ZooKeys 148: 197–208, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.148.1712
Webspinners in Early Eocene amber from western India (Insecta, Embiodea)
Michael S. Engel1,2,†, David A. Grimaldi2,‡, Hukam Singh3,§, Paul C. Nascimbene2,|
1 Division of Entomology (Paleoentomology), Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 1501 Crestline Drive – Suite 140, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66049-2811, USA
2 Division of Invertebrate Zoology (Entomology), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, New York 10024-5192, USA
3 Birbal Sahni Institute of Paleobotany, 53 University Road, Lucknow 226 007, India

Corresponding author: Michael S. Engel (msengel@ku.edu), David A. Grimaldi (grimaldi@amnh.org)

Academic editor: Michael Ohl

received 14 June 2011 | accepted 16 August 2011 | Published 21 November 2011


(C) 2011 Michael S. Engel. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Abstract

The family Scelembiidae (Neoembiodea: Embiomorpha: Archembioidea) is recorded from Asia for the first time, based on two individuals preserved in Early Eocene amber from the Cambay Basin, western India. Kumarembia hurleyi Engel & Grimaldi, gen. n. et sp. n., is described, figured, and distinguished from other archembioid genera. The genus shares male genitalic features with scelembiids, otherwise known from South America and Africa.

Keywords

Polyneoptera, Embioptera, Embiidina, Neoembiodea, Tertiary, taxonomy, India

Introduction

Embiodea are one of the more infrequently encountered and investigated orders of insects. This is unfortunate given their remarkable morphological specializations, most of which relate to the production of and life within silken galleries. For example, the probasitarsus is greatly swollen and encompasses distinctive silk glands from which the galleries are spun. The wings are unique among the flying insects for their great flexibility, permitting individuals to move in reverse through their silken tunnels, but can be made more rigid by pumping haemolymph into distinctive ‘blood sinuses’, enabling them to gain temporary rigor and permit controlled flight. Females are apterous, while males can be either fully winged or shed their wings, much like termites. Even more fascinating is that where known, all species are gregarious, living in small colonies, much like their putative relatives among the Zoraptera.

The relationship of Embiodea to other orders has been problematic, much like everything pertaining to the phylogeny of webspinners. Among the numerous competing hypotheses, those with the greatest support are a relationship to the Phasmatodea (e.g., Rähle 1970; Terry and Whiting 2005; Kjer et al. 2006; Ishiwata et al. 2011) or the Zoraptera (e.g., Engel and Grimaldi 2000; Grimaldi and Engel 2005; Yoshizawa 2007, 2011). Considerable work continues documenting the diversity of the order, with many hundreds of new species awaiting description (Ross 2000), and revising hypotheses of relationship based on this growing knowledge of the range of morphological variation observed across this fascinating group. Unfortunately, the fossil record has to date provided minimal insights toward clarifying systematic issues pertaining to embiodean evolution. This is because only nine definitive webspinner species are known from the fossil record (Table 1) and many of these are relatively modern, thereby relating more to questions of Tertiary biogeography than to higher-level branching patterns, many of which likely date from the Early Cretaceous or even Late Jurassic. Given this sparse record, any fossil webspinners are of considerable significance.

Herein we provide the description of a new genus and species of fossil webspinner based on two exceptionally well preserved individuals (Fig. 1, 2) recently recovered from Early Eocene amber of the Cambay Basin in western India. These are the first fossil webspinners from Asia (Table 1) and also the first records of their family, Scelembiidae, from the Oriental Region.

Table 1.

Described fossil webspinners (updated from Engel and Grimaldi 2006). The fossil Clothonopsis miocenica Hong and Wang (1987) from the Miocene of China was originally described as a clothodid but is actually a bibionid fly (Zhang 1993).

Embiodea: Neoembiodea
Teratembiidae
Oligembia vetusta Szumik, 1994 Miocene (Burdigalian) Dominican Republic
Anisembiidae
Poinarembia rota Ross, 2003b Miocene (Burdigalian) Dominican Republic
Glyphembia amberica Ross, 2003b Miocene (Burdigalian) Dominican Republic
Glyphembia vetehae (Szumik, 1998) Ross, 2003b Miocene (Burdigalian) Dominican Republic
Embiidae
Embia florissantensis” Cockerell, 1908* Eocene-Oligocene Colorado
Electroembia antiqua (Pictet, 1854) Ross, 1956 Eocene (Lutetian) Baltic
Scelembiidae
Kumarembia hurleyi, gen. et sp. n. Eocene (Ypresian) India
Pachylembiidae: Sorellembiinae
Sorellembia estherae Engel & Grimaldi, 2006 Cretaceous (Albian) Myanmar
Notoligotomidae: Burmitembiinae
Burmitembia venosa Cockerell, 1919 Cretaceous (Albian) Myanmar
*Incertae Sedis*
Sinembiidae
Sinembia rossi Huang & Nel, 2009 Jurassic (Bathonian) Inner Mongolia, China
Juraembia ningchengensis Huang & Nel, 2009 Jurassic (Bathonian) Inner Mongolia, China

