2urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:45048D35-BB1D-5CE8-9668-537E44BD4C7Eurn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:91BD42D4-90F1-4B45-9350-EEF175B1727AZooKeysZK1313-29891313-2970Pensoft Publishers10.3897/zookeys.1071.7074370743Research ArticleDipteraNemestrinidaeSystematicsNorth AfricaA review of tangle-veined flies (Nemestrinidae, Diptera) in EgyptEl-HashashArafa Elsayedarafa.elhashash@yahoo.com12InvestigationBadrawyHaitham Badrawy Mousa3SupervisionIbrahimAyman Mohyie-Eldin1SupervisionDepartment of Taxonomy, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokki-Giza, EgyptDepartment of Taxonomy, Plant Protection Research InstituteDokki-GizaEgyptPlant Protection Department, Agricultural Faculty, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, RussiaPeoples’ Friendship UniversityMoscowRussiaDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Abbassia-Cairo, EgyptAin Shams UniversityAbbassia-CairoEgypt
202116112021107111424B0ACA61-B0AA-5E05-A9B3-4DA7215AC07AC91AFA18-87C8-444E-AB6C-85C747B3893B57227642706202108102021Arafa Elsayed El-Hashash, Haitham Badrawy Mousa Badrawy, Ayman Mohyie-Eldin IbrahimThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.http://zoobank.org/C91AFA18-87C8-444E-AB6C-85C747B3893B
The Egyptian fauna of the genus Nemestrinus Latreille, 1802 is revised. In 1967, Steyskal and El-Bialy listed 12 species from the region, but only six species are now recognized. The primary type specimens of the species N.aegyptiacus (Wiedemann, 1828), N.rufipes (Olivier, 1810), and N.lateralis Wiedemann, 1828 (N.lateralis being a synonym of N.rufipes) deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany were examined. Two species (N.abdominalis Olivier, 1811 and N.fascifrons (Bigot, 1888) are placed as new synonyms of N.ater (Olivier, 1811), and N.ruficornis Macquart, 1840 is synonymized with N.rufipes (Olivier, 1811). Nemestrinusjullieni (Efflatoun, 1925) is confirmed as a synonym of N.aegyptiacus. Furthermore, three species (N.caucasicus Fischer, 1806, N.pallipes (Olivier, 1811), and N.persicus Lichtwardt, 1909) have been removed and are doubtful records from Egypt. A key to the species, lists of specimens examined, and Illustrations and distributions for each species are provided. The status of species of doubtful occurrence in Egypt is discussed.
DistributionEgyptNemestrinustaxonomyCitation
El-Hashash AE, Badrawy HBM, Ibrahim AM-E (2021) A review of tangle-veined flies (Nemestrinidae, Diptera) in Egypt. ZooKeys 1071: 11–42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1071.70743
Introduction
Nemestrinidae (tangle-veined flies) are a small dipteran family belonging to the suborder Brachycera-Orthorrhapha and occur all over the world, but are most abundant and diverse in the Palaearctic, Australian and Afrotropical Regions (Richter 1997; Pape et al. 2011). The family is classified into five subfamilies and comprises approximately 300 species worldwide in 23 genera, while 77 species in eight genera are known from the Palaearctic region (Richter 1997; Narchuk 2007; Papavero and Bernardi 2009; Pape et al. 2011).
The Nemestrininae comprise ca. 175 species worldwide in six genera (Bernardi 1973; Papavero and Bernardi 2009). In the Palaearctic Region, the Nemestrininae currently include approximately 67 species in two genera (Nemestrinus Latreille, and Stenopteromyia Lichtwardt) according to the last published catalogue by Richter (1988).
The genus Nemestrinus was described by Latreille in 1802 based on specimens collected from Egypt and Syria. It comprises 66 species in the Palaearctic Region (Bernardi 1973; Richter 1988, 1997; Narchuk 2007) and is characterized by the wing venation: The apical part of the wing occasionally has supernumerary transverse veins, R3 is present, R3+4 and R5 are free, M1 and M2 are free, the diagonal vein reaches the wing margin, and the proboscis is well developed and longer than the head. One of the important tools to separate nemestrinid species is the genitalia, composed of the well-developed hypandrium, partly fused with the gonocoxites with a linguiform apical projection bearing numerous hairs; and the elongate gonocoxal apodemes, which are sinuate and fused medially forming a dorsal bridge (Richter and Ovtshinnikova 1996; Richter 1997).
Nemestrinus is primarily distributed along the arid desert belt of the Palaearctic Region where several species occur in North Africa (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt) and the Middle East (Arabia, Israel, Iran), east to Central Asia, as far as Mongolia and southern Russia, and in addition southern Europe (Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, France, Spain, and Turkey). The genus penetrates south into the Saharan part of the Afrotropical Region, being recorded from Sudan and Ethiopia (Bernardi 1973; Richter 1988, 1997). The type localities of seven species are situated in Egypt: N.abdominalis Olivier, 1811, N.aegyptiacus (Wiedemann, 1828), N.ater (Olivier, 1811), N.fasciatus (Olivier, 1811), N.reticulatus Latreille, 1802, N.ruficornis Macquart, 1840, and N.rufipes (Steyskal and El-Bialy 1967; Bernardi 1973; Richter 1988).
