Research Article
Print
Research Article
Diminishing the taxonomic gap in the neotropical soldierless termites: descriptions of four new genera and a new Anoplotermes species (Isoptera, Termitidae, Apicotermitinae)
expand article infoTiago F. Carrijo, Daniel Castro§, Menglin Wang|, Joice P. Constantini, Thomas Bourguignon|#, Eliana M. Cancello, Yves Roisin¤, Rudolf H. Scheffrahn«
‡ Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, Brazil
§ Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI, Leticia, Colombia
| Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
¶ Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
# Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
¤ Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
« University of Florida, Davie, United States of America
Open Access

Abstract

The neotropical Apicotermitinae is a common and widespread clade of mostly soil-feeding soldierless termites. With few exceptions, species of this group were originally assigned to the genus Anoplotermes Müller, 1873. The application of internal worker morphology coupled with genetic sequencing has recently shed light on the true diversity of this subfamily. Herein, Anoplotermes susanae Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, sp. nov. and four new species in four new genera are described: Hirsutitermes kanzakii Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov. et sp. nov., Krecekitermes daironi Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov. et sp. nov., Mangolditermes curveileum Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov. et sp. nov., and Ourissotermes giblinorum Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov. et sp. nov. Worker descriptions are based mainly on worker gut morphology, including the enteric valve, while imagoes were described based on external characters. A Bayesian phylogenetic tree of New World Apicotermitinae was constructed using the complete mitogenome to infer genera relationships and corroborate the taxonomic decisions. Distribution maps and a dichotomic key to the known Neotropical Apicotermitinae genera are provided.

Key words

Enteric valve armature, Linnean shortfall, mitogenome sequencing, soil-feeder, species distribution, taxonomy

Introduction

Termites are dominant fauna of tropical ecosystems, having a high abundance, density, and biomass, especially in tropical soils (Fittkau and Klinge 1973; Barros et al. 2004; Menta and Remelli 2020; Demetrio et al. 2021). During their feeding and construction activities, soil-feeding termites provide many ecosystem services (Jouquet et al. 2011; Lavelle et al. 2014; Duran-Bautista et al. 2020b). Termites have a wide diet based on organic matter ranging across the humification spectrum of the feeding substrate (Eggleton 2011). Many authors classified them into functional or feeding groups (De Souza and Brown 1994; Eggleton et al. 1997; Donovan et al. 2001; Eggleton and Tayasu 2001; Davies 2002), the most used of which are those of Donovan et al. (2001), who proposed groups III and IV for ‘true’ soil-feeders, or humus-feeders. This classification, however, shows some limitations for neotropical termites, because the correlation among morphological differences in the enteric valve armature (EVA), mandibles and the humification gradient does not always follows the pattern described (Bourguignon et al. 2011b). Thus, the use of the terms soil- or humus-feeders might be more appropriate for this taxon.

Soil-feeding, the ability to digest intractable organic elements from the soil, is exclusive to the family Termitidae (Eggleton and Tayasu 2001; Bucek et al. 2019). As far as we know, most of the neotropical soldierless termites (Apicotermitinae) are soil-feeders (except for Ruptitermes, some species of Aparatermes, and Anoplotermes pacificus – for the last one see Kaiser 1953), and their abundance and species richness can reach up to 50% of all termite records in some assemblages of South America (Carrijo et al. 2009; Bourguignon et al. 2011a; Palin et al. 2011; da Silva et al. 2019; Dahlsjö et al. 2020; Castro et al. 2021).

Identification of termite workers requires examination of gut morphology, especially that of the enteric valve armature (EVA), one of the most important diagnostic characters for them (Scheffrahn 2013; Bourguignon et al. 2016b; Scheffrahn et al. 2017; Castro et al. 2018, 2020). The dissection of the EVA is complicated and requires a trained specialist, imposing difficulties and often limiting identification of soldierless species to morphospecies status in many studies (Sanabria et al. 2016; Casalla and Korb 2019; Duran-Bautista et al. 2020a). Moreover, it has been shown that some recently described species have a widespread distribution (Scheffrahn et al. 2017; Constantini et al. 2018), as in the case of Rustitermes boteroi (Castro et al. 2020), and can be indicator species of disturbed habitats (Castro et al. 2021).

Currently, 57 species belonging to 17 genera of soldierless termites are recognized in the Neotropics (Constantino 2022), representing 25% of the world’s Apicotermitinae. However, many species and genera are still to be described in Central and South America (Bourguignon et al. 2013) (for some examples, see the website: https://www.termitediversity.org). Nine of the 17 described genera in the Neotropics are monotypic, and molecular analyses have pointed out that a large number of undescribed genera are monotypic (Bourguignon et al. 2013; Scheffrahn 2019). The Neotropical genera Anoplotermes (21 spp.) and Ruptitermes (13 spp.) are the most speciose, followed by Aparatermes (4 spp.), and five genera with two described species to date (Compositermes, Humutermes, Hydrecotermes, Patawatermes, and Tonsuritermes). Nevertheless, the genus Anoplotermes needs to be taxonomically revised, which will likely lead to the description of new genera and synonymies (Bourguignon et al. 2010, 2016b). The descriptions of new soldierless taxa are paramount to fill what is probably the main taxonomic gap (i.e., Linnean shortfall) in termitology. Filling this gap will facilitate future research on neotropical termites, especially related to soil ecology, where soldierless termites are very abundant and diverse (Bourguignon et al. 2016a; Rodríguez-León et al. 2021).

In this paper, we describe four monotypic soldierless genera and a new Anoplotermes species based on the morphology of the worker and imago castes. We also provide a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on the complete mitogenome, including all but two neotropical Apicotermitinae genera. Finally, an illustrated dichotomous key for the worker caste is provided based on the diagnostic characters of the genera published to date.

Material and method

The specimens examined in this study were collected and preserved in 75%, 85%, or 92% ethanol and were deposited at the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (MZUSP); the Museo Entomológico de la Facultad de Agronomía of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C, Colombia (UNAB); the Colección de Artrópodos Terrestres de la Amazonía Colombiana of the SINCHI Institute in Leticia, Amazonas, Colombia (CATAC); the University of Florida Termite Collection at Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Davie, Florida, United States (UFTC, Scheffrahn 2019); and the Unit of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium (ULB).

Morphological examination of the enteric valve armature (EVA) and digestive tube was done on the worker caste. The terminology used for the worker digestive tube and mandibles follows Noirot (2001), Sands (1972), and Deligne (1999). We used the term “molar process” proposed by Constantini et al. (2020). The following morphometric characters were measured for workers and/or alates [the numbers in parentheses are in accordance with Roonwal (1970)]: length of head to lateral base of mandibles (5), maximum head width (17), inter-eye (between eye) distance (52), maximum ocellus diameter (55), minimum ocellus diameter (56), maximum diameter of eye (48), minimum diameter of eye with margin (49), pronotum length (65), pronotum width (68), hind tibia and fore tibia lengths (85), width of fore tibia (86), and fore tibia width: length ratio (index 53). Size of individuals (imagoes and workers) are described in reference to other neotropical soldierless termites, and they can be very small, small, medium, or large.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses were performed on a dataset including the four new genera in addition to 15 of the 17 previously described genera of Apicotermitinae from the New World (Fig. 12, Suppl. material 1). Samples of the new taxa used in the phylogeny are highlighted in the examined material with two asterisks (**). The two missing genera were Echinotermes and Amplucrutermes. We also included Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. and, for the first time, the type of the genus Anoplotermes, A. pacificus Müller, 1873. We sequenced the mitochondrial genomes of samples of Apicotermitinae preserved in 80% ethanol and stored at room temperature for more than 20 years. Briefly, whole genomic DNA was extracted from entire termite workers (including gut) using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue extraction kit (Qiagen). Libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA Library Preparation Kit (New England Biolabs) and the Unique Dual Indexing Kit (New England Biolabs) without enzymatic fragmentation step and with one-fifteenth of the reagent volumes recommended by the manufacturer. Libraries were paired-end sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X or Novaseq platforms.

The alignment of the 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes and the two ribosomal RNAs was performed separately with the Mafft Multiple Alignment plugin (Katoh and Standley 2013) implemented in Geneious v. 9.1 (Biomatters Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). The alignments were edited by eye. An alignment of 15,024 bp was obtained and partitioned in protein-coding genes and ribosomal RNA. The model GTR+I+G was selected for both partitions by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) in the IQ-TREE web server (Nguyen et al. 2015; Trifinopoulos et al. 2016). Phylogenetic analyses were performed by Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI), with the IQ-TREE and BEAST 1.8.0 (Drummond and Rambaut 2007), respectively. For the BI, we used a Yule speciation process (Gernhard 2008) and a strict molecular clock as priors. Note that these analyses were performed to estimate the relationships among genera of Apicotermitinae rather than divergence time. The analysis was performed with Markov chain Monte Carlo searches (MCMC) conducted for 50 million generations. Convergence and stationarity were assessed with Tracer 1.6 (Suchard et al. 2018), and the tree was visualized using Figtree 1.3.1. Results between analyses were similar, and we preferred the BI for results and discussion, but divergences were pointed in the text.

Distribution maps (Fig. 13) were created using ArcGIS desktop 10.8 (ESRI, Redlands, CA). Microphotographs were taken using a Leica S9i stereomicroscope as multi-layered mounts with an integrated Leica digital camera for workers and imagoes. Worker mandibles and EVA microphotographs from the MZUSP were taken using a Leica ICCM50 W microscope with an integrated camera. Enteric valves from UFTC collection were photographed with a Leica CTR 5500 compound microscope. EVA from CATAC and UNAB were photographed with an Olympus BX53 microscope coupled to an Olympus DP27 digital camera.

Results

Taxonomy

Anoplotermes Müller, 1873

Anoplotermes susanae Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, sp. nov.

Material examined

Holotype. Worker from lot MZUSP 13213** (in a separate vial with the remaining sample).

Type locality

Brazil. Rondônia, Porto Velho, Mutum-Paraná, -9.6375, -65.0567.

Type repository

MZUSP.

