Corresponding author: Ricardo Luría-Manzano (
Academic editor: Anthony Herrel
The Selva Zoque region is characterized by a great variety of ecosystems for which there is little information about reptile species diversity and their conservation status. This study is the first assessment of the species richness, composition, and conservation status of reptiles of this region. Additionally, this information is compared with that of seven other tropical regions in northern Mesoamerica. In total, 141 native reptile species belonging to 81 genera and 29 families are recorded for the Selva Zoque region. Sixty species (42% of the total) recorded in Selva Zoque are in high-risk categories according to the Mexican Ministry of the Environment, the highest number for the Mexican regions of Mesoamerica. According to the IUCN, six species are in high-risk categories, seven species are in Data Deficient, and 23 (16%) have not been evaluated yet. According to the Environmental Vulnerability Scores approach, 28 species (20%) are in the high vulnerability category. The Selva Zoque species composition is most similar to Los Tuxtlas and Lacandona regions, and most dissimilar to Sian Ka´an Biosphere Reserve. The reptilian fauna of Selva Zoque has a distinctive composition, with the highest number (11 species) of endemic reptiles in the northern Mesoamerican, and species from two biogeographic provinces: the Gulf of Mexico and the Mexican Pacific Coast. These results indicate that the Selva Zoque is the most diverse region in native reptile species in northern Mesoamerica, highlighting it as extremely important for the conservation of the reptile fauna at local (southern Mexico) and regional levels (northern Mesoamerica).
Aguilar-López JL, Luría-Manzano R, Pineda E, Canseco-Márquez L (2021) Selva Zoque, Mexico: an important Mesoamerican tropical region for reptile species diversity and conservation. ZooKeys 1054: 127–153.
The 25 biodiversity hotspots identified by
One such region is the Selva Zoque, composed by the Uxpanapa-Chimalapas zone (UC) and El Ocote Biosphere Reserve, is located on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in the states of Veracruz, Oaxaca, and Chiapas in southern Mexico. The Selva Zoque region is the second largest extension of well-conserved tropical forest in northern Mesoamerica, is a Pleistocene refuge with high number of endemic species (
Worldwide, habitat modification represents the most common threat to terrestrial reptile species, with one in five species included in high-risk categories of extinction (Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered) by the IUCN. A further one in five species is listed in the Data Deficient category, and four of ten have not been evaluated according to the criteria of the Red List (
Based on a comprehensive review of databases, scientific literature, and fieldwork, we provide the first assessment of species richness, species composition and distribution, and conservation status of the reptile fauna inhabiting the Selva Zoque region. Additionally, we compared this information with other tropical regions on the northern end of Mesoamerica.
The Selva Zoque region is located in southern Mexico east of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (Fig.
Location of the Selva Zoque region. The yellow line denotes our study area limits, the thin black line indicates state boundaries, and black circles denote localities in which reptiles have been recorded.
We consulted two databases between January 2017 and May 2021: the National Information System on Biodiversity (
We cross-checked records obtained from the three sources of information to avoid duplication, since the databases consulted might have records of the same specimens. Only records with precise geographic coordinates or detailed information about the collection and observation site were included, and from these records we compiled a general database.
To compare the data we compiled for the Selva Zoque region with the data from seven other tropical regions, we obtained information about reptile species richness and species composition from: 1) Los Tuxtlas in Veracruz (
To identify the spatial distribution of reptile records in the study region, we projected all geo-referenced records onto our study area polygon using ArcGIS software, version 10.0 (
We compared reptilian faunal composition between regions using Jaccard’s similarity index (
where
A total of 141 native reptile species belonging to 81 genera and 29 families has been recorded at the Selva Zoque region. These comprise 62 species of lizards, 70 snakes, seven turtles, and two crocodilians (Appendix
Reptiles have been recorded mostly on the periphery of the study region, notably on western, southern and eastern end portions. In the northwest, northeast, and west, reptile collections are located below 1000 m a.s.l., while in the southeast, most of collections are between 1000 and 2000 m a.s.l. The central portion of Chimalapas, the mountainous zone known as Espinazo del Diablo in Uxpanapa and a zone between El Ocote Biosphere Reserve and UC zones corresponding to the northwest extreme of Cintalapa in Chiapas, remain with no collection of reptiles (Fig.
