Research Article |
Corresponding author: Carlos Perafán ( caperafanl@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Chris Hamilton
© 2023 Mariana Echeverri, Sebastián Gómez Torres, Nicolás Pinel, Carlos Perafán.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Echeverri M, Gómez Torres S, Pinel N, Perafán C (2023) Four new species of mygalomorph spiders (Araneae, Halonoproctidae and Theraphosidae) from the Colombian Pacific region (Bahía Solano, Chocó). ZooKeys 1166: 49-90. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1166.101069
|
The Colombian Pacific coast is an amazing natural region, immersed in one of the most unknown biodiversity hotspots in the world. An expedition carried out in the north of this area, at the Jardín Botánico del Pacífico (JBP) in Bahía Solano, Chocó, focused on studying the diversity of the mygalomorph spider fauna, allowed us to discover four new species included in the families Halonoproctidae and Theraphosidae. The trapdoor species Ummidia solana sp. nov., and the theraphosids species Euthycaelus cunampia sp. nov. (Schismatothelinae), Melloina pacifica sp. nov. (Glabropelmatinae), and Neischnocolus mecana sp. nov. (Theraphosinae) are illustrated, diagnosed, and described in detail. Photographs of somatic features and copulatory organs and a distribution map are provided. Morphological, taxonomical, and biogeographical aspects are discussed for each species. All these taxonomic novelties represent the first records of these genera for the region, expanding the range of geographic distribution of each of them. This work constitutes the first effort focused on characterizing the community of Mygalomorphae species in the Chocó Biogeographic Region.
Chocó Biogeographic Region, Euthycaelus, Mecana, Melloina, Neischnocolus, tarantula, trapdoor spider, Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena hotspot, Ummidia
The enigmatic groups of Mygalomorphae spiders, known in a broad sense as tarantulas in America, constitute approximately 6% of the total number of spider species described (
While a few groups of trapdoor spiders can perform short-range ballooning (
The Colombian Pacific region is a fascinating area for its biological characteristics because it’s located in the hearth of the Chocó Biogeographic Region. This area constitutes a global biodiversity hotspot, the ninth most biodiverse in the world and one of the most unknown (
Despite the great potential that Colombia has to become a worldwide reference on Mygalomorphae diversity, due to its geographical location and its enormous variety of ecosystems, only 34 of the 50 species described for the country are known by both sexes, and most of them are distributed in the Andean region (
In this first approach to the knowledge of the Mygalomorphae fauna from the rainforest of the Colombian Pacific, we illustrate, describe, and discuss one species from the Halonoproctidae trapdoor spiders, Ummidia solana sp. nov., and three Theraphosidae tarantulas included in different subfamilies, as follow: Euthycaelus cunampia sp. nov. (Schismatothelinae), Neischnocolus mecana sp. nov. (Theraphosinae), and Melloina pacifica sp. nov (Glabropelmatinae). All these new taxonomic records represent first reports of these genera for the region, which extends the range of geographical distribution of each of them. The results of this work constitute a contribution to the knowledge of the biological diversity of one of the areas with the greatest specific richness of species and endemism in Colombia.
All specimens herein described were collected under Universidad’s EAFIT General Collection Permit (Resolution 1566 of 24 December 2013; amended via Resolution 02493 of 31 December 2018); and deposited in the Arachnological Collection (Order Araneae) of the Instituto de Ciencias Naturales (ICN), Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia, preserved in 75% ethanol. The specimens were collected during a biological expedition carried out in the Jardín Botánico del Pacífico (JBP), located in Bahía Solano, Chocó, Colombia (Fig.
Primary reproductive structures, palpal bulb and spermathecae, were removed for their description and photographic documentation. All photographs and descriptions of the copulatory bulb correspond to the left palp. Spermathecae were cleaned and cleared with lactic acid (85%) by immersion in a test tube and subjecting them to increased heat for short time intervals. Setae of the male tibia I and palpal tibia were removed in order to illustrate the tibial apophysis and nodules, respectively. Specimens and the structures removed were examined under a LEICA M205C stereo microscope. Photographs were taken with a stereo microscope ZEISS Stereo Discovery V12, then stacked with Helicon Focus 8.2.0 Mac OS (Helicon Soft Ltd. 2019) and processed with Adobe Photoshop CC 2022 (Adobe Inc. 2022).
