﻿A new genus and species of oceanic planktonic Tisbidae (Crustacea, Copepoda, Harpacticoida) with enlarged modified eyes

﻿Abstract Both sexes of a new monotypic genus of Tisbidae (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) are described from the epi- or mesopelagic zone in the Kuroshio region, Japan. Gyoromeguttatumgen. et sp. nov. belongs to a monophyletic lineage of deepwater holoplanktonic genera defined by a suite of characters. Within this clade, Gyoromegen. nov. appears most closely related to Neotisbella Boxshall, 1979. The most distinguishable feature of G.guttatumgen. et sp. nov. is the presence of large, paired, frontal modified eyes, each consisting of a baculiform ocellus, a globular (Gicklhorn’s?) organ, and a semi-parabolic plate. The taxonomic position of Tisbespinulosa Bradford & Wells, 1983 is discussed and a key to the six meso- and bathypelagic tisbid species is provided. Confusion surrounding earlier literature reports of supernumerary elements on the caudal ramus in some harpacticoid taxa is clarified. Secondary modifications of ocellar components of the typical naupliar eye in the Harpacticoida are reviewed. It is suggested that the development of specialized eyes in G.guttatumgen. et sp. nov. may provide a means for detecting bioluminescent food particles in oligotrophic pelagic environments. The large, vaulted prosome indicates the species is an opportunistic macrophage that has adopted gorging as a feeding strategy.

Following Boxshall's (1979) proposal of the Cholidyinae, Avdeev (1982Avdeev ( , 1983Avdeev ( , 1986) ) subsequently described five new genera associated with deep water octopodans but created taxonomic confusion by placing three of them in the Cholidyinae (Cholidyella Avdeev, 1982;Brescianiana Avdeev, 1982;Tripartisoma Avdeev, 1983) and the remaining two in the Tisbinae (Yunona Avdeev, 1983;Octopinella Avdeev, 1986).This subfamilial assignment, effectively implying a dual colonization of cephalopod mollusks by two sister lineages, was uncritically adopted by most authors (Bresciani and Lützen 1994;Humes and Voight 1997;López-González et al. 2000;Wells 2007) while the more parsimonious alternative involving a single colonization event was favored by Huys (2016) who also considered Neoscutellidium (parasitic on fish) a member of the same monophyletic lineage.In this scenario, the Tisbinae, as currently defined, constitute a paraphyletic group at the exclusion of the Cholidyinae, implying that the current subfamilial division of the Tisbidae is meaningless and must be abandoned.With the addition of Avdeevia Bresciani & Lützen, 1994, Genesis López-González, Bresciani & Huys in López-González et al. 2000 and Amplipedicola Avdeev, 2010 (all of which parasitize cephalopod hosts) the current number of genera in the Tisbidae stands at 21.
Members of the family Tisbidae exhibit a variety of lifestyles ranging from free-living to obligatory parasitic.Although all species are exclusively marine, the family as a whole serves as a typical example illustrating the complex ecological radiation that characterizes the evolutionary history of harpacticoid copepods.Tisbids, in particular species of the genera Tisbe and Scutellidium, show a universal occurrence of parallelism in phytal habitats (Hicks 1980(Hicks , 1985)), either as associates of the sediments trapped by algae when the fronds and holdfasts are heavily loaded with silt-clay or detritus, or as genuine algae-dwelling forms (Hicks and Coull 1983).In most cases a critical experimental verification of their trophic dependence on the algae does not exist.Others, such as members of Tisbintra and Tisbella are commonly found in surface plankton samples or mangrove ecosystems (Willey 1930;Sewell 1940;Ummerkutty 1961;Volkmann 1979a;Gómez and Fuentes-Reines 2017;Fuentes-Reinés and Suárez Morales 2019) and coastal marine (Coull 1970;Coull and Herman 1970;Fleeger and Shirley 1990;Franz and Friedman 2002) and brackish water habitats (Gurney 1927;Wilson 1932;Yeatman 1963Yeatman , 1983;;Reid and Hribar 2006;Morales-Serna and Gómez 2008).An increasing volume of literature has demonstrated that members of Drescheriella are sympagic (seaice inhabiting) and are often associated with microalgae colonizing the cracks in the sea ice (e.g., Giesbrecht 1902;Dahms and Dieckmann 1987;Dahms et al. 1990;Dahms and Schminke 1992;Schnack-Schiel et al. 1998, 2001a, b, 2004, 2008;Swadling et al. 2000;Kiko et al. 2008;Loots et al. 2009;Kramer et al. 2011;Wallis et al. 2016;Makabe et al. 2022).
