ZooKeys 222: 11–45, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.222.3375
Review of the species level taxonomy of the neotropical butterfly genus Oenomaus (Lycaenidae,  Theclinae,  Eumaeini)
Christophe Faynel 1,†, Robert C. Busby 2,‡, Robert K. Robbins 3,§
1 16 rue des Aspres, F-34160 Montaud, France
2 7 Countryside Way, Andover, MA 01810-6041 USA
3  Department of Entomology, PO Box 37012, NHB Stop 105, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012 USA

Corresponding author: Christophe Faynel (christophe.faynel@wanadoo.fr)

Academic editor: Carlos Peña

received 11 May 2012 | accepted 28 August 2012 | Published 20 September 2012


(C) 2012 Christophe Faynel. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Abstract

Seven new species of the Neotropical hairstreak genus Oenomaus are described: Oenomaus mancha Busby & Faynel, sp. n. (type locality Ecuador); Oenomaus gwenish Robbins & Faynel, sp. n. (type locality Panama); Oenomaus lea Faynel & Robbins, sp. n. (type locality Ecuador); Oenomaus myrteana Busby, Robbins & Faynel, sp. n. (type locality Ecuador); Oenomaus mentirosa Faynel & Robbins, sp. n. (type locality Peru); Oenomaus andi Busby & Faynel, sp. n. (type locality Ecuador) and Oenomaus moseri Robbins & Faynel, sp. n. (type locality Brazil, Santa Catarina). For each new Oenomaus species, we present diagnostic characters and notes on its habitat and biology. We illustrate adults, genitalia, and distribution. New distributional and biological data are presented for 21 previously described Oenomaus species. Oenomaus melleus guyanensis Faynel, 2008 is treated as a new synonym of Oenomaus melleus melleus (Druce, 1907). Females are described and associated with males for ten species using a variety of factors, including mitochondrial COI DNA “barcode” sequences. We summarize the reasons why the number of recognized Oenomaus species has grown in the past decade from one species to 28 species. Finally, we overview the habitats that Oenomaus species occupy and note that the agricultural pest on Annonaceae, Oenomaus ortygnus, is the only Oenomaus species that regularly occurs in greatly disturbed habitats.

Résumé

Sept nouvelles espèces appartenant au genre néotropical Oenomaus Hübner sont décrites : Oenomaus mancha Busby & Faynel, sp. n. (localité type : Equateur); Oenomaus gwenish Robbins & Faynel, sp. n. (localité type : Panama); Oenomaus lea Faynel & Robbins, sp. n. (localité type : Equateur); Oenomaus myrteana Busby, Robbins & Faynel, sp. n. (localité type : Equateur); Oenomaus mentirosa Faynel & Robbins, sp. n. (localité type : Pérou); Oenomaus andi Busby et Faynel, sp. n. (localité type : Equateur) et Oenomaus moseri Robbins & Faynel, sp. n. (localité type : Brésil, Santa Catarina). Pour chaque nouvelle espèce, les caractères diagnostiques sont présentés et sont accompagnés de remarques sur l’habitat et la biologie. Les faces dorsales et ventrales des adultes et les organes génitaux sont illustrés et des cartes de répartition sont données. Dans une deuxième partie, de nouvelles données sont présentées pour 21 espèces d’Oenomaus précédemment décrites. Oenomaus melleus guyanensis Faynel, 2008 est mis en synonymie avec Oenomaus melleus melleus (Druce, 1907). Les femelles sont décrites et associées avec des mâles en utilisant plusieurs moyens, y compris les séquences d’ADN mitochondrial COI. Les raisons pour lesquelles le nombre d’espèces d’Oenomaus décrites a fortement augmenté ces dernières années sont évoquées. Finalement, une vue d’ensemble des habitats occupés par les différentes espèces d’Oenomaus est présentée. Oenomaus ortygnus, qui est un parasite agricole connu sur Annonaceae, est la seule espèce d’Oenomaus qui se trouve régulièrement dans des habitats perturbés.

Keywords

Annonaceae, Neotropics, Porthecla

Introduction

The widespread Neotropical hairstreak Oenomaus ortygnus (Cramer) is a pest of cultivated soursop (Annona muricata L.) and relatives (Annonaceae), and aspects of its biology have been documented for nearly a century (e.g., Dampf 1929; Fennah 1937; Ballou 1945; Guagliumi 1965, 1967; Araque 1967; d’Araújo e Silva et al. 1967–1968; Leal 1970; Kendall 1975; Domínguez 1978; Peña et al. 2002; Castañeda-Vildózola et al. 2011). In contrast, the taxonomy of the genus Oenomaus Hübner (Lycaenidae: Theclinae) was not addressed until recently. Oenomaus was considered to be a monotypic genus of uncertain affinity (Clench 1964) until Robbins (2004) listed 22 Neotropical species (18 undescribed). Shortly thereafter, Faynel (2006, 2008) and Faynel and Moser (2008) documented the substantive variation of male genitalic structures in Oenomaus and described 12 new species from male holotypes. However, associating females with the males was problematic for many of these species.

A close phylogenetic relationship between Oenomaus and Porthecla Robbins was suggested when Robbins and Duarte (2004) described the latter genus. However, the distinction between these two generahas been disputed because of different interpretations of male genitalic morphology, which has resulted in the uncertain generic placement for a few species (Faynel 2007; Faynel et al. 2011). The species level taxonomy of Porthecla has been treated (Faynel et al. 2011), but a similar overview for Oenomaus is lacking.

We present new species level taxonomic information for Oenomaus in this paper. We describe seven new Oenomaus species. Next, we update information on the distribution, habitat, variation, and biology of the 21 species that were previously described in or transferred to Oenomaus (Robbins 2004; Faynel 2007; Faynel et al. 2011). We also associate females with males for many species based on male-female pairs collected in copula or on similarity of ventral wing patterns, geographic distribution, and DNA ‘barcode’ sequences (the mitochondrial COI gene). The morphology of newly associated females is detailed. With the species level taxonomy of Porthecla recently reviewed (Faynel et al. 2011), the goal of this paper is do the same kind of review for Oenomaus. This information will serve as the foundation for a phylogenetic analysis of Oenomaus and Porthecla.

Materials and methods

Genitalic terms follow those in Klots (1970), as modified for the Eumaeini in Robbins (1991). Wing veins are named following Comstock (1918), and wing cells are named by the veins that border them. Otherwise, morphological terms follow Snodgrass (1935). Abbreviations used repeatedly in the text are FW: forewing, HW: hindwing, D: dorsal, V: ventral and SD: standard deviation. Brazilian states are noted by their standard two letter abbreviations.

Illustrated adults of Oenomaus are noted in the material examined sections, and each genitalia drawing is of the adult illustrated. The structure of the male genitalia valvae in Oenomaus is complex, for which reason we present them in ventral, lateral, and dorsal views.

Biogeographical zones follow Brown (1982), who partitioned the forested continental Neotropics into the Transandean Region, Andean Region, Amazon Region, and Atlantic Region. Larval food plant nomenclature follows the Tropicos database of the Missouri Botanical Garden (http://www.Tropicos.org, accessed April 2012). Following Holdridge (1967), we classify lowland forests as humid/wet (> 200 cm annual precipitation) or dry/deciduous (100–200 cm annual precipitation). Many eumaeines display male territorial behavior on hilltops (Nicolay 1971; Alcock and O’Neill 1987; Prieto and Dahners 2006, 2009; Robbins et al. 2012). Males wait on hilltops for receptive females to fly through the territory and “defend” these areas by flying at other males that enter the territory. Recorded times from our fieldwork for hilltopping behavior are the standard time at that locality. Finally, traps baited with decaying fish attract some lycaenid species and not others. We note the gender for each species which has been collected using fish-baited traps.

The ventral wing pattern in Oenomaus is sexually monomorphic, so associating the sexes of species with distinct ventral wing patterns, such as Oenomaus ortygnus, is straightforward. However, a majority of Oenomaus species have a ventral wing pattern that is similar to that of Oenomaus atena (Hewitson). Among these, some can be associated because they have distinct ventral wing pattern elements, such as those of Oenomaus isabellae (Faynel 2008), or because a mating pair was collected in copula. In other cases, we associate females with males if at least three of the following four criteria are met: (1) females have a ventral wing pattern that is indistinguishable from that of males, (2) females have a geographic distribution that is similar to that of males, (3) both sexes are found in a locality where other species with the same wing pattern are unrecorded, and (4) divergence of DNA “barcode” sequences between the sexes is less than 2% (see next paragraph).

The mitochondrial COI gene sequence (commonly called a DNA “barcode”) has been useful, when combined with other characters, in distinguishing lepidopteran species in a single area (e.g., Hebert et al. 2004; Hajibabaei et al. 2006; Janzen et al. 2009). Because genitalic and wing pattern characters generally provide clear species boundaries in Oenomaus, our purpose in determining COI gene sequences was to aid in associating females with males, as noted.

We use the following acronyms for collections, following those for public institutions listed on the website hbs.bishopmuseum.org/codens/codens-inst.html (accessed April 2012):

AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.

ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

CF Private collection of Christophe Faynel, France.

CMNH Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

DZUP Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

FSMC Florida Museum of Natural History, Allyn Museum, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

JFLC Private collection of Jean François Le Crom, Bogotá, Colombia.

LYD Private collection of Louis and Yvan Diringer, France.

MC Private collection of Alfred Moser, São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

MNHN Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.

MUSM Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Perú.

OSAC Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

PB Private collection of Pierre Boyer, Le Puy Sainte Réparade, France.

RCB Private collection of Robert C. Busby, Andover, Massachusetts, USA.

SMF Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany.

USNM Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC USA.

New species

A distinguishing trait of Oenomaus and Porthecla among members of the Panthiades Section of the Eumaeini is the lack of an orange cubital spot (Robbins and Duarte 2004, Faynel et al. 2011). Of the seven new species described in this paper, six lack the spot while some specimens of the seventh species may have a vestigial remnant composed of a few orange scales (Figs 1–11). Oenomaus and Porthecla are distinguished from each other by shape of the valvae in lateral aspect, but interpretation of this morphology has varied for some species (Robbins and Duarte 2004, Faynel 2007, Faynel et al. 2011). However, six of the newly described species have non-triangular, bifurcate valvae in lateral aspect (Figs 20–25), which is characteristic of Oenomaus. The seventh species is known only from a female, but the similarities in its wing pattern (Figs 2–3) and genitalia (Figs 28–29) to two other Oenomaus species support its generic placement. For these reasons, the following new species are described in Oenomaus.

Type-locality.

Ecuador: Sucumbíos, 5 km Puerto Libre-La Bonita Road, 0°13.0'N, 77°29.3'W, 700 m. The road going west from Puerto Libre increases in elevation as the terrain becomes hillier. The collecting spot was in wet forest and was easily accessed by a muddy logging trail. Since 2005, logging has continued, leaving very few tall trees in the once beautiful forest.

Type-specimen.

Holotype ♂ (Fig. 1) labeled as “ECUADOR: Sucumbios / 5 km Puerto Libre-La Bonita Road / 0°13.0'N, 77°29.3'W, 700 m / 23 February 2005 / Robert C. Busby, leg.” [rectangular, white, printed], “11:00 hrs / 5 m” [rectangular, white, handwritten, blue ink], “GENITALIA No. / 2011: 419♂ / C. FAYNEL” [rectangular, green, printed] “Holotype ♂ / Oenomaus mancha / Busby & Faynel, 2012” [rectangular, red, printed]. Deposited in USNM.