Of the reptile species recorded in the Selva Zoque region, 60 species (42%) are in high-risk categories according to SEMARNAT: 39 species in the Subject to Special Protection category (
With 141 native species recorded, the Selva Zoque region harbors the highest reptile species richness among the tropical regions considered in this study, surpassing Los Tuxtlas (113 species). The Mayan Forest ranks third (107 species), followed by La Lacandona (89 species), La Sepultura (79 species), Calakmul (73 species), Sian Ka´an (63 species), and finally Las Choapas (56 species; Table
Taxonomic composition of native reptile species recorded in the Selva Zoque region and seven other regions in northern Mesoamerica. Non-native species are not included in the taxonomic composition data.
Tropical region | Orders | Families | Genera | Lizards | Snakes | Turtles | Crocodilians | Native species | Non-native species |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selva Zoque | 3 | 29 | 81 | 62 | 70 | 7 | 2 | 141 | 3 |
Los Tuxtlas | 3 | 29 | 75 | 35 | 63 | 14 | 1 | 113 | 4 |
Mayan Forest | 3 | 26 | 70 | 35 | 61 | 9 | 2 | 107 | 1 |
Lacandona | 3 | 25 | 64 | 28 | 52 | 7 | 2 | 89 | 1 |
La Sepultura | 2 | 25 | 59 | 29 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 79 | 2 |
Calakmul | 3 | 21 | 51 | 24 | 39 | 9 | 1 | 73 | 3 |
Sian Ka´an | 3 | 23 | 51 | 25 | 26 | 10 | 2 | 63 | 2 |
Las Choapas | 3 | 20 | 41 | 20 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 56 | 2 |
The dendrogram indicates that La Sepultura has the most dissimilar species composition of the nine regions (Fig.
Similarity in reptile species composition for eight tropical areas in northern Mesoamerica.
The Selva Zoque and Los Tuxtlas regions have the highest number of endemic species to the regions, with eleven each, followed by La Sepultura (three species) and Mayan Forest with one endemic species while the rest of regions do not have endemic species (Appendix
Number of reptile species in high extinction-risk categories according to
Our results show that the Selva Zoque region harbors the greatest reptile species richness in northern Mesoamerica, with a distinctive species composition and several species inhabit exclusively on Selva Zoque region. Furthermore, one in every two reptile species that inhabit in Selva Zoque is threatened, is highly vulnerable or there is not sufficient information to know its extinction risk level. All this underscore the importance of the Selva Zoque region for reptile conservation in Mexico and Mesoamerica. This region also offers opportunities to study unexplored well-preserved tropical forest areas, as well as species for which little is known about their biology, ecology, and conservation status.
