2urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:45048D35-BB1D-5CE8-9668-537E44BD4C7Eurn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:91BD42D4-90F1-4B45-9350-EEF175B1727AZooKeysZK1313-29891313-2970Pensoft Publishers10.3897/zookeys.374.65533239Research ArticleCiidaeNomenclatureTaxonomyNeogeneWorldLectotype designations and nomenclatural changes in Xylographus Mellié (Coleoptera, Ciidae)Sandoval-GómezVivian Eliana1Lopes-AndradeCristiano2LawrenceJohn F.3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia, Departamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosa - MGBrazilDepartamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-900, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazilAustralian National Insect Collection, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaAustralian National Insect Collection, CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesThe PalmsAustralia
201428120143742343FFBB2373-8061-1814-FFB0-FFC82D18CB0D57769241120131512014Vivian Eliana Sandoval-Gómez, Cristiano Lopes-Andrade, John F. LawrenceThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
We designate lectotypes and propose nomenclatural changes in Xylographus Mellié (Coleoptera, Ciidae) based on type specimens deposited in the Museum of Comparative Zoology (USA), Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Germany), the Natural History Museum (UK), Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de la Ville de Genève (Switzerland), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (France), Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet (Sweden) and Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (Austria). We designate lectotypes for the following species: Cis fultoni Broun, 1886, Xylographus anthracinus Mellié, 1849, X. bicolor Pic, 1916, X. brasiliensis Pic, 1916, X. ceylonicus Ancey, 1876, X. contractus Mellié, 1849, X. corpulentus Mellié, 1849, X. dentatus Pic, 1922, X. gibbus Mellié, 1849, X. hypocritus Mellié, 1849, X. javanus Pic, 1937, X. lemoulti Pic, 1916, X. longicollis Pic, 1922, X. madagascariensis Mellié, 1849, X. nitidissimus Pic, 1916, X. perforatus Gerstaecker, 1871, X. porcus Gorham, 1886, X. punctatus Mellié, 1849, X. ritsemai Pic, 1921, X. rufescens Pic, 1921, X. rufipennis Pic, 1934, X. rufipes Pic, 1930, X. seychellensis Scott, 1926, X. subopacus Pic, 1929, X. subsinuatus Pic, 1916, X. suillus Gorham, 1886, X. testaceitarsis Pic, 1916 and X. tomicoides Reitter, 1902. We propose the following syn. n. (senior synonym listed first): X. anthracinus = X. testaceitarsis, X. brasiliensis = X. lucasi Lopes-Andrade & Zacaro, X. corpulentus = X. lemoulti and X. richardi Mellié, X. madagascariensis = X. eichelbaumi Reitter, X. rufipennis, X. seychellensis Scott and X. tarsalis Fåhraeus, X. nitidissimus = X. longicollis, X. subsinuatus = X. rufescens. We exclude three species from Xylographus: Cis renominatus, nom. n. (for X. dentatus Pic, 1922, not C. dentatus Mellié, 1849), Paratrichapus fultoni (Broun, 1886), comb. n. and P. javanus (Pic, 1937), comb. n.
Sandoval-Gómez VE, Lopes-Andrade C, Lawrence JF (2014) Lectotype designations and nomenclatural changes in Xylographus Mellié (Coleoptera, Ciidae). ZooKeys 374: 23–43. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.374.6553
Introduction
Xylographus Mellié (Coleoptera, Ciidae, Orophiini) is a genus of minute tree-fungus beetles with 36 described species, occurring in most continental and insular lands of tropical and subtropical regions (Lawrence and Lopes-Andrade 2010, Sandoval-Gómez et al. 2011). The name Xylographus was mentioned for the first time in the catalogue of Dejean (1835), but became available only after its description by Mellié (1847). Six species names were cited in the original description of the genus, but only one of them was available, Cis bostrichoides Dufour, 1843, being its type species by monotypy. Afterwards, Mellié (1849) described the other five species and proposed three more, respectively: Xylographus anthracinus Mellié, 1849, Xylographus contractus Mellié, 1849, Xylographus corpulentus Mellié, 1849, Xylographus gibbus Mellié, 1849, Xylographus hypocritus Mellié, 1849, Xylographus madagascariensis Mellié, 1849, Xylographus punctatus Mellié, 1849 and Xylographus richardi Mellié, 1849. Moreover, he synonymized Cis cribatus Lucas, 1849 with Xylographus bostrichoides.
