Research Article
Print
Research Article
On the validity of Epeorella Ulmer, 1939 (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae) with general considerations on the Heptageniidae of the Sunda Islands
expand article infoMichel Sartori
‡ Musée cantonal de zoologie, Lausanne, Switzerland
Open Access

Abstract

The type material of Epeorella borneonia Ulmer, 1939, the sole species of the genus Epeorella Ulmer, 1939 is reinvestigated and a lectotype (male imago) is designated. Based on several morphological structures, the synonymy with Epeorus Eaton, 1881 (Rhithrogeninae) is rejected. Epeorella stat. prop., known only at the winged stages, belongs to the subfamily Ecdyonurinae, and is a probable endemic of the island of Borneo. The newly erected genus Darthus Webb & McCafferty, 2007, also endemic to Borneo and only known by one species at the nymphal stage, is shown to be a junior subjective synonym of Epeorella. The new combination Epeorella vadora (Webb & McCafferty, 2007) is proposed for the species. The distribution of known heptageniid species from the Sunda Islands is discussed.

Keywords

Epeorella borneonia , Darthus vadorus , Borneo, lectotype, new synonym, new status, new combination

Introduction

In his major work devoted to the Ephemeroptera of the Sunda Islands, Ulmer (1939) described three new genera in the family Heptageniidae. He gave them names which recalled names of those allied genera he assumed were closely related: Compsoneuriella Ulmer, 1939 and Compsoneuria Eaton, 1881; Rhithrogeniella Ulmer, 1939 and Rhithrogena Eaton, 1881; Epeorella Ulmer, 1939 and Epeorus Eaton, 1881.

The Afrotropical genus Notonurus Crass, 1947 was put in synonymy with Compsoneuriella (type species C. thienemanni Ulmer, 1939, known from winged and nymphal stages) by Gillies (1963; 1984), which in turn was put in synonymy with Compsoneuria (Braasch and Soldán 1986b; Webb et al. 2006). Recent studies, however, have shown the three genera constitute monophyletic clades supported by synapomorphies (Sartori 2014b; Vuataz et al. 2013).

The genus Rhithrogeniella (type species Rh. ornata Ulmer, 1939, based on winged stages only) had an enigmatic position for a long time, until another species from Vietnam (Rh. tonkinensis Soldán & Braasch, 1986) was described, with the first reference to the nymphal stage. Based on these descriptions, Wang and McCafferty (2004) indicated that Rhithrogeniella was a synonym of Rhithrogena and Rh. ornata was a species of Rhithrogena; the species Rhithrogeniella tonkinensis was transferred to the genus Ecdyonurus. Recently, the nymph of Rh. ornata was described for the first time, and the generic status of Rhithrogeniella revalidated (Sartori 2014a) as a member of Ecdyonurinae.

The monotypic genus Epeorella (type species E. borneonia Ulmer, 1939, known only from the winged stages) was synonymized with Epeorus (Wang and McCafferty 2004) on the basis of similarities in several characters which will be discussed below.

The family Heptageniidae is now divided into three subfamilies which can be broadly characterized as following (Kluge 1989; Webb and McCafferty 2008):

  • Rhithrogeninae: nymph with a row of setae on the ventral surface of maxillae, with dorsal process of the forefemora projected and narrower than the ventral process, some genera with vestigial paracercus; winged stages with the median depression of the mesothoracic furcasternum convergent anteriorly, and prosternum lacking transverse and longitudinal ridges.

  • Heptageniinae: nymph with a row of setae on the ventral surface of maxillae, with forefemora without a dorsal projection; winged stages with the median depression of the mesothoracic furcasternum convergent anteriorly, and prosternum with distinct transverse and longitudinal ridges.

  • Ecdyonurinae: nymph with scattered setae on the ventral side of maxillae; winged stages with the median depression of the mesothoracic furcasternum parallel sided or divergent anteriorly, and prosternum generally lacking transverse and longitudinal ridges.

This study concludes the re-investigation of Ulmer’s Heptageniidae from Southeast Asia deposited in the Zoologisches Museum of Hamburg University (ZMH) (Sartori 2014a; b; c; d). The type material of Epeorella borneonia Ulmer, 1939 is described, some morphological structures are clarified, the subfamily position is established and a new synonymy is proposed.