The Selva Zoque region is more diverse in native reptile species than even Los Tuxtlas, which has 28 fewer native species (
That said, the inventory of reptile species in the Selva Zoque region is far from complete, particularly in UC zones. In the last three years alone, three new species have been described (
The high species richness in the Selva Zoque region may be the result of a series of factors. One is the notably complex orography with lowland zones, both on the Gulf of Mexico and on the Pacific versant, and also a series of mountain ranges of intermediate elevation–the Sierra Atravesada, the Espinazo del Diablo, the Sierra Tres Picos, and Cerro La Colmena (
Although the Selva Zoque did not result clustered with any of the regions in the similarity analysis, Los Tuxtlas and Lacandona Biosphere Reserves are the most similar tropical regions to the Selva Zoque. This pattern has been observed for amphibians in a comparison between Uxpanapa-Chimalapas zone and the same tropical regions (except from La Sepultura) used in this study, and can be explained by the high number of recorded species in these three sites and the high number of species that they share. The Selva Zoque reptile fauna has a combined component of species from two different biogeographic provinces (
Our results suggest that Selva Zoque is a priority conservation area for the reptile fauna of Mexico because a relatively high proportion (43%) of the species that inhabit there are in high-risk of extinction categories in the NOM-059; equivalent to 33% of all the Mexican reptile species included in this initiative (
Reptile species in high extinction-risk categories by IUCN, NOM or
The extensive areas of well-preserved forest in Selva Zoque are mostly located in the Chimalapas zone and El Ocote Biosphere Reserve (
The implementation of activities proven to be effective in the conservation of reptiles in transformed landscapes in the study region is desirable. These could include: 1) ecological restoration (
The authors thank A. Vinalay, C. Nochebuena, D. Aportela, L. Vázquez, L. Alcaide, J. López, M. Oropeza, R. Flores, J. Pelayo, I. Caviedes, F. Vázquez, C. Hernández, and U. García for helping with the fieldwork. Policarpo Ronzón, L. Feria, and A. Vázquez provided logistical support for the trips to the field. The authors are grateful to M. López-Luna for providing the photograph of
List of native reptile species recorded in the Selva Zoque region and seven other regions in northern Mesoamerica, their distribution range and conservation status. Abbreviations: a = species recorded during our fieldwork.
Species | Distribution range | Selva Zoque | Las Choapas | Lacandona | Los Tuxtlas | La Sepultura | Calakmul | Sian Ka'an | Mayan Forest | NOM-059 | IUCN RED LIST |
|
Category of vulnerability according to the |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Data Deficient | 18 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Endangered | 17 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Data Deficient | 18 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 18 | High | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Data Deficient | 18 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 14 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 17 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 17 | High | ||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Vulnerable | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Not evaluated | 10 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Data Deficient | 16 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 15 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 16 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Data Deficient | 17 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated | 9 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 16 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 9 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Endangered | 16 | High | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | P | Vulnerable | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 14 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Data Deficient | 15 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 15 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 11 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Data Deficient |
|
|
||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Not evaluated | 13 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 13 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Endangered | 16 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Near Threatened |
|
|
||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Data Deficient | 11 | Medium | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 17 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 11 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 17 | High | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Data Deficient | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 17 | High | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 15 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Vulnerable | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 11 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 16 | High | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
|
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated | 6 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 14 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Data Deficient | 12 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern |
|
|
||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 16 | High | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 5 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 13 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Data Deficient | 14 | High | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 14 | High | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 6 | Low | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern | 6 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 9 | Low | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 7 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 14 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 14 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Data Deficient | 16 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern |
|
|
|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Vulnerable | 12 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern |
|
|
||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 5 | Low | |
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 8 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Data Deficient | 14 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Data Deficient |
|
|
||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 9 | Low | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 12 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Not evaluated | 7 | Low | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
|
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | A | Least Concern | 7 | Low | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 8 | Low | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 13 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 17 | High | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 4 | Low | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated | 11 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 10 | Medium | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
Near Threatened | 11 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 14 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Vulnerable | 16 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Not evaluated | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Not evaluated |
|
|
||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Least Concern | 11 | Medium | ||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Least Concern |
|
|
||
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Least Concern | 12 | Medium | ||
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 15 | High | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Least Concern | 16 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 14 | High | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
|
Least Concern | 17 | High | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Vulnerable |
|
|
|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Endangered |
|
|
|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Critically Endangered |
|
|
|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | P | Critically Endangered |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
Vulnerable | 17 | High | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | P | Critically Endangered | 17 | High | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | P | Vulnerable |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
Vulnerable | 10 | Medium | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Not evaluated | 13 | Medium | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Near Threatened | 13 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A | Not evaluated | 8 | Low | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
Near Threatened | 14 | High | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | P | Near Threatened | 14 | High | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
Near Threatened | 11 | Medium | |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Least Concern | 15 | High | ||
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Not evaluated | 10 | Medium | |
|
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Not evaluated | 10 | Medium | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | A | Near Threatened | 14 | High | |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|
Vulnerable | 14 | High | |
|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Least Concern | 13 | Medium |