A review of insect parasitoids associated with Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) in Italy. 1. Diptera Tachinidae and Hymenoptera Braconidae (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae)

Abstract This paper is aimed to summarize the information available on the parasitoid complex of the European Grapevine Moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) (Lepidoptera Tortricidae) in Italy. The list is the result of the consultation of a vast bibliography published in Italy for almost two hundred years, from 1828 to date. This allowed the clarification and correction of misunderstandings and mistakes on the taxonomic position of each species listed. In Italy the complex of parasitoids detected on EGVM includes approximately 90 species belonging to ten families of Hymenoptera (Braconidae, Ichneumonidae, Chalcididae, Eulophidae, Eupelmidae, Eurytomidae, Pteromalidae, Torymidae, Trichogrammatidae, and Bethylidae) and one family of Diptera (Tachinidae). This paper deals with EGVM parasitoids of the families Tachinidae (Diptera) and Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Only two species of Tachinidae are associated to EGVM larvae in Italy, Actia pilipennis (Fallen) and Phytomyptera nigrina (Meigen), whereas the record of Eurysthaea scutellaris (Robineau-Desvoidy) is doubtful. Moreover, 21 species of Braconidae are reported to live on EGVM, but, unfortunately, eight of them were identified only at generic level. Bracon mellitor Say has been incorrectly listed among the parasitoids of Lobesia botrana. Records concerning Ascogaster rufidens Wesmael, Meteorus sp., Microgaster rufipes Nees, and Microplitis tuberculifer (Wesmael) are uncertain.


Introduction
The European Grapevine Moth (EGVM), Lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) is an important pest in the grape-growing regions of Europe, the Middle East, northern and western Africa and southern Russia (CABI 2016a), whereas its occurrence in Japan has been invalidated (Bae and Komai 1991). This species was accidentally introduced in North and South America. It was found for the first time in California in 2009 (Varela et al. 2010, Gilligan et al. 2011, Ioriatti et al. 2012), in Chile in 2008(Gonzalez 2010, Ioriatti et al. 2012 and in Argentina in 2010 (SENASA 2010, Ioriatti et al. 2012, SENASA 2016. EGVM massively appeared in the wine-growing areas of southern Europe (France, Italy, the Iberian Peninsula) at the end of 1800. A century before, the species had been named but not described by Schiffermüller (1775 and1776) as Tortrix botrana.
The taxonomic history of EGVM is rather complicated; over time the species has been attributed to various genera or it has been misinterpreted as different species, generating confusion in biological data and at the synonymic level. In the "Datasheet Report" for European Grapevine Moth of CABI (2016a) this confusion is still present and the list of "Other Scientific Names" shows synonymies, mainly due to misinterpretation, which are no longer valid: Tortrix reliquana Hübner, 1825 (= Lobesia reliquana) is a valid species; Penthina vitivorana Packard, 1869 is synonym of Paralobesia viteana (Clemens, 1860); Tinea "premixtana" is a wrong spelling for Tortrix "permixtana" Hübner, 1796, probably the Tortrix permixtana auct. nec Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775, which is synonymous with the aforementioned L. reliquana (Hübner) (cf. Brown 2005, Fauna Europaea). Finding papers with the original reports, in the continuous transfer from a publication to another, has required a lot of work and the appreciated help of various colleagues. The continuous progress of the taxonomic knowledge and the numerous changes that have been and are still proposed, required supervision and updating of the names of the species attributed by the former authors, especially those who published their data before the second half of 1900.