Paratypes: Ecuador. 2 ♂: Napo, 14 km Tena-Puyo Road, 1°06.7'S, 77°46.9' W, 600 m, 24.IX.2011, (Apuya) Robert C. Busby leg. (RCB); Napo, Pimpilala, [ GPS data : 1°04.6 S, 77°56.2'W ], 600–700 m, Euclides Aldaz leg., XII.2003, gen. prep. CF n°290 (PB); 10♀: Napo, 28 km Tena-Puyo Road, 1°11.3'S, 77°49.9'W, 800 m, VIII.2006 (El Capricho) I. Aldas & R. C. Busby leg. (RCB); Napo, 12 km Tena-Puyo Road, 1°05.3'S, 77°47.4' W, 600 m, 28.VIII.2009, (Finca San Carlo) D. H. Ahrenholz, R. C. Busby, leg. (RCB); Napo, 14 km Tena-Puyo Road, 1°06.7'S, 77°46.9'W 600 m, VIII.2005, (Apuya) I. Aldas & R. C. Busby leg. (RCB) ; Napo, 14 km Tena-Puyo Road, 1°06.7'S, 77°46.9'W, 600 m, 17.X.2010, (Apuya) I. Aldas & R. C. Busby leg. (RCB); Napo, 14 km Tena-Puyo Road, 1°06.7'S, 77°46.9'W, 600 m, 22.X.2010, (Apuya) I. Aldas & R. C. Busby leg. (RCB); Pastaza Province, 32 km S. of Puyo, 1000 m, 21–23.X.1995 Robert C. Busby leg. (RCB); Pastaza Province, 45 km Puyo-Arajuno Rd, 1000 m, 15.IX.1999, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°420 (RCB); Pastaza Province, 45 km Puyo-Arajuno Rd, 1000 m, 26.IX.1999, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°421 (RCB); Pastaza Province, 45 km Puyo-Arajuno Rd, 1000 m, 26.IX.1999, Robert C. Busby leg. (RCB); Pastaza, Puyo, 1000 m, 14.X.1989, D.H. Ahrenholz leg., gen. prep. CF n°407 (USNM ENT 00180037) (Fig. 2).

Figures 1–11.

Oenomaus, new species: adults (dorsal surface at left, ventral surface at right). 1Oenomaus mancha (holotype, Ecuador) 2Oenomaus mancha (paratype, Ecuador) 3Oenomaus gwenish (holotype, Panama)  ♂ Oenomaus lea (holotype, Peru) 5Oenomaus myrteana (holotype, Ecuador) 6Oenomaus myrteana (paratype, Ecuador) 7Oenomaus mentirosa (holotype, Peru) 8Oenomaus andi (holotype, Ecuador) 9Oenomaus andi (paratype, Ecuador) 10Oenomaus moseri (holotype, Brazil) 11Oenomaus moseri (paratype, Brazil).

Description, diagnosis and recognition as a distinct species.

Male FW length: 20.8 mm (SD = 1.9, N = 2). Female FW length: 19.4 mm (SD = 0.5, N = 3). Wing pattern (Figs 1, 2) and genitalia (Figs 20, 26) illustrated. Oenomaus mancha, Oenomaus ortygnus, and Oenomaus gwenish (named below) share a unique ventral wing pattern in which the VFW postmedian line (displaced basally, but by tradition still called the postmedian line) is composed of “disjointed” large black spots on a gray ground color (Fig. 3 for Oenomaus gwenish and Figs 2, 4 for Oenomaus ortygnus in Faynel 2006). Oenomaus mancha differs from Oenomaus ortygnusby (1) a black patch in the distal part of the VHW cell Sc+R1-Rs, elongated basally, (2) no black mark in VFW cell Costa-Sc, and (3) a black band crossing the VFW discal cell. In addition, females of Oenomaus mancha are a brighter blue dorsally, while the blue on the DFW of males is somewhat less expansive with the scent pad not completely encircled by blue scales as in Oenomaus ortygnus. Male and female genitalia of Oenomaus mancha and Oenomaus ortygnus also differ (Figs 25, 28 for Oenomaus ortygnus in Faynel 2006). In particular, the dorsal part of the valvae of the male genitalia in lateral aspect is shorter and has a more sharply tapered posterior end in ventral view. In the female, the bifid posterior end of the lamella postvaginalis is less marked and the anterior end of the ductus bursae is curved more sharply. One paratype from Ecuador has been barcoded (CF-LYC-190), and its sequence is 3.5% divergent from the sequences of two males of Oenomaus ortygnus (CF-LYC-147 from Peru and CF-LYC-146 from Mexico, see Table 1) while the two Oenomaus ortygnus sequences differ by only 1.5%. Oenomaus ortygnus and Oenomaus mancha are sympatric in eastern Ecuador in Napo Province at approximately 450 m.

Figures 12–19.

Oenomaus, newly associated females: adults (dorsal surface at left, ventral surface at right). 12 Oenomaus geba (Brazil) 13 Oenomaus magnus (French Guiana) 14 Oenomaus brulei (French Guiana) 15 Oenomaus gaia (Panama) 16 Oenomaus cyanovenata (Costa Rica) 17 Oenomaus cyanovenata (French Guiana) 18 Oenomaus taua (Panama) 19 Oenomaus taua (Ecuador).

Figures 20–25.

Oenomaus male genitalia: ventral view at left (setae drawn only on the right side and penis removed), left lateral view in the middle (with the penis and valvae displaced ~45° to make them more visible), and dorsal view at right (with setae drawn only on the right side and penis removed). 20  Oenomaus mancha (holotype, Ecuador) 21 Oenomaus lea (holotype, Peru) 22 Oenomaus myrteana (holotype, Ecuador) 23 Oenomaus mentirosa (holotype, Peru) 24 Oenomaus andi (holotype, Ecuador) 25 Oenomaus moseri (holotype, Brazil).

Figures 26–37.

Oenomaus female genitalia: ventral view at left, lateral view on right. 26 Oenomaus mancha (paratype, Ecuador) 27 Oenomaus gwenish (holotype, Panama) 28 Oenomaus myrteana (paratype, Ecuador) 29 Oenomaus andi (paratype, Ecuador) 30 Oenomaus moseri (paratype, Brazil) 31 Oenomaus brulei (French Guiana) 32 Oenomaus cyanovenata (French Guiana) 33 Oenomaus cyanovenata (Costa Rica) 34 Oenomaus gaia (Panama) 35 Oenomaus geba (Brazil) 36 Oenomaus magnus (French Guiana) 37 Oenomaus taua (Panama).

Table 1.

Comparison of inter- and intraspecific divergences (in % rounded to the nearest tenth) for the DNA “barcodes” of 19 Oenomaus male species obtained with BOLD (noted as -- when not available). Number of males examined in brackets.

Oenomaus ambiguus Oenomaus atena Oenomaus atesa Oenomaus brulei Oenomaus cortica Oenomaus curiosa Oenomaus cyanovenata Oenomaus gaia Oenomaus isabellae Oenomaus jauffreti Oenomaus lea Oenomaus magnus Oenomaus mancha Oenomaus morroensis Oenomaus moseri Oenomaus nigra Oenomaus ortygnus Oenomaus poirieri Oenomaus taua
Oenomaus ambiguus (3) 0.2
Oenomaus atena (1) 6.9 --
Oenomaus atesa (1) 7.2 7.0 --
Oenomaus brulei (2) 6.2 6.2 7.4 0.3
Oenomaus cortica (3) 2.8 5.5 7.5 5.9 0.5
Oenomaus curiosa (4) 7.9 6.5 5.3 6.9 7.4 0.6
Oenomaus cyanovenata (4) 7.1 5.4 7.2 7.3 5.8 6.4 0
Oenomaus gaia (3) 2.4 5.3 7.0 5.6 1.0 7.2 5.9 0.7
Oenomaus isabellae (1) 6.2 6.7 7.6 7.3 5.8 7.9 6.1 5.6 --
Oenomaus jauffreti (4) 7.0 6.5 7.0 6.2 6.4 7.6 6.9 6.1 4.9 1.6
Oenomaus lea (1) 6.9 4.7 6.7 6.3 6.1 6.2 5.9 5.9 7.3 5.8 --
Oenomaus magnus (1) 7.9 6.9 7.6 7.6 7.0 7.5 6.9 6.8 4.5 5.9 7.7 --
Oenomaus mancha (1) 5.2 5.2 5.7 5.7 4.9 5.9 5.6 4.3 4.9 5.4 5.6 6.4 --
Oenomaus morroensis (1) 2.3 4.8 7.1 4.8 0.9 7.1 5.4 0.9 5.7 6.3 5.7 6.8 5 --
Oenomaus moseri (2) 5.7 5.9 6.7 6.9 5.7 6.9 4.0 5.2 5.6 5.8 5.8 6.6 4.9 5.1 0
Oenomaus nigra (1) 7.7 6.7 5.7 8.4 7.8 5.9 7.6 7.2 7.8 6.9 5.9 7.2 6.4 7.7 7 --
Oenomaus ortygnus (2) 6.7 5.7 6.6 7.1 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.2 3.5 6.2 5.4 6.6 1.5
Oenomaus poirieri (1) 7.7 6.9 7.5 7.2 7.5 8.0 6.6 7.0 5.2 4.6 7.5 6.2 6.1 6.9 5.3 7.6 6.2 --
Oenomaus taua (2) 5.9 5.2 5.4 6.1 5.3 6.0 5.1 4.9 5.2 4.7 4.3 5.9 4.1 5.4 4.8 6.1 4.9 5.6 0
Table 2.

Species of Oenomaus sampled with BOLD (project NLYCA), with sample identifications, localities and GenBank accession numbers.

Species Sample ID Locality GenBank Accession Numbers
Oenomaus ambiguus Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-025 Peru HQ966548
Oenomaus ambiguus Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-183 Peru JX458731
Oenomaus ambiguus Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-189 Peru JX458734
Oenomaus atena (Hewitson, 1867) CF-LYC-084 Peru HQ966592
Oenomaus atesa (Hewitson, 1867) CF-LYC-003 French Guiana HQ966543
Oenomaus brulei Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-033 French Guiana HQ966552
Oenomaus brulei Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-035 French Guiana HQ966554
Oenomaus cortica (D'Abrera, 1995) CF-LYC-051 Brazil HQ966565
Oenomaus cortica (D'Abrera, 1995) CF-LYC-052 Brazil HQ966566
Oenomaus cortica (D'Abrera, 1995) CF-LYC-188 Peru JX458722
Oenomaus curiosa Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-036 French Guiana HQ966555
Oenomaus curiosa Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-037 French Guiana HQ966556
Oenomaus curiosa Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-016 Peru JX458726
Oenomaus curiosa Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-184 Peru JX458730
Oenomaus cyanovenata (D'Abrera, 1995) CF-LYC-049 Brazil HQ966564
Oenomaus cyanovenata (D'Abrera, 1995) CF-LYC-048 Brazil HQ966563
Oenomaus cyanovenata (D'Abrera, 1995) CF-LYC-047 French Guiana JX458737
Oenomaus cyanovenata (D'Abrera, 1995) CF-LYC-182 Peru JX458728
Oenomaus gaia Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-024 Peru JX458720
Oenomaus gaia Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-023 French Guiana JX458719
Oenomaus gaia Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-187 Peru JX458721
Oenomaus isabellae Faynel, 2006 CF-LYC-006 Brazil HQ966545
Oenomaus jauffreti Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-030 Brazil JX458724
Oenomaus jauffreti Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-029 French Guiana HQ966549
Oenomaus jauffreti Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-028 Brazil JX458727
Oenomaus jauffreti Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-186 Peru JX458732
Oenomaus lea Faynel & Robbins, 2012 CF-LYC-005 Peru HQ966544
Oenomaus magnus Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-020 Peru HQ966547
Oenomaus mancha Busby & Faynel, 2012 CF-LYC-190 Ecuador JX458723
Oenomaus morroensis Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-015 Brazil JX458736
Oenomaus moseri Robbins & Faynel, 2012 CF-LYC-012 Brazil JX458735
Oenomaus moseri Robbins & Faynel, 2012 CF-LYC-063 Brazil HQ966576
Oenomaus nigra Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-148 Peru JX458729
Oenomaus ortygnus (Cramer, 1779) CF-LYC-146 Mexico JX458738
Oenomaus ortygnus (Cramer, 1779) CF-LYC-147 Peru JX458733
Oenomaus poirieri Faynel, 2008 CF-LYC-011 French Guiana JX458725
Oenomaus taua Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-085 Peru HQ966593
Oenomaus taua Faynel & Moser, 2008 CF-LYC-185 Peru JX458739
Etymology.

