﻿A revision of the genus Eurymesosa Breuning, 1938 (Cerambycidae, Lamiinae, Mesosini)

﻿Abstract A taxonomic revision and redescription of the genus Eurymesosa Breuning, 1938 are presented, including a key to species. Three of the five currently accepted species are considered valid: Eurymesosaventralis (Pascoe, 1865), Eurymesosaallapsa (Pascoe, 1866) and Eurymesosaziranzhiyi Yamasako & Lin, 2016. Three junior synonyms are proposed for E.ventralis: Eurymesosaalbostictica Breuning, 1962, syn. nov., Eurymesosaaffinis Breuning, 1970, syn. nov., and Eurymesosamultinigromaculata Breuning, 1974, syn. nov. Additionally, E.allapsa (Pascoe, 1866) is resurrected from synonyms of E.ventralis. Females of E.allapsa and E.ziranzhiyi Yamasako & Lin, 2016 are described for the first time.


Materials and methods
The specimens examined are deposited in following institutional and private collections: The methods of taking photographs (Figs 4A-D, 5A-D) followed Huang et al. (2020).The photographs were taken with a Canon EOS 5DSR camera equipped with a Canon AF 100 mm macro lens and connected to the software Helicon Remote (Ver.3.9.7 W); top and bottom focus of the specimens were chosen by adjusting the focus of the lens using Helicon Remote; the shoot was commenced to obtain images at different depths of focus; and finally, images were stacked into a single high resolution image with the software Helicon Focus (Ver.6.7.1).The copyrights of other photographs were added to legend of corresponding figures.All photographs and figures were produced using Photoshop CS5 software.

Taxonomy
Eurymesosa Breuning, 1938Eurymesosa Breuning, 1938: 366 (key) Redescription.Breuning (1938) described detailed characters in his original description of Eurymesosa, but we found it is necessary to improve the description of this genus after examining types of all species and additional material.Thus, we redescribe Eurymesosa based on the original description provided by Breuning.Body elongated oval and robust.Head with single narrow and medial shallow sulcus extending from base of frons to posterior of vertex.Eyes coarsely faceted.Antennae moderately thin, sparsely fringed with long dark brown pubescence beneath, antennae more than 1/2 length of body in males, about 1/4 longer than body in females, apical cicatrix of antennal scape opened, 3 rd antennomere significantly longer than scape and 4 th antennomere respectively.Pronotum transverse and slightly rounded laterally, with three irregular calluses (two located at sides of center and one near basal middle), with single anterior transverse groove (middle part nearly missing) and single posterior transverse groove; disc sparsely covered with short white setae.Prosternal process narrow and distinctly lower than procoxae; procoxal cavity closed posteriorly.Scutellum linguiform.Elytra elongated, distinctly wider than pronotum, expanded in middle, widely rounded at apex, with two large, oblique bumps behind middle of base; disc sparsely with coarse granules at base and punctation (punctation slightly coarse at about basal 2/3 of elytra and slightly fine at about apical 1/3 of elytra); each elytron sparsely covered with short white setae; with single sub-rounded or sub-oval dark brown haired spot on above bump, single irregular dark brown haired spot behind humeri and close to margin, single sub-rounded dark brown haired spot before middle, several dark brown haired spots behind middle (number and shape of maculae are different in different species), and with several patchy dark brown maculae near apex.Mesosternal process with single tubercle in center, midcoxal cavity open to epimeron externally.Femora strongly claviform, mid-tibiae without groove.
Differential diagnosis.Based on the descriptions of the genera Eurymesosa and Mesosa Latreille, 1829 provided by Breuning (1938), we found that Eurymesosa is similar to Mesosa in its elongated oval body, the antennae thin and fringed beneath, the apical cicatrix of antennal scape opened, the 3 rd antennomere significantly longer than scape, the elytra widely rounded at apex, the prosternal process lower than procoxae, and the mid-tibiae without a groove.However, Eurymesosa differs from Mesosa in having the eyes strongly reniform (upper lobe and lower lobe of eyes subdivided in Mesosa), the elytra with two large, oblique bumps behind the middle of the base (without two large, oblique bumps behind middle of base in Mesosa), the mesosternal process with a single tubercle in the middle (without tubercles in middle in Mesosa).
Type material examined.Holotype, ♂ (BMNH), Mesosa allapsa Typ Pasc (handwritten with black ink on a rectangular white label) / Mesosa allapsa Penang Pasc.(handwritten with black ink on a rectangular white label with a longitudinal black line at left side) / Penang (handwritten with black ink on an olive-green label) / Pascoe Coll.93-60.(printed with black ink on a rectangular white label) / Type (printed with black ink on a circular white label with circular red borders) / NHMUK 014596800 plus a QR (quick response) code (printed with black ink on a rectangular white label); examined from five photographs (Fig. 1A-E).
Description of female.Similar to male, but with the body length: 14.0-15.4mm (4 specimens).One of the specimens (Fig. 1F-I), body length: 15.4 mm, antennae 1.28 times as long as body, length (mm) of each antennomere: scape = 3.4, pedicel= 0.4, III = 3.8, IV= 2.7, V = 2.0, VI = 1.5, VII = 1.4,VIII = 1.2, IX = 1.2, X= 1.1, X I = 1.0; elytra 1.6 times as long as wide.Comments.After exposing the lateral lobes of the tegmen (Fig. 1C), it was possible to confirm that the holotype of M. allapsa is a male.Breuning (1938) treated M. allapsa as an infraspecific variation or morph of E. ventralis based on the character "The two dark brown postmedian disc spots on each elytron are joined by a single larger spot".After comparing the holotypes of the above two species (Figs 1A-D, 2A-D), we found that M. allapsa can be clearly distinguished from E. ventralis by the following characters: the pubescent bands on the vertex are brown with light pink border (pubescent bands on vertex are yellowish brown for E. ventralis), each elytron covered with patchy dark brown maculae in basal half, with a single large irregular black spot behind middle, with patchy dark brown maculae in middle and near apical 1/4 (each elytron covered with patchy yellowish-brown maculae in basal half, with several small irregular black spots behind middle, with patchy yellowish-brown maculae in middle and near apical 1/4 for E. ventralis), femora, apical 2/3 of tibiae and dorsum of two basal joints and last joint of tarsi covered with short light pink pubescence (femora, apical 2/3 of tibiae and dorsum of two basal joints and last joint of tarsi covered with short yellowish-brown pubescence for E. ventralis).We thus resurrect M. allapsa and decide to keep it in the genus Eurymesosa.
Distribution.Malaysia (Penang, Sabah), Indonesia (Kalimantan).uning, 1974 (printed with black ink on a rectangular white label) / MNHN, Paris EC23125 plus a QR (quick response) code (printed with black ink on a rectangular white label); examined from four photographs (Fig. 2M-P).