Two catalogues cover the nemestrinid fauna of Egypt: the monograph of Sack (1933) lists ten species and one variety [Nemestrellusabdominalis, N.ater, N.exalbidus (Lichtwardt, 1907), N.fascifrons, N.ruficornis, N.rufipes, Nemestrinusaegyptiacus, Ne.a. var. jullieni, Ne.persicus, Ne.reticulatus, and Rhynchocephalusfasciatus] in three genera (Nemestrellus, Nemestrinus, Rhynchocephalus), while Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967) list eleven species and one variety in the same three genera, adding R.caucasicus to Sack’s monograph. There are also outdated works (e.g., Bequaert 1932, 1938) on the taxonomic status of the genus. Bernardi (1973) reviewed the world genera, and Richter (1988) presented the Palaearctic catalogue of Nemestrinidae; both listed ten species in Egypt, removing the same two species (Nemestrinuscaucasicus and N.persicus) listed by Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967). Bernardi (1973) and Richter (1988) added N.pallipes that was not listed in Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967) as Egyptian species.
There is no modern comprehensive work identifying and cataloguing the Egyptian nemestrinine fauna. The subfamily in Egypt has never been monographed, and the genus is very much in need of a modern revision. This study was undertaken to revise, update, and clarify the taxonomic status of the species of genus Nemestrinus Latreille in the Egyptian fauna.
Materials and methods
Specimens examined in this study are deposited in the following collections:
ASUCEntomology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University
AZUC Faculty of Agriculture, Alfieri, Al Azhar University
CUCEntomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University
ESECEntomological Society of Egypt
MAC Department of Taxonomy, Plant Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture
NHMWNaturhistorisches Museum Wien, Austria
The Museum für Naturkunde, Germany, Berlin (ZMHB) is the depository of type specimens of N.aegyptiacus, N.rufipes, and N.lateralis Wiedemann, 1828 (the latter is a synonym of the second species). We obtained this information by personal communication with Mr. Sven Marotzke and Ms. Elena Grigoryeva.
We could not access the types of other species because some are missing, as in the Egyptian Society of Entomology, wherein type specimens of the species N.jullieni have apparently been destroyed, and it is not known where the other types are. We examined and revised the original descriptions of all Egyptian nemestrinid species.
The Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (USNM) has specimens of Nemestrinidae from Egypt: N.abdominalis, N.aegyptiacus, and N.rufipes that have all been identified by Dr. Torsten Dikow using our key. Redescriptions are based on series of specimens of each of these species and body measurements include genitalia.
Morphological terms follow McAlpine et al. (1981), Richter and Ovtshinnikova (1996), Richter (1997) and Cumming and Wood (2017). Line drawings of body parts were made by using a stereomicroscope at a magnification of 40×. We have access to the photographs by Ms. Elena Grigoryeva, Mr. Sven Marotzke, and Bernhard Schurian of the types that were downloaded at https://doi.org/10.7479/4wgc-dv22.
Taxonomic accountAnimaliaDipteraNemestrinidae694F9D03-4D8D-55D9-9F49-3B9453F61225NemestrinusNemestrinusLatreille, 1802: 437. Type species: Nemestrinusreticulatus Latreille, 1802: 437.RhynchocephalusFischer, 1806: 219–220.AndrenomyiaRondani, 1850: 189.HeminemestrinusBequaert, 1932: 21.SymmictoidesBequaert, 1932: 105.NemestrellusSack, 1933: 7.NemestrinaRondani, 1850: 189, 197: incorrect subsequent spelling of Nemestrinus Latreille, 1802 or subsequent usage of Nemestrina Blanchard, 1845: 468.Remarks.
Currently there are six species the Egyptian fauna (N.aegyptiacus, N.ater, N.exalbidus, N.fasciatus, N. reticulatus, and N.rufipes). The type specimens of N.jullieni deposited in ESEC have been destroyed by dermestid beetles and the types of the species N.aegyptiacus and N.rufipes and the type of latter’s synonym N.lateralis are deposited in ZMHB.
Three species (N.caucasicusN.pallipes, and N.persicus) have been treated as doubtful since there is no evidence of their occurrence in Egypt. This is based on their known distributions as listed in the world catalogue by Bernardi (1973), the Palaearctic catalogue by Richter (1988), and the Systema Dipterorum (Thompson and Pape 2021). Additionally, the type localities of N.caucasicus and N.persicus are in the Caucasus, Iran, and Jaffa (Israel) respectively, not in Egypt.
Key to the Egyptian species of Nemestrinus
1
Wing without supernumerary transverse veins (Fig. 65)
N.fasciatus
–
Wing with supernumerary transverse veins, resulting in reticulate venation (Fig. 8)
2
2
Small cells extending forward posterior to R1 (Fig. 27); frons shiny black with a transverse white band
N.ater
–
Small cells extending forward posterior to R2 (Fig. 18); frons entirely pollinose or with a shiny spot
3
3
Small cells restricted between R2 and hind margin (Fig. 85); abdomen entirely black or grey with transverse black stripes
4
–
Small cells restricted between R2 and M1 or M2 (Figs 46, 90); abdomen orange with a longitudinal black vitta (Figs 57, 101)
Nemestrinusaegyptiacus: Syntype female, without date, Egypt (ZMHB) (pers. comm., Mr. Sven Marotzke). Nemestrinusjullieni: Type W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N, 31°18'42.2"E , 15.iii.1922, Helwan 29°50'37.6"N, 31°19'05.0"E , 20.iii.1925; Lectotype male “W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N 31°18'42.2"E, 23.iii.1922”, Egypt (formerly ESEC, destroyed by dermestid beetles).
Specimens examined.