All measurements are given in millimeters (mm). The total length given does not include the chelicerae or spinnerets. Eye sizes were measured as the maximum diameter in either a dorsal or frontal view and were taken with a digital micrometer. Body measurements were taken with a digital micrometer or a vernier caliper. The length and width of carapace, eye tubercle, labium and sternum are the maximum values obtained. Leg and palp measurements were taken in dorsal view along the central axis of the right-side limbs and were taken with a vernier caliper.
The general descriptive format follows
Abbreviations used in the text and figures are as follows:
A apical keel of palpal bulb;
ALE anterior lateral eyes;
AME anterior median eyes;
ap apical;
d dorsal side;
ITC inferior tarsal claw;
p prolateral side;
PB prolateral branch of tibial apophysis;
PI prolateral inferior keel of palpal bulb;
PLE posterior lateral eyes;
PME posterior median eyes;
PMS posterior median spinnerets;
PLS posterior lateral spinnerets;
PS prolateral superior keel of palpal bulb;
R retrolateral keel of palpal bulb;
RB retrolateral branch of tibial apophysis;
SLS spine like setae;
SR seminal receptacles;
STC superior tarsal claw;
v ventral side.
Genus Ummidia Thorell, 1875
Holotype ♂: Colombia, Chocó, Bahía Solano, Jardín Botánico del Pacífico, 6.38, -77.40, elevation 60 m a.s.l., 10–25 February 2022, M. Echeverri, S. Gómez Torres and C. Perafán leg. (ICN 12356). Paratype ♀: same data as holotype, except elevation 132 m a.s.l. (ICN 12357).
The specific epithet solana is a noun in feminine refers to the municipality of Bahía Solano, one of the most beautiful places in the Colombian Pacific coast, recognized for having large and desolate beaches and landscapes of abundant vegetation. It is immersed in one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots. It is also said that the word “solano” means “wind from where the sun rises”.
Ummidia solana sp. nov. can be differentiated from all geographically proximate species (see
Known only from the type locality (Figs
Male (holotype) (Figs
Clypeus: length 0.38, without bristles; protracted onto membranous connection between carapace and chelicerae. Eye group (Fig.
Legs pattern: IV>I>II>III. Lengths of legs and palpal segments on Table
Ummidia solana sp. nov. Male holotype. Lengths of legs and palpal segments.
I | II | III | IV | Palp | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 6.44 | 4.97 | 4.43 | 5.92 | 4.09 |
Patella | 3.15 | 2.71 | 2.93 | 2.94 | 2.01 |
Tibia | 4.13 | 3.11 | 2.28 | 3.65 | 3.13 |
Metatarsus | 3.24 | 2.65 | 2.63 | 4.18 | - |
Tarsus | 1.31 | 1.08 | 1.62 | 1.75 | 0.59 |
Total | 18.27 | 14.52 | 13.89 | 18.44 | 9.82 |
Legs I (Fig.
Palp (Fig.
Coloration. Living spider: carapace black, rugose; ocular area black, PME yellow; chelicerae basal segment, palp, and legs black; tarsi reddish brown; abdomen gray, with cream color spotted pattern. In alcohol: carapace black; sternum brown; labium and maxillae reddish brown; legs dark brown; abdomen gray with spotted pattern; genital area, book lung openings and spinnerets light yellow.
Female (paratype) (Figs
Clypeus: length 0.35, with few bristles; protracted onto membranous connection between carapace and chelicerae. Eye group (Fig.
Legs pattern: IV>I>III>II. Lengths of legs and palpal segments on Table
Ummidia solana sp. nov. Female paratype. Lengths of legs and palpal segments.
