2urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:45048D35-BB1D-5CE8-9668-537E44BD4C7Eurn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:91BD42D4-90F1-4B45-9350-EEF175B1727AZooKeysZK1313-29891313-2970Pensoft Publishers10.3897/zookeys.819.2545825458Review ArticleSiphonapteraBiodiversity & ConservationAmericasSiphonaptera of CanadaGallowayTerry D.terry.galloway@umanitoba.ca1Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, CanadaUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
Corresponding author: Terry D. Galloway (terry.galloway@umanitoba.ca)
Academic editor: D. Langor
201924012019819455462FFE0FFE7-8210-FFF2-FF9B-634EFFD0E96EBB6CFC67-D44F-45D7-924B-E317BA5778BF25546950304201829052018Terry D. GallowayThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.http://zoobank.org/BB6CFC67-D44F-45D7-924B-E317BA5778BF
There are currently 154 species of fleas recorded in Canada in four superfamilies and seven families. Only two species have been added to the list since the previous summary by Holland (1979) one of which is unlikely to be established in Canada. There have been a number of significant nomenclatural changes since then most notable of which is the split of the Hystrichopsyllidae into two families Hystrichopsyllidae and Ctenophthalmidae. An additional 23 species may eventually be recorded based on presence of suitable hosts and proximity to known distributions. Six species are introduced and one species is adventive. Although total diversity is reasonably well known there are numerous gaps in distribution of fleas throughout the country. Barcode Index Numbers are available for only 22 species of fleas collected in Canada.
biodiversity assessmentBiota of CanadafleasSiphonapteraFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Manitoba
Department of Entomology, University of ManitobaCitation
Galloway TD (2019) Siphonaptera of Canada In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 455–462. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.25458
Fleas are a relatively small group, with more than 2200 species known worldwide. Species in Canada range in size from <2 mm (the introduced sticktight flea, Echidnophagagallinacea (Westwood)) to >9 mm (Hystrichopsyllaschefferi Chapin, likely the largest flea in the world). Fleas have profound medical and veterinary significance, and are best known for their role as vectors for the bacterial agent of bubonic plague. Their consequent historic impact on humans and society has been immeasurable. Flea vectors and bubonic plague have been recorded in Canada, and although known to occur in humans, have not been of major concern in recent years. However, the fear of plague epidemics was the stimulus for some of the early work on fleas in western Canada. As a result, our knowledge of the flea fauna of Canada is very good, largely through the efforts of George P. Holland. He produced two monographs (Holland 1949, 1985), the most recent of which included nearly all species recorded for Canada, as well as those for Alaska and Greenland. Today, fleas are mostly regarded as a source of annoyance to humans and to their pets. For example, the introduced cat flea is widespread, and a primary target for pest control in the home.
The following account is for the 154 species known to occur in Canada (Table 1). There have been some nomenclatural changes since Holland (1979, 1985), but only two species, E.gallinacea and Myodopsyllaborealis Lewis, have been added to our fauna since that time (Chilton et al. 2000, Galloway et al. 2000). With these exceptions in mind, it is possible to identify the majority of taxa in Canada using Holland’s more recent monograph (Holland 1985). The number of species recorded in Canada represents about 51% of the 303 species found in North America (Lewis and Eckerlin, in press). By far the greatest diversity of species occurs in British Columbia, and more than two thirds of species in Canada are found only in the provinces west of Ontario. There are six species of fleas introduced into North America north of Mexico that have been recorded in Canada (Pulicidae, 3; Leptopsyllidae, 1; Ceratophyllidae, 2), mostly ectoparasites of synanthropic rodents, poultry, and pets. One species of Pulicidae, E.gallinacea, is adventive on migratory birds from the United States and unlikely to become established in Canada.
