Related articles by  
Other versions:
XML
PDF
cart
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • NanopubsNanopubs
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Materials and methods
    • Effect sizes
    • Bare unpooled effect sizes
    • Controlled unpooled effect sizes
    • Bare pooled effect sizes
    • Controlled pooled effect sizes
    • Effect size buckets
    • Plots and correlations
  • Results
    • Type 1 correction analysis
    • Levels analysis
    • Effect sizes by 2d
    • Effect sizes by categories
    • Pooled versus unpooled and bare versus controlled effect sizes
  • Conclusions and discussion
    • Pooled versus unpooled and bare versus controlled effect sizes
    • Statistical significance
    • Type 1 error corrections
    • Diagnosability
    • Differentiation below diagnosability, subspecies, and the 50% and 75% tests
    • Diagnosis based on actual data
    • Adapting
    • Amendments to the method
    • “Hard cut-offs” in existing models of species rank and their elimination
    • Note on
    • A new universal system for measuring differentiation
    • A new universal formula to determine taxonomic rank of allopatric populations using continuous variables
    • Example of using the test: Myrmeciza antbirds
    • What sorts of scores are good enough for assessing species and subspecies rank
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Powered by