I | II | III | IV | Palp | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 5.25 | 4.77 | 4.59 | 5.96 | 4.70 |
Patella | 3.57 | 3.36 | 3.07 | 3.46 | 3.24 |
Tibia | 3.39 | 2.90 | 2.56 | 3.76 | 3.53 |
Metatarsus | 2.63 | 2.34 | 2.45 | 3.79 | - |
Tarsus | 1.21 | 1.70 | 2.51 | 2.32 | 2.67 |
Total | 16.05 | 15.07 | 15.18 | 19.29 | 14.14 |
STC with single large and acute proximal tooth, ITC very short and steeply curved in all tarsi. Claw tufts: absent. Pseudoscopulae: absent in all legs. Tarsal trichobothria: Palpal tarsus with ca. 13 clavate trichobothria on medial edge and four filiform trichobothria on distal edge; tarsi I–IV with 1–3 clavate trichobothria and few filiform trichobothria. All femora with wide membranous slits on distal side. All legs and palp with many spiniform setae (Fig.
Legs I (Fig.
Leg III (Fig.
Leg IV. Trochanter and femur: unmodified. Patella: with a wide dorsal central row, prolateral fields of short spines, rise in size toward distal side. Tibia: swollen, dorsal and prolateral with a row of short and fine spines along full length of segment. Metatarsus and tarsus: prodorsal and retrodorsal with SLS along full length of segment, and with ventral long spines covering the totality of the tarsus and 80% of the metatarsus. Retrolateral face of tarsus with defined comb of long spinules over length of the segment (Fig.
Spermathecae (Fig.
Coloration. Living spider: carapace black, smooth, shiny, darker than male; ocular area black, PME yellow; chelicerae basal segment, palp, and legs black; abdomen dark gray, with cream color spotted pattern. In alcohol: carapace dark brown; legs and palp brown with darker overtones, mainly in femora and in the distal segments of all legs; sternum, labium, and maxillae brown; abdomen greyish brown with spotted pattern; genital area, book lung openings, and spinnerets light yellow.
Ummidia solana sp. nov. is the third species described from the genus and the family Halonoproctidae for Colombia.
Subfamily Glabropelmatinae
Genus Melloina Brignoli, 1985
Holotype ♂: Colombia, Chocó, Bahía Solano, Jardín Botánico del Pacífico, 6.38, -77.40, 45 m a.s.l., 10–25 February 2022, M. Echeverri, S. Gómez Torres and C. Perafán leg. (ICN 12358). Paratypes, same data as holotype except elevation, 99–145 m a.s.l.: ♀ (ICN 12359), ♂ (ICN 12360), ♂ (ICN 12361), ♀ (ICN 12362), ♂ (ICN 12363).
The specific epithet pacifica is a noun in feminine refers to the Colombian Pacific region, where the species is distributed.
Male of Melloina pacifica sp. nov. can be distinguished from other Melloina species by the relatively longer embolus (Fig.
Known only from the type locality (Figs
Male (holotype) (Figs
Clypeus: absent. Ocular tubercle (Fig.
Legs pattern: IV>I>II>III. Lengths of legs and palpal segments on Table
Melloina pacifica sp. nov. Male holotype. Lengths of legs and palpal segments.
I | II | III | IV | Palp | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 8.07 | 6.96 | 6.15 | 9.36 | 3.99 |
Patella | 4.37 | 3.59 | 2.87 | 3.53 | 2.42 |
Tibia | 7.31 | 5.44 | 4.37 | 7.43 | 3.46 |
Metatarsus | 6.39 | 5.48 | 5.77 | 9.81 | - |