The higher classification of Lewis (1993a, 1998, 2000) is adopted here. Because of his recognition of the Ctenophthalmidae at the family level, including the Stenoponiinae, Neopsyllinae, Rhadinopsyllinae, Ctenophthalminae, Doratopsyllinae, and Anomiopsyllinae, compared to Holland’s Ctenophthalminae (as part of the Hystrichopsyllidae), the tables here and in Holland (1979) do not compare readily. As well, Holland (1979) cited all taxa, including subspecies, known for Canada as well as for Alaska and Greenland, further complicating comparison of numbers of taxa from 1979 to now. Taxonomic and nomenclatural changes introduced by Smit (1983) in his treatment of the Ceratophyllidae were published too late for Holland to consider and make changes to his 1985 monograph, though these changes were mostly at the generic level and have no effect on numbers of taxa in Holland (1985). There are recent monographs and regional lists of fleas in biogeographic areas outside Canada, where flea species not yet recorded for Canada occur. These include Traub et al. (1983), Lewis et al. (1988), Haas et al. (1989), Lewis (1990), Larson (1997), and Lewis (1998). The papers of RE Lewis (1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1993b, Lewis and Lewis 1985) on distribution and host preferences in fleas and on classification of the Siphonaptera are valuable references. As well, Lewis and colleagues published several recent reviews of genera of fleas in North America (Lewis 2000, 2002, 2003, 2008a, b, 2009, Lewis and Galloway 2001, Lewis and Haas 2001, Lewis and Jameson 2002, Lewis and Wilson 2006) wherein there are relevant nomenclatural changes from taxa cited by Holland (1985). In addition, volumes I-V of the Illustrated Catalogue of the Rothschild Collection of Fleas (Hopkins and Rothschild 1953–1971) are essential companions for anyone studying fleas in Canada.
The flea fauna of Canada is relatively well known; it is expected that at least another 23 species may be discovered, more than half of these in the family Ceratophyllidae. These estimates were generated by considering the fauna of adjacent jurisdictions (northern United States, including Alaska) that include species with ranges in close proximity and for which known hosts occur in Canada. I know of no undescribed species of fleas in Canada.
There are enormous gaps in the known ranges of various species across the country. For example, Tarsopsyllaoctodecimdentatuscoloradensis (Baker) is a nest flea of red squirrel, Tamiasciurushudsonicus (Erxleben), and Kueichenlipsyllaatrox (Jordan) is a winter-active flea that infests mustelids. Known records are few and widely scattered. They no doubt occur in many other parts of Canada, but apparent rarity and gaps in distribution are probably the result of insufficient targeted collecting effort. There is also scant information on the seasonal dynamics and life histories of fleas, though there are some recent studies on important aspects of ecology and flea/host interactions (e.g., Reichardt and Galloway 1994, Lindsay and Galloway 1997, 1998, Thomas and Shutler 2001, Perez-Orella and Schulte-Hostedde 2005, Shutler and Campbell 2007, Gorrell and Schulte-Hostedde 2008, Guderham and Schulte-Hostedde 2011, Waterman et al. 2014, Raveh et al. 2015). Larval taxonomy is in its infancy in Canada (but see Elbel 1991, Pilgrim and Galloway 2000, 2007, Galloway and Pilgrim 2001, Harriman et al. 2011). There are extensive or partial larval descriptions for only 16 of the taxa found in Canada, seven of which are for introduced and adventive species.
The Canadian fauna has been poorly characterised using DNA barcodes; there are only about 14% as many BINs as there are described species in Canada, most of which (18 of 22) are from Ceratophyllidae (Table 1). Recent and current studies are focussed on a small number of flea taxa, and there are few broad surveys being undertaken where additional taxa for DNA barcoding could be collected. This represents a significant gap in our knowledge of the fleas of Canada. There are certainly taxonomic problems that could benefit from careful research in which DNA barcoding is a component. For example, there are four species of Ceratophyllus that infest cliff swallows (Petrochelidonpyrrhonota Veillot) in Canada: Ceratophylluscelsuscelsus Jordan, C.scopulorum Holland, C.calderwoodi Holland, C.arcuegens Holland. Although their geographic distributions are largely allopatric, there are critical areas of overlap (Galloway 1988). DNA barcoding might be a valuable tool to examine species status among these taxa. It is important that people continue to collect adult fleas and larvae from identified hosts and their nests throughout the country to add to our understanding of this important group of ectoparasites.
Census of Siphonaptera in Canada.
