Research Article |
Corresponding author: Gábor Kovács ( gabor.kovacs.arachnida@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Jeremy Miller
© 2015 Gábor Kovács, István Prazsák, János Eichardt, Gábor Vári, Henrik Gyurkovics.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Kovács G, Prazsák I, Eichardt J, Vári G, Gyurkovics H (2015) A new ladybird spider from Hungary (Araneae, Eresidae). ZooKeys 494: 13-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.8676
|
According to the most recent taxonomic literature, three species of the genus Eresus are known in Central Europe, E. kollari, E. sandaliatus and E. moravicus. We recognized a fourth distinctive species from Hungary, which is described as Eresus hermani sp. n. Eresus hermani has an early spring copulation period, females have a light grey (grizzled) cephalothorax due to a heavy cover of lightly colored setae, and an epigyne with large flat areas posterior to the epigynal pit, while males are distinguished by a broad and blunt terminal tooth of the conductor. An updated and modified comparative table of
Ladybird spiders, Eresus
The velvet spiders (family Eresidae) are among the most attractive spiders in Europe. The family contains nine genera and 96 described species worldwide. The genus Eresus Walckenaer, 1805 contains 15 valid species from Europe, Africa and Asia, of which nine occur in Europe (
According to the latest studies (
The long and complicated scientific history of the Eresus sandaliatus group sensu
The Hungarian spider fauna was first studied in detail by Ottó Herman, who also gave a detailed description of the Eresus genus (
However, subsequent authors (e. g.
Recently,
Eresus cinabarinus γ-color variant of
During an ongoing project aimed at mapping the distribution of Eresidae in Hungary, the presence of an Eresus species was observed with an early spring copulation period, which has unique morphological characters, and is described here as new to science.
Specimens were either collected individually or by using pitfall traps, and stored in 70% ethyl-alcohol.
We studied 31 males, 15 females and 6 juveniles of E. kollari; 20 males, 25 females and 4 juveniles of E. hermani sp. n., and 19 males, 11 females and 3 juveniles of E. moravicus, and 2 males, 3 females and 2 juveniles of E. sandaliatus. All the measurements are given in millimeters (mm).
All specimens of the new species examined, including holotype and four paratypes, have been deposited in the Soil Zoological Collection (former Arachnoidea Collection) of the Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum (HNHM) Budapest (curator Dr. László Dányi).
Specimens and copulatory organs were studied using a Leica MZ FL III stereomicroscope and photographed by Canon Q Imaging Micro 5.0 RTV at the Institute of Genetics, BRC. Scanning electron micrographs were taken with a Hitachi S-4700 microscope at the Department of Applied and Environmental Chemistry, University of Szeged, Hungary.
Standard abbreviations of morphological terms follow
HNHM Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest;
NHMW Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien;
PPI Plant Protection Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest;
JLPC private collection of Jørgen Lissner;
WPPC private collection of Walter Pfliegler.
Translation of Hungarian geographical names in the description of collection material is -hegy: hill; -völgy: valley.
Eresus cinnaberinus
Eresus kollari
Eresus kollari
Eresus kollari
Holotype: Female – HUNGARY, Budapest, Remete-hegy, N 47°32'26.3", E 19°00'24.1", singled, 23.04.2011., G. Kovács (HNHM, collection number: HNHM Araneae 7612).
Paratypes: 2 females – HUNGARY, Budapest, Sas-hegy, N 47°28'47.2", E 19°01'04.4", singled, 02.10.2013., G. Kovács, H. Gyurkovics, G., Vári, A. Rákóczi (HNHM, collection number: HNHM Araneae-7630-31). – 2 males HUNGARY, Budapest, Remete-hegy, N 47°32'26.3", E 19°00'24.1", singled, 23.04.2011., G. Kovács, (HNHM, collection number: HNHM Araneae: 7632–33).