Since its first record, EGVM had been associated with the grapevine (Denis and Schiffermüller 1775). Subsequently, its biology and its damage to the grapevine was defined (Jacquin 1788, Kollar 1837[1840). It is only in the second half of the 19 th century that the species fully showed its aggressiveness, alarming wine-makers and attracting the interest of applied entomologists. In Italy the first report of L. botrana is attributed to Oronzo Gabriele Costa (1828), who found the moth in the Otranto surroundings (Apulia) on Olea europaea L. inflorescences, and classified the species as Noctua romana, later replaced by Noctua romaniana (OG Costa 1840, A. Costa 1857, 1877, Del Guercio 1899, Silvestri 1912, Tremewan 1977. In 1849 Semmola described the damage on the grapevine in the Vesuvian region of Naples (A. Costa 1857). In 1869 Levi, in a paper on the grape moth "Tortrix Uvae" or "uvana", E. ambiguella, which heavily infested vineyards near Gorizia, mentioned the presence of three larvae of a second "grape worm", which he found before the harvest, and whose larva was characterized by a "… more lively and spirited temperament that made him squirming and slipping from the hands like an eel", and which he attributed to Tortrix vitisana that is today a synonym for L. botrana. He recalls the subject a few years later (Levi 1873), with news on parasitoids of E. ambiguella. At the same time, Dei (1873) assigned to L. botrana the liability of the heavy damage caused to the grapevine in Trieste district and in other parts of Italy (Ioriatti and Anfora 2007). Also Ghiliani (1871) and De Stefani (1889) mentioned the species (as Lobesia permixtana) for its damage to grape.
In 1899, Del Guercio described in detail the morphology and the behavior of EGVM, providing the first list of seven parasitoids obtained from larvae and pupae collected in the vineyards of Tuscany. In a paper dealing with Italian Chalcidoidea, Masi (1907) reported three species emerged from EGVM, one of which he described as Dibrachys affinis. Later on, he named another Chalcidoid as Elachistus affinis, also obtained from EGVM (Masi 1911).
At the time when Paul Marchal in France was publishing an important work on EGVM (1912), in Italy Giulio Catoni (1910Catoni ( -1914 and Filippo Silvestri (1912) carried out their investigations, in Trentino-South Tyrol and Campania (Portici-Naples) respectively, publishing interesting information on EGVM.
With the impressive collections of pupae of the first spring-summer generation and of the overwintering second generation, Catoni collected EGVM and EGBM individuals in varying proportions, although frequently EGVM was more abundant. The purpose of his investigations was to provide a valid argument to declare as mandatory the "autumnal application of bands and rags to the vine stems" with the aim to collect the migrating larvae, prevent moth emerging and allow parasitoid spreading. From these pupae Catoni obtained 15 species of parasitoids (Catoni 1914). Silvestri (1912) described rather accurately the morphology and habits of EGVM, providing comprehensive information of 26 species of parasitoids. These important contributions are followed by the list of EGVM parasitoids reported in Italy until the year 1911 by Gustavo Leonardi (1925), who mentioned 21 species, and by Francesco Boselli (1928), who listed 42 species from 1911 to 1925. The results of Catoni and Silvestri describing EGVM parasitoids were then mentioned by Stellwag (1928) and reviewed by Thompson (1946).
After a long period of time of nearly 70 years, in which the essays on EGVM parasitoids were very rare, in the 1990s Marchesini and Dalla Montà (1994) published a long list of parasitoids associated to EGVM in the Veneto vineyards. With the introduction of the IPM (Integrated Pest Management) principles, the role of natural enemies was more and more emphasized and the interest for the EGVM parasitoids in Italy came back, and the investigations -though occasional -were never interrupted to date.
The other vine moth, Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner, 1796) (European Grape Berry Moth, EGBM) was recognized as the major grape berry pest in Europe until the 1920s (Berlese 1900, Solinas 1962, Bovey 1966. More recently and in many areas, it has been gradually replaced by L. botrana. The shift started in the Mediterranean Basin and is now extending -for climatic reasons -to Central Europe, where populations of EGVM and EGBM overlap.