N.aegyptiacus: Burg El-Arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 25.iii.1927 (1 f#), 25.iii.1934 (1 m#); Helwan 29°50'37.6"N, 31°19'05.0"E, 17.iii.1934 (1 f#), 16.iii.1935 (1 f#); W. dar El Maskhara 29°47'02.9"N, 31°24'59.9"E , 11.iv.1927 (1 f#); W. Garawi 29°47'43.9"N 31°25'54.9"E, 22.iii.1930 (1 f#), 31.iii.1930 (1 m#); W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N, 31°18'42.2"E, 10.iii.1930 (2 m#) (AZUC); Abu Rawash 30°04'30.7"N, 31°11'59.7"E, 7.iii.1955 (9 m#), 8.iii.1955 (3 m# & 1 f#), 13.iii.1955 (4 m# & 3 f#), 17.iii.1955 (5 m# & 4 f#), 20.iii.1955 (2 m# & 5 f#); Giza 30°00'40.0"N, 31°11'31.4"E, 22.iii.1954 (1 m#), 17.v.1955 (1 m#); Helwan 29°50'37.6"N, 31°19'05.0"E, 17.iii.1934 (1 m#), 20.iii.1934 (1 m#), 3.iv.1934 (1 f#); Ogret El-Sheik 29°52'50.1"N, 31°18'27.8"E , 25.ii.1927 (1 m#); W. Garawi 29°47'43.9"N 31°25'54.9"E, 25.iii.1932 (1 f#); W. Rishrash 29°27'51"N, 31°22'2"E, 29.iii.1935 (1 f#); W. Silly Helwan 29°50'37.6"N, 31°19'05.0"E, 19.iii.1926 (1 f#); Ain Mousa 29°52'22.0"N, 32°39'00.7"E , 16.iii.1925 (2 f#) (CUC); Asyut (Lentil) 27°23'00.0"N, 31°44'38.0"E, 3.iii.1965 (2 m# & 6 f#); Ogret El-Sheik 29°52'50.1"N, 31°18'27.8"E, 21.iii.1926 (2 f#); Burg El-arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 25.iii.1927 (1 m#), 9.iii.1928 (1 m#); Kafr Hakim 30°04'39.7"N, 31°06'46.3"E, 24.iii.1924 (1 m#); Gerga (Eg. Lupia) 26°20'23.2"N, 31°53'21.3"E , 2.iv.1965 (2 f#); W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N, 31°18'42.2"E, 21.iii.1922 (1 f#), 22.iii.1927 (1 m#); W. Morrah 22°22'39.1"N, 33°46'00.3"E, 25.iii.1921 (1 m#); W. Silly Helwan 29°50'37.6"N, 31°19'05.0"E, 23.iii.1926 (1 m#), 25.iii.1927 (2 f#) (MAC); Abu Mena 30°50'28"N, 29°39'49"E, 15.iii.1953 (1 m#), 8.iv.1954 (3 m#); Gabal Asfar 30°12'05.7"N 31°21'19.7"E, 9.iii.1951 (1 f#), 19.iii.1951 (1 f#); Kerdasa 30°01'32.1"N, 31°06'27.5"E, 14.iv.1951 (1 f#), 20.iii.1952 (1 f#) (ASUC); (1 m#), without data (NHMW) sent by Dr. Peter Sehnal; Egypt (1 f#), without date, (ZMHB) sent by Mr. Sven Marotzke and Bernhard Schurian; Cairo, Shoubra, 30°4'27.1632"N, 31°14'53.9844"E, 28.iii.1921 (1 m#), specimen number USNMENT01371555 (USNM) (identified by Dr. Torsten Dikow).
Specimens previously identified as N.julieni: Abu Rawash 30°04'30.7"N, 31°11'59.7"E, 7.iii.1955 (1 m#), 8.iii.1955 (1 m#), 13.iii.1955(1 m#); Burg El-Arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 25.iii.1934 (4 m# & 4 f#); W. Garawi 29°47'43.9"N, 31°25'54.9"E, 25.iii.1932 (2 f#), 21.iii.1930 (1 f#); W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N, 31°18'42.2"E, 28.ii.1927 (1 m#); W. Um Elek 29°52'59.9"N, 31°31'00.1"E, 21.iii.1924 (1 f#) (CUC); Ain Mousa 29°52'22.0"N, 32°39'00.7"E , 16.iii.1925 (2 f#); Asyut (Lentil) 27°23'00.0"N, 31°44'38.0"E, 3.iii.1965 (1 m# & 2 f#); Burg El-Arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 14.iv.1920 (1 m#), 16.ii.1922 (1 f#),12.iv.1923 (1 f#),11.iv.1925 (1 m#), 18.iv.1925 (1 f#); Kafr Hakim 30°04'39.7"N, 31°06'46.3"E, 20.iv.1925 (1 f#); W. Garawi 29°47'43.9"N, 31°25'54.9"E, 14.iv.1928 (1 f#); W. Morrah 22°22'39.1"N, 33°46'00.3"E, 25.iii.1927 (1 f#), W. Silly Helwan 29°50'37.6"N, 31°19'05.0"E, 19.iii.1926 (2 f#), 22.iii.1926 (1 f#), W. Um Elek 29°52'59.9’’ N, 31°31'00.1"E, 21.iii.1924 (1 f#) (MAC); Kosseir 26°06'26.2"N, 34°16'38.8"E, 24.ii.1965 (1 m#); W. Digla 29°59'00.1"N, 31°19'41.2"E, 5.iv.1952 (1 f#), 13.iii.1955 (1 m#); W. Natroun 30°25'58.2"N, 30°14'39.2"E, 13.iii.1955 (3 f# & 1 m#), (2 m# & 1 f#), without data (ASUC).
Diagnosis.
Frons and face entirely yellow or grayish pollinosity; thorax completely shiny black with yellowish hairs; wing with many small cells restricted between R2 and hind margin; abdomen entirely black with short erect hairs. Male genitalia with only outer gonocoxal process; gonocoxal apodemes long, narrow, sinuate, fused medially and forming a narrow dorsal bridge; gonostyli wider than gonocoxal processes, ventrally with a cleft and small projection. Aedeagal complex with tapered aedeagus and lateral parameres, which are usually separated apically, fused with basal part of the aedeagus; parameral apodeme rather long; ejaculatory apodeme long and broad.
Redescription.