Taxon1
Adjusted no. species reported in Holland (1979)2
No. species currently known from Canada3
No. BINs4available for Canadian species
Est. no. undescribed or unrecorded species in Canada
General distribution by ecozone5 and host range
Information sources
Superfamily Pulicoidea
Pulicidae
76
8 (3)
1
2
potentially all ecozones; wide variety of mammals and birds
Holland 1949, 1985, Galloway et al. 2000, 2002; WRME7
all ecozones south of taiga; insectivores, small rodents
Holland 1949, 1985; WRME
Ctenophthalmidae8
50
519
3
3
all except Arctic ecozones; insectivores, rodents
Holland 1949, 1985, Lewis and Haas 2001, Morrone and Acosta 2006; WRME
Superfamily Ceratophylloidea
Ischnopsyllidae
4
5
0
0
transcontinental exclusive of Arctic and alpine areas; specific to bats
Holland 1949, 1985, Chilton et al. 2000; WRME
Leptopsyllidae
14
14 (1)
0
3
all except Arctic; rodents, lagomorphs, birds
Holland 1949, 1985; WRME
Ceratophyllidae
67
67 (2)
18
13
all ecozones; mainly small mammals and birds
Holland 1949, 1985, Lewis 1990, 1993a, b, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2007, 2008a, b, 2009, Lewis and Galloway 2001, Lewis and Haas 2001, Lewis and Jameson 2002, Lewis and Wilson 2006, Lewis and Eckerlin 2013; WRME
Total
151
154 (6)
22
23
1Classification follows Lewis (2000). 2Holland (1979) included subspecies in the numbers he reported, many of which have since been suppressed. Holland also included species recorded in Alaska and Greenland, but not in Canada. Numbers of species in this column have been adjusted to include only species Holland (1985) recorded as occurring in Canada. 3Numbers in parentheses represent the numbers of introduced species included in the total for each family, exclusive of the non-native, E.gallinacea, which may disperse into Canada on birds from the USA. 4Barcode Index Number, as defined in Ratnasingham and Hebert (2013). 5See figure 1 in Langor (2019) for a map of ecozones. 6Holland (1979) reported eight species of Pulicidae, but it appears he included Actenopsyllasuavis Jordan & Rothschild in that total; he reported no specimens that had actually been collected in Canada or Alaska. Only those seven species for which there are Canadian records are included here. 7J.B. Wallis/R.E. Roughley Museum of Entomology, Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB. 8Holland (1979) treated this group of fleas as one family, Hystrichopsyllidae, though it is currently separated into two families, Hystrichopsyllidae and Ctenophthalmidae. Numbers of species in each family in 1979 are based on those reported by Holland (1985). 9Totals adjusted to accommodate nomenclatural changes to the genera, Catallagia (Lewis and Haas 2001) and Corrodopsylla (Morrone and Acosta 2006).
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Wayne Knee and Owen Lonsdale for access to the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes database for fleas, and to Jeremy deWaard for his assistance with the BINs for the table. I also thank the Department of Entomology and the Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences for their continued support for research on ectoparasites.
ReferencesChiltonGVonhofMJPetersonBVWilsonN (2000) Ectoparasitic insects of bats in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Parasitology 86: 191–192. https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0191:EIOBIB]2.0.CO;2ElbelRE (1991) Order Siphonaptera [including contributions from R.L.C. Pilgrim]. In: StehrFW (Ed.) Immature Insects 2., 674–689.GallowayTD (1988) Patterns of geographic distribution and dispersal among North American cliff swallow fleas (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Congress of Entomology, Vancouver, British Columbia, 49.GallowayTDAndruschakAUnderwoodRM (2000) Echidnophagagallinacea (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) recorded in Canada for the first time.56: 5–7.GallowayTDPilgrimRLC (2001) New records of Ceratophylluslari (Siphonaptera) and diagnosis of the larva. The Northeastern Naturalist 8: 491–494. https://doi.org/10.1656/1092-6194(2001)008[0491:NRFCLS]2.0.CO;2GorrellJCSchulte-HosteddeAI (2008) Patterns of parasitism and body size in red squirrels (Tamiasciurushudsonicus).86: 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z07-123GuderhamKSchulte-HosteddeA (2011) Macroparasitism influences reproductive success in red squirrels (Tamiasciurushudsonicus).22: 1195–1200. