate Poisson method (mPTP) (Kapli et al. 2017) and Bayesian support values (bPTP) (Zhang et al. 2013) assuming independent exponential distributions to model the branch lengths of each species. The Newick input tree was reconstructed using MrBayes based on the same trimmed dataset previously used for the ASAP analysis and under the same conditions described for the phylogenetic analysis. We performed the mPTP analysis online (https://mptp.h-its.org/#/tree) using the default parameters and cropping the outgroup. The bPTP analysis was also run remotely (https://species.h-its.org/ptp/). The number of MCMC generations was set to 200,000 with the thinning and the burn-in values set respectively to 100 and 0.1. Other parameters were set to default.

Finally, we performed an uncorrected pairwise-distance genetic divergence analysis in MEGA X v. 10.0.5 (Kumar et al. 2018). We used the same dataset for the species delimitation analysis to calculate intraspecific divergences. We prepared a further reduced dataset obtained by pruning the samples to have a single sequence of the COI barcode for each species to calculate interspecific divergences. The sequences of the “topotypes” were preferentially kept when possible. A bootstrap method with 1,000 replications was conducted with the other options set as default.

Results and discussion

Remarks on the phylogeny of Nesticella and Howaia

The phylogenetic trees generated using both RAxML and MrBayes show the exact same topology and a similar high support for the majority of the nodes. The resulting combined tree is reported in Fig. 14. The morphospecies included in this study cluster together into five major lineages, three of which correspond to the species groups sensu Lin et al. (2016) and one to Howaia (= N. mogera group). These clades are highly supported by at least one of the two phylogenetic inferences. Our results support the monophyly of Howaia with the species belonging to the N. mogera group all sharing the same recent common ancestor. In accordance with previous studies, Nesticella is resolved as paraphyletic being divided into several distinct lineages and with Howaia nested inside. Such results further highlight that Nesticella is in need of a proper systematic revision. Among the Nesticella clades, N. okinawaensis is recovered as a well-supported independent lineage (BV = 78, PP = 1), distinct from the N. brevipes group. This suggests a modification to the temporary placement of N. okinawaensis in the N. brevipes group by Lin et al. (2016). The genetic distance between different Nesticella species groups and Howaia ranges from 14% to 19% with a mean of 16%.

Recognition of putative species using an integrative approach

Based on the morphological examination of genitalia (male palp and female epigyne), we separated the studied specimens into nine morphospecies. Four are recognized as already described species (N. brevipes, N. terrestris, N. okinawaensis, and H. mogera) (Figs 1A–G, 4A–D, 5A–G, 6A–G, 7A–H, 12A–G, and 13A–D). Nesticella terrestris, currently in synonymy with N. brevipes, shows apparent differences with the latter species in body size and shape of genitalia (Figs 5A–G, 7A–D cf. Figs 6A–G, 7E–H; see also Fig. 17A, B), suggesting its resurrection. Five additional morphospecies show unique combinations of characters that do not fit with any of the previously described taxa and are consequently described as new species (N. insulana sp. nov., N. silvicola sp. nov., N. occulta sp. nov., H. alba sp. nov., and H. subterranea sp. nov.) (Figs 2A–J, 3A–E, 4E–H, 8A–J, 9A–J, 10A–H, 11A–E, 13E, F).

All the species morphologically discriminated in the present study, including the undetermined morphospecies, are recovered as independent lineages with long branches. Most also have high basal node support by at least one of the two phylogenetic inferences. Such concordance provides a solid basis for considering all those morphospecies as valid in an integrative taxonomy. Among them, N. terrestris is also resolved as a clade clearly distinct from N. brevipes, thus corroborating the separation between these two species already highlighted by morphology. On the other hand, some cases require additional consideration. Howaia mogera is resolved as divided into two distinct, highly supported subclades (BV = 100, PP = 1), with relatively deep genetic divergence (2.5–3.7%, mean = 3.1%), in line with the results of previous phylogenies based on Chinese specimens (Zhang and Li 2013; Ballarin and Li 2018).

Similarly, species with a wide geographic distribution covering different islands show deep genetic divergences among geographically segregated populations (e.g., N. brevipes from Shikoku and Kyushu Is. = 7%, N. okinawaensis from Okinawa-honto, Kume-jima and Amami Ōshima Is. = 6–10%). Such populations appear to be separated from each other by long basal branches. Additionally, the phylogenetic relationships of some Japanese species (e.g., N. silvicola sp. nov., N. brevipes, and N. terrestris) remain unclear because of the low node support in the deeper parts of their branches. Nevertheless, all these three species form a highly supported clade (BV = 83, PP = 1) suggesting a common origin.

Results of the species delimitation analyses are also reported in Fig. 14 where the morphological observations are compared with the output of the ASAP, mPTP, and bPTP analyses. The mPTP analysis is highly consistent with the morphological taxonomy supporting 21 species vs 20. A slightly higher number of putative species is estimated by ASAP (23 species vs 20), while bPTP vastly exceed this number (32 vs 20) splitting into putative distinct species several morphospecies. Both N. brevipes and N. okinawaensis show a high intramorphospecific genetic divergence among geographically segregated populations, being split into more than one putative species by the ASAP and bPTP methods (but not by mPTP). In line with the morphological analysis ASAP considers the two subclades of H. mogera as belonging to the same species while both mPTP and bPTP split them into two putative species.

The results of the intermorphospecific pairwise-distances based on the species barcode are shown in Table 2. The interspecific genetic distance between the Nesticella and Howaia morphospecies used in this study ranges from 5.8% to 19% (mean = 14.7%), from 6.9% to 17.5% (mean = 14.7%) for the Japanese morphospecies and from 10.3% to 16.1% (mean = 14.3%) for the Japanese morphospecies excluding the three morphospecies with significant genetic structures (H. mogera, N. brevipes, and N. okinawaensis). Intramorphospecific diversity among the Japanese species is as follows: N. brevipes = 0–7.6%; N. insulana sp. nov. = 0%; H. mogera = 0–3.7%; N. occulta sp. nov. = 0.3%; N. okinawaensis = 0–7.8%; N. silvicola sp. nov. = 0.3–1.1%; H. alba sp. nov. = 0–2.5%; N. terrestris = 0–1.9%. We found considerable intraspecific genetic divergences in H. mogera (max. divergence = 3.7%), N. brevipes (7.6%), and N. okinawaensis (7.8%). This is possibly related to the strong geographic isolation of their populations inhabiting different islands. On the other hand, the genetic divergence among the allopatric populations of these species is considerably smaller than the mean of the divergence calculated among the entire species considered in this work (14.7%). It is also lesser than the minimum divergence (10.3%) among the Japanese morphospecies when these three species are excluded.

Table 2.

Uncorrected Pairwise-distance between the Japanese and other Asian species of the genera Nesticella and Howaia based on the barcode COI partial sequence.

H. mogera H. alba sp. nov. N. insulana sp. nov. N. brevipes N. silvicola sp. nov. N. terrestris N. okinawaensis N. occulta sp. nov. N. kaohsiungensis N. quelpartensis H. yanbeiensis H. huomachongensis N. wanzaiensis H. apiculata N. odonta N. songi N. verticalis N. hongheensis N. shanlinensis N. beccus N. aelleni N. connectens N. yui
H. mogera (Ne016)
H. alba sp. nov. (Ne040) 0.069
N. insulana sp. nov. (Ne052) 0.149 0.160
N. brevipes (Ne054) 0.157 0.155 0.141
N. silvicola sp. nov. (Ne65) 0.153 0.149 0.136 0.129
N. terrestris (Ne061) 0.132 0.149 0.127 0.125 0.111
N. okinawaensis (Ne046) 0.163 0.174 0.168 0.157 0.156 0.168
N. occulta sp. nov. (Ne041) 0.132 0.144 0.161 0.169 0.161 0.151 0.175
N. kaohsiungensis (020) 0.140 0.143 0.155 0.169 0.153 0.141 0.180 0.103
N. quelpartensis (Neque) 0.149 0.144 0.160 0.166 0.159 0.151 0.190 0.103 0.058
H. yanbeiensis (QX4) 0.101 0.108 0.146 0.160 0.141 0.144 0.166 0.149 0.160 0.157
H. huomachongensis (417) 0.089 0.097 0.147 0.158 0.144 0.144 0.171 0.138 0.151 0.147 0.065
N. wanzaiensis (027) 0.094 0.083 0.151 0.158 0.144 0.137 0.175 0.157 0.163 0.160 0.083 0.072
H. apiculata (412) 0.083 0.086 0.129 0.144 0.139 0.138 0.160 0.146 0.151 0.151 0.074 0.077 0.071
N. odonta (507) 0.141 0.151 0.094 0.144 0.132 0.108 0.160 0.149 0.155 0.151 0.146 0.147 0.141 0.140
N. songi (282) 0.134 0.152 0.108 0.131 0.127 0.106 0.149 0.149 0.147 0.158 0.141 0.151 0.138 0.137 0.103
N. verticalis (563) 0.155 0.158 0.131 0.146 0.141 0.118 0.166 0.178 0.149 0.152 0.164 0.172 0.163 0.155 0.126 0.078
N. hongheensis (495) 0.160 0.171 0.127 0.152 0.110 0.123 0.184 0.161 0.158 0.149 0.158 0.166 0.160 0.147 0.118 0.124 0.141
N. shanlinensis (135) 0.155 0.161 0.141 0.143 0.124 0.126 0.166 0.160 0.157 0.158 0.151 0.164 0.158 0.144 0.140 0.137 0.137 0.131
N. beccus (SH7) 0.154 0.155 0.158 0.178 0.169 0.147 0.166 0.146 0.140 0.155 0.169 0.158 0.154 0.160 0.157 0.161 0.158 0.172 0.158
N. aelleni (400) 0.154 0.158 0.158 0.163 0.152 0.163 0.149 0.161 0.161 0.174 0.157 0.157 0.149 0.147 0.151 0.158 0.175 0.160 0.158 0.111
N. connectens (573) 0.164 0.164 0.164 0.164 0.159 0.160 0.184 0.154 0.144 0.157 0.169 0.171 0.163 0.169 0.164 0.151 0.164 0.169 0.155 0.151 0.149
N. yui (492) 0.152 0.163 0.157 0.175 0.153 0.143 0.169 0.167 0.143 0.144 0.163 0.151 0.151 0.158 0.152 0.141 0.138 0.158 0.169 0.164 0.155 0.181
W. longiembolus (062) 0.164 0.169 0.149 0.183 0.147 0.157 0.169 0.152 0.160 0.152 0.154 0.158 0.157 0.149 0.141 0.155 0.169 0.158 0.169 0.181 0.172 0.177 0.161

As a result of the present study, we propose nine Nesticella and Howaia species for the fauna of Japan based on the combined results of morphology and molecular analyses, including five species new to science. The taxonomic revision of the Japanese species is reported in the “Taxonomic account” section. The use of a single mitochondrial gene marker for species delimitation may overestimate the number of putative cryptic species (e.g., see Hupało et al. 2022). This is probably the case with the bPTP analysis where several clades are resolved as split into putative species, often in contrast with previous taxonomic studies and with the results of the other methods used. Based on such considerations we prefer to follow a “conservative” partitioning hypothesis. Thus, in presence of inconstancy between morphological and molecular results, we used a morphology-based delimitation for the Japanese species until further studies involving multiple genetic markers and a wide number of specimens are available. However, the possible existence of further cryptic species among H. mogera, N. brevipes, and N. okinawaensis is not completely excluded from this conclusion. Similarly, in the case of H. subterranea sp. nov., we defined the species as new based on morphological comparison only due to the lack of available specimens for molecular analysis. A molecular-based confirmation of this species is thus postponed until additional fresh samples are accessible.

Considerations on the genera Nesticella and Howaia in the Japanese and Ryukyuan archipelagos

Although Japan is considered one of the leading Asian biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al. 2000), the species richness and phylogeographic patterns of numerous epigean and subterranean arthropod taxa, including spiders (Araneae), have not yet been adequately explored. Nevertheless, new records of long-neglected taxa and the integrative use of molecular data and conventional morphology have rapidly filled this gap in recent years. The present research aims to follow this positive trend using a “modern” approach to revise in detail the state of knowledge of the genera Nesticella and Howaia in the Japanese and Ryukyuan archipelagos. Accordingly, we updated the taxonomy and distribution of the already-known species, we resurrected a previously synonymized species, and we described five additional species as new to science.

In doing so, we estimated the boundaries of the species using both morphological and molecular analyses. Our study reveals that the number of Nesticella and Howaia species in Japan is much greater than previously expected, increasing from three to nine. All the newly described species are endemic to the Ryukyus and are found on different islands. Among the new species we also report the first cases of true troglobitic Nesticella and Howaia species for the fauna of Japan. Such results further emphasize the high level of endemism of the spider fauna in the Ryukyus and are in line with other studies on Ryukyuan spiders (e.g., Xu et al. 2019). Our study also confirms that Japanese and Ryukyuan archipelagos are biodiversity hotspots for Nesticidae and subterranean spiders. Similar patterns can likely be found in other genera or families of troglophilic spiders as suggested by similar studies (e.g., Ballarin and Eguchi 2022; Suzuki et al. 2022). Special attention and collecting efforts should thus be focused on this archipelago to better explore its diversity. In this regard, the real magnitude of species diversity of the short-legged nesticid spiders in Japan is likely still not yet completely unveiled. For example, the relatively large genetic distance among conspecific individuals of H. mogera, N. brevipes, and N. okinawaensis suggests the possibility of genetically distinct local populations or cryptic species whose boundaries should be adequately tested in the future. Additionally, undescribed species of Nesticella and/or Howaia may still be hidden in caves or in the forest litter of poorly surveyed islands among the numerous islands forming the Japanese and Ryukyuan Archipelagos.

Conclusions

With this research we aimed to further study the family Nesticidae in Asia toward the final goal of its comprehensive revision. We also believe that our outcomes open the door to future additional studies on Japanese and Asian nesticids concerning their diversity, historical biogeography, phylogeny, ecology, and the time and mode of island colonization and cave-adaptation. In Asia, nesticids are often endemic, locally hyperdiverse, and relatively easy to collect, and an increasing amount of data on their distribution, morphology and genetic diversity is becoming available. Thus, these spiders can be considered as a suitable model organism for revealing biogeographical and evolutionary patterns of troglophilic terrestrial arthropods (e.g., Zhang and Li 2013; Ballarin and Li 2018) and adequately detecting local hotspots of genetic diversity, a concept of increasing importance in conservation biology. In the future, additional sampling and the use of integrative studies applied to other poorly-studied nesticid genera and other “so-far-neglected” troglophilic spider taxa may help to further reveal new and interesting information on these arthropods.