Extensive scientific efforts are still needed to develop biological control as an effective solution for practical use in the field. Egg parasitoids of the genus Trichogramma have been mass-released in a inundative strategy with variable results (Castaneda-Samayoa et al. 1993, Hommay et al. 2002, Ibrahim 2004, though they can be frequently found in cultivated and natural environments (Barnay et al. 2001, Ibrahim 2004. The pteromalids Dibrachys affinis Masi and D. cavus (Walker) are gregarious generalist larval-pupal parasitoids of Lepidoptera, Diptera and Hyme-noptera that can be readily reared in the laboratory. However, due to the lack of host specificity and because they can also behave as hyperparasites, they have not considered as good candidates for biological pest control. An ichneumonid species, Campoplex capitator Aubert, is known as the most frequent and efficient parasitoid of EGVM in European vineyards. It is a larval parasitoid that has been regarded as the best candidate for future EGVM biological control programs. Substantial releases have not taken place because of the difficulties associated with artificially mass-rearing of the species (Thiéry and Xuéreb 2004).
The limited knowledge of the field efficacy of EGVM natural enemies has recently come to light for the questions raised in this regard by some American entomologists, who persistently questioned the potential of the biological control for EGVM management (Varela et al. 2010). In this respect, there is an urgent need to check the existing literature with the aim to critically revise the taxonomic nomenclature, assigning to each species its valid name and assessing their potential as biocontrol agents.
We fully agree with what was written by William Robin Thompson in the "Catalogue of Parasites and Predators of Insects Pests" (published under his direction in several volumes from 1943 to 1972) concerning the introduction of natural enemies of insect pests accidentally introduced in a new country: "… it is necessary to know the identity and habits for the parasites and predators attacking the pest in its native home. The name and habits of the natural enemies of many pests are recorded in the literature, but it is usually a very difficult and tedious task to assemble the information. A comprehensive list or catalogue of the predators of injurious insects, with the reference to the original papers in which they were recorded is, therefore, one of the fundamental necessities in biological control work." (Thompson 1943).
Among the difficulties that can arise when compiling these lists, Thompson suggests mainly the "inaccuracy in observation, rearing work and identification contained in the works of former authors, which greatly limits their practical value." Many past mistakes of unusual parasitoid species associated to EGVM in Italy might be due to a poor lab management of the field collection. We should take into consideration that Catoni (1910-14), Ruschka and Fulmek (1915) and, more recently, Colombera et al. (2001), have proposed lists of parasitoids obtained by clusters where the two vine moths were possibly present, without indicating from which individual each parasitoid was obtained. Nevertheless, it is also true that often the two tortricids may share the same parasitoids (see e.g.: Villemant et al. 2012, tableau 2.9). Those parasitoids have often a fairly broad host range and can attack suitable hosts living in the same environment, on the same plant, and even on the same cluster (Loni et al. 2012, Scaramozzino et al. in press).
Over time, the observations and the rearing techniques have been refined and rarely constitute a serious obstacle to this type of investigation. On the other hand, there is still a great difficulty in parasitoid and predator identification, which is intrinsic to the vastness and complexity of the taxonomic groups to which they belong. This paper deals with Diptera Tachinidae and Hymenoptera Braconidae and aims to be the first contribution of a revised and updated list of the Italian parasitoids of L. botrana.

Lobesia botrana and its parasitoids in Italy
The Italian records on EGVM parasitoids are a fragmented patchwork. This paper includes data from fewer than half of the Italian regions (nine of 20), and most of these data come from the northern part of Italy (Trentino-South Tyrol 37 species, Veneto 31 species, Piedmont 25 species) followed by Sardinia (22 species) Tuscany (20 species), Campania (19 species), Apulia (7 species), and Sicily and Umbria (1 species). An important part of the information (e.g.: Trentino-South Tyrol, Campania, Tuscany, Umbria and Sicily) comes from works published between the end of 19 th and early 20 th centuries, and some specific identifications are not responding to current taxonomic criteria, so requiring an accurate revision.
Most of the data result from studies conducted in the vineyards (approx. 85 species recorded in 29 papers) and some from the spurge flax (Daphne gnidium L.) in natural or semi-natural environments (appox. 15 species and 6 papers). In some contributions, mostly focused on general aspects, such as for example the grapevine protection from EGVM attacks, the reports on parasitoids are marginal and not very consistent.
The origin, quality and consistency of the data are not uniform and reflect the absence, in certain regions, of people with the necessary scientific knowledge and skill to carry out this type of investigation.