The name of this species is derived from the Spanish word “mancha”, which means spot, referring to the very distinctive, elongated black spot in VHW cell Sc+R1-Rs. The name is a feminine noun in apposition.

Habitat and distribution.

Oenomaus mancha occurs widely in wet forest in eastern Ecuador at elevations ranging from 400 to 1100 m (Fig. 46). Although it is sympatric with Oenomaus ortygnus in wet forest, it does not occur in the highly disturbed habitats in which Oenomaus ortygnus sometimes occurs. It is yet an open question whether Oenomaus mancha is a lowland or lower montane species.

Figures 38–45.

Oenomaus, eighth abdominal tergum: ventral view, anterior edge at bottom. 38Oenomaus mancha (holotype, Ecuador) 39Oenomaus lea (holotype, Peru) 40Oenomaus mentirosa (holotype, Peru) 41Oenomaus myrteana (holotype, Ecuador) 42Oenomaus andi (holotype, Ecuador) 43Oenomaus andi (paratype, Ecuador) 44Oenomaus moseri (holotype, Brazil) 45 Male genitalia in lateral view: Oenomaus moseri (left) and Oenomaus morroensis holotypes. Diagnostic characters (1), (2) and (3) are explained in the text.

Figures 46–47.

Distributions. 46 Oenomaus mancha, Oenomaus gwenish, Oenomaus myrteana, Oenomaus moseri 47 Oenomaus andi, Oenomaus lea, Oenomaus mentirosa.

Behavior.

The holotype male was landed on a leaf about 5 m above the ground at 11:00 hours. Males and females are attracted to traps baited with rotting fish (vouchers in RCB).

Type-locality.

Panama: Darién, Serranía de Pirre, Cana, 7°55'57"N, 77°42'58"W, 1000 m. Serranía de Pirre at 1000 m was uncut wet lower montane forest in 1984. The only disturbance was a defunct gold mine camp and associated dirt runway at Cana.

Type-specimen.

Holotype ♀ (Fig. 3) labeled as “PANAMA: Darien: / Serrania de Pirre: / Cana: 1, 000 m / 5 January 1984 / Leg. G.B. Small” [rectangular, white, printed and handwritten], “GENITALIA NO. / 2011: 406♀ / C. FAYNEL” [rectangular, green, printed] “Holotype ♀ / Oenomaus gwenish / Robbins & Faynel, 2012” [rectangular, red, printed]. Deposited in USNM.

Description, diagnosis and recognition as a distinct species.

Female FW length: 20 mm (N = 1). Wing pattern (Fig. 3) and genitalia (Fig. 27) illustrated. The wing patterns of Oenomaus gwenish and Oenomaus mancha are distinguished from that of Oenomaus ortygnusby the black patch in the distal part of the VHW cell Sc+R1-Rs and by the absence of a black mark in VFW cell Costa-Sc. However, the ventral wing pattern of Oenomaus gwenish differs from that of Oenomaus mancha by (1) the lack of a black band crossing the VFW discal cell, (2) the absence of a black spot in VFW cell M3-Cu1, and (3) the presence of two black spots of equal size along VHW veins mdc and ldc instead of a single large black spot at vein mdc with no mark or a faint vestigial mark at vein ldc. Thefemalegenitalia of Oenomaus gwenish (Fig. 27) are similar to those of Oenomaus mancha.

We hesitated to describe this species because we cannot assess its intraspecific variation. However, the series of 10 females of Oenomaus mancha show little variation in the traits that distinguish them from the holotype of Oenomaus gwenish. For this reason, a hypothesis of specific distinctness is better supported than a hypothesis of geographical variation.

Etymology.

The holotype of Oenomaus gwenish is a unique and distinctive female, for which reason it gives us great pleasure to name this species for entomologist Dr. Jennifer (Gwen) Shlichta. The name is a feminine noun in apposition.

Habitat and distribution.

Oenomaus gwenish is probably a lower montane species, so far known only from wet forest at 1000 m elevation in Darién, Panama (Fig. 46). While Oenomaus gwenish and Oenomaus ortygnus are both known from Panama, we do not know if they are sympatric.

Type-locality.

Ecuador: Napo, Misahuallí Rd, Latas Grande, 7.7 km E Puerto Napo, 1°02.0'S, 77°44.1'W, 470 m. The holotype was collected along the road from Tena to Misahuallí, which in 1991 was a patchwork of “fincas” and remnant second growth forest.

Type-specimen.

Holotype ♂ (Fig. 4) labeled as “ECUADOR Napo / Misahualli Rd. 470m / Latas Grande / 9 Nov.’ 91 / S. S. Nicolay” [rectangular, white, printed and handwritten], “USNM ENT 00180040” [rectangular, white, printed], “GENITALIA NO. / 2011: 408♂ / C. FAYNEL” [rectangular, green, printed] “Holotype ♂ / Oenomaus lea / Faynel & Robbins, 2012” [rectangular, red, printed]. Deposited in USNM.

Paratypes: Ecuador. 1 ♂: La Merced on Río Pastaza below Baños, Alt. 4000 ft. [= 1220 m], W. J. Coxey, III.1930, A.N.S. Lot 217, genitalia NO. 1992: 12 ♂ R.K. Robbins (ANSP). Peru. 3 ♂: UC, Pucallpa, 200 m, X.2007, Michael Büche leg. (CF); LO, Contamana, Río Ucayali, 300 m, 7°19'S, 74°48'W, IX.2010, leg J. Ramírez (LYD); SM, Juanjui, upper Huallaga River, IX. 1934, collector G. Klug, collection E.I. Huntington NO. 1055 (AMNH).

Description, diagnosis and recognition as a distinct species.

Male FW length: 18.2 mm (SD = 0.8, N = 4). Wing pattern (Fig. 4) and genitalia (Fig. 21) illustrated. Oenomaus lea and Oenomaus atesa (Hewitson, 1867)are the only two Eumaeini sharing the striking underside wing pattern with two transverse brown bands on the VHW. However, males of Oenomaus lea differ from males of Oenomaus atesa (Figs 5, 6 in Faynel 2006) by (1) a greater expanse of the DFW blue, especially in the area from vein R3 to vein Cu1, (2) two brown patches on the VFW instead of a single median brown band; one patch is located along the costa, and the other is triangular and situated in the basal part of cell Cu1-Cu2, and (3) a lighter dorsal blue color with a different hue of blue along the HW veins M2, M3, Cu1 and Cu2. Moreover, the black spot in VHW cell Cu1-Cu2 is usually more apparent in Oenomaus atesa than in Oenomaus lea. Males of Oenomaus lea alsodiffer genitalically from those of Oenomaus atesa (Fig. 26 in Faynel 2006) by (1) a longer and wider saccus, (2) the dorsal part of the valvae in lateral aspect shorter than the ventral part, and not pointed at the posterior end, (3) a straight penis in lateral view, and (4) no tooth at the end of the penis. The eighth tergum shows no difference from that of Oenomaus atesa. Lastly, the divergence of “barcode” DNA sequence data between Oenomaus lea (CF-LYC-005) and Oenomaus atesa (CF-LYC-003) is more than 6% (Table 1). The female of Oenomaus lea is unknown.

Etymology.

This species is named for Léa Faynel, daughter of Christophe Faynel. The name is a feminine noun in apposition.

Habitat and distribution.

Oenomaus lea occurs in wet lowland forest up to 1200 m elevation in eastern Ecuador and eastern Peru (Fig. 47).

Oenomaus myrteana Busby, Robbins & Faynel, sp. n.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B8EBB664-61DA-4178-91C8-52D2D9BFF0AC

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_myrteana

Figs 5, 6, 22, 28, 41, 46
Type-locality.

Ecuador: Morona Santiago, Santiago (Hill North of Town), 3°02.3'S, 78°00.3'W, 350 m. The holotype was collected in wet secondary forest in the low hills on the north edge of Santiago.

Type-specimen.

Holotype ♂ (Fig. 5) labeled as “ECUADOR: Morona Santiago / Santiago (Hill North of Town) / 3°02.3'S, 78°00.3'W 350 m / 20 September 2004 / Robert C. Busby, leg.” [rectangular, white, printed], “GENITALIA NO. / 2003: 35♂ / R.K. ROBBINS” [rectangular, green, printed] “Holotype ♂ / Oenomaus myrteana / Busby, Robbins & Faynel, 2012” [rectangular, red, printed]. Deposited in USNM.

Paratypes: Ecuador. 1 ♂: Morona Santiago, Santiago (Hill North of Town), 3°2.3'S, 78°0.3'W, 350 m, 20.IX.2006, Robert C. Busby leg. (RCB) ; 1♀: Morona-Santiago Province, 1.8 km Santiago-Puerto Morona Rd., 3°2.4'S, 77°59.7'W, 300–350 m, 20.IX.2006, D.H. Ahrenholz & Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°415 (RCB) (Fig. 6). Brazil. 2 ♂: RO, Cacaulândia, 1–5.IX.1997, E. Furtado & A. Moser leg., gen. prep. CF n°442 (MC 250); RO, Candeias do Jamari, Rio Preto, 27–31.VIII.1997, E. Furtado & A. Moser leg., gen. prep. CF n°443 (MC 251).

Description, diagnosis and recognition as a distinct species.

Male FW length: 12.8 mm (SD = 0.1, N = 3). Female FW length: 12.1 mm (N = 1). Wing pattern (Figs 5, 6) and genitalia (Figs 22, 28) illustrated. Oenomaus myrteana has a conspicuous round white spot in VHW cell Sc+R1-Rs, which is similar to those species of Oenomaus with a ventral wing patterns similar to that of Oenomaus atena. However, Oenomaus myrteana lacks the inclined white median line of the VFW, which is characteristic of species with the Oenomaus atena wing pattern. Instead, Oenomaus myrteana has a vertical, distally displaced postmedian line of white dashes, inwardly bordered by black. This character appears to be unique among Oenomaus species. In addition, Oenomaus myrteana may have a few red-orange scales in VHW cell Cu1-Cu2. This red-orange cubital spot is uniformly lacking in other Oenomaus and Porthecla. The male genitalia of Oenomaus myrteana are very similar to those of Oenomaus nigra, which has an “atena-like” ventral wing pattern. The female genitalia of Oenomaus myrteana are similar to those Oenomaus that have a bifid posterior end of the ductus bursae and a signa with a two pointed spine in the middle of the corpus bursae.

The ventral wing pattern of Oenomaus myrteana is superficially similar to those of Enos myrtea (Hewitson) and Allosmaitia myrtusa (Hewitson), but in these genera, males lack a scent pad on the DFW. The genitalia of Oenomaus myrteana, as noted, are typical of Oenomaus.

Etymology.

The name Oenomaus myrteana is intended to highlight the striking resemblance between the ventral hindwing of this species and that of Enos myrtea (Hewitson). The name is a feminine noun in apposition.

Habitat and distribution.

Oenomaus myrteana occurs in lowland wet forest from eastern Ecuador to western Brazil (Rondônia) (Fig. 46). Busby observed males in Ecuador low in the understory at 11:00 hours. This species and Enos myrtea have been found at the same site.

Type-locality.

Peru: Madre De Dios, Río La Torre, Tambopata Res., 12°50'13"S, 69°17'35"W, 300 m. Tambopata is at the mouth of the Río La Torre. In 1986 there was a lodge and a network of trails through uncut wet lowland forest. The holotype was collected during the transition between the dry and wet seasons when butterfly abundance and diversity generally peak.