The genus Eresus in Central Europe has a long and difficult nomenclatural history. Some available “old names” were examined, such as Eresus illustris (presently considered nomen dubium, specimens are irretraceable), which is marked as possibly Hungarian (despite the fact Koch himself wrote “Vaterland: Unbekannt” [trans. Locality: Unknown]), but discarded it on the basis of the description and color image (
A–H Habitus of living Eresus species, photographs: A–B Eresus hermani A female (Remete-hegy, Budapest, Hungary) B male (Farkas-hegy, Budaörs, Hungary) C–D Eresus moravicus C female (Misina-hegy, Pécs, Hungary) D male (Dürnstein, Austria) E–F Eresus kollari E female (Paloznak, Hungary) F male (Kéleshalom, Hungary) G–H Eresus sandaliatus G subadult female (near to Silkeborg Langsø, Enebærbakken, Denmark) H male (Nørlund, Hallundbæk Stream, Denmark) (D courtesy of Walter Pfliegler G–H courtesy of Jørgen Lissner).
Dedicated to Ottó Herman (1835–1914), the Hungarian arachnologist and polymath, who first recognized color variants within Hungarian Eresus forms, to commemorate the 100th anniversary of his passing.
Females of this species differ from all other Eresus females by the carapace’s short, off-white to light brown hairs, intermingled with small clumps of long, black hairs, giving a light, grizzled appearance to the prosoma, and by an epigyne with a pair of flat plateaus adjoining the sides of the broad median lobe laterally. Males are characterized by the narrow groove and blunt, broad terminal tooth of the conductor, and distinguished from other Eresus species, except E. moravicus, by having almost entirely red hind legs. They differ from E. moravicus males by having red color on the thoracic dorsum only laterally, having a less prominent cephalic region with an almost flat area between PLE and PME, and by narrower strips of white setae on L I. This species has an early spring copulation period, and exhibits a marked difference in the sizes of the sexes: males are relatively small, while females are comparatively large among Central European Eresus spp. (Table
Distinguishing morphological characters of species belonging to Eresus sandaliatus group (in part after
Eresus kollari Rossi, 1846 morphotype | Eresus sandaliatus Martini & Goeze, 1778 | |
---|---|---|
Females | ||
Prosoma length | 3.6–6.1 (mean 4.7) | 4.2–7.2 (mean 5.4) |
Color of prosoma | black, sparsely sprinkled with off-white to light brown setae, more heavily anteriorly (Fig. |
black, sparsely sprinkled with off-white to light brown setae, more heavily anteriorly (Fig. |
Epigyne | (i) epigynal pit extending all the way to posterior epigyne (Figs |
(i) epigynal pit extending all the way to posterior epigyne (Figs |
(ii) anterior 1/3 of fissures markedly incurvated sidewards, anterior tip usually not incurvated (Figs |
(ii) anterior 1/3 of fissures slightly inclined sideways, anterior tip weakly bent (Figs |
|
Vulva | (i) anterior section of copulatory ducts strongly sclerotized, usually elongated (Figs |
(i) anterior section of copulatory ducts weakly sclerotized, usually globular Figs |
(ii) spermathecae distinctly lobed (Figs |
(ii) spermathecae indistinctly lobed (Figs |
|
Approximate ratio between greatest width of ML and that of epigyne | 4:10 | 5:10 |
Males | ||
Prosoma length | 2.6–4.2 (mean 3.6) | 2.9–4.1 (mean 3.6) |
Number of black spots on opisthosoma | usually 4 | usually 6 |
White hairs on opisthosoma | usually present | usually absent |
Color of hind legs | proximally red, distally black (Fig. |
black, exceptionally with some red on femur (Fig. |
White transverse stripes on Leg I–II | narrow, covering only the distal edge of segments (Fig. |