* This species has been placed in the genus “Lithembia” by Ross (1984) but as noted by Engel and Grimaldi (2006) and Miller (2009) the generic name is a nomen nudum and so we have reverted to Cockerell’s original combination for our table. The species very likely does not belong to Embia and the two syntypes (UCM-4421 and YPM-26169) should be re-examined and critically revised (based on photographs of the specimens they would appear to have the primitive condition of basal vein branching as delimited by Szumik (1996) (Engel pers. obs.).** E.S. Ross (pers. comm. 2010) presently does not consider these to belong to Embiodea and, indeed, the presence of a distinct ovipositor, fully-winged females, absence of probasitarsal modifications (which is not swollen despite the assertion of the authors), absence of a radial blood sinus (indeed, from the figures provided, the presence of any blood sinuses seems to require confirmation), and cerci with three cercomeres exclude the species from the order. These species certainly require revision, as do all compressions presently assigned to Embiodea.

Material and methods

The age, origin, and biotic diversity of the Cambay amber are reviewed by Rust et al. (2010). Briefly, the amber occurs in rich concentrations within lignite mines in Gujurat State, western India. Its dating based on microfossils is earliest Eocene, ca. 50–52 Ma, just prior to complete suturing of India to the Asian continental plate. The amber was formed by trees in the Dipterocarpaceae, which are the dominant rainforest trees in Southeast Asia today. Specimens were prepared and preserved using the methods described by Nascimbene and Silverstein (2000). Morphological terminology and abbreviations largely follow those of Ross (2000) and the general classification is modified from (Ross (1970, 2001, 2003a, 2003b, 2006, 2007), (Szumik (1996, 2004), Engel and Grimaldi (2006), Szumik et al. (2008), and Miller (2009). Measurements were made using an ocular micrometer on an Olympus SZX-12 stereomicroscope and photomicrographs prepared using a Nikon D1× digital camera attached to an Infinity K-2 long-distance microscope lens.

Systematic paleontology
Family Scelembiidae Ross, 2001

http://species-id.net/wiki/Scelembiidae

Diagnosis.

Mandibles depressed, with incisive teeth well differentiated from molar area. Wings without crossveins between MA1 and MA2; CuA frequently diffuse. Male 10T with a membranous area occupying base and center of sclerite; 10R and 10L connected by thin basal bar; 10RP2 present, short, thumb-like; 10LP1 a curved, apically-forked process; HP rectangular, centered; LC1 with setae on apical area.

Included genera.

Ambonembia Ross (=Ischnosembia Ross), Biguembia Szumik (=Aphanembia Ross), Gibocercus Szumik, Kumarembia Engel and Grimaldi gen. n., Litosembia Ross, Malacosembia Ross, Navasiella Davis, Pararhagadochir Davis, and Rhagadochir Enderlein (=Scelembia Ross) (Szumik 2004).

Type species.

Kumarembia hurleyi Engel and Grimaldi, sp. n.

Diagnosis.