Length: male body 14–17 mm, wing 13.5–15 mm. Female body 14–20 mm, wing 13.5–16.5 mm. Head wider than thorax; frons with yellow or grayish yellow pollinosity, with rather long hairs, at antennal elevation frons wide but narrowing toward vertex; face relatively shorter than high, with dull pollinosity, its hairs similar to those of the frons (Figs 4–6, 14–16); antenna entirely blackish brown to black, scape and pedicel with long hairs (Figs 7, 17). Thorax shiny black; mesonotum with dense pale yellow hairs but rather long; pleurae with tuft-like hairs. Leg hairy, yellowish brown with black femora. Wing smoky brown, except apex and posterapical margin clear and transparent (Figs 8, 18). The differences in cell number and structure on the wing is continuous variation and inconsistently different between males and females. Abdomen entirely shiny black, covered with yellowish pubescence except the venter is blackish, which is rather short and erect, excluding dorsal side of two basal segments and on lateral margins of second segment where it is much longer and tufted, also on hind margin of each segment appear as narrow light bands (Figs 9, 19). Male genitalia with only outer gonocoxal process; gonocoxal apodemes long, narrow, sinuate, fused medially, and forming a narrow dorsal bridge; gonostyli wider than gonocoxal processes, ventrally with a cleft and small projection (Figs 10, 11). Aedeagal complex with tapered aedeagus and lateral parameres, which are usually separated apically, fused with basal part of aedeagus; parameral apodeme rather long; ejaculatory apodeme long and broad (Figs 12, 13). Female genitalia with subgenital plate rectangular with two hairy lobes (Fig. 20); genital furca free, narrow, with broadened ends of posterior projections, bent medially; median aperture of genital furca nearly triangular (Fig. 21); uterus rounded, with two narrow and rather long spermathecae (Fig. 22).
After examining the female type specimen of Nemestrinusaegyptiacus (Fig. 1) and comparing it with a large series of specimens identified as Nemestrinusjullieni Efflatoun (some specimens were by seen by him but it is not clear who determined the identification), we confirm this identification, and it is clear that both are the same species. Hence, N.julieni is placed as a synonym instead of a subspecies based on examination of the series of specimens and dissections of genitalia of both N.aegyptiacus and N.julieni and the female type specimen of N.aegyptiacus, and comparisons with the genitalia figures of Bernardi’s (1973: figs 54–56) N.aegyptiacus.
Specimens previously identified as N.abdominalis: Egypt (1 f#), without date, specimen number USNMENT01371553 (USNM) (previously identified by W. Wirth as N.abdominalis but as N.ater by Dr. Torsten Dikow using our key).
Diagnosis.
Frons shiny black with a transverse white band; wing with small cells extending forward from R1 to hind margin; abdomen orange with longitudinal black vitta in male but entirely black in female.
Redescription.
Length: male body 10–16 mm, wing 9–15 mm. Female body 14–21 mm, wing 10–13 mm. Male: Frons shiny black with transverse white band; face rather short, snout-like, sides with grayish yellow pollinosity (Figs 23–25). Antenna blackish and pollinose (Fig. 26).
Thorax black or blackish brown, with blackish to yellowish brown hairs, pleurae with long and dense black hairs; leg blackish or dark yellow; claws well developed; pulvilli almost rudimentary. Wing blackish brown, but apex and postero-apical margin pale brown; wing with many small cells extend forward from R1 to hind margin (Fig. 27). Abdomen short, wide, reddish to orange with longitudinal black strip that is narrow posteriorly and sometimes absent at apex (Fig. 28). Male genitalia with gonocoxite having two processes, inner process short and slender, whereas the outer process is longer, thicker and subapically curved; gonostyli longer than the inner gonocoxal processes but shorter than the outer one, with subapical cleft and small projection (Figs 29, 30); aedeagus free, narrow distally and fused proximally with parameres; parameres slightly sinuate; parameral apodeme a long, while aedeagal tine is short; ejaculatory apodeme slender and narrow (Figs 31, 32). Female. Similar as male (Figs 33–37), except: eyes widely separated more than in male. Abdomen entirely black or at least with reddish black lateral margins (Fig. 38). Head in male slightly wider than thorax but in female narrower than thorax. Female genitalia with quadrate subgenital plate, bilobed distally (Fig. 39); genital furca with furcated arms and serrated laterally (Fig. 40); uterus small, with terminal accessory process; spermathecal ducts narrow and long with oval medium spermathecae (Fig. 41).
Nemestrinusabdominalis and N.fascifrons are newly synonymized with N.ater. The earlier works of Lichtwardt (1909, 1919), Villeneuve (1912), and Bequaert (1938) suggested that N.ater, N.abdominalis, and N.fascifrons were closely related to each other based on Egyptian, Tunisian, and Palestinian material. We observed that N.ater has sexually dimorphic abdominal color. We also discovered that all the specimens previously identified by Efflatoun as N.fascifrons are males and we confirm these identifications. We also confirm that all the specimens that were previously identified by the same author as N.ater are females and confirmed by us as N.fascifrons. The two “species” of Efflatoun were captured from approximately the same locality and time of year by the same collector, i.e., “Efflatoun collected males at W. Garawi on 22.iii.1930 and 31.iii.1930 and females at W. Garawi on 22.iii.1930 and 31.iii.1930”; both are deposited in the Cairo University collection. We observed the sexual dimorphism and regard them as representing the same species.
AnimaliaDipteraNemestrinidaeF362BA44-4E63-54EF-BC33-3B743528D59DNemestrinusexalbidus(Lichtwardt, 1907)Figures 42–51, 52–60NemestrinaexalbidusLichtwardt, 1907: 441. Type locality: Israel (Jerusalem).Specimens examined.
