Data Paper
Print
Data Paper
Assessment of the current state of biodiversity data for butterflies and skippers in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea)
expand article infoLuziany Queiroz-Santos, Fernando Maia Silva Dias§, Rafael Dell'Erba|, Mirna Martins Casagrande§, Olaf Hermann Hendik Mielke§
‡ Univerisdade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
§ Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
| Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Open Access

Abstract

Lepidoptera is one of the four megadiverse insect orders, comprising butterflies and moths. In Brazil, the bulk of knowledge about the butterfly fauna is restricted to some areas in the southeast of the country, with large gaps of knowledge in other areas. The state of Mato Grosso is one of the largest states in Brazil, and holds three of the main Brazilian biomes: Amazon rain forest, Cerrado and Pantanal. However, knowledge about Mato Grosso butterflies is fragmented and restricted to a few localities, and information is scattered in various sources. The aim of this study is to assemble the biodiversity information of the butterfly fauna of the state of Mato Grosso based on historical and recent literature data and collections carried out in the southwest of the state from 2007–2009. Records without precise locality data or taxonomic information were not included. Species identification was based on literature and comparison with specimens in collections; higher and species-level taxonomy were updated based on the Neotropical Checklist of Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea and recent phylogenetic and revisionary taxonomic works. In total, 901 species were recorded in 2,820 occurrence records. This represents 148 species of Hesperiidae, 29 Papilionidae, 28 Pieridae, 77 Lycaenidae, 238 Riodinidae, and 381 Nymphalidae. Of these, 207 species records are from the type specimens of species described in the state. Based on the results and literature records for other Brazilian states and biomes, probably the figures for Mato Grosso are underestimated, particularly in the families Hesperiidae, Lycaenidae and Riodinidae, in that order. Future collecting efforts should be directed towards certain areas of the state, especially in less sampled areas and biomes, as the north of the state and Pantanal.

Keywords

Biodiversity, Database, Amazon, Cerrado, Pantanal, Occurrence

Introduction

The butterflies are a highly suitable taxonomic group for assessing environmental disturbance and its impact on species conservation. They are effective biodiversity indicators; similarly, their charismatic appeal and biological peculiarities make them an effective “umbrella group” for biodiversity and habitat conservation (Brown Jr 1992, Brown Jr and Freitas 1999, Santos et al. 2008).

Gathering species distribution data is essential for any practical decision about species conservation (Lewinsohn and Prado 2002). However, even though interest in the conservation of biodiversity has recently increased, species inventories and lists are still lacking (Mielke et al. 2008), and the bulk of the knowledge about the butterfly fauna of Brazil is restricted to a few areas in the southeast of the country, with large gaps of knowledge in other areas (Santos et al. 2008). Along with many other organisms, butterflies are threatened by the destruction and fragmentation of their natural habitats (Emery et al. 2006) and therefore efforts to gather local and regional species lists should be intensified before natural habitats have been altered by anthropic landscapes (Lewinson and Prado 2005).

The state of Mato Grosso is potentially highly biodiverse because three of the main Brazilian biomes are present within its borders: Amazon tropical rainforest, Cerrado and Pantanal. However, knowledge about Mato Grosso butterflies is fragmentary and information is scattered throughout various sources (Santos et al. 2008). Given the absence of comprehensive regional lists for most of the Brazilian states, the aim of this study is to accrue and present the biodiversity data for the butterfly fauna in the state of Mato Grosso, based on literature data from the years 1895 to 2015, and collections carried out in the southwest region of the state from 2007 to 2009. Additionally, records assigned to the state of Mato Grosso in error are corrected.

General description

Additional information: The authors would like to thank Marcelo Duarte (MZUSP) and Geraldo Lamas (UNMSM) for providing access to essential literature, Marcelo Medaglia for help with maps and georeferencing, and Fábio Santos for suggestions about the manuscript and Keith M. Bayless for reviewing the English version of the manuscript. We also would like to thank the following researchers for help in the identification of specimens: Alfred Moser (Lycaenidae), Eduardo Carneiro (Hesperiidae), Diego Dolibaina (Riodinidae), Thamara Zacca (Satyrinae), Eduardo Barbosa for species of Hermeuptychia, and Lucy Mila Salik (Biblidinae). The authors would like to thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for the fellowships granted to the authors (LQS: 130624/2014-1, CNPq; FMSD: Edital 15/2014, CAPES/EMBRAPA; RD: CAPES; MMC: 308247/2013-2, CNPq; OHHM: 304639/2014-1, CNPq).

