2urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:45048D35-BB1D-5CE8-9668-537E44BD4C7Eurn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:91BD42D4-90F1-4B45-9350-EEF175B1727AZooKeysZK1313-29891313-2970Pensoft Publishers10.3897/zookeys.966.5192151921Research ArticleLycaenidaeSystematicsCenozoicAsiaThe identity of Alfred Wallace’s mysterious butterfly taxon Lycaenanisa solved: Famegananisa comb. nov., a senior synonym of F.alsulus (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatinae)HsuYu-Fengt43018@ntnu.edu.twhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-77751Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, 116, Taiwan, ROCNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
2020090920209661531624FE5E4CD-1713-5B52-89D5-F3DC90922CCD8E1E57D3-BE4F-452A-9C86-77B1C4DB371040336791003202025052020Yu-Feng HsuThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.http://zoobank.org/8E1E57D3-BE4F-452A-9C86-77B1C4DB3710
Lycaenanisa Wallace, 1866 was described from Formosa (Taiwan) and is here recognized as a senior subjective synonym of Lycaenaalsulus Herrich-Schäffer, 1869. It is resurrected to serve as the valid name, Famegananisa (Wallace, 1866), comb nov. of the species commonly known as Fameganaalsulus. The name Zizerataiwana Sonan, 1938 (syn. nov.), also described from Formosa, is recognized as a junior subjective synonym of L.nisa. Another name, Zizeeriaalsuluseggletoni Corbet, 1941 (syn. nov.), described from Hong Kong is also considered a junior subjective synonym of L.nisa. Moreover, all former synonyms of alsulus automatically become new junior synonyms for nisa. This species occurs in the Oriental and Australian regions and western Pacific.
Hsu Y-F (2020) The identity of Alfred Wallace’s mysterious butterfly taxon Lycaena nisa solved: Famegana nisa comb. nov., a senior synonym of F. alsulus (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Polyommatinae). ZooKeys 966: 153–162. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.966.51921
Introduction
Anyone interested in natural history knows the name Alfred Russel Wallace, considered the father of zoogeography, who developed the idea of nature selection independently of Charles Darwin (Limolino et al. 2010; Beccaloni 2013). His achievements cover a variety of biological disciplines, including systematics. He described many plants and animals, mostly based on collections made by himself and his assistants. Nevertheless, he also worked on collections from other sources. A good example is a work on lepidopterous insects collected by Robert Swinhoe, an English biologist who worked as consul in Formosa (Taiwan) from 1860–1866. In collaboration with Frederic Moore, Wallace studied a collection made in Takaw [today’s Kaohsiung]. The butterfly portion of the collection was investigated by Wallace, the moth portion by Moore, and a joint paper was subsequently published as Wallace and Moore (1866). This paper has been regarded as the starting point of lepidopteran research of Taiwan (Shirôzu 1986). In this landmark work of the Lepidoptera of Taiwan, 46 diurnal species and 93 nocturnal species are mentioned. Wallace noted that most of the species in the collection were widespread species with distributions shared with India and Malay, but he recognized five species he considered distinctive and described them as new. These species were Pontianiobe Wallace, 1866, Pierisformosana Wallace, 1866, Teriasvagans Wallace, 1866, Euploeaswinhoei Wallace, 1866, and Lycaenanisa Wallace, 1866. The taxonomic status of the first four taxa have been clarified by various authors since. Pontianiobe is recognized as a subspecies of Leptosianina (Fabricius, 1793) (Pieridae) (Yata 1985; Hsu et al. 2018). Pierisformosana is generally considered as either a subspecies of Appiaslyncida Cramer, 1777 (Pieridae) (e.g., Shirôzu 1960) or a junior synonym of A.lyncidaeleonora Boisduval, 1836 (Pieridae) (e.g., Yata 1985; Hsu et al. 2018). Teriasvagans is recognized as a junior synonym of Euremalaeta (Boisduval, 1836) (Pieridae) by Yata (1989). Euploeaswinhoei is considered a subspecies of Euploeasylvester (Fabricius, 1793) (Nymphalidae) (Ackery and Vane-Wright 1984; Morishita 1985).