Paratypes. Brazil. Rondônia, Porto Velho, Abunã, (-9.6257, -65.4423), 15.MAY.2010, 122 m, TF Carrijo and MM Rocha coll. (MZUSP 17671); Porto Velho, Mutum-Paraná,(-9.4390, -64.8409), 17.SEP.2011, 110 m, TF Carrijo and LR Fernandes coll. (MZUSP 17684); (-9.4406, -64.8497), 26.JUN.2010, 116 m, TF Carrijo and SP Rosa coll. (MZUSP 17675); (-9.6375, -65.0567), 5.MAR.2010, 106 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13213**). FRENCH GUIANA. Cayenne, Sinnamary, (5.0675, -53.0592), 4.FEB.2008, 34 m, J. Křeček coll. (UFTC FG277); Sinnamary, Petit Saut road, (5.10952, -52.96583), FEB.2019, 86 m, Y Roisin, C Legrand coll. (ULB Pb19-30B**); Régina, Camp Patawa, (4.541, -52.157), 11.FEB.2007, T Bourguignon coll. (ULB Qua3-1.3-3); Régina, Nouragues Inselberg Station, (4.0852, -52.6815), 15.JAN.2010, T Bourguignon, Y Roisin, J Šobotník, R. Hanus, J Cvačka coll. (ULB G451). PERU. Pasco, Kirishari, (-10.155210, -75.009120), 27.MAY.2014, 272 m, TF Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, JR Mangold, A Mullins, J Křeček, S Kuswanto, T Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PU393).

Diagnosis

The EVA has a “star-like” plaque attached to only one cushion; all cushions are striated. The cushions are adorned with a few small spines in the proximal portion (P1 junction). The mixed segment has an inflated mesenteric tongue.

Description

Imago (Fig. 1A, B, Table 1). Very small. Head capsule pale reddish, covered with numerous short hairs and a few sparse bristles. Eye elliptic, with the dorsoventral diameter shorter. Ocelli circular, large relative to eye. Fontanelle oval, very small. Postclypeus barely inflated, pale brown, concolorous with pro-, meso-, and metanotum. Anteclypeus narrow with anterolateral margins slightly concave, tip rounded. Antenna with 12 articles (formula 2>3≈4<5). Pronotum with short bristles along margins and very short hairs on surface; anterior margin straight, with median depression. Meso- and metanotum covered with numerous short hairs.

Figure 1. 

Imago head and pronotum in dorsal and lateral view A, B Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. C, D Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov. E, F Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov. G, H Ourissotermes giblinorum sp. nov.

Table 1.

Measurements of imagoes (range and mean in mm). L: length; W: width; c = number of colonies; n = number of individuals.

A. susanae ♀ (c = 2, n = 3) A. susanae ♂ (c = 1, n = 1) H. kanzakii ♂ (c = 1, n = 1) K. daironi ♀ (c = 1, n = 2) K. daironi ♂ (c = 1, n = 1) O. giblinorum ♀ (c = 1, n = 3) O. giblinorum ♂ (c = 1, n = 2)
Head length to lateral base of mandibles 0.41–0.43 (0.44) 0.37 1.10 0.46–0.48 (0.47) 0.55 0.6–0.63 (0.61) 0.63–0.68 (0.65)
Maximum head width 0.42–0.44 (0.43) 0.42 1.42 0.50–0.54 (0.52) 0.55 0.78–0.8 (0.79) 0.73–0.75 (0.74)
Inter-eye distance 0.40–0.41 (0.40) 0.04 1.27 0.34–0.37 (0.36) 0.54 0.73–0.75 (0.74) 0.70–0.73 (0.71)
Max. diameter ocellus 0.07–0.08 (0.07) 0.07 0.15 0.07–0.08 (0.07) 0.12 0.13–0.13 (0.13) 0.10–0.11 (0.10)
Min. diameter ocellus 0.05–0.06 (0.06) 0.05 0.10 0.05–0.05 (0.05) 0.09 0.09–0.10 (0.10) 0.08–0.09 (0.08)
Max. diameter eye 0.19–0.20 (0.19) 0.17 0.37 0.19–0.22 (0.21) 0.25 0.25–0.28 (0.26) 0.26–0.28 (0.27)
Min. diameter eye 0.15–0.17 (0.16) 0.15 0.35 0.16–0.16 (0.16) 0.20 0.23–0.25 (0.24) 0.23–0.24 (0.23)
Pronotum length 0.27–0.30 (0.28) 0.27 0.77 0.34–0.35 (0.34) 0.37 0.48–0.50 (0.49) 0.45–0.48 (0.46)
Pronotum width 0.41–0.45 (0.43) 0.42 1.35 0.42–0.43 (0.42) 0.55 0.73–0.78 (0.76) 0.71–0.73 (0.72)
Hind tibia length 0.45–0.47 (0.47) 0.37 1.725 0.35–0.40 (0.37) 0.70 0.98–1.05 (1.01) 0.98–1.05 (1.01)
Fore tibia length 0.37–0.37 (0.37) 0.37 1.325 0.36–0.38 (0.37) 0.55 0.75–0.75 (0.75) 0.70–0.70 (0.70)
Fore tibia width 0.06–0.07 (0.07) 0.07 0.19 0.07–0.07 (0.07) 0.12 0.13–0.13 (0.13) 0.13–0.13 (0.13)
Fore tibia W/L ratio 0.17–0.20 (0.19) 0.20 0.14 0.19–0.19 (0.19) 0.23 0.173–0.173 (0.17) 0.185–0.185 (0.18)

Worker (Fig. 2A, B, Table 2). Monomorphic. Very small. Head capsule and antennal articles whitish. Fontanelle inconspicuous. Antenna with 12 or 13 articles. Postclypeus moderately inflated. Head capsule covered with numerous short hairs and sparse longer setae on anteclypeus and postclypeus. Left mandible with apical tooth more prominent than (M1+2), gap between the two forming acute angle; posterior margin of M1+2 weakly concave; M3 (third marginal) less prominent than M1+2, edges forming an acute angle; molar prominence well developed, eclipsing molar process in dorsal view. Right mandible with apical tooth more prominent than M1; gap between M1 and M2 forming right angle, M2 with concave posterior margin (Fig. 5). Pronotum with long bristles and short hairs in the margins and surface. Tergites and sternites with short and microscopic hairs on the surface in the margins. Fore tibia (Fig. 4A) strongly inflated, short; inner surface with a line of long bristles from mid-length to apex.

Figure 2. 

Head capsule of workers A, B Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. C, D Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov. E, F Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov.

Table 2.

Measurements of workers (range and mean in mm). LH bm: length of head to lateral base of mandibles; WH max: maximum width of head; LHT: length of hind tibia; LPT: length of protibia; WPT: width of protibia; RPT: ratio WL of protibia. c = number of colonies; n = number of individuals.

Species LH bm WH max LHT LPT WPT RPT
Anoplotermes susanae (c = 3, n = 10) 0.26–0.41 (0.35) 0.43–0.60 (0.50) 0.30–0.46 (0.36) 0.29–0.40 (0.33) 0.09–0.14 (0.10) 0.22–0.38 (0.32)
Hirsutitermes kanzakii (c = 8, n = 21) 0.53–1.40 (0.83) 0.90–1.28 (1.13) 0.61–1.28 (0.91) 0.68–1.05 (0.85) 0.16–0.29 (0.22) 0.20–0.31 (0.25)
Krecekitermes daironi (c = 10, n = 35) 0.26–0.55 (0.40) 0.57–0.63 (0.61) 0.32–0.47 (0.40) 0.35–0.42 (0.39) 0.10–0.12 (0.11) 0.24–0.33 (0.29)
Mangolditermes curveileum (c = 9, n = 56) 0.73–0.99 (0.82) 0.75–1.40 (1.13) 0.45–1.05 (0.76) 0.4–0.91 (0.68) 0.12–0.27 (0.21) 0.25–0.41 (0.32)
Ourissotermes giblinorum (c = 3, n = 10) 0.58–0.70 (0.64) 0.70–0.80 (0.76) 0.42–0.80 (0.69) 0.48–0.65 (0.60) 0.17–0.23 (0.19) 0.28–0.37 (0.32)

Gut (Fig. 6A) elongated; mixed segment (MS): mesenteric tongue with a whitish spherical mesenteric nodule in ventral view. First proctodeal segment (P1) width uniform along its entire length. Enteric valve seating (EVS) elongated and cylindrical; armed with a “star-like” plaque on only one cushion; the plaque projects 16–20 spines along its margin and 1–3 surface spines. Cushions and inter-cushions vertically striated; proximal part of the cushion is smooth, without ornamentation (for this reason it gives the appearance of wrinkled fabric, which is very common); cushions with 5–7 short spines are in the distal part of the cushion directed backward, in the inflated central part of the cushion. Enteric valve seating filled with bacteria located on “bacterial slime”.

Comparison and remarks

Anoplotermes susanae can be distinguished from all other Anoplotermes species by the “star-like” plaque of the EVA. Although Anoplotermes parvus also has a sclerotized plate on the EVA, it forms an asymmetrical spiny mass (Fig. 11G).

Molecular analysis

The phylogeny recovered this species as the sister group of the four other Anoplotermes species (including the type species) included in this study, except A. meridianus, which was recovered as the sister group of Humutermes. The EVA and COI sequence alone suggested this species should be placed in a new genus; however, the external and gut morphology, and the complete mitogenome, corroborate it as a new Anoplotermes species.

Field observation and distribution

This species is distributed in Ecuador, Brazil, and French Guiana (Fig. 13). It has been found mainly on the ground and in small epigeous nests (not confirmed if its own nest). On one occasion, A. susanae was found adjacent to workers of an Anhangatermes species. Other studies have reported this species as morphospecies under the name of Anoplotermes grp AC in Ecuador (Dahlsjö et al. 2020) and Anoplotermes-group sp. AK in French Guiana (Bourguignon et al. 2011a, 2013, 2015).

Etymology

This species is named in honor of Susan G. Scheffrahn, wife of RHS.

Hirsutitermes Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov.

Type species

Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov.

Diagnosis

Enteric valve armature (EVA) embellished with hundreds of thin spines on the posterior rim. The EVA seating is tubular, trilobed, and long. The mesenteric tongue is long but not inflated.

Description

Imago (Fig. 1C, D, Table 1). Head forms a very gentle curve in lateral view. Fontanelle conspicuous, heart-shaped, situated near a virtual line from the posterior margin of eyes, behind an oval-shaped spot (= labral medial muscle). Two conspicuous oval patches above antennal sockets. Antenna with 12 articles (formula 2>3<4≈5). Pronotum with median suture well marked; anterior margin raised.