Material and methods

The studied material is composed of three pinned specimens. The female imago was rehydrated in a solution of trisodic phosphate 0.35% and then put in alcohol. Pictures were taken with a Visionary Digital Passport II in ZMH, and figs were assembled in Adobe Photoshop CS6.

Results

Epeorella borneonia Ulmer, 1939

Epeorella borneonia: Ulmer 1939: 579 (male and female imago).

Epeorus borneonia: Wang and McCafferty 2004: 21.

Material examined

One male imago, one female imago, one female subimago, all bearing the following labels: 1) Type [typewriting on red label], 2) Borneo, Nanga Serawei, 12–18.11.1924 3) Sammelreise Prof. Dr. H. Winckler, ded. 1924–1925 4) Z.M.H. Hamburg 5) G. Ulmer det. 1942 Vers. 13.9.1927. This last label is confusing, and according to Prof. H. Strümpel (in litt.) it is a probable mistake.

The male imago was wrongly mentioned as holotype by Weidner (1962). This terminology cannot be accepted because the “holotype” has not been designated by Ulmer and cannot be ascertained by the presence of a single specimen (see also Recommendation 73F. Avoidance of assumption of holotype, ICZN 1999).

The male imago is accordingly designated as LECTOTYPE of the species E. borneonia by present designation.

The three specimens have been adequately described by Ulmer (1939). Only significant morphological characters are mentioned here.

Male imago

Anterior margin of the head not protruding anteriorly (Fig. 1); median depression of mesothoracic furcasternum subparallel, not convergent anteriorly (Fig. 3); mesonotum with a transverse suture (Fig. 2); styliger fig strongly convex, penis lobes minute, rounded and closely tight together (Fig. 4), without apparent sclerites or titillators [a complete analysis of the genitalia will be presented later with the help of non-invasive techniques].

Figures 1–6. 

Epeorella borneonia Ulmer, 1939 1 Lectotype male imago in dorsal view 2 Details of the mesonotum with transversal suture (arrow) 3 Detail of the mesothoracic furcasternum depression (arrow) 4 Detail of the genitalia in ventral view 5 Female subimago in lateral view 6 Detail of abdominal ridge (arrows) in dorsal view.

Female imago

Abdominal patterns similar to the male. Extracted eggs from the rehydrated specimen were unfortunately not in a satisfactory state for chorionic structure examination through SEM.

Female subimago

Similar to the female, except abdominal terga VI–VIII (IV–V to a lesser extent) present the remains of a longitudinal ridge (Figs 5–6).

Discussion

The synonymy of Epeorella with Epeorus was proposed by Wang and McCafferty (2004) based on the following assertions: i) male genitalia and forelegs are similar to those in Epeorus; ii) the vestiges associated with adults indicate that the larvae were two-tailed, and iii) the presence of median tubercles on abdominal segments VI–VIII can also be found in some Epeorus species.

The male genitalia greatly vary in shape among Epeorus species (see Webb and McCafferty 2008, figs 150–154) but are never as found in Epeorella; also, the forelegs of Epeorella are missing (see Ulmer 1939, p. 578) and therefore cannot be compared to Epeorus. The statement that, based on the vestigial paracercus, the nymph was two-tailed (hence comparable to Epeorus) is puzzling. “All Heptageniidae have the same vestigial paracercus, which does not allow to distinguish those with two-tailed and three-tailed larvae” (N. Kluge in litt.); the median ridge may be present on some Epeorus species which is true, but the genus Epeorus is absent from most of the Sunda Islands (Edmunds and Polhemus 1990, M. Sartori unpubl. data) as well as the Philippines. It is poorly diversified in Borneo where it is represented by a single species (Epeorus boonsoongi Braasch, 2011) with a large nymph of ca. 15 mm body length, and bifid tergal spines.

The male imago reinvestigated here presents all characteristics of the subfamily Ecdyonurinae, in peculiar the median depression of the mesothoracic furcasternum is not convergent anteriorly. Moreover, the presence of a clear transverse suture on the mesonotum, excludes it from the genus Epeorus. As already suggested by Braasch (2011) the synonymy proposed by Wang and McCafferty (2004) is incorrect and Epeorella is reinstated as Epeorella Ulmer, 1939, stat. prop.