Type-specimen.

Holotype ♂ (Fig. 7) labeled as “PERU Madre De Dios / Rio La Torre 300m / Tambopata Res. / 3 Oct.’ 86 / S. S. Nicolay” [rectangular, white, printed and handwritten], “GENITALIA NO. / 2011: 409♂ / C. FAYNEL” [rectangular, green, printed] “Holotype ♂ / Oenomaus mentirosa / Faynel & Robbins, 2012” [rectangular, red, printed]. Deposited in USNM.

Paratypes: Peru. 4 ♂: LO, km 28, Iquitos-Nauta, 180 m, 0359/7326, 30.X.2003, J.J. Ramírez leg. (MUSM) ; MD, Boca Río La Torre, 300 m, 17.IX.1984, I. Bohórquez leg., Genitalia NO. 1992: 47♂ R.K. Robbins (MUSM); MD, Boca Río La Torre, 300 m, 27.X.1981, G. Lamas et al., Genitalia NO. 1992: 48♂ R.K. Robbins (MUSM) ; MD, Tambopata Reserve, 12°50'S, 69°17'W, 300 m, 27.X.1990, Leg. R. Robbins, Genitalia NO. 1992: 39♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM ENT 00180049).

Description, diagnosis and recognition as a distinct species.

Male FW length: 14.9 mm (SD = 0.3, N = 2). Wing pattern (Fig. 7) and genitalia (Fig. 23) illustrated. The ventral wing pattern of Oenomaus mentirosa is very similar to some species of the Porthecla gemma group (Faynel et al. 2011), but the male genitalia have the non-triangular bifurcate valvae in lateral aspect that are characteristic of Oenomaus. Its genitalia, especially the valvae, are very similar to those of Oenomaus cortica (D’Abrera) and Oenomaus druceus Faynel & Moser. Oenomaus mentirosa is the only known Oenomaus species with red scales at the base on the VHW. In addition, it has a distinctive white spot along the VFW costa in cell Sc-R1. This feature occurs in no other Eumaeini except Porthecla minyia (Hewitson) where there are two white markings placed side by side in the cell between the costa and Sc. In male Oenomaus species, the eighth tergum is generally rectangular, but the anterior and posterior edges may be modified. In Oenomaus mentirosa, the male eighth tergum has a slightly modified anterior edge which looks like a shallow “W”. The female of Oenomaus mentirosa is unknown.

Etymology.

The name of this species comes from the Spanish word ‘mentirosa’, which means a feminine liar. We picked this name because the underside wing pattern resembles that of Porthecla gemma (Druce) and Porthecla minyia (Druce), but this resemblance appears to be a false indicator of relationship. We treat the name as a feminine noun in apposition.

Habitat and distribution.

Oenomaus mentirosa is known from lowland wet forest in Amazonian Peru (Fig. 47).

Remarks.

Resemblance of the ventral wing patterns of Oenomaus mentirosa and Porthecla gemma/Porthecla minyia was noted in the etymology. Adults of all three species fly in the same habitats at the same time of year in the vicinity of Puerto Maldonado, Peru.

Oenomaus andi Busby & Faynel, sp. n.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C6C09BC9-F0B9-4E7A-8951-0D9923BE9E73

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_andi

Figs 8, 9, 24, 29, 42, 43, 47
Type-locality.

Ecuador: Zamora Chinchipe Prov., Zamora (ridge W. of town), 4°04.5'S, 78°58.1'W, 1450 m. The ridge west of Zamora rises rather sharply from the city and is accessed by a dirt road which goes up to about 1300 m. The top of the ridge is still forested but a significant part of the surrounding land has been turned into pasture.

Type-specimen.

Holotype ♂ (Fig. 8) labeled as “ECUADOR / Zamora Chinchipe Prov. / Zamora (ridge W. of town) / 18. ix. 2000 (1450m) / leg. Robert C. Busby” [rectangular, white, printed], “GENITALIA NO. / 2009: 344♂ / C. FAYNEL” [rectangular, green, printed] “Holotype ♂ / Oenomaus andi / Busby & Faynel, 2012” [rectangular, red, printed]. Deposited in USNM.

Paratypes: Ecuador. 3♀: Morona-Santiago, 1 km E Río Abanico, 1600 m, 2°15.4'S; 78°11.7'W, 15.IX.2003, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°416 (RCB) (Fig. 9) ; Morona-Santiago, 14 km W. of Macas, 1600m, 28.IX.1998, Río Abanico, leg. Robert C. Busby (RCB); Zamora Chinchipe, Zamora (ridge W. of town), 4°04.5'S, 78°58.1'W, 1450 m, 06.X.2007, D. H. Ahrenholz, R. C. Busby leg. (RCB).

Other specimen examined.

Bolivia. 1♀: La Paz, Nor Yungas, Caranavi, 1500 m, XII. 2004, gen. prep. CF n°445 (MC 253).

Description, diagnosis and recognition as a distinct species.

Male FW length: 16.3 mm (N = 1). Female FW length: 16.7 mm (SD = 0.8, N = 2). Wing pattern (Figs 8, 9) and genitalia (Figs 24, 29) illustrated. The ventral wing pattern of Oenomaus andi is similar to that of many other Oenomaus, but this species is distinguished by (1) a white spot on the basal side of VHW cell Rs-M1, (2) an elongated double valvae of equal size, (3) a large posterior part of the saccus in lateral view, (4) a swollen terminal end of the penis, and (5) modified anterior and posterior edges of the male 8th tergum (detailed under remarks).

Etymology.

This species is named for Andrea (Andi) Busby, wife of Robert Busby, in appreciation for her long standing support of his research. The name is a feminine noun in apposition.

Remarks.

Valvae structure in Oenomaus andi is very similar to that found in Oenomaus gaia Faynel, suggesting that this new species belongs to the Oenomaus cortica subgroup (as characterized by Faynel and Moser 2008). Species in this subgroup have a modified 8th tergum (except for Oenomaus druceus Faynel & Moser, 2008). In the male of Oenomaus andi (Fig. 42), the posterior edge of the 8th tergum has a deep depression in the middle, while the anterior edge is shaped like a wide “W”. In the female, the posterior edge is nearly straight but is split in the middle. The anterior edge is similar to that of the male, but is laterally sclerotized (Fig. 43). The white spot on the basal side of VHW cell Rs-M1 occurs in only a few other Oenomaus species including Oenomaus geba (Hewitson), Oenomaus melleus (Druce), Oenomaus morroensis Faynel & Moser, and Oenomaus jauffreti Faynel & Moser. Regardless of whether the presence of this spot is evidence of relationship, it is very useful for separating Oenomaus andi from the other species of the Oenomaus cortica subgroup.

Habitat and distribution.

Oenomaus andi is a species of montane forest (> 1300 m) that is recorded from Ecuador to Bolivia (Fig. 47).

Behavior.

A male and two females were attracted to traps baited with rotting fish (vouchers in RCB).

Oenomaus moseri Robbins & Faynel, sp. n.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:DC5D1BF6-2149-4BB9-802D-58C27D11AB38

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_moseri

Figs 10, 11, 25, 30, 44, 45, 46
Type-locality.

Brazil: SC, Joinville, 26°19'39"S, 48°57'38"W, 10–200 m. Miers collected butterflies for decades in the wet lowland forests around Joinville, where he lived. His favorite collecting spot was a hill that he called “Serrinha” (little hill in Portuguese) in Vila Nova, approximately 10 km west, south-west of the center of Joinville. According to DZUP butterfly curator Olaf Mielke, specimens collected on Serrinha, including the holotype, have an elevation label 10–200 m, which distinguishes them from those specimens collected in other parts of the Joinville area.

Type-specimen.

Holotype ♂ (Fig. 10): Brazil, SC, Joinville, 10–200 m, 2.IV.1978, Miers leg., gen. prep. CF n°218, DZ 10.065, CF-LYC-012 (DZUP).

Paratypes: Brazil. 12 ♂: SC, Joinville, 200 m, 26°19'S, 48°58'W, 20.V.1971, H.Miers leg., gen. prep. CF n°444 (MC 252) ; SC, São Bento do Sul, 600 m, 25.IV.2002, Moser & Rank leg., gen. A. Moser, n°234 (MC 034) ; SC, Joinville, 200 m, 5.II.1993, A. Moser leg., gen. A. Moser, n°226 (MC 032); SC, Joinville, 200 m, 5.II.1993, A. Moser leg., gen. A. Moser n°233 (MC 033) ; SC, Joinville, 10–200 m, 8.XII.1983, Leg. H. Miers, R.K. Robbins collection (USNM) ; SC, Joinville, 10–200 m, 6.I.1984, Leg. H. Miers, R.K. Robbins collection (USNM) ; PR, Ponta Grossa, Buraco do Padre, 900 m, 20.II.2009, Carlos Mielke leg., CF-LYC-063 (CF) ; SP, Serra do Japi, 110[0m], 23°15'S, 46°54'W, 12.IV.1991, Robbins & K. Brown, territorial behavior at 14:23, Genitalia NO. 1992: 27♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM) ; SP, Serra do Japi, 110[0]m, 23°15'S, 46°54'W, 12.IV.1991, Robbins & K. Brown, territorial behavior at 14:48 (USNM) ; SP, Serra do Japi, 800–1250 m, 23°12'S, 47°02'W, 23°17'S, 46°53'W, 25.III.1990, Leg. K. Brown (x2, USNM) ; SP, Serra do Japi, 800–1250 m, 23°12'S, 47°02'W, 23°17'S, 46°53'W, 28.III.1990, Leg. K. Brown (USNM) ; RJ, Petrópolis, 6.I.1980, Leg. C. Callaghan, R.K. Robbins collection, Genitalia NO. 1992: 79♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM ENT 00180045). 1♀: SC, Joinville, 10–200 m, 9.III.1973, Leg. H. Miers, R.K. Robbins collection, gen. prep. CF n°410 (USNM) (Fig. 11).

Description, diagnosis and recognition as a distinct species.

Male FW length: 16.1 mm (SD = 0.9, N = 8). Female FW length: 15.7 mm (N = 1). Wing pattern (Figs 10, 11) and genitalia (Figs 25, 30) illustrated. The adult wing pattern of Oenomaus moseri is similar to that of the sympatric Oenomaus morroensis Faynel & Moser and to that of Oenomaus cyanovenata (D’Abrera); the species with which it was previously confused (Faynel 2008). Oenomaus moseri (Figs 25, 45) differs from Oenomaus morroensis (plate 11 in Faynel and Moser 2008) by its male genitalia having (1) a smaller dorsal part of the valvae attached to the top of the ventral part, not to the bottom, (2) a swollen posterior part of the male penis, and (3) a larger posterior part of the saccus in lateral view. Oenomaus moseri differs from O. cyanovenata by (1) a wider DFW black margin at the tornus, (2) a central depression on the posterior edge of the eighth tergum, and (3) a swollen posterior part of the male penis. Oenomaus moseri differs from the sympatric Oenomaus geba by lacking a white spot on the basal side of VHW cell Rs-M1 (Figs 10–12). The lack of geographical variation in the characters distinguishing Oenomaus moseri and Oenomaus cyanovenata argues against the hypothesis that the former is a geographical variant of the latter.

Preliminary data on divergence of “barcode” DNA sequence data is consistent with morphology. The divergence among three individuals of Oenomaus moseri (CF-LYC-012 & CF-LYC-063) is 0%, among four individuals of Oenomaus cyanovenata (CF-LYC-047, CF-LYC-048, & CF-LYC-049) is 0%. In contrast, the divergence between Oenomaus moseri and Oenomaus cyanovenata is more than 4% and between two Oenomaus moseri and a paratype of Oenomaus morroensis (CF-LYC-015) is more than 5%.