W. Dar El-Maskhara 29°47'02.9"N, 31°24'59.9"E, 12.iv.1930 (1 f#); W. Hodein South Eastern Desert 23°5'14’"N, 35°19'45"E, 17.iii.1928 (1 m#); W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N, 31°18'42.2"E, 12.iv.1921 (1 f#), 24.iii.1930 (1 m#); W. Zohleiga 26°07'59.9"N, 33°45'00.0"E, 27.iii.1925 (1 f#) (AZUC); Abu Rowash 30°04'30.7"N, 31°11'59.7"E, 16.iii.1927 (1 f#); Ogret El-Sheikh 29°52'50.1"N, 31°18'27.8"E, 31.iii.1926 (1 f#); W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N, 31°18'42.2"E, 24.iii.1930 (1 m#); W. Rishrash 29°27'51"N, 31°22'2"E, 29.iii.1935 (7 m# & 4 f#) (CUC); Ogret El-Sheikh 29°52'50.1"N, 31°18'27.8"E, 14.iii.1927 (1 m#); W. Hoff 29°53'02.6"N, 31°18'42.2"E, 30.iii.1928 (1 m#); W. Zohleiga 26°07'59.9"N, 33°45'00.0"E, 25,29.iii.1925 (1 f#) (MAC); Etaka 29°26'19.1"N, 32°28'07.2"E , 22.ii.1951(1 f#), 26.iii.1951 (1 m#); Kerdasa 30°01'32.1"N, 31°06'27.5"E, 14.iv.1951 (3 f#); Mansouriah 29°58'05.3"N, 31°08'51.9"E, 25.iv.1957 (1 m#); W. Kaber 23°26'29"N, 25°50'23"E, 1.iv.1994 (1 f#) (ASUC).
Diagnosis.
Frons covered with dense gray pollinosity except shiny black oval callus below ocellar triangle; wing hyaline, except slightly brownish along anterior margin, with a few small cells extending forward from R2+3 to M1 or M2. Abdomen orange or reddish with longitudinal median black vitta.
Redescription.
Length: male body 14–17 mm, wing 12.5–14.5 mm. Female body 18 mm, wing 15.5 mm. Head shiny black with white hairs; frons covered with dense gray pollinosity except shiny black oval callus below ocellar triangle; face rather conical (Figs 42–44, 52–54). Thorax shiny black with dense whitish hairs laterally and a few dorsally. Leg orange, but femora black. Wing hyaline, except pale brownish anterior margin, with just a few small cells extending forward from R2+3 to M1 or M2 (Figs 46, 56). The differences in cell number and structure on the wing is continuous variation and inconsistently different between males and females. Abdomen orange or reddish with longitudinal black median vitta; base of abdomen covered with dense, short, yellowish gray hairs, lateral margins of subsequent segments with dense white hairs; venter of abdomen entirely orange (Figs 47, 57). Gonocoxite with only inner gonocoxal process, tapered apically (Figs 48, 49); distiphallus narrow; parameral apodeme rather short, aedeagal tine narrow and curved, forming semicircle, pointed distally; ejaculatory apodeme distally broader (Figs 50, 51). Female differentiated from male by the eyes that are more dichoptic. Female genitalia with rectangular subgenital plate, excavated proximally to approx. 1/2 length of plate (Fig. 58); genital furca with small genital aperture, between projections with broad ends, and curved posteromedially with small curve on upper and lower margins (Fig. 59); uterus large and flatted, spermathecae long (Fig. 60).
Egypt, Iran, and Israel (Sack 1933; Bernardi 1973; Richter 1988).
AnimaliaDipteraNemestrinidae2EA43BCE-8DBE-5567-91C8-B55725DED1DENemestrinusfasciatus(Olivier, 1811)Figures 61–70, 71–79NemestrinafasciataOlivier, 1811: 171–172. Type locality: Egypt.Specimens examined.
Burg El-Arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 6.v.1926 (1 m#); Burg El-Arab, 2.v.1921 (10 m#) (AZUC); Burg El-Arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 5.v.1926 (1 f#) (CUC); Burg El-Arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 10.v.1927 (1 m#), 19.iv.1928 (6 m# & 6 f#); King Mariut 30°57'27.2"N, 29°38'51.0"E 14.iv.1915 (1 m#), 23.v.1925 (1 m#); Burg El-Arab 30°54'12.7"N, 29°33'13.7"E, 2.v.1924 (1 f#) (MAC); Max 31°09'50.5"N, 29°51'47.7"E, 21.iv.1952 (1 f#) (ASUC).
Diagnosis.
Frons and face with dense whitish hairs and pollinose; inner ends of transverse suture with two white spots; wing hyaline with brownish base, veins yellowish, without additional small cells; abdomen black with transverse white bands, slightly curved medially; gonocoxite with inner and outer processes, the inner tapered apically, outer slightly curved subapically; gonostyli broader than gonocoxal processes with broad subapical projection; aedeagal complex narrow, aedeagus slightly broader distally.
Redescription.
Length: male body 13–16.5 mm, wing 1–12 mm. Female) body 12–19.5 mm, wing 1–13 mm.
Head triangular in profile, ventrally with dense, short, whitish hairs; frons and face with dense whitish hairs and pollinosity (Figs 61–63, 71–73); antenna distinctly jointed, stylus is brown (Figs 64, 74). Thorax slightly shiny black; inner parts of transverse suture with two white spots; scutellum and mesonotum with grayish yellow hairs; pleurae with long white hairs. Leg with blackish femora covered with whitish hairs; tibiae and tarsi brown with brownish red hairs; pulvilli orange, nearly as long as claws. Wing hyaline with brownish infuscate base; veins yellowish, without additional small cells (Figs 65, 75). Abdomen black with transverse white bands, whi slightly curved medially; basal segments with long yellowish hairs but subsequent segments with white hairs; venter of abdomen with dense white hairs that fold on the lateral margins (Figs 66, 76). Gonocoxite with inner and outer processes, inner tapered apically, outer slightly curved subapically; gonostyli broader than gonocoxal processes with broad projection subapically (Figs 67, 68); aedeagal complex narrow, aedeagus slightly broader apically (Figs 69, 70).