The list of parasitoid species feeding on L. botrana in Italy was drawn up using all the papers published on the subject, both in Italy (Table 1) and worldwide. We also revised the lists of parasitoids compiled by Thompson (1943), Coscollá (1997), Hoffman and Michl (2003) and by CABI (2016b). The names of the species have been verified and updated by following the on-line "Home of Ichneumonoidea" and flashdrive Taxapad databases of Yu et al. (1997Yu et al. ( -2012Yu et al. ( , 2012, Noyes (2014) and the Fauna Europaea (de Jong et al. 2014).
Various names are not related to any species currently known and are considered "nomina dubia", while some misspellings have been amended. The list contains the names used by the different authors in their publications and those updated according to the sources mentioned above. Names no longer valid are preceded by a dot and are followed by the name of the authors who used them. Within the list, the species are divided by Order and Family and sorted alphabetically. Valid names are in bold. Synonyms, misspellings, combinations other than those valid today, are in a smaller font and show in square brackets the valid name. The papers examined and included in the list are sorted alphabetically and consecutively numbered. These numbers are shown in the table, in the columns of the main geographical areas in which Italy can be divided: northern Italy (indicated by NORTH and including the Regions of Valle d'Aosta, Piedmont, Liguria, Lombardy, Trentino-South Tyrol, Veneto, Friuli-Venezia Giulia and Emilia-Romagna); Central Italy (shown with CENTER and including Tuscany, Marche, Umbria, Lazio and Abruzzo), southern Zangheri S, Dalla Montà L, Duso C (1987) Italy (indicated with SOUTH, including Campania, Molise, Apulia, Basilicata and Calabria), Sicily and Sardinia. In two separate columns we indicated if the record is earlier or later than 1970. If the species has been recorded before and after that date, it is shown on both columns.

Results
The complex of parasitoids detected on EGVM in Italy includes some 90 species belonging to ten families of Hymenoptera (Braconidae, Ichneumonidae, Chalcididae, Eulophidae, Eupelmidae, Eurytomidae, Pteromalidae, Torymidae, Trichogrammatidae and Bethylidae) and one family of Diptera (Tachinidae). More than fifty species belong to Ichneumonidae, followed by Braconidae with 21 species, Eulophidae eight species, Trichogrammatidae six species, and Pteromalidae five species. All the other families are represented by one or two species. The parasitoids of EGVM, belonging to the families Tachinidae (Diptera) and Braconidae (Hymenoptera), reported in Italy by various authors (see Table 1) are listed in Table 2. Italian distribution of reared parasitoids. Tuscany: Scaramozzino et al. (in press). Distribution. Palearctic species widely distributed, present, with few exceptions, all over Europe; to the east it reaches the Kuril Islands and Japan through southern Siberia and Mongolia (Andersen 1996).
Host range. It is a rather polyphagous species: little more than fifteen hosts are known, mostly belonging to the family Tortricidae (Mesnil 1963, CABI 2016b. Martinez (2012) points out that this species has been obtained by Sparganothis pilleriana (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775), another important tortricid pest of the grapevine, but, curiously, it has not been found on the European grapevine moth yet. Recently, Delbac et al. (2015) obtained a single specimen of this tachinid fly from L. botrana in a Bordeaux vineyard. Unlike Phytomyptera nigrina (see below), in this case the maggot of A. pilipennis abandons the dead caterpillar and pupate nearby.