Project details

Project title: Assessment of the current state of biodiversity data for butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil

Personnel: Luziany Queiroz-Santos, Fernando Maia Silva Dias, Rafael Dell’Erba, Mirna Martins Casagrande, Olaf Hermann Hendrik Mielke

Funding: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Study area descriptions/descriptor: Mato Grosso is located in the central-western part of Brazil, with an area of 903,378,292 km², making it the third largest state in Brazil. The state has three different climate zones: in lower elevations, there is a tropical monsoon climate, with rainy summers and dry winters and an average temperature of over 24°C; and also a tropical rainforest climate, with no distinct seasons, heavy rainfall, and average temperature of 23°C; and in higher elevations, there is a subtropical climate, with an average temperature of 17°C. Most regions are at low to medium elevations, with areas from about 100 meters in the southwest and northern areas, reaching up to 1,118 meters above sea level; nevertheless, about two thirds of the state is below 600 meters in elevation. Mato Grosso is drained by streams that flow north to the Amazonas drainage basin (e.g. Juruena, Teles Pires, and Xingu rivers), east to the Tocantins-Araguaia river basin (e.g. Araguaia River), and south to the Paraná river basin (e.g. Cuiabá River).

Design description: The list of diurnal butterflies occurring in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil, was compiled based on faunistic studies, species descriptions and other taxonomic literature, and specimens collected by the first author in field expeditions carried out between November 2007 and January 2009 in the municipality of Pontes e Lacerda, southwestern Mato Grosso.

The first records of butterflies from the state of Mato Grosso are the type localities of species described by Fruhstorfer (1895) and Godman and Salvin (1896); in the following years, several authors added records to the state. The Talbot and Collenette expedition was the first significant contribution to the knowledge of the butterfly fauna of Mato Grosso; two papers, both published in 1928, provide several records and descriptions of new taxa. The results of the Rondon expedition led by Miranda-Ribeiro (1931), records provided by Brown Jr. (1979, 1987), and data available in the illustrated guide by Garwood et al. (2009), stand out as important sources of occurrence records. A total of 2,820 individual occurrence records were included in the database; of the 901 species recorded, 207 are from type localities of descriptions of taxa and 102 from the three years of field work in the municipality of Pontes e Lacerda. Of these, 31 species were not recorded before in the literature to Mato Grosso. The highest number of records are from Nymphalidae (381 species in 1,669 records), followed by Riodinidae (238 species in 605 records) and Hesperiidae (148 species in 177 records). The families with the least number of both species and records are Lycaenidae (77 species in 105 records), Pieridae (28 species in 151 records) and Papilionidae (29 species in 94 records).

Data published through

GBIF: http://ipt.sibbr.gov.br/sibbr/resource?r=ufpr_borboletasmt

Taxonomic coverage

General taxonomic coverage description: The taxonomic coverage of this dataset spans the diurnal butterflies, which includes superfamilies Hesperioidea (with one family, Hesperiidae) and Papilionoidea (with five families, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae, Lycaenidae and Riodinidae). The highest number of records in the study area are from Nymphalidae (381 species in 1,669 records), followed by Riodinidae (238 species in 605 records) and Hesperiidae (148 species in 177 records). The families with the least number of both species and records are Lycaenidae (77 species in 105 records), Pieridae (28 species in 151 records) and Papilionidae (29 species in 94 records).

Taxonomic ranks

Kingdom: Animalia

Phylum: Arthropoda

Class: Insecta

Order: Lepidoptera

Family: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Riodinidae, Nymphalidae, Lycaenidae, Hesperiidae

Common names: Animals, Arthropods, Insects, Butterflies and Moths, Swallowtails, Sulphurs and Whites, Metalmarks, Brush-footed Butterflies, Blues, Coppers and Hairstreaks, Skippers

Spatial coverage

General spatial coverage: This dataset collates species occurrences from the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso. Most regions are at low to medium elevations, with areas from 100 meters in the southwest and northern limits, reaching up to 1,118 meters above sea level, however, about two thirds of the state is below 600 meters in elevation.

Coordinates: 18°7'12"S and 7°22'48"S Latitude; 61°36'0"W and 50°23'60"W Longitude

Figure 1. 

Occurrence localities of butterflies and number of species per locality in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil.

Temporal coverage: 1895 - 2015

Natural collections description

Collection name: Coleção Zoobotânica “James A. Ratter”, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Nova Xavantina, Mato Grosso, Brazil

Collection identifier: CZNX

Natural collections description

Collection name: Coleção Entomológica Padre Jesus Santiago Moure, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Collection identifier: DZUP

Specimen preservation method: Mounted

Methods

Method step description: Compilation of occurrence data from the literature, and data of the specimens collected between November 2007 and January 2009 in the municipality of Pontes e Lacerda, southwestern Mato Grosso.

Study extent description: Literature and specimens between November 2007 and January 2009 in the municipality of Pontes e Lacerda, southwestern Mato Grosso.