very broad at the distal part of segments, widely extending into the proximal part of next segment (Fig. |
Red color on thoracic dorsum | only on flanks, at most a few red hairs posteriorly (Fig. |
only on flanks, at most a few red hairs posteriorly (Fig. |
Conductor in lateral view | moderately wrinkled, much longer than wide (Fig. |
almost smooth, about as long as wide (Fig. |
Terminal tooth of conductor | small, almost straight, pointed (Figs |
strong, long, almost straight, tip cropped (Fig. |
Groove of conductor in lateral view | shallow, V-shaped (Fig. |
deep, U-shaped (Fig. |
Eresus hermani sp. n. | Eresus moravicus Řezáč, 2008 | |
---|---|---|
Females | ||
Prosoma length | 6.6–9.9 (mean 8.2) | 5.9–9.9 (mean 7.5) |
Color of prosoma | entire prosoma grizzled light brown due to a heavy cover of off-white to light brown setae (Fig. |
black, except orange anterior (Fig. |
Epigyne | (i) flat plateaus between the posterior edge of epigynal pit and posterior of epigyne at sides of median lobe (Figs |
(i) epigynal pit extending all the way to posterior epigyne (Figs |
(ii) anterior ½ of fissures parallel to midline, anterior tip strongly incurved (Figs |
(ii) anterior ½ of fissures slightly diverging laterally, anterior tip strongly incurved–see note (Figs |
|
Vulva | (i) anterior section of copulatory ducts weakly sclerotized, usually globular (Figs |
(i) anterior section of copulatory ducts strongly sclerotised, usually elongated (Figs |
(ii) spermathecae strongly lobed (Figs |
(ii) spermathecae strongly lobed (Figs |
|
Approximate ratio between greatest width of ML and that of epigyne | 6:10 | 5:10 |
Males | ||
Prosoma length | 2.9–4.1 (mean 3.4) | 3.5–5.6 (mean 4.6) |
Number of black spots on opisthosoma | nearly always 4 | nearly always 4 |
White hairs on opisthosoma | nearly always present | nearly always present |
Color of hind legs | red, tarsal joints brownish grey (Fig. |
red, tarsal joints brownish grey (Fig. |
White transverse stripes on Leg I–II | narrow, covering only the distal edge of segments (Fig. |
broad at the distal part of segments, usually extending to the proximal end of next segment (Fig. |
Red color on thoracic dorsum | only on flanks, at most a few red hairs posteriorly (Fig. |
extends to the middle, at least posteriorly (Fig. |
Conductor in lateral view | wrinkled, clearly wider than long (Fig. |
wrinkled, somewhat longer than wide (Fig. |
Terminal tooth of conductor | strongly incurvated, broad and blunt (Fig. |
strongly incurvated, narrows to a relatively pointed tip (Fig. |
Groove of conductor in lateral view | deep, narrow, ν (Greek nu) or narrow U shaped (Fig. |
round (Fig. |
Male. Prosoma (Fig.
Chelicerae: Blackish-brown, covered by long, nearly adpressed black hairs; basal half with scattered white hairs on the front.
Legs: Legs I–II dark orange-brown with black hairs; Fe II and Pt II orange with red hairs, Ti II often with a dorsal patch of red hairs. Distal edges of Fe, Pt, Ti and Ta with narrow, white stripe dorsally, usually not extending to the proximal part of the next distal segment. Legs III and IV largely orange, covered with red hairs, Ta and Mt dull grayish-brown due to a mixture of reddish and black hairs, except for a proximo-dorsal patch of red on Mt.
Opisthosoma (Fig.
Palps (Fig.
Female. Prosoma (Fig.
Chelicerae: Dark orange brown, front of basal 1/3–3/4 same color as prosoma.
Legs: Rusty red, Fe, Pt, Ti and Mt of all legs covered by black hairs with pale brown hairs scattered among them, the latter gradually decreasing in number from L I to L IV, usually clustering to form indistinct cross bands dorsally at the distal edge of each segments. Ta usually black, except for a small cluster of pale hairs basally.
Palps: Similar in color to L I.
Opisthosoma (Fig.