Tarsus | 6.80 | 3.63 | 3.35 | 4.26 | 1.37 |
Total | 32.94 | 25.1 | 22.51 | 34.39 | 11.24 |
Spination (proximal to distal). Femora: palp d 5-8-11, p 0-0-3, v 0-2-0, r 0-2-2; I d 6-4-10, p 0-0-3, v 3-4-10 (8 ap), r 0-0-5; II d 5-5-7, p 0-0-1, v 0-0-6 (5 ap), r 1-1-1; III d 5-5-4, p 3-2-2, v 1-3-10 (8 ap), r 1-2-3; IV d 5-2-4, p 0-0-1 ap, v 0-2-10 (8 ap), r 0-1-1. Patellae: palp d 9-7-8, p 0-1-4 ap, v 1-1-4 ap, r 2-3-2; I d 1-1-3, p 1-1-2, v 0-0-2 ap, r 1-1-2 ap; II d 3-2-5, p 1-2-5 (4 ap), v: 0-1-3 ap, r: 1-1-2; III d: 5-4-5, p: 2-2-2, v: 0-2-2 ap, r: 1-1-3 ap; IV d: 3-1-2, p: 0-1-2 ap, v 0-2-3 (2 ap), r 0-0-1 ap. Tibiae: palp d 2-5-5, p 4-2-4 (2 ap), v 5-6-7 (3 ap), r 2-3-8 (2 ap); I d 1-1-3, p 1-1-2, v 0-0-2 ap, r 1-1-2 ap; II d 2-1-1, p 3-2-3 (2 ap), v 4-4-4 (2 ap), r 2-2-0; III d 3-2-3, p 3-2-3 (1 ap), v 2-2-2 ap, r 3-3-3 ap; IV d 7-5-7, p 5-4-4 (1 ap), v 3-2-3 (2 ap), r 2-2-2 (1 ap). Metatarsi: I d 0, p 2-2-1 ap, v 6-4-6 (2 ap), r 1-1-1; II d 2-2-2, p 4-4-4 (1 ap), v 4-5-6 (3 ap), r 3-2-2 (1 ap); III d 4-4-3, p 2-2-2, v 4-4-5 (2 ap), r 2-3-3 (1 ap); IV d: 3-1-4, p: 2-2-2, v: 3-3-4 (2 ap), r: 3-2-2 (1 ap). Tarsi: cymbium p lobe 4, r lobe 10 (8 ap); I d 0, p 3-1-4 (1 ap), v 0, r 3-3-4 (1 ap); II d 1-1-1, p 3-3-4 (1 ap), v 0, r: 3-3-4 (1 ap); III d 3-2-3, p 3-3-4 (1 ap), v 0, r 3-3-4 (1 ap); IV d 3-4-3, p 2-3-3 (1 ap), v 2-1-2, r 2-3-3 (1 ap).
Palp (Fig.
Coloration. Living spider: carapace, palp, and legs reddish black; femora and tarsi red, distal femora, patellae, tibiae, and metatarsi black; abdomen dark (Fig.
Female (paratype - ICN 12359) (Figs
Clypeus: absent. Ocular tubercle (Fig.
Legs pattern: IV>I>II>III. Lengths of legs and palpal segments on Table
Melloina pacifica sp. nov. Female paratype. Lengths of legs and palpal segments.
I | II | III | IV | Palp | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 7.12 | 5.96 | 5.4 | 8.01 | 4.32 |
Patella | 4.41 | 3.63 | 2.82 | 3.56 | 2.7 |
Tibia | 6.17 | 4.54 | 3.82 | 6.84 | 3.1 |
Metatarsus | 4.96 | 4.15 | 4.52 | 7.75 | - |
Tarsus | 2.88 | 2.74 | 2.79 | 3.29 | 3.12 |
Total | 25.54 | 21.02 | 19.35 | 29.45 | 13.24 |
Spination (proximal to distal). Femora: palp d 2-2-4, p 0-0-1, v 12-9-8, r 0; I d 3-2-3, p 0, v 3-3-5, r 0; II d 1-0-1, p 0, v 4-3-3, r 0; III d 1-2-1, p 1-1-1, v 1-2-3, r 0; IV d 1-1-1, p 0, v 1-2-6, r 0. Patellae: palp d 3-2-3, p 1-1-3 ap, v 0-0-3 ap, r 0-1-2; I d 0, p 0-1-1, v 0-2-2 ap, r 1-1-0; II d 0, p 0, v 0-2-2 ap, r 0; III d 0-1-0, p 0-1-1, v 0-1-2, r 0; IV d 0, p 0, v 0-2-3 (2 ap), r 0. Tibiae: palp d 5-5-3, p 0-1-2, v 6-5-3 ap, r 2-2-2; I d 4-6-4, p 2-1-2, v 3-4-2 ap, r 1-1-1; II d 2-1-1, p 1-1-2, v 4-5-4 (2 ap), r 1-1-1; III d 4-5-5, p 2-2-2, v 3-4-4 (3 ap), r 0-1-1; IV d 2-2-2, p 3-2-1 ap, v 4-5-5 (1 ap), r 1-1-2 (1 ap). Metatarsi: I d 0, p 1-1-0, v 5-5-6 (2 ap), r 0; II d 0, p 1-1-3, v 5-3-5 (2 ap), r 1-2-2 (1 ap); III d 2-3-4, p 2-2-2 (1 ap), v 4-3-3 (1 ap), r 2-2-2; IV d 4-4-4, p 2-2-1, v 4-3-4 ap, r 2-2-2. Tarsi: palp d 0, p 3-3-3, v 1-3-0, r 2-3-2; I d 0, p 3-3-4, v 0-0-2 ap, r 2-3-2; II d 0, p 3-3-3 (1 ap), v 0, r 3-3-3; III d 0, p 3-3-3, v 0, r 3-4-3; IV d 0, p 3-3-4 (1 ap), v 0-3-0, r 4-3-4 (1 ap).