In the Tisbidae, twenty-five species have entered into symbiotic associations with metazoan hosts (mollusks, echinoderms, crustaceans and teleost fish), representing ten independent colonization events (Huys 2016).Three of those events involve mollusk hosts, including cephalopods, bivalves, and gastropods.Most members of the "Cholidyinae" utilize deep water octopuses as hosts and complete the entire copepodid phase inside the tissues of the cephalopod while the free-swimming phase is presumably reduced to the naupliar and adult stages (López-González et al. 2000).Two species of Tisbe have been reported from the mantle cavity of mussels (Mytilus spp.) in both North and South America (Humes 1954;Huys and Song 2004;Cremonte et al. 2015;Huys 2016), representing the only records of tisbids associated with bivalved mollusks.The only association between marine gastropods and harpacticoid copepods was reported by Branch (1974) who found large numbers of all developmental stages of Scutellidium patellarum Branch, 1974, in the pallial cavity of five species of Patella L. in South Africa.Huys (2016) documented four independent associations between tisbids and crustacean hosts.Sacodiscus ovalis (Wilson, 1944) lives as an ectosymbiont on the exoskeleton of the American lobster Homarus americanus H. Milne Edwards, 1837 in North America (Wilson 1944;Humes 1960).Tisbe elongata (A.Scott, 1896) spends most of its life cycle in the gill chamber of the European lobster Homarus gammarus (Linnaeus, 1758) in British waters (Gooding 1957;Bruce et al. 1963;Holmes and O'Connor 1990;Gotto 1993;Gurney 1933).An undescribed species of Tisbe was recorded from the gills of the red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815), in the Barents Sea (Haugen et al. 1998;Jansen et al. 1998;Dvoretsky andDvoretsky 2013, 2023).The three known species of Paraidya are exclusively associated with Indo-Pacific diogenid anomuran crabs of the genus Dardanus Paul'son, 1875 (Humes and Ho 1969;Humes 1981;Innocenti 2009).Two tisbid species are known to live in associations with echinoderm hosts (Huys 2016).Tisbe japonica Ho, 1982 is an associate of the blue bat star Patiria pectinifera (Müller & Troschel, 1842) in the Sea of Japan and the only harpacticoid known to utilize starfish hosts (Ho 1982).Stock (1960) recovered Sacodiscus humesi Stock, 1960 from washings of Holothuria (Holothuria) tubulosa Gmelin, 1791 collected in the Bay of Banyuls, France but this association requires confirmation (Huys 2016).Finally, Neoscutellidium yeatmani Zwerner, 1967 occurs on the gills of the bathydemersal Antarctic eelpout, Lycodichthys dearborni (DeWitt, 1962), and is the only confirmed record of a harpacticoid utilizing a fish host (Zwerner 1967).
Only few harpacticoid families have secondarily colonized open oceanic waters (Boxshall 1979;Huys and Böttger-Schnack 1994;Huys and Conroy-Dalton 2000) and their evolutionary success in terms of diversification in the oceanic realm has generally remained limited.The Tisbidae contains a monophyletic clade uniting three genera (Bathyidia, Neotisbella, Volkmannia) that are exclusively found in the meso-and bathypelagic zones of the Atlantic Ocean (Farran 1926;Deevey and Brooks 1977;Boxshall 1979;Khodami et al. 2017).Here we describe a new genus and species of oceanic planktonic Tisbidae from the epior mesopelagic zone of the Kuroshio region, Japan, compare its unique morphological features and discuss its relationships with other deepwater genera in the family.
P1-P4 with 3-segmented exopods and endopods; with dense pattern of minute spinules on anterior surface of protopod and rami.P1 outer spines on exp-2 and -3 without spinular combs; exp-2 not markedly longer than other exopodal segments.P1 endopod non-prehensile; indistinctly 3-segmented with transverse surface suture marking original segmentation between enp-2 and -3; enp-1 expanded in distal half forming lobate extension along medial margin; enp-3 small.P2 enp-1 inner seta modified in ♂, displaying pinnate ornamentation along distal half of outer margin (instead of plumose in ♀).Armature formula of P1-P4 as follows (Roman and Arabic numerals indicate spines and setae, respectively): P5 2-segmented in both sexes, comprising baseoendopod and elongate exopod; obsolete endopodal lobe represented by one seta (minute in ♂); exopod with one outer, one inner and two terminal well developed setae.P6 with two minute setae in ♀; sixth pair of legs symmetrical in ♂, each with three well developed setae.
Etymology.The generic name is based on the Japanese word "Gyorome", meaning "bulging eyes" and refers to the large ocelli in the cephalosome of the type species.Gender neuter.