Eurymesosa ventralis
Comments.After comparing the holotypes of E. ventralis (Fig. 2A-D), E. albostictica (the holotype photograph is available at: http://bezbycids.com/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=31562&w=o), E. affinis (Fig. 2I-K) and E. multinigromaculata (Fig. 2M-O), we found they were identical except for gender and body color.Pascoe (1865) did not mention the body color of Ereis ventralis in the original description, while Breuning (1938) transferred E. ventralis to Eurymesosa and stated that its body color was dark brown; the body color of E. albostictica was dark brown in the original description (Breuning 1962).The body color of E. affinis and E. multinigromaculata are reddish brown, but Breuning (1974) described the body color of E. multinigromaculata as dark brown in the original description.Perhaps the body color of E. multinigromaculata had faded to reddish brown and similarly for E. affinis.
There is no information in the literature regarding the sex of the holotypes of E. ventralis, M. nigromaculata, E. affinis and E. multinigromaculata, but we could confirm that the holotype of E. ventralis is a male, and the holotypes of M. nigromaculata, E. affinis and E. multinigromaculata are females, based on the description of Eurymesosa provided by Breuning (1938) and referring to other species (antennae are about 1/4 longer than body in females).Breuning (1938) provided the following localities for E. ventralis (currently E. ventralis + E. allapsa): "Cambodge; Presqu' île de Malacca: Penang (PASCOE); Tonkin: Hoa-Binh (collection Pic); Java; Bornéo: Sandakan (Musée de Dresde)".We verified the localities of E. ventralis across Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam through the examined material (Fig. 2A-P).However, we could not confirm whether the Java locality mentioned by Breuning (1938) pertains to E. allapsa or E. ventralis; hence, we omitted the Java locality from the records of E. ventralis.
Comments.According to Mr Mao Ye (pers.comm.) an unknown rotten vine was broken apart by hand, exposing numerous ants, a live male adult (Fig. 4E-F) and a female pupa (Fig. 5E) of E. ziranzhiyi.The live adult was placed on surface litter and the pupa was placed on a dried leaf for photographs.The pupa eclosed after several days.
The two inward oblique and sub-oval pubescent pink spots on the vertex are not well-defined on some males (Figs 3A, 4A), the two sub-rounded pink spots on the sides of the center of the frons are not well-defined on some males (Fig. 3 in Yamasako and Lin 2016, fig.4D) and a female deposited in YZU.

Key to species of Eurymesosa
The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom CDJH Collection Daniel J. Heffern, Houston, Texas, United States CFV Collection Francesco Vitali, Luxembourg, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg CZJL Collection Zi-Jun Liu, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China IZCAS Insect collection of the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China LPSNU School of Biological Science and Technology, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui, Guizhou, China MNHN Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France YZU The Insect Collection, College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.A-I Eurymesosa allapsa A-E Mesosa allapsa, holotype A male, dorsal habitus B male, lateral habitus C male, ventral habitus D male, frontal view E labels (photographs A-E were taken by Guang-Lin Xie) F-I Eurymesosa allapsa, female F dorsal habitus G lateral habitus H ventral habitus I frontal view (photographs F-I were taken by Francesco Vitali).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. A-P Eurymesosa ventralis A-E Ereis ventralis, holotype A male, dorsal habitus B male, lateral habitus C male, ventral habitus D male, frontal view E labels (photographs A-E were taken by Guang-Lin Xie) F-H Mesosa nigromaculata, holotype F female, dorsal habitus G female, lateral habitus H labels (photographs F-H were taken by Xavier Gouverneur) I-L Eurymesosa affinis, holotype I female, dorsal habitus J female, lateral habitus K female, ventral habitus L labels M-P Eurymesosa multinigromaculata, holotype M female, dorsal habitus N female, lateral habitus O female, ventral habitus P labels (photographs I-P were taken by Christophe Rivier).

Figure 3 .
Figure3.A-F Eurymesosa ziranzhiyi A holotype male, dorsal habitus B holotype labels C paratype male, dorsal habitus D paratype labels E paratype male, dorsal habitus F paratype labels (all photographs were taken by Mei-Ying Lin).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. A-E Eurymesosa ziranzhiyi, female A dorsal habitus B lateral habitus C ventral habitus D frontal view (photographs A-D were taken by Xian Zhou) E living pupa (photograph E was taken by Mao Ye).

Mesosa nigromaculata Pic, 1932: holotype
Pic (handwritten with black ink on a rectangular white label) / TYPE (printed with black ink on a rectangular red label) / Museum Paris Coll.M.