Male: Head relatively slender, longer than wide, elongate oval (Fig. 3a), slightly narrowed posteriad; compound eyes well developed, prominent, emarginate at base of antenna, and less so on posterodorsal margin, setose, with stiff setae, some longer than diameter of facets, and most setae on outermost distal surface (Fig. 3b); ocelli absent; antennae long, with 17 articles (incomplete in holotype, number of articles based on paratype), articles apparently uniformly sclerotized and pigmented (apical articles not differently pigmented or unpigmented); lacinia entirely sclerotized, with two small apical teeth (Fig. 3b), remainder of maxilla generalized; mentum sclerotized, small, approximately one-third length of labium, without setae, tightly joined to submentum; submentum sclerotic, with four stiff, very fine setae, anterior margin straight (appearing to have medial hump owing to mentum), lateral margins relatively straight and converging posteriorly toward base, margins meet before ventral margin of head capsule (Fig. 3b); ventral surface of head capsule, lateral to prementum, with eight (four pairs) fine, stiff, erect setae, head capsule otherwise with numerous decumbent setae, especially dorsally. Cervical area extensively membranous, especially ventrally. Pronotum longer than wide, well sclerotized and apparently pigmented, anterior margin straight, with prominent anterolateral corners, faintly constricted just posterior to anterior margin, posterior margin constricted, with rounded posterolateral corners, dorsally depressed just posterior to anterior margin (resulting in the anterior margin appearing somewhat lip-like), with thin, longitudinal, membranous “fracture” at midline (Fig. 3a). Wings large, mildly infumate; R reaching wing margin, straight apically (not procurved to terminate anteriorly); no c-r crossveins evident; Rs simple, terminating at wing apex (Fig. 4c), several r-rs crossveins present; single rs-ma1 crossvein present shortly after origin of MA1; MA apically forked, MA1 and MA2 both reaching wing margin, without crossveins between them (Fig. 4c); MP simple, reaching to apical wing margin; CuA apparently joining MP apically. Protibia greatest width 0.33× length, silk-producing surface slightly concave (Fig. 4a); distal end with two minute, sclerotized, slightly-curved, spine-like setae on mesal surface (Fig. 4a); metafemur swollen; metabasitarus (= metatarsomere I) elongate, without plantunlae (as in Pararhagadochir); metatarsomere II exceptionally short, without plantula; metadistitarsus (= metatarsomere III) elongate, nearly as long as combined lengths of metabasitarsus and metatarsomere II; pretarsal claws simple; arolium absent (Fig. 4a, 4b). Male terminalia asymmetrical; dorsally with left hemitergite (10L) relatively broad; right hemitergite (10R) relatively narrow, tapering posteriorly; hemitergites separated by membranous area, connected proximally by a thin sclerotic band (Fig. 4e); left tergal process (LP) sclerotized, short, curved, with forked apex, internal (caudad) hook longer than external (proximad) hook, both with tapered and pointed apices (Fig. 4e); right tergal caudal process (RP1) long, extending to LC1, apex with minute hook caudally and gentle lobe proximally; right tergal anterior process (RP2) present, short, thumb-like; ventrally with hypandrium (H) relatively large, broad, with rectangular hypandrial process (HP) positioned medially (Fig. 4d); cercomeres well sclerotized and uniformly covered by stiff, elongate setae in loose whorls (Fig. 4d); apical cercomeres (LC2 and RC2) slightly longer than basal cercomeres (similar to Archembia); left basal cercomere (LC1) medially expanded and lobed (Fig. 4d), left cercal basipodite comprising a sclerotic flange fused to outer rim of LC1 and without evidence of inner lobe or ring; right basal cercomere (RC1) well sclerotized throughout, cylindrical (Fig. 4d, 4e).

Female: Unknown.

Etymology.

The new generic name is a combination of Kumar (honoring Dr. Kumar Krishna, faithful colleague and dear friend, as well as the world’s leading authority on the systematics of Isoptera), and Embia, type genus of and frequent stem for embiodeans. The name is feminine.

Holotype.

♂; AMNH Tad-261-A (Fig. 1), India: Gujurat: Tadkeshwar lignite mine, Cambay Formation (Paleo-Eocene), 21°21.400'N, 73°4.532'E, 17–22 January 2010; to be deposited in the Birbal Sahni Institute of Paleobotany, Lucknow, India.

Paratype.

♂; AMNH Tad-253 (Fig. 2), India: Gujurat: Tadkeshwar lignite mine, Cambay Formation (Paleo-Eocene), 21°21.400'N, 73°4.532'E, 17–22 January 2010; in the Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York.

Diagnosis.

As for the genus (vide supra).

Description.

Male: Total length (excluding wings and antennae, as preserved) 5.3 mm; forewing length (estimated) 5.1 mm, width 1.1 mm; integument generally light brown except darker on head and antenna, finely imbricate and impunctate where evident (based on paratype, integument of holotype slightly wrinkled owing to apparent desiccation and shrinkage of individual). Head length (to apex of labrum) 1.1 mm, width (just posterior to compound eyes) 0.64 mm, head posterior to compound eyes longer than compound eye diameter, posterior border gently rounded, covered with numerous, short, prominent setae, longer ventrally (Fig. 3). Pronotum length 0.56 mm, width (medial) 0.40 mm, apparently with weak longitudinal strigae in posterior half, with abundant fine setae as follows: anterior margin with row of ~10 setae, medial pair cruciate, lateral to these an upright pair, and lateral to those three pairs medioclinate setae; lateral margins with row ~8 erect setae of variable lengths; dorsal surface with two lateral rows of five short setae each; a short, anteromedial, cruciate pair, and longer posteromedial pair (Fig. 3). Wing membranes micronodulose and with numerous minute setae. LC1 length 0.28 mm, width at level of medial lobe 0.24 mm; LC2 length 0.36 mm; RC1 length 0.26 mm, RC2 length 0.35 mm.

