(C) 2011 J. Bolling Sullivan. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.
So far, two species of Neotherina Dognin have been recorded in Costa Rica. Neotherina imperilla (Dognin) occurs primarily at altitudes between 1100 and 1700 meters and Neotherina callas (Druce) which is widely distributed above 1100 meters. A third, new species, Neotherina xanthosa Sullivan and Chacón is described from altitudes above 2400 meters. Heterogeneity of the genus is discussed.
Taxonomy, Ourapterygini, Nephodiini, Neotherina, Nephodia, Costa Rica
The neotropical ennomine genus, Neotherina Dognin, contains eight species, four of which were recently moved into the genus from other genera (Pitkin 2000). One additional species appears to be misplaced in the genus but so far, no apomorphic characters have been defined for Neotherina. Superficially, the species look like species currently placed in Nephodia Hübner and Lambdina Capps, both of which likely are paraphyletic assemblages.
Photographic methods used herein are described in
Specimens were examined from the following collections:
INBio Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica
JBS J. Bolling Sullivan, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA
USNM National Museum of Natural History, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
Systematicshttp://species-id.net/wiki/Neotherina
Two specimens in the INBio collections were identified as Neotherina imperilla by Linda Pitkin during her work on the Ennominae of Costa Rica (
Neotherina imperilla male adult 1a genital capsule 1b aedeagus 1c female adult 1d and female genitalia 1e
The wing pattern of Neotherina imperilla is similar to many species in Lambdina, Nephodia, and unplaced species that occur at similar altitudes. It may be distinguished by the rounded apex and orange-brown color of the forewings. Similar (probably undescribed) species have a more pointed apex and the ground color is reddish or purplish.
Nothing is known about the life history of this species. It has been collected on the western slope of the Cordillera Volcánica de Guanacaste, the western slope of the Cordillera de Tilaran, both western and eastern slopes of the Cordillera Volcánica Central and both slopes of the Cordillera de Talamanca and the Fila Costeña. Most specimens at INBio (44) come from 1100–1700 m on the western slopes but this may reflect the absence of collecting access to eastern slopes above 900 m.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Neotherina_callas
Figures 2a, 2b, 3, 5a, 5b, 5d This moderately common species is found at altitudes between 1100 and 2800 meters throughout Costa Rica. The forewing appears to be truncated at the tip because there are well-developed extensions of vein M3 in both wings; Females are noticeably larger than males. Adults of this and the following species are shown in Fig. 2. The female genitalia were figured by
This species is unlikely to be confused with any other species in Costa Rica except Neotherina xanthosa because of the characteristic wing shape. The wings are diaphanous and overlaid by a distinct pattern seen only in this species and in Neotherina xanthosa (Fig. 2). It can be separated from the latter by the darker more grayish color and its smaller size, with a male forewing length of 18.95 mm (18–22 mm; n = 64) compared to 22.03 mm in Neotherina xanthosa; females average 21.64 mm (range 19-24 mm; n = 64) versus 23.15 mm in Neotherina xanthosa. Genitalic differences are given under the Neotherina xanthosa diagnosis.
Comparison of Neotherina callas male 2a and female 2b and Neotherina xanthosa male 2c and female (2d) adults.
Neotherina callas male 3a, b and female 3c genitalia.