In the late XIX century, six species of Xylographus were described: Xylographus perforatus Gerstaecker, 1871, Xylographus tarsalis Fåhraeus, 1871, Xylographus ceylonicus Ancey, 1876, Xylographus latirostris Gorham, 1886, Xylographus porcus Gorham, 1886 and Xylographus suillus Gorham, 1886. Xylographus latirostris was later transferred to Ceracis Mellié, 1847 by Lawrence (1971) and Cis fultoni Broun, 1886 to Xylographus by Kuschel (1990).
The first half of the XX century was marked by a considerable increase in number of Xylographus, with the description of 19 species. Edmund Reitter described three species: Xylographus tomicoides Reitter, 1902, Xylographus eichelbaumi Reitter, 1908 and Xylographus globipennis Reitter, 1911. Maurice Pic was the most prolific author, describing 14 species: Xylographus bicolor Pic, 1916a, Xylographus brasiliensis Pic, 1916a, Xylographus lemoulti Pic, 1916b, Xylographus nitidissimus Pic, 1916a, Xylographus subsinuatus Pic, 1916b, Xylographus testaceitarsis Pic, 1916a, Xylographus ritsemai Pic, 1921, Xylographus rufescens Pic, 1921, Xylographus dentatus Pic, 1922, Xylographus longicollis Pic, 1922, Xylographus subopacus Pic, 1929, Xylographus rufipes Pic, 1930, Xylographus rufipennis Pic, 1934 and Xylographus javanus Pic, 1937. However, these species are difficult to recognize, because their original descriptions are very brief, lacking adequate diagnostic characteristics and some of them may constitute synonyms of species previously proposed by other authors (Sandoval-Gómez et al. 2011). Scott (1926) described Xylographus seychellensis, but indicated that it could be a synonym of one of the Afrotropical species described by Pic, which he could not examine. Blair (1940) described Xylographus bynoei.
In the second half of the XX century only two species were described: Xylographus nakanei Nobuchi, 1955 and Xylographus scheerpeltzi Nobuchi & Wada, 1956. Xylographus nakanei was proposed as junior synonym of Paraxestocis unicornis Miyatake, 1954 by Kawanabe (1995). Finally, after almost a half century without new descriptions of Xylographus, Xylographus lucasi was described by Lopes-Andrade and Zacaro (2003). Ferrer (1997) designated lectotypes of Xylographus species described by Fåhraeus (1871) and Reitter (1908). Later, in a paper on the Afrotropical Xylographus globipennis, its lectotype was designated (Sandoval-Gómez et al. 2011).
Recently we had the opportunity to examine type material of the most important historical collections of Xylographus. During this work, we noted that some species should be excluded from the genus and several synonyms were recognized. It is necessary to propose these nomenclatural acts now, before finishing the revision of Xylographus, because some names will soon be cited in ecological, cytotaxonomic and phylogenetic works on ciids. As most descriptions of Xylographus are based on syntypes, lectotype designations are necessary to fix clearly the concept of the names and to ensure the universal and consistent interpretation of them.
Material and methods
We examined 195 type specimens of Xylographus from the following institutions (preceded by acronyms used in this paper):
MCZ
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)
MFNB
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Berlin, Germany)
MHNG
Muséum d’histoire naturelle de la ville de Genève (Geneva, Switzerland)
MNHN
Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France)
NHM
The Natural History Museum (London, United Kingdom)
NHMW
Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (Wien, Austria)
NHRS
Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet (Stockholm, Sweden)
We used the generic features of Xylographus cited by Sandoval-Gómez et al. (2011), the most important features proposed by Lawrence (1971) to recognize Cis, and the original description of Paratrichapus by Scott (1926), for making decisions on generic placement. Paratrichapus was described as having a 3-3-3 tarsal formula, but after studying its type material and images of microscope slide preparations by Hugh Scott, we observed that it was certainly 4-4-4 as in all other ciids. Xylographus and Paratrichapus are morphologically similar, so we propose the characteristics stated on Table 1 to differentiate them.
Main differences between Xylographus Mellié and Paratrichapus Scott.
Features
Xylographus
Paratrichapus
left mandible usually bearing an upward tooth in males
present in most species
absent
first labial palpomere
elongate, as long as or longer than the second one
shorter than the second one
pronotum punctation
dual, fine to coarse
single, always deep and coarse
prosternum
concave
biconcave
elytral length/elytral width
less than 1.15
more than 1.15
elytral length/pronotal length
less than 1.4
more than 1.4
protibial socketed spines
extending from the apex to almost its base
extending from the apex to at most its middle
first and second tarsomeres
subconical and well separated
subcylindrical and contiguous
We have not located the types of Xylographus bostrichoides and Xylographus richardi. And we did not have access to type material of Xylographus scheerpeltzi. In the case of Xylographus bostrichoides, we had at hand several named historical specimens, including those used for its redescription by Mellié (1849). In the case of Xylographus richardi, we had only a named specimen for examination. The description of Xylographus scheerpeltzi is adequately detailed and includes information on the morphology of sclerites of male abdominal terminalia. In all other cases, we had access to the original type series and dissected male abdominal terminalia whenever necessary and possible. The morphology of sclerites of male abdominal terminalia of Ciidae is stable intraspecifically and distinctly varies interspecifically, even between closely related species (Antunes-Carvalho and Lopes-Andrade 2013, Oliveira et al. 2013).