Epigyne (Figs
Vulva (Figs
Females
1 | Anterior of cephalic region covered by bright yellow/orange setae | Eresus moravicus |
– | No bright yellow/orange setae on prosoma | 2 |
2 | Entire prosoma covered heavily by off-white to light brown setae; large | Eresus hermani sp. n. |
– | Prosoma sparsely sprinkled with lightly colored setae, somewhat more heavily on the front; smaller | 3 |
3 | Anterior of fissures only slightly inclined sideways, as in Fig. |
Eresus sandaliatus |
– | Anterior of fissures markedly incurvated sideways, as in Fig. |
Eresus kollari |
Males
1 | Terminal tooth of conductor strongly incurvated, hind legs almost entirely red | 2 |
– | Terminal tooth of conductor nearly straight, at most weakly bent, red areas on hind legs not so extensive or entirely absent | 3 |
2 | Conductor with a blunt terminal tooth and a narrow groove, prosoma barely broadens towards front | Eresus hermani sp. n. |
– | Conductor with a pointed terminal tooth and a round groove, prosoma strongly broadens towards front | Eresus moravicus |
3 | Conductor with a strong, long and slightly bent terminal tooth and a U-shaped (in lateral view) groove, hind legs nearly devoid of red setae | Eresus sandaliatus |
– | Conductor with a short, straight terminal tooth and a V-shaped (in lateral view) groove, hind legs with extensive areas of red color | Eresus kollari |
Known from seven localities (Fig.
A–L Scanning electron micrographs of Eresus male palps: A–C Eresus hermani (Sas-hegy, Budapest, Hungary) D–F Eresus moravicus (Örkény-Táborfalva-Tatárszentgyörgy, Hungary) G–I Eresus kollari (Farkas-hegy, Budaörs, Hungary) J–L Eresus sandaliatus (Aulum, Denmark) A, D, G, J ventral B, E, H, K lateral and C, F, I, L apical view; inset in B: a variant of conductor tip with unusually wide groove (Sas-hegy, Budapest, Hungary).
A–L Copulatory organs of Eresus adult females: A–C Eresus hermani (Sas-hegy, Budapest, Hungary) D–F Eresus moravicus (D Misina-hegy, Pécs, Hungary E–F Dürnstein, Austria) G–I Eresus kollari (Farkas-hegy, Budaörs, Hungary) J–L Eresus sandaliatus (near to Tranemose moor Northwest Jutland, Denmark) A, D, G, J epigyna B, E, H, K epigyna* C, F, I, L vulvae* (*: macerated).
A–H Schematic drawings of Eresus female copulatory organs: A–B Eresus hermani (Sas-hegy, Budapest, Hungary) C–D Eresus moravicus (Dürnstein, Austria) E–F Eresus kollari (Farkas-hegy, Hungary) G–H Eresus sandaliatus (near Tranemose moor, Northwest Jutland, Denmark) A, C, E, G epigyna B, D, F, H vulvae.
Edges of a local variety of downy oak scrub woodland (Ceraso mahaleb-Quercetum pubescentis) and the interim zone between calcareous open rocky grasslands (Seselio leucospermi-Festucetum pallentis) and degraded scrubland.
Eresus hermani matures in August-September, wandering males can be found from the end of March to the end of April (inferred copulation period) and females lay eggs in June. This phenology clearly sets Eresus hermani apart from the other Hungarian Eresus species: E. moravicus matures in late spring and mates in early summer, while E. kollari matures in late summer – early autumn, immediately followed by a copulation period in autumn. The phenology of Eresus hermani is essentially the same as that of E. sandaliatus (
Hungary: Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 01.11.2008., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7669); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 02.09.2008., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7670); Remete-hegy, Budapest (3 ♀, 2 ♂, 05.04.2008., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7671); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 1 juv., 18.04.2008., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7672); Farkas-hegy, Budaörs (1 ♀, 22.09.2013., G. Kovács, H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, D. V. Nagy, HNHM Araneae-7673); Farkas-hegy, Budaörs (2 ♂, 14.04.2013., H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7674; Sas-hegy, Budapest (4 ♂, 07.04.2012., A. Rákóczi, HNHM Araneae-7675); Sas-hegy, Budapest (4 ♂, 25.03.2012., A. Rákóczi, HNHM Araneae-7676); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♂, 16.04.2005., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7677; Farkas-hegy, Budaörs (1 ♂, 13.04.2012., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7678); Farkas-hegy, Budaörs (1 ♂, 21.04.2010., J. Bodor, HNHM Araneae-7679); Remete-hegy, Budapest (5 ♀, 16.09.2012., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7680); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 28.09.2008., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7681); Remete-hegy, Budapest (3 ♀, 23.04.2011., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7682); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 31.03.2011., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7683); Sas-hegy, Budapest (6 ♀, 02.10.2013. H. Gyurkovics, A. Rákóczi, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7684); Érd, Fundoklia-völgy (1 ♀, 02.10.2013. G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7685-86); Érd, Fundoklia-völgy, (1 ♀, 02.10.2013., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7687); Várpalota-Inota (2 juv., 06.07.2014., G. Kovács, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7688), Mátyás-hegy, Budapest (5 ♂, 1933, G. Kolosváry, HNHM Araneae-2943).