Nothing is known about the life history of this species. There are over 100 specimens in collections (INBio, USNM, JBS) and it occurs throughout Costa Rica at altitudes between 1100 m and 2800 m along all slopes. At higher altitudes the specimens are larger (see
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:957EF99D-BEF8-4D40-B8AC-2A6458E88450
http://species-id.net/wiki/Neotherina_xanthosa
Figures 2c, 2d, 4, 5c, 5eHolotype male: Costa Rica, Rio Macho. Est. Ojo de Agua. Send. A Torre 47, Cartago Province 2960 m, 26 March 1998, leg. E. Alfaro, B. Gamboa (INBIOCR1002526641) (INBI). Paratypes: (male) same data as type (INBIOCR1002603341); (male) same data as type but 24–28 Feb. 1998 (INBIOCR1002526656); (2 females) Costa Rica, Macizo de la Muerte, Sector de la Esperanza, Cartago Province, 2650 m, Nov. 2002, leg. R Delgado (INB0003534645, 0003554631); (male) same as previous but Sept. 2002, INB0003536193); (male) Costa Rica, San Gerardo de Dota, San Jose Province, 2430 m, 23 Dec. 1981, leg. DH and WH Janzen (INB0004269188); (male) Costa Rica, 4.6 Km E. de Villa Mills, Cartago Province, 2600 m, 21–26 Sept. 1995 (INBIOCR1002435795); (2 females) Costa Rica, Estac. Barva, Braulio Carillo N. P., Heredia Province, 2500 m, G. Rivera (INBIOCR1000089203, 1000089215); (2 females) same, Jan. 1990 (INBIOCR1000121385; 1000206721); (female) same, Feb. 1990 (INBIOCR1000157034); (female) same but leg. A. Fernandez, Nov. 1989 (INBIOCR1000156409); (female) same, Feb. 1990 (INBIOCR1000125703); (female) same, Apr. 1990 (INBIOCR1000169281) (5 females) same but leg. B. Apu & G. Varela, June 1990 (INBIOCR100220347, 100225846, 1000225866); (male, female) Costa Rica, Est. Los Nimbolos, Cerro de la Muerte, San Jose Province, 3150 m, 24–27 Jul. 2008, J.B. Sullivan, (female) Costa Rica, Villa Mills, Cartago Province, 2841 m 19–21 Mar 2010, J.B. Sullivan (GenBank accession number JF855656)(INBio, JBS, USNM).
Neotherina xanthosa, male holotype 4a and male genitalia (4b.c female paratype 4d and female genitalia 4e.
Comparison of genitalic structure in Neotherina callas and Neotherina xanthosa. Two extremes of female signum 5a, b of Neotherina callas compared to Neotherina xanthosa 5c detail of male gnathos and furca of Neotherina callas 5d and Neotherina xanthosa 5e.
The name refers to the yellowish-brown ground color of the maculation.
The species is similar only to Neotherina callas, which it can be distinguished from by its yellowish-brown color and larger size (Fig. 2). Certain identification is best made by dissection of a male and examination of the spinulose terminal portion of the furca. In Neotherina xanthosa it is about half the length of the furca (Fig. 5e), whereas in Neotherina callas it is approximately one fourth as long as the furca (Fig. 5d). The female signa on the bursae differ in shape as well (compare Figs 5a, 5b, 5c). Neotherina xanthosa also differs from Neotherina callas (GenBank accession numbers JF855657; JF855658; JN268704; HM878904) by 5.6% in its DNA barcode.
Male. Fig. 2c, 4a, b, c, 5e. Head – Palps very small, barely extending above middle of eye, scaling straw colored basally becoming chocolate on 2nd and 3rd segments. First segment more than 2 X length of second segment which is more than 2 X length of third segment. Frons brown yellow, square, yellow extending to collar; eyes hemispherical; ocellus absent; tongue normal. Antennae bipectinate, pectinations long at base (5 × shaft width) tapering distally to unpectinated discs in last 8 segments (56–58 segments); bipectinations toward apex with rami swollen distally, more basal bipectinations tubular, not swollen distally. Rami almost chocolate brown, dorsal shaft with scaling brown. Rami originate ventrally just lateral of midline. Scape brown yellow. Thorax and abdomen–Scaling slender, brown and off-white, distinct pad of yellow-brown scales at distal end of metathorax. Dorsal abdominal scaling off white and brown, shorter, thicker scales with multiple points distally (usually 3). Underside similar. Terminal scales on each segment brownish forming poorly-differentiated rings. Legs covered with tightly adhering band and brown scales, those of spurs darker, spurs short, epiphysis slender, long but slightly shorter in length than femur and extending slightly past distal end of femur. Leg scaling extremely difficult to remove. Proportions of leg segments