Spermatheca (Fig.
Coloration. In alcohol: as described in the male.
Melloina pacifica sp. nov. is the first species of the genus described for Colombia, although it is known that Melloina is distributed in different ecosystems, including cave environments (
Genus Euthycaelus Simon, 1889
Holotype ♂: Colombia, Chocó, Bahía Solano, Jardín Botánico del Pacífico, 6.38, -77.40, elevation 124 m a.s.l., 10–25 February 2022, M. Echeverri, S. Gómez Torres and C. Perafán leg. (ICN 12364).
The specific epithet cunampia is a patronym in honor of the family name of Don José and Don Antonio, members of the Emberá indigenous community, from Mecana, Chocó. Mr. José and Mr. Antonio abandoned their hunting traditions for their community to become touristic and academic guides for the JBP. We want to pay tribute to their community and to the JBP with this recognition.
Males of Euthycaelus cunampia sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other Euthycaelus species by the following combination of morphological features: the shape of the palpal bulb (Fig.
Known only from the type locality (Figs
Male holotype (Figs
Euthycaelus cunampia sp. nov., holotype male A–E palpal bulb A ventral view B dorsal view C prolateral view D retrolateral view E detail of prolateral keels F tibial apophysis on leg I, prolateral view G palpal tibia. Arrow indicates prolateral keels. Abbreviations: PB = prolateral branch, RB = retrolateral branch.
Clypeus: absent. Ocular tubercle (Fig.
Legs pattern: IV>I>II>III. Lengths of legs and palpal segments on Table
Euthycaelus cunampia sp. nov. Male holotype. Lengths of legs and palpal segments.
I | II | III | IV | Palp | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 7.83 | 6.81 | 6.29 | 8.40 | 5.41 |
Patella | 4.97 | 4.13 | 3.41 | 4.06 | 3.0 |
Tibia | 6.06 | 4.87 | 3.83 | 6.50 | 4.43 |
Metatarsus | 6.02 | 5.21 | 5.40 | 8.53 | - |
Tarsus | 3.96 | 3.31 | 3.05 | 3.79 | 2.34 |
Total | 28.89 | 24.33 | 21.98 | 31.28 | 15.18 |
Spination (proximal to distal). Cymbium and tarsi without spines. Femora: palp d 0-0-1p; I d 0-0-1p; II d 0-0-1p; III d 0-0-2p-r; IV d 0-0-1r. Patella: I–II, IV and palp 0; III r 0-0-1d. Tibiae: palp p 0-0-1d, r 0-0-7; I v 0-0-1, p 0-0-1; II v 0-0-2 (ap), p 0-0-1; III d 1-0-2, v 1-2-2 (ap); IV d 2-1-2, v 2-2-3 (ap). Metatarsi: I v 1-0-3 (ap); II v 1-0-3 (ap); III d 1-2-2, v 1-2-3 (ap); IV d 1-2-2, v 1-2-4 (3 ap).
Palp (Fig.
Coloration. Living spider: carapace black, covered by brown setae; palp and legs black, femora and patellae darker; tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi covered by very light setae; abdomen brown (Fig.
Female. Unknown.