Taxonomic account

Class: Arachnida Cuvier, 1812

Order: Araneae Clerck, 1757

Family: Nesticidae Simon, 1894

Tribe: Nesticellini Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980

Howaia Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980

= N. mogera group sensu Lin et al. 2016.

Type species

Nesticus mogera Yaginuma, 1972 from Japan.

Howaia mogera (Yaginuma, 1972)

Figs 1A–J, 4A–D, 15A, 16C, D (Japanese name: chibi-horahimegumoチビホラヒメグモ)

Nesticus terrestris Yaginuma 1970: 390, fig. 7 (♂, misidentification).

N. mogera Yaginuma 1972: 621, fig. 1 (♂♀); Yaginuma 1979: 275, pl. 6, figs 11, 12 (♂♀).

Howaia mogera Lehtinen and Saaristo 1980: 53, figs 7–9, 22–23, 29b (♂♀ transferred from Nesticus).

Nesticus brevipes Paik 1996: 72, figs 1–10 (♀, misidentification).1

Type locality

Japan, Tokyo Pref., Tamagawa.

Material examined

Japan: Honshu Is.: Miyagi Pref.: 1♀, Tome-gun, Lake Izunuma, 20.July.1986, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); 6♂, 4♀, Tamatukuri-gun, Naruko-cho, Myousada, 7–10.May.1996, K. Kumada leg. (NMST-Ar.3587); Akita Pref.: 1♀, Akita-shi, Shimokitateyanagitate, Kagawa, 21.Nov.2005, A. Fukushima leg. (NSMT-Ar.20405, identified as N. brevipes); Yamagata Pref.: 1♀, Tsuruoka-shi, Oyama, 38.75628°N, 139.76331°E, 26.Aug.2019, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Tochigi Pref.: 1♂ Tochigi-shi, Fujoka-machi, Uchino, Watarase-Yusuichi, 36.2353°N, 139.6574°E, Alt.: 20 m, 2.Apr.2022, N. Kikuchi leg. (FBPC); Tokyo Pref.: 1♂ (holotype), Tamagawa, 3.Feb.1969, H. Kobayashi leg. (NMST-Ar.73); 1♂, 2♀, Hachioji-shi, Minami-Osawa, Tokyo Metropolitan University campus, litter under bushes, 35.6245°N, 139.3863°E, 22.Sep.2020, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Hachijo-jima Is.: 3♂, 3♀, Okago, Hachijo Botanical Park, forest litter, 33.11044°N, 139.78432°E, 03.May.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Kanagawa Pref.: 1♂, 2♀, Kawasaki-shi, Nakahara-ku, Kasugi-cho, Dec.1984 (exact date unknown), H. Ono leg. (NMST-Ar.893); 2♀, Yokohama-shi, Maioka park, 6.July.1986, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); Nagano Pref.: 2♀, Ueda-shi, 8.Sep.1998, Y. Fujisawa leg. (NMST-Ar.6965); 3♀, Kamiina-gun, Ijima-cho, 35.67049°N, 137.91159°E, 09.Sep.2019, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Shizuoka Pref.: 1♀ (Paratype), Tenryu-shi, Mar.1970 (exact date unknown), H. Kobayashi leg. (NMST-Ar.74); 1♀, Hamamatsu-shi, Kita Ward, Inasacho Okuyama, 34.85102°N, 137.62569°E, under grass tuffs in a paddy field, 30.Sep.2019, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Fukui Pref: 1♀, Tsuruga-shi, Nagatani, under grass tuffs in a paddy field, 35.60836°N, 136.03872°E, 3.Oct.2019, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Mie Pref: 1♀, Iga-shi, Otani, under grass tuffs in a paddy field, 34.79919°N, 136.13501°E, 7.Oct.2019, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Kumamoto Pref.: 2♂, 1♀, Tamana-gun, Gyokutou-machi, Harakura, Yamakitasho-no-ana cave (山北小の穴), 20.May.1984, T. Irie leg. (NMST-Ar.16065); Kagoshima Pref.: 1♀, Minami Kyushu-shi, Kawabe-cho, 26.Feb.2007, K. Iohii(?) leg. (NMST-Ar.14585); Yakushima Is.: 1♂, Anbo, 207 m, broadleaf forest litter on a gentle slope 30.28458°N, 130.61799°E, 24.Sep.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Suwanosejima Is.: 1♂, 2♀, Otohime-no-dokutsu cave, 8.Jul.2022, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Amami-Ōshima Is.: 1♂, Amami-shi, Kasarichō Ōaza Kise, 2 m, at the base of tufts of grass on a sandy seashore, 28.46221°N, 129.65013°E, 13.Jul.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Okinawa Pref.: Okinawa-Honto Is.: 1♀, Naha-shi, Sueyoshi park, 70 m, humid broadleaves litter under trees, 26.22840°N, 127.71508°E, 21.Nov.2020, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 1♂, 4♀, Nakagami-gun, Yomitan-son, Namihira, Shimuku Gama cave (シムクガマ), Alt.:72 m, large and long cave with a creek, 26.40242°N, 127.73125°E, 15.May.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Aka-jima Is.: 3♀, 17.Mar.2022, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Kume-jima Is.: 1♂, Shimajiri-gun, Gima, Nameless Beach, under vegetation on a sandy seashore, 26.32681°N, 126.77002°E, Alt.: 3 m, 17.May.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Miyako-jima Is.: 1♀, Nobaru Ueno, Pinza-Abu cave (ピンザアブ洞穴), 57 m, long and muddy cave, dark zone, 24.74853°N, 125.33443°E, 13.Nov.2020, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Ishigaki-jima Is.: 4♀, Tonoshiro, Fukubukuīzā Daiichi-do cave (フクブクイーザー第1洞), 66 m, long and humid cave with a small creek, 24.36533°N, 124.17721°E, 9.Nov.2020, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 4♀, same locality, 11.Nov.2020, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC) ; Yonaguni-jima Is.: 1♀, Irizaki, under stones in a meadow near the seashore, 24.44499°N, 122.9411°E, 30 m a.s.l., 4.Mar.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC).

Diagnosis

This species is closely related to H. alba sp. nov. and H. subterranea sp. nov. from which it can be easily distinguished by the presence of pigmentation and well-developed eyes (vs pigmentation and eyes lacking in both the other species) (Fig. 1H–J cf. Figs 2H–J, 3A–C). Males of H. mogera can also be separated from males of H. alba sp. nov. by the thinner paracymbium (P) and the more squared and stockier distal process of paracymbium (Di) (vs wider P and longer and slightly sharper Di in H. alba sp. nov.) (Figs 1A, B, D, 4A–C cf. Figs 2A, B, D, 4E–G). Females of H. mogera are distinguished from females of H. alba sp. nov. and H. subterranea sp. nov. by the shape of scapus (Sc), rectangular and with a flat posterior margin (vs stockier and larger Sc in H. alba sp. nov. or longer and distally dilatated Sc in H. subterranea sp. nov., both having a rounded posterior margin) (Figs 1E–G, 4D cf. Figs 2E–G, 3D, E, 4H, 13E). See also Lin et al. (2016) for the diagnosis of H. mogera with other congeners of the same species group.

Figure 1. 

Howaia mogera A male palp (holotype), ventral view B same, retrolateral view C same, ventro-prolateral view D same, dorsal view E female epigyne ventral view (specimen from Tokyo area) F same after dissection, shape variation G vulva, dorsal view H habitus of male (specimen from Tokyo area) I habitus of female J cephalic area of female, frontal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G, J); 1.0 mm (H, I).

Figure 2. 

Howaia alba sp. nov. A male palp (holotype), ventral view B same, retrolateral view C same, ventro-prolateral view D same, dorsal view E female epigyne (one of the paratypes), ventral view F same, shape variation G vulva, dorsal view H habitus of male (holotype) I habitus of female (one of the paratypes) J cephalic area of female, frontal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G, J); 1.0 mm (H, I).

Figure 3. 

Howaia subterranea sp. nov. A habitus of female (holotype) B cephalic area of female, frontal view C habitus of female, lateral view D female epigyne, ventral view E vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C); 0.2 mm (B, D, E).

Figure 4. 

Genitalia of Howaia mogera and H. alba sp. nov. A male palp of H. mogera, ventral view B same, retrolateral view C detail or paracymbium, dorsal view E female epigyne, ventral view E male palp of H. alba sp. nov., ventral view F same, retrolateral view C detail or paracymbium, dorsal view H female epigyne, ventral view. Abbreviations: Cl – lobe of conductor; Cm – median process of conductor; Co – copulatory opening; Cp – prolateral process of conductor; Cr – retrolateral process of conductor; Di – distal process of paracymbium; E – embolus; P – paracymbium; Ra – radical apophysis; Rx – radix; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus; Sd – sperm duct; St – subtegulum; Te – tegulum; Ve – ventral process of paracymbium. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Redescription of male

(holotype). (redescription of habitus based on freshly collected specimen from Tokyo area due to the discoloration of the holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 1H. Total length. 1.94, Prosoma 1.10 long, 0.89 wide. Carapace rounded, yellowish with slightly darker striae. Cervical groove and fovea distinct. Eyes well developed. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.06, ALE = 0.09, PME = 0.09, PLE = 0.09, AMEALE = 0.03, ALEPLE = 0.00. Chelicerae, labium, maxillae, and sternum of same color as carapace. Legs uniformly yellowish. Legs measurements: I 5.07 (1.41, 0.43, 1.30, 1.24, 0.69), II 3.85 (1.10, 0.38, 0.90, 0.89, 0.58), III 3.26 (0.97, 0.33, 0.73, 0.73, 0.50), IV 4.44 (1.29, 0.40, 1.11, 1.06, 0.58). Opisthosoma uniformly dark grey with slightly lighter mark on antero-dorsal side.

Male palp as in Figs 1A–D, 4A–C. Cymbium relatively elongated, 3–4 robust spines on distal-prolateral margin (Fig. 1D). Paracymbium with 1 distal (Di) and 1 ventral (Ve) processes. Distal process short, squared, and stocky, distinctly sclerotized. Ventral process sharp, spine-like, headed internally (Figs 1A–D, 4A–D). Embolus (E) long and filiform, origin of embolus positioned at ~ 6:00 o’clock on radix (Rx). Radical apophysis (Ra) broad and dorsally flat with a granulate surface. Conductor with 3 distinct processes (Cp, Cr, Cm) and a half-transparent distal lobe (Cl). Prolateral process (Cp) flat and long, ribbon-like, headed counterclockwise, wrapped around the embolus. Retrolateral process of conductor (Cr) wide and thick, curved internally, with a broadened, flat central part. Median process of conductor (Cm) strongly sclerotized, short and stout, horn-like, ending with a blunt tip and having a smaller, stout ventral process (Figs 1A–C, 4A, B).

Redescription of female

(based on specimen from Tokyo). Habitus as in Figs 1I, 15A. Total length: 2.44, Prosoma 1.19 long, 0.98 width. Cephalic area as in Fig. 1J. Carapace piriform. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.05, ALE = 0.08, PME = 0.08, PLE = 0.08, AMEALE = 0.04, ALEPLE = 0.01. Legs measurements: I 4.93 (1.42, 0.44, 1.28, 1.15, 0.64), II 3.96 (1.08, 0.39, 0.85, 0.78, 0.54), III 2.88 (0.86, 0.33, 0.63, 0.62, 0.44), IV 4.22 (1.30, 0.41, 1.10, 0.89, 0.52). Coloration and other details as in male.

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 1E–G, 4D. Scapus (Sc) elongated antero-posteriorly, rectangular, slightly longer than wide, ending with a flat posterior margin (Figs 1E–G, 4D). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, V-shaped. Copulatory ducts (Cd) straight, short, and thick, gradually diverging from each other, slightly coiled in the first half of the trait before reaching the spermathecae. Insemination ducts (Id) thin, coiled around the copulatory ducts. Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 1.5 their diameter (Fig. 1G).

Size variation

Male (based on 5 specimens): total length: 1.89–2.02, prosoma length: 0.84–1.07, prosoma width: 0.76–0.85. Female (based on 10 specimens): total length: 2.08–2.88, prosoma length: 0.96–1.15; prosoma width: female: 0.87–0.96.

Distribution

East Asia (from South China to Korea and Japan). Introduced to Europe, Azerbaijan, and several oceanic islands (Hawaii, Fiji, Reunion, St. Helena, etc.). Although it is likely that H. mogera is naturally distributed in Asia, its precise center of origin, as well as the time and mode of its dispersion outside the Asian continent, are still unstudied. In Japan the species is widespread along the whole country in both mainland Japan and the Ryukyus (Fig. 16C, D).

Habitat and ecology

This species has a broad environmental tolerance. In Japan H. mogera can be found in a wide range of habitats, both natural and artificial, including caves, mines, artificial tunnels, small animal burrows, forest leaf litter, humid meadows, paddy fields, marshes, urban parks, greenhouses, vegetated seashores, coastal environments, etc. Howaia mogera usually builds simple scaffold webs in external habitats, under superficial stones, in empty spaces among the leaf litter or at the base of tufts of grass. Apparently, the populations living in mainland Japan are found less commonly in caves or cave-like habitats. In contrast, in addition to epigean environments, the populations living in the Ryukyu islands can be found more frequently in natural subterranean habitats, dwelling in both the twilight and dark areas of caves and tunnels.

Remarks on intraspecific variation

Coloration and pattern of the opisthosoma can be rather variable, depending on the population or individual. Usually, populations living in mainland Japan show a darker habitus with an opisthosoma uniformly black or dark grey, sometimes having one or few small lighter marks on the dorsal side (Figs 1H, I, 15A). Instead, individuals living in the Ryukyus seems to show a lighter pattern bearing several larger greyish dorsal marks, often merged together forming a continuous median stripe. Such pattern is shared by the southern Chinese populations (see Liu and Li 2013: fig. 18B). Legs are usually uniformly yellowish; however, some individuals show a faint darker annulation on the distal part of femur and tibia. The shape of scapus can also be slightly variable among individuals or populations, ranging from strongly rectangular to slightly inverted-trapezoidal or shorter and more squared, more rarely with strongly rounded distal margin (e.g., see Fig. 1E, F and Liu and Li 2013: fig. 18C, D). Yaginuma (1972: 620) illustrated a scapus with a strongly triangular shape for the paratype of H. mogera. Such extreme shape is abnormal and never observed by us in any of the examined specimens. In addition, the drawing by Yaginuma does not perfectly match with the shape of the scapus of the original sample (paratype NMST-Ar.74 from Tenryu-shi) which shows a normal rectangularly-shaped scapus.