Ecological role. During a research carried out in the natural reserve of Migliarino-San Rossore-Massaciuccoli, Pisa), we have obtained quite often specimens of this Tachinid from larvae of the three generations of EGVM and from larvae of Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hübner, 1799), both living on the shoot tips of Daphne gnidium (Scaramozzino et al. in press). In the natural reserve, the species has been raised in small number by EGVM from 2012 to 2015. In 2014 the overall rate of parasitism was quite low, not even reaching 1%. Table explanation. First column shows: 1-Order and Family to which the parasitoid belongs (e.g.: DIPTERA Tachinidae), 2 -Valid specific names of parasitoids in bold italics followed by the author who described the species and the year of description. The author's name and the year are in parenthesis if the species is assigned to a genus different from the original description (e.g.: Itoplectis alternans (Gravenhorst, 1829) was described and included in 1829 by Gravenhorst in the genus Pimpla while it is now assigned to the genus Itoplectis), 3 -Names that are in synonymy, or which relate to combinations genus-species no longer valid and to incorrect spellings, as found in the works cited in the references. These names are preceded by a black dot and are followed by the valid name in bold and in square brackets to which it refers in the list (e.g.: Phytomyptera nitidiventris

Rond. [= Phytomyptera nigrina]).
Second column includes, only for the valid species, the relating subfamily. Third column titled "<1970", are indicated with a dot the valid species recorded before that date. Fourth column titled "> 1970", are indicated with a dot the valid species recorded after that date. Columns "North", "Center", "South", "Sicily" and "Sardinia" the records that refer to a specific area are shown by a number (which refers to the work mentioned in the "references"), with in parenthesis the name used in the message if it differs from that of the valid species [e.g.: 4 (as Phytomyptera nitidiventris)].

Phytomyptera nigrina (Meigen, 1824) (Pn)
Among the Tachinidae living on the vine moths, Pn shows the lowest number of hosts. For more details, see Martinez et al. (2006) and with regard to the hosts reported in Italy see Cerretti and Tschorsnig (2010). As known, Pn larva hatches from an egg placed on the integument of the victim and, once actively penetrated, consumes its internal or-   and MP (methyl-parathion) (2) Data obtained in vineyards with chemical defense or biological defense.
gans and kills it (Bagnoli and Lucchi 2006). The existence of the puparium inside the host cocoon tight to the skin of the larva is a distinctive character for the species (Fig. 2F). Though Pn plays an important role in the natural control of L. botrana, especially reducing the summer population (Bagnoli andLucchi 2006, Thiery et al. 2006), it was not considered suitable for the control of Paralobesia viteana in the US, because of its relatively low host specificity, the low rate of parasitism reported in nature, and, referring in general to Tachinidae, due to previous experiences of unsuccessful releases (Martinez et al. 2006). Ecological role. Its importance as parasitoid depends on the host generation; indeed, various authors found that the parasitism rates are more generally related to the EGVM antophagous generation on grapevine: in this case they can overcome 25% of parasitism rate, both on grapevine in Apulia (Laccone 1978) and on Daphne gnidium in Sardinia (Luciano et al. 1988) (see table 2). In Tuscany, P. nigrina (Pn) was mostly found in the vineyards of the medium and lower Arno valley, especially on larvae of the anthophagous generation (Bagnoli and Lucchi 2006). In the natural reserve of San Rossore (Pisa), during several years of investigation carried out on D. gnidium, a single specimen of Pn was obtained from EGVM larvae of the second generation, collected in late July 2014 (Scaramozzino et al. in press), in contrast to observations carried out on the same host plant by other authors (see Table 3), whereas Actia pilipennis was more frequent in our case.
In Piedmont, Pn reached on the first generation of EGVM and EGBM, in two successive years, significant parasitization rates (17.3 and 6.5%), but it was virtually absent (only two individuals obtained) in the second overwintering generation (Colombera et al. 2001). Silvestri (1912) collected Pn from June to mid-October, Nuzzaci and Triggiani (1982) cited it as the more frequent parasitoid on D. gnidium in summer, with parasitism rates close to 30%. Laccone (1978) obtained Pn also in the second generation, with significant parasitization rates (from 11.4 to 14.7%). In Veneto, parasitization levels detected for this species were very low in the first generation (0.36 and 0.64%; Marchesini and Dalla Montà 1994), slightly higher, but with a significant 14.6%, in the second generation (Marchesini et al. 2006).
In France, Thiery et al. (2006) found Pn on the first generation of EGVM; they reported parasitization rates ranging from 5.2 to 41.2%. Pn has not been detected for the moment on EGVM overwintering generation, apart from what has been reported in the work of Colombera et al. (2001).