Worker (Fig. 2C, D, Table 2). Fontanelle rounded, conspicuous but with faint margins. Postclypeus moderately inflated. Antenna with 14 articles (formula 2>3=4<5). Left mandible with apical tooth more prominent than M1+2; margins of M3 forming an obtuse angle with the tip slightly rounded and directed forward; molar process conspicuous and not eclipsed by the molar prominence; molar prominence well developed. Right mandible with apical tooth much more prominent than M1; M1 small, less prominent than M2; M2 margins curved; molar plate concave, with a few ridges – not visible in the figure (Fig. 5B). Gut with long mesenteric tongue but not inflated; EVA seating tubular, trilobed, and long (Fig. 6B); EVA ornamented with hundreds of thin spines on the posterior portion of the cushions (Fig. 9A–C).

Comparison and remarks

The EVA of Hirsutitermes is closest to that of Longustitermes; however, the spines of Hirsutitermes are longer and thinner than those of Longustitermes and the anterior portion of the cushions is more rounded in the latter than pyriform in the former. In addition, the external morphology of these two genera is very different, Longustitermes is smaller in size and has a trilobed EVS, while Hirsutitermes has a tubular EVS.

Molecular analysis

The position of the genus is not clear. In the BI analysis, Hirsutitermes was recovered as the sister group of the clade composed of Krecekitermes and Anoplotermes with a posterior probability of 0.96 (Fig. 12). In the ML analysis, the genus was recovered as sister group to all New World Apicotermitinae (Suppl. material 2).

Etymology

From the Latin hirsutus, meaning hairy, rough, refers to the hirsute appearance of the EVA armature.

Hirsutitermes kanzakii Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, sp. nov.

Material examined

Holotype. Worker from lot UNAB 6137 (in a separate vial with the remaining sample).

Type locality

Colombia. Caquetá, Florencia, Palmichar, 1.7145, -75.6148.

Type repository

UNAB.

Paratypes. Bolivia. Beni, Puerto Leigue, (-14.2126, -64.9402), 29.MAY.2013, 149 m, TF Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, JR Mangold, A Mullins, J Křeček, T Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC BO532). Brazil. Rondônia, Porto Velho, Abunã, (-9.6341, -65.4513), 11.MAR.2010, 123 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13054); (-9.632, -65.4387), 18.MAY.2010, 113 m, TF Carrijo and MM Rocha coll. (MZUSP 17968); (-9.6422, -65.4462), 28.JUN.2010, 104 m, TF Carrijo and SP Rosa coll. (MZUSP 17970**); (-9.6341, -65.4513), 29.JUN.2010, 123 m, TF Carrijo and SP Rosa coll. (MZUSP 17971); (-9.632, -65.4387), 5.APR.2011, 113 m, VTC Mercado and RS Probst coll. (MZUSP 17973); Porto Velho, Jaci Paraná, (-9.4502, -64.3674), 20.SEP.2010, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 17976); (-9.4502, -64.3674), 12.JAN.2011, RG Santos and CY Mandai coll. (MZUSP 17977); Porto Velho, Nova Mutum-Paraná, (-9.3209, -64.7237), 18.SEP.2010, 96 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 17975**). Colombia. Caquetá, Florencia, Palmichar, (1.7145, -75.6148), 23.MAR.2016, 241 m, Y Virguez coll. (CATAC-1801, UNAB 6137); Bajo Caldas, (1.6481, -75.6360), 12.DEC.2018, 429 m, M Perez coll. (CATAC-4673); Bélen de los Andaquies, Agua Dulce, (1.3372, -75.8094), 23.APR.2018, 262 m, J Murillo coll. (CATAC-6745). French Guiana. Cayenne, Régina, Nouragues Inselberg Station, (4.0904, -52.6772), 23.JAN.2010, T Bourguignon, Y Roisin, J Šobotník, R. Hanus, J Cvačka coll. (ULB G627); Sinnamary, Petit Saut road, (5.11056, -52.96540), FEB.2019, 72 m, Y Roisin, C Legrand, P Babzenko, N Kaczmarek coll. (ULB L05-10C**). Trinidad and Tobago. Tunapuna-Piarco, Blanchisseuse, (10.7963, -61.2826), 26.MAY.2003, 47 m, JA Chase, J Křeček, B Maharajh, JR Mangold, RH Scheffrahn, and J Warner coll. (UFTC TT1357**); Tunapuna, (10.6675, -61.3991), 10.JUN.2004, 315 m, J Davis coll. (UFTC TT2166). Venezuela. Sucre, San Esteban, (10.3013, -64.3758), 28.SEP.2007, JA Chase, JR Mangold, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC VZ363).

Diagnosis

As described for the genus.

Description

Imago (Fig. 1C, D, Table 1). Medium size. Head capsule brown, covered with dozens of long bristles and microscopic hairs, bristle bases marked. Eyes sub-circular and relatively small. Ocelli sub-oval of medium-size and far away from the eyes. Postclypeus modestly inflated and concolorous with oval patches. Pronotum with the posterior margin emarginated, densely covered with long and short hairs on the margins and surface. Meso- and metanotum densely covered with numerous long hairs.

Worker (Fig. 2C, D, Table 2). Monomorphic. Medium size. Body and head size range variable, from medium to large. Head capsule pale yellow, covered with numerous long hairs and sparse bristles of slightly larger size; dorsal surface flat in lateral view. Antennal articles translucent white. Pronotum with very long bristles, especially in the middle of anterior and posterior lobes. Tergites and sternites with short hairs on the surface and long bristles in the posterior margins. Forecoxa and fore femur with medium-sized spines. Fore tibia (Fig. 4B) moderately inflated and heavily covered with spines and setae of different sizes.

Gut (Fig. 6B) with long mesenteric tongue, not inflated. Enteric valve seating relatively long and tubular, often with three distinct but small lobes; P3-a/enteric valve seating (EVS) junction visible in dorsal view; EVA armed (Fig. 9A–C) with hundreds of long, slender, sclerotized spines arranged from the fourth portion near of the EVA distal portion up to tip of cushions and inter-cushion cuticle. Cushions pyriform pouches with about 20 spicules; scales between pouches and spines with microscopic fringes on posterior margins.

Remarks

See remarks for the genus.

Ecology and distribution

Hirsutitermes kanzakii is distributed from Bolivia to Trinidad and Tobago. The material examined for this study did not include samples from Ecuador, but Dahlsjö et al. (2020) reported this species as Anoplotermes grp OI. Likewise, previous studies reported this species as Anoplotermes-group sp AN in French Guiana (Bourguignon et al. 2011a, b, 2013, 2015) and Apicotermitinae sp. 2 in Colombia (Castro et al. 2021). This species has a wide distribution in greater Amazonia where it is found in the soil. In Colombia, it is rather common in natural forests but uncommon in young rubber plantations (Castro et al. 2021).

Etymology

This species is named in honor of Dr. Natsumi Kanzaki, a Japanese nematologist who has a keen interest in the nematodes of termites.

Krecekitermes Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov.

Type species

Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov.

Diagnosis

Dehiscent organs fill the hemocoel anterior to the crop. The EVS forms three large lobes. The Mesenteron/P1 junction is well marked, but the mixed segment is short. The EVA armature of Krecekitermes is composed of cushions with six sclerotized and crown-shaped termini adorned with thorns.

Description

Imago (Fig. 1E, F, Table 1). Dorsal surface of the head capsule concave in lateral view. Fontanelle very conspicuous. Postclypeus barely inflated, with the median suture well-marked. Antenna with 14 or 15 articles (formula 2>3<4≈5<6).

Worker (Fig. 2E, F, Table 2). Head dorsal surface slightly concave in lateral view. Antenna whitish, with 13 or 14 articles, 2>3<4<5. Postclypeus robustly inflated. Left mandible with the apical tooth just as prominent as M1+2; edges of M3 forming an obtuse angle; truncated tip pointing backward; molar prominence well developed and prominent, hiding the molar process completely in dorsal view. Right mandible with apical tooth more prominent than M1; M1 well developed; M2 with prominent round tip pointing backward; margin between M1 and M2 forming an obtuse angle (Fig. 5C). Dehiscent organs conspicuous in most individuals. Gut (Fig. 6C) with short mixed segment, thickening in the mesenteric tongue. The EVA armature is composed of six sclerotized and crown-shaped termini adorned with thorns in the posterior part of the cushions.

Comparison and remarks

Dissimulitermes and Ruptitermes present dehiscent organs like Krecekitermes; however, Ruptitermes does not present armature in the EVA, except for R. bandeirai, but this species is much larger, and the spines of the EVA armature are concentrated in only three cushions. Dissimulitermes presents an EVA armature with sclerotized plates and Krecekitermes an EVA armature formed only by spines, without plates. Enteric valve seating (EVS) is tubular in Dissimulitermes and is trilobed in Krecekitermes.

Molecular analysis

This genus was recovered as the sister group of Anoplotermes, in a clade composed of Hirsutitermes + Krecekitermes + Anoplotermes (Fig. 12). But the position of Hirsutitermes was divergent between ML and BI analyses (Fig. 12, Suppl. material 2).

Etymology

We named this genus in honor of Dr. Jan Křeček, a retired Czech terminologist who, along with RHS, contributed to many termite descriptions while at the University of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale R.E.C.

Krecekitermes daironi Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, sp. nov.

Material examined

Holotype. Worker from lot MZUSP 17407** (in a separate vial with the remaining sample).

Type locality

Brazil. Rondônia, Porto Velho, Mutum-Paraná, -9.4513, -64.8439.

Type repository

MZUSP.