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr112HaasGEWilsonNOsborneTOZarnkeRLJohnsonLWolffJO (1989) Mammal fleas (Siphonaptera) of Alaska and Yukon Territory.67: 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1139/z89-059HarrimanVBGallowayTDAlisaukasRTWobeserGA (2011) A new record for Ceratophyllusvagabundusvagabundus (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae) in nests of Lesser Snow Goose and Ross’ Goose in Nunavut, Canada, with description of the larva.97: 218–220. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-2580.1HollandGP (1949) The Siphonaptera of Canada. Canada Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 70, 305 pp.HollandGP (1979) 43. Siphonaptera. In: DanksHV (Ed.) Canada and its insect fauna., 424–426. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm111108424-1HollandGP (1985) The fleas of Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Siphonaptera).130: 1–631. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm117130fvHopkinsGHERothschildM (1953–1971) An illustrated catalogue of the Rothschild collection of fleas (Siphonaptera) in the British Museum (Natural History). British Museum (Natural History), London, 1953 – I. Tungidae, Pulicidae, 361 pp [+45 pls]; 1956 – II. Coptopsyllidae, Vermipsyllidae, Stephanocercidae, Macropsyllidae, Ischnopsyllidae, Hypsophthalmidae, Xiphiopsyllidae, 445 pp [+32 pls]; 1962 – III. Hystrichopsyllidae, 560 pp [+10 pls]; 1966 – IV. Hystrichopsyllidae, 549 pp [+12 pls]; 1971 –V. Leptopsyllidae, Ancistropsyllidae, 530 pp [+3 pls].LangorDW (2019) The diversity of terrestrial arthropods in Canada. In: LangorDWSheffieldCS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods.819: 9–40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.31947LarsonOR (1997) North Dakota fleas. X. An atlas of the state’s siphonapterans. Institute for Ecological Studies, University of North Dakota. Research Report No. 47, 1–77.LewisRE (1972) Notes of the geographical distribution and host preferences in the order Siphonaptera Part 1. Pulicidae.9: 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/9.6.511LewisRE (1973) Notes of the geographical distribution and host preferences in the order Siphonaptera Part 2. Rhopalopsyllidae, Malacopsyllidae and Vermipsyllidae.10: 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/10.3.255LewisRE (1974) Notes of the geographical distribution and host preferences in the order Siphonaptera Part 3. Hystrichopsyllidae.11: 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/11.2.147LewisRE (1975) Notes of the geographical distribution and host preferences in the order Siphonaptera Part 6. Ceratophyllidae.11: 658–676. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/11.6.658LewisRE (1990) Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein, 267 pp.LewisRE (1993a) Notes of the geographical distribution and host preferences in the order Siphonaptera Part 8. New taxa described between 1984 and 1990, with a current classification of the order.30: 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/30.1.239LewisRE (1993b) A new species of Thrassis from Baja California, Mexico (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae: Oropsyllinae).101: 536–541.LewisRE (1998) Résumé of the Siphonaptera (Insecta) of the world.35: 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/35.4.377LewisRE (2000) A taxonomic review of the North American genus Orchopeas Jordan, 1933 (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae: Ceratophyllinae).25: 164–189.LewisRE (2002) A review of the North American species of Oropsylla Wagner and Ioff, 1926 (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae: Ceratophyllinae).27: 184–206.LewisRE (2003) A review of the North American flea genus Spicata I. Fox, 1940.105: 876–882.LewisRE (2007) The squirrel flea Tarsopsyllaoctodecimdentata (Kolenati, 1863): distribution and host preferences (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). Annals of the Carnegie Museum 76: 171–176. https://doi.org/10.2992/0097-4463(2007)76[171:TSFTOK]2.0.CO;2LewisRE (2008a) Malaraeus Jordan, 1933: a North American genus of fleas (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae).77: 289–299. https://doi.org/10.2992/0097-4463-77.2.289LewisRE (2008b) The North American fleas of the genus Amalaraeus Ioff, 1936 (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae).77: 313–317. https://doi.org/10.2992/0097-4463-77.2.313LewisRE (2009) The North American fleas of the genus Megabothris Jordan, 1933 (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae).77: 431–450. https://doi.org/10.2992/0097-4463-77.4.431LewisREEckerlinRP (2013) A review of the