Sampling description: The list of diurnal butterflies occurring in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil, was compiled based on faunistic studies, species descriptions and other taxonomic literature (Fruhstorfer 1895; Godman and Salvin 1896, Godman and Salvin 1898, Godman 1900, Godman 1903, Druce 1904, Godman 1905, Druce 1907, Stichel 1909, Fruhstorfer 1910a, Fruhstorfer 1910b, Niepelt 1910, Stichel 1910, Weymer 1911, Fruhstorfer 1912, Röber 1913, Fruhstorfer 1915, Stichel 1915, Fruhstorfer 1916a, Fruhstorfer 1916b, Oberthür 1916, Stichel 1916a, Stichel 1916b, Seitz 1917, Reverdin 1919, Stichel 1919, Lathy 1921, Riley 1921, Röber 1921, Skinner 1921, Martin 1923, Stichel 1923, Joicey and Talbot 1924, Riley 1924, Stichel 1924, Joicey and Talbot 1925, Neustetter 1925, Röber 1925, Lathy 1926a, Lathy 1926b, Stichel 1926, Williams 1926, Williams 1927, Collenete and Talbot 1928a, Collenette and Talbot 1928b, D’Almeida 1928, Talbot 1928, Hall 1929, Riley 1929, Stichel 1929, Miranda-Ribeiro 1931, Lathy 1932, Le Moult 1932, Seitz 1932, Talbot 1932, D’Almeida 1935, Bell 1938, Williams and Bell 1939, D’Almeida 1941, Hayward 1942a, Hayward 1942b, Evans 1944, Goodson 1945, Dillon 1948, Evans 1951, D’Almeida 1952, Bryk 1953, Evans 1953, Evans 1955, D’Almeida 1958, Le Moult and Réal 1962–1963, Weber 1963, Mielke 1967, Mielke 1968, Brown Jr et al. 1970, Brown Jr 1973, Mielke 1978, Casagrande and Mielke 1979, Bristow 1981, 1982, 1991, De Jong 1983, Jenkins 1983, Brown Jr 1987, Steinhauser 1991, Blandin 1993, Johnson 1993, Burns 1994, Tyler et al. 1994, D’Abrera 1995, Mielke 1995, Hall and Willmott 1996, Johnson and Kruse 1997, Austin and Mielke 1997, Hall 1998, Callaghan 1999, Hall and Furtado 1999, Harvey and Hall 2002, Blandin 2007b, Garwood and Lehman 2009, Casagrande 2009, Dolibaina et al. 2013, Dorval et al. 2013, Kaminski et al. 2015). Only occurrences explicitly recorded in a locality within the limits of the state of Mato Grosso were acknowledged, therefore, approximately 470 species of Hesperiidae listed by Brown Jr (1987) were not recorded, as his list also contains data from neighboring states. Similarly, occurrences without precise taxonomic information (e.g. unidentified species, species noted with “cf.”, “aff.”, “?”, and uncertain identifications, when explicitly stated, etc.) were not included. Due to factual errors and successive changes in the political boundaries of the states of Brazil, some records of type specimens supposedly from “Mato Grosso” (Lamas 2004, Mielke 2005a,b,c,d,e,f) actually belong to the Brazilian states of Rondônia, Mato Grosso do Sul or Pará. The type localities of these species were corrected, based on the information provided in the original descriptions and assigned to the correct state. Additionally, data from specimens collected by LQS in field expedition carried out between November 2007 and January 2009 in the municipality of Pontes e Lacerda, Mato Grosso were included. Specimens were actively collected with standard entomological nets, mounted, labeled, identified, and deposited at the Coleção Zoobotânica “James A. Ratter”, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Nova Xavantina (CZNX).

Higher and species-level taxonomy of all records were checked and updated, based on Blandin (1988), McAlpine (1971), Jenkins (1985), Jenkins (1990), Bristow (1981, 1982, 1991), Holzinger and Holzinger (1994), Tyler et al. 1994, Hall (1998), Hall (2000), Willmott (2003), Lamas (2004), Bálint (2005), Hall (2005), Blandin (2007a), Hall (2007), Austin (2008), Penz (2008), Faynel et al. (2012), Dolibaina et al. (2013), Ortiz-Acevedo and Willmott (2013), Seraphim et al. (2013), Zacca et al. (2013), Dias et al. (2014) and Díaz et al. (2014). Collected specimens were identified through direct comparison with specimens deposited at the Coleção Entomológica Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná (DZUP) and with the aid of specialists (see additional information).

Datasets

Dataset description

Object name: Darwin Core Archive Assessment of the current state of biodiversity data for butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea) in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil

Character encoding: UTF-8

Format name: Darwin Core Archive format

Format version: 1.0

Distribution: http://ipt.sibbr.gov.br/sibbr/archive.do?r=ufpr_borboletasmt

Publication date of data: 2016-03-30

Language: English

Licenses of use: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode).