The status of Lycaenanisa, however, remains ambiguous and has not been re-examined (Shirôzu 1986). Matsumura (1909) changed the generic assignment of L.nisa Wallace, 1866 to the genus Zizera but without giving any explanation. Lycaenanisa was excluded from a comprehensive checklist of Taiwan butterflies by Shirôzu (1960) and Shirôzu and Ueda (1992). During visits to the Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) for a project on documenting information on the type specimens of Taiwan butterflies, the type material of L.nisa was retrieved from the Wallace collection. According to Wallace’s (1866) original description, a pair of syntypes were available for L.nisa, but only a female specimen (Figs 1–3) was successfully located in the museum. The features of the specimen fully conform to the description given by Wallace (Wallace and Moore 1866: 360–361). Interestingly, it also agrees with a species commonly known as Fameganaalsulus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) in all aspects, and these two taxa are shown to be conspecific.
As Lycaenanisa was published three years prior to Herrich-Schäffer’s Lycaenaalsulus, it takes the priority, and should be the valid name, invoking Article 23.1 of the ICZN (1999: 24). Although the name alsulus has been used for this lycaenid butterfly in the literature more than 25 times in the last 50 years, it would be inappropriate and insensitive to make efforts to suppress or abandon a name established by Wallace himself. Moreover, L.nisa was used as a valid name by Matsumura (1909) after 1899, thus the condition for reversal of precedence ruled by Article 23.9.1 (ICZN 1999: 27) is not met. In the present article, Lycaenanisa Wallace is resurrected as the valid name for this lycaenid, with a list of its synonyms.
Materials and methods
Type specimens relevant to the study were examined in the Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) and the Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung (TARI). Additional specimens were collected for comparison from Australia, Hong Kong and Hainan, with vouchers deposited in the Department of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei (NTNU).
Taxonomic accountAnimaliaLepidopteraLycaenidae0ABA4E9A-99AD-5BB1-9E99-8D73350DB319Famegananisa(Wallace, 1866)comb. nov.Figures 1–3LycaenanisaWallace, 1866: 360. Type locality: “Takaw, Formosa”.LycaenaalsulusHerrich-Schäffer, 1869: 75. Type locality: Rockhampton and Upolu [Australia]. syn. nov.LycaenaexilisLucas, 1889: 159, figs 13–15. Type locality: Cooktown to Bowen [Australia] (preoccupied by Lycaenaexilis Boisduval, 1852). syn. nov.LycaenaluluMathew, 1889: 312. Type locality: Tongatabu, [Tonga]. syn. nov.LycaenagracilisMiskin, 1890: 37. Type locality: Brisbane to Cooktown [Australia]. syn. nov.LycaenaexiloidesLucas, 1891: 47. Replacement name for Lycaenaexilis Lucas, 1889.syn. nov.Zizeranisa: Matsumura 1909: 480.Zizeeriaalsulus: Waterhouse and Lyell 1914: 106.Zizeralulu: Rothschild 1915: 390.ZizerakalawarusRibbe 1926: 91; Vane Wright and de Jong 2003: 155. Type locality: Celebes. syn. nov.Zizeraalsulus: Seitz 1927: 926.ZizerataiwanaSonan, 1938: 254. Type locality: “Inrin, Formosa.” syn. nov.ZizeeriaalsuluseggletoniCorbet 1941: 150; Ek-Amnuay 2012: 589. Type locality: Hong Kong, New territory. syn. nov.Zizinaalsulustaiwana: Shirôzu 1944: 37; Shirôzu 1960: 334; Hsu: 2013: 252.Fameganaalsulus: Eliot 1973: 453; D’Abrera 1977: 361; D’Abrera 1986: 651; Parsons 1999: 460; Braby 2000: 839; Braby 2016: 324.Fameganaalsulusalsulus: Common and Waterhouse 1981: 587.Type material examined.
Wallace: The specimen of Lycaenanisa retrieved in NHMUK,
Type specimens of Famegananisa (Wallace, 1866) 1–3 lectotype of Lycaenanisa Wallace, 1866 4–6 holotype of Lycaenataiwana Sonan, 1938 7–9 holotype of Zizeeriaalsuluseggletoni Corbet, 1941. Scale bar: 0.5 cm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/451023
Sonan: Three specimens belonging to the type series of Zizerataiwana Sonan, 1938 retrieved in TARI, reg. nos. 37, 40, 45.
Holotype (Figs 4–6)
Taiwan • ♂; “Type [round paper, red characters in red circle]”; “Inrin, 30. X. 1932 Col. J. Sonan”; “Zizerataiwana Sonan DET. J. SONAN”; “No. 37”.