Remarks on misidentifications

Howaia mogera was initially misidentified by Yaginuma (1970) and described as the male of Nesticus (= Nesticella) terrestris based on a specimen from Tamagawa, Tokyo. Soon after Yaginuma recognized the mistake and described the species as new based on the same male together with a female specimen from Shizuoka (Yaginuma 1972). Until now H. mogera has been recorded in several different countries and redescribed and illustrated numerous times by different authors (World Spider Catalog 2023). However, these descriptions were all based on specimens collected far from the type locality, in different Asian countries (e.g., Korea: Kim et al. 1999, Kim and Lee 2018; China: Gong and Zhu 1982, Liu and Li 2013) or based on introduced populations (e.g., Fiji Is.: Lehtinen and Saaristo 1980; Hawaii Is.: Gertsch 1984; Azeirbaijan: Marusik and Guiseinov 2003; Poland: Bielak-Bielecki and Rozwalka 2011; Italy: Pantini et al. 2020). Herein, for the first time after the original description, we illustrate and redescribe the holotype and additional specimens from the type locality area.

In the past, the lack of information about the taxonomy of H. mogera, and in general on Nesticella species, has been the cause of misidentifications by senior arachnologists, sometimes confusing this species with other similar congeners. For example, the male of the blind H. mogera specimens from Miyako-jima Is. illustrated by Shimojana (1977) refers to the newly described H. alba sp. nov. Paik (1996) recorded Nesticus (= Nesticella) brevipes from South Korea based on female specimens. The illustrated samples do not match the morphology of this species (cf. Figs 5I, E–G, 7D and Paik 1996: figs 1–10) and probably they refer to more than one species of Nesticella or Howaia. Among them, the shape of epigyne and internal ducts of the specimens of the so-called groups A or B fits well with those of H. mogera (Paik 1996: figs 6, 9, 10). Illustration of the female of H. mogera by Zhu and Zhang (2011: fig. 34A–C), clearly do not refer to this species, the illustrated epigyne and vulva being morphologically different from those found in the genus Howaia.

Remarks on phylogeny and biogeography

Previous molecular analyses suggest that populations of H. mogera in Eastern Asia group into two well-distinct subclades with non-overlapping distribution, distributed respectively in North-Eastern Asia (= north clade) and South China (= south clade) (Zhang and Li 2013; Ballarin and Li 2018; this work). In Japan both these two clades are apparently present. The north clade is distributed in mainland Japan covering the islands of Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu. Its southernmost boundary seems to correspond to the island of Yakushima (Fig. 16C). The south clade shares the same genetic pattern of the southern China populations (Fig. 14) and it is widespread along the whole Ryukyus and in the island of Hachijo-jima Is., south of Tokyo (Fig. 16C, D). The presence of the south clade in Hachijo-jima Is., far away from the other known records, suggests a possible artificial introduction to this island. Some degrees of genetic difference (2.5–3.7%) and slight variations in the body pattern and habitat preference can be observed in populations belonging to the two clades (see remarks on habitat and variation discussed above). Nevertheless, no clear distinct morphological differences are observed in their genitalia. The result of our species delimitation analysis only partially supports them as two distinct species (Fig. 14). It is possible that they represent two cryptic species or, more likely, an early stage of species differentiation which is still in progress nowadays.

Howaia alba sp. nov.

Figs 2A–J, 4E–H, 15C, 16B (Japanese name: tsuzupisuki-horahimegumo ツヅピスキホラヒメグモ)

Nesticella mogera Shimojana 1977: 353, fig. 6 (♂, misidentification).

Type material

Holotype (NMST-Ar. 25251): Japan: Okinawa Pref.: Miyako-jima Is.: Shimozato Hirara, Oharaminami Park, Tsuzupisuki-abu cave (ツヅピスキアブ), 32 m, long and humid cave, in the dark zone of the cave, 24.79468°N, 125.28192°E, 12.Nov.2020, F. Ballarin leg.

Paratypes: Japan: Miyako-jima Is.: 3♀, same data as the holotype (NSMT-Ar 25252); 1♀, same locality 14.Nov.2020, F. Ballarin leg. (RMUF); 5♀, same locality, 16.Sep.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (2♀ MNHAH, 3♀ FBPC); 4♀, Nobaru Ueno, Pinza-abu cave (ピンザアブ洞穴), 57 m, long and muddy cave, in the dark zone of the cave, 24.74853°N, 125.33443°E, 13.Nov.2020, F. Ballarin leg. (RMUF); 3♀, same locality, 17.Sep.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC).

Other material examined

Japan: Miyako-jima Is.: 1 juv., Nakabari, Nakabari Limestone Cave (仲原鍾乳洞), 24.73384°N, 125.37610°E, 29.Dec.2021, R. Miyata leg. (FBPC).

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Latin word for the color white (albus, adjective) referring to the whitish coloration of the species.

Diagnosis

The new species is similar to H. mogera and to the troglobitic species H. rongtangensis (Lin, Ballarin & Li, 2016) from Hainan Island, H. subterranea sp. nov., and N. occulta sp. nov. Male of H. alba sp. nov. can be distinguished from male of H. mogera and H. rongtangensis by the different shape of the larger paracymbium (P) bearing a longer, slimmer, and sharper distal process (Di) (vs slimmer P with a shorter, larger, and blunter Di in H. mogera and H. rongtangensis) (Figs 2A–D, 4E–G cf. Figs 1A–D, 4A–C and Lin et al. 2016: fig. 44A, B, D). Female of the new species are distinguished from female of H. mogera, H. subterranea sp. nov., and N. occulta sp. nov. by the larger and stockier scapus (Sc) with a slightly rounded posterior margin (vs slimmer Sc with a flat posterior margin in H. mogera, a longer Sc with a wider lobated tip in H. subterranea sp. nov., and a slimmer, tongue-like Sc ending with a strongly concave tip in N. occulta sp. nov.) (Figs 2E–G, 4H cf. Figs 1E–G, 3D, E, 4D, 11C, D, 13E, F).

Description of male

(holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 2H. Total length 1.88. Prosoma 0.94 long, 0.83 wide. Carapace uniformly pale yellowish. Eyes completely degenerated and reduced to white maculae. Cervical groove and fovea indistinct. Chelicerae brownish. Labium, maxillae, and sternum of the same pale color as carapace. Legs uniformly pale yellowish. Leg formula: I, IV, II, III. Legs measurements as follows: I 6.17 (1.61, 0.47, 1.60, 1.72, 0.77), II 4.71 (1.32, 0.39, 1.20, 1.18, 0.62), III 3.89 (1.11, 0.31, 0.95, 1.02, 0.50), IV 5.17 (1.50, 0.37, 1.34, 1.31, 0.65). Opisthosoma uniformly greyish-yellow, covered with long, sparse hairs.

Male palp as in Figs 2A–D, 4E–G. Cymbium relatively elongated, covered with thin sparse setae, bearing some thicker setae on the distal-prolateral margin (Fig. 2D). Paracymbium with a single distinctly sclerotized, stocky distal process (Di), slightly elongated near the tip and a single sharp, spine-like ventral process (Ve) (Figs 2A–D, 4E–G). Embolus (E) long and filiform, origin of embolus positioned at ~ 6:00 o’clock on radix (Rx). Radical apophysis (Ra) broad, with a granulate surface. Conductor with 3 distinct processes (Cp, Cr, Cm) and a half-transparent distal lobe (Cl). Prolateral process of the conductor (Cp) flat, ribbon-like and headed counterclockwise, wrapped around embolus. Retrolateral process of conductor (Cr) wide and thick, curved internally, with a broadened, flat central part. Median process of conductor (Cm) stout, horn-like, strongly sclerotized bearing a smaller, stout ventral process. (Figs 2A–C, 4E, F).

Description of female

(one of the paratypes). Habitus as in Figs 2I, 15C. Total length 2.3. Prosoma 1.09 long, 0.92 wide. Cephalic area as in Fig. 2J. Coloration and other details as in male. Legs measurements as follows: I 6.56 (1.83, 0.50, 1.74, 1.67, 0.82), II 5.09 (1.46, 0.42, 1.27, 1.22, 0.72), III 4.09 (1.31, 0.36, 0.90, 0.92, 0.60), IV 5.46 (1.65, 0.45, 1.42, 1.27, 0.67).

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 2E–G, 4H. Scapus (Sc) short and stumpy, approximately as long as wide, ending with a slightly rounded posterior margin (Figs 2E, F, 4H). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, shaped as a narrow V. Copulatory ducts (Cd) short and thick, slightly divergent to each other, slightly twisted in the inner trait with 1 coil, curving outward and then inward before reaching the spermathecae. Insemination ducts (Id) thin, coiled around the Cd). Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 2× their diameter (Fig. 2G).

Size variation

Female (based on 5 specimens): total length: 2.00–2.67, prosoma length: 1.05–1.12, prosoma width: 0.92–0.97.

Distribution

Endemic to Miyako-jima Is., Ryukyus, Japan (Fig. 16B).

Habitat and ecology

Howaia alba sp. nov. is found in the natural caves in Miyako-jima Is. This species builds simple scaffold webs between rocks and in crevices at the base of the walls or on the floor of the caves. It dwells exclusively in the dark zone of the caves, in areas characterized by relatively high and uniform temperature and humidity (e.g., Tsuzupisuki-abi cave: temp: 25.2 °C, hum: 94.1%; Pinza-Abu cave: temp: 25.1 °C, hum: 92.6%) (Fig. 15G). Adults of Howaia alba sp. nov. were observed preying on Schizomida (Bamazomus siamensis (Hansen, 1905) which roam the floor of the caves in Miyako-jima Is. Females carrying the eggs cocoon attached to their spinnerets were also observed (but not collected) sitting on webs or wandering under rocks. Despite extensive surveying, no specimens were found in the numerous artificial tunnels or underground water reserves dug in the limestone rocks of the island. The complete absence of eyes and pigmentation, the lack of external records and the finding of the species only in the deepest areas of the caves identify H. alba sp. nov. as a true troglobiont.

Remarks on misidentifications

This species was recorded and illustrated for the first time by Shimojana (1977: fig. 6A–C). Due to the general similarities in the shape of genitalia, it was identified as H. mogera although the author highlighted the lack of eyes in these specimens (Shimojana 1977: 353). Our analysis, based on both morphology and molecular data, supports H. alba sp. nov. as a closely related species but clearly distinct from H. mogera.

Howaia subterranea sp. nov.

Figs 3A–E, 13E, 16B (Japanese name: kaiken-horahimegumo カイケンホラヒメグモ)

Material examined

Holotype: Japan: Kagoshima Pref.: Okinoerabu-jima Is.: 1♀, Kaikendo cave (海見洞), 3.May.2004 H. Tamura leg. (NSMT-Ar 25253).

Etymology

The new species is named after the Latin adjective subterraneus (= underground, subterranean). It refers to the troglobitic lifestyle of this species.

Diagnosis

This species is similar to H. mogera and the other troglobiont species H. alba sp. nov. and N. occulta sp. nov. Howaia subterranea sp. nov. can be distinguished from these species by the different shape of the epigyne, having curved internal ducts (vs straight ducts in the other three species), and a longer scapus (Sc) with an enlarged tip (vs a shorter and more rectangular Sc with a flat distal margin in H. mogera, a shorter and stockier Sc in H. alba sp. nov., and a shorter, tongue-like Sc in N. occulta sp. nov., all of them lacking a clearly enlarged tip) (Figs 3D, E, 13E cf. Figs 1E–G, 2E–G, 4D, H). In addition, the new species can be easily distinguished from H. mogera and the other Japanese species by the lack of eyes and pigmentation (vs present in the other troglophilic congeners).

Description

Female (holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 3A, C. Total length 2.65. Prosoma 1.20 long, 0.93 wide. Carapace piriform, uniformly pale yellowish. Eyes strongly degenerated, reduced to white maculae (Fig. 3B). Cervical groove and fovea indistinct. Chelicerae uniformly brownish. Labium, maxillae, and sternum pale yellowish as carapace. Legs uniformly pale yellowish. Legs measurements (leg III missing): I 6.73 (1.95, 0.46, 1.82, 1.65, 0.85), II 5.24 (1.56, 0.45, 1.29, 1.22, 0.72), III (-), IV 5.75 (1.76, 0.46, 1.54, 1.32, 0.67). Opisthosoma uniformly greyish, covered by long, sparse hairs.

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 3D, E, 13E. Scapus (Sc) elongated antero-posteriorly, ~ 2× longer than wide, ending with an enlarged, lobated tip (Figs 3D, 13E). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, shaped as a narrow curly bracket. Copulatory ducts (Cd) bent in middle trait, first trait slightly curved outward then curving anteriorly before reaching spermathecae (Figs 3D, E, 13E). Insemination ducts (Id) thin, coiled around the copulatory ducts. Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 2.5× their diameter (Fig. 3D, E).

Male. Unknown.

Distribution

Endemic to Okinoerabu-jima Island. Known only from the type locality (Fig. 16B).

Habitat and ecology

Howaia subterranea sp. nov. has probably been collected in the dark zone of the type locality cave. The lack of pigmentation and the strongly reduced eyes further suggest this species as a true troglobiont. Nevertheless, the lack of specimens and additional information do not allow us to define in detail the ecology and micro-habitat preference of this species as well as its precise phylogenetic position. Nevertheless, the morphology of epigyne clearly identify H. subterranea sp. nov. as belonging to the genus Howaia.

Nesticella Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980

Type species

Nesticus nepalensis Hubert, 1973 from Nepal.

Nesticella brevipes group

Nesticella brevipes (Yaginuma, 1970)

Figs 5A–J, 7A–D, 16A (Japanese name: ko-horahimegumo コホラヒメグモ)

Theridion pilula Komatsu 1940: 194, fig. 5a–d (♀, misidentification).

Nesticus brevipes Yaginuma 1970: 386, figs 1, 2 (♂); Yamaguchi and Yaginuma 1971: 172, figs 1, 2 (♀); Yaginuma 1972: 619, fig. 2 (♂♀); Irie 1981: 31, figs 1–3 (♂♀); Chikuni 1989: 45, fig. 3 (♂♀); Kamura and Irie 2009: 353, fig. 106 (♀).

Type locality

Japan Shikoku Is., Kochi Pref., Tosa-Yamada-cho, Sakagawa, Ryuga-dō cave (龍河洞).