Eurysthaea scutellaris (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1848)
Discochaeta hyponomeutae Rond. : Forti 1991(in Coscollá 1997, Coscollá 1997. Notes. Coscollà (1997 refers that this tachinid fly is the only parasitoid obtained by Forti (1991) from larvae of EGVM second generation, with a rate of parasitism of 3.7%, though later on Roat and Forti did not mention this species in their list published in 1994. Cerreti andTschorsnig (2010) reported eight species of Lepidopteran host for E. scutellaris (mostly Yponomeutidae, but also Tortricidae and Geometridae) for Italy, but he did not mention L. botrana among them.
Ecological role. This species was obtained in low numbers during a three-year investigation in vineyards of table grapes in five locations of Apulia and has been associated to EGVM only by Moleas (1979).
Ecological role. In Apulia this species reached 9% of parasitization rate on EGVM larvae developing on Daphne gnidium in September.
Host range. The species is known as larval parasitoid of Lepidoptera Momphidae, Gelechiidae, Depressariidae and especially Tortricidae, including the vine tortrix moth S. pilleriana (Voukassovitch 1924, Villemant et al. 2012. Ecological role. Therophilus tumidulus was the second most frequent larval parasitoid of EGVM on Daphne gnidium in Sardinia, after P. nigrina, with parasitism rates ranging from 12.5 to 24.1% in the first generation and 8.6% in the third generation. Telenga (1934) mentioned this species as one of the main parasitoids of EGVM in Crimea vineyards.

Bracon mellitor Say, 1836
Goidanich 1931 Bracon vernoniae Ashm.: Leonardi 1925 Distribution. This species, distributed in North America from Canada to Mexico, is also present in Cuba, Brazil, Hawaii, while it is not present in Europe. In 1935 it was introduced from Hawaii into Egypt to control the Pink Bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders, 1844) (Lepidoptera Gelechiidae), but it seems not established (Bey 1951, Yu et al. 2012. Host range. Bracon mellitor lives on many hosts, mainly belonging to the Coleoptera Curculionidae and several families of Lepidoptera, especially Tortricidae, Pyralidae, Gelechiidae and Noctuidae (Yu 1997(Yu -2012Yu et al. 2012). Among these species are included the already mentioned P. viteana and L. botrana. The former was initially confused with L. botrana (see e.g. Johnson and Hammar 1912), and it is likely that the record of B. vernoniae on L. botrana reported by Leonardi (1925) originates from this mistake, since Marsh (1979) and Tillman and Cate (1989) did not include this moth among the hosts of this Bracon.
Ecological role. In Sardinia vineyards Delrio et al. (1987) obtained by L. botrana an unidentified species of Habrobracon which, along with other species (Elachertus affinis Masi, Agathis sp. and Chelonus sp.), emerged from 10-12% of the first generation larvae and from 5% of second and third generation larvae. The genus Habrobracon Ashmead, 1895 is also used in synonymy with Bracon Fabricius, 1804, in the Fauna Europaea, where nearly 250 species of this genus in Europe are listed.
Host range. Loni et al. (2016) found this species associated with EGVM for the first time. In the Nature Reserve of San Rossore, on Daphne gnidium, H. concolorans feeds on larvae of the three EGVM generations. It develops as ectoparasitoid on mature larvae, killing them before they make the cocoon, and showing both solitary and gregarious habits, with up to four individuals feeding on the same host larva. To date it is only known from 13 host species, mostly Lepidoptera (Gelechiidae, Noctuidae, Nymphalidae, Pyralidae, Tortricidae) and one Coleoptera Anobiidae . Moreover, H. concolorans is a major parasitoid of the highly invasive South American tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) (Biondi et al. 2013).
Ecological role. Habrobracon concolorans has been found associated to three other species of Braconinae (H. hebetor, H. pillerianae and Bracon admotus) that emerged from more than 1,200 EGVM samples collected in 2014 ) with a parasitization rate of 2.4%.