Paratypes. Bolivia. Cochabamba, Chapare, Villa Tunari, (-16.9704, -65.2100), 26.MAY.2013, 247 m, TF Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, JR Mangold, A Mullins, J Křeček, S. Kuswanto, T Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC BO84); (-17.0024, -65.4356), 26.MAY.2013, 332 m, TF Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, JR Mangold, A Mullins, J Křeček, S. Kuswanto, T Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC BO116, BO119). Brazil. Rondônia, Porto Velho, Abunã, (-9.5965, -65.3371), 15.MAY.2010, 99 m, TF Carrijo and MM Rocha coll. (MZUSP 17377); (-9.6422, -65.4462), 10.MAR.2010, 103 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13061); Porto Velho, Jaci Paraná, (-9.1627, -64.6211), 14.SEP.2010, 97 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 17411); (-9.1466, -64.6307), 14.SEP.2010, 104 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 18812); 30.MAR.2011, 104 m, RG Santos and CY Mandai coll. (MZUSP 18893); Porto Velho, Mutum-Paraná, (-9.4401, -64.7863), 27.FEB.2010, 101 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13193); 10.SEP.2010, 101 m, MM Rocha and VTC Mercado coll. (MZUSP 17397); (-9.4513, -64.8439), 30.MAR.2010, 112 m, MM Rocha and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 17407**, 17408); (-9.4428, -64.7946), 28.FEB.2010, 98 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13190); (-9.61, -65.0567), 4.MAR.2010, 102 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13214); (-9.6069, -65.0458), 10.JAN.2011, 102 m, MM Rocha and LP Prado coll. (MZUSP 17400); (-9.5858, -65.0536), 26.JUN.2010, 206 m, TF Carrijo and SP Rosa coll. (MZUSP 17483**); 1.JAN.2011, 206 m, VTC Mercado and RS Probst coll. (MZUSP 18128); (-9.5791, -65.0579), 3.APR.2011, 136 m, VTC Mercado and RS Probst coll. (MZUSP 17402, 17403). Colombia. Amazonas, Puerto Nariño, (-3.7675, -70.3492), 17.JUL.2018, 95 m, JA Chase coll. (CATAC-3393). Caquetá, Belén de los Andaquíes, El Chocho, (1.4240, -75.7786), 31.JAN.2019, 286 m, M Pérez coll. (CATAC-6432); Morelia, San Marcos, (1.3900, -75.6511), 14.FEB.2019, 246 m, M Pérez coll. (CATAC-6575, UNAB 6135); San Vicente del Caguán, Buenos Aires, (2.069, -74.9334), 17.APR.2018, 399 m, J Murillo coll. (CATAC-7462). Vaupés, Mitú, Mituseño, (1.2265, -70.1219), 26.MAR.2019, 195 m, JA Chase coll. Ecuador. Guayas, Guayaquil, Bosque Protector Cerro Blanco, (-2.1809, -80.0196), 16.DIC.2001, 55 m, J Křeček coll. (UFTC EC1.1); Orellana, Tuptini, Yasuni station area (-0.67177, -76.39793), 29–31.APR.2011, 223 m, JA Chase, J. Křeček, JR Mangold, TJ Myles, A. Mullins, T. Nishimura, R Setter, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC EC517**, EC1037). French Guiana. Cayenne, Sinnamary, (5.0675, -53.0592), 4.FEB.2008, 34 m, J. Křeček coll. (UFTC FG277.4, FG726); (5.0238, -53.0248), 6.FEB.2008, 52 m, J. Křeček coll. (UFTC FG78, FG79); (5.07610, -53.02168), 04.JUN.2016, 90 m, Y Roisin, JE Romero Arias, S Hellemans coll. (ULB G16-128**); Régina, Nouragues Inselberg Station, (4.0833, -52.6815), 16.JAN.2010, T Bourguignon, Y Roisin, J Šobotník, R. Hanus, J Cvačka coll. (ULB G484). Peru. Madre de Dios, Reserva Nacional Tambopata, (-13.1370, -69.6120), 9.SEP.2015, L Carnohan coll. (UFTC PU1114, PU1126).

Diagnosis

As described for the genus.

Description

Imago. (Fig. 1E, F, Table 1). Head capsule reddish brown, covered with bristles and short hairs. Eyes and ocelli sub-circular. Ocelli large, about the diameter of antennal sockets. Fontanelle oval-shaped and situated near a virtual line from the posterior margin of eyes. Pronotum elongated, covered with long bristles grouped on the margins and short hairs on the surface; lateral margins rounded.

Worker (Fig. 2E, F, Table 2). Monomorphic. Medium to large-size. Fontanelle indistinct, small, and oval. Head capsule, anteclypeus, and postclypeus pale yellow, densely covered with numerous bristles. Pronotum with long bristles on the anterior lobe and a few very long bristles on the posterior lobe. Meso- and metanotum with very long bristles on the posterior margins. Tergites and sternites densely covered with short hairs on the surface. Fore tibia (Fig. 4C) moderately inflated and covered with short hairs and long bristles.

Dehiscent organs present, visible in most individuals. Gut (Fig. 6C) with short mixed segment, P1 of uniform width along the entire length. Enteric valve seating (EVS) strongly trilobed, with two lobes clearly visible on the right side of the abdomen; armature with six mildly sclerotized and heterogeneous crown-shaped cushions, with thorns on the distal tip of the cushions, three cushions are slightly larger and are interspersed with the smaller ones. One or occasionally two cushions with 1–6 thorns and five or four cushions with 8–13 spines; cushions elongated and inflated with 20–30 large fringed polygons scales; cuticle between cushions with 12–20 scales similar to those of the cushions; smaller scales with 6–15 unsclerotized points grouped at the base of the cushions (Fig. 9D–F).

Remarks

See remarks for the genus.

Ecology and distribution

This species is distributed from Bolivia to French Guiana. Krecekitermes was found in Amazonian and Pacific Forest (Fig. 13). Previous studies have reported this species as a morphospecies: Anoplotermes-group sp JU in Ecuador (Dahlsjö et al. 2020), Anoplotermes-group sp C in French Guiana (Bourguignon et al. 2009, 2011a, b, 2013, 2015), and Apicotermitinae sp. 3 in Colombia (Castro et al. 2021). With the records of these studies and our field notes, we conclude that this is an abundant species. In Bourguignon et al. (2011a), this is the species with the fourth highest occurrence among Apicotermitinae, collected in all sampling sites. In Castro et al. (2021), this is one of the Apicotermitinae species with the highest occurrence in plantations. Besides, Krecekitermes is a species that is found in natural and secondary forests with high occurrence, being found in young and mature rubber plantations and in recovering soils. This species was usually collected from the soil underneath stones and other surface objects.

Etymology

This species is named in honor of the late Dairon Cárdenas (1957–2022), a Colombian botanist, co-founder of the Colombian Amazon Herbarium COAH of the SINCHI institute, who greatly contributed to the knowledge of the Amazon plants.

Mangolditermes Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov.

Type species

Mangolditermes curveileum sp. nov.

Diagnosis

In the left view, P1 makes a curve dorsally. The enteric valve seating (EVS) is weakly trilobed. The EVA is unarmed and composed of six elongated and inflated cushions, with well-marked fringed pentagonal scales in the distal half of the cushions. On the proximal ends, each cushion has about 10–20 tiny triangulate spines.

Description

Imago. Unknown.

Worker (Fig. 3A, B, Table 2.) Fontanelle oval, with faint borders. Dorsal surface of head capsule slightly concave in lateral view. Antenna whitish, with 14 articles, 2<3≅4<5. Left mandible with apical tooth more prominent than M1+2; margin between M1+2 and apical tooth forming 75° angle; posterior margin of M1+2 nearly straight and long; molar process very acute, conspicuous dorsal view, and subequal to M3; molar prominence small. Right mandible with apical tooth much more prominent than M1; M1 with a very sharp point; M2 forming almost 90° angle, pointing backward; margin between M1 and M2 with a shallow incision, forming a wide slightly obtuse angle; molar plate reduced and concave (Fig. 5D). Gut (Fig. 7A) with small crop; mixed segment (MS) with a long, but not inflated, mesenteric tongue. In left view, P1 very long, S-shaped curve from the crop side to P3; enteric valve seating slightly trilobed. Enteric valve unarmed (Fig. 10A–C), composed of six elongated and inflated cushions, with well-marked fringed pentagonal scales in the distal half of the cushions.

Figure 3. 

Head capsule of workers A, B Mangolditermes curveileum sp. nov. C, D Ourissotermes giblinorum sp. nov.

Comparison and remarks

Mangolditermes resembles Aparatermes, including the P1 shape, but can be distinguished by: 1) the mesenteric tongue (MT, mixed segment) morphology, that is elongated in the new genus and short in Aparatermes; 2) EVA with the pointed scales in the proximal portion of the cushions in Mangolditermes and towards the central portion of the cushion in Aparatermes; and 3) by the relatively inflated protibia of Mangolditermes. Mangolditermes has unarmed EVA, as Hydrecotermes and Rustitermes, but it can be separated from the latter two by its very long S-shaped P1 in left view. In ventral view, the mesenteric tongues of unarmed Anoplotermes have a whitish spherical mesenteric nodule, that is absent in Mangolditermes. Also, unarmed Anoplotermes have spatulate EVA cushions, while in Mangolditermes they are trapezoid and truncated at the base. Disjunctitermes can easily be confused with Mangolditermes; however, Mangolditermes is larger (WH max >0.75 mm) than Disjunctitermes (WH max < 0.7 mm); Mangolditermes EVA cushions are wider, while Disjunctitermes cushions are narrower, giving an elongated appearance. The cushions of the Disjunctitermes have very marked scales throughout the entire cushion, while in Mangolditermes the scales are only marked from the central to the anterior region of the cushion. Tonsuritermes is closely related to Mangolditermes, but Tonsuritermes workers have a very prominent fontanelle.

Molecular analysis

This genus was recovered as the sister group of Tonsuritermes, with which it forms the sister group of a large clade composed of Dissimulitermes, Disjunctitermes, Ourissotermes, Tetimatermes, Aparatermes, Compositermes, and Ruptitermes arboreus. The last four form a well-corroborated group, but all the others should be interpreted as a polytomy.

Etymology

We named this genus in honor of Dr. John Mangold, a retired American terminologist who collected and contributed to many Neotropical termite studies.

Mangolditermes curveileum Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, sp. nov.

Material examined

Holotype. Worker from lot MZUSP 17079** (in a separate vial with the remaining sample).

Type locality

Brazil. Rondônia, Porto Velho, Abunã, -9.6089, -65.3769.