Material examined

Japan: Honshu Is.: Wakayama Pref.: 1♀, Higashimuro-gun, Kushimoto, 23.Aug.1993, A. Tanikawa leg. (FBPC); Shiga Pref.: 1♀, Koga, Shigaraki-cho, Miyajiri, 28.Jun.2022, M. Yoshida leg. (FBPC); 1♀, Otsu, Sakamoto, 23.Jul.2022, M. Yoshida leg. (FBPC); Shikoku Is.: Tokushima Pref: 2♀, Tokushima, Nyūtachō, Konji, Konjiji temple (建治寺), narrow and dry tunnel in the cliff near the temple, 34.02769°N, 134.42923°E, 13.May.2019, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Kochi Pref.: 1♀ (holotype), Kami, Tosayamadacho Sakakawa, Ryuga-dō cave (龍河洞), 11.Apr.1970, S. Ueno leg. (NMST-Ar.75); 1♂ (paratype), same data and locality (NMST-Ar.76); Kyushu Is.: Saga Pref.: 1♀, Fujicho, 31.Jul.2005, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); Kumamoto Pref.: 1♂, 3♀, Aso-gun, Aso-machi, Kikuchi Keikoku gorge, 8.Aug.2003, T. Irie leg. (NSMT-Ar.5689); same locality, 11.Jul.2004, T. Irie leg. (NSMT-Ar.5713); 1♂, 2♀, Kami-mashiki-gun, Tonochi-machi, Kashiwagawa, 23.May.2004, T. Irie leg. (NMST-Ar.5728, identified as H. mogera); 1♀, Kuma-gun, Itsuki-mura, Otaki, 13.May.2004, T. Irie leg. (NMST-Ar.5721); Ōita Pref.: 2♀, Ōita-shi, Ochi Shimohetsugi, Ōzuru-doukustu-iseki cave (尾津留洞窟遺跡), 38 m large and rather dry cave, 33.16747°N, 131.67679°E, 17.Mar.2019, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Kagoshima Pref.: 2♀, Minami Kyushu-shi, Kawabe-cho, 26.Feb.2007, K. Ishii leg. (NMST-Ar.14585, identified as H. mogera); 1♀, Minamisatsuma-shi, Kasasa-cho; 9.Dec.2007, K. Ishii leg. (NSMT-Ar.14513).

Diagnosis

This species is closely related to N. terrestris and N. silvicola. Male of N. brevipes can be distinguished from male of the latter two species by the presence of two distal processes of paracymbium (Di-I–II), a sharper radical apophysis (Ra), and a thinner median process of conductor (Cm) (vs a single, sharper Di, a stockier Ra, and a thicker Cm in N. terrestris and N. silvicola). (Figs 5A–D, 7A–C cf. Figs 6A–D, 7E–G, 8A–D, 10A–C). In addition, the origin of the embolus (E) from the radix is located in a different position than in N. terrestris (4:30 o’clock in N. brevipes vs 6:00 o’clock in N. terrestris) (Figs 5A, 7A cf. Figs 6A, 7E).

Figure 5. 

Nesticella brevipes A male palp (paratype), ventral view B same, retrolateral view C same, ventro-prolateral view D same, dorsal view E female epigyne (holotype), ventral view F same, female from Kyushu G vulva, dorsal view H habitus of male (old specimen from Kyushu); I habitus of female (specimen from Shikoku); J cephalic area of female, frontal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G, J); 1.0 mm (H, I).

Figure 6. 

Nesticella terrestris A male palp (one of the topotypes), ventral view B same, retrolateral view C same, ventro-prolateral view D same, dorsal view E female epigyne (topotype), ventral view F same after dissection, shape variation G vulva, dorsal view H habitus of male (topotype) I habitus of female J cephalic area of female, frontal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G, J); 1.0 mm (H, I).

Figure 7. 

Genitalia of Nesticella brevipes and N. terrestris A male palp of N. brevipes, ventral view B same, retrolateral view C detail or paracymbium, dorsal view E female epigyne, ventral view E male palp of N. terrestris, ventral view F same, retrolateral view C detail or paracymbium, dorsal view H female epigyne, ventral view. Abbreviations: Cl – lobe of conductor; Cm – median process of conductor; Co – copulatory opening; Cp – prolateral process of conductor; Cr – retrolateral process of conductor; Di I–II – distal process(es) I and II of paracymbium; Do – dorsal process of paracymbium; E – embolus; P – paracymbium; Ra – radical apophysis; Rx – radix; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus; Sd – sperm duct; St – subtegulum; Te – tegulum; Ve I–II – ventral processes I and II of paracymbium. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Figure 8. 

Nesticella silvicola sp. nov. A male palp (holotype), ventral view B same, retrolateral view C same, ventro-prolateral view D same, dorsal view E female epigyne (one of the paratypes), ventral view F same, from shape variation G vulva, dorsal view H habitus of male I habitus of female J cephalic area of female, frontal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G, J); 1.0 mm (H, I).

Female of N. brevipes can be separated from female of N. terrestris and N. silvicola by the slimmer scapus (Sc), approximately as long as wide, usually with a more rounded posterior margin (vs a larger Sc, ~ 1.5–2.0× wider than long, having a flatter posterior margin in N. terrestris and N. silvicola) (Figs 5E, F, 7D cf. Figs 6E, F, 7H, 8E, F, 10D). In addition, N. brevipes shows wider spermathecae (S) than the diameter of the copulatory ducts (Cd) (vs same diameter of Cd in N. terrestris and N. silvicola) and internal ducts with a more convoluted and irregular trend (vs more straight ducts in N. terrestris or strongly bent in the middle in N. silvicola both with less clear coils). (Figs 5E–G cf. Figs 6E–G, 8E–G). In addition, N. brevipes is generally smaller is size than N. terrestris (females 1.76–2.50 vs 2.31–3.30, see also Fig. 17A, B).

Redescription of male

(paratype). Habitus as in Fig. 5H. Total length 1.94. Prosoma 1.02 long, 0.87 wide. Carapace rounded, uniformly brown-yellowish with borders and central area slightly darker. Cervical groove and fovea distinct. Chelicerae, labium, maxillae, and sternum of the same uniform color as carapace. Eyes well developed. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.03, ALE = 0.06, PME = 0.07, PLE = 0.07, AMEALE = 0.04, ALEPLE = 0.00. Legs uniformly pale yellowish. Legs measurements: I 7.28 (2.04, 0.47, 1.92, 2.04, 0.81), II 5.70 (1.70, 0.43, 1.44, 1.45, 0.68), III 4.23 (1.30, 0.38, 0.96, 1.00, 0.59), IV 5.56 (1.86, 0.43, 1.51, 1.18, 0.58). Opisthosoma greyish with large black marks on dorsal and frontal sides.

Male palp as in Figs 5A–D, 7A–C. Cymbium relatively short, covered with sparse setae, several thicker setae on distal-prolateral margin (Fig. 5D). Paracymbium with 2 hook-like distal processes (Di-I–II), 2 ventral processes (Ve-I–II), and a single dorsal apophysis (Do). Distal process I (Di-I) thick, headed antero-retrolaterally; distal process II (Di-II) slimmer and sharper, headed retrolaterally; ventral process I (Ve-I) short and stocky, headed internally; ventral process II (Ve-II) long and lobated, headed internally; dorsal apophysis (Do) lobated, wide and flat (Figs 5A–D, 7A–C). Embolus (E) long and filiform, origin of embolus positioned at ~ 4:30 o’clock on radix (Rx). Radical apophysis (Ra) strongly sclerotized, triangular with a rather sharp tip. Conductor with 3 distinct processes (Cp, Cr, Cm) and a half-transparent distal lobe (Cl). Prolateral process of the conductor (Cp) flat, ribbon-like, headed counterclockwise and wrapped around embolus. Retrolateral process of conductor (Cr) wide and thick, curved inside. Median process of conductor (Cm) tiny and slim, strongly sclerotized with a ribbon-like lobe wrapped around its prolateral side (Figs 5A–C, 7A, B).

Redescription of female

(holotype). Habitus (fresh specimen from Shikoku) as in Fig. 5I. Total length 2.24. Prosoma 1.02 long, 0.92 wide. Cephalic area as in Fig. 5J. Carapace piriform. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.02, ALE = 0.06, PME = 0.05, PLE = 0.06, AMEALE = 0.05, ALEPLE = 0.00. Coloration and other details as in male. Legs yellowish with darker annulation on femur and tibia. Legs measurements as follows: I 6.55 (1.88, 0.46, 1.74, 1.66, 0.81), II 5.07 (1.52, 0.40, 1.24, 1.21, 0.70), III 3.85 (1.20, 0.30, 0.85, 0.91, 0.59), IV 5.23 (1.67, 0.43, 1.31, 1.17, 0.65).

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 5E–G, 7D. Scapus (Sc) short and stumpy, approximately as long as wide, ending with a rounded, convex posterior margin (Figs 5E, F, 7D). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, shaped as a narrow V. Copulatory ducts (Cd) short, straight, and thick, slightly divergent from each other. Insemination ducts thin, coiled around the copulatory ducts. Spermathecae (S) rounded, slightly wider than copulatory ducts, separated from each other by ~ 2× their diameter (Fig. 5G).

Size variation

Male (based on 3 specimens): total length: 1.94–2.31, prosoma length: 1.02–1.17, prosoma width: 0.87–0.99. Female (based on 10 specimens): total length: 1.76–2.50, prosoma length: 0.90–1.15, prosoma width: 0.81–0.99.

Distribution

Western Japan (Shikoku, Kyushu, western Honshu?), China? (Fig. 16A). The easternmost limit of this species in Japan seems to be located in the Kansai area where it apparently overlaps with the distribution of N. terrestris (Fig. 16A). The precise boundaries between these two species remain unclear. All samples and published drawings of N. brevipes from China, Korea, and Russian Far East checked by us refer to different species of Nesticella. In lack of clear records, the presence of this species outside Japan remains unconfirmed although it seems unlikely. See also “remarks on misidentifications” for additional information.

Habitat and ecology

Nesticella brevipes can be found in humid and shadowed environments such as undergrowth of deciduous and evergreen forests growing in narrow valleys, vegetated cliffs, screes, caves, and artificial tunnels. This species builds simple scaffold webs in empty spaces among the leaf litter, between rocks or in the crevices in the walls and on the floor of caves. In subterranean environments we collected this species in both the twilight and the dark zones.

Remarks on intraspecific variation

Like many other nesticid species N. brevipes shows a certain degree of intraspecific variation in the shape of genitalia and in particular in the shape of the scapus of the female epigyne. Some individuals from Shikoku Is. (e.g., from Kikuchi Keikoku Gorge), and especially populations from the Kansai area, show a more squared scapus with the posterior margin more flattened than normal. A high degree of intraspecific genetic divergence (7.6%) is also observed between the population living in Shikoku Is. and Kyushu Is.

Remarks on misidentifications

Nesticella brevipes was first described and illustrated by Komatsu (1940) based on specimens from Ryuga-do cave in the island of Shikoku but wrongly identified as Theridion pilula (= Phoroncidia pilula (Karsch, 1879), Fam. Theridiidae Sundevall, 1833). Yaginuma (1970: p. 386–388, figs 1, 2) recognized the species as new to science and described it based on specimens from the same cave. Nevertheless, he misidentified the male of the closely related N. terrestris thus reporting under N. brevipes a mix of specimens from the two species (Yaginuma 1970: p. 388, 390). Two years later Yaginuma (1972: p. 619–621), in his revision of short-legged nesticids from Japan, synonymized N. terrestris with N. brevipes although it recognized them as belonging to different morpho-groups based on the morphology of the male palp and female epigyne. The outcome of our study, based on both morphological and molecular evidence, clearly supports the original separation of N. brevipes and N. terrestris as two distinct species.

Since the time of its description Nesticella brevipes “sensu lato” has been frequently recorded by Japanese or foreign authors, in Japan and in other surrounding countries (World Spider Catalog 2023, see Shinkai et al. 2022 for the Japanese records). Nevertheless, due to the previous synonymization of N. terrestris with N. brevipes, it is difficult to understand to which species these records refer without directly checking the genitalia of the specimens. Thus, in this work we considered only the records of N. brevipes which samples have been directly examined by us or of which clear published drawings of genitalia were available. Based on the examined material we confirm the presence of N. brevipes in the island of Kyushu and Shikoku and in the Kansai area. We could not check any specimen from the Chugoku area thus the presence of this species in the western part of the Honshu Island, although possible, still needs to be properly confirmed. All records from central-eastern Honshu examined by us refer instead to the similar N. terrestris (see Fig. 16A). Yaginuma (1970, 1972) cited the presence of an unusual population of N. brevipes inhabiting some caves in Mie Prefecture (e.g., Fubonji-do cave). These specimens show partially reduced eyes (Yaginuma 1970: fig. 10) and, apparently, morphological characters of palp and epigyne mixed between those of N. brevipes and N. terrestris (Yaginuma 1972: p. 620, fig. 3). We did not have the opportunity to examine these specific specimens; however, other samples collected in both epigean and hypogean environments in Mie Pref. and checked by us refer to the similar N. terrestris. It is possible that the Nesticella from Fubonji-do cave represent a different and still undescribed troglobitic species. Irie (1981), in his work on cave spiders from Kyushu, illustrate a population of N. brevipes from the Kikuchi Keikoku Gorge, northern Kumamoto Pref., which female show a wide and squared scapus (Irie 1981, figs 2, 3). These specimens were examined by us and, although some individuals have the scapus more squared and sometimes wider than usual, both males and female show the diagnostic characters of N. brevipes.

Concerning the records outside Japan, specimens of N. brevipes from Kuril Is. (Marusik and Crawford 2006) were inspected by us and they refer to N. terrestris. We did not have the possibility to check samples from Korea, nevertheless none of the published drawings of Korean specimens show the diagnostic characters of N. brevipes. Based on the shape of the epigyne they clearly refer to H. mogera (cf. Figs 1A–G, 4A–D vs Paik 1996: figs 6, 9, 10) or to other species of Nesticella of the N. brevipes group, including possibly N. terrestris (cf. Figs 5A–G, 7A–D vs Figs 6A–G, 7E–H vs Paik 1996: figs 7, 8 vs Namkung 2002: fig. 80a, b vs Kim and Lee 2018: fig. 27b, c). On the basis of these observations, we consider the presence of N. brevipes in Korea unlikely.

During his previous studies, the first author had the occasion to examine several Nesticella specimens from China identified as N. brevipes and preserved in the collections of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. All these specimens were revealed to be misidentifications of other endemic Nesticella or Howaia species. For example, the specimens determined as N. brevipes by Zhang and Li (2013) were recognized by the first author as H. huomachongensis (Lin, Ballarin & Li, 2016). The drawing of the male palp of N. brevipes from Zhejiang, China, published in Song et al. (1999) do not allow a clear identification of the species, it may refer to N. brevipes as well as another similar Chinese species of the N. brevipes group which was not yet described at the time of the publication of the book. Considering such circumstances, the presence of N. brevipes in China is unlikely but needs to be confirmed.

Nesticella terrestris (Yaginuma, 1970)

Figs 6A–J, 7E–H, 15B, 16A (Japanese name: azuma-ko-horahimegumo アズマコホラヒメグモ)

Nesticus terrestris Yaginuma 1970: 390, figs 3–6, 8 (♀) (described ♂ refers to H. mogera).