mustelid-infesting fleas in the family Ceratophyllidae (Insecta: Siphonaptera).81: 119–134. https://doi.org/10.2992/007.081.0201LewisREEckerlinRP (in press) The Siphonaptera of North America north of Mexico, including Greenland. Annals of the Carnegie Museum.LewisREGallowayTD (2001) A taxonomic review of Ceratophyllus Curtis, 1832 of North America (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae: Ceratophyllinae).26: 119–161.LewisREHaasGE (2001) A review of North American Catallagia Rothschild, 1915 with the description of a new species (Siphonaptera: Ctenophthalmidae: Neopsyllinae: Phalacropsyllini).26: 51–69.LewisREJamesonEW (2002) A review of the flea genus Eumolpianus Smit, 1983 with a discussion of its geographic distribution and host associations (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae: Ceratophyllinae).27: 235–249.LewisRELewisJH (1985) Notes of the geographical distribution and host preferences in the order Siphonaptera Part 7. New taxa described between 1972 and 1983, with a supraspecific classification of the order.22: 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/22.2.134LewisRELewisJHMaserC (1988) Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, 296 pp.LewisREWilsonN (2006) A review of the ceratophyllid subfamily Dactyllopsyllinae. Part 2. Dactylopsylla Jordan, 1929 and Foxella Wagner, 1929 (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). Annals of the Carnegie Museum 75: 203–229. https://doi.org/10.2992/0097-4463(2006)75[203:AROTCS]2.0.CO;2LindsayLRGallowayTD (1997) Seasonal activity and temporal separation of four species of fleas (Insects: Siphonaptera) infesting Richardson’s ground squirrels, Spermophilusrichardsonii (Rodentia: Sciuridae), in Manitoba, Canada.75: 1310–1322. https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-155LindsayLRGallowayTD (1998) Reproductive status of four species of fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera) on Spermophilusrichardsonii (Rodentia: Sciuridae) in Manitoba, Canada.35: 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/35.4.423MorroneJJAcostaR (2006) A synopsis of the fleas (Insects: Siphonaptera) parasitizing New World species of Soricidae (Mammalia: Insectivora).1354: 1–30.Perez-OrellaCSchulte-HosteddeAI (2005) Effects of sex and body size on ectoparasite loads in the northern flying squirrel (Glaucomyssabrinus).83: 1381–1385. https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-126PilgrimRLCGallowayTD (2000) Descriptions of flea larvae, Ceratophyllus spp. (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae), found in the nests of swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae) in North America.132: 15–37. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent13215-1PilgrimRLCGallowayTD (2007) Descriptions of flea larvae (Siphonaptera: Hystrichopsyllidae, Ctenophthalmidae, Leptopsyllidae) of the specific parasites of the mountain beaver, Aplodontiarufa (Rafinesque) (Rodentia: Aplodontidae), in North America.139: 489–509. https://doi.org/10.4039/n06-072RatnasinghamSHebertPDN (2013) A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE 8(7): e66213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066213RavehSNeuhausPDobsonFS (2015) Ectoparasites and fitness of female Columbian ground squirrels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B-Biological Sciences 370: 20140113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0113ReichardtTRGallowayTD (1994) The seasonal occurrence and reproductive status of Opisocrostisbruneri (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae), a flea on Franklin’s ground squirrel, Spermophilusfranklinii (Rodentia: Sciuridae) near Birds Hill Park, Manitoba.31: 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/31.1.105ShutlerDCampbellAA (2007) Experimental addition of greenery reduces flea loads in nests of a non-greenery using species, the tree swallow Tachycinetabicolor.38: 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04015.xSmitFGAM (1983) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 36 pp. [205 figs, 90 pls]ThomasKShutlerD (2001) Ectoparasites, nestling growth, parental feeding rates, and begging intensity of tree swallows.79: 346–353. https://doi.org/10.1139/z00-206TraubRRothschildMHaddowJF (1983) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 288 pp.WatermanJMMacklinGFEnrightC (2014) Sex-biased parasitism in Richardson’s ground squirrels (Urocitellusrichardsonii) depends on the parasite examined.92: 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2013-0151