Research Article |
Corresponding author: Hideyuki Chiba ( skipper@i.bekkoame.ne.jp ) Corresponding author: Xiao-Ling Fan ( fanxiaol66@scau.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Thomas Simonsen
© 2016 Zhen-Fu Huang, Wei Fei, Min Wang, Hideyuki Chiba, Xiao-Ling Fan.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Huang Z-F, Fei W, Wang M, Chiba H, Fan X-L (2016) A preliminary molecular phylogeny of the genus Scobura, with a synonym of Scobura masutaroi (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). ZooKeys 638: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.638.10026
|
A molecular phylogeny of the genus Scobura based on the mitochondrial COI and the nuclear EF-1α genes using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference is proposed. The analyses include 19 specimens from nine ingroup species. The monophyly of Scobura is not strongly supported, but two strongly supported monophyletic groups within the genus are recognized: the S. coniata group and the S. woolletti group. Judging from combination of the molecular evidence and morphological features, the former consists of six species, including S. masutaroi, while four species belong to the latter. S. mouchai Krajcik, 2013 is confirmed to be a syn. n. of S. masutaroi Sugiyama, 1996. The key to the species of the genus Scobura is modified to reflect these results.
COI, EF-1α, Scobura masutaroi , Scobura mouchai
The skipper genus Scobura Elwes & Edwards, 1897 was recently revised by
Although a comprehensive morphological revision of the genus has been completed, no phylogenetic analysis has been performed to infer relationships within the genus. In the present study, we present a preliminary phylogeny of Scobura, based on molecular evidence. By comparing molecular and morphological evidence, we examine whether S. mouchai is a synonym of S. masutaroi.
See
Twenty-three specimens including nine of the 15 valid species of Scobura and four outgroup species were included in the phylogenetic reconstruction. Detailed information on the specimens is provided in Table
Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for the specimens in this study.
Species | Locality | Latitude | Longitude | Voucher Number | COI | EF-1α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scobura cephaloides kinkaEvans, 1949 | China: Hainan | 19.02N | 109.53E | SCAU He102 | KY049936 | KY049958 |
Scobura cephaloides kinkaEvans, 1949 | Laos: Luang Prabang | 19.93N | 102.07E | Onodera He553 | KY049937 | KY049959 |
Scobura coniata Hering, 1918 | China: Guangdong | 24.91N | 113.04E | SCAU He073 | KY049938 | KY049960 |
Scobura coniata Hering, 1918 | China: Guangdong | 24.87N | 113.03E | SCAU He472 | KY049939 | KY049961 |
Scobura hainana (Gu & Wang, 1997) | China: Guangdong | 24.87N | 113.04E | SCAU He471 | KY049940 | KY049962 |
Scobura hainana (Gu & Wang, 1997) | China: Guangdong | 24.87N | 113.04E | SCAU He487 | KY049941 | KY049963 |
Scobura hainana (Gu & Wang, 1997) | China: Guangdong | 24.87N | 113.04E | SCAU He488 | KY049942 | KY049964 |
Scobura isota (Swinhoe, 1893) | Thailand: Kanchanaburi | 14.08N | 99.36E | SCAU He538 | KY049943 | KY049965 |
Scobura isota (Swinhoe, 1893) | Thailand: Mae Hong Son | 19.35N | 98.14E | SCAU He468 | KY049944 | KY049966 |
Scobura lyso (Evans, 1939) | China: Zhejiang | 30.15N | 119.25E | SCAU He465 | KY049945 | — |
Scobura lyso (Evans, 1939) | China: Zhejiang | 30.15N | 119.25E | SCAU He475 | KY049946 | — |
Scobura masutaroi Sugiyama, 1996 | China: Sichuan | 29.94N | 102.48E | SCAU He300 | KY049947 | KY049967 |
Scobura masutaroi Sugiyama, 1996 | China: Sichuan | 29.94N | 102.48E | SCAU He301 | KY049948 | KY049968 |
Scobura masutaroi Sugiyama, 1996 (=mouchai) | China: Shaanxi | 31.91N | 106.34E | SCAU He303 | KY049949 | KY049969 |
Scobura
parawoolletti
|
China: Hainan | 19.03N | 109.53E | SCAU He116 | KY049950 | KY049970 |
Scobura
stellata
|
China: Guangdong | 24.92N | 113.01E | SCAU He036 | KY049951 | KY049971 |
Scobura woolletti (Riley, 1923) | Indonesia: Kabandungan | 6.77 S | 106.60E | KU He535 | KY049952 | KY049972 |
Scobura woolletti (Riley, 1923) | Indonesia: Kabandungan | 6.77 S | 106.60E | KU He536 | KY049953 | KY049973 |
Scobura woolletti (Riley, 1923) | Indonesia: Kabandungan | 6.77 S | 106.60E | KU He537 | KY049954 | KY049974 |
Suastus gremius (Fabricius, 1798) | China: Guangdong | 23.15N | 113.34E | SCAU He157 | KY049955 | KY049975 |