N. brevipes Yaginuma 1970: fig. 9 (♂, misidentification); Yamaguchi and Yaginuma 1971: 172, figs 1, 2 (♀, misidentification); Yaginuma 1972: 619, figs 3(?), 4 (♂♀, synonymized); Yaginuma 1977: 315, pl. 2, fig. 18 (♂); Yaginuma 1979: 275, pl. 6, figs 9, 10 (♂♀); Yaginuma 1986: 55, fig. 29.7 (♂♀); Namkung 2002: 80, fig. 12.4a, b (♂♀) (?); Kamura and Irie 2009: 353, figs 103–105, 107 (♂♀); Marusik and Kovblyuk 2011: 199, fig. 25.1, 2, 4, 5 (♂♀); Kim and Lee 2018: 26, fig. 11A–C (♂♀) (?).

Howaia brevipes Marusik and Crawford 2006: 187, figs 20, 32–33 (♂♀).

Type locality

Japan, Tokyo Pref., Mt. Kagenobuyama.

Material examined

Japan: Honshu Is.: Iwate Pref.: 1♀, Iwate-gun, Kuzumaki-machi, 4.Aug.1995, H. Okawa leg. (NSMT-Ar.11299, identified as N. brevipes); Miyagi Pref.: 1♂, 1♀, Minamisanriku-cho, Mt. Tatsugane, 21.July.2013, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); Akita Pref.: 1♀, Akita-shi, Shimokitateyanagitate, Akahira, 18.Jul.2005, A. Fukushima leg. (NSMT-Ar.17417, identified as N. brevipes); Yamagata Pref.: 3♀, Oguni-machi, Tamagawanakazato, 18.July.2010, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); 2♀, Nukumidaira, 18.July.2010, A. Tanikawa leg.; 1♀, Kotamagawa, 19.July.2010, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); 1♀, Sakata-shi, Tamasudarenotaki Waterfall, 38.99706°N, 140.05332°E, 27.Aug.2019, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Ibaraki Pref.: 1♀, Tsukuba-shi, Oda, Mt. Hokyo-san, 36.15260°N, 140.11853°E, 22.Aug.2017, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); 1♂, 1♀, Tsukuba-shi, Mt. Tsukuba, 36.22662°N, 140.09885°E, 29.Jun.2019, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Tochigi Pref.: 1♀, Imaichi-shi, Iwasaki, 12.Aug.1990, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); 1♀, Nikko-shi, 7.Jul.1996, Y. Suganami leg. (NSMT-Ar.17205, identified as N. brevipes); Saitama Pref.: 1♂, 2♀; Iruma-gun, Motoyama, near Kamakita cave, Aza-ana cave, 11.Aug.1974, leg. Unknown (FBPC); 3♂, Hiki-gun, Ogawa-machi, Kami-furutera, Furutera-do cave, 6.Jul.2019, T. Hiramatsu leg. (FBPC); 1♂, 6♀, Chichibu-shi, Kuroya, Iwane-do cave, 36.055145°N, 139.114867°E, 06.Nov.2022, T. Nagai leg. (TNPC); Chiba Pref: 1♂, Kamogawa-shi, Kiyosumi, 35.13982°N, 140.17725°E, 20.Feb.2020, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Tokyo Pref.: 1♀ (holotype), Mt. Kagenobuyama, 20.Dec.1968, E. Shinkai leg. (epigyne dissected and not present in the vial) (NMST-Ar.72); 1♂, 4♀ (topotypes, ~ 3 km Est of the type locality area of the species), Hachioji-shi, Hachioji, trail near the Hachioji castle ruins, 339 m, scree in a narrow valley near a temporary creek, 35.64654°N, 139.25175°E, 31.May.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 1♂, 1♀, Hachioji-shi, Mt. Jinba, 27.May.1984, H. Ono leg. (NSMT-Ar.13401, identified as N. brevipes); 1♀, Okutama-machi, Kaniwasawa, 35.83906°N, 139.07345°E, 27.Jun.2020, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); 1♀, Nishitama-gun, Nippara, near Ichiishiyama Shrine, 1015 m, leaf litter in a beech forest, 35.85506°N, 139.03513°E, 5.May.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Kanagawa Pref.: 1♂, Kawasaki-shi, Tama-ku, Ikuta Ryokuchi, 29.Jun.1991, M. Ban leg. (NSMT-Ar.10062, identified as N. brevipes); 1♀, Atsugi-shi, Nanasawa, 17.Apr.1997, M. Ban leg. (NSMT-Ar.10814, identified as N. brevipes); Fukui Pref.: 1♀, Onyu-gun, Natashou, Nagatani, 30.Jul.2002, K. Kumada leg. (NSMT-Ar.15214, identified as N. brevipes); Shizuoka Pref.: 1♂, 8♀, Tagata-gun, Amagiyugashima-cho, Mt. Ichiyama, 14.Feb.1983, K. Kumada leg. (NSMT-Ar.17762, identified as N. brevipes); 2♀, Kamo-gun, Higashiizu, Mt. Amagi, 18.Oct.1986, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); 2♀, Fujinomiya-shi, Myojoyama Park, 17.Nov.2014, A. Tanikawa leg. (MNHAH); 1♀, Fujinomiya-shi, Hitoana, Shin-ana Cave (新穴), long and humid lava cave (temp: 11.7 °C, hum: 95.3%), 35.36406°N, 138.59478°E, 725 m, 3.Dec.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 2♀, Hamamatsu-shi, Tenryu-ku, Ryokukeidai, 34.86801°N, 137.79494°E, 2–3.Jan.2018, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); 1♀, Susono-shi, Iwanami, Iwanami Fuketsu Wind Cave (岩波風穴), warm and humid lava cave (temp: 18.9 °C, hum: 99.9%), 35.21835°N, 138.92003°E, 255 m, 2.Dec.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Aichi Pref.: 1♀, Toyohashi-shi, Suse-cho, near the entrance of Susenoja-ana cave (嵩山蛇穴), 34.79678°N, 137.48575°E, litter of a mixed forest, 29.IX.2019, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); Mie Pref.: 2♀, Ise-shi, Ujitachi-cho, Naigu, Ise Jingu shrine, 8.Nov.2003, K. Kumada leg. (NSMT-Ar.14059); 1♂, 1♀, Kiya, Koumori-ana (こうもり穴), 27.Sep.–10.Oct.1980, Y. Terumi leg. (OMNH); Russia: Sakhalin Oblast: Moneron Is.: 1♂, 1♀, 23.Aug.2001, Y.M. Marusik leg. (YMPC, identified as N. brevipes).

Diagnosis

This species is closely related to N. brevipes and N. silvicola. But generally larger in size than the latter two species (females 2.31–3.30 vs 1.76–2.50 in N. brevipes and 1.84–1.94 in N. silvicola, see also Fig. 17A, B). Male of N. terrestris can be distinguished from male of N. brevipes by the presence of a single, sharper distal process of paracymbium (Di), a stockier radical apophysis ending with a rounded tip (Ra), and a thicker median process of the conductor (Cm) (vs two Di, a sharper Ra ending with a pointy tip, and a thinner Cm in N. brevipes). (Figs 6A–D, 7E–G cf. Figs 5A–D, 7A–C). It can be separated from male of N. silvicola by the sharper distal process of paracymbium (Di), the stockier and rounder radical apophysis (Ra), and by the thinner ventral process II of paracymbium (Ve-II), (vs stockier Di, sharper Ra, and wider Ve-II in N. silvicola). (Figs 6A–D, 7E–G cf. Figs 8A–D, 10A–C). In addition, the origin of the embolus I from the radix is located in a different position than in the other two species (6:00 o’clock in N. terrestris vs 4:30 o’clock in N. brevipes and N. silvicola) (Figs 6A, 7E cf. Figs 5A, 7A, 8A, 10A).

Figure 9. 

Nesticella insulana sp. nov. A male palp (holotype), ventral view B same, retrolateral view C same, ventro-prolateral view D same, dorsal view E female epigyne (one of the paratypes), ventral view F same, from shape variation G vulva, dorsal view H habitus of male I habitus of female J cephalic area of female, frontal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G, J); 1.0 mm (H, I).

Figure 10. 

Genitalia of Nesticella silvicola sp. nov. and N. insulana sp. nov. A male palp of N. silvicola sp. nov., ventral view B same, retrolateral view C detail or paracymbium, dorsal view E female epigyne, ventral view E male palp of N. insulana sp. nov., ventral view F same, retrolateral view C detail or paracymbium, dorsal view H female epigyne, ventral view. Abbreviations: Cl – lobe of conductor; Cm – median process of conductor; Co – copulatory opening; Cp – prolateral process of conductor; Cr – retrolateral process of conductor; Di I–II – distal process(es) I and II of paracymbium; Do – dorsal process of paracymbium; E – embolus; P – paracymbium; Ra – radical apophysis; Rx – radix; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus; Sd – sperm duct; St – subtegulum; Te – tegulum; Ve I–II – ventral processes I and II of paracymbium. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Female of N. terrestris can be separated from female of N. brevipes by the thicker and more squared scapus ~ 1.5–2× longer than wide and having a flat posterior margin (vs a slimmer scapus approximately as long as wide, with a rounded posterior margin in N. brevipes) (Figs 6E, F, 7H cf. Figs 5E, F, 7D). In addition, N. terrestris shows spermathecae (S) which diameter is approximately as wide as the copulatory ducts (vs S wider than copulatory ducts in N. brevipes) and straight internal ducts with a regular trend and few visible coils (vs ducts with a more irregular trend and more visible coils in N. brevipes). (Fig. 6E–G cf. Fig. 5E–G). Female of N. terrestris can be separated from female of N. silvicola by the more lobated scapus (Sc) with rounder lateral margins and straight internal ducts (vs more squared lateral margins and strongly bent internal ducts in N. silvicola) (Figs 6E–G, 7H cf. Figs 8E–G, 10D).

Description of male

(one of the topotypes). Habitus as in Fig. 6H. Total length 2.54. Prosoma 1.22 long, 1.18 wide. Carapace rounded, uniformly yellowish with borders and central area slightly darker. Cervical groove and fovea distinct. Eyes well developed. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.06, ALE = 0.09, PME = 0.09, PLE = 0.09, AMEALE = 0.06, ALEPLE = 0.01. Chelicerae, labium, maxillae, and sternum of the same color as carapace. Legs yellowish with darker annulation on femur, patella, and tibia. Legs measurements as follows: I 7.07 (2.03, 0.47, 1.99, 1.77, 0.81), II 5.56 (1.64, 0.47, 1.41, 1.31, 0.73), III 4.55 (1.39, 0.41, 1.09, 1.07, 0.59), IV 6.12 (1.89, 0.47, 1.61, 1.48, 0.67). Opisthosoma greyish with large black marks on dorsal and lateral sides.

Male palp as in Figs 6A–D, 7E–G. Cymbium relatively short, covered with sparse setae, several thicker setae on distal-prolateral margin (Fig. 6D). Paracymbium with a single distal process (Di), two ventral processes (Ve-I–II), and a dorsal apophysis (Do): distal process (Di) thick, hook-like when observed laterally, with a sharp tip headed ventrally and retrolaterally; ventral process I (Ve-I) stocky and blunt, headed internally; ventral process II (Ve-II) long, headed internally; dorsal apophysis (Do) lobated, wide and flat (Figs 6A–D, 7E–G). Embolus (E) long and filiform, origin of embolus positioned ~ 6:00 o’clock on radix (Rx). Radical apophysis (Ra) strongly sclerotized, triangular, ending with a rounded tip. Conductor with 3 distinct processes (Cp, Cr, Cm) and a half-transparent distal lobe (Cl). Prolateral process of the conductor (Cp) flat, ribbon-like and headed counterclockwise, wrapped around embolus. Retrolateral process of conductor (Cr) wide and thick, curved inside. Median process of conductor (Cm) thick and strongly sclerotized, spine-like, ending sharp, with a ribbon-like lobe wrapped around its prolateral side. (Figs 6A–C, 7E, F).

Redescription of female

(one of the topotypes). Habitus as in Fig. 6I, 15B. Total length 2.95. Prosoma 1.55 long, 1.16 wide. Cephalic area as in Fig. 6J. Carapace piriform. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.06, ALE = 0.09, PME = 0.09, PLE = 0.09, AMEALE = 0.07, ALEPLE = 0.00. Coloration and other details as in male. Legs measurements as follows: I 7.85 (2.32, 0.61, 2.13, 1.91, 0.88), II 6.01 (1.79, 0.53, 1.52, 1.41, 0.76), III 4.72 (1.46, 0.44, 1.04, 1.11, 0.67), IV 6.65 (2.19, 0.53, 1.72, 1.47, 0.74). Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 6E–G, 7H. Scapus (Sc) short and stumpy, rectangular, laterally elongated, ~ 1.5–2.0× wider than long, ending with a flat or slightly curved posterior margin (Figs 6E, F, 7H). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, V shaped. Copulatory ducts (Cd) short, straight, and thick, strongly diverging from each other. Insemination ducts thin, coiled around the Cd. Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 2–2.5× their diameter (Fig. 6G).

Size variation

Male (based on 5 specimens): total length: 2.01–2.54, prosoma length: 1.05–1.25, prosoma width: 0.95–1.18. Female (based on 15 specimens): total length: 2.31–3.30, prosoma length: 1.03–1.45, prosoma width: 0.94–1.21.

Distribution

Japan (Hokkaido, central-eastern Honshu, western Honshu?), Russian Far East (Sakhalin and Kuril Is.), Korea? (Fig. 16A). The presence of this species in western Honshu and Korea needs confirmation. See also “remarks on misidentification” for additional notes on the distribution of N. terrestris.

Habitat and ecology

Nesticella terrestris is found in humid and shadowed habitats, including forest leaf litter, under rotten logs and stones, vegetated cliffs, screes, and caves, both limestone and lava caves. This species builds simple scaffold webs in empty spaces among leaf litter and in rock recesses.

Remarks on intraspecific variation

This species shows some degree of variation in size and in the shape of the epigyne, different individuals having a slightly wider or slightly narrower scapus. The posterior margin is usually straight but it might be also slightly concave or slightly convex depending by the individuals. Specimens from the Kansai area seem to have a general smaller size and a scapus proportionally narrower than those of other populations.