Description of adult female.Total body length ranging from 1.64-1.80mm (n = 3).Habitus (Figs 1, 2A, B) cyclopiform and yellowish.Prosome (Fig. 2A, B) significantly expanded bilaterally, ovoid in dorsal aspect producing vaulted appearance; integument of cephalothorax (except anterior portion) and somites bearing legs 2-4 with dense pattern of minute surface denticles (Fig. 2A).Cephalosome completely fused to first pedigerous somite, forming cephalothorax; ventral surface between maxilliped and leg 1 with distinct protuberance; posterodorsal margin with semicircular lobate extension covering anterior third of leg 2-bearing somite.Anterior part of cephalosome with middorsal pair of baculiform ocelli (BO in Fig. 2A, B) and one pair of globular organs (GO in Fig. 2A, B) each surrounded by thin semi-parabolic plate (SP in Fig. 2A, B) either side of baculiform ocelli; lipid droplets (LD in Fig. 2B) filling up space between and posterior to semi-parabolic plates; ovaries (OV in Fig. 2B) occupying larger part of posterior half of cephalothorax.Rostrum (Fig. 2C) small and triangular, pointing downwards; labrum (LB in Fig. 2D) a rounded lobe with spinules around distal margin; paragnaths (PG in Fig. 2D) represented by semicircular lobes fringed with setulae posteriorly and laterally.
Urosome (Fig. 3A, B) cylindrical, comprising fifth pedigerous somite, genital double-somite, and three free abdominal somites; all somites with dense pattern of minute surface denticles (Fig. 2A).Leg 5-bearing somite with lateral setular tufts in anterior half.Original segmentation of genital double-somite marked by transverse suture and accompanying spinules dorsally and dorsolaterally; posterior margin with spinules all around; copulatory pore small, located midventrally, immediately posterior to genital slit; copulatory duct well developed, with slight bilateral constriction halfway down its length.Genital double-somite and free abdominal somites with numerous minute tubercles laterally; fourth and fifth urosomites with continuous row of spinules around posterior margin; anal somite with setulae posteromedially and with paired rows of spinules near bases of caudal rami.
Caudal ramus (Fig. 3C, D) ~ 3.3× as long as wide (measured in dorsal aspect); with seven setae, setae I-III and VII slender and naked, setae IV-V broken, represented in all specimens by short basal parts, setae VI slender and pinnate; seta I longer than caudal ramus, originating laterally in proximal third of ramus; seta II arising from outer distal corner; bases of setae IV and V positioned slightly ventral to that of seta VI; seta VI long (Fig. 3A, B), ~ 2.5× length of ramus length; seta VII located dorsally near inner margin at ~ 70% of ramus Antenna (Fig. 4B, B') without ornamentation on coxa.Basis unarmed, with setules on posterior surface.Endopod 2-segmented; proximal segment unarmed, with setules along abexopodal margin; distal segment with one minute and two well developed elements laterally and six setae apically, inner margin with short spinules proximally and outer margin with longer spinules in proximal half.Exopod 4-segmented; segments 1-3 with one lateral seta; segment 4 with three apical setae and spinules along inner and outer margins.
Mandible (Fig. 4C).Gnathobase with three well developed bicuspid teeth, three smaller teeth with terminal setular tuft, one hirsute dorsal seta, and transverse row of fine, densely arranged setules.Basis unarmed.Endopod unsegmented, with two proximal setae along inner margin and four distal setae; outer margin with row of setules.Exopod unsegmented, with one inner and two distal setae.Maxillule (Fig. 4D) 3-segmented, comprising praecoxa, endopod, and compound segment representing fused coxa, basis and exopod.Praecoxal arthrite with two naked setae on anterior surface; medial margin with one plumose seta; distal margin with two naked and three pinnate spines (fused at base to arthrite).Compound segment with few spinules along inner margin; coxa represented by subcylindrical endite with two setae; basal endites with three setae; exopod completely incorporated in segment, represented by single seta.Endopod distinct, with two setae.
Maxilla (Fig. 4E) 2-segmented, comprising syncoxa and allobasis.Syncoxa with setules along outer margin; medial margin with proximal protuberance bearing spinular row; coxal endite represented by small process with one plumose apical seta.Allobasis produced into curved claw with fine pinnules along outer margin and short plumose seta just over halfway claw length.
Maxilliped (Fig. 4F) 3-segmented, comprising syncoxa, basis and endopod.Syncoxa small, articulating with subcylindrical pedestal bearing long spinules at outer distal corner; with few spinules along medial margin.Basis elongate, ~ 3.5× as long as maximum width; unarmed; medial margin slightly expanded, with sparse long spinules in middle third and shorter spinules further distally; outer margin with two groups of long spinules as figured.Endopod small, subrectangular; outer margin with one unipinnate seta; distal margin with long, slender claw accompanied at base by plumose seta; claw with two closely set spinules halfway the inner margin.