Metadata language: English

Date of metadata creation: 2016-01-21

Hierarchy level: Dataset

References

  • Austin GT, Mielke OHH (1998) Hesperiidae of Rondônia, Brazil: Aguna Williams (Pyrginae), with a partial revision and descriptions of new species from Panama, Ecuador, and Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14(4): 889–965.
  • Austin GT (2008) Hesperiidae of Rondônia, Brazil: Taxonomic comments on “night” skippers, with discreptions of new genera and species (Lepidoptera: Eudaminae). Insecta Mundi 29: 1–36.
  • Bálint Z (2005) Systematic and taxomonic notes on neotropical hairstreak Lycaenids in connection to the genus Megathecla (Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini). Boletín Científico, Centro de Museos, Museo de Historia Natural 9: 278–294.
  • Bell EL (1938) A new genus and five new species of Neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera). American Museum Novitates 1013: 1–11.
  • Blandin P (1988) The genus Morpho – LepidopteraNymphalidae – Part 1 – The Sub-Genera Iphimedeia and Schwartzia. Sciences Nat, Venette, 1–50.
  • Blandin P (1993) The genus Morpho – LepidopteraNymphalidae – Part 2 – The subgenera Iphixibia, Cytheritis, Balachowskyna and Cypritis. Sciences Nat, Venette, 43–98.
  • Blandin P (2007a) The systematics of the genus Morpho, Fabricius, 1807 (LepidopteraNymphalidae, Morphinae). Hillside Books, Canterbury, 277 pp.
  • Blandin P (2007b) The genus Morpho. Part 3. Addenda to Part 1 and Part 2 & The subgenera Pessonia, Grasseia, and Morpho. Hillside Books, Canterbury, 138 pp.
  • Bristow CR (1981) A revision of the brassoline genus Catoblepia (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 72: 117–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1981.tb01655.x
  • Bristow CR (1982) A revision of the brassoline genus Selenophanes (Lepidoptera: Rophalocera). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 76: 273–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1982.tb02184.x
  • Bristow CR (1991) A revision of the brassoline genus Opsiphanes (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 203–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1991.tb00282.x
  • Brown Jr KS, Mielke OHH, Ebert H (1970) Os Ithomiinae do Brasil. I: Prittwitzia g.n. para Ithomyia hymenaea Prittwitz e suas subespécies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 30(2): 269–273.
  • Brown Jr KS (1973) The heliconians of Brazil (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Part V. Three new subspecies from Mato Grosso and Rondonia. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 13: 1–19.
  • Brown Jr KS (1979) Ecologia geográfica e evolução nas florestas neotropicais. PhD Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo.
  • Brown Jr KS (1987) Zoogeografia da região do Pantanal Mato-Grossense. In: Anais do Primeiro Simpósio sobre Recursos Naturais e Sócio-econômicos do Pantanal, Corumbá (Brazil), November 1984. Embrapa, Brasília, 137–178.
  • Brown Jr KS (1992) Borboletas da Serra do Japi: diversidade, habitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal In: Morellato LPC (Ed.) História natural da Serra do Japi: ecologia e preservação de uma área florestal no sudeste do Brasil.Unicamp/Fapesp, Campinas, 142–147.
  • Brown Jr KS (2009) Insetos indicadores da história, composição, diversidade e integridade de matas ciliares. In: Rodrigues RR, Leitão Filho HF (Eds) Matas ciliares: conservação e recuperação. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, Fapesp, São Paulo, 223–232.
  • Brown Jr KS, Freitas AVL (1999) Lepidoptera. In: Joly CA, Bicudo CEM (Eds) Biodiversidade do Estado de São Paulo: síntese do conhecimento ao final do século XX – Invertebrados Terrestres. Fapesp, São Paulo, 226–243.
  • Bryk F (1953) Lepidoptera aus dem Amazonasgebiete und aus Peru gesammelt von Dr. Douglas Melin und Dr. Abraham Roman. Arkiv för Zoologi (N.S.) 5(1): 1–268.
  • Burns JM (1994) Genitalia at the generic level: Atrytone restricted, Anatrytone resurrected, new genus Quasimellana - and yes! We have no Mellanas (Hesperiidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 48(4): 273–337.
  • Callaghan CJ (1999) New taxa of Neotropical Riodinidae (Lepidoptera). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 16(4): 1045–1064. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81751999000400014
  • Collenette CL, Talbot G (1928) Observations on the bionomics of the Lepidoptera of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 76(2): 391–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1929.tb01413.x
  • Casagrande MM, Mielke OHH (1979) Eurema (Eurema) furtadoi sp. n. de Mato Grosso, Brasil (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Dusenia (Curitiba) 11(3): 137–142.
  • Casagrande MM (2002) Naropini Stichel, taxonomia e imaturos (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Brassolinae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 19(2): 467–569. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81752002000200012
  • D’Abrera BL (1995) Butterflies of the Neotropical Region. Part VII – Lycaenidae. Hill House, Black Rock, 1098–1270.
  • D’Almeida RF (1928) Contribution a l’étude des Rhopalocères Américains. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 97(3/4): 369–388.