The caption of this figure says "Female Eresus cinnaberinus", but, in fact, the picture shows a female Eresus hermani sp. n., as is evident from the heavy cover of light setae on the prosoma and the base of chelicerae.
According to captions, fig. 1C–F of this paper depict the genital organs of female Eresus kollari. However, the anterior part of fissures of the epigyna are nearly parallel, epigynal pits are followed by large flat plateaus at the sides of median lobes, anterior copulatory ducts are round and weakly sclerotized, spermathecae strongly lobed, all features that distinguish Eresus hermani sp. n. unambiguously. Additionally, the epigyne shown in fig. 1E is grossly malformed, having supernumerary rudiments of fissures, a kind of abnormality frequent among females raised in captivity. Figure 2D is labeled as female Eresus kollari. Again, this figure shows a female Eresus hermani sp. n., as evidenced by the dense cover of lightly colored setae on the cephalic region and basal segments of chelicerae. The reason for these misidentifications is that at the time of writing, the authors (including the corresponding author of the present paper) considered females of Eresus hermani sp. n. as merely an extreme local variant of Eresus kollari. (Note: by contrast, fig. 2F. indeed shows a female Eresus kollari next to a male of the same species, as can be judged by the sparsely distributed light setae on the prosoma.)
Figure 2. A. of this paper is mislabeled as Eresus kollari, whereas in fact it depicts a female Eresus hermani sp. n. Again, the true identity of the specimen shown in this picture is revealed by the light color of the prosoma and basal chelicerae. The obvious reason for the misidentification is that at the time of the completion of this Atlas, the concept of Eresus hermani sp. n. as a discreet species was not yet formed.
In this paper, figure 6. shows a female Eresus hermani sp. n. mislabeled as Eresus kollari. Heavy cover of the prosoma by lightly colored hairs gives away the identity of the depicted specimen.
We wish to thank Csaba Szinetár, Tamás Szűts, Milan Řezáč, and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable advice on the manuscript. We would like to thank József Mihály (BRC Hungary) for his assistance with light microscopy and Ákos Kukovecz (University of Szeged) for his approval of the use of the scanning electron microscope. We are especially grateful to Jørgen Lissner and Walter Pfliegler for consenting to the use of their photographs in this manuscript. We thank the following colleagues, who generously provided us with specimens and locality data: András Rákóczi, Balázs Somogyi, Dávid Viktor Nagy, Edit Vadkerti, Gergely Ambrus, István Hahn, János Bodor, Krisztina Bleicher, Lilla Lajos, Ferenc Samu, Márton Szabó, Mónika Landy-Gyebnár, Jørgen Lissner, Péter Kovács, Róbert Gallé, László Somay, Tünde Rácz, Walter Pfliegler, Orsolya Szentjobbi and László Dányi (HNHM, Budapest). We are grateful to Jennifer Tusz for correcting the English of our manuscript.