Etymology.

It is with great pleasure that we name this distinctive species for our good friend and collaborator Alfred Moser. Alfred lives in Rio Grande do Sul and has made prodigious contributions to the knowledge of Lepidoptera from southern Brazil, including co-authoring papers on the taxonomy of Oenomaus and Porthecla (Faynel and Moser 2008, Faynel et al. 2011).

Biology.

Robbins observed two males of Oenomaus moseri exhibiting territorial behavior on a hill top from 14:23 hours to 14:48 hours at Serra do Japi (SP, Brazil) on 12 April 1991 (vouchers in USNM). A male of Oenomaus moseri was reared by Hipólito Ferreira Paulino Neto in Itirapina, SP, Brazil on Duguetia furfuracea (A. St. Hil) Benth. and Hook. f. (Annonaceae), a plant of frequent occurrence in the cerrado. We identified the male from a digital image and from the locality where it was reared. However, it is possible that it is a male of Oenomaus morroensis, even though this species is not known to occur as far north as São Paulo.

Habitat and distribution.

Oenomaus moseri occurs in lowland and lower montane forest in southern Brazil (Fig. 46).

New data for previously described species of Oenomaus

For each of the 21 previously described Oenomaus species, we give distribution, habitat, and remarks. We then note, where relevant, new information on taxonomy, intraspecific variation, behavior/biology, associated females, and COI DNA sequences. The species are treated in alphabetical order. Oenomaus curiosa and Oenomaus melleus are included in this section, even though their generic placement is yet unresolved (Faynel et al. 2011).

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

Oenomaus ambiguus is a poorly known, lowland species whose ventral wing pattern is virtually indistinguishable from those of Oenomaus cortica and Oenomaus gaia. It has been recorded from French Guiana and Amazonian Peru. The previous record from Amazonas, Brazil (Faynel 2008) was incorrect.

New material examined. French Guiana

. 1♂: Bas Maroni, Guyane Française, gen. prep. CF n°319 (MNHN H-452). Peru.– 1♂: MD, Río La Torre, 300 m, Tambopata Res., 27.IX.1987, S.S. Nicolay, gen. prep. CF n°404 (USNM).

Female.

Unknown.

COI DNA sequence.

The paratype from Peru has been barcoded (CF-LYC-025), and the sequence is 2–3% divergent from those of Oenomaus cortica, Oenomaus gaia and Oenomaus morroensis (Table 1).

Oenomaus atena (Hewitson)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_atena

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

Oenomaus atena is a widely distributed lowland species that is reliably recorded from Costa Rica, Panama, western Ecuador, French Guiana, Venezuela, Peru, and Brazil (AM, MT). Most species with an “atena-like” ventral wing pattern have historically been identified as Oenomaus atena, which means that virtually all literature records for Oenomaus atena from before 2005 are unreliable.

New material examined.

Costa Rica.– 1♂: Guápiles, 850 ft. alt., June, Schaus and Barnes coll., genitalia on slide X-10-1946, W.D.F. 2333 (USNM). Panama.– 1♂: Cerro Campana, 2000’, XII-22-1963, G.B. Small, Genitalia 1992: 15♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM). Ecuador.– 1♂: Esmeraldas, 25 km San Lorenzo-Lita Road, 1°10.0'N, 78°40.0'W, 100 m, VI.2003, San Francisco, R. Aldas & Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°343 (RCB). Peru.– 2♂: MD, 30 km S.W. Pto. Maldonado, 300 m, 20.X.1983, S.S. Nicolay, Genitalia 1992: 16♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM); MD, 10 km north Puerto Maldonado, 200 m, 12°36'S, 69°11'W, 26–30.XI.1993, leg. C. Tello (USNM).

Female.

The female of this species was determined by a pair collected in copula and was illustrated by Faynel (2008, fig. 2).

COI DNA sequence.

Three specimens of Oenomaus atena have been barcoded, including a male from Peru (LO) (CF-LYC-084) and two females from French Guiana (CF-LYC-054 and CF-LYC-057). The latter two have the same brown dorsal wing pattern, ventral wing pattern, and genitalia as the female of Oenomaus atena found in copula. The three barcodes show 0.4% divergence.

Oenomaus atesa (Hewitson)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_atesa

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

Oenomaus atesa is a widespread species that has been recorded from Mexico, Panama, western Ecuador, French Guiana, Venezuela, Colombia, eastern Ecuador, Peru, and Brazil (AM, DF, MG, RJ, SP, SC). The vast majority of museum specimens were collected in the lowlands, but males have also been found at 1375–1700 m in western Ecuador and at 2200 m in western Colombia (Prieto and Dahners 2006).

New material examined.

Venezuela.– 1♀: Venezuela, Aragua, Rancho Grande, 1100 m, 29.V.1985, S.S. Nicolay leg., gen. prep. CF n°404 (USNM). Ecuador.– 2♂: Pichincha 5 km Nanegal-García Moreno Rd, 0°09.2'N, 78°39.4'W, 4.VI.2008, 1375–1700 m, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°340 (RCB);Napo Province, 14 km S of Tena, 17–18.X.1996, 600 m, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°347 (RCB). 1♀: Río Chuchuví, Lita vers San Lorenzo km12, 700 m (provincia de Esmeraldas), VIII.2001, Euclides Aldaz leg. (PB). Peru.– 1♀: LO, 180 m, San Salvador, 5 km NNW Contamana, 08°19'S, 75°01'W, 27.XI.2002, D.H. Ahrenholz leg., gen. prep. CF n°403 (USNM). Brazil.– 1♂: DF, Parque do Gama, 950 m, 14.V.1969, S.S. Nicolay leg., gen. prep. CF n°405 (USNM ENT 00180586).

Intraspecific variation.

Despite substantive geographical variation in Oenomaus atesa, we lack sufficient material to determine if this variation might represent more than one species. Females from Venezuela and western Ecuador have more extensive dorsal blue and a somewhat lighter color than females from Panama, French Guiana, eastern Ecuador, and Peru. In addition, males from western Ecuador have more blue on the dorsal forewings than males from eastern Ecuador. However, this variation is small compared to that between males of Oenomaus atesa and Oenomaus lea. For example, the forewing dorsal blue area never reaches the cells from vein R3 to Cu1 as it does in Oenomaus lea. Structure of the female genitalia also varies geographically. Females from Venezuela and Peru have two processes at the posterior end of the lamella postvaginalis while a female from French Guiana had none (see Faynel 2006, p. 29).

Behavior/biology.

Males exhibited territorial behavior on a hilltop in Panama (Canal Area, Gamboa, Cerro Pelado) from 13:15 to 15:30 hours (19 males, 10 different days during the months of January, February, March, April, August, September, October, and December, 15 vouchers in USNM). Similarly, territorial males on a hilltop in Brazil (Santa Catarina, Villa Nova, Serrinha) were observed from 14:40 to 14:55 hours (3 males, March, 3 vouchers in USNM).

Female.

Females are associated with males by their ventral wing pattern, which is unique among the Eumaeini. Characters were noted for distinguishing the ventral wing pattern of Oenomaus atesa from that of Oenomaus lea.

COI DNA sequence.

One male of Oenomaus atesa from French Guiana has been barcoded (CF-LYC-003).

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

Faynel (2008) described Oenomaus brulei from one male collected in the lowlands of French Guiana. Since then, another male and female from French Guiana have been examined.

New material examined.

French Guiana.– 1♂: Guyane, no date, S. Fernandez leg., CF-LYC-033 (CF). 1♀: Montagne des Singes, 5°07'N, 52°69'W, 5.XII.2007, T. Rosant leg., gen. prep. CF n°440, CF-LYC-034 (CF) (Fig. 14).

Female. We associate a female (Figs 14, 31) which has the same ventral wing pattern as the male, which occurs in French Guiana (as do the known males), and which has a very similar COI DNA sequence to that of the males.

COI DNA sequence.

Divergence among the three known specimens is 0.2%.

Oenomaus cortica (D’Abrera)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_cortica

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species occurs in wet lowland forest and is recorded from Panama, Guyana, Peru, and Brazil (PA, AM). Oenomaus cortica, Oenomaus gaia, and Oenomaus ambiguus have very similar wing patterns, but their genitalic structures are distinct.

New material examined.

Panama.– 1♂: Gatún, C. Z., 2.V.1970, G.B. Small leg., Genitalia 1992: 13♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM). Guyana.– 1♂: Potaro Riv., VIII-IX.1902, C.B. Roberts, Genitalia 1992: 74♂ R.K. Robbins (FSMC). Peru.– 1♂: MD, Parque Manu, Pakitza 340 m, 11°55'48"S, 71°15'18"W, 14.X.1991, Leg. R. Robbins, Genitalia No. 1996: 3♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM ENT 00180044).

Intraspecific variation.

The male from Panama has the posterior edge of its 8th tergum more deeply incised than in others.

Female.

Unknown. A female paratype of Oenomaus cortica from Espírito Santo, Brazil was illustrated in D’Abrera (1995), but no definitive evidence was presented to support this identification.

COI DNA sequence.

Two males from Brazil, Pará have been sequenced (CF-LYC-051 and CF-LYC-052) and show 0.6% divergence.

Oenomaus curiosa Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_curiosa

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

Oenomaus curiosa is a species of wet lowland forest that is recorded from French Guiana, Peru (LO, MD), and Brazil (RO).

New material examined.

Peru.– 2♂: MD, 300 m, 30 km S. W. Pto Maldonado, 26.X.1983, S.S. Nicolay, Genitalia No. 1992: 25♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM); LO, 120 m, Pebas, river Amazonas, 03°19'S, 71°51'W, II. 2011, Ramírez leg. (CF). Brazil.– 1♂: RO, 62 km SW Ariquemes, Línea 20, lot 21, 23, 25 (Fazenda Rancho Grande), 11.X.1993, AVZ Brower, gen. prep. CF n°433 (OSAC).

Female.

Unknown

COI DNA sequence.

Two males from French Guiana, including one of the paratypes, have been sequenced (CF-LYC-036 and CF-LYC-037) and show 0.8% divergence.

Oenomaus cyanovenata (D’Abrera)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_cyanovenata

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

A species of very wet lowland forest, it has been recorded from Costa Rica, Panama, French Guiana, Venezuela, Bolivia, and Brazil (PA, AM). The previous record for Brazil (SC) was incorrect; this specimen is now treated as Oenomaus moseri.

New material examined.

Costa Rica.– 1♂: Guápiles, 850 ft. alt., Schaus and Barnes coll., Genitalia 1992: 76♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM); 2♀: Area de Conservación Guanacaste, voucher: D.H. Janzen & W. Hallwachs 97-SRNP-62841.1, Genitalia 2009: 30♀ R.K. Robbins (USNM) (Fig. 16); 97-SRNP-6283. Panama.– 1♂: Colón, Piña, 100 m, 9.IV.1971, H.L. King, genitalia slide/vial #4710, prep. S.S. Nicolay (USNM). French Guiana.– 3♀: Roura, Route de Kaw - PK 16, 18.VII.2004, C. Faynel leg., CF-LYC-053 (CF); Roura, Route de Kaw, 26.I.2005, J.Y. Gallard leg., gen. prep. CF n°441, CF-LYC-055 (CF) (Fig. 17); Roura, Route de Kaw - PK 8, 20.XII.2001, J.Y. Gallard leg., CF-LYC-056 (CF). Brazil.– 3♀ : PA, Santo Antônio do Tauá, Reserva Sonho Azul, 1°15'S, 48°03'W, 12.VI.2009, P. & J. Jauffret leg., CF-LYC-059 (CF); PA, Santo Antônio do Tauá, Reserva Sonho Azul, 1°15'S, 48°03'W, 3.VIII.2009, P. & J. Jauffret leg., CF-LYC-060 (CF); PA, Santo Antônio do Tauá, Reserva Sonho Azul, 1°15'S, 48°03'W, 8.V.2009, P. & J. Jauffret leg., CF-LYC-061 (CF).