Paratypes
Taiwan • 1♀ (Allotype); “Allo Type [round paper, orange characters in orange circle]”; “Inrin, 30. X. 1932 Col. J. Sonan”; “Zizerataiwana Sonan DET. J. SONAN”; “No. 45” • 1 ♀; “Para Type [round paper, green characters in green circle]”; “Inrin, 30. X. 1932 Col. J. Sonan”; “Zizerataiwana Sonan DET. J. SONAN”; “No. 40”
Corbet: Two specimens belonging to the type series of Zizeeriaalsuluseggletoni Corbet, 1941 retrieved in NHMUK with the reg. no. 720438.
Holotype
Hong Kong • ♂ (Figs 7–9); “♂ Holotype Zizeeriaalsuluseggletoni Cbt.”; “Hong Kong District. + New Territory 5. IX. 1914. R. W. Barney”, “Type H T [round label with red edge]”, “Brit. Mus. 1921-312”, “Zizeeria GENITALIA slide No. NSC. l.”
Paratype
Hong Kong • ♂; “Hong Kong District. + New Territory 5. IX. 1914 R. W. Barney”, “Type Holo-type [round label with red edge]”, “Brit. Mus. 1921-312.” Note: Although this specimen also bears a “holotype” label, the former bears a label with Corbet’s hand-written characters indicating that it is the true holotype.
Additional material examined.
Australia • 2 ♂ 2♀; Queensland, Mt. Stuart; 26 March 2017; Y. F. Hsu and M. Braby leg.; 1♂ 1♀; Queensland, Cairns, 30 March 2017; Y. F. Hsu and M. Braby leg. Hong Kong; 1♂; Yuen Long District, Shek Wu Wai; 14 October 2009; Y. F. Lo and W. L. Hui leg; 1♀; Ching Mun CP, Tai Mo Shan; 500m; 20. October. 2009; W. L. Hui leg; 1♀; New Territory, Ngau Tam Mei; 100m; 17 December 2018; Y. F. Hsu leg. Hainan• 3♂; Dongfang, Donghe, Nanran; 18 April 2010; Y. F. Lo leg.
Descriptions.
Lectotype of Lycaenanisa
Female (Figs 1, 2). Forewing length 10.9 mm. Head hairy, brown, with medial white band on frons. Antennae dark brown, segmented with white. Proboscis brown. Labial palpus hairy, porrect; third segment slender, pointed at distal end, white but brown dorsally. Compound eyes smooth. Thorax and abdomen dark brown dorsally, white ventrally. Forewing broad, somewhat elongate, termen slightly convex. Hindwing rounded. Wing uppersides uniformly brown. Wing undersides ground color white tinged with gray, spotless except for presence of submarginal bands consisted of faint narrow bands proximally and a series of faint brown spots distally along termen of both wings; dot in cell CuA1 prominent, black. Fringe white.
Holotype of Lycaenataiwana
Male (Figs 4, 5). Forewing length 10.9 mm. Morphology conformed to those of L.nisa, except metallic purple patches present on uppersides of both wings proximally and those on hindwings.
Holotype of Zizeeriaalsuluseggletoni
Male (Figs 7, 8). Forewing length 11.4 mm. Morphology conformed to those of L.nisa, except metallic purple patches present on uppersides of both wings proximally, and those on hindwings; submarginal bands on wing undersides slightly paler than those of L.nisa and L.taiwana.
Distribution.
This species occurs in the Oriental and Australian regions, and western Pacific, including southern China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Thailand, Sulawesi, Australia, the Torres Strait islands, Vanuatu, Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga (Eliot 1973; Braby 2000; Vane Wright and de Jong 2003; Ek-Amnuay 2012).
Biology.
Larval hostplants of Famegananisa have been reported to include various legume species, such as Cajanusacutifolius (F.Muell. ex Benth.) Maesen, C.pubescens (Ewart & Morrison) Maesen, Desmodiumelegans Candolle, Flemingiamacrophylla (Willd.) Merr., Indigoferapratensis F. Muell., Galactiatenuiflora (Klein ex Willdenow) Wight & Arnott, Phyllodiumpulchellum (Linnaeus) Desvaux., Tephrosiapurpurea (L.) Pers., Vignalanceolata Benth., V.radiata (L.) Wilczek and V.vexillata (L.) A. Rich (all Fabaceae) (Bascombe et al. 1999; Braby 2000, 2016). Life histories are illustrated and described in Bascombe et al. (1999). Eggs are laid near flowers, upon which the larvae feed. Facultative mymecophily does occur.