Host range. Highly polyphagous, it is known to attack various species of pyralid moths feeding on stored products, as well as other Lepidopterous pests on several cultivated plants (Yu et al. 2012). It is an idiobiont ectophagous and gregarious parasitoid of Lepidopteran larvae. In Loni et al. (2016) a list of records of H. hebetor found on EGVM is provided. Goidanich (1934), reviewing the specimens obtained from larvae of L. botrana and Ephestia elutella by Silvestri, assigns them to Habrobracon brevicornis. In 2014 Loni et al. (2016) obtained two females of this species from a larva of L. botrana feeding on D. gnidium. Under the name H. brevicornis it was known as a major parasitoid of the European Corn Borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner, 1796) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae), and, with the aim of controlling this pest, it was introduced and released in different locations in North America (Goidanich 1931, Marsh 1979, Yu et al. 2012. Fischer, 1980Loni et al. 2016 Italian distribution of reared parasitoids. Tuscany: Loni et al. 2016, Scaramozzino et al. (in press) Distribution. Currently this species is only found in Asian Turkey (Fischer 1980) and in Tuscany (Italy)  Host range and ecological role. Very little information is available on this species (Fischer 1980). This author described H. pillerianae on the basis of six specimens emerged from Sparganothis pilleriana in Central Anatolia (Turkey). We personally obtained this Braconid by EGVM larvae feeding on grapevine in Cerreto Guidi (FI) in June 2005 and August 2008 and on D. gnidium in San Rossore (Pisa), from late June to early September 2014 . Although it proved to be the most common species among the Braconinae found in S. Rossore (it accounted for about 6% of all collected parasitoids), the parasitism rate on L. botrana larvae was only around 1.3%.

Habrobracon pillerianae
Also in this species the larvae developed both solitary and gregariously, with up to three individuals feeding on the same host .
Italian distribution of reared parasitoids. Sardinia: Luciano et al. 1988  Tuscany: Bagnoli and Lucchi 2006Veneto: Marchesini and Dalla Montà 1992, Marchesini et al. 2006 Distribution. The species is present in Europe and North Africa; in Asia it is recorded up to Japan (for more details see: Yu 1997and Cabi 2016a. A. quadridentata was introduced in North America and New Zealand for the biological control of Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae).
Host range. This koinobiont egg-larval endophagous parasitoid feeds on various species of economically important moths, especially belonging to the family Tortricidae. Yu et al. (2012) provide a list of sixty-seven host species. In the vineyards it has been also associated to P. viteana and E. ambiguella.
Ecological role. As already highlighted by Bagnoli and Lucchi (2006), in Tuscany this parasitoid is usually present at low density in all the three generations of L. botrana. In Veneto it has never been obtained by larvae of the first generation, but reached a maximum rate of parasitism of 4.4% in the second generation and 2.7% in the third generation. In Sardinia it was obtained only from first generation larvae of EGVM living on D. gnidium, with a parasitism rate of 3.7%.
Host range. Koinobiont endophagous egg-larval parasitoid. The only record is due to Silvestri (1912) that frequently reared it in August from EGVM larvae. Like the previous species, it lives on microlepidoptera, especially Tortricidae.
Host range. Like the species of the genus Ascogaster, the Chelonus spp. are koinobiont egg-larval endophagous parasitoids of various groups of microlepidoptera and Noctuidae.
Ecological role. In Sardinia Delrio et al. (1987) obtained an unidentified species of Chelonus that, along with other species (Elachertus affinis Masi, Agathis sp. and Habrobracon sp.) parasitized 10-12% of the EGVM larvae of the first generation and 5% of the larvae of the second and third generations.

Subfamily: Exothecinae
Colastes sp. Colombera at al. 2001 Italian distribution of reared parasitoids. Piedmont: Colombera at al. 2001 Distribution and host range. Colastes Haliday, 1833 is a cosmopolitan genus represented in Europe by 15 species, which are, as all the members of the subfamily, idiobiont ectophagous solitary parasitoids on larvae of several leafminers (Shaw and Huddleston 1991). Only one specimen was obtained from the first generation larvae of EGVM in Piedmont.