We propose ten synonymies among the currently available names in Xylographus. For us, these are the most obvious cases that need solution. These names were proposed based on slight color differences (for instance, those observed in teneral adults), subtle variations of male secondary sexual characteristics or based only on females. A single author, Maurice Pic, was responsible for half of the names here recognized as junior synonyms. He is known for having proposed thousands of new names of beetles based mostly on anecdotal descriptions and small type-series. Lack of access to type material was also a great problem. Scott (1926) described Xylographus seychellensis stating that he did it with some hesitation, because he has not examined possible conspecifics, as Xylographus madagascariensis and Xylographus eichelbaumi, the senior and a junior synonym proposed here, respectively. The same was true to Xylographus lucasi, whose authors (Lopes-Andrade and Zacaro 2003) described it without examining the type of Xylographus brasiliensis, recognized here as its senior synonym.
A complete list of Xylographus species is given in alphabetical order. Type-locality and synonyms, if any, are given for each species. Type series and type material of its synonyms are given only for species that we could examine in museums. Syntypes of species treated in this work were almost all labeled as lectotypes and paralectotypes by John F. Lawrence in 1965, but they were not officially designated in the literature. We reexamined all specimens and preferred to maintain Lawrence’s labels in most cases to avoid future inconsistencies. We designated a lectotype in cases where a single specimen was located and the author of the species name did not state whether there was one or more than one specimen in the type series. We consider a specimen to be the holotype only when the author clearly stated there was a single specimen available for description. When exact label data are listed, a backslash (\) separates individual labels. Data in square brackets were added for clarification. Remarks are provided for some species.
Taxonomic synopsis
Xylographus anthracinus Mellié, 1849
Xylographus testaceitarsis Pic, 1916, syn. n.
Xylographus bicolor Pic, 1916
Xylographus bostrichoides (Dufour, 1843)
Cis cribatus Lucas, 1849
Xylographus bostrichoides var. aubei Mellié, 1849
Xylographus brasiliensis Pic, 1916
Xylographus lucasi Lopes-Andrade & Zacaro, 2003, syn. n.
Xylographus bynoei Blair, 1940
Xylographus ceylonicus Ancey, 1876
Xylographus contractus Mellié, 1849
Xylographus corpulentus Mellié, 1849
Xylographus lemoulti Pic, 1916, syn. n.
Xylographus richardi Mellié, 1849, syn. n.
Xylographus gibbus Mellié, 1849
Xylographus globipennis Reitter, 1911
Xylographus hypocritus Mellié, 1849
Xylographus madagascariensis Mellié, 1849
Xylographus eichelbaumi Reitter, 1908, syn. n.
Xylographus rufipennis Pic, 1934, syn. n.
Xylographus seychellensis Scott, 1926, syn. n.
Xylographus tarsalis Fåhraeus, 1871, syn. n.
Xylographus nitidissimus Pic, 1916
Xylographus longicollis Pic, 1922, syn. n.
Xylographus perforatus Gerstaecker, 1871
Xylographus porcus Gorham, 1886
Xylographus punctatus Mellié, 1849
Xylographus ritsemai Pic, 1921
Xylographus rufipes Pic, 1930
Xylographus scheerpeltzi Nobuchi & Wada, 1956
Xylographus subopacus Pic, 1929
Xylographus subsinuatus Pic, 1916
Xylographus rufescens Pic, 1921, syn. n.
Xylographus suillus Gorham, 1886
Xylographus tomicoides Reitter, 1902
Excluded species
Cis renominatus, nom. n.
Xylographus dentatus Pic, 1922, not Cis dentatus Mellié, 1849.
Paratrichapus fultoni (Broun, 1886), comb. n.
Cis fultoni Broun, 1886
Paratrichapus javanus (Pic, 1937), comb. n.
Xylographus javanus Pic, 1937
Species accounts37374160-F9E5-5063-AC34-310D08B9CDD5Xylographusanthracinushttp://species-id.net/wiki/Xylographus_anthracinusMellié, 1849Xylographus anthracinusMellié 1849: 222, pl. 9, fig. 17. Type-locality: Madagascar.Xylographus testaceitarsis Pic 1916: 13., syn. n. Type-locality: Mahatsinjo, Madagascar.Type series.