Euthycaelus cunampia sp. nov. represents the first published record of the genus and subfamily Schismatothelinae outside the Andean Region and the Eastern Cordillera for Colombia. This species constitutes the northernmost and westernmost record of the genus and subfamily for the country. Previously, the genus had a characteristic cis-Andean distribution over the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia and the Cordillera de Mérida in Venezuela (
Genus Neischnocolus Petrunkevitch, 1925
Holotype ♂: Colombia, Chocó, Bahía Solano, Jardín Botánico del Pacífico, 6.38, -77.40, elevation, 28 m a.s.l., 10–25 February 2022, M. Echeverri, S. Gómez Torres and C. Perafán leg. (ICN 12365). Paratype ♀: same data as holotype (ICN 12366).
The specific epithet mecana is a noun in apposition related to one of the townships of the municipality of Bahía Solano, where the JBP is located. The name of this small town is due to the fact that it is located on the Mecana riverside, with crystalline waters and abundant biodiversity. The JBP promotes the conservation, research, and recovery of the native biodiversity of this region. We would like to pay tribute to its community and the JBP with this recognition.
Male of Neischnocolus mecana sp. nov. can be distinguished from the other Neischnocolus species by the following combination of morphological characters: shape of the palpal bulb piriform, with the tip of the embolus continuing the palpal organ axis (not perpendicular), well-developed prolateral (PS and PI) and apical (A) keels with non-serrated edge, PI discontinuous, absence of retrolateral keel (R), and without granulation or microspikes on embolus or tegulum (Fig.
Known only from the type locality (Figs
Male holotype (Figs
Neischnocolus mecana sp. nov., holotype male A–D copulatory bulb A ventral view B dorsal view C prolateral view D retrolateral view E palpal tibia F apophysis tibial on leg I, prolateroventral view. Abbreviations: A = apical keel, PB = prolateral branch, PI = prolateral inferior keel, PS = prolateral superior keel, RB = retrolateral branch.
Clypeus: absent. Ocular tubercle: ovoid, length 1.14, width 2.34; elevated, forwardly directed. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior eye row slightly recurved. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.54 (circular), ALE 0.68 (oval), PME 0.40 (oval), PLE 0.55 (oval), AME-AME 0.30, AME-ALE 0.18, PME-PME 1.11, PME-PLE 0.19, PLE-PLE 1.80, ALE-PLE 0.24, AME-PME 0.16. Thoracic fovea: transverse, width 3.25; slightly procurved, deep, 8.75 from the anterior edge of carapace. Chelicerae basal segment: length 4.2, width 3.1; with 11 well-developed teeth on each furrow promargin, and a group of ca. 15 small teeth near last three basal promargin teeth. Maxillae (Fig.
Legs pattern: IV>I>II>III. Lengths of legs and palpal segments on Table
Neischnocolus mecana sp. nov. Male holotype. Lengths of legs and palpal segments.
I | II | III | IV | Palp | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 14.95 | 14.16 | 13.02 | 16.18 | 9.45 |
Patella | 7.75 | 7.37 | 6.15 | 6.55 | 5.51 |
Tibia | 12.31 | 10.90 | 10.20 | 13.56 | 7.43 |
Metatarsus | 11.02 | 10.91 | 12.01 | 18.56 | - |
Tarsus | 6.87 | 6.06 | 4.89 | 6.32 | 3.51 |
Total | 53 | 49.4 | 46.17 | 61.17 | 25.9 |
Urticating setae: types I urticating setae present, subtype Ic (
Spination: All femora, patellae, and tarsi 0. Legs I–II and palp 0. Tibiae: I–II 0; III d 0-0-1, v 0-1-2 ap, p 1-1-0, r 0-1-0; IV d 0-1-0, v 0-1-2 ap, p 0-1-1, r 0-0-1. Metatarsi: I–II 0; III d 0, v 0-2-4 (3 ap), p 1-1-1, r 0-1-1; IV d 0-0-1, v 2-3-4 (3 ap), p 1-1-1, r 0-1-1.
Palp (Fig.
Coloration. Living spiders: body color brown, carapace and femora dark brown, legs brown, and abdomen reddish brown. Ventral abdomen with patterns of dark spots (Fig.