Type repository

MZUSP

Paratypes. Bolivia. Santa Cruz, Ñuflo de Chaves, (-16.4935, -62.6529), 28.MAY.2013, 299 m, TF Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, JR Mangold, A Mullins, J Křeček, T Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC BO345). Brazil. Goiás, Arenópolis, (-16.3013, -51.4489), 21.JUL.2015, JP Constantini coll. (MZUSP 25623**); RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 23858**). Mato Grosso do Sul, Sonora, 23.JUL.2015, JP Constantini coll. (MZUSP 24047**). Rondônia, Porto Velho, (-9.0245, -64.2531), 7.JAN.2011, 84 m, RG Santos and CY Mandai coll. (MZUSP 17095, 17096); Porto Velho, Abunã, (-9.6321, -65.4387), 18.MAY.2010, 99 m, TF Carrijo and MM Rocha coll. (MZUSP 17101); (-9.6422, -65.4463), 28.JUN.2010, 105 m, TF Carrijo and SP Rosa coll. (MZUSP 17105, 17106); 10.MAR.2010, 105 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13043); (-9.6089, -65.3769), 11.JAN.2012, 103 m, RG Santos and JP Constantini coll. (MZUSP 17079**); (-9.6341, -65.4513), 11.MAR.2010, 123 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 13047); Porto Velho, Jaci Paraná, (-9.1519, -64.5019), 15.JAN.2011, 89 m, RG Santos and CY Mandai coll. (MZUSP 17093, 17094); Porto Velho, Mutum-Paraná, (-9.5791, -65.0579), 3.APR.2011, 136 m, VTC Mercado and RS Probst coll. (MZUSP 17114, 17115); (-9.5824, -65.0687), 24.JUN.2012, 250 m, RG Santos and K Kawamishi coll. (MZUSP 17090). Roraima, Amajari, (3.6493, -61.7055), 13.MAR.2016, JP Constantini coll. (MZUSP 25247**). Colombia. Caquetá, Belén de los Andaquíes, (1.6278, -75.9047), 28.JAN.2017, 875 m, D Castro coll. (CATAC-0933, UNAB 6136); El Porvenir, (1.4758, -75.8677), 27.NOV.2018, 513 m, M Pérez coll. (CATAC-4164, CATAC-4170); Florencia, Bajo Caldas, (1.6482, -75.6361), 12.DEC.2018, 428 m, M Pérez coll. (CATAC-4700); Vaupés, Mitú, (1.2236, -70.1569), 28.MAR.2019, 183 m, CP Peña coll. (CATAC-9640). French Guiana. Cayenne, Sinnamary, Petit Saut road (5.0676, -52.9798), 13–18.FEB.2008, T Bourguignon coll. (ULB Qua5-4.3a); Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni, Saül, Monts la Fumée (3.6369, -53.2042), 30.MAY.2018, 260 m, Y Roisin, S Hellemans, N Kaczmarek coll. (ULB G18-178). Paraguay. Amambay, San Vicente, (-22.7078, -56.2882), 28–29.MAY.2012, 219 m, JA Chase, R Hickman, J Křeček, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PA308, PA.309, PA312.1); (-22.6836, -56.2147), 29.MAY.2012, 225 m, JA Chase, R Hickman, J Křeček, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PA393); Caaguazú, San José de los Arroyos, (-25.5085, -56.7896), 27.MAY.2012, 124 m, JA Chase, R Hickman, J Křeček, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PA106); Cordillera, Ruta Nueva Colombia-Loma Grande, (-25.1747, -57.2876), 5.JUN.2012, 114 m, JA Chase, R Hickman, J Křeček, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PA1268). Perú. Ucayali, Coronel Portillo, Campoverde, (-8.6085, -74.9362), 28.MAY.14, 186 m, T Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, J Křeček, E Kuswanto, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, T. Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PU515, PU520); (-8.4886, -74.8584), 29.MAY.2014, 214 m, T Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, J Křeček, E Kuswanto, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, T. Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PU667, PU668); (-8.5018, -74.8462), 29.MAY.2014, 213 m, T Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, J Křeček, E Kuswanto, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, T. Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PU695, PU701, PU703, PU709.1); Nueva Requena, (-8.3700, -74.8436), 29.MAY.14, 185 m, T Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, J Křeček, E Kuswanto, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, T. Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PU595, PU596). Trinidad and Tobago. Tunapuna-Piarco, Blanchisseuse, (10.7963, -61.2826), 26.MAY.2003, 45 m, JA Chase, J Křeček, B Maharajh, JR Mangold, RH Scheffrahn, and J Warner coll. (UFTC TT1324**); Sangre Grande, Mount Harris Forest, (10.4861, -61.1278), 31.MAY.2003, 114 m, JA Chase, J Křeček, B Maharajh, JR Mangold, RH Scheffrahn, and J Warner coll. (UFTC TT2080, TT2089).

Diagnosis

As described for the genus.

Description

Imago. Unknown.

Worker (Fig. 3A, B, Table 2.) Monomorphic. Medium to large-size. Head capsule pale yellowish. Head, anteclypeus, and postclypeus covered with numerous bristles of variable size. Postclypeus moderately inflated. Pronotum with short stiff bristles on anterior margin; surface covered with long bristles. Posterior margins of pro-, meso-, and metanotum with long bristles. Fore femur with a few medium-sized bristles. Fore tibia (Fig. 4D) moderately inflated and densely covered with numerous longer and shorter bristles.

Figure 4. 

Foreleg of workers A Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. B Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov. C Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov. D Mangolditermes curveileum sp. nov. E Ourissotermes giblinorum sp. nov.

Gut (Fig. 7A) with mixed segment (MS) in left view, P1 very long, S-shaped curve from crop side to P3; EVAS slightly trilobed. Enteric valve unarmed (Fig. 10A–C), consisting of six inflated trapezoidal cushions; EVA with 18–25 well-marked cuboidal and fringed scales arranged in rows composed of 3–5 scales each; scales visible only in the distal half of the cushion; each cushion has about 10–20 tiny triangulate spines on the proximal end. Cuticle between the cushions without sculpture.

Remarks

See remarks for the genus.

Ecology and distribution

This species is widely distributed in South America and the Caribbean region. It is present from Paraguay to Trinidad and Tobago. It is also recorded from the Amazonian, Cerrado, and Chaco forests (Paraguay) (Fig. 13). This species was recorded as Anoplotermes-group sp AR by Bourguignon et al. (2011a). Collected mainly in the ground and foraging on highly decomposed pieces of wood.

Etymology

The epithet curveileum is a compound noun formed from the words curved and ileum in reference to the curved P1 (the ileum), visible in the left view of the digestive tract.

Ourissotermes Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, gen. nov.

Type species

Ourissotermes giblinorum sp. nov.

Diagnosis

Enteric valve armature composed of six pectinate bunches with 4–6 rows of spines, distal portion (proximal to P3) with longer spines, decreasing posteriorly; smaller spines tooth-like. Proximal portion of cushions with a small spine tooth-like (near P1). Enteric valve (EV) inserted directly into the paunch (P3), without an enteric valve seating (EVS) differentiated.

Description

Imago. (Fig. 1G, H) Head slightly concave upwards the ocelli. Fontanelle very small or inconspicuous. Eye and ocelli subcircular. Antenna with 15 articles (formula 2>3<4<5<6). Lateral margin of pronotum elongated and well rounded.

Worker. (Fig. 3C, D) Dorsal surface of the head capsule slightly convex anteriorly in lateral view. Postclypeus highly inflated. Antenna with 14 articles. Left mandible with apical tooth more prominent than M1+2; edges of M3 forming a triangle with an obtuse angle and a slightly truncated tip; molar prominence well developed, partially hiding the molar process; right mandible with apical tooth more prominent than M1; M2 triangular, forming an acute angle with a prominent tip, but slightly less prominent than M1 (Fig. 5E). Gut (Fig. 7B) with a small mesenteric tongue and a simple transverse junction between P1 and the mesenteron; EVS not conspicuous. EVA composed of six pectinate bunches with 4–6 rows of spines, distal portion (proximal to P3) with longer spines, decreasing posteriorly.

Figure 5. 

Mandibles of workers A Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. B Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov. C Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov. D Mangolditermes curveileum sp. nov. E, Ourissotermes giblinorum sp.nov. Arrow indicates the molar process.

Figure 6. 

Worker digestive tracts. From left to right: ventral, right, dorsal, and left views A Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. B Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov. C Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov. Abbreviations: C = crop, DO = Dehiscent organ, MS = mesenteron, MT = mesenteric tongue (mixed segment), P1 = ileum, EVS = enteric valve seating, P3 and P3b = paunch, P4 = colon, P5 = rectum.

Figure 7. 

Worker digestive tracts A Mangolditermes curveileum sp. nov. B Ourissotermes giblinorum sp. nov. From left to right: ventral, right, dorsal, and left views. Abbreviations: DO = dehiscent organ, C = crop, MS = mesenteron, MT = mesenteric tongue (mixed segment), P1 = ileum, EVS = enteric valve seating, P3 and P3b = paunch, P4 = colon, P5 = rectum.

Comparison and remarks

Enteric valve armature of Ourissotermes is similar to Patawatermes, and Echinotermes EVA, but Ourissotermes can be easily differentiated because EVA is inserted directly in P3, without an EVS extension, while Patawatermes EVS is a tubular extension clearly visible externally; Echinotermes present a trilobed EVS. Ourissotermes present a digestive tract external morphology similar to that of Hydrecotermes; however, the EVA of Hydrecotermes is unarmed.

Molecular analysis

This genus was recovered as part of a big clade composed of Dissimulitermes, Disjunctitermes, Tonsuritermes, Mangolditermes, Tetimatermes, Aparatermes, Compositermes, and the species Ruptitermes arboreus. The last four form a well-corroborated group, but all the others should be interpreted as a polytomy.

Etymology

The species name is due to the resemblance of the EV armature with the body spines of a sea ​​urchin, that the translation to Portuguese is “ouriço”.

Ourissotermes giblinorum Scheffrahn, Carrijo & Castro, sp. nov.

Material examined

Holotype. Worker from lot MZUSP 17967 (in a separate vial with the remaining sample).

Type locality

Brazil. Rondônia, Porto Velho, Jaci-Paraná, -9.4526, -64.3900.