Intraspecific variation.

Females from French Guiana and Brazil, Pará (Fig. 17) are uniformly brown on the dorsal wing surface while the female from Costa Rica (Fig. 16) has the basal parts of both wings blue. Their genitalia, however, are uniform. Additionally, their COI DNA sequences are similar. This geographic variability is similar to that in Oenomaus taua.

Behavior/biology.

Two females were reared in Costa Rica (97-SRNP-62841.1 and 97-SRNP-6283) from Guatteria verrucosa R.E. Fr. (Annonaceae) (adult vouchers in USNM). Details of the rearing records along with images of the immatures can be found in Janzen and Hallwachs (2012).

Female.

Females of this species (Figs 16, 17, 32, 33) have the same ventral wing pattern as males, occur at the same localities, and have similar COI DNA sequences. A female paratype of Oenomaus cyanovenata from Pará, Brazil was designated and illustrated in D’Abrera (1995) without definitive supporting evidence. This female has a different dorsal wing pattern than the female from Pará that we have associated with the male. We are skeptical of the biological validity of this paratype designation.

COI DNA sequence.

Four males and seven females from French Guiana and Brazil, Pará were barcoded. One male (CF-LYC-046) is 6.7% divergent from the other three males, but its sequence is identical with that from a male of Oenomaus magnus (CF-LYC-020). Potential explanations for this result range from contamination to biologically significant, but until we have additional information, we omit this male from the following results. Divergence among the 10 other specimens of Oenomaus cyanovenata was 0.1%. The reared females from Costa Rica, which were barcoded in another project, are 0.4% divergent from the South American specimens.

Oenomaus druceus Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_druceus

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species was described from one Brazilian (AM) male, which is the only known specimen. As noted, its genitalia are similar to those of Oenomaus mentirosa, but it has a distinctly different ventral wing pattern.

Female.

Unknown.

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species occurs in lowland and lower montane habitats with wet or deciduous forest. It is recorded from eastern Ecuador and Brazil (AM, MT, DF, GO, PR).

New material examined.

Ecuador.– 1♂: Pastaza Province, 45 km Puyo-Arajuno Rd., 1000 m, 26.IX.1999, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°342 (RCB). Brazil.– 2♂: GO, 163 km W. Jataí S. Rita Araguaia, 850 m, 29.V.1969, S.S. Nicolay, genitalia slide/vial #4367, prep. S.S. Nicolay (USNM); PR, Highlands, 24.XI.1934, coll. Karl Schmitt, E.I. Huntington, Genitalia 1992: 19♂ R.K. Robbins (AMNH).

Female.

Described by Faynel and Moser (2008).

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species occurs in wet and dry lowland forest. It has been recorded from Panama, French Guiana, Venezuela, eastern Ecuador, Peru (LO, SM, UC, MD) and Brazil (PA, AM, RO, MT, GO). This species, Oenomaus floreus, and maybe Oenomaus griseus occur in drier forest than other species with an “atena-like” ventral wing pattern.

New material examined.

Panama.– 1♂: Los Ríos, C. Z., 15.XII.1964, S.S. Nicolay leg., Genitalia 1992: 73♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM ENT 00180046). 2♀: Los Ríos, C. Z., 27.I.1965, S.S. Nicolay, gen. prep. CF n°430 (USNM) (Fig. 15); Los Ríos, C. Z., 19.XII.1964, G.B. Small, gen. prep. CF n°431 (USNM). Ecuador.– 1♂: Morona-Santiago 15 km S Gualaquiza, 850 m, 3°27.6'S, 78°33.1'W, 27.IX.2000, Robert C. Busby leg. (RCB). Peru.– 1♂: MD, Parque Manu, Pakitza 340 m, 11°55'48"S, 71°15'18"W, 15.X.1991, Leg. M. Casagrande, Genitalia No. 1992: 38♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM). Brazil.– 2♂: PA, Obidos, IX.1930, Ex coll. Le Moult, Genitalia No. 1992: 75♂ R.K. Robbins; PA, Santo Antônio do Tauá, Reserva Sonho Azul, 1°15'S, 48°03'W, 16.VII.2003, P. & J. Jauffret leg., CF-LYC-072 (CF); RO, 62 km SW Ariquemes, Línea 20, lot 21, 23, 25 (Fazenda Rancho Grande), 11.X.1993, AVZ Brower, gen. prep. CF n°411 (OSAC); GO, Pirenópolis, 820 m, 15°49'S, 48°59'W, E. Emery leg. (MC 255).

Female.

Four males in the USNM were collected on hills on Los Ríos hill (approximately 9°00'32"N, 79°35'34"W) and in Cocolí (approximately 8°58'46"N, 79°35'59"W), Canal Area, Panama. These areas are drier (<2 m annual precipitation, Rand and Rand 1982) than the forest in which other Oenomaus with an “atena-like” wing pattern have been found in Panama. Four females from these two localities have the same ventral wing pattern as the males. Since no other males are known from these localities, we associate the sexes and illustrate the adult wing pattern and genitalia of one of these females (Figs 15, 34).

We also associate a female from Brazil, Pará (CF-LYC-072) with a male of Oenomaus gaia from French Guiana because they have the same ventral wing pattern and have similar barcode sequences (0.2%).

COI DNA sequence.

As noted previously, interspecific variation in the barcode sequences of Oenomaus ambiguus, Oenomaus cortica, Oenomaus gaia, Oenomaus morroensis is less than 2%, in contrast to interspecific divergences among other species in Oenomaus. For example males of Oenomaus gaia (CF-LYC-023) and Oenomaus cortica (CF-LYC-052) are 0.8% divergent. Another male of Oenomaus gaia (CF-LYC-024) and Oenomaus morroensis (CF-LYC-015) are 1.1% divergent.

Oenomaus geba (Hewitson)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_geba

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species is a relatively uncommon inhabitant of lower montane forest in southern Brazil, so far known only from the state of Santa Catarina. Previously, it was known only from the male holotype, which lacks locality data.

New material examined.

Brazil.– 5♂: SC, Highlands near Massaranduba-Blumenau, Collection E.I. Huntington No. 1009 (AMNH, x4); SC, Highlands near Massaranduba-Blumenau, Collection E.I. Huntington No. 1009, genitalia slide/vial #4705, prep. S.S. Nicolay, Allyn Museum Photo No. 022078-7, 8 VI (AMNH) . 2♀: SC, Rio Vermelho, São Bento do Sul, 10.III.1973, leg. Rank, gen. prep. CF n°414 (USNM ENT 00180041); SC, Highlands near Massaranduba-Blumenau, Collection E.I. Huntington No. 1009, genitalia slide/vial #4707, prep. S.S. Nicolay, Allyn Museum Photo No. 022078-9, 10 VI (AMNH).

Female.

The female (Figs 12, 35) occurs in the same habitat as the male and has the same ventral wing pattern.

Oenomaus griseus Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_griseus

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species appears to be endemic to Brazil’s central plateau (DF).

Female.

Unknown.

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This widespread South American species occurs in wet and dry lowland forests. It is recorded from French Guiana, Colombia, eastern Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil (AM, MG).

New material examined.

Colombia.– 1♀: Muzo, 400b. 800 m, coll. Fassl (SMF). Ecuador.– 2♀: Morona-Santiago, Santiago (Hill North of Town), 3°02.3'S, 78°00.3'W, 350 m, 20.IX.2010, Robert C. Busby leg. (RCB); 27 km Santiago-Puerto Moreno Rd., 2°56.4'S, 77°49.5'W, 500–550 m, 17 IX 2005, Robert C. Busby, leg. (RCB). Peru.– 1♀: JU, Aldea, 600–700 m, 1054/7455, 23.VIII.2003, J.J. Ramírez (MUSM). Brazil. – 2♂: MG, km 500 Belo Horizonte-Brasília, Hwy, 11.IV.1973, C. Callaghan, genitalia slide/vial #4737, prep. S.S. Nicolay (USNM); AM, Rio Amazonas, Vila Nova (ca. Tonantins, 0252S/6748), 100 m, IX.1993, M. Büche leg. (MUSM). Bolivia.– 1♂: Las Juntas, XII. 1913, Steinbach Acc. 5045, genitalia slide/vial #4743, prep. S.S. Nicolay (CMNH).

Female.

The distinctive ventral wing pattern of this species allows identification of the female.

COI DNA sequence.

Sequences from a Brazilian male (CF-LYC-006) and French Guiana female paratype (CF-LYC-007) diverge 3.0%.

Oenomaus jauffreti Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_jauffreti

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species inhabits wet lowland forest. It is recorded from French Guiana, eastern Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil (PA, MT).

New material examined.

Ecuador.– 1♂: Pastaza Province, 32 km S. of Puyo, 20–21.X.1996, 1000 m, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°346 (RCB). Peru.– 1♂: LO, Agua Blanca, 0356/7328, 130 m, 10.XI.2005, J.J. Ramírez (MUSM). 2♀: JU, vic. Satipo, c. 800 m, Villa Esperanza, c. 11°16'S, 74°15'W, V.1983, leg. M. Callegari (USNM) ; LO, Cerros de Contamana, El Indio, 200 m, 10.IX.1986, P. Hocking (MUSM). Bolivia.– 1♂: Río Songo, 750 m, coll. Fassl, Genitalia No. 2002: 5♂ R.K. Robbins (SMF).

Intraspecific variation.

As noted by Faynel and Moser (2008), Oenomaus jauffreti is a variable species, especially ventrally. For example, the VHW basal spot in cell Sc+R1 is large and mostly white in French Guiana; is small, black with a white centered pupil in Brazil (MT), and is large, with black and white scales in Ecuador. The only element which seems to be stable is the presence of a white spot on the basal side of VHW cell Rs-M1.

Female.

Females were associated with males by their characteristic ventral wing pattern (Faynel and Moser 2008). Six specimens of Oenomaus jauffreti have been barcoded (four males and two females), including three male paratypes (CF-LYC-028, CF-LYC-029, CF-LYC-030) and one female paratype (CF-LYC-032). The six barcodes show 1.2% divergence.

Oenomaus magnus Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_magnus

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This is a poorly understood species that occurs in South American lowland forest. It has been recorded from French Guiana, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil (AM, MT).

New material examined.

French Guiana.– 1♀: Approuague - Mapaou, 4°31'N, 52°13'W, 29. XII. 2008,  S. Fernandez leg. (CF) (Fig. 13). Peru.– 1♀: SM, Upper Huallaga Valley, V-VI 2000, Purch. Thorne 7/01, gen. prep. CF n°428 (USNM). Brazil.– 1♂: MT, Diamantino, Alto Rio Arinos, 5.X.1998, E. Furtado leg., gen. prep. CF n°446 (MC 254). Bolivia.– 1♀: “Thecla melleus Drc.♀, Buenavista 750 m, Bolivia Steinbach., Modt. 22/2 1927 af, qui Steinbach Bolivia, Coll. C.S. Larsen, Faaborg, gen. prep. CF n° 449 (MNHN).

Female.

We associate females from French Guiana (Figs 13, 36), Peru, and Bolivia with this species. They have the same ventral wing pattern, a similar geographic range, and limited COI DNA sequences are the same.

COI DNA sequence.

The sequence of a female from French Guiana (CF-LYC-039) is the same as (0% divergence) that of the male paratype from Peru (CF-LYC-020). This female is the first record of Oenomaus magnus from French Guiana.

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species occurs in wet lowland forest. It is recorded from Nicaragua, Costa Rica, French Guiana, Guyana, Venezuela, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil (PA, PE, ES).

New material examined.