Discussion
Famegananisa dwells on open, grassy habitats, as suggested by its common names ‘Grass Blue’ (e.g., Kimura et al. 2014), ‘Small Grass Blue’ (e.g., Bascombe et al. 1999) or ‘Black-spotted Grass Blue’ (e.g., Braby 2000; Orr and Kitching 2010). This habitat is shared with members of several Polyommatinae, such as Zizeeria, Zizula or Zizina, but Famegana can easily be distinguished by its uniformly grayish white undersides of wings, with a single prominent black spot in the cell CuA1 of hindwing, and obscure submarginal bands (Common and Waterhouse 1981; Bascombe et al. 1999; Braby 2000; Orr and Kitching 2010). Its male genitalia are also peculiar (Common and Waterhouse 1981), leading Eliot (1973) to establish a monospecific genus for it, stating “unlike those of any other species known to me, the principal peculiarity being the very stout brachia which are hinged wholly to the lateral processes of the tegumen and are capable of only limited movement”. The male genitalia of the species have been illustrated in the literature, including Shirôzu (1960), Eliot (1973), and Bascombe et al. (1999) and are unique in the family Lycaenidae. Although up to four subspecies have been recognized, this species is poorly marked and seasonably variable in wing pattern, and subspecific delimitation is perhaps unnecessary for this species. Specimens in dry season have a reduced black spot, darker ground color on wing undersides, and more distinct submarginal bands on the hindwing undersides (Figs 14–17) when compared to those in wet season (Figs 10–13) according to Bascombe et al. (1999) and Braby (2000).
Specimens of Famegananisa (Wallace, 1866) 10, 11 male, Queensland, Cairns 12, 13 female, Queensland, Mt. Stuart 14, 15 male. Hong Kong, Yuen Long District, Shek Wu Wai 16, 17 female, Hong Kong, Ching Mun CP, Tai Mo Shan. Scale bar: 0.5 cm.
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/451024
In addition to the name Lycaenanisa of Wallace, another name from Taiwan is available for the species, Zizerataiwana Sonan, 1938. Shirôzu (1944) pointed out that Z.taiwana is conspecific with Z.alsulus based on examination of the male genitalia, but retained taiwana as a subspecies of Z.alsulus. However, as mentioned above, there is no doubt that Z.taiwana represents a junior subjective synonym of L.nisa. Moreover, the population from southern China has been assigned to ssp.eggletoni Corbet, 1941, originally described from Hong Kong (Bascombe et al. 1999). As already pointed out by Shirôzu (1944), the specimens from Hong Kong (Figs 14–17), however, are indistinguishable from those from Taiwan (Figs 1–6). Consequently, eggletoni Corbet, 1941 should also be regarded as a junior subjective synonym of L.nisa Wallace, 1866.
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by grants of Taiwan Forestry Bureau, COA, Taipei, Taiwan, 101-FM-2.1-C-12 and 107-FD-8.2-C-16(1). The author thanks George Beccaloni and Blanca Huertas (NHMUK) for locating type specimens in the Wallace collection under their care, and for permission to use the photographs of the types. Chi-Feng Lee (TARI) helped locating type specimens in the Sonan collection. Michael Braby (The Australian National University, Acton) and Philip Lo (Kadoorie Farm, Hong Kong) kindly assisted in field work. Jia-Yuan Liang (NTNU) prepared the plates. I also express my cordial thanks to Rienk de Jong (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden), Toshiya Hirowatari (Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka), and Erik J Van Nieukerken (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden) for giving many useful comments.