Female paratype (Figs
Clypeus: absent. Ocular tubercle: ovoid, length 1.34, width 2.62; elevated, forwardly directed. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior eye row slightly recurved. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.53 (circular), ALE 0.70 (oval), PME 0.41 (oval), PLE 0.50 (oval), AME-AME 0.34, AME-ALE 0.30, PME-PME 1.27, PME-PLE 0.26, PLE-PLE 2.00, ALE-PLE 0.36, AME-PME 0.21. Thoracic fovea: transverse, width 3.50; slightly procurved, deep, 9.11 from the anterior edge of carapace. Chelicerae basal segment: length 5.1, width 3.6; with 11 well-developed teeth on each furrow promargin, and a group of ca. 12 small teeth near last three basal promargin teeth. Maxillae (Fig.
Legs pattern: IV>I>II>III. Lengths of legs and palpal segments on Table
Neischnocolus mecana sp. nov. Female paratype. Lengths of legs and palpal segments.
I | II | III | IV | Palp | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Femur | 11.24 | 10.50 | 8.79 | 12.07 | 9.16 |
Patella | 7.53 | 6.34 | 5.54 | 6.57 | 5.90 |
Tibia | 8.04 | 6.54 | 6.30 | 8.80 | 6.14 |
Metatarsus | 6.20 | 5.83 | 7.69 | 12.07 | - |
Tarsus | 4.00 | 3.34 | 3.82 | 4.17 | 5.27 |
Total | 37.01 | 32.55 | 32.14 | 43.68 | 26.47 |
Urticating setae: types I urticating setae present, subtype Ic (
Spination: All femora, patellae, and tarsi 0. Tibiae: palp 0-0-2 ap; I d 0, v 0-0-2 ap, p 0, r 0; II d 0, v 0-0-3 ap, p 0-1-0, r 0; III d 1-0-0, v 0-1-3 ap, p 1-1-0, r 0-1-1; IV d 0, v 0-1-3 ap, p 1-1-0, r 1-1-1. Metatarsi: I 0; II d 0, v 0-1-2 ap, p 0-1-0, r 0; III d 0-1-1, v 0-3-2 ap, p 0-0-1 ap, r 0-0-1 ap; IV d 0-0-1, v 3-4-5 (3 ap), p 1-2-0, r 0-1-1.
Spermathecae (Fig.
Coloration. Living spiders: carapace, abdomen, and legs black, legs with light-colored stripes at the joints. Ventral abdomen with patterns of dark spots (Fig.
Neischnocolus mecana sp. nov. it is the fourth species of the genus described for Colombia and it is the first record of Neischnocolus for the Chocó biogeographic region, as well as the first record for the Colombian Pacific. With this description, the known geographic range of the genus is extended. Currently, Neischnocolus is distributed in Colombia in the Andean, Amazonian, and Pacific regions. It is known that Neischnocolus is widely distributed in the Colombian territory, with a very extensive geographical and altitudinal range, and that most of its diversity has not yet been described (
We thank the Escuela de Administración, Finanzas e Instituto Tecnológico (EAFIT University) of Medellín, Colombia, for the financial support for the field work and the equipment provided for the field and laboratory work. We thank Luisa Fernanda Puerta, the JBP staff, and the Mecana community for receiving and hosting us, especially José Cunampia and Antonio Cunampia for all the help they gave us during the field work. We would also like to thank Ray Gabriel and Danniella Sherwood for early discussion of Euthycaelus species from Panama and Colombia. The author CP thanks the financial support of the National System of Researchers (SNI), Uruguay. Thanks to D. Ríos Tamayo, L. Montes de Oca, and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and corrections. Thanks to Mateo Giraldo for the photographs of Fig.
No conflict of interest was declared.
No ethical statement was reported.
No funding was reported.
Mariana Echeverri and Sebastián Gómez Torres: participated in the design and execution of the field work, reviewed and analyzed the specimens in the laboratory, described the species, took and edited the photographs, wrote the manuscript. Nicolás Pinel: participated in the design of the field work, wrote the manuscript. Carlos Perafán: participated in the design and execution of the field work, reviewed and analyzed the specimens in the laboratory, performed the taxonomic analysis, wrote the manuscript.
Nicolás Pinel https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-3096
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.