Leg 5 (Fig. 5I) 2-segmented, comprising baseoendopod and 1-segmented exopod.Baseoendopod apparently fused basally to somite; endopodal lobe obsolete, armature represented by one very long seta (twice length of exopod); outer basal seta very long and naked.Exopod elongate, gradually widening towards distal margin; ~ 2.8× as long as maximum width; with setules along outer margin; armature consisting of one inner, one outer and two terminal setae (all elements sparsely bipinnate); small apical tubercle discernible between outer and outer terminal setae.
Sixth pair of legs (P6 in Fig. 3B) fused medially, forming common plate closing off genital slit; each leg represented by one long outer and one short inner setae.Egg-sac not observed.
Prosome resembling that of female except for denticles covering dorsal surface of cephalothorax and pedigerous somites much denser and middorsal protrusion around posterior margin of cephalothorax not expressed (Fig. 6A, B).Urosome (Fig. 6C, D) 6-segmented; denticles covering surface sparser than on prosome; spermatophore located in left half of genital somite; caudal ramus similar to that of female.
Antennule (Fig. 7A, A  Legs 1-4 similar to female condition except for inner basal spine of leg 1 without setulae or spinules (Fig. 7C) and inner seta of proximal endopodal segment of leg 2 (Fig. 7D) displaying pinnate ornamentation along distal half of outer margin (instead of plumose in female).
Sixth pair of legs (P6 in Fig. 6D) symmetrical, each represented by ovoid plate closing off genital aperture and bearing three naked, well developed setae.
Etymology.The specific name is derived from the Latin guttatum meaning spotted or speckled and alludes to the dense denticular ornamentation on the male prosome (Fig. 6A, B).

Key to planktonic Tisbidae
With the addition of Gyorome, four genera in the Tisbidae are now known to inhabit the meso-and bathypelagic oceanic zones.Three of these genera are monotypic while two species were assigned to Volkmannia (Boxshall 1979).Bradford and Wells (1983) described both sexes of Tisbe spinulosa Bradford & Wells, 1983 from a bait trap collected at nearly 600 m below sea level beneath the Ross Ice Shelf in Antarctica.They stated that it belongs among those species of Tisbe that display a P1 setation different from the normal type as defined by Volkmann (1979b).Based on aspects of the female antennule, mandible, P1 armature, P5 and genital field the species was regarded as intermediate between T. finmarchica (Sars, 1905) and the T. gracilis-group.In addition, Bradford and Wells (1983) considered two male characters, the maxilliped and the inner seta of P2 enp-1, that suggested a possible link with the latter group, admitting however that the resemblance in these sexually dimorphic features is not exact.The maxilliped in males of the T. gracilis-group displays (a) a lobate spinular expansion along the distal palmar margin of the basis, (b) a terminal endopodal claw which is much shorter than in the female, often slightly sinusoid, and bears a characteristic protuberance ("knee" sensu Volkmann 1979b) along the inner margin, and (c) usually an unguiform projection on the inner margin of the free endopodal segment (this can be absent in some species, e.g., T. dahmsi Ivanenko, Ferrari, Defaye, Sarradin & Sarrazin, 2011).The lobate basal expansion and the unguiform endopodal projection are both expressed in the male maxilliped of T. spinulosa, however, the endopodal claw is not sexually dimorphic and lacks the proximal protuberance.In all male members of the T. gracilis-group the inner seta of the proximal endopodal segment of P2 is transformed into a robust spine, typically displaying a species-specific shape and ornamentation.In T. spinulosa this seta is not spiniform but differs from the female condition in its shorter length and more elaborate ornamentation along the proximal outer margin.Although Bradford and Wells (1983) considered including T. spinulosa in the gracilis-group, they refrained from this course of action due to two characters preventing such an assignment, i.e., the armature pattern on the distal exopodal segment of P1 (3 setae + 3 spines), and the pustulate ornamentation of the body surface.The latter character was viewed as potential supporting evidence for the exclusion of T. spinulosa from the genus.Both Gómez et al. (2004) and Ivanenko et al. (2011) cursorily mentioned the species but no new insights emerged from their discussions.Finally, based on the sexual dimorphism of the maxilliped, morphology of P1 and spinular ornamentation of the body, Huys (2021) concluded that T. spinulosa must be assigned to Volkmannia and formally transferred it to this genus as V. spinulosa (Bradford & Wells, 1983).Additional morphological characters in support of its removal from the genus Tisbe include the unarmed mandibular basis, the absence of spinular combs on the exopodal spines of P1, the lateral displacement of caudal ramus setae IV-V, and the length:width ratio (> 2.0) of the caudal rami.Volkmannia spinulosa is most closely related to V. forficula Boxshall, 1979 and can be differentiated by small differences in the caudal rami and P5 of both sexes.The six species of the Bathyidia-lineage can be differentiated by the key below:  1).Members of this Bathyidia-lineage are generally large (in excess of 1 mm) and characterized by the following suite of characters: (a) prosome (cephalothorax and pedigerous somites) with pustulate integument (ornamentation consisting of dense pattern of small tubercles and denticles); (b) female antennule short and compact compared to other free-living tisbid genera, 8-segmented; (c) antenna without seta on proximal endopodal segment; (d) mandibular basis without armature; (e) distal