Suada swerga (deNicéville, 1884) | Thailand: Chiang Mai | 18.80N | 98.92E | SCAU He495 | KY049956 | KY049976 |
Hyarotis quinquepunctatus Fan & Chiba, 2008 | China: Hainan | 19.03N | 109.54E | SCAU He114 | — | KY049977 |
Zographetus satwa (deNicéville, 1884) | China: Guangdong | 24.88N | 113.03E | SCAU He442 | KY049957 | KY049978 |
Genomic DNA was extracted from the thorax of specimens preserved in ethanol, or from legs of dried specimens, using Magen’s Blood/cell/tissue DNA extraction kit. One mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and one nuclear gene elongation factor 1-α (EF-1α) were used as molecular phylogenetic markers. The following primers were used for amplification and sequencing in this study: for COI – primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 (
Amplified DNA products were purified using an Agarose Gel Extraction kit (Magen Biotech), and directly sequenced, or cloned with pMD18-T vector (Takara Inc), and then sequenced. Sequencing was performed using the ABI 3730 automated sequencer. All sequences were submitted to the Genbank database (accession numbers are given in Table
Alignment of the DNA sequences were performed in Clustal X (
From a total of 23 samples, 22 sequences for COI and 21 for EF-1α were obtained. The alignment of the combined sequences consisted of a total of 1724 bp (658 bp of COI and 1066 bp of EF-1α genes, respectively), including 277 variable and 200 informative sites.
The pairwise P2K distances among the sequences were variable between genes. The ranges of sequence divergences for two loci and ingroup taxa are: COI (0–12.4%), EF-1α (0–5.0%). For COI, sequence divergence between conspecific individuals ranged from 0 to 0.6%; inter-specific genetic distances ranged from 3.6% to 12.4% with divergences among species averaging 7.9% (Table
Uncorrected pairwise genetic distances (Kimura 2-parameter) for the COI sequences of the genus Scobura species.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | S. cephaloides 102 | ||||||||||||||||||
2 | S. cephaloides 553 | 0.003 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | S. coniata 73 | 0.096 | 0.098 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | S. coniata 472 | 0.096 | 0.098 | 0.000 | |||||||||||||||
5 | S. hainana 471 | 0.084 | 0.085 | 0.059 | 0.059 | ||||||||||||||
6 | S. hainana 487 | 0.084 | 0.085 | 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.000 | |||||||||||||
7 | S. hainana 488 | 0.084 | 0.085 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.002 | 0.002 | ||||||||||||
8 | S. isota 468 | 0.115 | 0.117 | 0.122 | 0.122 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.099 | |||||||||||
9 | S. isota 538 | 0.113 | 0.115 | 0.118 | 0.118 | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.006 | ||||||||||
10 | S. lyso 465 | 0.087 | 0.089 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0.105 | 0.101 | |||||||||
11 | S. lyso 475 | 0.085 | 0.087 | 0.061 | 0.061 | 0.036 | 0.036 | 0.036 | 0.101 | 0.098 | 0.003 | ||||||||
12 | S. masutaroi 300 | 0.092 | 0.096 | 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.107 | 0.103 | 0.052 | 0.052 | |||||||
13 | S. masutaroi 301 | 0.092 | 0.096 | 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.107 | 0.103 | 0.052 | 0.052 | 0.000 | ||||||
14 | S. masutaroi 303 | 0.092 | 0.096 | 0.059 | 0.059 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.056 | 0.109 | 0.105 | 0.052 | 0.052 | 0.002 | 0.002 | |||||
15 | S. parawoolletti 116 | 0.094 | 0.097 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.112 | 0.108 | 0.084 | 0.084 | 0.084 | 0.084 | 0.084 | ||||
16 | S. stellata 36 | 0.101 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.104 | 0.101 | 0.101 | 0.099 | 0.108 | 0.105 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.094 | 0.070 | |||
17 | S. woolletti 535 | 0.094 | 0.097 | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.124 | 0.121 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.039 | 0.074 | ||
18 | S. woolletti 536 | 0.092 | 0.096 | 0.094 | 0.094 | 0.084 | 0.084 | 0.084 | 0.123 | 0.119 | 0.090 | 0.090 | 0.097 | 0.097 | 0.098 | 0.038 | 0.072 | 0.002 | |
19 | S. woolletti 537 | 0.094 | 0.097 | 0.096 | 0.096 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.124 | 0.121 | 0.092 | 0.092 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.099 | 0.039 | 0.074 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
The two model-based analyses (BI and ML) revealed nearly identical topologies, differing mainly in branch support (Fig.