MADAGASCAR: male lectotype (MNHN) of Xylographus testaceitarsis Pic 1916, here designated, labeled: “MAHATSINJO près Tananarive [printed] \ Type [handwritten] \ testaceitarsis Pic [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus testaceitarsis Pic [handwritten]”; 1 male and 3 female paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “MAHATSINJO près Tananarive [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus testaceitarsis Pic [handwritten]”.
Remarks.
There is no morphological difference between the lectotype of Xylographus anthracinus and the lectotype of Xylographus testaceitarsis. They are males of about the same size and with secondary sexual characteristic similarly developed. We have also dissected and compared sclerites of their abdominal terminalia and noted no difference.
Unfortunately we did not find the type material of Dufour in the MNHN. We have found only specimens used by Mellié (1849) to redescribe this species and to describe its variety aubei, and dozens of specimens that do fit the currently accepted species limits. Müller et al. (2001) labeled one specimen deposited in MFNB as syntype of Xylographus bostrichoides. However, after studying this specimen, we determined it is a member of Scolytinae (Curculionidae) and fits neither the original description by Dufour (1843) nor the redescription by Mellié (1849). Therefore, a lectotype is not designated here.
6FBD190D-AE85-34F0-C77E-F858C713C802Xylographusbrasiliensishttp://species-id.net/wiki/Xylographus_brasiliensisPic, 1916Xylographus brasiliensis Pic 1916: 13. Type-locality: Rio Verde, Brazil.Xylographus lucasiLopes-Andrade and Zacaro 2003: 1. syn. n. Type-locality: Venda Nova do Imigrante, Espírito Santo, Brazil.Type series.
BRASIL: female lectotype (MNHN), here designated, labeled: “Bresil. Goyaz. Rio Verde [printed] \ Xylographus [handwritten] \ Type [handwritten] \ Brasiliensis Pic [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus brasiliensis Pic [handwritten]”.
Type material of the junior synonym.
See Lopes-Andrade and Zacaro (2003).
Remarks.
In the description of Xylographus lucasi, the authors did not have access to type specimens of Xylographus brasiliensis and stated that its description was vague (Lopes-Andrade and Lawrence 2003). After we examined the available type of Xylographus brasiliensis, a female located in the MNHN, we observed there is no difference between it and female paratypes of Xylographus lucasi. We have located in the MNHN a male specimen collected in “Goyaz” (which may correspond to the current state of Goiás or to Tocantins), a historical specimen but not from the original type series of Xylographus brasiliensis. We dissected it and compared the sclerites of abdominal terminalia to those of male paratypes of Xylographus lucasi, and they are exactly the same. The species is widespread in the tropical South America and the type localities of both names are within its known range (pers. obs.).
FRENCH GUIANA: male lectotype (MNHN) of Xylographus lemoulti Pic, 1916, here designated, labeled: “NOVEMBRE [printed] \ [green label] GUYANE FRANÇAISE St-LAURENT du MARONI [printed] \ [green label] COLL LE MOULT [printed] \ Type [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus lemoulti Pic [handwritten]”; 3 male and 2 female paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “NOVEMBRE [printed] \ [green label] GUYANE FRANÇAISE St-LAURENT du MARONI [printed] \ [green label] COLL LE MOULT [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus lemoulti Pic [handwritten]”; 2 male and 1 female paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “NOVEMBRE [printed] \ GUYANE FRANÇAISE St-LAURENT du MARONI [printed] \ COLL LE MOULT [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus lemoulti Pic [handwritten]”; 1 male paralectotype (MNHN), labeled: “NOVEMBRE [printed] \ GUYANE FRANÇAISE St-LAURENT du MARONI [printed] \ COLL LE MOULT [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus lemoulti Pic [handwritten]”; 3 male and 4 female paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “OCTOBRE [printed] \ GUYANE FRANÇAISE St-LAURENT du MARONI [printed] \ COLL LE MOULT [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus lemoulti Pic [handwritten]”; 1 male and 3 female paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “JUIN [printed] \ [green label] GUYANE FRANÇAISE St-LAURENT du MARONI [printed] \ [green label] COLL LE MOULT [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus lemoulti Pic [handwritten]”; 1 male paralectotype (MNHN), labeled: “MAI [printed] \ GUYANE FRANÇAISE St-LAURENT du MARONI [printed] \ COLL LE MOULT [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus lemoulti Pic [handwritten]”.
Remarks.