Remarks on misidentifications

Nesticella terrestris was originally described by Yaginuma (1970: p. 387, 390, 391, figs 3–5) on the basis of a female collected from the Tokyo area. The author misidentified the male describing a male of H. mogera as a paratype of N. terrestris (Yaginuma 1970: p. 387, 391, fig. 8). An additional male from Gifu was also wrongly identified as N. brevipes and illustrated but not described (Yaginuma 1970: p. 387, fig. 9). The other records reported in the same work are probably a mix of the three species (Yaginuma 1970: p. 392). Nesticella terrestris was subsequently synonymized with N. brevipes by Yaginuma himself (1972: p. 619–621) believing that the differences in the shape of male palp and epigyne were part of the intraspecific variability of the species. Both the morphological and molecular results illustrated in our study clearly show that N. terrestris and N. brevipes are in fact two distinct species. Based on these conclusions the resurrection of N. terrestris as a valid species is herein proposed. Accordingly, we describe and illustrate for the first time the male of N. terrestris based on specimens collected from the type locality of the species. Due to the synonymization of N. terrestris with N. brevipes the published records of these two species are currently mixed. In this study we considered only the records that we could directly confirm on the basis of published drawings or checked samples. Based on our material all records from central and eastern Honshu up to Hokkaido refer to N. terrestris, while N. brevipes can be found in the islands of Honshu, Kyushu, and part of the Kansai area. (Fig. 16A). Due to the lack of specimens from western Kansai and Chugoku areas we cannot confirm the presence of N. terrestris in western Honshu although it seems plausible. Specimens of N. brevipes from Kuril Is. (Marusik and Crawford 2006) were checked by us and confirmed as N. terrestris. The illustrated specimens of N. brevipes from Korea (e.g., Kim and Lee 2018, fig. 11a–c) show close similarities with the palp and epigyne of N. terrestris rather than N. brevipes and possibly refer to the this or another closely related species (cf. Figs 5A–G, 7A–D vs Figs 6A–G, 7E–H vs Kim and Lee 2018: fig. 11A–C). The presence of N. terrestris in Korea needs to be properly verified directly examining the specimens.

Figure 11. 

Nesticella occulta sp. nov. A habitus of female (holotype) B cephalic area of female, frontal view C female epigyne, ventral view D same, shape variation E vulva, dorsal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; Id – insemination duct; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (A, C); 0.2 mm (B, D, E).

Nesticella silvicola sp. nov.

Figs 8A–G, 10A–D, 16B (Japanese name: Yamako-horahimegumo ヤマコホラヒメグモ)

Material examined

Holotype: Japan: Kagoshima Pref., Yakushima Is.: Koseda, Nagamine, 29.Mar.2023, S. Konishi leg. (NSMT-Ar 25254).

Paratypes: Japan: Kagoshima Pref., Yakushima Is.: 1♀, Koseda, 190 m, broadleaf forest litter on a gentle slope, 30.38286°N, 130.62455°E, 24.Sep.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (RMUF); 2♀, Isso, 130 m, broadleaf forest litter bordering a sugi plantation near a river, 30.43615°N, 130.48129°E, 27.Sep.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (NSMT-Ar 25255); 1♀, Miyanoura, 15.July.1990, A. Tanikawa leg. (FBPC); 1♀, Miyanoura, 341 m, humid broadleaf forest litter in a humid valley near a creek, 30.39696°N, 130.55584°E, 27.Sep.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 1♀, Anbo, 224 m, broadleaf forest litter, 30.28375°N, 130.61619°E, 27.Sep.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 1♀ Jhonji-dake, 18.Feb.2023, S. Konishi leg. (NSMT-Ar 25256)

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Latin adjective silvicolus (= inhabiting woods, sylvan). It refers to the habitat of the species, living in the forests of Yakushima Is.

Diagnosis

This species is closely related to N. brevipes and N. terrestris. Male of N. silvicola sp. nov. can be distinguished from male of N. terrestris by the stockier distal process of paracymbium (Di), the sharper radical apophysis (Ra), and by the wider ventral process II of paracymbium (Ve-II), (vs sharper Di, rounder Ra, and thinner Ve-II in N. terrestris). (Figs 8A–D, 10A–C cf. Figs 6A–D, 7E–G). In addition, the origin of the embolus (E) from the radix is located in a different position in the two species (4:30 o’clock in N. silvicola vs 6:00 o’clock in N. terrestris) (Figs 8A, 10A cf. Figs 6A, 7). Male of the new species can be easily separated from male of N. brevipes by the single distal process of paracymbium (Di), a wider radical apophysis (Ra), and a thicker median process of conductor (Cm) (vs two Di, a slimmer Ra, and a thinner Cm in N. brevipes). (Figs 8A–D, 10A–C cf. Figs 5A–D, 7A–C).

Female of N. silvicola sp. nov. can be distinguished from female of the other Japanese congeners of the N. brevipes group, by the general shape of genitalia, having a short scapus (Sc) with a flat distal margin, more squared lateral margins and strongly bent internal ducts (vs a longer and lobated Sc with straight ducts in N. brevipes, a more lobated scapus with rounder distal margins and straight internal ducts in N. terrestris, or a narrower and more trapezoidal scapus in N. insulana sp. nov. (Figs 9E–G, 10F cf. Figs 5E–G, 6E–G, 7D, H, 8E–G, 10D). The smaller size further allows a quick separation of N. silvicola sp. nov. from N. terrestris (females 1.84–1.94 vs 2.31–3.30).

Description of male

(holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 8H. Total length: 1.91. Prosoma 0.97 long, 0.86 wide. Carapace rounded, yellowish with slightly darker margins and central area. Cervical groove and fovea distinct. Eyes well developed. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.04, ALE = 0.08, PME = 0.08, PLE = 0.08, AMEALE = 0.03, ALEPLE = 0.00. Chelicerae, labium, maxillae, and sternum of same color as carapace. Legs yellowish with slightly darker annulation on distal femur, tibia, and metatarsus. Legs measurements: I 5.63 (1.60, 0.43, 1.48, 1.48, 0.64), II 4.28 (1.25, 0.38, 1.05, 1.06, 0.54), III 3.91 (1.00, 0.31, 0.82, 0.81, 0.47), IV 4.58 (1.44, 0.41, 1.16, 1.13, 0.44). Opisthosoma greyish with couples of slightly darker marks on anterior and dorsal side gradually merging to each other toward the posterior side.

Palp as in Figs 8A–D, 10A–C. Cymbium relatively short, covered with sparse setae, some thicker setae on distal-prolateral margin (Fig. 8D). Paracymbium with a single distal process (Di), two ventral processes (Ve-I–II), and a dorsal apophysis (Do): distal process (Di) stumpy, headed ventrally and retrolaterally, hook-like when observed laterally; ventral process I (Ve-I) sharp and slim, headed internally; ventral process II (Ve-II) lobated, headed internally; dorsal apophysis (Do) lobated, wide and flat (Figs 8A–D, 10A–C).Embolus (E) long and filiform, origin of embolus positioned at ~ 4:30 o’clock on radix (Rx). Radical apophysis (Ra) strongly sclerotized, wide and stumpy, triangular, ending with a rounded tip. Conductor with 3 distinct processes (Cp, Cr, Cm) and a half-transparent distal lobe (Cl). Prolateral process of conductor (Cp) flat, ribbon-like and headed counterclockwise, wrapped around embolus. Retrolateral process of conductor (Cr) wide and thick, curved inside. Median process of conductor (Cm) thick and strongly sclerotized, spine-like, ending blunt, with a ribbon-like lobe wrapped around its prolateral side. (Figs 8A–C, 10A, B).

Description of female

(one of the paratypes). Habitus as in Fig. 8I. Total length: 1.87. Prosoma 0.88 long, 0.78 wide. Cephalic area as in Fig. 8J. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.04, ALE = 0.08, PME = 0.08, PLE = 0.08, AMEALE = 0.03, ALEPLE = 0.00. Coloration and other details as in male. Legs measurements: I 4.65 (1.33, 0.40, 1.21, 1.10, 0.61), II 3.68 (1.10, 0.37, 0.86, 0.82, 0.53), III 2.09 (0.89, 0.30, 0.62, 0.63, 0.46), IV 3.96 (1.22, 0.33, 1.02, 0.88, 0.53).

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 8E–G, 10D. Scapus (Sc) very short and wide, rectangular, ~ 2.5× wider than long, ending with a flat posterior margin slightly concave in the center (Figs 8E, F, 10D). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, shaped as 2 angled brackets pointing towards each other. Copulatory ducts (Cd), short and thick, bent in the central trait, proximal part of ducts heading slightly internally, distal part heading laterally before reaching spermathecae. Insemination ducts (Id) thin, coiled around copulatory ducts. Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 1.5× their diameter (Fig. 8G).

Size variation

(based on 5 females). Total length: 1.84–1.94, prosoma length: 0.86–0.99, prosoma width: 0.78–0.84.

Distribution

Known only from Yakushima Is. in western Japan (Fig. 16B).

Habitat and ecology

Nesticella silvicola sp. nov. inhabits the shadowed and humid broadleaf and mixed forests covering the mountain slopes in Yakushima Is. This species builds simple scaffold webs in the empty spaces and recesses between the leaf litter and under rotten logs.

Nesticella insulana sp. nov.

Figs 9A–J, 10E–H, 16B (Japanese name: donan-horahimegumo ドナンホラヒメグモ)

Material examined

Holotype: Japan: Okinawa Pref., Yonaguni-jima Is.: Mantabaru Forest Park (満田原森林公園), 54 m, humid forest litter in a narrow valley, 24.45652°N, 122.97692°E, 3.Mar.2021, K. Eguchi leg. (NSMT-Ar 25257).

Paratypes : 4♀, same locality and date as the holotype, K. Eguchi leg. (NSMT-Ar 25258); 5♀, same locality and date, 112 m, 24.45678°N, 122.97675°E, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC).

Other material examined

1♂ subad., same locality and date as the holotype, 115 m, humid forest litter, 24.45660°N, 122.97584°E, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 1♀ subad., 54 m, humid forest litter in a small valley near route 216, 24.44740°N, 122.96827°E, 04.Mar.2021, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC).

Etymology

The specific name is derived from the Latin adjective insulanus (= islander). It refers to the distribution of the species, limited to the island of Yonaguni-jima.

Diagnosis

The new species is closely related to Nesticella odonta (Chen, 1984) from Zhajinag Province, China. Male of the new species can be distinguished from male of N. odonta by the wider distal process I of paracymbium (Di-I), the smaller and blunter distal process II (Di-II), and by the more curved ventral process II (vs thinner and sharper Di-I, wider Di-II, and straighter Ve-II in N. odonta) (Figs 9A, B, D, 10E–G cf. Lin et al. 2016: figs 24A, B, D). Female of N. insulana sp. nov. can be separated from female of N. odonta by the narrower, longer, and more arrow-like scapus (Sc) of the epigyne (vs wider, more trapezoidal, and shorter scapus in N. odonta) (Figs 9E–G, 10H cf. Lin et al. 2016: fig. 25E–G). The general shape of genitalia in both male and female allows to easily discern N. insulana sp. nov. from all the other Japanese congeners of the N. brevipes group.

Description of male

(holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 9H. Total length 1.81. Prosoma 0.91 long, 0.83 wide. Carapace rounded, yellowish with darker areas around borders and central area. Cervical groove and fovea distinct. Eyes well developed. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.05, ALE = 0.08, PME = 0.08, PLE = 0.08, AMEALE = 0.04, ALEPLE = 0.01. Chelicerae, labium, maxillae, and sternum of same color as carapace. Legs yellowish often with dark annulations on femur, and tibia. Legs measurements as follows: I 5.98 (1.65, 0.43, 1.58, 1.59, 0.73), II 4.35 (1.25, 0.31, 1.13, 1.06, 0.60), III 3.33 (0.98, 0.36, 0.70, 0.76, 0.53), IV 4.67 (1.43, 0.33, 1.19, 1.04, 0.68). Opisthosoma greyish with large dark marks on dorsal and lateral sides.

Male palp as in Figs 9A–D, 10E–G. Cymbium relatively short, 4–6 thicker setae on distal-prolateral margin (Fig. 9D). Paracymbium with 2 distal processes (Di-I, II) and 2 flat, lobated ventral processes (Ve-I–II): distal process I (Di-I) wide and lobated, hook-like when observed laterally, with tip headed ventral-retrolaterally; distal process II (Di-II) short and blunt, headed frontally; ventral process I (Ve-I) shorter, headed anteriorly; ventral process II (Ve-II) long and curved, headed antero-retrolaterally (Figs 9A–D, 10E–I Embolus (E) long and filiform, origin of embolus positioned at ~ 4:00 o’clock on radix (Rx). Radical apophysis (Ra) strongly sclerotized, triangular, and sharp, ending with a pointed tip. Conductor with 3 distinct processes (Cp, Cr, Cm) and a half-transparent distal lobe (Cl). Prolateral process of conductor (Cp) flat, ribbon-like, headed counter-clockwise, wrapped around embolus. Retrolateral process of conductor (Cr) wide and thick, curved inside, bearing a small sclerotized apophysis (Ca). Median process of conductor (Cm) strongly sclerotized, thin, spine-like ribbon-like, with a ribbon-like lobe wrapped around its prolateral side. (Figs 9A–C, 10E, F).

Description of female

(one of the paratypes). Habitus as in Fig. 9I. Total length 2.05. Prosoma 0.91 long, 0.84 wide. Cephalic area as in Fig. 9J. Carapace piriform. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.05, ALE = 0.07, PME = 0.08, PLE = 0.08, AMEALE = 0.04, ALEPLE = 0.01. Coloration and other details as in male. Legs measurements as follows: I 5.45 (1.61, 0.45, 1.41, 1.33, 0.65), II 3.98 (1.19, 0.41, 0.93, 0.89, 0.56), III 3.04 (0.88, 0.34, 0.67, 0.64, 0.51), IV 4.29 (1.39, 0.40, 1.09, 0.92, 0.49).

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 9E–G, 10H. Scapus (Sc) short and stumpy, arrow-like, ~ 2× wider than long, with sloped borders and narrower, slightly rounded tip (Figs 9E, F, 10H). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, shaped as curly bracket. Copulatory ducts (Cd) thick, strongly bent in middle trait, curving first laterally and then anteriorly before reaching spermathecae. Insemination ducts thin, coiled around copulatory ducts. Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 1.5× their diameter (Fig. 9G).

Size variation

Female (based on 5 specimens): total length 1.90–2.57, prosoma length: 0.82–1.05, prosoma width: 0.78–0.93.

Distribution

Endemic to Yonaguni-jima Is., western Ryukyus. Known only from the type locality (Fig. 16B).

Habitat and ecology

Nesticella insulana sp. nov. inhabits the shadowed and humid forests covering the hills of the central-western area of Yonaguni-jima Island. This species builds simple scaffold webs in the empty spaces among the leaf litter accumulated in narrow valleys, under rotten wood and on vegetated cliffs. Despite several attempted surveys, this species was not collected in other parts of the island.

Nesticella quelpartensis group

Nesticella occulta sp. nov.