Female: Unknown.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is a patronym honoring Mr. Ailan Hurley-Echevarria for his diligent efforts in processing and screening amber, during which he personally found one of the two specimens.

Figure 1.

Photomicrograph of holotype male (Tad-261-A) of Kumarembia hurleyi Engel & Grimaldi, gen. et sp. n., in Early Eocene amber from western India. Total length of individual 5.3 mm.

Figure 2.

Photomicrographs of paratype male (Tad-253) of Kumarembia hurleyi Engel & Grimaldi, gen. et sp. n., in Early Eocene amber from western India. A Ventral aspect B Dorsal aspect. Total length of individual 5.2 mm.

Figure 3.

Line drawings of Kumarembia hurleyi Engel & Grimaldi, gen. et sp. n. A Head of holotype, dorsal view B Head of paratype, ventral view. Head length (to apex of labrum) 1.1 mm.

Figure 4.

Line drawings of Kumarembia hurleyi Engel & Grimaldi, gen. et sp. n. (a, b, and d to same scale). A Protarsus of holotype, dorsal view B Protarsus of holotype, ventral view C Forewing apex of holotype D Male genitalia of holotype, ventral view E Male genitalia of holotype, dorsal view. Refer to description for individual measurements.

Discussion

The phylogeny of most webspinner lineages remain contentious and in a state of flux. More importantly, numerous undescribed genera and species are known in collections and will likely have a strong influence on any estimations of relationship. It is therefore challenging to make fine determinations of the closest relatives for the Cambay amber fossils. Kumarembia can be placed within the Archembioidea clade by the 10T with a membranous area occupying the base and center of the sclerite, 10R and 10L connected by a thin basal bar, and 10RP2 present, short, and thumb-like. The genus can be placed within the Scelembiidae [= Group C of Szumik (2004); Group A = Archembiidae s.str., Group B = Pachylembiidae] by the rectangular and centered HP and the shape of 10LP1 which is a curved process and apically forked (simple, curved, and externally laminate in Pachylembiidae). This is quite significant given that other members of the clade occur in sub-Saharan Africa (Angola, Congo, Tanzania, Uganda) or in South America, particularly southern South America (e.g., Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, and Peru, although Pararhagadochir is more widespread, extending as far north as Colombia and Venezuela). Accordingly, the discovery of a scelembiid in Cambay amber appears to represent one of the only Gondwanan elements of the fauna, while most other taxa show considerably different biogeographic affinities (Rust et al. 2010). As noted, relationships within Embiodea are contentious, with considerable cladistic inquiry revising phylogenetic hypotheses (e.g., Szumik 2004; Szumik et al. 2008; Klass and Ulbricht 2009). As these hypotheses of relationship continue to stabilize it will be interesting to explore further and refine the specific affinity of Kumarembia cambayensis with particular clades within Scelembiidae.

Acknowledgements

Considerable gratitude is extended to Ailan Hurley-Echevarria for his efforts in processing and screening amber, and to A. Sahni for his cooperation and encouragement of paleontological research in India. Photomicrographs were prepared by Ismael A. Hinojosa-Díaz under the direction of MSE. Partial support was provided by University of Kansas Ecology & Evolutionary Biology General Research Fund Allocation #2301465 (to MSE) and by funds provided to DAG by Robert G. Goelet, Chairman Emeritus of the AMNH Board of Trustees. This is a contribution of the Division of Entomology, University of Kansas Natural History Museum.