There are several type specimens of species described by Mellié deposited in historical collections of the MHNG and the MNHN. In the MHNG, these types are in the A. Melly collection, who has a surname similar to that of J. Mellié but shall not be confounded. We did not find type material of Xylographus richardi in the Chevrolat collection of MNHN. We located a female specimen from Colombia in the Melly collection of MHNG named as Xylographus richardi. Mellié (1849) mentioned he has examined specimens from both the Chevrolat and the Melly collections, therefore there is a possibility that this single specimen we located in the Melly collection is a syntype, but we cannot assure this. We compared this female with female paralectotypes of Xylographus corpulentus and Xylographus lemoulti and they are exactly the same. Mellié (1849) provided few differences between Xylographus corpulentus and Xylographus richardi, stating that they resemble each other “pour la taille et la forme”, with Xylographus richardi being more punctate. We believe the description of Xylographus richardi was based on a female specimen, because the pronotal surface between punctures is described as being finely rugose. We have observed that it is common in female Xylographus species to have pronotal surface distinctly more rugose than that of males. The type of Xylographus corpulentus was described as being black, while the one of Xylographus richardi was described as reddish. It is a common variation found in Xylographus corpulentus, in which teneral adults may be reddish (pers. obs.). Pic (1916b) mentioned that Xylographus lemoulti differs from Xylographus richardi in the coloration and pronotal shape, again a consequence of the fact that the description of Xylographus richardi was based in a teneral adult female. The type-localities of Xylographus lemoulti and Xylographus richardi are approximately 200 Km apart and both are in the coast of French Guiana.
KENYA: female lectotype (NHM) of Xylographus rufipennis Pic, 1934, here designated, labeled: “[red disc]Type [printed] \ R. E, DENT GURA R, 7500 AUG 1929 [printed] \ Xylographus rufipennis n. sp. [handwritten] \ Pres. By Imp. Inst. Ent B. M. 1934-42. [printed] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus rufipennis Pic [handwritten]”; 1 female paralectotype (MNHN), labeled: “R. E, DENT GURA R, 7500 AUG 1929 [printed] \ Xylographus rufipennis n. sp [handwritten] \ ex. British museum [handwritten] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus rufipennis Pic [handwritten]”. SEYCHELLES: male lectotype (NHM) of Xylographus seychellensisScott 1926, here designated, labeled: “[purple disc] LECTOTYPE [printed] \ Mahe, 1908-9 Seychelles Exp. [printed] \ Percy Sladen Trust Exped. Brit. Mus. 1926-246. [printed] \ Xylographus seychellensis, Scott TYPE. ♂. [handwritten] \ Figured specimen [printed] (outline whole vis) [handwritten] \ TYPE [printed] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus seychellensis Scott [handwritten]”. SOUTH AFRICA: male lectotype (NHRS) of Xylographus tarsalisFåhraeus 1871, labeled: “Caffraria [printed] \ J. Wahlb. [printed] \ ♂ [printed] \ [red label] Lectotype ♂ Xylographus tarsalis FÅHR. Det. Julio Ferrer 1995 [handwritten] \ [green label] Riksmuseum Stockholm [printed]”; 1 male and 1 female paralectotypes (NHRS), labeled: “Caffraria [printed] \ J. Wahlb. [printed] \ [red label] Paralectotype Xylographus tarsalis FÅHR. Det. Julio Ferrer 1995 [handwritten] \ [green label] Riksmuseum Stockholm [printed]”. TANZANIA: female holotype (NHMW) of Xylographus eichelbaumiReitter 1908, labeled: “6. [handwritten] \ Amani [printed] \ D. O. Afrika Eichelbaum’03 [printed] \ 13 April 1903 in Fomes nigrolachatus [handwritten] \ Amani. Deutsch Ostafr. [handwritten] \ Xylographus eichelbaumi m. Typ. 1907. [handwritten] \ Eichelbaumi Usambara Reitt. [handwritten] \ [red label] HOLOTYPE Xylographus eichelbaumi Reitt. [handwritten]”.
Remarks.
Scott (1926) stated he has not examined the type of Xylographus madagascariensis and that he described Xylographus seychellensis with some hesitation. If he had examined the known male type of Xylographus madagascariensis, he would have observed that it was just slightly more elongate than the specimens he had at hand, with no other differences. Such a small difference in body elongation is expected to occur in Xylographus species with broad geopraphical distribution (see, for instance, the known variation in Xylographus globipennis; Sandoval-Gómez et al. 2011). In order to make sure they were all conspecifics, we dissected named male Xylographus seychellensis compared to the type and also the lectotype of Xylographus madagascariensis, and we observed the sclerites of abdominal terminalia to be exactly the same. The lectotype of Xylographus tarsalis is a male Xylographus madagascariensis with weak secondary sexual characteristics. Ferrer (1997) stated that two female paralectotypes of Xylographus tarsalis were deposited in NHRS. After studying the material, we have seen that they are a male and a female instead. The names Xylographus eichelbaumi and Xylographus rufipennis were based on females, which clearly correspond to females named Xylographus madagascariensis that we examined.