Figs 11A–E; 13F, 15D, 16B (Japanese name: kakure-horahimegumo カクレホラヒメグモ)

Material examined

Holotype: Japan: Okinawa Pref.: Ishigaki-jima Is.: Kabira, Kabirano-ana cave (川平の穴), long and superficial cave with many rocks, in the dark zone of the cave, 24.47384°N, 124.13416°E, 20.Sep.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (NSMT-Ar 25259). Paratypes: 1♀, same locality as the holotype, 1.Apr.2019, K. Uchida leg. (NSMT-Ar 25260); 1♀, same locality, 2.Jan.2022, K. Uchida leg. (RMUF); 2♀, same locality and date as the holotype, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC).

Other material examined

1♂subad., same locality as the holotype, 16.Oct.2020; 1♂subad., same locality, 2.Jan.2022; 1♂subad., same locality, 28.Mar.2022, all K. Uchida leg. (RMUF).

Etymology

The specific name derives from the Latin adjective occultus (= hidden, secret). It refers to the troglobitic lifestyle and rarity of the species, hidden in the deep recess of a single cave in Ishigaki-jima Is.

Diagnosis

This species closely related to N. kaohsiungensis Lin, Ballarin & Li, 2016 from Taiwan. The new species can be easily distinguished from N. kaohsiungensis by the strongly reduced eyes and the lack of pigmentation and pattern on the opisthosoma (vs eyes well-developed, clear pattern on the opisthosoma and pigmentation present in N. kaohsiungensis) (Fig. 11A, B cf. Lin et al. 2016: fig. 69A, C). In addition, the female of this species can be distinguished from the female of N. kaohsiungensis by the different shape of scapus, lacking a lobated tip (vs ending with a lobated tip in the latter species) (Figs 11C, D, 13F cf. Lin et al. 2016: fig. 69E, F).

Description

Female (holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 11A, 15D. Total length 2.48. Prosoma 1.08 long, 0.93 wide. Carapace piriform, uniformly pale yellowish. Cephalic area as in Fig. 11B. Eyes completely degenerated. Cervical groove and fovea indistinct. Chelicerae uniformly brownish. Labium, maxillae, and sternum pale yellowish as carapace. Legs uniformly pale yellowish. Legs measurements: I 6.36 (2.18, 0.47, 1.48, 1.46, 0.77), II 6.13 (1.97, 0.45, 1.60, 1.42, 0.69), III 4.36 (1.43, 0.38, 0.95, 0.90, 0.70), IV 6.02 (1.94, 0.46, 1.54, 1.32, 0.76). Opisthosoma uniformly greyish, covered by long, sparse hairs.

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 11C–E, 13F. Scapus (Sc) long and protruding, tongue-like, ~ 2× longer than wide, ending with a rounded tip (Figs 11C, D, 13F). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, V shaped. Copulatory ducts (Cd) short and straight, strongly diverging from each other (Figs 11C–E, 13F) distal trait coiled, reaching spermathecae with 1 coil. Insemination ducts (Id) thin, coiled around the copulatory ducts. Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 2.5× their diameter (Fig. 11E).

Male. Unknown.

Size variation

(based on 4 females) Total length: 1.75–2.48, prosoma length: 1.06–1.10, width: 0.92–0.94 wide.

Distribution

Ishigaki-jima Island. Known only from the type locality (Fig. 16B).

Habitat and ecology

Nesticella occulta sp. nov. lives in the dark zone of the type locality cave characterized by high and stable temperature and humidity (e.g., temp: 25.8 °C, hum: 94.4%) (Fig. 15H). It builds small and simple scaffold-webs among the crevices and empty spaces between the numerous rocks covering the floor of the cave and on the lower part of the cave walls. These spiders appear scattered inside the cave and rather infrequently, suggesting a relatively small population. The compete eyes degeneration, the lack of pigmentation and the presence of the species only in the deepest section of the cave suggest that N. occulta sp. nov. is a true troglobiont. These characteristics as well as the rarity of the species, inhabiting a single cave, make N. occulta sp. nov. a good target for species conservation.

Nesticella okinawaensis group

Nesticella okinawaensis (Yaginuma 1979)

Figs 12A–J, 13A–D, 15E, 16B (Japanese name: okinawa-horahimegumo オキナワホラヒメグモ)

Nesticus okinawaensis Yaginuma 1979: 275, pl. 6, figs 6–8 (♂♀): Yaginuma 1986: 55, fig. 31.7 (♂♀).

Howaia okinawaensis Lehtinen and Saaristo 1980: 59 (♂♀, transferred from Nesticus).

Nesticella okinawaensis Kamura and Irie 2009: 353, figs 111, 112 (♂♀).

Type locality

Japan, Okinawa honto Is., Kakinohana,Tamagusuku-son, Yaaji-gama Cave.

Material examined

Japan: Kagoshima Pref.: Amami-Ōshima Is.: 1♂, 1♀, Amami-shi, Naze, forest litter, 15.Mar.2020, R. Serita leg. (FBPC); Okinoerabu-jima Is.: 1♀, Murauchi Shindō cave (村内新洞), 4.May.2004, H. Tamura leg. (MNHAH); 1♀, China-cho, Ginsuido cave (銀水洞), 27.Apr.2004, H. Tamura leg. (MNHAH); Okinawa Pref.: Okinawa-honto Is.: 2♀, Kunigami-gun, Motobu-cho, Izumi, 216 m, forest litter along the road, 26.63968°N, 127.93916°E, 17.Nov.2020; 1♀, Kunigami-son, Yona, Yambaru Park, 185 m, humid forest litter, 26.74755°N, 128.22347°E, 25.Feb.2021; 1♂, 10♀, same locality, 132 m, 26.75168°N, 128.22227°E, 28.Feb.2021; 2♀, same locality, 206 m, 26.74536°N, 128.22545°E, 28.Feb.2021; 2♀, same locality, 55 m, 26.75803°N, 128.22167°E, 01.Mar.2021, all F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 1♂, 1♀, Ogimi-son, Okuni-rindo Pass, 7.Mar.2020, Y. Suzuki leg. (YSPC); Kume-jima Is.: 2♀, Shimajiri-gun, Maja, 95 m, litter in a broadleaf forest, 26.34819°N, 126.80254°E, 18.May.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC); 1♀, Uegusuku, 263 m, litter in a broadleaf forest, 26.37577°N, 126.76990°E, 18.May.2022, F. Ballarin leg. (FBPC).

Diagnosis

Male of Nesticella okinawaensis can be distinguished from male of other Japanese congeners by the short and stocky beak-like median process of conductor (Cm) with a long ventral process (vs a longer, smaller, or thinner Cm, with a smaller or lacking ventral process in other species), by the presence of a long, lobated distal apophysis on the retrolateral process of conductor (Ca) (vs small Ca in N. silvicola sp. nov. or lacking in other species), and by the shape of paracymbium having an elongated distal process I (Di-I) and a lobated and complex distal process II (Di-II) (vs a shorter Di-I, and a missing, simpler, smaller or thinner Di-II in other species) (Figs 12A–D, 13A–C cf. Figs 1A–D, 2A–D, 4A–C, E–G, 5A–D, 6A–D, 7A–C, E–G, 8A–D, 9A–D, 10A–C, E–G). Female of N. okinawaensis is easily distinguished from female of other Japanese species by the shape of the internal copulatory ducts (Cd), thin and convoluted (vs thicker and less convoluted Cd in other species) (Figs 12E–G, 13D cf. Figs 1E–G, 2E–G, 3D, E, 4D, H, 5E–G, 6E–G, 7D, H, 8E–G, 9E–G, 10D, H, 11C–E, 13E, F).

Figure 12. 

Nesticella okinawaensis A male palp, ventral view (specimen from Yambaru) B same, retrolateral view C same, ventro-prolateral view D same, dorsal view E female epigyne, ventral view (specimen from Yambaru) F same after dissection, shape variation (specimen from Amami-Ōshima Is.) G vulva, dorsal view (specimen from Yambaru) H habitus of male (specimen from Amami-Ōshima Is.) I habitus of female (specimen from Yambaru) J cephalic area of female, frontal view. Abbreviations: Cd – copulatory duct; Co – copulatory opening; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G, J); 0.5 mm (H, I).

Figure 13. 

Genitalia of Nesticella okinawaensis, Howaia subterranea sp. nov., and N. occulta sp. nov. A male palp of N. okinawaensis, ventral view B same, retrolateral view C detail or paracymbium, dorsal view D female epigyne, ventral view; E H. subterranea sp. nov., female epigyne, ventral view F N. occulta sp. nov. female epigyne, ventral view. Abbreviations: Ca – apophysis of the retrolateral process of conductor; Cl – lobe of conductor; Cm – median process of conductor; Co – copulatory opening; Cp – prolateral process of conductor; Cr – retrolateral process of conductor; Di I–II – distal processes I and II of paracymbium; E – embolus; P – paracymbium; Ra – radical apophysis; Rx – radix; S – spermatheca; Sc – scapus; Sd – sperm duct; St – subtegulum; Te – tegulum; Ve – ventral process of paracymbium. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Redescription of male

(from Yambaru Park, Okinawa-honto). Habitus as in Fig. 12H. Total length 1.89. Prosoma 1.02 long, 0.90 wide. Carapace rounded, yellowish with dark cephalic area, median stripe, and margins. Cervical groove and fovea distinct. Eyes well developed. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.04, ALE = 0.09, PME = 0.09, PLE = 0.09, AMEALE = 0.03, ALEPLE = 0.00. Chelicerae, labium, maxillae, and sternum of the same yellowish color as carapace. Legs yellowish with dark annulation on femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, and tarsus. Legs measurement: I 5.46 (1.51, 0.40, 1.41, 1.41, 0.53), II 4.68 (1.41, 0.38, 1.17, 1.16, 0.56), III 3.43 (1.07, 0.33, 0.77, 0.83, 0.43), IV 5.15 (1.57, 0.41, 1.39, 1.21, 0.57). Opisthosoma dark grey with whitish dorsal mark on dorsal-anterior side.

Male palp as in Figs 12A–D, 13A–C. Cymbium elongated, five or six robust setae on the distal and distal-prolateral margin (Fig. 12D). Paracymbium with 2 distal processes (Di-I–II) and 1 ventral process (Va). Distal process I (Di-I) long, laterally flattened, slightly bent internally, ending with a small lobated tip; distal process II (Di-II) wide, proximal part laterally flattened, headed frontally, distal part lobated, headed internally bearing 2 small spurs. Ventral process of paracymbium (Va) wide, flat, triangularly shaped. (Figs 12A, B, D, 13A, C). Embolus (E) long and filiform, origin of embolus positioned at ~ 4:30 o’clock on radix (Rx). Radical apophysis (Ra) strongly sclerotized, rectangularly shaped, flat, and stocky with granulated surface. Conductor with 3 distinct processes (Cp, Cr, Cm) and a half-transparent distal lobe (Cl). Prolateral process (Cp) long and flat, ribbon-like, headed counterclockwise, wrapped around embolus. Retrolateral process (Cr) wide and thick, curved internally, distally bearing a long, lobated apophysis (Ca) and a flat, triangular outgrowth in the central part. Median process of conductor (Cm) beak-like, short and stocky, strongly sclerotized, with a long, strongly sclerotized ventral process (Figs 12A–C, 13A, B).

Redescription of female

(from Yambaru Park, Okinawa-honto). Habitus as in Figs 12I, 15E. Total length 1.84. Prosoma 0.87 long, 0.72 wide. Carapace piriform. Cephalic area as in Fig. 12J. Eyes well-developed. Eyes measurements: AME = 0.03, ALE = 0.08, PME = 0.08, PLE = 0.08, AMEALE = 0.03, ALEPLE = 0.00. Legs measurements: I 6.13 (1.51, 0.41, 1.36, 1.28, 0.57), II 3.66 (1.09, 0.36, 0.85, 0.83, 0.53), III 2.58 (0.70, 0.31, 0.56, 0.55, 0.46), IV 4.26 (1.33, 0.40, 1.04, 0.98, 0.51). Coloration and other details as in male.

Epigyne and vulva as in Figs 12E–G, 13D. Scapus (Sc) short, rectangular, elongated laterally, ~ 2× wider than long, bearing a flat posterior margin (Figs 12E, F, 13D). Copulatory opening (Co) at the inner-lateral sides of scapus. Internal ducts slightly visible through the transparent tegument, shaped as 2 inverted round brackets. Copulatory ducts (Cd), thin, coiled, reaching the spermathecae after 2 coils. Insemination ducts (Id) thin. Spermathecae (S) small and rounded, separated from each other by ~ 2.5× their diameter (Fig. 12G).

Size variation

Male (based on 3 males) Total length: 1.85–1.89, prosoma length: 1.01–1.02, width: 0.88–0.90. Female (based on 8 females) Total length: 1.68–2.07, prosoma length: 0.88–0.92, width: 0.79–0.81.

Distribution

Nesticella okinawaensis is distributed in the islands forming the Central Ryukyu arc (Fig. 16B). The new records for Amami-Ōshima and Okinoerabu-jima islands herein reported extend the known distribution of this species ~ 200 km to the North-East. Currently, N. okinawaensis is recorded from the islands of Amami-Ōshima, Okinoerabu-jima, Okinawa-honto, and Kume-jima (Yaginuma 1979; Tanikawa and Sasaki 1999; and this work) but its presence in other minor islands of the Central Ryukyu is also probable.

Habitat and ecology

Nesticella okinawaensis dwells in humid and shadowed habitats such as caves, narrow valleys, and vegetated cliffs. This species builds simple scaffold webs in empty spaces in the leaf litter or under logs and superficial rocks, as well as in recesses of the walls and floor of caves, usually in the twilight zone.

Remarks on intraspecific variation

The general coloration and the dorsal pattern of the opisthosoma appear rather variable in N. okinawaensis, changing among populations living in different areas or different islands or even single individuals. Populations living in the northern area of Okinawa-honto Is. often show a darker pattern, with less clear marks often reduced to a single whitish spot on the dorsal-anterior side (Figs 12I, 15E); populations from Kume-jima Is. often have a whitish continuous stripe along the median line of the opisthosoma, while populations from Amami-Ōshima Is. usually have a general lighter pattern with numerous larger light marks partially fused to each other (Fig. 12H). The shape of scapus also shows minor variability among specimens from different islands with the samples from Kume-jima Is. and Okinoerabu-jima Is. generally having a slightly narrower scapus. A high degree of genetic variation is also observed between population distributed in different islands (e.g., Amami Is.-Kumejima Is. = 7.3–7.8%; Amami Is.-Okinawa Is. = 7.5%; Kumejima Is.-Okinawa Is. = 5.6–6.7%).