  • D’Almeida RF (1935) Terias plagiata, nov. nom. (Lep. Pieridae). Revista de Entomologia (Rio de Janeiro) 5(4): 504.
  • D’Almeida RF (1941) Uma nova subespécie de Iphiclides telesilaus (Felder, 1864). Arquivos de Zoologia do Estado de São Paulo 2(12): 319–320.
  • D’Almeida RF (1952) Novas espécies sul-americanas da família Ithomiidae (Lep. Rhopalocera). Boletim do Museu Nacional (Zoologia) 115: 1–4.
  • D’Almeida RF (1958) Espécies e subespécies novas de Ithomiidae (Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera). Boletim do Museu Nacional (Zoologia) 173: 1–17.
  • De Jong (1983) Rediscovery of the type of Papilio phineus Cramer and its bearing on the genera Phemiades Hübner and Propertius Evans (Hesperiidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 36(4): 279–289.
  • Dias FMS, Dolibaina DR, Mielke OHH, Casagrande MM (2014) Two new species of Esthemopsis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865 (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae: Symmachiini) from southeastern and northeastern Brazil, with taxonomic comments on Esthemopsis teras (Stichel, 1910) stat. rev. and Esthemopsis pallida Lathy, 1932 stat. nov. Zootaxa 3784(2): 148–158 doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3784.2.4
  • Díaz SDR, Dias FMS, Casagrande MM, Mielke OHH, Lamas G (2014) Notes on the geografic distribution and subspecific taxonomy of Sais rosalia (Cramer) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Ithomiini), including the first records in Paraguay. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 58(1): 11–18. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262014000100003
  • Dillon LS (1948) The tribe Catagrammini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Part 1. The genus Catagramma and allies. Reading Public Museum Scientific Publications 8: 1–120.
  • Dolibaina DR, Mielke OHH, Casagrande MM (2011) Borboletas (Papilionoidea e Hesperioidea) de Guarapuava e arredores, Paraná, Brasil: um inventário com base em 63 anos de registros. Biota Neotropica 11(1): 341–354. doi: 10.1590/S1676-06032011000100031
  • Dolibaina DR, Dias FMS, Mielke OHH, Casagrande MM (2013) Taxomonic of the ‘Synargis axenus complex’ species group, with a phylogenetic reassessment of the genus Synargis Hübner, 1819 (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae: Nymphidiini). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 168: 427–451. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12030
  • Dorval A, Ribeiro CMX, Filho OP, Souza MD, Jorge VC (2013) Distribuição vertical de ninfalídeos na Estação Ecológica de Iquê, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Enciclopédia Biosfera 16(9): 788–801.
  • Druce H (1904) Descriptions of some new species of butterflies belonging to the family Erycinidae from tropical South America. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1: 481–489.
  • Druce HH (1907) On Neotropical Lycaenidae, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 3: 566–632
  • Emery EO, Brown Jr KS, Pinheiro CEG (2006) As borboletas (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea) do Distrito Federal, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 50(1): 85–92. doi: 10.1590/s0085-56262006000100013
  • Evans WH (1944) An analysis of the genus Heliopetes Billberg (Lepidoptera-Hesperiidae) with genitalia drawings. Entomologist 77(979): 179–185.
  • Evans WH (1951) A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part I – Introduction and Group A Pyrrhopyginae. British Museum (Natural History), London, 102 pp.
  • Evans WH (1953) A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part III – Pyrginae. Section 2. British Museum (Natural History), London, 251 pp.
  • Evans WH (1955) A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV – Hesperiinae and Megathyminae. British Museum (Natural History), London, 504 pp.
  • Faynel C, Busby RC, Robbins RK (2012) Review of the species level taxonomy of the neotropical butterfly genus Oenomaus (Lycaenidae, Theclinae, Eumaeini). ZooKeys 222: 11–45. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.222.3375
  • Fruhstorfer H (1895) Noch mehr über Agrias. Entomologische Nachrichten 21(14): 217–220.
  • Fruhstorfer H (1910a) Neue Rhopaloceren aus der Provinz Matto Grosso und angrenzenden Gebieten. Entomologische Zeitschrift 24(35): 192–194.
  • Fruhstorfer H (1910b) Neue Agriasformen: Agrias godmani forma cyanecula und forma derufata nava [sic]. Entomologische Zeitschrift 24(34): 185.
  • Fruhstorfer H (1912) Neue Nymphaliden des neotropischen Gebietes aus der Sammlung Staudinger. Entomologische Rundschau 29(2): 14–15.
  • Fruhstorfer H (1915) 49. Gattung: Adelpha Hbn. In: Seitz A (Ed.) Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, 5, 513–528.
  • Fruhstorfer H (1916a) 54. Gattung: Ageronia Hbn. In: Seitz A (Ed.) Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, 5, 537–544.
  • Fruhstorfer H (1916b) 55. Gattung: Prepona Bsd. 56. Gattung Agrias Dbl. In: Seitz A (Ed.) Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, 5, 550–568.
  • Garwood K, Lehman R, Carter W, Carter G (2009) Butterflies of Southern Amazonia. McAllen Publishing, Texas, 374 pp.