palmar margin of male maxilliped produced into lobate spinular expansion and endopod with unguiform projection; (f) P1-P4 with dense pattern of minute spinules on anterior surface of protopod and rami; (g) P1 spines on middle and distal exopodal segments without spinular combs; (h) inner seta of proximal endopodal segment of P2 modified in male, displaying pinnate ornamentation along distal half of outer margin (instead of plumose in female); and (i) caudal ramus with paired multibranched tube-pores along posterior margin, displacing setae IV-V towards inner distal corner.At least (a), (c)-(f), (h) and (i) can be considered as shared derived characteristics supporting the monophyly of the four deep water genera.Character states (b) and (g) will require further assessment across the entire family before their potential status as synapomorphies can be ascertained.Within this clade, Volkmannia displays the most primitive armature on the female leg 5 with three setae remaining on the endopod while in the other genera the endopodal armature is reduced to a single seta.Similarly, the male P5 in V. spinulosa (but not in V. forficula, unknown in V. attenuata) exhibits two endopodal setae vs only one seta in the remaining genera.Members of Volkmannia also (a) have the most primitive armature pattern on the mandibular endopod, displaying three lateral and six terminal setae (vs at most two lateral and five apical setae in the other genera), (b) display elongation of the middle segment of the P1 exopod (vs all exopodal segments subequal), (c) possess a prehensile P1 endopod with distinctly elongate enp-1 and -2, and a minute apical segment (enp-3) bearing one outer spine and two terminal setae (vs non-prehensile without distinct elongation of segments and three setae on terminal segment), and (d) show three well developed setae on the female sixth legs.Bathyidia, Neotisbella, and Gyorome collectively form the sister group of Volkmannia and, in addition to the setal reductions in the mandibular endopod and P5 baseoendopod mentioned above, share the characteristic shape of the proximal segment of P1 endopod.Unlike in other tisbid genera this segment has undergone allometric growth medially, forming a distinct lobate expansion in its distal half from where the inner seta originates.
Gyorome appears most closely related to Neotisbella based on the unarmed antennary basis (loss of abexopodal seta), further reduction in mandibular armature (endopod with only four terminal setae instead of 5-6), and the virtually identical morphology of the P1 endopod (indistinctly 3-segmented in Gyorome, with original segmentation marked by transverse surface suture between enp-2 and -3; genuinely 2-segmented in Neotisbella).Both genera also share, to a certain degree, a bilaterally and dorsoventrally expanded prosome, giving it a vaulted appearance.Neotisbella differs from Gyorome in the reduced armature of the antennary exopod (1-0-1-3 vs the ancestral pattern 2-1-1-3 retained Gyorome), the presence of only one lateral seta (vs two) on the mandibular endopod, the sexual dimorphism expressed in the inner basal spine of leg 1 (transformed into a seta in the male), and short caudal ramus setae IV and V.The new genus can readily be differentiated from Neotisbella by the presence of paired, frontal, modified eyes, and the reduction in the number of armature elements on the P5 exopod in both sexes.Huys (1988) proposed a standard terminology for the seven caudal setae displayed by the generalized paramesochrid caudal ramus and stated that it is universally applicable to all harpacticoid families.The system was subsequently adopted by Huys and Boxshall (1991) who extended its application to all copepod orders and posited that the hypothetical copepod ancestor exhibited no more than seven setae on the caudal ramus.It had previously been pointed out that the report by Lang (1948) of eight setae in Canuella Scott & Scott, 1893 and Sunaristes Hesse, 1867 (Canuellidae now removed from the Harpacticoida) was based on observational errors (Huys 1988).Similarly, Boxshall (1979) reported up to nine elements on the caudal rami of three meso/bathypelagic genera (Bathyidia, Neotisbella, Volkmannia) in the family Tisbidae.The supernumerary elements in these genera originate from the posterior margin of the caudal ramus between setae III and IV and are typically thin-walled and flaccid.Huys and Boxshall (1991: fig. 3.12.1B,C) re-examined Bathyidia remota Farran, 1926 and revealed that the additional "setae" were extremely elongate and complex multi-branching tube-pores rather than articulating armature elements (Fig. 8: IT, OT).Examination of the types of Neotisbella gigas Boxshall, 1979(NHMUK reg. nos 1977.266-232),Volkmannia forficula (NHMUK reg. nos 1977.233-241), and V. attenuata Boxshall, 1979(NHMUK reg. no. 1977.324)confirmed the presence of similar caudal ramus tube-pores while inspection of material of other tisbid genera failed to reveal such structures.The discovery of these pores in Gyorome (Fig. 3A, C, D: IT, OT) points to a common ancestry of the deepwater planktonic genera in the Tisbidae.The function of these tube- pores is as yet unknown but their complex morphology, in conjunction with the significant displacement of setae IV and V towards the inner distal corner of the ramus, is here regarded as a synapomorphy supporting the monophyly of the four pelagic genera in the family.The only exception in this lineage is Volkmannia spinulosa (Bradford & Wells, 1983) which apparently lacks such tubepores, however, the distinct gap between seta III and the laterally displaced setae IV and V suggests that these transparent structures were overlooked in the original description (Bradford and Wells 1983: fig. 7d, h, i).