Type repository

MZUSP

Paratypes. Bolivia. Cochabamba, Chapare, Villa Tunari, (-17.0024, -65.4356), 26.MAY.2013, 332 m, TF Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, JR Mangold, A Mullins, J Křeček, T Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC BO118, BO127, BO153); Cristal Mayu, (-16.9993, -65.6273), 26.MAY.2013, 504 m, TF Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, JR Mangold, A Mullins, J Křeček, T Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC BO167). Brazil. Goiás, Nazário, (-16.5904, -50.2291), 27.JUL.2015, TF Carrijo coll. (MZUSP 25404**); Minas Gerais, Presidente Olegário, (-18.3143, -46.5273), 18.JUL.2015, TF Carrijo coll. (MZUSP 25391**); Paraíba, João Pessoa, Mata do Buraquinho, (-7.1480, -34.8614), 01–20.JUN.2000, 63 m, A Vasconcellos coll. (MZUSP 13496); Rondônia, Porto Velho, Jaci Paraná, (-9.4526, -64.3900), 25.NOV.2011, 122 m, MM Rocha and J Cabral coll. (MZUSP 17967); Porto Velho, Nova Mutum Paraná, (-9.3176, -64.7269), 18.SEP.2010, 188 m, TF Carrijo and RG Santos coll. (MZUSP 17952**); Porto Velho, Mutum-Paraná, (-9.5823, -65.0686), 13.MAY.2010, 250 m, TF Carrijo and MM Rocha coll. (MZUSP 17949). Colombia. Vaupés, Mitú, Comunidad de Piracemo, (1.3375, -70.3889), 27.MAR.2019, 181 m, CP Peña coll. (CATAC-9447). FRENCH GUIANA. Cayenne, Sinnamary, Petit Saut road, (5.07388, -52.97933), 03.JUN.2016, 94 m, Y Roisin, JE Romero Arias, S Hellemans coll. (ULB G16-127); (5.11085, -52.96535), FEB.2019, 78 m, Y Roisin, C Legrand, P Babczenko, N Kaczmarek coll. (ULB L02-10F**); Régina, Nouragues Inselberg Station, (4.0833, -52.6815), 16.JAN.2010, T Bourguignon, Y Roisin, J Šobotník, R. Hanus, J Cvačka coll. (ULB G627). PERU, Ucayali, Nueva Requena, (-8.3700, -74.8436), 29.MAY.2014, 185 m, T Carrijo, JA Chase, R Constantino, J Křeček, E Kuswanto, JR Mangold, A. Mullins, T. Nishimura, and RH Scheffrahn coll. (UFTC PU611).

Diagnosis

As described for the genus.

Description

Imago. (Fig. 1G, H) Head capsule, nota, and wing scales reddish-brown, with the head slightly darker. Head capsule with many bristles, densely covered by short hairs. Postclypeus slightly swollen, with a thin median suture. Anteclypeus elongated and wide, with rounded sides and medium portion. Pronotum with few short bristles in the margins. Meso- and metathorax covered with numerous hairs.

Worker. (Fig. 3C, D) Medium-size. Monomorphic. Head capsule pale yellowish, with a faint fontanelle; antennal articles whitish. Head capsule covered with numerous medium-size bristles and sparse long setae. Pronotum with long bristles in the margins. Tergites and sternites with short hairs on the surface and long bristles in the margins. Fore tibia (Fig. 4E) moderately inflated and thickly covered with bristles of the same size, with sparse long-size bristles; pilosity denser apically with thicker spine-like bristles close to the tarsal region.

Gut (Fig. 7B) with a P1 of uniform width along the entire length, inserted directly into P3, making EVS not conspicuous. Each of six EV cushions armed with complex distal rake of sclerotized spines; rakes composed of 4–6 rows of pectinate spines, the posterior rows with 8–15 spines, and the anterior rows with 1–5 spines. Cushions pyriform, each with pentagonal and hexagonal scales; scales near the middle with small spine directed upwards; spines more noticeable near the distal portion; each cushion with a small spine directed proximally (Fig. 10D–F).

Figure 8. 

Worker enteric valve of Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. A, B sliced mount C enteric valve seating filled with bacteria located on “bacterial slime”. Locations of enteric valve cushions (P2) and “star-like” plaque at the junction of P1 and P3 are diagrammed D whole mount. Scale bars: 100 μm.

Figure 9. 

Worker enteric valves A–C Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov. from Colombia (UNAB 6137), Venezuela (UFTC VZ363), and Bolivia (UFTC BO532) D–F Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov. from Brazil (MZUSP 17402), Colombia (CATAC 8308), and Bolivia (UFTC BO84). Scale bars: 100 μm.

Figure 10. 

Worker enteric valves A–D Mangolditermes curveileum sp. nov. from French Guiana (G18-178), Peru (UFTC PU520 and PU703), and Brazil (MZUSP 17114) E–H Ourissotermes giblinorum sp. nov. from Brazil (MZUSP 17967), Colombia (CATAC 9447), Bolivia (UFTC BO167), and French Guiana (G16-127). Scale bars: 100 μm.

Figure 11. 

Apicotermitinae worker enteric valves A Hydrecotermes arienesho B Hydrecotermes kawaii C Humutermes noiroti D Anoplotermes banksi E Anoplotermes meridianus F Anoplotermes janus G Anoplotermes parvus H Longustitermes manni I Patawatermes nigripunctatus J Patawatermes turricola K Rubeotermes jheringi L Grigiotermes hageni. Scale bars: 100 μm.

Remarks

See remarks for the genus.

Ecology and distribution

This species was mainly collected from soil and decomposing wood pieces. It was found mainly in Amazon and Atlantic primary forests with a high state of conservation, at sites below 504 m a.s.l. This species was recorded as Anoplotermes-group sp. T in Bourguignon et al. (2009, 2011a, b, 2013, 2015).

Etymology

This species is named in honor of Dr. Robin M. Giblin-Davis and his son Sean Giblin. From 1985 to 2020, “Rob” was a former colleague of RHS at the University of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale R.E.C., until his retirement. He taught RHS to appreciate nematodes in termites. For many years, Sean cleaned debris from thousands of termite vials upon the return of collection expeditions by RHS and colleagues listed in the “materials examined” section herein for UFTC samples. A complete listing of expeditions is available at Scheffrahn (2019).

Key to neotropical Apicotermitinae genera based on the worker caste

Be aware before using this key: Many soldierless termite genera remain undescribed and are not included in this key. So, if your sample does not fit in any genus here, do not try to force a name to it. Using the EVA to confirm the identification is always recommended.

1 Fontanelle large, sunken, diameter one quarter to three quarters head width. [see Constantini et al. (2018)] Tonsuritermes
Fontanelle smaller, diameter less than one quarter head width. (Figs 2B, D, F, 3B, D) 2
2 Fore tibia with long “scooped out” excavation [see Fontes (1986)] Tetimatermes
Fore tibia without long “scooped out” excavation 3
3 Enteric valve inserted directly in P3 (EVS not conspicuous in intact gut), P3 without tubular extension to P1 (Fig. 7B) 4
Enteric valve seating visible in intact gut (Figs 6A–C, 7A) 5
4 Enteric valve armed (Fig. 10D–F) Ourissotermes gen. nov.
Enteric valve unarmed (Fig. 11A, B) Hydrecotermes
5 Junction of EVS/P3 with ring of 15–20 pectinate paddles [see Scheffrahn (2013), and (Carrijo et al. 2015)] Compositermes
Junction of EVS/P3 without ring of 15–20 pectinate paddles 6
6 Mesenteric tongue (MS/P1 junction) with a whitish spherical mesenteric nodule in ventral view (Fig. 6A) 7
Mesenteric tongue without a nodule in ventral view (Figs 6B, C, 7A, B) 8
7 Enteric valve armature consists of six palmate pads (Fig. 11C) Humutermes
Enteric valve armature with one to three sclerotized pads or enteric valve unarmed (Figs 8, 11D–G) Anoplotermes
8 Dehiscent organs present (Fig. 6C) 9
Dehiscent organs absent (Fig. 6A, B) 11
9 Enteric valve unarmed; workers head pale yellow to black [See Acioli and Constantino (2015)] Ruptitermes ***
Enteric valve armed; workers head whitish to pale yellow 10
10 Enteric valve seating tubular, EVA armature pads with more than 20 spines [see Constantini et al. (2020)] Dissimulitermes
Enteric valve seating trilobed (Fig. 6C), EVA armature pads with less than 13 spines (Fig. 8D–F) Krecekitermes gen. nov.
11 Enteric valve unarmed 12
Enteric valve armed 15
12 Mesenteric tongue spheroidal or elongated (Fig. 7A) 13
Mesenteric tongue short (drop shaped), not spheroidal (Fig. 6B, C) 14
13 Cushion scales are only marked from the central to the anterior portion of the cushion (Fig. 10A–C); larger, max head width > 0.7 mm Mangolditermes gen. nov.
Cushion scales markedly throughout the entire cushion [see Scheffrahn et al. (2017)]; smaller WH max < 0.7 mm Disjunctitermes
14 EVA Cuticle between cushions with scales; EVS not trilobed [see Castro et al. (2020)] Rustitermes
EVA Cuticle between cushions without scales; EVS trilobed [see Pinzón et al. (2019)] Aparatermes
15 EVA armature resembling a continuous (spines on cuticle between cushions) wreath of hundreds of tiny and thin spines (Figs 9A–C, 11H) 16
EVA armature in form of comb, pads, or sclerotized plates on EVA cushions, not continuous on cuticle between cushions 17
16 Enteric valve seating tubular (Fig. 6B) Hirsutitermes gen. nov.
Enteric valve seating trilobed (Fig. 6C; see Bourguignon et al. 2010) Longustitermes
17 EVA armature sclerotized plates, pads or comb present only in five cushions (Fig. 11K) Rubeotermes
EVAA sclerotized plates, pads or comb present in all the six cushions 18
18 Enteric valve seating tubular (Fig. 6B) 19
Enteric valve seating trilobed (Fig. 6C) 20
19 Distal end of EVA armature pads capped with even tuft of spines; EVS elongated [Fig. 11I, J, see Bourguignon et al. (2016a)] Patawatermes
Distal end of EVA armature pads ringed by unevenly arranged spines; EVS short [Fig. 11L, see Bourguignon et al. (2016a)] Grigiotermes
20 EVA armature pads spiny, spherical [see Castro et al. (2018)] Echinotermes
EVA armature pads raspy, truncated [see Bourguignon et al. (2016a)] Amplucrutermes

Discussion

The systematic and taxonomic delineation of Neotropical soldierless termites has been implemented by various methods (Bourguignon et al. 2013). For example, molecular phylogenetics and DNA barcoding allow the separation of morphologically cryptic taxa, but low branch supports for larger clades make phylogenetic reconstructions uncertain (Bourguignon et al. 2010, 2016b, Scheffrahn et al. 2017, Castro et al. 2018, 2020). Here, we provided a mitogenome phylogeny including most genera of Neotropical Apicotermitinae. Both our analyses (ML and BI) recovered the Neotropical Apicotermitinae as a well-supported monophyletic group (Fig. 12 and Suppl. material 2). The results of both analyses were similar, with the most notable exception being the position of Hirsutitermes gen. nov., Rubeotermes, and Ruptitermes. The new genus Hirsutitermes was recovered as the sister group of a clade composed of Krecekitermes and Anoplotermes in the BI (Fig. 12), but as the sister group to all New World Apicotermitinae in the ML (Suppl. material 2). In the BI, a clade composed by Rubeotermes and Ruptitermes was recovered as sister group to all New World Apicotermitinae (Fig. 12), while in the ML, these two genera were not recovered as a clade, with Rubeotermes as sister group to Rustitermes, and Ruptitermes close related to a clade composed of Grigiotermes, Patawatermes and Hydrecotermes. With our data, no conclusions can be made regarding the relationship of these groups.