Female of Nemestrinusfasiciatus, head, frontal (71), head, dorsal (72), head, lateral (73), antenna (74), wing (75), and abdomen (76). 77–79 female genitalia: subgenital plate (77), genital furca (78), and spermathecae (79). Abbreviations: ma. median aperture, pl. posterolateral projection, sp. spermatheca, spd. spermathecal duct, ut. uterus.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/611024
Female: eyes separated in both sexes but considerably broader than in male at vertex; genitalia with sub-rectangular subgenital plate (Fig. 77); genital furca narrower anteriorly with four incurved posterolateral projections (Fig. 78); uterus with terminal accessory process; spermathecae rather long (Fig. 79).
AnimaliaDipteraNemestrinidae12D5534B-BDDB-5096-ABBF-E58113D7A687NemestrinusreticulatusLatreille, 1802Figures 80–85NemestrinusreticulatusLatreille, 1802: 437. Type locality: not given but according to Latreille (1809: 307), it is Egypt and Syria.RhynchocephaluslatreilleiFischer, 1812: 195.NemestrinacinctusMacquart, 1840: 16.NemestrinakindermanniBischof, 1905: 172.Diagnosis.
Frons with shiny yellow or black spot below ocelli; mesonotum with two gray spots at inner ends of the transverse suture, between them there is a thin longitudinal stripe; wing hyaline in posterior 1/2 and apex but brownish on anterior 1/2 and slightly infuscate at base; wing with small cells that extend forward from R2 to hind margin; abdomen gray, matte, with incomplete transverse black stripes; tergite II bears shiny black spots divided in the middle by a transverse longitudinal gray strip; black spots on tergites III–V more or less fused into bands with an emargination along the posterior margin; on tergite III, gray emargination varies from very deep to nearly absent; abdominal venter with dense gray pollinosity, the second sternite with central black spot.
Description.
Length: body 14–15 mm. Head black with dense gray pollinosity and whitish hairs; frons with shiny yellow or black spot below ocelli, in male frons at vertex nearly as wide as eye width (Figs 80, 83), while in female nearly twice as eye width (Fig. 81); antenna with orange scape and pedicel, first flagellomere brown to blackish brown with some gray pollinosity (Fig. 82), basal two segments of stylus subequal in length and segment III 2/3 × longitudinal eye diameter; palpi yellow or brown with black apices. Thorax pale black with yellowish white or grayish white hairs, but longer and denser on scutellum and pleurae; mesonotum with two gray spots at inner ends of transverse suture and between them is a thin longitudinal stripe. Leg rusty red; in females, only hind tarsi blackish or hind leg entirely blackish; in males, all femora black; hind tibiae and tarsi blackish. Wing hyaline over posterior 1/2 and at apex, but somewhat brown over anterior 1/2 and slightly infuscate at base; wing with small cells that extend forward from R2 to hind margin (Fig. 85). Abdomen gray, matte, with incomplete transverse black stripes; tergite II with shiny black spots divided in the middle by a transverse longitudinal gray strip; black spots on tergites III–V are more or less fused into bands with an emargination along the posterior margin; on tergite III, gray emargination varies from very deep to nearly absent; abdominal venter with dense gray pollinosity, sternite II with black central spot (Fig. 84).
Armenia, Egypt, Greece, Russia (Caucasus), Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Turkey (Sack 1933; Bernardi 1973).
Remarks.
This species is not represented in Egyptian collections nor in the field. We include the species here and in the key below as it has been recorded from Egypt (Sack 1933 & Bernardi 1973 & Richter 1988); future research might reveal its presence in this part of Africa.
Nemestrinusrufipes: Type male, “Aegypten”, Egypt (ZMHB) (pers. comm. Mr. Sven Marotzke). Nemestrinalateralis: Type female, “Aegypten”, Egypt (ZMHB) (pers. comm. Mr. Sven Marotzke).
Frons covered with dense orange yellow pollinosity except with shiny blackish brown transverse oval callus below dark orange ocellar triangle; wing with yellowish brown band in the middle, but clear in apical part and along posterior margin; wing with small cells extending forward from R2 to M1 or M2. Abdomen orange to reddish orange with longitudinal black median vitta; first tergite entirely black, tergite II on anterior margin with transverse white band. Gonocoxite with inner process slightly tapered; gonostyli longer than gonocoxal process, curved subapically with small projection; aedeagus fused proximally with parameres and separated distally, parameres and aedeagus with small indentations distally in lateral view.
Redescription.
Length: male body13.5–18.5 mm, wing 11.5–16 mm. Female body 14–21 mm, wing 12–17.5 mm. Head short, wider than thorax; frons covered with dense orange-yellow pollinosity except with shiny blackish brown transverse oval callus (Figs 86–88, 96–98); face shiny brownish orange with short yellow hairs; antenna orange (Figs 89, 99); proboscis black, as long as thorax, upper surface of base with short yellow hairs; palpi orange. Thorax shiny black with yellow hairs, longer and denser on the sides and in front; mesonotum with indistinct spots at inner ends of transverse suture. Leg orange, coxae and base of femora somewhat brown, pulvilli light yellow and nearly 1/2 length of claw. Wing with yellowish brown band in the middle, but clear apically and along posterior margin; wing with small cells extending forward from R2 to M1 or M2 (Figs 90, 100). Halter brown with light yellow pedicel. Abdomen orange to reddish orange with longitudinal black median vitta; tergite I entirely black, tergite II with transverse white band; abdomen with short and golden yellow hairs but longer laterally; abdominal venter orange and with black lateral margins (Figs 91, 101). Gonocoxite with inner process slightly tapered; gonostyli longer than gonocoxal process, curved subapically with small projection (Fig. 93); aedeagus fused proximally with parameres and separated distally, parameres and aedeagus with small indentations distally in lateral view (Figs 94, 95). Female genitalia: rectangular subgenital plate with large curve (Fig. 102); genital furca with large aperture surrounded by narrow and slightly curved posterolaterally projections (Fig. 103); uterus with small terminal accessory; spermathecae nearly as long as the uterus (Fig. 104).