One interesting character of Wang and McCafferty (2004) is the presence of remains of median tubercles visible at least on abdominal terga VI–VIII of the female subimago. It has already been demonstrated that the subimaginal stage may retain some nymphal structures, such as gill sockets (Sartori et al. 2008), which may help to link nymphal and winged stages. The presence of vestigial tubercles on the terga thus indicates that the nymph possesses a median single ridge on the abdomen. Among Ecdyonurinae, two genera are known to hold such structures, Notacanthurus Tshernova 1974 known from East Palaearctic, the Himalaya region and Southeast Asia, and Darthus Webb and McCafferty 2007, only known from Borneo (Figs 78). Male imagos of Notacanthurus possess the anterior margin of the head distinctly produced (Braasch 1986; Webb and McCafferty 2008), and genitalia possess clearly visible apical and lateral sclerites. Darthus is only known from the nymphal stage from the same island as Epeorella. Although distant by ca 500 km, the type locality of Epeorella borneonia and that of Darthus vadorus Webb & McCafferty, 2007 belong to the Dipterocarpaceae forest of lowland altitudes (Sartori et al. 2003). Moreover, the size of the mature nymphs of D. vadorus (5.5–8.5 mm) is compatible with the adult size of E. borneonia (5.0–5.5 mm) knowing that alate stages are generally smaller than mature nymphs. Therefore, it is likely that Darthus represents in fact the nymphal stage of Epeorella, and is considered as a subjective junior synonym of Epeorella syn. n. The species Epeorella vadora comb. n. is retained as a valid species because it exhibits a different colour pattern of the abdomen.

Figures 7–8. 

Epeorella vadora (Webb & McCafferty, 2007), comb. n. 7 Nymph paratype in dorsal view 8 Nymph paratype in lateral view with median abdominal ridge (arrows).

General considerations on the Heptageniidae of the Sunda Islands

The three genera described by Ulmer (1939) have been put in synonymy by different authors but it is now demonstrated that they represent three groups of species deserving generic rank (Sartori 2014a; b, present study). They all belong to the subfamily Ecdyonurinae which is the most diversified in the studied area. Table 1 summarizes our current knowledge about the Heptageniidae of the Sunda Islands.

Table 1.

Current species of the family Heptageniidae known from the Sunda Islands.

Subfamily Genus species Sumatra Java Bali Borneo Lombok Sumbawa Sulawesi Reference
Rhithrogeninae Rhithrogena sumatrana (Ulmer, 1939) X X X Sartori 2014d
Epeorus boonsoongi Braasch, 2011 X Braasch 2011
Heptageniinae Trichogenia nasuta (Ulmer, 1939) X Webb et al. 2006
ulmeri Braasch & Webb, 2006 X X Webb et al. 2006
hubleyi Webb & McCafferty, 2006 X Webb et al. 2006
Ecdyonurinae Afronurus javanicus Ulmer, 1939 X Ulmer 1939
sarawakensis Braasch, 2011 X Braasch 2011
temburongensis Braasch, 2005 X Braasch 2005
webbi Braasch, 2011 X Braasch 2011
Asionurus ulmeri Braasch & Soldán, 1986 X X Braasch and Soldán 1986a
Atopopus edmundsi Wang & McCafferty, 1995 X Wang and McCafferty 1995
tarsalis Eaton, 1881 X Sartori et al. 2007
Compsoneuria lieftincki (Ulmer, 1939) X Sartori 2014b
spectabilis Eaton, 1881 X X Sartori 2014b
sp. X Sartori 2014b
Compsoneuriella thienemanni Ulmer, 1939 X X Sartori 2014b
sp. X Sartori 2014b
Epeorella borneonia Ulmer, 1939 X Present study
vadora (Webb & McCafferty, 2007) X Present study
Rhithrogeniella ornata Ulmer, 1939 X X Sartori 2014a
Thalerosphyrus determinatus (Walker, 1853) X X X Sartori 2014c
lamuriensis Sartori, 2014 X Sartori 2014c
sinuosus (Navás, 1933) X X Sartori 2014c
sp. X Braasch 2011, Sartori 2014c
9 9 1 10 1 1 3

The Rhithrogeninae are known by only two species belonging to two widespread and speciose genera: Rhithrogena with more than 150 species and Epeorus with almost 100 species. Although mainly Holarctic, these two genera are present in the Oriental Region with 12 and 32 species respectively. The genus Epeorus is well represented in Indochina, where at least 13 species are known, but was unknown from the Sunda Islands until Braasch (2011) described E. boonsoongi from Borneo. The genus is not recorded from Java, Sumatra and other Sunda Islands despite numerous samples over the last century. Rhithrogena exhibits an opposite trend in its distribution, being known from Sumatra, Java, Lombok, and possibly Bali, but seems to be absent from Borneo.