ReferencesAckeryPRVane-WrightRI (1984) Department of Entomology, British Museum (Natural History), London, 425 pp.BascombeMJJohnstonGBascombeFS (1999) The Butterflies of Hong Kong. Academic Press, London, x + 422 pp.BeccaloniG (2013) Alfred Russel Wallace and Natural Selection: the Real Story, 4 pp. http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/tv/junglehero/alfred-wallace-biography.pdfBrabyMF (2000) CSIRO, Collingwood, 976 pp. https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643100770BrabyMF (2016) CSIRO, Collingwood, 384 pp. https://doi.org/10.1071/9781486301010CommonIFBWaterhouseDF (1981) Angus & Robertson Publishers, Sydney, 682 pp.Corbet (1941) A list of the butterflies of Hong Kong. Hong Kong Naturalist 10 (3/4): 148–165. https://hkjo.lib.hku.hk/exhibits/show/hkjo/browseArticle?book=b27722454&issue=270036D’AbreraB (1977) Hill House, Victoria, 415 pp.D’AbreraB (1986) Butterflies of the Oriental Region, Part III. Hill House, Victoria, 536–672.Ek-AmnuayP (2012) Baan Lae Suan Amarin Printing and Publishing, Bangkok, 943 pp.EliotJN (1973) The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement.28: 371–505. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.11171Herrich-SchäfferGAW (1869) Neue Schmetterlinge aus dem “Museum Godeffroy” in Hamburg.30(1–3): 65–80.HsuYF (2013) Morning Star Publishing Inc., Taichung, 333 pp. [In Chinese]HsuYFHuangCLLiangJY (2018) Forest Bureau, Council of Agricultural Executive Yuan, Taipei, 224 pp.ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edition, The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999, London, 306 pp.KimuraYAokiTYamaguchiSUémuraYSaitoT (2014) Mokuyosha, Tokyo, 245 pp.LimolinoMVRiddleBRWhittakerRJBrownJH (2010) Sinauer Association Inc., Sunderland, 878 pp.LucasTP (1889) Six new species of Rhopalocera.6(4): 151–161.LucasTP (1891) Correction. Six new species of Rhopalocera.7(1): 47.MatsumuraS (1909) A list of Formosan butterflies.253: 479–481. [In Japanese]MathewGF (1889) Descriptions and life-histories of new species of Rhopalocera from the Western Pacific.1889: 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1889.tb02323.xMiskinWH (1890) Descriptions of hitherto undescribed Australian Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera) principally Lycaenidae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales (2) 5(1): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.18623MorishitaK (1985) Danaidae. In: TsukadaE (Ed.) Butterflies of the South East Asian Islands., 439–604.OrrAKitchingR (2010) The Butterflies of Australia. Jacana Books, Crows Nest, 296 + 31 pp.ParsonsM (1999) Academic Press, London & San Diego, 736 pp. [+ 136 pls.]RibbeC (1926) Neue Lycaenenformen, hauptsächlich von Celebes (Lep. Lycaenidae).15: 78–91.RothschildFRS (1915) On the Lepidoptera in the Tring Museum sent by Mr. A. S. Meek from the Admirality Islands, Dampier, and Vulcan Islands.22(3): 387–402. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.1918SeitzA (1927) Genus Zizera. In: ZeitzA (Ed.) The Macrolepidoptera of the World, Vol., 925–926.SonanJ (1938) Notes on some butterflies from Formosa (5).7: 250–256. [In Japanese]ShirôzuT (1944) Notes on some Formosan Butterflies (1).14(1): 30–42. [In Japanese]ShirôzuT (1960) Hoikusha, Osaka, 481 pp. [In Japanese]ShirôzuT (1986) Bibliographical notes. In: HamanoE (Ed.) Ecological Encyclopedia of Taiwanese Butterflies., 352–474. [In Japanese]ShirôzuTUedaK (1992) Lycaenidae. In: Heppner JB, Inoue H (Eds) Association for Tropical Lepidoptera, Gainesville, 136–139.WaterhouseGALyellG (1914) Angus & Robertson Publishers, Sydney, 239 pp.Vane WrightDde JongR (2003) The Butterflies of Sulawesi: Annotated Checklist for a Critical Island Fauna.343: 1–267. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254911978_The_butterflies_of_Sulawesi_Annotated_checklist_for_a_critical_island_faunaWallaceARMooreF (1866) List of Lepidopterous insects collected at Takaw, Formosa, by Mr. Robert Swinhoe.1866: 355–365.YataO (1985) Pieridae. In: TsukadaE (Ed.) Butterflies of the South East Asian Islands., 5–438.YataO (1989) A revision of the Old World species of the genus Eurema Hubner (Lepidoptera, Pieridae), Part I. Phylogeny and zoogeography of the subgenus TeriasSwainson and description of thesubgenusEurema Hübner.9: 1–103.