5578A8F1-DCA5-7FCF-4EAE-FADA5D1536BDXylographusnitidissimushttp://species-id.net/wiki/Xylographus_nitidissimusPic, 1916Xylographus nitidissimus Pic 1916: 13. Type-locality: São Tomé, São Tomé and Príncipe.Xylographus longicollisPic 1922: 8. syn. n. Type-locality: Dahomey, Benin.Type series.
SÃO TOMÉ AND PRÍNCIPE: male lectotype (MNHN) of Xylographus nitidissimus Pic 1916, here designated, labeled: “[green label] San. Thomé [printed] \ n. sp. [handwritten] \ type [handwritten] \ nitidissimus Pic [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus nitidissimus Pic [handwritten]”; 1 male paralectotype (MNHN), labeled: “type [handwritten] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus nitidissimus Pic [handwritten]”; 4 male and 4 female paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “San Thomé [handwritten] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus nitidissimus Pic [handwritten]”.
Nobuchi and Wada (1956) described this species based on a series of 28 syntypes from five different localities in Japan. We did not have access to material of Mr. T. Nakane’s collection from the Hokkaido University Museum, so a lectotype for this species is not designated here.
02E1A98F-FFC7-32B8-BF7F-E04B26F57959Xylographussubopacushttp://species-id.net/wiki/Xylographus_subopacusPic, 1929Xylographus subopacusPic 1929: 264. Type-locality: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Elisabethville.Type series.
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO: female lectotype (NHM), here designated, labeled: “[purple disc] LECTOTYPE [printed] \ BELGIAN CONGO. 18 m. S. W. of Elizabethville. 24.iii.1928. Dr. H. S. Evans. [printed] \ Pres. by Imp. Inst. Ent. Brit. Mus. 1932-147. [printed] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus subopacus Pic [handwritten]”; 1 female paralectotype (MNHN), labeled: “BELGIAN CONGO. 18 m. S. W. of Elizabethville. 1928. Dr. H. S. Evans. [printed] \ Xylographus subopacus n. sp. [handwritten] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus subopacus Pic [handwritten]”.
03E3B85F-92FA-C940-FDD1-0042C3A2CF02Xylographussubsinuatushttp://species-id.net/wiki/Xylographus_subsinuatusPic, 1916Xylographus subsinuatus Pic 1916: 4. Type-locality: Madagascar.Xylographus rufescensPic 1921: 7. syn. n. Type-locality: Bourbon Island (Reunion).Type series.
MADAGASCAR: male lectotype (MNHN), here designated, labeled: “MADAGASCAR Plantations du Sambirano COLLECTION LE MOULT [printed] \ [red label] Coll. C [handwritten] \ Type [handwritten] \ subsinuatus Pic [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus subsinuatus Pic [handwritten]”; 6 males, 3 females, 17 specimens of undetermined gender, all paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “MADAGASCAR Plantations du Sambirano COLLECTION LE MOULT [printed] \ [red label] Coll. C [handwritten] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus subsinuatus Pic [handwritten]”.
Type material of the junior synonym.
REUNION: male lectotype (MNHN) of Xylographus rufescensPic 1921, here designated, labeled: “Ile Bourbon n. sp. [handwritten] \ type [handwritten] \ rufescens Pic [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus rufescens Pic [handwritten]”.
Remarks.
We observed that the lectotype of Xylographus rufescens is a small teneral male of Xylographus subsinuatus. We dissected the types and compared the sclerites of abdominal terminalia, which are identical.
RUSSIA: male lectotype (MNHN), here designated, labeled: “Amur [handwritten] \ tomicoides m. 1902 [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus tomicoides Reitter [handwritten]”.
Excluded speciesD367BF71-6C66-530C-92B1-0E565D01F651Cisrenominatusnom. n.Xylographus dentatusPic 1922: 7. Secondary junior homonym of Cis dentatus Mellié, 1849. Type-locality: Republic of the Congo.Type series.
REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO: male lectotype (MNHN), here designated, labeled: “Franz. Congo [printed] \ dentatus n. sp. [handwritten] \ Cis sp. A. Kompantsev det. 2010 [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus dentatus Pic [handwritten] \ [green label] Cis renominatus Sandoval-Gómez, Lópes-Andrade & Lawrence nom. n.”; 6 male and 2 female paralectotypes (MNHN), labeled: “Franz. Congo [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus dentatus Pic [handwritten] \ [green label] Cis renominatus Sandoval-Gómez, Lópes-Andrade & Lawrence nom. n.”.