Costa Rica.– 2♂: Heredia, prov. Finca La Selva, 3 km S. Puerto Viejo, 10°26'N, 84°01'W, 26.VII.1992, leg. H.A. Hespenheide (USNM) ; prov. Heredia, F. La Selva, 3 km S. Pto. Viejo, 10°26'N, 84°01'W, 5.IV.1985, H.A. Hespenheide (USNM). 1♀: Area de Conservación Guanacaste, voucher Janzen & Hallwachs #97-SRNP-62841, legs away for DNA, Genitalia 2009: 30♀ R.K. Robbins (USNM) (Fig. 20). Guyana.– 1♂: Region 7 Lower Cuyuni River nr. Arimu R. 100’, 6°34'N, 58°58'W, 2.IX.1991, leg. S. Fratello (USNM ENT 00180024). Brazil.– 1♂: ES, Itaguassú, IX.1971, Paulo César Elias, A.C. Allyn Acc. 1971-38, genitalia slide/vial #4700, prep. S.S. Nicolay (USNM). 1♀: PE, Recife, 5.I.1962, leg. Ebert (USNM).

Taxonomy.

Faynel (2007, 2008) partitioned this species into a Transandean Region (terminology from Brown 1982) nominate subspecies and an Amazonian Region subspecies Oenomaus melleus guyanensis based on size and color of scales at the base of the VFW. The male genitalia of each taxon were the same. As noted in the next paragraph, the new material examined does not confirm this recognition of two taxa. For example, the Costa Rican specimens resemble the Amazonian ones. For this reason, we synonymize Oenomaus melleus guyanensis Faynel with Oenomaus melleus melleus (Druce), new synonym.

Intraspecific variation.

The wing pattern of Oenomaus melleus is highly variable. The type from Colombia and two specimens from Nicaragua and Venezuela are relatively large (male FW length = 16.8 mm, SD = 1.3, N = 3). They have a white spot on the basal part of VHW cell Rs-M1, no reddish scales on the basal part of ventral wing, and a black spot in VHW cell Cu1-Cu2. The specimens from French Guiana, Guyana, Brazil (PA), Venezuela and Peru (UC) are smaller (male FW length = 14.1 mm, SD = 0.4, N = 5). They have a white spot on the basal part of VHW cell Rs-M1, reddish scales on the basal part of ventral wing, and no black spot in VHW cell Cu1-Cu2. The males from Costa Rica are also relatively small (male FW length = 14.7 mm, SD = 1.6, N = 3). They have no white spot on the basal part of VHW cell Rs-M1, no reddish scales on the basal part of ventral wing and a black spot in VHW cell Cu1-Cu2.

Female.

Described by Faynel (2008).

Oenomaus morroensis Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_morroensis

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

Described by Faynel and Moser (2008) from five males from Brazil (SC, RS), but no other specimens are known. It appears to be a species of lower montane and subtropical forest.

Intraspecific variation.

A small white spot on VHW cell Sc+R1-Rs that is displaced basally (Faynel and Moser 2008) is present in the holotype, but not in the paratypes.

Behavior/biology.

Although Oenomaus morroensis is unrecorded north of Santa Catarina, a reared male from São Paulo (see under Oenomaus moseri) could possibly be this species.

Female.

Unknown.

COI DNA sequence.

One paratype has been barcoded (CF-LYC-015). As already noted, this sequence is 5.0% divergent from the sympatric and superficially similar Oenomaus moseri.

Oenomaus nigra Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_nigra

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species occurs in wet lowland forest. It has been recorded from Peru and Brazil (AM). As noted, the genitalia of this species are similar to those of the newly described Oenomaus myrteana.

New material examined.

Peru.– 3♂: LO, Agua Blanca, 0356/7328, 130 m, 17.V.2004, J.J. Ramírez leg. (MUSM, x3). Brazil.– 1♂: AM, S. Paulo de Olivença, X.1983, Via Kesselring, Genitalia No. 1983: 133♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM ENT 00180054).

Female.

Unknown.

COI DNA sequence.

One male of Oenomaus nigra from Peru has been barcoded (CF-LYC-148).

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species occurs in many different habitats from sea level up to 1000 m. It is unique in the genus in that it is often found in highly disturbed habitats. It is the most common Oenomaus species in collections and has been recorded from the United States, Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, French Guiana, Surinam, Guyana, Trinidad, Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and many states throughout Brazil. As noted in the introduction, this species is a well-known pest of commercial Annonaceae.

Intraspecific variation.

The blacks spots on ventral wings vary in size and the blue on the dorsal wings vary from light cyan to dark purple. The “Thecla lauta Draudt” phenotype from western Mexico is smaller and duller than individuals from the remainder of its range.

Behavior/biology.

Males were territorial on hilltops between 14:00–15:15 hours in Panama (Canal Area, hilltops in Paraíso, 7 males during June and August, 6 vouchers in USNM) and between 14:29 and 15:15 on Serrinha in Brazil (hilltop in Santa Catarina, Villa Nova, 200 m, 3 males in March, vouchers in USNM).

Female.

Both sexes are recognized by their ventral wing pattern, which is unique in the genus.

COI DNA sequence.

Sequences from a Peruvian male (CF-LYC-147) and a Mexican male (CF-LYC-146) diverge 1.5%.

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species occurs in wet lowland forest. It has been recorded from French Guiana and Brazil (PA, AM).

New material examined.

Brazil.– 1♂. Santarém, Amazons, A.H. Fassl, 3.IV.1920, gen. prep. CF n°317 (MNHN H-447).

Female.

Described by Faynel (2008).

Oenomaus taua Faynel & Moser

http://species-id.net/wiki/Oenomaus_taua

Distribution, habitat, and remarks.

This species is widespread in wet lowland forest. It is recorded from Guatemala, Panama, French Guiana, eastern Ecuador, Peru, and Brazil (PA, AM, RO). It is one of the more common species in the genus and mating pairs have been collected in Panama, Ecuador, and Brazil.

New material examined.

Guatemala.– 1♂: Cayuga, Sept., Schaus & Barnes coll., Genitalia No. 1992: 28♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM). Panama.– 2♂: Canal Zone, Gamboa, 5.I.1979, Leg. R. Robbins, in copula 15:00, Genitalia No. 1982: 125♂ R.K. Robbins (USNM ENT 00180050); Canal Zone, Summit, 17.III.1979, Leg. R. Robbins, in copula 15:00, gen. prep. CF n°423 (USNM). 2♀: Canal Zone, Gamboa, 5.I.1979, Leg. R. Robbins, in copula 15:00, Genitalia No. 1982: 126♀ R.K. Robbins (USNM ENT 00180051) (Fig. 18); Canal Zone, Summit, 17.III.1979, Leg. R. Robbins, in copula 15:00, gen. prep. CF n°424 (USNM). Ecuador.– 2♂: Napo, 14 km Tena-Puyo Road, 1°06.7'S, 77°46.9'W, 600 m, X.2010 (Apuya), I. Aldas & Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°418 (RCB);Napo Province, 14 km S. of Tena, 600 m, 17–18.X.1996 (Apuya), mating pair, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°345 (RCB). 1♀: Napo Province, 14 km S. of Tena, 600 m, 17–18.X.1996 (Apuya), mating pair, Robert C. Busby leg., gen. prep. CF n°417 (RCB) (Fig. 19). Brazil.– 1♂: RO, 160–350 m, vic. Cacaulândia, 10°32'S, 62°48'W, 19.X.1991, in copula, Leg. J. MacDonald, gen. prep. CF n°412 (USNM). 1♀: RO, 160–350 m, vic. Cacaulândia, 10°32'S, 62°48'W, 19.X.1991, in copula, Leg. J. MacDonald, gen. prep. CF n°413 (USNM); PA, Santo Antônio do Tauá, Reserva Sonho Azul, 1°15'S, 48°03'W, 2.III.2010, P. & J. Jauffret leg. (CF).

Intraspecific variation.

Females from Brazil and Ecuador (Fig. 19) are uniformly brown on the dorsal wing surface while the female from Panama (Fig. 18) has the basal parts of both wings blue. Their genitalia, however, are uniform. This geographic variability is similar to that in Oenomaus cyanovenata.

Behavior/ biology.

Territorial behavior on a hilltop in Panama (Canal Area, Gamboa, Cerro Pelado) was observed in January and August at 15:00 hours (vouchers in USNM). Two mating pairs were also collected on the same hilltop in January and March at 15:00 hours (vouchers in USNM).

Female.

We illustrate adult females that were collected in copula (Figs 18–19) and the genitalia of one (Fig. 37).

COI DNA sequence.

A female from Brazil, Pará (CF-LYC-064), which has a wing pattern similar to the females collected in copula, is 3.1% divergent from a male from Peru (CF-LYC-085).

Discussion

Taxonomy. A decade ago Oenomaus was a monotypic genus, but it now consists of 28 described species (albeit, it is still unclear if Oenomaus melleus and Oenomaus curiosa belong to Oenomaus or Porthecla). Further, if a phylogenetic analysis shows that Porthecla is paraphyletic in terms of Oenomaus, which is possible because Porthecla was distinguished by character states that may be plesiomorphic, then Oenomaus will be one of the most species-rich eumaeine genera with 40 species (Robbins 2004).

There are three biological reasons why the diversity of Oenomaus was not recognized until recently. First, about ¾ of the species have an indistinguishable, or barely distinguishable, ventral wing pattern that is similar to that of Oenomaus atena (e.g., Figs 12–19). Among species with this wing pattern, there is a great diversity of male genitalic forms that were first documented by Faynel (2006, 2008) and Faynel and Moser (2008). Second, the ventral wing pattern of a few species is different from that of Oenomaus atena (e.g., Figs 1–7), but similar to that of sympatric species that are now considered to be distantly related. For example, Draudt (1919–1920) in Seitz grouped Oenomaus ortygnus (the type species of Oenomaus), now placed in the Panthiades Section, with Atlides rustan (Stoll), now placed in the Atlides Section (Robbins 2004). Similarly, he placed Oenomaus atesa in a group with Enos mazurka (Hewitson) in the Brangas Section. Oenomaus myrteana, which is described in this paper, closely resembles Enos myrtea while Oenomaus mentirosa, also newly described, has a ventral wing pattern that resembles species in Porthecla, Olynthus Hübner, Janthecla Robbins & Venables, and Atlides Hübner (documented in Faynel et al. 2011). Third, many Oenomaus species are exceedingly rare in collections. Indeed, three species are still known from only one individual each.

DNA barcoding. Thirty-eight Oenomaus males belonging to 19 species have been successfully “barcoded” (>200 bp) (extraction and sequencing methods given in Hajibabaei et al. 2006). For those nine species for which there is more than one barcode (Table 1), intraspecific divergence calculated on the Bold web site (http://www.boldsystems.org/views/login.php) using the Kimura 2 parameter with sequences aligned by BOLD varied from 0% to 1.6%. Interspecific divergence (Table 1) varied from 0.8% to 9.7% (672 comparisons, mean distance: 6.1%). It was usually greater than 4% except in the Oenomaus cortica species group (Oenomaus gaia, Oenomaus cortica, Oenomaus morroensis), where it was about 1%. Similarity in COI sequences among closely related species is well-established (e.g., Burns et al. 2007).

Male-female associations. Associating males and females in Oenomaus is sometimes very difficult. Only eight of the 28 recognized species previously had the sexes associated. In this paper we associate the sexes of another ten species based on mating pairs collected in copula and on similarity of ventral wing patterns, habitats, geographic distributions, and mitochondrial COI DNA sequences. The DNA “barcodes” have great potential (e.g., Janzen et al 2009), especially if there are large samples from geographically diverse sites.