  • Giovenardi R, Di Mare RA, Mielke OHH, Casagrande MM, Carneiro E (2013) Mariposas de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea). Revista Colombiana de Entomologia 39(2): 267–275.
  • Godman FD (1900) Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta. Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. Dulau & Co., Bernard Quaritch, London, 461–484 [156], 501–532 [158], 557–588 [160].
  • Godman FD (1903) Notes on some Central and South American Erycinidae, with descriptions of new species. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 4: 529–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1903.tb01147.x
  • Godman FD (1905) Descriptions of some new species of Satyridae from South America. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1: 185–190.
  • Godman FD, Salvin O (1896) Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta. Lepidoptera-Rhopalocera. Dulau & Co., Bernard Quaritch, London, 425–440 [131].
  • Godman FD, Salvin O (1898) Descriptions of new species of American Rhopalocera. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1898(1): 105–112.
  • Goodson FW (1945) Notes and descriptions of new species of American Theclinae contained in the British Museum (Natural History) (Lep. Lycaenidae). Entomologist 78(990): 169–171.
  • Hall A (1929) A revision of the genus Phyciodes Hübn. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Bulletin of the Hill Museum 3(1): 45–94.
  • Hall JPW (1998) A review of the genus Sarota (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Tropical Lepidoptera 9(1): 1–21.
  • Hall JPW (2000) Two new genera in the Neotropical Riodinid tribe Nymphidiini (Riodinidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 2(54): 41–46.
  • Hall JPW (2002) A phylogenetic revision of Calydna and relatives (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Insect Systematics & Evolution 33(2): 185–237. doi: 10.1163/187631202X00136
  • Hall JPW (2005) A Phylogenetic Revision of the Napaeina (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae: Mesosemiini). The Entomological Society of Washington, Washington, DC, 236 pp.
  • Hall JPW (2007) Two new genera in the Nymphidiina (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae: Nymphidiini). Zootaxa 1415: 35–42.
  • Hall JPW, Willmott KR (1996) Systematics of the riodinid tribe Symmachiini, with the description of a new genus and five new species from Ecuador, Venezuela and Brazil (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Lambillionea 4(1): 637–660.
  • Hall JPW, Furtado E (1999) Two new species and one subspecies of Riodinid from southwest Brazil (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Tropical Lepidoptera 10(1): 19–24.
  • Harvey DJ, Hall JPW (2002) Phylogenetic revision of the Charis cleonus complex (Lepidoptera: Riodinidae). Systematic Entomology 27: 265–300. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3113.2002.00173.x
  • Hayward KJ (1942a) A new species of Pyrrhopyge (Lep. Hesp.). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 44: 33–34.
  • Hayward KJ (1942b) Nuevas especies de hespéridos brasileños. Papéis avulsos do Departamento de Zoologia. Secretaria da Agricultura (São Paulo) 2(13): 171–177.
  • Heron FA, GF Hampson (1904) On the Lepidoptera collected at Chapada, Matto Grosso, by Mr A. Robert (Percy Sladen Expedition to Central Brazil). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2: 258–260.
  • Holzinger HKW, Holzinger R (1994) Heliconius and related genera. Sciences Nat, Venette, 328 pp.
  • Jenkins DW (1983) Neotropical Nymphalidae I. Revision of Hamadryas. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 81: 1–146.
  • Jenkins DW (1985a) Neotropical Nymphalidae III. Revision of Catonephele. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 92: 1–65.
  • Jenkins DW (1985b) Neotropical Nymphalidae IV. Revision of Ectima. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 95: 1–30.
  • Jenkins DW (1990) Neotropical Nymphalidae VIII. Revision of Eunica. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 131: 1–177.
  • Johnson K (1993) Neotropical hairstreak butterflies: New sister genera of the “Electrostrymon/Angulopis” grade of Eumaeini (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae). Reports of the Museum of natural History 32: 1–76.
  • Johnson K, Kruse JJ (1997) Colombian species of tailless “Cyanophrys” sensu lato and their sister taxa: priorities for biological study. Revista de Theclinae Colombianos 1(5): 1–35.
  • Joicey JJ, Talbot G (1924) Three new South American butterflies. Bulletin of the Hill Museum 1(3): 570–571.
  • Joicey J, Talbot G (1925) Notes on some Lepidoptera, with descriptions of new forms. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (9) 16(98): 633–653. doi: 10.1080/00222932508633356
  • Kaminski LA, Dell’Erba R, Barbosa EP, Freitas AVL (2015) New distribution records and notes on the habitat of Magneuptychia flavofascia Zacca & Siewert, 2014 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Check List 11(4): 1692. doi: 10.15560/11.4.1692
  • Lamas G (2004) Checklist: Part 4A, Hesperioidea – Papilionoidea. In: Heppner J (Ed.) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Association for Tropical Lepidoptera, Gainesville, 479 pp.