Remarks.
Xylographus dentatus Pic, 1922 is transferred to the genus Cis, but Cis dentatus (Pic, 1922) becomes a junior secondary homonym of Cis dentatus Mellié, 1849. The replacement name proposed here means “renamed”.
83CEDD13-8EEF-AB64-7617-42D809A598B9Paratrichapusfultonihttp://species-id.net/wiki/Paratrichapus_fultoni(Broun, 1886)comb. n.Cis fultoniBroun 1886: 904. Type-locality: West Taieri, New Zealand.Xylographus fultoni (Broun, 1886) Kuschel 1990: 62.Type series.
INDONESIA: male lectotype (MNHN), here designated, labeled: “F. C. DRESCHER G. Tangkoeban Prahoe 4000.5000 Voet. Preanger. Java 31.x.1934 [printed] \ ex Fomes melanopurus Mont. [printed] \ n. sp. diffère de Xylographus ceylonicus Ancey par la forme plus allongée, le thorax moins court, plus fortement rétréci en avant, les élytres sans pli huméral brillant [handwritten] \ [red label] LECTOTYPE Xylographus javanus Pic [printed] \ Paratrichapus javanus (Pic, 1937) comb. n. Sandoval-Gómez, Lopes-Andrade & Lawrence [handwritten]”; 1 male paralectotype (MNHN), labeled: “F. C. DRESCHER G. Tangkoeban Prahoe 4000.5000 Voet. Preanger. Java 31.x.1934 [printed] \ ex Fomes melanopurus Mont. [printed] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus javanus Pic [printed] \ Paratrichapus javanus (Pic, 1937) comb. n. Sandoval-Gómez, Lopes-Andrade & Lawrence [handwritten]”; 1female paralectotype (MNHN), labeled: “F. C. DRESCHER G. Tangkoeban Prahoe 4000.5000 Voet. Preanger. Java 22.i.1935 [printed] \ ex Fomes melanopurus Mont. [printed] \ Xylographus javanus n. sp. [handwritten] \ [yellow label] PARALECTOTYPE Xylographus javanus Pic [printed] \ Paratrichapus javanus (Pic, 1937) comb. n. Sandoval-Gómez, Lopes-Andrade & Lawrence [handwritten]”.
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to Stéphane Boucher who generously helped VES to search, separate, photograph and borrow a large amount of type material of Xylographus from the MNHN. This work could not have been possible without the help and assistance of several researchers and curators who kindly separated and sent us specimens, or allowed in loco the examination of material: Maxwell Barclay and Malcolm Kerley (NHM), Giulio Cuccodoro (MHNG), Thierry Deuve, Azadeh Taghavian and Antoine Mantilleri (MNHN), Manfred Uhlig, Bernd Jaeger and Joachim Willers (MFNB), Bert Viklund (NHRS) and Harald Schillhammer (NHMW). We thank Daniele R. Parizotto, Maria Augusta L. Siqueira, Paschoal C. Grossi and Tatianne G. Marques Silva for carefully revising and improving this paper. We also thank Ester H. Oliveira for reexamining and sending us images of the type of Paratrichapus sechellarum and slide preparations of its tarsi by Hugh Scott, deposited at the NHM; and Alexander V. Kompantsev, who reexamined and sent us images of Xylographus brasiliensis, Xylographus lemoulti, Xylographus ritsemai and Xylographus rufipes. Financial support was provided by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG: Universal APQ-00653-12; Programa Mineiro de Pós-Doutorado – PMPD postdoctoral grant to VES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq: PROTAX 52/2010 n° 562229/2010-8; Universal nº 479737/2012-6; research grant to CLA nº 302480/2012-9), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES: PEC-PG doctoral grant to VES), SISBIOTA (CNPq/FAPEMIG n° 5653360/2010-0), Museum of Comparative Zoology – Harvard University (MCZ: Ernst Mayr grant in animal systematics to VES) and the Graduate Program in Entomology of the Federal University of Viçosa (UFV).