References
Cockerell TDA (1908) Descriptions of Tertiary insects, II. American Journal of Science, Series 4 25: 227–232.
Cockerell TDA (1919) Two interesting insects in Burmese amber. Entomologist 52: 193-195.
Engel MS, Grimaldi DA (2000) A winged Zorotypus in Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic (Zoraptera: Zorotypidae), with discussion on relationships of and within the order. Acta Geológica Hispánica 35(1–2): 149-164.
Engel MS, Grimaldi DA (2006) The earliest webspinners (Insecta: Embiodea). American Museum Novitates 3514: 1-15. doi: 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3514[1:TEWIE]2.0.CO;2
Grimaldi D, Engel MS (2005) Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xv+755 pp. doi: 10.2277/0521821495
Hong Y-C, Wang W-L (1987) Miocene Emboptera [sic] and Coleoptera (Insecta) of Shanwang, Shandong Province, China. Professional Papers of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology 17: 257-262. [In Chinese, with English summary]
Huang D-Y, Nel A (2009) Oldest webspinners from the middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China (Insecta: Embiodea). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 156 (4): 889-895. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00499.x
Ishiwata K, Sasaki G, Ogawa J, Miyata T, Su Z-H (2011) Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein-coding gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 58 (2): 169-180. doi: 10.1016/j.mpev.2010.11.001
Kjer KM, Carle FL, Litman J, Ware J (2006) A molecular phylogeny of Insecta. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny 64 (1): 35-44.
Klass K-D, Ulbricht J (2009) The female genitalic region and gonoducts of Embioptera (Insecta), with general discussions on female genitalia in insects. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 9 (2): 115-154. doi: 10.1016/j.odr.2009.01.002
Miller KB (2009) Genus- and family-group names in the order Embioptera (Insecta). Zootaxa 2055: 1-34.
Nascimbene P, Silverstein H (2000) The preparation of fragile Cretaceous ambers for conservation and study of organismal inclusions. In: Grimaldi D (Ed). Studies on Fossils in Amber, with Particular Reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 93-102.
Pictet FJ (1854) Traité de Paléontologie ou histoire naturelle des animaux fossiles considérés dans leurs rapports zoologiques et géologiques [Seconde Édition, revue, corrigée, considérablement augmentée, accompagnée d’un atlas de 110 planches grand in-4º]: Tome Deuxième. Baillière, Paris, 727 pp.
Rähle W (1970) Untersuchungen an Kopf und Prothorax von Embia ramburi Rimsky-Korsakow 1906 (Embioptera, Embiidae). Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere 87: 248-330.
Ross ES (1956) A new genus of Embioptera from Baltic amber. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologischen Staatsinstitut in Hamburg 25: 76-81.
Ross ES (1970) Biosystematics of the Embioptera. Annual Review of Entomology 15: 157-171. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.15.010170.001105
Ross ES (1984) A synopsis of the Embiidina of the United States. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 86 (1): 82-93.
Ross ES (2000) EMBIA: Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 1. Origin, relationships and integumental anatomy of the insect order Embiidina. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 149: 1-53.
Ross ES (2001) EMBIA: Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 3. The Embiidae of the Americas (Order Embiidina). Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 150: 1-86.
Ross ES (2003a) EMBIA: Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 4. Andesembiidae, a new Andean family of Embiidina. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 153: 1-13.
Ross ES (2003b) EMBIA: Contributions to the biosystematics of the insect order Embiidina. Part 5. A review of the family Anisembiidae with descriptions of new taxa. Occasional Papers of the California Academy of Sciences 154: 1-123.
Ross ES (2006) Paedembiidae, a remarkable new family and infraorder of Embiidina from Afghanistan. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Series 4 57(27): 785–794.
Ross ES (2007) The Embiidina of eastern Asia, Part I. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, Series 4 58(29): 575–600.
Rust J, Singh H, Rana RS, McCann T, Singh L, Anderson K, Sarkar N, Nascimbene PC, Stebner F, Thomas JC, Solórzano-Kraemer M, Williams CJ, Engel MS, Sahni A, Grimaldi D (2010) Biogeographic and evolutionary implications of a diverse paleobiota in amber from the Early Eocene of India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 107 (43): 18360-18365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007407107
Szumik CA (1994) Oligembia vetusta, a new fossil teratembiid (Embioptera) from Dominican amber. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 102 (1): 67-73.
Szumik CA (1996) The higher classification of the order Embioptera: A cladistic analysis. Cladistics 12 (1): 41-64. doi: 10.1006/clad.1996.0004
Szumik CA (1998) Una nueva especie de Anisembiidae (Insecta, Embioptera) en ámbar dominicano. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 42(1–2): 7-8.
Szumik CA (2004) Phylogenetic systematics of Archembiidae (Embiidina, Insecta). Systematic Entomology 29 (2): 215-237. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-6970.2004.00239.x
Szumik CA, Edgerly JS, Hayashi CY (2008) Phylogeny of embiopterans (Insecta). Cladistics 24 (6): 993-1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00228.x
Terry MD, Whiting MF (2005) Mantophasmatodea and phylogeny of the lower neopterous insects. Cladistics 21 (3): 240-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00062.x
Yoshizawa K (2007) The Zoraptera problem: Evidence for Zoraptera + Embiodea from the wing base. Systematic Entomology 32 (2): 197-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2007.00379.x
Yoshizawa K (2011) Monophyletic Polyneoptera recovered by wing base structure. Systematic Entomology 36 (3): 377-394. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00572.x
Zhang J-F (1993) New Miocene species of Bibionidae (Insecta: Diptera) with discussion on taxonomic position of Clothonopsis miocenica. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 32 (2): 141-150. [In Chinese, with English summary]