Comparative materials examined
Eresus kollari. Hungary: Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 19.09.2004., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7689); Remete-hegy, Budapest (4 juv., 25.09.2005., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7690); Remete-hegy, Budapest (2 ♂, 1 juv., 17.09.2006., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7691); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 1 juv., 16.09.2007., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7692); Remete-hegy, Budapest (3 ♀, 2 ♂, 03.10.2007., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7693); Remete-hegy, Budapest (4 ♂, 02.09.2008., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7694); Remete-hegy, Budapest (2 ♀, 3 ♂, 28.09.2008., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7695); Kéleshalom (1 ♂, 14.11.2010., H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7696); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 02.04.2011., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7697); Budakalász (3 ♂, 01.09.2011., I. Hahn, L. Somay, HNHM Araneae-7698); Remete-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 09.04.2011., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7699); Győrszentiván-Gönyü, Héricses (1 ♀, 28.11.2012., Cs. Szinetár, HNHM Araneae-7700); Farkas-hegy, Budaörs (2 ♀, 4 ♂, 15.09.2013., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7701); Győrszentiván (1 ♂, 30.09.2013., P. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7702); Sas-hegy, Budapest (3 ♂, 22.09.2010., E. Botos, PPI); Sas-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 16.07.2010., E. Botos, PPI); Sas-hegy, Budapest (1 ♀, 09.10.2010., E. Botos, PPI); Sas-hegy, Budapest (1 ♂, 07.10.1995., K. Bleicher, PPI); Gödöllő (1 ♂, 30.08.2012., G. Ambrus, HNHM Araneae-7703); Belsőbáránd (1 ♂, ?10.2010., Cs. Szinetár, HNHM Araneae-7704); Bugac (2 ♂, 24.09.2007., R. Gallé, HNHM Araneae-7705); Várpalota-Inota (1 ♀, 06.07.2014., G. Kovács, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7706), Ásotthalom (1 ♂, 20.10.2013., D. V. Nagy HNHM Araneae-7725), Mátyás-hegy, Budapest (2 ♂, 1933, G. Kolosváry, HNHM Araneae-2943).
Eresus moravicus. Hungary: Füzér, Castle hill (1 ♀, (juvenile at the time of collection), 07.10.2006., Cs. Szinetár, G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7707); Misina-hegy, Pécs (1 ♂, 22.04.2002., E. Vadkerti, HNHM Araneae-7708); Máriagyűd, Köves-máj (1 ♂, 08.05.2001, E. Vadkerti, HNHM Araneae -7709); Hárskút, Borostyán-hegy (1 ♂, 23.05.2011., L. Lajos, HNHM Araneae-7710); Misina-hegy, Pécs (3 ♂, 01.07.2011., E. Vadkerti, HNHM Araneae-7711); Felsőörs (1 ♂, 19.05.2011., M. Landy-Gyebnár, HNHM Araneae-7712); Cserkút (1 ♂, 26.05.2013., P. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7713); Tatárszentgyörgy (4 ♂, 19.05.2013., H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7714); Tatárszentgyörgy (2 ♀, 1 ♂, 19.05.2013., H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7715); Tatárszentgyörgy (2 juv., 19.05.2013., H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7716); Kelebia-Bácsborista (1 ♀, 1 ♂ (juvenile at the time of collection), 1 juv., 02.10.2011., H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7717); Kelebia-Bácsborista (1 ♂, 30.05.2010., H. Gyurkovics, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7718); Misina-hegy, Pécs (3 ♀, 15.06.2012., G. Kovács, G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7719); Szentgál, Tiszafás (1 ♂, 21.05.2012., M., Szabó, HNHM Araneae-7720); Kelebia-Bácsborista (1 ♂, 1 ♀, 06.06.2010., G. Vári, HNHM Araneae-7721); Kelebia-Bácsborista (1 ♂, 24.05.2010., H. Gyurkovics HNHM Araneae-7723); Kelebia-Bácsborista (2 ♀, 06.06.2010., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7724); Várpalota, Várvölgy (1 ♂, subadult at the time of collecting, 14.11.2014., G. Kovács, HNHM Araneae-7725). Austria: Dürnstein, (1 ♀, 07.06.2012., W. Pfliegler, WPPC).
E. sandaliatus. Denmark: Clasonsborg (1 juv., 12.05.2004, J. Lissner, JLPC); Tranemose moor, Northwest Jutland (1 ♀, 02.10.2006, J. Lissner, JLPC); Heather at Gindeskov Krat, Aulum (1 ♂, 06.08.2004, J. Lissner, JLPC); Heather at Stovbaek Krat near Aulum (1 juv., 08.06.2004, J. Lissner, JLPC); Norlund, north of Hallundbaek Stream (1 ♂, 28.10.2011, J. Lissner, JLPC); near the Danish-German border (1 ♀, 05.08.2006, J. Lissner, JLPC); Vind Hede (1 ♀, 30.09.2008, J. Lissner, JLPC).