Remarks on systematic

Nesticella okinawaensis was provisionally included in the N. brevipes group by Lin et al. (2016) on the basis of published drawings only. Our molecular analysis, and a detailed morphological comparison of this species with the type material of N. brevipes, suggest that N. okinawaensis is in fact far related to the N. brevipes group and it belongs to a distinct clade. In addition, this species seems to have a basal position within the genus Nesticella (Fig. 14). Nevertheless, the phylogeny reconstructed in this work is based on a single gene fragment and includes only a part of the known Nesticella species. Preliminary analysis including more species (e.g., species of the N. phami group) seem to confirm the monophyly of N. okinawaensis although the support of the main nodes decreases substantially. Wider and more detailed molecular and morphological studies including a larger number of species and gene fragments are necessary to confirm the phylogenetic position of N. okinawaensis within Nesticella.

Figure 14. 

Combined phylogenetic tree based on COI gene fragment reconstructed using maximum likelihood (ML) on RAxML and Bayesian inference (BI) on MrBayes. Support at each node denotes the ML bootstrap value (BV) and BI posterior probability (PP). Nodes highly supported by at least one method (BV ≥ 70 or PP ≥ 0.95) are highlighted by a black dot. Branch lengths were scaled concerning the number of substitutions per site. Each species corresponding to monophyletic clades are represented with different branch colors, species from Japan are highlighted with a colored background: red = H. mogera, azure = H. alba sp. nov., yellow = N. occulta sp. nov., violet = N. insulana sp. nov., light green = N. silvicola sp. nov., blue = N. brevipes, orange = N. terrestris, dark green = N. okinawaensis. The tree is rooted using the species Wraios longiembolus. The right lines denote the results of the species delimitation analysis based on morphological (MO) and molecular (ASAP, mPTP, and bPTP) data.

Figure 15. 

Nesticella and Howaia species in life and their natural habitats A female of H. mogera B female of N. terrestris C female of H. alba sp. nov. D female of N. occulta sp. nov. E female of N. okinawaensis F example of the epigean habitat of Nesticella species in the Ryukyus G habitat of H. alba sp nov. (dark zone of Tsuzupisuki-abu cave) H habitat of N. occulta sp. nov. (dark zone of Kabirano-ana cave) (all photos by F. Ballarin).

Figure 16. 

Distribution of Nesticella and Howaia species in mainland Japan and Ryukyu Archipelago A distribution of N. brevipes and N. terrestris in mainland Japan and neighboring countries B distribution of Nesticella and Howaia species endemic to the Ryukyu Archipelago C distribution of H. mogera in mainland Japan and neighboring countries D distribution of H. mogera in the Ryukyu Archipelago and neighboring countries. Colored squares refer to the type localities of the species, colored dots indicate the locations of specimens whose morphology has been checked during this study, dashed areas refer to the generally known distribution of the species, question marks refer to unclear distributions (see “remarks on misidentifications” of N. brevipes and N. terrestris).

Figure 17. 

Size comparison between Nesticella brevipes and N. terrestris A visual comparison of adult females of Nesticella brevipes (left) and N. terrestris (right) B Scatterplot of the Tibia I / carapace lengths ratio in females of N. brevipes (blue circle) and N. terrestris (orange circles). Measurements are reported in millimeters. Scale bar: 1 mm (A).

Acknowledgements

The authors are particularly thankful to all the numerous people who kindly helped with the field collections or provided part of the material used in this study, in particular: Mamoru Araki, Namiki Kikuchi, Joe Kutsukake, Yuri M. Marusik, Ryo Miyata, Toshimichi Nagai, Ryohei Serita, Yuya Suzuki, Sho Tsukamoto, and Takeshi Yamasaki. Among them we are particularly indebted to Akio Tanikawa (Tokyo, Japan) for kindly providing numerous samples and helping arranging field trips and contacts with collaborators. We thank Dr. Atsushi Takashima (Yona Field, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan), Ms. Nana Yokoyama (Yanbaru Nature Conservation Officer Office, Ministry of the Environment, Japan), Dr. Takeshi Sasaki (Ryukyu University Museum Fujukan, Okinawa, Japan), Mr. Haruo Kugai (Miyakojima City Board of Education, Miyakojima, Japan), the Namihira Community Center's staff (Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan), the Fujinomiya City Hall's staff (Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan), and all the other local authorities who kindly provided permissions and assistance during the field collections. We are equally grateful to Koji Uchida (Okinawa, Japan), Sukenobu Konishi (Yakushima, Japan), and Hisao Tamura (Okinawa, Japan) for providing samples of N. occulta, N. silvicola, and H. subterranea, respectively; their support has been essential to the discovery of these new species. Many thanks to Ken-ichi Okumura (Tokyo, Japan) and Rikio Matsumoto (Osaka, Japan) for allowing the study of the specimens respectively preserved in the collections of the National Museum of Nature and Science of Tokyo and the Osaka Museum of Natural History. We also thank Ingi Agnarsson, Akio Tanikawa, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and advice which helped to improve the paper.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study has been supported by the following funds: the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowships, Japan (JSPS KAKENHI, n° 18F18380, Leader: F. Ballarin, FY2018–FY2020), the Fund for the Promotion of Joint International Research (Fostering Joint International Research (B)) (JSPS KAKENHI, n° 22KK0087, Leader: K. Eguchi, FY2022–2025), the Tokyo Metropolitan University Fund for TMU Strategic Research (Leader: Prof. Noriaki Murakami, FY2020–FY2022), and the Asahi Glass Foundation (Leader: K. Eguchi, FY2017–FY2022).

Author contributions

All authors have contributed equally.

Author ORCIDs

Francesco Ballarin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-2519

Katsuyuki Eguchi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-1295

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Ballarin F (2020) Domitius culsu sp. nov. (Araneae, Nesticidae), a new troglobiont spider from Italy with notes on Italian nesticids of the genus Domitius Ribera, 2018. Journal of Caves and Karst Studies 82(2): 82–94. https://doi.org/10.4311/2019LSC0103
  • Ballarin F, Eguchi K (2022) Taxonomic notes on leptonetid spiders from the Ryukyu Archipelago with the description of two new species and the first record of the genus Longileptoneta from Japan (Araneae: Leptonetidae). Zootaxa 5213(4): 371–387. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5213.4.3
  • Ballarin F, Li SQ (2015) Three new genera of the family Nesticidae (Arachnida: Araneae) from Tibet and Yunnan, China. Zoological Systematics 40(2): 179–190. https://doi.org/10.11865/zs.20150203
  • Ballarin F, Li SQ (2018) Diversification in tropics and subtropics following the mid‐Miocene climate change: A case study of the spider genus Nesticella. Global Change Biology 24(2): 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13958
  • Bielak-Bielecki P, Rozwalka R (2011) Nesticella mogera (Yaginuma, 1972) (Araneae: Nesticidae) in Poland. Zeszyty Naukowe. Acta Biologica, Uniwersytet Szczeciński 18: 137–141.
  • Chikuni Y (1989) Pictorial encyclopedia of spiders in Japan. Kaisei-sha Publishing Co., Tokyo, 310 pp. [In Japanese]
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8): 772–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299.
  • Gertsch WJ (1984) The spider family Nesticidae (Araneae) in North America, Central America, and the West Indies. Bulletin of the Texas Memorial Museum 31: 1–91.
  • Gong MX, Zhu CD (1982) [Description of Nesticus mogera Yaginuma (Araneae: Nesticidae) from China]. Journal of the Bethune Medical University 8: 62. [In Chinese]
  • Grall E, Jäger P (2016) Four new species of the spider genus Nesticella Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980 from Laos, Thailand and Myanmar and the first description of the male of Nesticella yui Wunderlich & Song, 1995 with a proposed new diagnostic character for the family Nesticidae Simon, 1894 (Arachnida, Araneae). Zootaxa 4085(2): 248–264. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4085.2.5
  • Hedin MC, Maddison WP (2001) A combined molecular approach to phylogeny of the jumping spider subfamily Dendryphantinae (Araneae: Salticidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18(3): 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.2000.0883
  • Hedin M, Milne MA (2023) New species in old mountains: Integrative taxonomy reveals ten new species and extensive short-range endemism in Nesticus spiders (Araneae, Nesticidae) from the southern Appalachian Mountains. ZooKeys 1145: 1–130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1145.96724
  • Hubert M (1973) Araignées du Népal, II. Nesticus nepalensis n. sp. (Arachnida: Nesticidae). Senckenbergiana Biologica 54: 165–169.
  • Hupało K, Copilaș‐Ciocianu D, Leese F, Weiss M (2022) Morphology, nuclear SNPs and mate selection reveal that COI barcoding overestimates species diversity in a Mediterranean freshwater amphipod by an order of magnitude. Cladistics 39(2): 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12520 [Early view]
  • Irie T (1981) Cave spiders of Kyushu (IV). Heptathela 2: 30–37. [In Japanese]
  • Kamura T, Irie T (2009) Nesticidae. In: Ono H (Ed.) The spiders of Japan with keys to the families and genera and illustrations of the species. Tokai University Press, Kanagawa, 345–355. [In Japanese]
  • Kapli P, Lutteropp S, Zhang J, Kobert K, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A, Flouri T (2017) Multi-rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 33(11): 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025
  • Kim ST, Lee SY (2018) Spiders IV. Arthropoda: Arachnida: Araneae: Atypidae, Scytodidae, Nesticidae, Anapidae, Ctenidae, Hahniidae, Miturgidae, Liocranidae, Trochanteriidae. Invertebrate Fauna of Korea 21(45): 1–79.
  • Kim JP, Yoo YS, Lee YB (1999) A newly recorded species of the genus Nesticella (Aranea, Nesticidae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology 15: 183–187.
  • Komatsu T (1940) On five species of spiders found in the Ryûgadô Cave, Tosa province. Acta Arachnologica 5(3): 186–195. https://doi.org/10.2476/asjaa.5.186 [In Japanese]
  • Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A (2019) RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 35(21): 4453–4455. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6): 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • Lehtinen PT, Saaristo MI (1980) Spiders of the Oriental-Australian region. II. Nesticidae. Annales Zoologici Fennici 17: 47–66.
  • Lin YC, Ballarin F, Li SQ (2016) A survey of the spider family Nesticidae (Arachnida, Araneae) in Asia and Madagascar, with the description of forty-three new species. ZooKeys 627: 1–168. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.627.8629
  • Marusik YM, Crawford RL (2006) Spiders (Aranei) of Moneron Island. In: Flora and Fauna of Moneron Island. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, 171–195.
  • Marusik YM, Guseinov E (2003) Spiders (Arachnida: Aranei) of Azerbaijan. 1. New family and genus records. Arthropoda Selecta 12(1): 29–46.
  • Myers N, Russell AM, Cristina GM, Gustavo DF, Jennifer K (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772): 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
  • Namkung J (2002) The spiders of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co., Seoul, 648 pp.
  • Paik KY (1996) A newly record species of the genus Nesticus Thorell, 1869 (Araneae: Nesticidae) from Korea. Korean Arachnology 12(2): 71–75.
  • Pantini P, Bonelli D, Bonacci T (2020) I ragni epigei (Arachnida, Araneae) di un ambiente litoraneo della Calabria. Rivista del Museo Civico di Scienze Naturali “Enrico Caffi”, Bergamo 32: 25–32.
  • Pavlek M, Ribera C (2017) Kryptonesticus deelemanae gen. et sp. nov. (Araneae, Nesticidae), with notes on the Mediterranean cave species. European Journal of Taxonomy 262(262): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.262
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5): 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Ramírez MJ, Magalhaes ILF, Pizarro-Araya J, Ballarin F, Marusik YM, Eskov KY (2022) A new species of the spider genus Tekellina Levi, 1957 from Chile, with a broadened definition of the family Synotaxidae (Arachnida, Araneae). Zoologischer Anzeiger 301: 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2022.08.005
  • Ribera C, Dimitrov D (2023) A molecular phylogeny of the European nesticid spiders (Nesticidae, Araneae): Implications for their systematics and biogeography. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 180: 107685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107685
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Sherwood D, Jocqué R, Henrard A, Fowler L (2023) The scaffold web spider Nesticus helenensis Hubert, 1977, a junior synonym of Howaia mogera (Yaginuma, 1972) rest. comb., with revalidation of Howaia Lehtinen & Saaristo, 1980 (Araneae: Nesticidae). Zootaxa 5306(3): 397–400. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5306.3.8
  • Shinkai A, Ando A, Tanikawa A, Ikeda H, Kuwata T (2022) Japanese Spiders ver.2022. Self-published CD by the authors. [In Japanese] [accessed on September 2022]
  • Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P (1994) Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87(6): 651–701. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/87.6.651
  • Song DX, Zhu MS, Chen J (1999) The spiders of China. Hebei Science and Technology Publishing House, Shijiazhuang, 640 pp.
  • Suzuki Y, Ballarin F (2020) Nesticus kosodensis Yaginuma, 1972 bona species. Molecular and morphological separation from N. latiscapus Yaginuma, 1972 with notes on cave scaffold-web spiders subspecies in Japan (Araneae, Nesticidae). Subterranean Biology 35: 79–96. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.35.53933
  • Suzuki Y, Hiramatsu T, Tatsuta H (2022) Two new species and a new genus of ray spiders (Araneae, Theridiosomatidae) from the Ryukyu Islands, southwest Japan, with notes on their natural history. ZooKeys 1109: 76–101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1109.83807
  • Tanikawa A, Sasaki T (1999) A check list of spiders in Okinawa Prefecture, Japan. Kishidaia 76: 61–101. [In Japanese]
  • Yaginuma T (1970) Two new species of small nesticid spiders of Japan. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science Tokyo 13: 385–394.
  • Yaginuma T (1972) Revision of the short-legged nesticid spiders of Japan. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science Tokyo 15: 619–622.
  • Yaginuma T (1977) Some problems in cave spiders of Japan (including a description of a new species). Faculty of Letters Revue. Otemon Gakuin University 11: 305–316.
  • Yaginuma T (1979) A study of the Japanese species of nesticid spiders. Faculty of Letters Revue. Otemon Gakuin University 13: 255–287.
  • Yaginuma T (1986) Spiders of Japan in color (new ed.). Hoikusha Publishing Co., Osaka, 305 pp.[, 64 pls.] [In Japanese]
  • Yamaguchi T, Yaginuma T (1971) The fauna of the insular lava caves in West Japan VIII. Araneae (Part 2). Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science Tokyo 14: 171–180.
  • Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A (2013) A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 29(22): 2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499
  • Zhu MS, Zhang BS (2011) Spider Fauna of Henan: Arachnida: Araneae. Science Press, Beijing, 558 pp.
  • Zigler KS, Milne MA (2022) Two new Nesticus Thorell, 1869 (Araneae: Nesticidae) from caves in northwest Georgia, USA. The Journal of Arachnology 50(3): 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1636/JoA-S-21-035

1 For the complete list of references see the World Spider Catalog 2023.
login to comment