Algeria, Egypt, and Syria (Sack 1933; Bernardi 1973; Richter 1988).
Remarks.
Bernardi (1973) and Richter (1988) considered N.rufipes and N.ruficornis to be valid species but, in contrast, Lichtwardt (1909) and Bequaert (1938) synonymized the two. We agree with this decision based on a comparison of the original description of N.ruficornis (no material was examined) with the male type specimen of N.rufipes (Fig. 2) and the female type specimen of N.lateralis (Fig. 3), both in ZMHB, in addition to both sexes of many old Egyptian specimens of N.rufipes. Thus, we confirm that N.rufipes and N.ruficornis are conspecific and the first is the valid name, and Nemestrinusruficornis is here synonymized with N.rufipes.
List of doubtful species.
In the present study, three species are treated as doubtful and are excluded from the list of Egyptian Nemestrinidae: Nemestrinuscaucasicus, Nemestrinuspallipes, and Nemestrinuspersicus.
Discussion
As a result of this revision, we can confirm six species of Nemestrinus present in Egypt. This is lower than the 12 taxa (eleven species and one subspecies) listed by Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967) but three species are treated as doubtfully occurring including N.pallipes added by Bernardi (1973) and Richter (1988) as Egyptian species and three species that are newly synonymized (N.abdominalis, N.fascifrons, and N.ruficornis). Furthermore, N.jullieni, a subspecies designated by Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967), is confirmed as a synonym of N.aegyptiacus.
The first species (N.caucasicus) does not occur in Egypt according to Sack (1933), Bequaert (1938), Bernardi (1973), Richter (1988), Narchuk (2007), or Kocak and Kemal (2013), whereas Paramonov (1951) reported it from North Africa but without examining any Egyptian material. It is also listed by Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967) citing the literature but not represented in the Egyptian reference collections.
The second species (N.pallipes) is not represented in Egyptian collections. This species was previously considered to be an Egyptian species based on an erroneous interpretation of its type locality (Java) by Bequaert (1932), Bernardi (1973), and Richter (1988), for reasons unknown. The type locality was given by Olivier (1811) in his original description as Java, while describing seven new species from Egypt, although two of them were from Arabia and around the Caspian Sea. Olivier (1811) based his paper on material collected from different areas in the Middle East and his “Java” evidently refers to a place near Tel-Aviv in Israel currently known as Jaffa, not an Egyptian locality. We communicated with managers in Tel Aviv museum (Steinhardt museum), Diptera collection (Dr. Elizabeth Morguilis and Dr. Ariel-Leib Frieman), who checked the nemestrinid group and they do not have any specimens of this species in their collections. This species is also not mentioned in the list of Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967). Although it is believed that this species does not occur in Egypt, it may yet be found and recorded from the country.
The third species (N.persicus) is reported in Sack (1933) and Paramonov (1945) as an Egyptian species, but without any listing of Egyptian material. It is also mentioned as an Egyptian species by Steyskal and El-Bialy (1967) but is not represented in Egyptian reference collections; however, Bequaert (1932), Bernardi (1973), and Richter (1988) excluded it as an Egyptian species. The type locality in the original description was given as Iran by Lichtwardt (1909) and, consequently, this species is excluded from the Egyptian fauna.
Nemestrinusreticulatus is stated here as not having any specimens in Egyptian collections and is not excluded from the Egyptian fauna in our study because we trust the descriptions of Latreille (1809) who originally reported the species in Egypt. Our drawings of this species are reproduced from Bequaert (1938), Sack (1933), and Seguy (1926).
As we observed on the maps there are similarities in the distributions of N.aegyptiacus and N.rufipes, which are longitudinally scattered from Lower to Upper Egypt and the western and eastern deserts, while N.faciatus is concentrated only in some localities on the coastal strip in Alexandria. Nemestrinusexalbidus is dispersed around the lower Egyptian delta and a few localities in the western and eastern deserts. Nemestrinusater has a crosswise distribution in the northern area of Egypt including Sinai, and the lower and upper Nile valley (see Map 1), and one record in the eastern desert, in addition to one locality near Libya.
The species of Nemestrinus are concentrated in the semiarid areas around the Nile delta, especially around Lower Egypt and in some arid areas in western, eastern, and the Egyptian Sinai deserts. The wider geographical distribution of Nemestrinus in the adjacent countries includes North Africa (Algeria, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia) which all have a large percentage of the arid deserts that these nemestrinid species prefer. And at nearly the same latitude are Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Syria which also have arid areas (deserts) and may support species.
We found based that the seasonal imago flight activity of all Nemestrinus species in Egypt is in the spring season (March, April, and May) and only the species N.ater and N.exalbidus may also be activate in February.