Taxonomic notes. Apanteles is a polyphyletic complicated group, both for the high number of species and for the evident morphological convergence accompanied by the characters reduction. Mason (1981) divided this group in 26 distinct genera (see Whitfield et al. 2002).
The situation is still controversial and Mason's opinion is not accepted by all taxonomists of the group (see note 180 in Broad et al. 2012).
Host range. Like all Microgastrinae, Apanteles spp. are koinobiont endophagous larval parasitoids of Lepidoptera Ditrysia and are undoubtedly among the most important parasitoids of this order. For more details, see Shaw and Huddleston (1991).
Ecological role. In Apulia, an unidentified species of Apanteles was repeatedly found in September-October; this emerged from EGVM larvae living on D. gnidium, with a parasitization rate of approx. 20% (Nuzzaci and Triggiani 1982). Again, on D. gnidiun in Sardinia, another unidentified Apanteles was obtained both from EGVM larvae of first and third generation, with parasitization rates of 6.2% and 24.1% respectively (Luciano et al. 1988).

Laccone 1978
Italian distribution of reared parasitoids. Apulia: Laccone 1978 Distribution. Palaearctic species, widespread in Europe and in the former Soviet Union up to the east coast.
Host range. Yu (1997Yu ( -2012 provides a list of 33 species of Lepidopteran hosts including Tortricidae, Gelechiidae, Pterophoridae, Coleophoridae, Pyralidae and other families, plus two erroneous records: one species of Buprestidae and one of Curculionidae (Coleoptera). Among the hosts of A. albipennis is also recorded S. pilleriana (Ruschka and Fulmek 1915).
Ecological role. Specimens of this species were rarely obtained from EGVM larvae of first and second generation collected on vine in Apulia (Laccone 1978).
Taxonomic notes. In the past, the name "globata" was often referred to the European species of Microgaster Latreille, 1804, characterized by red hind femora. Nowadays we do not know exactly to what species the old quotes of many authors refer (Nixon 1968). This is probably the case of the records of Catoni (1914) and Schwangart (Stellwaag 1928). Recently Van Achterberg (2014) addressed the issue and eventually renamed M. globatus auctt. with the oldest available name Microgaster rufipes Nees, 1834.
The species is now reported in the Fauna Europaea as Microgaster rufipes Nees, 1834, but is still listed by Broad et al. (2012Broad et al. ( , 2016 and Yu et al. (2012) under the incorrect name of M. globata.
Host range. Yu et al. (2012) list fifty hosts, many of which are tortricids. Those of Catoni (1914) and Schwangart (Stellwaag 1928) are the only references of M. globata on L. botrana.
Host range. All the species of this genus are solitary or gregarious endoparasitoids of Lepidopteran larvae (especially Noctuidae).
Ecological role. Both Marchesini et al. (1994Marchesini et al. ( , 2006 and Colombera et al. (2001) have obtained a few specimens of an unidentified species of Microplitis by EGVM larvae of the second generation.
Host range. It is a solitary koinobiont endoparasitoid of Lepidopteran larvae (Noctuidae and Geometridae), and it is also reported on E. ambiguella in Austria, together with EGVM (Ruschka and Fulmek 1915), and Bulgaria (Balevski 1989, Yu et al. 2012. The only Italian records of this species on the two vine moths are due to Catoni (1914) and Ruschka and Fulmek (1915).
Host range. In most cases, the species of this genus live on larvae of macrolepidoptera, both diurnal and nocturnal and, to a lesser extent, on larvae of microlepidoptera, including tortricids. They are koinobiont larval endoparasitoids, and lay their eggs in the host young larva and pupate inside the mummified remains of the dead caterpillar. Three species of Aleiodes are associated with L. botrana. Nuzzaci and Triggiani (1982) obtained a single specimen of an unidentified species of Aleiodes by EGVM larvae living on D. gnidium.