Clade B is comprised by S. masutaroi and the representatives of S. coniata group (
In all the analyses, S. cephaloides is sister to Clade B, with moderate support (BP = 63, PP = 0.92), whereas the relationships between S. isota and the other clades (Clade A, S. cephaloides and Clade B) remain unresolved.
Although our phylogenetic analyses do not strongly support the monophyly of the genus Scobura, two strongly supported monophyletic groups within the genus are recognized: the S. coniata group and the S. woolletti group. The members of the coniata group share the following four morphological characters: 1) male band of scent scales on both sides of veins CuA1 and CuA2 and above 2A on the forewing (Fig.
Based on the original description, distribution data, and the illustrations provided by
A well-support clade comprised by S. stellata, S. parawoolletti and S. woolletti was recovered in all analyses. These species share the following three characters: 1) hindwing with white spots on underside but not on upperside; 2) socius slender and pointed at tip; and 3) juxta funnel-like, thin and long basally. The generic name Mimambrix Riley, 1923 was proposed with Mimambrix woolletti as the type species, but later synonymized by
The key given by
3 | Forewing upper side without spots in spaces M3 or M1 and M2 | 4 |
– | Forewing upper side with spots in spaces M1, M2 and M3 | 6 |
4 | Forewing upper side without spots in spaces M1 and M3, hindwing under side: basal half yellow, distally ferruginous, with five small spots | S. cephaloides |
– | Forewing upper side without spot in space M3 | 5 |
5 | Hindwing under side with a conspicuous rectangular white spot in space CuA2 | S. cephala |
– | Hindwing under side without a conspicuous rectangular white spot in space CuA2 | S. isota |
6 | Hindwing upper side without spot in space CuA1, under side with small white spots in spaces Sc+R1, M1-2, M3 and cell | S. eximia |
– | Hindwing upper side with the spot in space CuA1 | 7 |
7 | Forewing cell spots conjoined, subequal | 8 |
– | Forewing cell spots separated, if conjoined, the lower spot much larger | 9 |
8 | Hindwing upper side hyaline spots white | S. evansi |
– | Hindwing upper side hyaline spots yellow | S. masutaroi |
9 | Forewing upper side the spot in space CuA2 triangular, and with a linear stigma crossing the spots in spaces CuA1 and CuA2 | S. coniata |
– | Forewing upper side the spot in space CuA2 not as above | 10 |
10 | Forewing upper side the spot in space CuA1 narrow, hindwing upper side without spot in space | S. lyso |
– | Forewing upper side the spot in space CuA1 broad | 11 |
11 | Hindwing upper side spot in space M3 tiny dot, forewing upper side cell spots cell spots conjoined | S. hainana |
– | Hindwing upper side spot in space M3 significant, forewing upper side cell spots cell spots separated | S. phuongi |
Scobura masutaroi Sugiyama, 1996: 9 (Type locality: Dujiangyan, Sichuan, China)
Scobura mouchai Krajcik, 2013: 2, syn. n. (Type locality: Fengxian, Shaanxi, China)
1♂, 1♀, Nibashan, Rongjing, Sichuan, 26.VII.2009, Min Wang; 1♂, Jialingjiang, Fengxian, Shaanxi, 15.VII.2010, Min Wang.
Forewing length 17–18 mm. This species is different from other species of S. coniata group in the appearance of the wing upper side: forewing with yellow streak in subcosta space basally, a big cell spots solid across cell, the spot in space CuA2 yellow; hindwing with spots in spaces CuA1 and M1-M2 yellow. Wing under side: forewing costal and submarginal spots yellow; hindwing all veins and submarginal spots from spaces Sc+R1 to CuA2 yellow; and all yellow submarginal spots conjoined both forewing and hindwing.
Male genitalia (Fig.
Female genitalia (Fig.
China (Sichuan, Shaanxi).
We are grateful to Drs Liu-Sheng Chen (Shihezi University, Xinjiang, China), Hou-shuai Wang and Hai-ming Xu (SCAU) for collecting the specimens. Materials of some species were provided by the Kyushu University museum, Dr Osamu Yata and Mr Hiroaki Onodera. The work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC- 31172136 and -31471984).