Biology. Oenomaus ortygnus is a well-known pest of cultivated soursop (also called guanábana, Annona muricata L., Annonaceae) and relatives (e.g., Dampf 1929, Fennah 1937, Ballou 1945, Guagliumi 1965, 1967, Araque 1967, d’Araújo e Silva et al. 1967–1968, Leal 1970, Kendall 1975, Domínguez 1978, Peña et al. 2002, Castañeda-Vildózola et al. 2011). As noted in the results of this paper, two other Oenomaus species have now been reared, and Annonaceae (Duguetia, Guatteria) is a food plant for each. Although data are yet too scanty to ask why Oenomaus ortygnus is the only Oenomaus species that has been recorded as a pest on cultivated Annonaceae, we note that it is also the only Oenomaus species that is regularly found in disturbed habitats.

Most Oenomaus species inhabit relatively undisturbed lowland wet forest, but some species seem to be restricted to other habitats. Oenomaus andi is montane, being found so far only above 1450 m, while Oenomaus geba is known only from lower montane forest. Oenomaus morroensis occurs so far only in subtropical and lower montane forest. Oenomaus druceus has been found only in scrubby deciduous forest. A number of other Oenomaus species have broader habitat requirements. Some wet lowland species also occur in montane habitats, for which Oenomaus atesa and Oenomaus moseri are representative examples. Others, such as Oenomaus floreus, O. gaia, and Oenomaus isabellae, may inhabit dry deciduous forest. As previously noted, Oenomaus ortygnus is the only Oenomaus species that is regularly found in both undisturbed and disturbed habitats.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Evgeny V. Zakharov (data manager, University of Guelph, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Canada) for collaboration in sequencing the mitochondrial COI gene (BOLD project) and Dr D. H. Janzen for allowing us to use his barcode results for Oenomaus from Costa Rica. Accordingly, we thank Stéphane Brûlé (SEAG), Pierre and Jacques Jauffret for hairstreak legs; Jean-Yves Gallard, Serge Fernandez and Thibault Rosant for material from French Guiana.

For allowing us to examine specimens in collections under their care, we are grateful to Dr Jacques Pierre (MNHN), Blanca Huertas (NHM), Dr Gerardo Lamas (MUSM), Dr Olaf H.H. Mielke (DZUP), Dr David Grimaldi and Suzanne Rab Green(AMNH). For giving us access to their personal collections, we thank Pierre Boyer (France), Louis and Yvan Diringer (France), Christian Castelain (France), Alfred Moser (Brazil), Carlos Prieto (Colombia) and Jean-François Le Crom (Colombia).

For comments on the type locality of Oenomaus moseri, we are grateful to Olaf H.H. Mielke. For allowing us to use his data on the breeding of Oenomaus moseri, we thank Hipólito Ferreira Paulino Neto (Brazil). For checking Peruvian localities, we thank Gerardo Lamas. For reading and commenting upon the manuscript, we thank John Burns and Carlos Prieto. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Finally, the senior author acknowledges a Smithsonian Institution short term visitor fellowship during summer 2011.

References
Alcock J, O’Neill KM (1987) Territory preferences and intensity of competition in the grey hairstreak Strymon melinus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and the tarantula hawk wasp Hemipepsis ustulata (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae). American Midland Naturalist 11: 120–138. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2425635?uid=3738016&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21101113843477
Araque R (1967) La guanábana. Serie de Cultivos. Consejo de Bienestar rural (Caracas) 13: 1–16.
Ballou CH (1945) Notas sobre insectos daninos observados en Venezuela 1938–1943. Tercera conferencia interamericana de agricultura (Caracas) 34: 1-151.
Brown KS (1982) Historical and ecological factors in the biogeography of aposematic neotropical butterflies. American Zoologist 22: 453–471. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3882674?uid=3738016&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21101113843477
Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2007) DNA barcodes of closely related (but morphologically and ecologically distinct) species of skipper butterflies (Hesperiidae) can differ by only one to three nucleotides. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 61: 138–153. http://entomology.si.edu/staffpages/Burns/JLSx-07Burns.pdf
Castañeda-Vildózola A, Nava-Díaz C, Duarte M, Franco-Mora O, Hernández-Fuentes LM (2011) New Host Plant Records for Oenomaus ortygnus (Cramer) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Mexico. Neotropical Entomology 40(4): 512–514. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2011000400018
Clench HD (1964) A new hairstreak for the United States. Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 18 (3): 189-190.
Comstock JH (1918) The wings of insects. The Comstock Publishing Company, Ithaca, 430 pp.
Dampf AEAM (1929) Informe de las actividades de la Oficina Federal para la Defensa Agrícola, durante los meses de enero a marzo de 1929. Boletín mensual. Oficina federal para la Defensa agrícola (Tacubaya, D.F.) 3(1/4): 68–95, 1 pl., 8 figs, 6 tabs.
D’Abrera BL (1995) Butterflies of the Neotropical region. Part VII. Lycaenidae. Black Rock, Hill House, pp. i-xi + 1098–1270.
d’Araújo e Silva AG, Gonçalves CR, Galvão DM, Gonçalves AJL, Gomes J, do Nascimento Silva M, de Simoni L (1967–1968) Quarto catálogo dos insetos que vivem nas plantas do Brasil. Ministério da Agricultura, Rio de Janeiro, Part I, Vol. 1, 422 pp., Vol. 2, 906 pp., Part II, Vol.1, 622 pp., Vol. 2, 265 pp.
Domínguez OE (1978) Insectos perjudiciales del guanábano (Annona muricata L.) en el Estado Zulia, Venezuela. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (Maracay) 4(3): 149–163, 9 figs
Draudt M (1919–1920) Theclini F. In: Seitz A (Ed). Macrolepidoptera of the World, vol. V, The American Rhopalocera, Stuttgart, Alfred Kernen Verlag: 744-812.
Elias M, Joron M, Willmott K, Silva-Brandão KL, Kaiser V, Arias CF, Gomez Piñerez LM, Uribe S, Brower AVZ, Freitas AVL, Jiggins CD (2009) Out of the Andes: patterns of diversification in clearwing butterflies. Molecular Ecology 18: 1716-1729. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04149.x
Faynel C (2006) Le genre Oenomaus Hübner, 1819, en Guyane française (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 111(2): 137–156. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17969795
Faynel C (2007) Thecla floreus Druce, 1907, et T. melleus Druce, 1907, révision de leur statut (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 112(1): 9–15. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=18643062
Faynel C (2008) Le genre Oenomaus Hübner, 1819, en Guyane française. 2e partie (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 113(1): 15–32. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=20207676
Faynel C, Moser A (2008) The neotropical genus Oenomaus Hübner with the description of eight new species belonging to the atena group (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Lambillionea, 108(2): Supplément I, 36 pp.
Faynel C, Busby RC, Moser A, Robbins RK (2011) Species level taxonomy of the Neotropical hairstreak genus Porthecla (Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini). Ann. Soc. Ent. Fr.47(1–2): 241–259. http://zoologie.umh.ac.be/asef/contents.asp?action=detailvol&volID=55
Fennah RG (1937) Lepidopterous pests of the sour-sop in Trinidad. (2) Thecla ortygnus Cramer. Trop. Agric. 14:244–245 + 2 plates.
Guagliumi P (1965) Contributo all conoscenza dell’entomofuana nociva del Venezuela (coninuazione e fine). Rivista di Agricoltura subtropicale e tropicale. 59: 447-472.
Guagliumi P (1967) Insetti e arachnidi delle piante comuni del Venezuela segnalati nel periodo 1938–1963. Relazione e Monografie agrarie subtropicale e tropicale. (N.S.) 86: 391 pp.
Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 968–971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510466103
Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns JM, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 14812–14817. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406166101
Holdridge LR (1967) Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica, 206 pp.
Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2012) Dynamic database for an inventory of the macrocaterpillar fauna, and its food plants and parasitoids, of Area de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG), northwestern Costa Rica. http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu [accessed April 2012]
Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Blandin P, Burns JM, Cadiou J-M, Chacon I, Dapkey T, Deans AR, Epstein ME, Espinoza B, Franclemont JG, Haber WA, Hajibabaei M, Hall JPW, Hebert PDN, Gauld ID, Harvey DJ, Hasumann A, Kitching IJ, Lafontaine D, Landry J-F, Lemaire C, Miller J Y, Miller JS, Miller L, Miller SE, Montero J, Munroe E, Green SR, Ratnasingham S, Rawlins JE, Robbins RK, Rodriguez JJ, Rougerie R, Sharkey MJ, Smith MA, Solis MA, Sullivan JB, Thiaucourt P, Wahl DB, Weller SJ, Whitfield JB, Willmott KR, Wood DM, Woodley NE, Wilson JJ (2009) Integration of DNA barcoding into an ongoing inventory of complex tropical biodiversity. Molecular Ecology Resources 9 (Supplement 1): 1–26. http://entomology.si.edu/StaffPages/Robbins/2009-Janzen-%20etal_MER-Barcodes.pdf
Kendall RO (1975) Larval foodplants for seven species of hairstreaks (Lycaenidae) from Mexico. Bull. Allyn Mus. 24, 4 pp.
Klots AB (1970) Lepidoptera. In Tuxen SL (Ed) Taxonomist’s glossary of genitalia in insects. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 115–130.
Leal FJ (1970) Notas sobre la guanábana (Annona muricata) en Venezuela. Proceedings of the tropical Region. American Society for horticultural Science 14: 118–121, 2 tabs.
Nicolay SS (1971) A review of the genus Arcas with descriptions of new species (Lycaenidae, Strymonini). Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 25: 87-108.
Peña JE, Nadel H, Barbosa-Pereira M, Smith D (2002)Pollinators and pests of Annona species, pp. 197–221, 2 figs, 1 tab. In: Peña JE, Sharp JL, Wysoki M (Eds) Tropical fruit pests and pollinators. Biology, economic importance, natural enemies and control. Wallingford, CABI Publishing, 197–221. doi: 10.1079/9780851994345.0197
Prieto CH, Dahners HW (2006) Eumaeini (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) del cerro San Antonio: Dinámica de la riqueza y comportamiento de “hilltopping”. Revista colombiana de Entomología 32 (2): 179-190.
Prieto CH, Dahners HW (2009) Resource utilization and environmental and spatio-temporal overlap of a hilltopping lycaenid butterfly community in the Colombian Andes. Journal of Insect Science 9(16): 1–12, 6 figs, 2 tabs. doi: 10.1673/031.009.1601
Rand AS, Rand WM (1982) Variation in rainfall on Barro Colorado Island. In: Leigh Jr. EG, Rand AS, Windsor DM (Eds) The ecology of a tropical forest, Seasonal rhythms and long-term changes. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 47–59.
Robbins RK (1991) Evolution, comparative morphology, and identification of the eumaeine butterfly genus Rekoa Kaye (Lycaenidae: Theclinae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 498: i-iii, 1–64, 116 figs, 17 tabs. http://www.sil.si.edu/SmithsonianContributions/Zoology/pdf_hi/SCTZ-0498.pdf
Robbins RK (2004) Eumaeini. In: Lamas G (Ed) Checklist: Part 4A. Papilionoidea - Hesperioidea. In: Heppner JB (Ed) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville.
Robbins RK, Duarte M (2004) Descriptions of new butterfly genera. Lycaenidae, Eumaeini. In: Lamas G (Ed). Checklist: Part 4A. Hesperioidea - Papilionoidea. In: Heppner JB (Ed) Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Volume 5A. Gainesville, Association for Tropical Lepidoptera; Scientific Publishers: 275-282.
Robbins RK, Martins AR, Busby RC, Duarte M (2012) Loss of male secondary sexual structures in allopatry in the Neotropical butterfly genus Arcas (Lycaenidae: Theclinae: Eumaeini). Insect Systematics & Evolution 43: 35-65. doi: 10.1163/187631212X626195
Scudder SH (1875) Historical sketch of the generic names proposed for butterflies. A contribution to systematic nomenclature. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Boston, (2) 10 (2) : 91–293.
Snodgrass RE (1935) Principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 667 pp.