Modified naupliar eyes in Harpacticoida
Adult copepods typically have tripartite naupliar eyes consisting of three fused ocellar units (paired dorsolateral ocelli and one unpaired ventral ocellus).Each unit is made up of a retinal photoreceptor sphere, a tapetal layer and a surrounding pigment cup.However, the evolution of different designs from this simple eye generated more novelty and diversity in form than that of the more complex compound eye types found across the rest of the Crustacea (Steck et al. 2023).In several lineages secondary modifications of the ocellar components of the typical naupliar eye have evolved, ranging from complete loss to extreme enlargement, separation of the cups into three independent eyes, and the addition of structures used to focus light onto the retina such as crystalline or cuticular lenses.Extreme eye modification has been histologically documented in at least four orders, including the Calanoida (e.g., Pontellidae, Cephalophanes), Cyclopoida (e.g., Corycaeidae, Sapphirinidae), Siphonostomatoida (Caligidae) and Harpacticoida (e.g., Elofsson 1966;Huys and Böttger-Schnack 1994;Land 1984Land , 1988;;Nishida et al. 2002;Vaissière 1961).While most species in the latter order are thought to have typical naupliar eyes or have secondarily lost them, there are a few notable exceptions.Within the Harpacticoida elaborate eyes are only found in members of the planktonic subfamily Miraciinae (Miraciidae) with three of its four monotypic genera (Miracia Dana, 1846;Oculosetella Dahl, 1895;Distioculus Huys & Böttger-Schnack, 1994) displaying eyes of the telescopic type with double lenses oriented in the same light path with one distal to the other.The paired ocelli of the large anteriorly directed naupliar eyes each have an exterior lens of unknown origin, with both lenses being linearly arranged along the frontal margin of the cephalic shield, as well as a second lens directly in front of the retina (Claus 1891;Elofsson 1966;Huys and Böttger-Schnack 1994).Unlike the Corycaeidae and Sapphirinidae which also exhibit telescopic eyes, the dorsolateral ocelli have not undergone lateral displacement in the three miraciinid genera and the basic tripartite structure of the naupliar eye is retained.Phylogenetic analysis suggests that the frontal lenses were secondarily lost in the fourth genus, Macrostella A. Scott, 1909, possibly because of its intimate association with filamentous cyanobacteria (Huys and Böttger-Schnack 1994).
Some members of the genus Paradactylopodia Lang, 1944 (Dactylopusiidae) display lens-like structures on the frontal part of the cephalothorax.In P. spinipes (Brady, 1910) and P. oculata (Gurney, 1927) paired subintegumental lenses are positioned near the bases of the antennules (Brady 1910;Gurney 1927) and discernible in both dorsal and lateral aspects.In P. trioculata Hicks, 1988a the frontal portion of the cephalothorax displays lens-like structures set in a triangle with the anteriormost located at the base of the rostrum (note that it is conceivable that the latter was overlooked in P. spinipes and P. oculata).According to Hicks (1988a) the structures in P. trioculata are not merely sacs containing deposits of oil but genuine corneal lenses with high refractive properties.Two species in the speciose family Laophontidae, Heterolaophonte oculata (Gurney, 1927) and Laophonte pseudoculata Krishnaswamy, 1959, also display paired refringent lens-like structures, but nothing is known about their visual function.Interestingly, both P. trioculata and L. pseudoculata were collected from wood infested with shipworms, the former from a waterlogged teredinid bored log at 51 m depth, the latter from floating logs.