Figure 12. 

Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the New World Apicotermitinae using the complete mitogenome. New taxa are highlighted, and outgroups are not shown. Branch support is posterior probability.

Figure 13. 

Distribution maps of the new species described in this study (lit.= literature record).

A few groups showed high branch support values and deserve a note. The genera Grigiotermes and Patawatermes (originally described as Grigiotermes) form a clade and share many morphological characters. If future analysis corroborates the results found here, reverting the Patawatermes species to the genus Grigiotermes may be a parsimonious taxonomic decision. A group composed of Compositermes, Aparatermes, Tetimatermes, and the species Ruptitermes arboreus seems to be a very consistent group, despite the lack of morphological synapomorphies, this clade was also recovered in recent works using the COI gene (e.g., Pinzón et al. 2019; Castro et al. 2020).

Remarkable diagnostic morphological characters in New World Apicotermitinae occur in a few genera (e.g., Compositermes, Tonsuritermes, Tetimatermes), but there is a lack of remarkable diagnostic characters for differentiating other genera. For example, Anoplotermes and Humutermes share a similar digestive tract, and these genera can only be supported by molecular data. This difficulty becomes even clearer in our phylogeny, where the species Anoplotermes meridianus clustered with Humutermes, making Anoplotermes paraphyletic. In addition, the new species Anoplotermes susanae sp. nov. clustered with the Anoplotermes “stricto sensu”, but with low branch support. Using the barcode gene COI alone (unpublished data), this species was first hypothesized as a new genus. The inclusion of more genetic data, such as nuclear genes, will be important to corroborate our results here. Likewise, we emphasize the large number of species whose type material was not yet examined in recent studies, and synonyms can be generated in the future.

Another critical challenge occurs within species with unarmed EVA, where the characters are even more inconspicuous, making species identification more difficult. In this study, we identified morphospecies records from pictures from other studies (Bourguignon et al. 2013; Dahlsjö et al. 2020; Castro et al. 2021) for the species A. susanae sp. nov., Hirsutitermes kanzakii sp. nov., and Krecekitermes daironi sp. nov., but not for M. curveileum sp. nov., even though this was the species with the highest reported distribution. This species may have already been reported, but available EVA photographs generally do not show the cushions in great detail, or they are covered with muscular tissue that makes the internal structures difficult to see; while the well-sclerotized armature can be seen even with muscle tissue involved (Bourguignon et al. 2013; Dahlsjö et al. 2020). The identification of species using the enteric valve morphology is crucial for the reliable identification of soldierless termites, as has been done in ecological studies (Dahlsjö et al. 2020; Castro et al. 2021). However, the photographic material and description of some species do not seem to be optimal, preventing comparisons (Bourguignon et al. 2016b). The addition of diagnostic characters such as enteric valve seating (EVS), would have been able to avoid this misidentification; or the better appreciation of the scales forms on the cushions could have helped to discriminate these species, but unfortunately this character is not possible to see clearly in the Patawatermes original description.

Despite the large number of descriptions of new taxa of soldierless termites from the Neotropics in the last decade (Bourguignon et al. 2010, 2016a; Carrijo et al. 2015; Scheffrahn et al. 2017; Castro et al. 2018, 2020; Constantini et al. 2018, 2020; Pinzón et al. 2019), ecological studies still show the existence of an enormous taxonomic-gap within the Neotropical soldierless termites. These studies always present their species list with most of Apicotermitinae only as morphotypes, either for the lack of identification skills or the large number of new taxa yet to be described (Casalla and Korb 2019; da Silva et al. 2019; Dahlsjö et al. 2020; Duran-Bautista et al. 2020a, b; De Azevedo et al. 2021; Cunha et al. 2021). Although it could be assumed that the description of new taxa could be geographically limited, as evidenced for other Neotropical termites (Constantino et al. 2006; Rocha and Cancello 2009; Rocha et al. 2012; Carrijo et al. 2020), a large number of soldierless taxa have a wide distribution and high abundance, such as Humutermes spp, Hydrecotermes spp, Patawatermes spp, Disjunctitermes insularis, Grigiotermes hageni, Rustitermes boteroi, and Rubeotermes jheringi (Bourguignon et al. 2016b, Scheffrahn et al. 2017; Castro et al. 2020). In addition, species such as Patawatermes turricola, Disjunctitermes insularis, and Rustitermes boteroi have been identified as indicators in degraded soils of Andean-Amazon piedmont, where they are abundant (Castro et al. 2021), highlighting the role of these termites in soil recovery and other ecosystem services.

The soldierless termites present not only a taxonomic gap (Linnean shortfall), but also a geographical gap (Wallacean shortfall) (Whittaker et al. 2005; Bini et al. 2006). Since most samples from museums and collections are yet to be studied and there is a lack of inventories in many areas, the geographic gap for these termites is even greater than for other groups. This is also true in the other parts of the world, where the taxonomic gap is not so deep because of the older available literature (Grassé and Noirot 1954; Sands 1972), but the geographical gap still exists due the lack of researchers for a long period (Romero Arias et al. 2021).

The key that we provide can serve as a support tool for the confirmation of identification of genera that are already described; however, as we discuss here, there is many species not yet described. It is expected that progress in the description of soldierless taxa will highlight the importance of these groups in ecological studies and once ecological studies start naming the soldierless termites, the Wallacean shortfall of these termites will also diminish.

Acknowledgments

DC thanks to Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI and to Dr. Clara Peña-Venegas for financing and logistics support in CATAC collection.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was partially funded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) through the grants #2020/06041-4 (TFC) and #2014/11982-1 (JPC). YR received support from the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS, grant J.0180.20). EMC received support from the Conselho Nacional de desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq Proc. Nr. 308408/2019-5).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: RS, TFC, DC. Data curation: YR, TFC, RS, TB, JC, DC, MW. Formal analysis: MW, JC, TFC, DC, RS, EMC. Funding acquisition: YR, TFC, EMC, TB. Investigation: TFC, MW, DC, JC, RS. Methodology: DC, TFC, RS, JC, EMC. Software: DC, TFC, MW. Visualization: MW, TFC, RS, JC, DC, TB. Writing – original draft: TFC, RS, DC. Writing – review and editing: YR, EMC, MW, RS, DC, TFC, TB, JC.

Author ORCIDs

Tiago F. Carrijo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-7252

Daniel Castro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5060-6129

Menglin Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2206-9503

Joice P. Constantini https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1813-9276

Thomas Bourguignon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-8977

Eliana M. Cancello https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-6335

Yves Roisin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-3552

Rudolf H. Scheffrahn https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6191-5963