  • Lathy PI (1921) Notes et remarques sur les Agrias. Thèses Entomologiques (Lépidoptères) 1: 1–25.
  • Lathy PI (1926a) Notes on the American Theclinae (Lepidoptera). Annals and Magazine of Natural History (9) 17(97): 35–47.
  • Lathy PI (1926b) New species and forms of the genus Euselasia (Lepidoptera) in the Joicey collection. Entomologist 59(756): 143–146.
  • Lathy PI (1932) New species and races of Erycinidae (Lepidoptera). Annals and Magazine of Natural History (10) 9(49): 65–74.
  • Le Moult E (1932) Etudes sur les Prepona. Novitates Entomologicae 2(1): 1–16.
  • Le Moult E, Réal P (1962–1963) Les Morpho de l’Amérique du Sud et Centrale. Editions du Cabinet Entomologique E. Le Moult, Paris, 1–310 [1], 1–16 [2].
  • Lewinsohn TM, Prado PI (2005) Quantas espécies há no Brasil? Megadiversidade 1(1): 36–42.
  • Martin L (1923) The Fruhstorfer collection of butterflies. Catalogue of types with general account and list of the more interesting forms. J. Gastaud, Nice, 152 pp.
  • McAlpine WS (1971) A revision of the butterfly genus Catephelis (Riodinidae). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 10(1): 1–125.
  • Mielke OHH (1967) Notas sôbre o gênero Sarmientoia, com descrição de 4 espécies novas (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Boletim da Universidade Federal do Paraná (Zoologia) 2(13): 311–328.
  • Mielke OHH (1968) Lepidoptera do Planalto Central brasileiro. V: Novas espécies de Hesperiidae e anotações sôbre outras espécies conhecidas. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 28(4): 447–455.
  • Mielke OHH (1978) Revisão do gênero Lindra Evans (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 38(2): 269–287.
  • Mielke OHH (1995) Revisão de Elbella Evans e gêneros afins (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae, Pyrrhopyginae). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 11(3): 395–586. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81751994000300001
  • Mielke OHH (2005a) Catalogue of the American Hesperioidea (Lepidoptera). Vol. 1. Complementary and supplementary parts to the Checklist of the Neotropical Region. Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae: Pyrrhopyginae. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 125 pp.
  • Mielke OHH (2005b) Catalogue of the American Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Vol. 2. Pyrginae 1: Eudamini. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 291 pp.
  • Mielke OHH (2005c) Catalogue of the American Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Vol. 3. Pyrginae 2: Pyrgini. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 358 pp.
  • Mielke OHH (2005d) Catalogue of the American Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Vol. 4. Hesperiinae 1: Adlerodea – Lychnuchus. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 280 pp.
  • Mielke OHH (2005e) Catalogue of the American Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Vol. 5. Hesperiinae 2: Megaleas – Zenis. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 334 pp.
  • Mielke OHH (2005f) Catalogue of the American Hesperioidea: Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera). Vol. 6. Heteropterinae & Megathyminae. Index. Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia, Curitiba, 149 pp.
  • Mielke OHH, Emery OE, Pinheiro CEG (2008) As borboletas Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Hesperioidea) do Distrito Federal, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52: 283–288. doi: 10.1590/S0085-56262008000200008
  • Miranda-Ribeiro V (1931) Lepidópteros de Matto Grosso. Material colligido pelos senhores General Candido Rondon, Prof. Alípio de Miranda-Ribeiro e Emil Stolle. Boletim do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro 7(1): 31–52.
  • Neustetter H (1925) Drei neue Heliconius-Formen. Internationale Entomologische Zeitschrift 19(9): 60–61.
  • Niepelt FW (1910) Zwei neue Agrias-Formen. Internationale Entomologische Zeitschrift 4(34): 188.
  • Oberthür C (1916) La realité de l’idée de genre est demontrée par les Catagrammides (Lépidoptères Rhopalocères de l’Amérique méridionale). Études de Lépidoptérologie Comparée 11: 7–117.
  • Ortiz-Acevedo E, Willmott KR (2013) Molecular systematic of the butterfly tribe Preponini (Nymphalidae: Charaxinae). Systematic Entomology 38(2): 1–10. doi: 10.1111/syen.12008
  • Penz CM (2008) Phylogenetic revision of Eryphanis Boisduval, with a description of a new species from Ecuador (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Insecta Mundi 35: 1–25.
  • Reverdin JL (1919) Note sur Hesperia syrichtus Fab. Bulletin de la Société Lépidoptérologique de Genève 4(2): 96–107.
  • Riley ND (1921) Some undescribed Rhopalocera in the British Museum (Natural History). Entomologist 54(699): 180–184.
  • Riley ND (1924) A note on the genus Pyrrhopygopsis Godm. & Salv. (Lep. Hesperiidae). Entomologist 57(738): 245–249.
  • Riley ND (1929) Three new species of Hesperiidae from Matto Grosso. Bulletin of the Hill Museum 3(2): 134–138.
  • Robbins RK, Lamas G, Mielke OHH, Harvey DJ, Casagrande MM (1996) Taxonomic composition and ecological structure of the species-rich butterfly community at Pakitza, Parque Nacional del Hanu, Perú. In: Wilson DE, Sandoval A (Eds) The biodiversity of Southeastern Peru.Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 217–252.