The photoreceptors displayed in Gyorome guttatum are of a level of complexity not previously observed in the Tisbidae.The majority of free-living tisbids display simple tripartite naupliar eyes such as in members of the genera Drescheriella (Dahms and Bergmans 1988), Paraidya (Humes and Ho 1969), Sacodiscus (Sars 1904(Sars , 1905)), Scutellidium (Branch 1974;Itô 1976), Tisbe (Bergmans 1979;Bocquet 1951;Vaissière 1961;Volkmann 1979b;Chullasorn et al. 2009), Tisbella (Volkmann 1979a), and Tisbintra (Ummerkutty 1961).No photoreceptors have been reported in the deepwater genera Bathyidia, Neotisbella, and Volkmannia (Boxshall 1979), however, it remains unclear whether this absence is genuine, or the coloration had already disappeared in the preserved material.The paired enlarged modified eyes in G. guttatum essentially each consist of three major components, i.e., (a) a baculiform ocellus (Fig. 2A, B: BO), (b) a semi-parabolic plate (Fig. 2A, B: SP) and (c) a globular organ (Fig. 2A, B: GO).The position and close connection between the large rod-shaped ocelli (Fig. 2A, B: BO) suggest that they are homologous with the paired dorsolateral ocelli expressed in the basic tripartite naupliar eye of most copepods.The unpaired ventral ocellus was not observed in the present study and is probably very reduced or absent.
The semi-parabolic plates bear a superficial resemblance to the semi-parabolic reflective mirrors that replace the tapetal and pigment cells in the paired eyes in members of the calanoid genus Cephalophanes Sars, 1907(Phaennidae) (Nishida et al. 2002) and ostracods belonging to the genus Gigantocypris Müller, 1895 (Cypridinidae) (Land 1978(Land , 1984;;Nilson 1997).However, the reflectors in these taxa are distinctly colored and have a multilayer structure made up of stacks of thin platelets of putative chitinous material while in G. guttatum the semi-parabolic plates are thin and colorless, casting doubt on their reflective potential.Based on muscle anatomy, Nishida et al. (2002) suggested that Cephalophanes species can control reflector direction, making their eyes one of the most effective broadband light detectors in the invertebrates; no such musculature was observed in association with the semi-parabolic plates of G. guttatum.It is postulated here that these plates merely serve as partitions, separating the spaces occupied by the ocelli and globular organs from the lipid droplets (LD in Fig. 2B), ovary (OV in Fig. 2B) and other organs.This space delimitation and compartmentalization, in conjunction with the apparent absence of dense surface ornamentation in the anterior portion of the cephalothorax, conceivably reduces or minimizes potential interference with the amount of incident light reaching the retinal cells in the ocellar region.With only two receptor cells in each reflector focal area, it is unlikely that the eyes of Cephalophanes refulgens Sars, 1907 have any image-resolving power; however, the presence of parabolic mirrors that direct light back to the retinal cells from all frontal angles optimizes their light-gathering efficiency in deep-sea habitats.It has been suggested that these large eyes are likely to aid in foraging in low light conditions and gut contents analysis of Cephalophanes spp.revealed that these detritivores feed primarily on the shower of carcasses ("Leichenregen") falling from the upper layers of the water column (Nishida et al. 2002;Steuer 1928).The visual detection of these carcasses is potentially facilitated by luminous bacteria that are commonly found associated with them and as such act as biomarkers of detrital food (Ohtsuka et al. 2019).It is unlikely that the presence of enlarged ocelli in G. guttatum, which coincidentally occurs in the same habitat as Cephalophanes spp., is related to either mate recognition or predator avoidance.Although no information exists on its overall photosensitivity and light-mediated behaviors, we speculate that food detection in G. guttatum is also directly mediated by vision.The development of specialized eyes in this species can be interpreted as the product of convergent evolution that, as in Cephalophanes, may provide a means for detecting bioluminescent food particles in oligotrophic mesopelagic environments.
The paired globular organs in G. guttatum (Fig. 2A, B: GO) are reminiscent of the paired "accessory photoreceptors" observed in some species of Calanus Leach, 1816 (Frost 1974).These receptors, collectively called Gicklhorn's organ, are supplied by a pair of nerves arising laterally from the central nervous system, independent of the optic nerves.Although their innervation was not investigated, the location of the globular organs in G. guttatum suggests that they are homologous with the paired Gicklhorn's organ documented in various calanoids, cyclopoids and harpacticoids (Dudley 1972;Elofsson 1966Elofsson , 1970Elofsson , 1971;;Frost 1974;Gicklhorn 1930).The organ has variously been interpreted as a non-visual light-sensing structure, an internal chemosensor or a structure involved in controlling the release of neurosecretory products (Elofsson 1966(Elofsson , 1970(Elofsson , 1971) ) while recent studies using antibody neural tracing suggested that the paired receptors of the Gicklhorn's organ may be homologous to the arthropod compound eye (Frase and Richter 2020).Pending the arrival of convincing behavioral or physiological evidence, the function and evolutionary origin of this organ remain enigmatic as ever (Steck et al. 2023).