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Acioli ANS, Constantino R (2015) A taxonomic revision of the neotropical termite genus Ruptitermes (Isoptera, Termitidae, Apicotermitinae). Zootaxa 4032(5): 451–492. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4032.5.1
  • Barros E, Grimaldi M, Sarrazin M, Chauvel A, Mitja D, Desjardins T, Lavelle P (2004) Soil physical degradation and changes in macrofaunal communities in Central Amazon. Applied Soil Ecology 26(2): 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.012
  • Bini LM, Diniz-Filho JAF, Rangel TFLVB, Bastos RP, Pinto MP (2006) Challenging Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls: Knowledge gradients and conservation planning in a biodiversity hotspot. Diversity & Distributions 12(5): 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00286.x
  • Bourguignon T, Sobotník J, Lepoint G, Martin JM, Roisin Y (2009) Niche differentiation among neotropical soldierless soil-feeding termites revealed by stable isotope ratios. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41(10): 2038–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.07.005
  • Bourguignon T, Scheffrahn RH, Krecek J, Nagy ZT, Sonet G, Roisin Y, Křeček J, Nagy ZT, Sonet G, Roisin Y (2010) Towards a revision of the Neotropical soldierless termites (Isoptera:Termitidae): redescription of the genus Anoplotermes and description of Longustitermes, gen. nov. Invertebrate Systematics 24(4): 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS10012
  • Bourguignon T, Šobotník J, Lepoint G, Martin JM, Hardy OJ, Dejean A, Roisin Y (2011b) Feeding ecology and phylogenetic structure of a complex neotropical termite assemblage, revealed by nitrogen stable isotope ratios. Ecological Entomology 36(2): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01265.x
  • Bourguignon T, Šobotník J, Hanus R, Krasulová J, Vrkoslav V, Cvačka J, Roisin Y (2013) Delineating species boundaries using an iterative taxonomic approach: The case of soldierless termites (Isoptera, Termitidae, Apicotermitinae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69(3): 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.007
  • Bourguignon T, Sobotnik J, Dahlsjo CAL, Roisin Y (2016a) The soldierless Apicotermitinae: Insights into a poorly known and ecologically dominant tropical taxon. Insectes Sociaux 63(1): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-015-0446-y
  • Bourguignon T, Scheffrahn RH, Nagy ZT, Sonet G, Host B, Roisin Y (2016b) Towards a revision of the Neotropical soldierless termites (Isoptera: Termitidae): Redescription of the genus Grigiotermes Mathews and description of five new genera. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 176(1): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12305
  • Bucek A, Šobotník J, He S, Shi M, McMahon DP, Holmes EC, Roisin Y, Lo N, Bourguignon T (2019) Evolution of termite symbiosis informed by transcriptome-based phylogenies. Current Biology 29(21): 3728–3734.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.08.076
  • Carrijo TF, Brandão D, Oliveira DE, Costa DA, Santos T (2009) Effects of pasture implantation on the termite (Isoptera) fauna in the Central Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado). Journal of Insect Conservation 13(6): 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9205-y
  • Carrijo TF, Scheffrahn RH, Křeček J (2015) Compositermes bani sp.n. (Isoptera, Termitidae, Apicotermitinae), a new species of soldierless termite from Bolivia. Zootaxa 3941(2): 294–298. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3941.2.10
  • Carrijo TF, Pontes-Nogueira M, Santos RG, Morales AC, Cancello EM, Scheffrahn RH (2020) New World Heterotermes (Isoptera, Rhinotermitidae): Molecular phylogeny, biogeography and description of a new species. Systematic Entomology 45(3): 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12412
  • Casalla R, Korb J (2019) Termite diversity in Neotropical dry forests of Colombia and the potential role of rainfall in structuring termite diversity. Biotropica 51(2): 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12626
  • Castro D, Scheffrahn RH, Carrijo TF (2018) Echinotermes biriba, a new genus and species of soldierless termite from the Colombian and Peruvian Amazon (Termitidae, Apicotermitinae). ZooKeys 748: 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.748.24253
  • Castro D, Constantini JP, Scheffrahn RH, Carrijo TF, Cancello EM (2020) Rustitermes boteroi, a new genus and species of soldierless termites (Blattodea, Isoptera, Apicotermitinae) from South America. ZooKeys 922: 35–49. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.922.47347
  • Castro D, Carrijo TF, Serna FJ, Peña-Venegas CP (2021) Can rubber crop systems recover termite diversity in previously degraded pastures in the Colombian Amazon region? Neotropical Entomology 50(6): 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-021-00905-y
  • Constantini JP, Carrijo TF, Palma-Onetto V, Scheffrahn R, Carnohan LP, Šobotník J, Cancello EM (2018) Tonsuritermes, a new soldierless termite genus and two new species from South America (Blattaria: Isoptera: Termitidae: Apicotermitinae). Zootaxa 4531(3): e383. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4531.3.4
  • Constantini J, Janei V, Costa-Leonardo AM, Cancello EM (2020) Dissimulitermes, a new soldierless termite genus (Blattaria: Isoptera: Termitidae: Apicotermitinae) from the Neotropics and the histology of its dehiscent organ. Insect Systematics & Evolution 52(4): 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-bja10014
  • Constantino R, Acioli ANS, Schmidt K, Cuezzo C, Carvalho SHC, Vasconcellos A (2006) A taxonomic revision of the Neotropical termite genera Labiotermes Holmgren and Paracornitermes Emerson (Isoptera: Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae). Zootaxa 1340(1): 1–44. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1340.1.1
  • Cunha HF, Costa DA, Silva APT, Nicacio J, Abot AR (2021) Termite functional diversity along an elevational gradient in the Cerrado of Mato Grosso do Sul. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 41: 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-020-00240-6
  • da Silva IS, Vasconcellos A, Moura FM da S (2019) Termite assemblages (Blattaria, isoptera) in two montane forest (brejo de altitude) areas in northeastern brazil. Biota Neotropica 19(1): e20180519. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0519
  • Dahlsjö CAL, Valladares Romero CS, Espinosa Iñiguez CI (2020) Termite diversity in Ecuador: A comparison of two primary forest national parks. Journal of Insect Science 20(1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iez129
  • De Azevedo RA, Santos QCL, Fluck IE, Rodrigues DJ, Battirola LD, Dambros CDS (2021) Selective logging does not alter termite response to soil gradients in Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 37(1): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467421000080
  • De Souza OFF, Brown VK (1994) Effects of habitat fagmentation on amazonian termite communities effects of habitat fragmentation on Amazonian termite communities. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10: 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400007847
  • Demetrio WC, Conrado AC, Acioli ANS, Casadei Ferreira A, Bartz MLC, James SW, da Silva E, Maia LS, Martins GC, Macedo RS, Stanton DWG, Lavelle P, Velasquez E, Zangerlé A, Barbosa R, Tapia‐Coral SC, Muniz AW, Santos A, Ferreira T, Segalla RF, Decaëns T, Nadolny HS, Peña‐Venegas CP, Maia CMBF, Pasini A, Mota AF, Taube Júnior PS, Silva TAC, Rebellato L, de Oliveira Júnior RC, Neves EG, Lima HP, Feitosa RM, Vidal Torrado P, McKey D, Clement CR, Shock MP, Teixeira WG, Motta ACV, Melo VF, Dieckow J, Garrastazu MC, Chubatsu LS, Kille P, Brown GG, Cunha L (2021) A “Dirty” Footprint: Macroinvertebrate diversity in Amazonian Anthropic Soils. Global Change Biology 00(19): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15752
  • Duran-Bautista EH, Muñoz Y, Galindo JD, Ortiz T, Bermúdez M (2020a) Soil physical quality and relationship to changes in termite community in northwestern Colombian Amazon. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8: e598134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.598134
  • Duran-Bautista EH, Armbrecht I, Acioli ANS, Suárez JC, Romero M, Quintero M, Lavelle P (2020b) Termites as indicators of soil ecosystem services in transformed amazon landscapes. Ecological Indicators 117: e106550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106550
  • Eggleton P (2011) An introduction to termites: Biology, taxonomy and functional morphology. In: Bignell D, Roisin Y, Lo N (Eds) Biology of termites: a modern synthesis. Springer Netherlands, 26 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3977-4_1
  • Eggleton P, Homathevi R, Jeeva D, Jones DT, Davies RG, Maryati M (1997) The species richness and composition of termites (Isoptera) in primary and regenerating lowland dipterocarp forest in Sabah, east Malaysia. Ecotropica 3: 119–128.
  • Fittkau EJ, Klinge H (1973) On biomass and trophic structure of the central Amazonian rain forest ecosystem. Biotropica 5(1): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989676
  • Fontes LR (1986) Two new genera of soldierless Apicotermitinae from the Neotropical region (Isoptera, Termitidae). Sociobiology 12: 285–297.
  • Grassé PP, Noirot C (1954) Apicotermes arquieri (Isoptère): Ses constructions, sa biologie. Considérations générales sur la sous-famille des Apicotermitinae nov. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Zoologie (11e série) 16: 345–388.
  • Jouquet P, Traoré S, Choosai C, Hartmann C, Bignell D (2011) Influence of termites on ecosystem functioning. Ecosystem services provided by termites. European Journal of Soil Biology 47(4): 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.05.005
  • Kaiser P (1953) Anoplotermes pacificus, eine mit Pflanzenwurzeln vergesellschaftet lebende Termite. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 52: 77–92.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Lavelle P, Rodríguez N, Arguello O, Bernal J, Botero C, Chaparro P, Gómez Y, Gutiérrez A, Hurtado M del P, Loaiza S, Pullido SX, Rodríguez E, Sanabria C, Velásquez E, Fonte SJ (2014) Soil ecosystem services and land use in the rapidly changing Orinoco River Basin of Colombia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 185: 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.020
  • Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating Maximum-Likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Noirot C (2001) The gut of termites (Isoptera) comparative anatomy, systematics, phylogeny. II. – Higher termites (Termitidae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S. ) 37: 431–471.
  • Pinzón OP, Scheffrahn RH, Carrijo TF (2019) Aparatermes thornatus (Isoptera: Termitidae: Apicotermitinae), a new species of soldierless termite from Northern Amazonia. Florida Entomologist 102: e141. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0123
  • Rocha MM, Cancello EM, Carrijo TF (2012) Neotropical termites: Revision of Armitermes Wasmann (Isoptera, Termitidae, Syntermitinae) and phylogeny of the Syntermitinae. Systematic Entomology 37(4): 793–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2012.00645.x
  • Rodríguez-León CH, Peña-Venegas CP, Sterling A, Castro D, Mahecha-Virguez LK, Virguez-Díaz YR, Silva-Olaya AM, Guerrero GG, Méndez A (2021) Soil quality restoration during the natural succession of abandoned cattle pastures in deforested landscapes in the Colombian Amazon. Agronomy 11(12): e2484. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122484
  • Romero-Arias J, Boom A, Wang M, Clitheroe C, Šobotník J, Stiblik P, Bourguignon T, Roisin Y (2021) Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of Apicotermitinae (Blattodea: Termitidae). Systematic Entomology 46(3): 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12486
  • Roonwal ML (1970) Measurements of termites (Isoptera) for taxonomic purposes. Journal of the Zoological Society of India 21: 9–66.
  • Sanabria C, Dubs F, Lavelle P, Fonte SJ, Barot S (2016) Influence of regions, land uses and soil properties on termite and ant communities in agricultural landscapes of the Colombian Llanos. European Journal of Soil Biology 74: 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.03.008
  • Sands WA (1972) The soldierless termites of Africa (Isoptera: Termitidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology Supplement 18: 1–224. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.192782
  • Scheffrahn RH (2013) Compositermes vindai (Isoptera: Termitidae: Apicotermitinae), a new genus and species of soldierless termite from the Neotropics. Zootaxa 3652(3): 381–391. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3652.3.6
  • Scheffrahn RH, Carrijo TF, Postle AC, Tonini F (2017) Disjunctitermes insularis, a new soldierless termite genus and species (Isoptera, Termitidae, Apicotermitinae) from Guadeloupe and Peru. ZooKeys 665: 71–84. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.665.11599
  • Suchard MA, Lemey P, Baele G, Ayres DL, Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2018) Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evolution 4(1): vey016. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vey016
  • Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44(W1): W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256

1The EVA of Ruptitermes bandeirai is armed with fewer than 13 spines; however, we hypothesize that this species belongs to another genus due its gut and EVA morphology (Acioli and Constantino 2015).

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Samples used in the phylogenetic analysis

Tiago F. Carrijo, Daniel Castro, Menglin Wang, Joice P. Constantini, Thomas Bourguignon, Eliana M. Cancello, Yves Roisin, Rudolf H. Scheffrahn

Data type: table (word document)

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (30.46 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree of the New World Apicotermitinae using the complete mitogenome

Tiago F. Carrijo, Daniel Castro, Menglin Wang, Joice P. Constantini, Thomas Bourguignon, Eliana M. Cancello, Yves Roisin, Rudolf H. Scheffrahn

Data type: figure (word document)

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (181.92 kb)
login to comment