typical. Wings–Forewing venation with two areoles beyond cell, WL 22.03 mm (21–22 mm, N=7). Wing pattern very similar to that of Neotherina callas but ground color in Neotherina callas gray, whereas in Neotherina xanthosa it is brownish yellow. Forewing tip appears scalloped because M3 is extended and there is a similar but smaller extension at M3 on hindwing. Wings of Neotherina callas similar. Male genitalia (Fig. 4b, c, 5e)–Uncus slightly hooked, pencil-like, tapering to a broad base and forming an inverted T. Tegumen very broad, vinculum narrow. Gnathos with arms poorly defined but expanding medially to a broad medial area supporting three or more rows of well-defined spines, extending in height to width of medial pad. Small spines along lateral edge of pad. Furca deflects to right bearing hair-like bristles on inner 20–30%. Furca curves medially, rounded tip. Juxta small, basal area with posterior point. Area medial to furca arm granulated. Valva bulging medially, tapering to tip. Costa sclerotized, broad forming blade-like process at tip of valva. Medial 40% of valve with moderately long setae. Anal edge of valve with bulge medially then tapering to subapical tip. Anellar extensions of costa do not join medially. Female. Figs 2d, 4d, e, 5c. Antenna filiform, otherwise similar to male but slightly larger (WL 23.15 mm; 22–25 mm; n = 22). Female genitalia (Fig. 4e, 5c) – Anal papillae slightly pointed and rounded terminally. Posterior apophyses long, 2 × longer than anterior apophyses. Posterior vaginal plate sclerotized and broadly rounded posteriorly. Anterior plate unsclerotized at base. Ductus bursae short with sclerotized plate dorsally forming collar-like structure. Ductus moderately short. Corpus bursae sac-like with well-defined signum. Dorsal signum round, hollow with star-like basal collar of 13 prongs or points. Center deeply invaginated. Ductus ejaculatorius originates on upper part of corpus bursae below collar on ductus bursae.
Known from above 2400 m in the Talamanca and the Central Volcanic ranges in Costa Rica. In flight throughout the year.
Nothing is known about the biology of this species, or that of any other Neotherina species. Its range probably extends into the other mountain ranges in Costa Rica and northern Panama.
The three species of Neotherina now known from Costa Rica form a heterogeneous assemblage. Wing shapes for Neotherina callas and Neotherina xanthosa are identical, but very different from those of Neotherina imperilla. Of the remaining species, Neotherina melia (Druce), Neotherina simplissima (Dyar) and Neotherina atomeria (Schaus), currently a synonym of Neotherina callas, are extremely similar to Neotherina callas and may be conspecific. Neotherina axona (Druce), Neotherina consequens (Prout), Neotherina inconspicua (Dognin) (currently a synonym of Neotherina imperilla), Neotherina nomia (Druce) and Neotherina carbania (Druce) seem to be a heterogeneous assemblage but we have not dissected nor barcoded most of them. The genitalia examined to date do not present characters apomorphic for Neotherina. Barcoding of geometrid specimens from Costa Rica and Ecuador (Janzen, Sullivan, Brehm, unpubl. data) has revealed very few shared species. Likewise, genital dissections show little overlap between apparent conspecific specimens from western Colombia and Costa Rica (Sullivan, unpubl. data). Additional collections are needed to determine if populations of supposed Neotherina imperilla from Costa Rica are conspecific with those from the type locality, Mt. Tolima, in Colombia.
Neotherina callas and Neotherina xanthosa together with Neotherina melia, Neotherina atomaria, and Neotherina simplissima seem to form a natural group. When additional data on food plants, barcodes, and genitalia of the remaining species currently placed in Neotherina are available, the “callas complex” may require a new genus.
We would like to thank Jocelyn Gill, Don Lafontaine, and Chris Schmidt at the Canadian National Collection; Jocelyn for preparing the illustrations, Don and Chris for suggestions regarding the manuscript. Paul Hebert of the University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada allowed the use of unpublished barcode data. Dan Janzen, Winnie Hallwachs and Gunnar Brehm graciously shared their barcode data. Bernardo Espinosa prepared and photographed genitalia preparations at INBio.