ReferencesAnceyF (1876) Description d’un nouvelle espèce de Ciside., Paris, Vol. 2(160), Year 8: 85.Antunes-CarvalhoCLopes-AndradeC (2013) Two invaders instead of one: the true identity of species under the name Ceracis cucullatus (Coleoptera: Ciidae).8(8): e72319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072319BlairKG (1940) Some new species of Cisidae (Col.) from Australia.76: 131-136.BrounT (1886) Manual of the New Zealand Coleoptera. Part 4.New Zealand Museum and Geological Survey Department, Wellington, 817–974.DejeanPFMA (1835) Catalogue des coléoptères de la collection de M. le comte Dejean.Deuxième Édition [Livraison 4]. Méquignon-Marvis Père et Fils, Paris, 257–360.DufourL (1843) Excursion entomologiques dans les montagnes de la vallée d’Ossan.3: 1-118.FåhraeusOI (1871) Coleoptera Caffrariae, Annis 1838–45 a J. A. Wahlberg collecta. Fam. Scolytidae, Paussidae, Bostrichidae et Cioidae. Forhandlingar Kongl.Vetenskaps-Akademiens, Stockholm28(6): 661-672.FerrerJ (1997) Contribution à la connaissance des Ciidae. Désignation des Lectotypes des espèces descrites par Fahraeus (1871) et Reitter (1908) préservées aux Musées de Stockholm et de Wien.18(25): 405-416.GerstaeckerA (1871) Beitrag zur Insektenfauna von Zanzibar. III. Coleoptera.37(1): 42-86.GorhamHS (1886) Supplement to Malacodermata. In: GodmanFDSalvinO (Eds) Vol. 3, Part 2. Porter, London, 313-360.KawanabeM (1995) A synonymic note on Paraxestocis unicornis Miyatake (Coleoptera, Ciidae)., Tokyo23(2): 175-176.KuschelG (1990) Beetles in a suburban environment: a New Zealand case study. The identity and status of Coleoptera in the natural and modified habitats of Lynfield, Auckland (1974-1989).Auckland: New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, .LawrenceJF (1971) Revision of the North American Ciidae (Coleoptera).142: 419-522.LawrenceJFLopes-AndradeC (2010) Ciidae Leach in Samouelle, 1819 In: LeschenRABBeutelRGLawrenceJF (Eds) Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 504-514.Lopes-AndradeCZacaroAA (2003) Xylographus lucasi, a new Brazilian species of Ciidae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionoidea).10(2): 1-6.LucasH (1849) Exploration Scientifique de l’Algerie, Zoologie.2 Partie. Insectes.Imprimerie Nationale, Paris, 590 pp, 47 pls.MelliéJ (1847) 1847: 108-110.MelliéJ (1849) Monographie de l’ancien genre Cis des auteurs. (2) 6: 205–274, 313–396.MiyatakeM (1954) Studies on the Japanese Ciidae, I (Coleoptera).14: 39-67.MüllerCJaegerBKompantsevAVUhligM (2001) Type and species catalogue of the minute tree-fungus beetles of the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, with general information on the Coleoptera collection, its curation and “Historical Collection” (Coleoptera, Polyphaga, Ciidae and Pterogeniidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin.77(2): 303-323. doi: 10.1002/mmnz.20010770214NobuchiA (1955) Studies on the ciid-beetles from Japan. (I) With the descriptions of a new genus and some new species (Ciidae, Coleoptera).6(7): 53–58, pl. 12.NobuchiAWadaY (1956) A new species of Japanese Xylographus (Ciidae, Coleoptera).7(2): 35-36.OliveiraEHLopes-AndradeCLawrenceJF (2013) Review of the Neotropical Ciidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) in the Cis taurus species-group.71(3): 181-210.PicM (1916a) Diagnoses specifiques.17: 8-20.PicM (1916b) Diagnoses generiques et specifiques., Moulins18: 1-20.PicM (1921) Diagnoses de Coléoptères exotiques., Moulins37: 6–8, 10–12, 15–16.PicM (1922) Nouveautes diverses., Moulins36: 1-32.PicM (1929) Nouveaux Coléoptères Africains.1929: 263–264, 319–320.PicM (1930) Coléoptères nouveaux de la Republique Argentine.55: 175-179.PicM (1934) Nouveautes diverses., Moulins63: 1-36.PicM (1937) Deux nouveaux Coléoptères de Java., Amsterdam80: 304.ReitterE (1902) Analytische Uebersicht der palaearctischen Gattungen und Arten der Coleopteren-Familien: Byrrhidae (Anobiidae) und Cioidae.40: 1-64.ReitterE (1908) Verzeichnis der von Dr. F. Eichelbaum im Jahre 1903 in Deutsch-Ost-Afrika gesammelten Cis-Arten (Coleoptera).27: 119-124.ReitterE (1911) Paläarktische Coleopterennovitäten.30: 47-55.Sandoval-GómezVELopes-AndradeCZacaroAA (2011) Xylographus globipennis Reitter, 1911 (Coleoptera: Ciidae): a barely studied species with broad distribution in the Afrotropical region.14: 326-332. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8298.2011.00458.xScottH (1926) Coleoptera, Ciidae.Vol. 8, No. 1. , Ser. 2. Zoology19(1): 1-41.