  • Röber JKM (1913) 4. Gattung: Phyciodes Hbn. - 7. Gattung: Gnathotriche Fldr. In: Seitz A (Ed.) Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, 5, 434–448.
  • Röber JKM (1921) Ueber bekannte und neue Schmetterlinge. Entomologische Rundschau 38(2): 7–8.
  • Röber JKM (1925) Papilio ampliornatus sp. n. (Lepid.). Entomologische Mitteilungen 14(3/4): 235–236.
  • Santos EC, Mielke OHH, Casagrande MM (2008) Butterfly inventories in Brazil: the state of art and the priority-areas model research aiming at conservation. Natureza & Conservação 6: 176–198.
  • Schäffler O, Frankenbach T (2008) Vier neue Unterarten der Gattung Morpho Fabricius, 1807. Notes on Butterflies (Keltern) 1: 1–4.
  • Seitz A (1917) 8. Familie Erycinidae [continued]. In: Seitz A (Ed.) Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, 5, 657–664, 713–720.
  • Seitz A (1932) Goyaz-Reise. Entomologische Rundschau 49: 238–243.
  • Seraphim N, Marín MA, Freitas AVL, Silva-Brandão KL (2014) Morphological and molecular marker contributions to disentangling the cryptic Hermeuptychia hermes species complex (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae: Euptychiina). Molecular Ecology Resources 14: 39–49. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12161
  • Skinner H (1921) Two new species of Hesperidae (Lepid., Rhop.). Entomological News 32(8): 236–237.
  • Steinhauser SR (1991) Taxonomic notes and descriptions of new taxa in the Neotropical Hesperiidae. Part II. Heteropterinae and Hesperiinae, vinius group. Bulletin of the Allyn Museum 132: 1–79.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1909) Vorarbeiten zu einer Revision der Riodinidae Grote (Erycinidae Swains.). Berliner entomologische Zeitschrift 54(1/2): 1–48.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1910) Fam. Riodinidae. Allgemeines. Subfam. Riodininae. Genera Insectorum 112A: 1–238.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1915) Über Riodinidae des Britischen Museums und anschliessende Betrachtungen. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift 6: 657–700.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1916a) Neues über Genus Narope Westw. Neue Beiträge zur systematischen Insektenkunde 1: 7–8.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1916b) Nacharbeiten zur Revision der Riodinidae. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift 1: 3–24.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1919) Vorarbeiten zu einer Revision der Riodinidae Grote (Erycinidae Swains.) (Lep. Rhop.). IV. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift 3/4: 289–325.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1923) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Riodinidenfauna Südamerikas. IV. Nord-Brasilien (Grao-Pará). Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Insektenbiologie 12: 305–316.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1924) Nacharbeiten zur Revision der Riodinidae II. (Lep.). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift 5: 409–424.
  • Stichel HFEJ (1926) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Riodinidenfauna Südamerikas (Lep.). IX. Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift 2: 81–10. doi: 10.1002/mmnd.192619260202
  • Stichel HFEJ (1929) Nacharbeiten zur Revision der Riodinidae (Lep. Rhop.). IV. Mitteilungen aus dem zoologischen Museum in Berlin 15(1): 13–26.
  • Talbot G (1928) List of Rhopalocera collected by Mr C. L. Collenette in Matto Grosso, Brazil. Bulletin of the Hill Museum 2(3): 192–220.
  • Talbot G (1932) New species and forms of Lepidoptera from South America. Bulletin of the Hill Museum 4(3): 189–197.
  • Tyler HA, Brown Jr KS, Wilson KH (1994) Swallowtail butterflies of the Americas. A study in biological dynamics, ecological diversity, biosystematics, and conservation. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, 376 pp.
  • Weber E (1963) Neue und wenig bekannte Morphiden (Lep.). Entomologische Zeitschrift 73(3): 17–23.
  • Weymer G (1911) 4. Familie: Satyridae. In: Seitz A (Ed.) Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. Adolf Kernen, Stuttgart, 5, 193–200, 209–216.
  • Williams RC (1926) Studies in the Neotropical Hesperioidea. Paper I. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 52: 61–88.
  • Williams RC (1927) Studies in the Neotropical Hesperioidea. Paper II. Transactions of he American Entomological Society 53: 261–292.
  • Williams RC, Bell EL (1939) New species of Pellicia with remarks on the genus (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 65: 135–159.
  • Willmott KR (2003) The Genus Adelpha: Its Systematic, Biology and Biogeography (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Limenitidini). Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, 322 pp.
  • Zacca T, Mielke OHH, Pyrcz TW, Casagrande MM, Freitas AVL, Boyer P (2013) Stegosatyrus, a new genus of Euptychiina from the grasslands of neotropical realm (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Zootaxa 3682(2): 331–350. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.2.7
login to comment