Acknowledgements
We extend our sincere thanks to Dr. Neveen S. Gadallah, Dr. Magdy Shaban, and Dr. Yusuf Edmardash, the curators of the Cairo University Collection (CUC), Entomology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University. Deepest appreciation is also offered to Dr. Stefan Ober, Red Sea Environmental Centre (RSEC), and we also thank Dr. Bradley J. Sinclair, Canadian National Collection of Insects and Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Plant Laboratory – Entomology, for kindly providing some valuable literature. Deepest thanks to Dr. Peter Sehnal, Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Austria, for providing pictures of N.aegyptiacus specimen. Also deepest appreciation to Ms. Elena Grigoryeva, Mr. Sven Marotzke, and Bernhard Schurian, museum für Naturkunde, Germany, Berlin, who kindly provided pictures of the types (Nemestrinusaegyptiacus and N.rufipes and its synonym type N.lateralis) in different positions. Special thanks to Dr. Torsten Dikow, Smithsonian NMNH (USNM) research entomologist for Diptera, for identifying some Egyptian nemestrinid species existing in USNM. Many thanks to Dr. Elizabeth Morgulis, Dr. Netta Dorchin, and Dr. Ariel-Leib Frieman for checking the nemestrinid specimens in Tel Aviv museum (Steinhardt museum). Also, we are grateful to Dr. Adrian Pont (Oxford University Museum of Natural History, UK), who checked the English and made some corrections to this manuscript.
ReferencesBequaertJ (1932) The Nemestrinidae (Diptera) in the V.v. Röder collection.100: 13–33.BequaertJ (1938) Sur quelques Nemestrinides palaearctiques, particulièrement d l’Iran.78: 292–310.BernardiN (1973) The genera of the Family Nemestrinidae (Diptera: Brachycera).24(4): 211–318. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v24i4p211-318BigotJ (1888) Imprimerie nationale, Paris, 11 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.53767BischofJ (1905) Neuropteren und Dipteren. In: PentherAZederbauerE (Eds) Ergebnisse einer naturwissenschaftlichen Reise zum Erdschias-Dagh (Kleinasien).20: 170–179.BlanchardCE (1845) Histoire des insectes, traitant de leurs moeurs et leurs métamorphoses en général et comprenant une nouvelle classification fondée sur leurs rapports naturels. Coléoptères, orthoptères, thysanoptères, névroptères, lépidoptères, hémiptères, aphaniptères, strepsiptères, diptères, anoplures et thysanures 2: e20. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.35820EfflatounHC (1925) A new species of Nemestrina (Dipt. Nemestrinidae) from Egypt.8: 357–360.ElHawagryMGilbertF (2014) Zoogeographical affinities and faunal relationships of bee flies (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in Egypt.60(1): 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.2014.892339CummingJMWoodDM (2017) Manual of Afrotropical Diptera.1: 89–133.FischerG (1806) Observation d’un nouveau genre d’une nouvelle famille de diptères du Caucase.1: 217–227.FischerG (1812) Observation d’un nouveau genre de diptéres. Lue a la séance du 17 janvier 1806, avec des additions de l’année 1811.1(2): 184–198.KoçakAÖKemalM (2013) Priamus Supplement, Ankara, 411 pp.LatreillePA (1802) Histoire naturelle, genérale et particulière, des crustacés et des insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite à l’histoire naturelle générale et particulière, composée par Leclerc de Buffon, et rédigée par C.S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs sociétés savantes. Tome Troisième. F. Dufart, Paris, 467. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.15764LatreillePA (1809) Koenig, Parisiis and Argentorati [= Paris & Strasbourg], 399 pp.LichtwardtB (1907) Uber die Dipteren-Gattung Nemestrina Latr.7: 433–451.LichtwardtB (1909) Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Nemestriniden.1: 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.48019090117LichtwardtB (1919) Die Nemestriniden des Ungarischen National Museums in Budapest.17: 24–27.MacquartJ (1840) Mémoires de la Société royale des sciences, de l’agriculture et des arts de Lille, Paris, 135 pp.TeskeyHJ (1981) Nemestrinidae. In: McAlpineJFPetersonBVShewellGETeskeyHJVockerothJRWoodDM (Eds) Manual of Nearctic Diptera., 585–588.NarchukEP (2007) Nemestrinid flies (Diptera, Nemestrinidae) in the Fauna of Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.87(8): 1076–1085. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873807080143OlivierGA (1811) Insectes [i. e., Arthropoda), Pt.5].8: 170–172.PapaveroNBernardiN (2009) Manual of Neotropical Diptera, Nemestrinidae. In: Depto.8: 1–11.ParamonovSJ (1945) Bestimmungstabelle der Palaearktischen Nemestrinus-Arten (Nemestrinidae: Diptera). Revista Española de Entomología 21(3/4): 279–295.ParamonovSJ (1951) Bestimmungstabelle der palaearktischen Arten der Gattung Rhynchocephalus (Nemestrinidae: Diptera).146(5–6): 18–127.PapeTBlagoderovBMostovskiBM (2011) Order Diptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: ZhangZ-Q (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness.3148: 223–237. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3148.1.42RichterVA (1988) Family Nemestrinidae. In: SoósÁ. & Papp, L. (eds.5: 171–181.RichterVA (1997) Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 2. Family Nemestrinidae. In: Science Herald, Budapest, 459–468.RichterVAOvtshinnikovaOG (1996) On the structure of male and female genitalia in Palaearctic nemestrinids (Diptera, Nemestrinidae).7(4): 241–249.RondaniC (1850) Osservazioni sopra alquante specie di esapodi ditteri del Museo Torinese.2(3): 165–197.SackP (1933) Die Fliegen der palaearktischen Region, Nemestrinidae. In: LindnerE (Ed.) Stuttgart., 1–42.SteyskalGCEl-BialyS (1967) A list of Egyptian Diptera with a bibliography and key to families. Ministry of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 3: e37.ThompsonFCPapeT (2021) Systema Dipterorum. http://www.diptera.org/ [accessed August 2021]VilleneuveJ (1912) Notes synonymiques.31: 1–97.WiedemannCRW (1828) Schulz, Hamm, 608 pp.