Colonization of the open pelagic
Within the Tisbidae only members of the four genera of the Bathyidia-lineage are strictly holoplanktonic and oceanic.They inhabit the mesopelagic and bathypelagic zones but are only rarely encountered in plankton samples.Bathyidia remota is typically bathypelagic and has only been found on three occasions in the North Atlantic Ocean since its original description nearly one century ago.Farran (1926) discovered the female holotype in the Bay of Biscay in a plankton haul taken between 1,370 and 1,830 m depth.Deevey and Brooks (1977) subsequently recorded the male at 1,000-1,500 m in the Sargasso Sea while Boxshall (1979) reported both sexes off the Cape Verde Islands at 1,000-1,250 m depth.The species is further only known from a single outlier in the Arabian Sea where Böttger-Schnack (1996) recorded it at 1,050-1,850 m together with a second, as yet undescribed, species of Bathyidia.Neotisbella gigas has not been recorded again since its original description from mesopelagic depths (300-900 m) in the northeastern Atlantic (Boxshall 1979).The exact depth at which Gyorome guttatum was collected is unknown (0-935 m) but it appears that it assumes a mesopelagic depth distribution.Members of the genus Volkmannia are found at both mesopelagic and bathypelagic depths.The type species, V. forficula, is known from a single plankton haul taken between 410 and 890 m depth off the Cape Verde Islands (Boxshall 1979).Volkmannia attenuata is a typical bathypelagic species with records from the northeastern Atlantic (3,760-3,920 m) (Boxshall 1979) and the Clarion-Clipperton Zone in the Eastern Pacific (4,123 m) (Khodami et al. 2017).Finally, V. spinulosa was obtained from a bait bottle containing seal and fish meat which had been deployed near the sea floor beneath the Ross Ice Shelf (Antarctica) where the sea floor is 597 m below sea level and the water column 237 m thick (Bradford and Wells 1983).Gut contents analysis revealed that V. spinulosa had been feeding on the bait but it remains unknown whether this necrophagous (scavenging) habit is the only feeding strategy of the species, or indeed can be extrapolated to other members of the Bathyidia-lineage.Some species of the family Tisbidae are known to be omnivores and opportunistic feeders (Hicks and Coull 1983) and scavenging behaviour has previously been observed in Tisbe furcata (Baird, 1837) (Garstang 1900) and other members of the genus (Lee 2004;Lee and Morton 2004).Although the feeding strategy of Gyorome guttatum is not revealed, its large, vaulted prosome suggests an opportunistic macrophage that has adopted gorging.The flexible integument and posterodorsal extension of the prosome (in females only) presumable allows for considerable lateral and dorsal distension of the midgut in the similar way to the misophrioid one reported by Boxshall and Roe (1980).
Occasionally, other tisbid species have been recorded from the plankton in the neritic zone, but in most cases, these are temporarily displaced littoral forms (Wells 1970).Similarly, some littoral Tisbidae are known to disperse by clinging to marine algae (e.g., Sargassum) drifting in the open ocean currents but such species are not permanent members of the plankton and should be regarded as expatriated forms (Yeatman 1962).In seagrass beds, some tisbids as well as many other phytal harpacticoids demonstrate active emergence, particularly during nighttime, and their entry into the column appears to be linked to precopulatory mate behavior, as evidenced by the predominance of adult males and copepodid V females (Bell et al. 1988;Hicks 1988b;Walters and Bell 1986).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Gyorome guttatum gen.et sp.nov., adult female, paratype A right antennule, ventral view B right antenna C left mandible D right maxillule E right maxilla F left maxilliped, posterior view.Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Gyorome guttatum gen.et sp.nov., adult female, paratype A, B right leg 1, anterior and posterior views, respectively A', A'' distal exopodal (A') and endopodal (A'') segment of left leg 1, posterior view showing setae at full length C, D left leg 2 anterior and posterior views, respectively E, F left leg 3, anterior and posterior views, respectively G left leg 4, posterior view H endopod of left leg 4, anterior view I right leg 5, anterior view.Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Gyorome guttatum gen.et sp.nov., adult male, paratype A left antennule, ventral view A' segment 1 of left antennule showing detached seta B right maxilliped, anterior view C left basis of leg 1, posterior view D endopod of left leg 2, posterior view E right leg 5, anterior view.Abbreviation: RS, root of detached seta.Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

remota Discussion Taxonomic position of Gyorome gen. nov. within the Tisbidae
Within the family Tisbidae, Gyorome gen.nov.belongs to a close-knit group of exclusively planktonic deepwater genera, including Bathyidia, Neotisbella and Volkmannia (Table

Table 1 .
Morphological comparison of pelagic genera in the family Tisbidae.