The only genus of the subfamily Heptageniinae present on the Sunda Islands is Trichogenia Braasch & Soldán, 1988, a Southeast Asian genus with one species in Sulawesi, T. hubleyi Webb & McCafferty, 2006 and two species in Sumatra, T. nasuta (Ulmer, 1939) and T. ulmeri Braasch & Webb, 2006, the latter also recorded from Borneo (Webb et al. 2006). There is a reasonable probability that T. ulmeri, known only at the nymphal stage, is a junior synonym of T. nasuta, known only at the winged stages, the distance between both type localities being less than 100 kilometres.

The subfamily Ecdyonurinae includes four times as many species as the two previous subfamilies combined. This is not surprising since Ecdyonurinae nymphs are among those which can tolerate slow flowing waters and high water temperatures; they have movable gills which is also an advantage when oxygen concentration is not optimal. The only two genera found in tropical Africa (Afronurus and Notonurus) also belong to the Ecdyonurinae. The genus Afronurus is the most diversified in the Oriental Region with 45 described species, but most of them are poorly known or badly described. It is probable that the concept of Afronurus in the Orient is paraphyletic; nevertheless, the genus seems present mainly on Borneo with three species; the species Afronurus javanicus Ulmer, 1939, is only known by adults collected on Java, which fit the current concept of Afronurus (M. Sartori, unpub. data). The genus is not reported from Sumatra, or Sulawesi, but seems present on Sumbawa and Sumba (M. Balke coll.). The two genera Atopopus and Epeorella are only found on Borneo, the former extending its range to the Philippines with two described species. The genera Asionurus and Rhithrogeniella have a distribution restricted to Indochina, extending to Java and Sumatra only. Finally Sulawesi is the most eastern island to have been colonized by Heptageniidae with Compsoneuria, Compsoneuriella and an undescribed genus (M. Sartori unpubl. data, M. Balke coll.). The family is not recorded from Moluccas, as well as Papua New Guinea, where the families Baetidae, Leptophlebiidae and Caenidae are eudominant.

More studies are needed, especially molecular phylogenies, to infer the timing and patterns of distribution of the genera and species in the area, particularly the relative importance of vicariance processes and dispersal events since the Miocene (Lohman et al. 2011).

Acknowledgements

My sincere thanks to Kai Schütte and Hossein Rajaei (ZMH) for allowing me to study Ulmer’s collection in Hamburg, Prof. Hans Strümpel (ZMH) for his advices, and Nikita Kluge (St-Petersburg) for exchanging morphological considerations. Discussions with Jean-Luc Gattolliat (MZL) and comments by two anonymous reviewers helped to improve this paper. Michael Balke (Munich) is warmly thanked for placing his Indonesian collections at my disposal.

References

  • Braasch D (1986) Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Notacanthurus Tshernova, 1974 aus dem Himalaya (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae). Reichenbachia Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde in Dresden 23: 117–125.
  • Braasch D (2005) Neue Arten der Gattung Atopopus und Afronurus aus Südostasien sowie einige Bemerkungen zur Gattung Asionurus von Malaysia (Insecta: Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Entomologische Abhandlungen 62: 165–174.
  • Braasch D (2011) New species of the family Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera) from Borneo and the Philippines. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 58: 201–219. doi: 10.1002/mmnd.201100024
  • Braasch D, Soldán T (1986a) Asionurus n. gen., eine neue Gattung der Heptageniidae von Vietnam (Ephemeroptera). Reichenbachia Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde in Dresden 23: 155–159.
  • Braasch D, Soldán T (1986b) Die Heptageniidae des Gombak River in Malaysia (Ephemeroptera). Reichenbachia Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde in Dresden 24: 41–52.
  • Braasch D, Soldán T (1988) Trichogenia gen. n., eine neue Gattung der Eintagsfliegen aus Vietnam (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae). Reichenbachia Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde in Dresden 25: 119–124.
  • Crass RS (1947) Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) collected by J. Omer-Cooper in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, with a description of a new genus and species (Notonurus cooperi).12: 124–128.
  • Eaton AE (1881) An announcement of new genera of the Ephemeridae (continued). Entomologist Monthly Magazine 18: 21–27.
  • Edmunds GF, Polhemus DA (1990) Zoogeographical patterns among mayflies (Ephemeroptera) in the Malay Archipelago, with special reference to Celebes. In: Knight WJ, Holloway JD (Eds) Insects and the rain forests of South East Asia (Wallacea). The Royal Entomological Society of London, London, 49–56.
  • Gillies MT (1963) A list of Ephemeroptera in the National Museum, Bulawayo, Southern Rhodesia. The Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 98: 232–233.
  • Gillies MT (1984) On the synonymy of Notonurus Crass with Compsoneuriella Ulmer (Heptageniidae). In: Landa V, Soldán T, Tonner M (Eds) Proceeding of the fourth international conference on Ephemeroptera. CSAV, Bechyne, 21–25.
  • ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The international trust for zoological nomenclature, London, 306 pp.
  • Kluge NJ (1989) Generic revision of the Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera): I. Diagnosis of tribes, genera and subgenera of the subfamily Heptageniinae. Entomological Review, 24 pp.
  • Lohman DJ, de Bruyn M, Page T, von Rintelen K, Hall R, Ng PKL, Shih H-T, Carvalho GR, von Rintelen T (2011) Biogeography of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 42: 205–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145001
  • Sartori M (2014a) About the status of the enigmatic Oriental genus Rhithrogeniella Ulmer, 1939 (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae). Zookeys 429: 47–61. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.429.8116
  • Sartori M (2014b) The concept of Compsoneuria Eaton, 1881 revisited in light of historical and new material from the Sunda Islands (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae, Ecdyonurinae). Zootaxa 3835: 1–32. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3835.1.1
  • Sartori M (2014c) The species of Thalerosphyrus Eaton, 1881 (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae, Ecdyonurinae) in Java and Sumatra, with some comments on the diversity of the genus in the Oriental Realm. Zookeys 420: 19–39. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.420.7904
  • Sartori M (2014d) What is Ecdyonurus sumatranus Ulmer, 1939? A contribution to the knowledge of the genus Rhithrogena in the Oriental Region (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae). Zootaxa 3802: 193–208. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3802.2.3
  • Sartori M, Derleth P, Gattolliat JL (2003) New data about the mayflies (Ephemeroptera) from Borneo. In: Gaino E (Ed.) Research Update on Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera. University of Perugia, Italy, Perugia, 403–406.
  • Sartori M, Derleth P, Webb JM (2007) The nymph of Atopopus tarsalis Eaton, 1881 (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae): first description, ecology and behaviour. Zootaxa 1586: 25–32.
  • Sartori M, Peters JG, Hubbard MD (2008) A revision of Oriental Teloganodidae (Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Ephemerelloidea). Zootaxa 1957: 1–51.
  • Soldán T, Braasch D (1986) Rhithrogeniella tonkinensis sp.n. (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae) from Vietnam, with descriptions of the nymphal stages and biology of the genus. Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 83: 202–212.
  • Tshernova OA (1974) The generic composition of the mayflies of the family Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera) in the Holarctic and Oriental Region. Revue d’Entomologie de l’URSS 53: 801–814.
  • Ulmer G (1939) Eintagsfliegen (Ephemeropteren) von den Sunda-Inseln. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 16: 443–692.
  • Vuataz L, Sartori M, Gattolliat JL, Monaghan MT (2013) Endemism and diversification in freshwater insects of Madagascar revealed by coalescent and phylogenetic analysis of museum and field collections. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66: 979–991. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.12.003
  • Wang T-Q, McCafferty WP (1995) First larval descriptions, new species and evaluation, of the Southeast Asian genus Atopopus (Ephemeroptera, Heptageniidae). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 131: 19–25.
  • Wang T-Q, McCafferty WP (2004) Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera) of the world. Part I: Phylogenetic higher classification. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 130: 11–45.
  • Webb JM, Braasch D, McCafferty WP (2006) Reevaluation of the genera Compsoneuria Eaton and Trichogenia Braasch & Soldán (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Zootaxa 1335: 55–68.
  • Webb JM, McCafferty WP (2007) A new genus and species of Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera) from Borneo, with revisions to the classification of the Ecdyonurinae. Zootaxa 1478: 41–47.
  • Weidner H (1962) Die entomologische Sammlungen des zoologischen Staatsinstituts und zoologischen Museums Hamburg. Insecta I. Mitteilungen der hamburger zoologischer Museum und Institut 60: 81–109.
login to comment